That's it?

Why are you mad at me?

You should be angry with yourself for you complete impotence when it comes to finding any links to data, images or the historical record to substantiate your claims.

That's the ultimate failure and it is all on YOU.

It has nothing to do with me.

Do you just expect me to allow you to lie with impunity?

As you know from your long and failed history of trying to find one, there are no lies of mine here. It is a FACT that you lied about the weather, and also that you have ADMITTED to never having seen either thr CMYK street view or The Broad Street of 1986-97. Ignorance is not a plus. Idiot.

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As you know from your long and failed history of
> trying to find one, there are no lies of mine
> here.

As you know full well from the actual evidence presented here in the form of links to data, images and the historical record. I have found many.

Your inability to substantiate your claims only further confirm your lies.

> It is a FACT that you lied about the
> weather,

On the one hand, I have presented links to NWS data. On the other, you haven't.

Who do you think comes out ahead in that one? The guy with links that substantiate his claims or the guy who provides absolutely nothing?

> and also that you have ADMITTED to never
> having seen either thr CMYK street view

You haven't seen them either. I have provided a link or image to EVERY townhouse on Park Avenue between Pennsylvania and Virginia. You've provided nothing.

Who do you think comes out ahead in that one? The guy with links that substantiate his claims or the guy who provides absolutely nothing?

> or The
> Broad Street of 1986-97.

I've seen no evidence of it in the historical record. On the other hand, the historical record is replete with references to Broad Street Grill being located at 132 W. Broad St.

Who do you think comes out ahead in that one? The guy with links that substantiate his claims or the guy who provides absolutely nothing?

As someone noted earlier, you really do have nothing. You've been sleeping with the fishes for quite some time now. LOL!

What did you do to your sidekick, Kill Shot? Was he sent off to the sock-puppet cemetery after a mere three days because of his disastrous IT fuck-ups?

As you know all to well by now, I have no need for sockpuppets nor do I use them.

All I need are the data, images and historical record. They do just fine when kicking your feeble ass. You have none of that so you just spout more bullshit.

But as for IT fuck-ups, I believe it is you who doesn't know how to right click on the images and inspect, copy image address, or open image in new tab. That's a pretty big fuck-up.

None of that is enough to distract from your disastrous lies and inability to substantiate your claims though.

^^^ So thoroughly feeble. You and your boy just got your balls cut off on HTML matters by a guy whose actual specialties are finance and economics. You just have no standing in any of these matters at all. Sad.

Well then you must just be complete shit since he's kicking your old ass badly.

Yet, the self proclaimed expert doesn't know how to right click on the images and inspect, copy image address, or open image in new tab. I don't claim to be an expert, but even I know how to do that.

Unlike you, I also know how to tell the truth. As a reminder, actual evidence prove you lied multiple times.

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What did you do to your sidekick, Kill
> Shot? Was he sent off to the sock-puppet
> cemetery after a mere three days because of his
> disastrous IT fuck-ups?


Oh, you want me abuse you more old man?

Bring it.

LOL!



^ YASP

Careful! You keep talking like that he's likely to bring out the "big bad boot" and put it you know where!

Yeah, the fox picture came out really well. So did the plan to trick you into posting as Kill Shot again. Freaking sock-puppet dope.

While it's discernible that it's a photo of a fox, it is hardly a good photo.

Again, as you know all to well by now, I have no need for sockpuppets nor do I use them.

All I need are the data, images and historical record. They do just fine when kicking your feeble ass. You have none of that so you just spout more bullshit.

But as for IT fuck-ups, I believe it is you who doesn't know how to right click on the images and inspect, copy image address, or open image in new tab. That's a pretty big fuck-up.

None of that is enough to distract from your disastrous lies and inability to substantiate your claims though.

Well the poor Whiffies are way worse that merely one-upped here this morning. That much is clear, and so are the facts that they lied about FLA weather during their foolish Xmas visit, and that they have never seen either the CMYK street view or The Broad Street in George Mason Row. Lying losers is all that these wussies amount to.

Folks of quite a different sort are those to be found out here in the very special Sweet Spot. Rather than some bunch of uneducated stooges and steamers, we have home after upscale home of the beautiful; people -- those of skill and talent who worked hard and rose to the very top of one field or another. Some are retired now, and some are still working, but all of them are at a level that so many back east will simply never come to know or see. Especially, if you count all their many sock-puppets.

It was in any case a pleasant 63 degrees outside when I got up, and once again, we have all sun all the time. Fortunately, we have all air conditioning all the time available as well, as natural highs for the day are going to be in the mid to upper 80s. No wildlife of note was spotted during the daily trip out and back to claim the motning papaer, but just a hint fo a indeed sweat was worked up on the retuen leg. Might decide to sit out in the shade of the front porch for a while later and just watch the world go by, but the perfect climate of the TV room will certainly beckon as well.

Real President Joe will address a sort of joint session of Congress ar 9:00 EDT this evening, though it won't be as joint as usual, as in light of COVID, the Capitol physician has stated that only 200 members should be in the hall. He's not expected to hit any third-rail notions, but instead stick to important and popular bits INCLSUING such as expanded childcare and paid family leave, each end of the Pre-K to Community College scale, and also better SNAP and Obamacare benefits. The GOP will mock its racist self by sending token black Sen. Tim Scott (R_SC) out to mouth a response. He's not usually Trumpish at all, but for how long will he be able to get away with that?

In other news, the fading of Max Scherzer as some auto=-lock mechanism continued last night in downtown Dunedin, as TOR and Vlad Guerrero got to him for seven runs (two of them unearned) in just five iffy innings. All told, Vlad Jr had three bombs on the night and seven RBIs. Trea Turner hiw two out for the Nats and that Zimmerman guy added one of his own, but the visitors went down by a count of 9-5. DH Josh Bell went 0-4 and is now hitting .109 on the year. We'll try again tonight with Erick Fedde going against former Met Steven Matz, the first pitcher in 2021 to amass four W's. Our offense may not frighten him much.

Always scary of course is life anywhere within the horror story of Falls Church City. FCCPS has now decided though that the former George Mason HS will now be known as Meridian HS, while one time Thomas Jefferson ES will become Oak Street ES. Pretty much a case of no guts and lost opportunities there.

seven figure city... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> While it's discernible that it's a photo of a fox,
> it is hardly a good photo.

Catching him just at the moment when the sun peeked out from behind the clouds and made his orange coat glow like that was definitely a coup.

> Again, as you know all to well by now, I have no
> need for sockpuppets nor do I use them.

The record suggests that you are yet again lying out your ass with that claim. It's never a surprise when some phony replica of a poster shows up here to mouth your own failed party line. As easy to spot as a black ball in an urn of white ones.

> But as for IT fuck-ups, I believe it is you who
> doesn't know how to right click on the images and
> inspect, copy image address, or open image in new
> tab. That's a pretty big fuck-up.

It's stupid. desperate over-reach by an IT-ignorant asshole who's yet again had the living crap kicked out of him. It's flow-codes and session cookies all over again. Asshole.

So you're going to try to play the my pictures look great game again? LOL

It's a shitty pic like all of the rest of your shitty pics.

What kind of shitty phone do you have?

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Catching him just at the moment when the sun
> peeked out from behind the clouds and made his
> orange coat glow like that was definitely a coup.

None of the attributes you claim are present in the photo you posted. It is only slightly better quality than the infamous Bigfoot photo.

> The record suggests that you are yet again lying
> out your ass with that claim.

The record confirms that you've been making this bogus claim for years. What isn't clear is if you remain this woefully stupid to keep making it or you know it is false and continue to make it because your fragile ego won't let you acknowledge your blunder. Only you can answer that.

> It's never a
> surprise when some phony replica of a poster shows
> up here to mouth your own failed party line. As
> easy to spot as a black ball in an urn of white
> ones.

What isn't a surprise is for people to see you for what you are - a lying fraud. It is rather obvious and it shouldn't surprise you that multiple people mock and taunt you for it.

> It's stupid. desperate over-reach by an
> IT-ignorant asshole who's yet again had the living
> crap kicked out of him.

I admit to being no IT expert, but if you knew how to right click on the images and inspect, copy image address, or open image in new tab, how did you arrive at the conclusion that someone distorted your images?

If, as you say, you knew how to do that, you would have immediately recognized the fact that those images were, in fact, the images YOU posted. They were merely embedded as is in another post.

In essence, you are admitting you lied when you accused others of distorting your photos. Someone with your supposed skills in the field would not make such an egregious error.

So, are you an ignorant fool or a lying fraud? Your own statements indicate those are the only two possibilities.

Not only are you a completely fictional entity with no existence independet of the Seven Figure Stupid Shit, but you have no clue at all as to the photographic capacities of a typical 21st century cellphone as commonly used. Dope.

PS. You fucked with the menu photo. Which is why there were such discrepancies as against the original. Pinus loses again.

LOL! Nobody fucked with your image you dumb motherfucker.

You posted the exact same pic again.

I knew you would. That was why I baited you into posting it.

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not only are you a completely fictional entity
> with no existence independet of the Seven Figure
> Stupid Shit, but you have no clue at all as to the
> photographic capacities of a typical 21st century
> cellphone as commonly used. Dope.

Sure I do. I also know that any distortions to the photos or the truth come from you and you alone.

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> PS. You fucked with the menu photo. Which is why
> there were such discrepancies as against the
> original. Pinus loses again.


Nope. But please explain, Mr. IT Expert, how I hacked this website or your account to fuck with the menu photo in your original post.

Discrepancies don’t lie, Linus. Your version should have been identical to the original. You have claimed both that it was and wasn’t. Typical douchebaggery.

The only one lying here is you. Hardly new.

Is this the image you uploaded in March of last year?

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.php?2,file=404385,filename=here_ya_go_asshole_4.JPG

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Discrepancies don’t lie, Linus. Your version
> should have been identical to the original. You
> have claimed both that it was and wasn’t.
> Typical douchebaggery.


We both posted links to your own image which was uploaded in your own original post.

You posted the exact same image the second time.

There are no "discrepancies."

Do I need to show those to you again?

You understand how HTML links work right "expert?' lol

Let's see what lie or deflection he will use to try and weasel his way out of this one.

Was it blurry or was it not blurry?

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Was it blurry or was it not blurry?


You'll get an answer to that question once you answer the following question.

Is this the image you uploaded in March of last year?

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.php?2,file=404385,filename=here_ya_go_asshole_4.JPG

Yes, all of your pics look like shit.

Which we told you when you posted it/them.

Both times for the menu. Which I knew it would be and why I told you to post it again you stupid fuck.

LOL

seven figure city.... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Was it blurry or was it not blurry?
>
>
> You'll get an answer to that question once you
> answer the following question.
>
> Is this the image you uploaded in March of last
> year?
>
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.php?2
> ,file=404385,filename=here_ya_go_asshole_4.JPG


Better... point him to his original post with the attached image.

Yes, he'll still whine and babble.

Kill Shot Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> seven figure city.... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Was it blurry or was it not blurry?
> >
> >
> > You'll get an answer to that question once you
> > answer the following question.
> >
> > Is this the image you uploaded in March of last
> > year?
> >
> >
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.php?2
>
> > ,file=404385,filename=here_ya_go_asshole_4.JPG
>
>
> Better... point him to his original post with the
> attached image.
>
> Yes, he'll still whine and babble.

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/3081058/3316121.html#msg-3316121

There it is. I've provided it before and yes, all he did was whine and babble.

If it was blurry, you fucked with it. If it was not blurry, what were you complaining about? FYI, this is what liars trapping themselves between a rock and a hard place looks like. Losers.

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If it was blurry, you fucked with it. If it was
> not blurry, what were you complaining about? FYI,
> this is what liars trapping themselves between a
> rock and a hard place looks like. Losers.

It's simple yes or no questions. Only liars can't answer it.

Is this your post from March of last year where you first uploaded the menu image?

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/3081058/3316121.html#msg-3316121

Is this the image from that post?

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.php?2,file=404385,filename=here_ya_go_asshole_4.JPG

Be a man and answer yes or no.

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If it was blurry, you fucked with it. If it was
> not blurry, what were you complaining about? FYI,
> this is what liars trapping themselves between a
> rock and a hard place looks like. Losers.


There is no "if." It very obviously is blurry. Which you already admitted earlier.

Nobody "fucked with it" other than you. It's YOUR OWN FUCKING POST you idiot. It was blurry from the moment that you posted it. Which we told you at the time.

Dumbshit. LOL

seven figure city.... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
>
> > But please explain, Mr. IT Expert, how I
> hacked this website or your account to fuck with
> the menu photo in your original post.


You don't seem to understand. Old Pottymouth has many citations, awards, honors, acknowledgements & many advanced degrees. This means he's an expert. No matter what it is, he's an expert. Just lookit how he dazzles us with his knowledge of gerundry. That's why we call him "Gerund Boy".

Don't you feel better now you understand?

You fucked with it, asshole. The original is not blurry, your asshole version is. No further explanation is necessary.

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You fucked with it, asshole. The original is not
> blurry, your asshole version is. No further
> explanation is necessary.


He fucked with YOUR OWN POST?

Is that really what you're going with now? LOL

And give up with your dumb equivocation around "original." Everyone sees though your bullshit.

Is the image that YOU attached to YOUR OWN POST here blurry or not:

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/3081058/3316121.html#msg-3316121

Let's try this again.

Is this your post, authored from your registered account, from March of last year where you first uploaded the menu image?

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/3081058/3316121.html#msg-3316121

Yes or no.

Is this the image found in that post?

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.php?2,file=404385,filename=here_ya_go_asshole_4.JPG

Yes or no.

Why are these questions so difficult for you to answer? Is your bran that addled?

*** Bonus round ***

Is the same image that YOU reposted again here blurry or not?

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/3081058/3622524.html#msg-3622524

Only if you fucked with it, douche.

And, we will try this yet again.

Is this your post, authored from your registered account, from March of last year where you first uploaded the menu image?

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/3081058/3316121.html#msg-3316121

Yes or no.

Is this the image found in that post?

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.php?2,file=404385,filename=here_ya_go_asshole_4.JPG

Yes or no.

Why are these questions so difficult for you to answer? Is your bran that addled?

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Only if you fucked with it, douche.


Make a screen capture of YOUR post as it appears on YOUR device:

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/3081058/3316121.html#msg-3316121

Post it.

Make a screen capture of YOUR second post as it appears on YOUR device:

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/3081058/3622524.html#msg-3622524

Post it.

You think he'll post a screen shot? He won't even admit it is his post from March of last year. Even he knows how fucked he is. Talk about twisting in the wind. He personifies it.

seven figure city.... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You think he'll post a screen shot? He won't even
> admit it is his post from March of last year. Even
> he knows how fucked he is. Talk about twisting in
> the wind. He personifies it.


No, just making his obvious bullshit more obvious.

And I did not think you expected him to do it. I am just piling on the obviousness you are making more obvious.

The obvious fact is that he is a lying fraud and a sniveling coward.

seven figure city.... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And, we will try this yet again.
>
> Is this your post, authored from your registered
> account, from March of last year where you first
> uploaded the menu image?
>
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/308
> 1058/3316121.html#msg-3316121
>
> Yes or no.
>
> Is this the image found in that post?
>
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.php?2
> ,file=404385,filename=here_ya_go_asshole_4.JPG
>
> Yes or no.
>
> Why are these questions so difficult for you to
> answer? Is your bran that addled?

Can you please do it at your early hour wake ups as I make you get trouble by the facts that haunt you?

Kill Shot Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Make a screen capture of YOUR second post
> as it appears on YOUR device:

By screen capture, i assume you meant a screenshot, which is of course simply a photo. The menu from Cafe Chardonnay is ALREADY a photo, and the purpose of taking photos of photos has been left unclear. This particular photo was taken on March 12, 2020, due to the difficulty of reading small print in the dim light of dinnertime in an upscale restaurant. While taken with a mere cellphone camera, the photo is not blurry. Any blurriness seen in any downstream version of the photo has arisen because some low-life dimbulb fucked with it.

Is this your post, authored from your registered account, from March of last year where you first uploaded the menu image?

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/3081058/3316121.html#msg-3316121

Yes or no.

Is this the image found in that post?

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.php?2,file=404385,filename=here_ya_go_asshole_4.JPG

Yes or no.

Why are these questions so difficult for you to answer? Is your bran that addled?

Well, we've seen one Whiffie mindlessly bantering with his own phony, reborn on demand and still dickless sock puppet, but nothing more credible or sensible coming out of FCC than that. It's pretty pathetic, but these dopes are known for being nothing but lying pathetic slimeballs. The Sweet Spot meanwhile is known for hosting just the best of the best, and today will only underscore that notion, as it was nothing but gorgeous outside when I got up. Bright sun, gentle breezes, and a cool 66 degrees. Might have A little band of morning showers moving through at some point, but it was clear and cool and bright and sunny when I stepped out to go get the morning paper. No wildlife encountered out there, but the trees and shrubs are about all in bloom now, making for a very impressive scene out there. We should hit the mid 80s again today, but a front is bearing down on us and some thunder storms may be headed our way this evening and overnight. Perhaps I'll make a nice warming pot of chili this afternoon.

Real President Joe has had a similarly positive effect on the US economy, as the latest GDP reports make clear that America is indeed on the move again. He also scored well in his first speech to a joint session of Congress, noting that having the government solve problems is much better than having nobody solve problems. Morons in the backward GOP will of course try to dispute that. The stooges.

In other news, RHP Anibal Sanchez (37) is expected to sign any day now, but with whom is still a mystery. The Nats could plug him in for the short-term, but with Fedde throwing well and Lester on the mend, it's not any sort of big deal to sign him. Speaking of Fedde, he tossed six innings of two-hit ball at a very solid TOR lineup last night and came out on the long end of an 8-2 final score. Zimm and Castro combined to plate three in the third off Steven Matz, and Josh Harrison ripped a 3-run homer in the 4th. Normally hapless of late Josh Bell cracked a 2-run jack in the 5th, and the deal was sealed. Pretty impressive for Fedde (now 2-2) as he tries to erase some bad memories from earlier in the year. The club is off again today, but will be back in action Friday against The Fish at Nats Park. We could overtake them and seize 4th place with a win.

Not overtaking anyone at all of course are the dismal denizens of failing Falls Church City. On a positive note of sorts, the (almost) annual FCC Women's Wakl will return this Sunday, and part of its' nearly 2-mile course will be along newly engraved sidewalk panels on S Maple Ave that record local female factoids. To my knowledge, none of them records the fact that FCC women have no better access to actual shopping and dining amenities than men, and no access to an actual chicken place at all.

Strange that this seems so difficult for him....

Is this your post, authored from your registered account, from March of last year where you first uploaded the menu image?

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/3081058/3316121.html#msg-3316121

Yes or no.

Is this the image found in that post?

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.php?2,file=404385,filename=here_ya_go_asshole_4.JPG

Yes or no.

Why are these questions so difficult for you to answer? Is your bran that addled?

......Well, not so strange if he is a lying fraud.

seven figure city.... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why are these questions so difficult for you to
> answer? Is your bran that addled?

Eat shit, Linus, you worthless asshole. If the photo is blurry, it is because you fucked with it like the sorry-ass lying loser you have always been,. If the photo is not blurry, what the hell have you been complaining over like some spoiled brat little girl whose dolly has had her feelings hurt?

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Kill Shot Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Make a screen capture of YOUR second
> post
> > as it appears on YOUR device:
>
> By screen capture, i assume you meant a
> screenshot, which is of course simply a photo.
> The menu from Cafe Chardonnay is ALREADY a photo,
> and the purpose of taking photos of photos has
> been left unclear. This particular photo was
> taken on March 12, 2020, due to the difficulty of
> reading small print in the dim light of dinnertime
> in an upscale restaurant. While taken with a mere
> cellphone camera, the photo is not blurry. Any
> blurriness seen in any downstream version of the
> photo has arisen because some low-life dimbulb
> fucked with it.


It's blurry as fuck and that's because you uploaded a blurry pic. Nobody but you fucked with anything.

A capture of your screen will show that it's blurry as fuck for you as it is for everyone else. You already admitted that it was stupid.

Post it.

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> seven figure city.... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Why are these questions so difficult for you to
> > answer? Is your bran that addled?
>
> Eat shit, Linus, you worthless asshole. If the
> photo is blurry, it is because you fucked with it
> like the sorry-ass lying loser you have always
> been,.

How did I fuck with an image in YOUR post?

> If the photo is not blurry, what the hell
> have you been complaining over like some spoiled
> brat little girl whose dolly has had her feelings
> hurt?

Of course it is blurry. It has ALWAYS been blurry in this forum.

So, you can't answer these questions.

Is this your post, authored from your registered account, from March of last year where you first uploaded the menu image?

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/3081058/3316121.html#msg-3316121

Yes or no.

Is this the image found in that post?

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.php?2,file=404385,filename=here_ya_go_asshole_4.JPG

Yes or no.

If you were being truthful, answering these questions wouldn't pose such a challenge.

Eat shit, Linus-1 and Linus-2 (LOL!), as you are both just the same worthless lame-brained asshole. To the point, if the photo you see is blurry, it is because you fucked with it like the sorry-ass lying loser you have always been. If the photo is not blurry, what the hell have you been complaining over like some spoiled brat little girl whose dolly has had her feelings hurt? Pussies.

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Kill Shot Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Make a screen capture of YOUR second
> post
> > as it appears on YOUR device:
>

> Any
> blurriness seen in any downstream version of the
> photo has arisen because some low-life dimbulb
> fucked with it.


OK, so Old Pottymouth admits he's "lowlife dimbulb" since he's the only 1 who "effed with" the piccie. The only prob. with that, there, Mr. Pottymouth is we ALREADY KNOW you're a lowlife dimbulb. You prove it every day on FFXU. You're even dumber than Gerry on the Off Topic forum. You gotta work real hard to be dumber than Gerry cause he's a REAL DUMBASS, but you've managed it, Old Pottymouth. In fact both of you got a potty mouth typical of a 5th grader.

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eat shit, Linus-1 and Linus-2 (LOL!), as you are
> both just the same worthless lame-brained asshole.

No. Just no. It is long past the time you realized that more than one person routinely mock and taunt you for your lies and blunders. Perhaps you do realize it and your fragile ego just can't let you say it out loud. You aren't doing yourself any favors by refusing to recognize that you are the butt of many people's jokes.

> To the point, if the photo you see is blurry, it
> is because you fucked with it like the sorry-ass
> lying loser you have always been.

The photo is blurry. It has always been blurry since the moment YOU uploaded it to YOUR post of March of last year. YOU posted a blurry photo. End of story.

Would you like me to explain why the photo YOU posted looks blurry?

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eat shit, Linus-1 and Linus-2 (LOL!), as you are
> both just the same worthless lame-brained asshole.
> To the point, if the photo you see is blurry, it
> is because you fucked with it like the sorry-ass
> lying loser you have always been. If the photo is
> not blurry, what the hell have you been
> complaining over like some spoiled brat little
> girl whose dolly has had her feelings hurt?
> Pussies.



There is no "if."

A screen capture will show that.

Post it you little bitch. lol

No sale, Linus you pathetic, low-grade asshole shit-slinger. The original image is and always was blur-free until it was uploaded. Once you had access to it, all manner of loser bullshit may have happened, only further confirming what a useless, miscreant dope you are.

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No sale, Linus you pathetic, low-grade asshole
> shit-slinger. The original image is and always
> was blur-free until it was uploaded. Once you had
> access to it, all manner of loser bullshit may
> have happened, only further confirming what a
> useless, miscreant dope you are.


So you're admitting now that it's fucked up however YOU uploaded it.

Good, now you're making some progress.

Nobody else had "access" to your image(s) (all of which look shitty) other than viewing here and posting links to YOUR OWN POSTS. Which simply display what YOU posted.

What the "original" in whatever form(s) it may exist on your phone is irrelevant. Trying to weasel-word things is obvious and doesn't help you any.

And everyone here knows this, including you.

Bitch. lol

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No sale, Linus you pathetic, low-grade asshole
> shit-slinger. The original image is and always
> was blur-free until it was uploaded.

YOU uploaded it, dumbfuck.

This is an embedding of YOUR upload:




It is blurry because YOU uploaded a blurry photo.

Too fucked up to understand the questions, much less the answers. By what means does a perfectly good image file become blurred in being attached to a post? Answer: There is no such means. Ergo, all fucking up that was done was done by you on the far side, you sorry sack of shit. Reminder: context menus are part of a GUI or an app, not any version of HTML, something that is on the long, long list of things you know so very, very little about.

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Too fucked up to understand the questions, much
> less the answers. By what means does a perfectly
> good image file become blurred in being attached
> to a post? Answer: There is no such means.

And yet, your uploaded image is blurred. You lying dumbfuck.

> Ergo, all fucking up that was done was done by you
> on the far side, you sorry sack of shit.

So, it is your contention that I blurred the image in your post? Seriously?

How did I manage to do that?

> Reminder: context menus are part of a GUI or an
> app, not any version of HTML,

Who said it was?

Would an HTML expert know how to right click on an image inserted into a message using an HTML tag and inspect, copy image address, or open image in new tab?

Yeah, you couldn't figure that out.

> something that is on
> the long, long list of things you know so very,
> very little about.

Yet, according to you, I am IT savvy enough to distort an image in your post. That would take a great amount of skill, would it not?

seven figure city.... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It is blurry because YOU uploaded a blurry photo.

Go fuck yourself, Linus. Like your other distorted impostor versions, this one is nothing like the original that I of course have sitting right here. You are and never have been anything more than a shameless shit-slinging fraud and general asshole with one very big and very bad boot up your flabby butt.

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Too fucked up to understand the questions, much
> less the answers. By what means does a perfectly
> good image file become blurred in being attached
> to a post? Answer: There is no such means.
> Ergo, all fucking up that was done was done by you
> on the far side, you sorry sack of shit.

You posted a shitty poor quality image. By the objective properties of the image file it is a shitty pic. As ALL of you shitty pics are. Why do you expect us to figure out how you fuck posting them?

But you're now conceding that the image as posted here is fucked up. Good. So that's settled.

Now we just need to figure out why you take and/or post shitty pics.



> Reminder: context menus are part of a GUI or an
> app, not any version of HTML, something that is on
> the long, long list of things you know so very,
> very little about.

Reminder: You twisted what he said about context menus to begin with. Had nothing to do with HTML. Then you asked a question not understanding that there were context menus in HTML 5. You got schooled. Again.

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> seven figure city.... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > It is blurry because YOU uploaded a
> blurry photo.
>
> Go fuck yourself, Linus. Like your other
> distorted impostor versions, this one is nothing
> like the original that I of course have sitting
> right here.

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/3081058/3316121.html#msg-3316121

This IS the original. YOU posted it. It IS blurry.

How could I possibly blur an image YOU uploaded?

He's gone way beyond the watercolor fuck up with this one now. lol

Discrepancies abound, you pathetic horse’s ass. You’re just wasting your time and breath with this crap. There is no progress at all that you can make here. The original image is pitch perfect, and the slop you put up is totally trashed. What a thoroughly low-class joke you are.

Then why can't you post it "pitch perfect?"

Are you that fucking dumb that you can't figure out how to post a simple fucking image?

But then you said that it was "pitch perfect" when you posted it here. Which we all know is bullshit. And you say that all of your other shitty pics are perfectly fine.

The "slop" (btw which NOW you concede is slop and totally trashed) are your own images as posted here. All that we've done is link to them. You don't have to rely on our links. You can look at your own posts where you attached them and they're the same.

Want me to post a good one from my phone to show you how it's done? lmao

Let's recap.

This is your original post:

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/3081058/3316121.html#msg-3316121

This is the URL for the image you uploaded to that post.

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.php?2,file=404385,filename=here_ya_go_asshole_4.JPG

This is that very image without any adulteration whatsoever embedded in this post.



Right click on it, copy image address, and paste it here if you don't believe me.

Dude, if your goal is to look like a total fucking moron, you've exceeded that goal.

seven figure city.... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Dude, if your goal is to look like a total fucking
> moron, you've exceeded that goal.


He's finally jumped the shark. LOL!

Kill Shot Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He's gone way beyond the watercolor fuck up with
> this one now. lol


Yeah, he has really shit all over the bed. I have to wonder if this is all on the up and up though. Nobody can really be this dumb. I am beginning to think he fancies himself some sort of Andy Kaufman and this is all just an act. He's just really shitty at it. Nobody can tell such obvious lies and actually expect people to believe them.

That or some form of dementia.

Only reasonable explanations at this point.

Well, a few weeks ago, someone claiming to be a mental health professional indicated the lying fraud suffered from dementia. I halfway thought it was his way of indirectly begging for mercy. Who knows? Maybe that person was onto something. Dementia or not, the douche is still a massive asshole.

Actually, LINUS = BUTTHURT ASSHOLE perfectly covers the whole nine yards of it. Stupid weakling shit.

To recap for the mentally challenged.

This is your original post:

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/3081058/3316121.html#msg-3316121

This is the URL for the image you uploaded to that post.

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.php?2,file=404385,filename=here_ya_go_asshole_4.JPG

This is that very image without any adulteration whatsoever embedded in this post.



Right click on it, copy image address, and paste it here if you don't believe me.

At what point did I distort your image?

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Actually, LINUS = BUTTHURT ASSHOLE perfectly
> covers the whole nine yards of it. Stupid
> weakling shit.


You're so fucking pitiful. lol

Just walk away dombshit.

You're making yourself look (even more) like a fool.

To recap for criminally involved liars and weakling assholes, the original image is sharp and crystal clear. Your freakishly distorted imitations are none of that. Fraud.

To further put the big bad boot up your sorry lying butts, the original image remains sharp and clear even when majorly magnified. How is it that you can't manage that with any of your phony-photos? Shit-slinging fools.
.
Attachments:

They are YOUR photos! Are you not familiar with how HTML tags work? You are a self-proclaimed expert.

This is your original post:

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/3081058/3316121.html#msg-3316121

There is no question about that. You authored it from your registered account.

This is the URL for the image you uploaded to that post.

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.php?2,file=404385,filename=here_ya_go_asshole_4.JPG

There is no question about that. All one has to do is click on the image to see that.

This is that very image without any adulteration whatsoever embedded in this post. I use < img src= > without the space. Here is what we get.



You can right click the above and click on "copy image address" to see that is the case.

Or, you can simply quote my post to see it.

I dare you to quote my post, pussy.

Your newly created image does nothing to change that fact.

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> To further put the big bad boot up your sorry
> lying butts, the original image remains sharp and
> clear even when majorly magnified. How is it that
> you can't manage that with any of your
> phony-photos? Shit-slinging fools.
> .


That one is fine.

But that's not what you posted, sorry.

Should have posted that to begin with and saved your old ass another beating. Why you have to make a fool of yourself trying to deny the obvious, I don't know.

The obvious is that you shitheads haven’t got the first clue of what your trying to talk about. Fuck this up, fuck that up...high five! Assholes, assholes, assholes.

Don't even try idiot. LOL

Everyone reading this thread can see that the images that you posted in your earlier posts are blurry as fuck. You now have admitted the same.

What you may have elsewhere that you're calling the "original" isn't of any relevance or interest.

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The obvious is that you shitheads haven’t got
> the first clue of what your trying to talk about.
> Fuck this up, fuck that up...high five! Assholes,
> assholes, assholes.


http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/3081058/3316121.html#msg-3316121

Embed the image found in your post above (if you know how to do that) in your next post.

Let's see what we get.

Kill Shot Wrote:
--------------------------------------------------
> That one is fine. But that's not what you posted, sorry.

It’s EXACTLY what I posted previously. Twice. There is but one original file, and but one way to attach and post. Low grade dope.

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Kill Shot Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > That one is fine. But that's not what you
> posted, sorry.
>
> It’s EXACTLY what I posted previously. Twice.
> There is but one original file, and but one way to
> attach and post. Low grade dope.


Bzzzzzttt.... Obviously false.

You may be using the same "original" as your source but it very clearly is not "EXACTLY" what you posted previously.

There may be "but one way to attach and post" but what you have attached is not the same as that posted previously.

It's not even the entire image as the former are.

Next stupid thing that you'd like to be bitch slapped for?

Why does it have a different file name?

I notice you didn't embed your original image, Mr. HTML expert.

Don't know how or know it will only expose you as a lying fraud?

JP is a lying shithead. Actual evidence has proven as much

Kill Shot Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bzzzzzttt.... Obviously false.

Obviously too stupid to understand graphics. You might as well claim that context menus are a part of HTML.

> It's not even the entire image as the former are.

Of course not. The point was to note the stability of the original file when magnified, a property somehow not exhibited by your corrupt versions of the image.

seven figure city... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why does it have a different file name?

Good Lord! Do you not understand file naming conventions either? That while an extension is apt to have technical relevance, filenames are typically just whatever strikes an author's fancy at the time? Lots different back in the days of mandatory 8.3 of course, but things are very different today, as those who have kept up would know.

Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Kill Shot Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Bzzzzzttt.... Obviously false.
>
> Obviously too stupid to understand graphics. You
> might as well claim that context menus are a part
> of HTML.
>
> > It's not even the entire image as the former
> are.
>
> Of course not. The point was to note the
> stability of the original file when magnified, a
> property somehow not exhibited by your corrupt
> versions of the image.


So it's "EXACTLY" the same, but it's not "EXACTLY" the same huh? LOL

Whatever resized, lower-resolution/quality, cropped, renamed derivative file that you create from your "original" is not "EXACTLY" the same.

There are no other versions of your images. They all are your own. All that has been posted here are links to your own images in your own posts.

You can't really be this fucking stupid.

Kill Shot Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Kill Shot Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > >
> >
> >
>
> >
>
> >
> >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> You can't really be this fucking stupid.


Yes he can. Remember, you're dealing with Gerund Boy, here. Some people call him "Dimwit". There's a reason for it.

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/3081058/3316121.html#msg-3316121

Embed the image found in your post above (if you know how to do that) in your next post.

Let's see what we get.

^^^ Fucking caught-redhanded idiots.

Red handed doing what? Embedding the EXACT image YOU posted? Yup, you caught us! Good job!

Well, the Whiffies may have started their weekend drinking a little early, but those of us of a more sober bent remain logically and intellectually engaged. We note for instance that it was 59 degrees when I first got up, with lots of sun and next to no chance of rain at all. We will have to deal with some gusty winds over much of the afternoon and evening though -- steady at 20-25 mph with gusts of twice that possible. We have a post-COVID visit with friends in the Frederick, MD, area on tap for this afternoon. We're looking at high temps in the upper 60s, but if the winds are as forecast, I imagine we'll be spending most of that time indoors. No such bluster at the moment though, as it was refreshingly cool and breezy during my venture out and back to bring in the morning paper. A fox had been lurking near the bird feeders, but he scampered out the back way at the sound of my approach. No doves, squirrels, or chipmunks for him just yet.

It's $35 billion for Real President Joe's drinking and waste water infrastructure bill though, as even many Senate dummies joined in an 89-2 vote to get EPA moving on these matters. We'll see which, if any, infrastructure measures these GOP losers and low-lifes end up branding themselves by voting against.

In other news, the Nats were off on Thursday and will face The Fish tonight at Nats Park. Pretty good Pablo Lopez should be on the hill for MIA, but the Nats have the starting slot on hold. Meanwhile, MIL called up one-time Nats ace RHP Jordan Zimmermann and COL called up 1B Matt Adams, but CLE rather surprisingly DFA's LHP Oliver Perez, who once dropped down perhaps the most famous bunt in Nats' history. Another former Nats lefty, Jerry Blevins, has decided to retire at age 37, while ex-Nat RHP Trevor Gott (28) was outrighted by SFG after clearing waivers.

Not many claims have been placed on anyone or anything in poor old Falls Church City either. The City is moving ahead with expenditures on police body cameras though. This could become important if the Very Little City ever decides to crack down on wanton breakage of the rules of English grammar and syntax. Worse yet if online image-tampering ever comes under scrutiny.

seven figure city... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Red handed doing what? Embedding the EXACT image
> YOU posted? Yup, you caught us! Good job!


And letting him make a fool of himself in the process.

ooops, he caught me again. Taken straight from his post with no distortion at all! LOL! All one needs to do is right click or quote my post to see that!

If you hadn't fucked with the image, it would look the same up there as it does down here -- clear as a bell, and proof positive that the wife and I were at Spring Training at exactly the time and place that I reported. It's all just lose-lose for you, asshole.Just as with the Water Wars, the Chicken Wars, and so many other terrible tragedies that have befallen you here. Dope.

Dude, the image is EXACTLY as you posted it. It is only proof that you or someone you know has access to a computer and a printer.

What were the chicken wars again?










(baiting him into such nonsense is so easy)