Of course Stu's signs don't say democrat party endorsed. They can't. He's under the Hatch Act. That's how Stu and the democrats nailed Al White when he ran in Sully against Kathy Smith. Al put the party endorsement sign on his signs, and the democrats nailed him under the Hatch Act.
Do Stu's signs this year say that he has democratic party endorsement? If so, he has made a HUGE mistake. He could lose his real job. I seriously doubt that he would be that dumb. In fact, I know that he wouldn't. He's never used party endorsement on his signs.
I am 100% certain that Stu was endorsed by the democrats in 2003. Why don't you drop him an email and ask him? I'm sure that he wouldn't mind telling you.
stugibson4sb@yahoo.com or
stuart.gibson@fcps.edu
You are quite wrong on the personal knowledge part of your argument.
You need to write to Stu about this issue because someone is lying to you about what transpired. I wouldn't want you to continue believing your source because he's lying to you. Please, write Stu and ask. He'll be honest with you. He'd never put it in writing that he was endorsed in 2003 if he wasn't. I promise you, he was endorsed each time by the democratic party. Republicans always declined to endorse him. Feel free to ask him about that too.