quantum Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This below provides an an excellent description of
> the state of education today. While it expresses
> a grasp of facts and an an analysis considerably
> beyond my own experience base and skills, it
> connects with the complaints that many parents
> have about the public schools.
>
>
http://ednews.org/articles/28449/1/An-Interview-wi
> th-George-K-Cunningham--Helping-or-Hindering-Poten
> tial-Teachers/Page1.html
>
> See in particular the sections about reading and
> math teaching (items 4 & 5). He confirms what so
> many parents have been intuiting, who are so often
> regarded as having insufficient expertise to
> comment (or worse, derided as elitist for the sin
> of wanting high educational standards for their
> children).
>
> This topic of course underlies most all of the
> debates surrounding redistricting - and irony upon
> irony, I would hazard a guess that the most ardent
> pro and con redistricting types would, if they
> could speak with candor, both agree with this
> commentator.
>
> So the question is not one of just drawing lines
> on a redistricting map, but rather who has to bear
> the burden for the mess that educrats have helped
> to create. As many have commented, the sense of
> division that the school board has created has
> likely helped in furthering its mission of, as
> Cunningham puts it, critical pedagogy.
Too ironic.
Let me quote the article:
Critical pedagogy literature tends to be nearly unreadable. The authors of the articles on the topic write in ways that make it extremely difficult to understand. They seem to believe that if the reader can't understand it, they are likely to conclude that the writing is brilliant rather than nonsensical.
Is that Quantum, or what?