Re: high school redistricting
Posted by:
Thomas More
()
Date: October 21, 2007 11:05PM
quantum Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
This is the level of dialogue I have been yearning for on this blog. If only all of us could aspire to this level of exchange with every post.
> Thomas More - my daughter goes to TJ and benefits
> from the fact that she likely could not be as
> competitive as she is at the varsity level at
> another school due to TJ's lesser competitiveness
> in her sport. I think on balance she is very
> happy with the result.
I am very happy for her and for you. In a jurisdiction of 1 million people with a school district of 165,000 is there 1% of students who benefit for TJ's intensive instruction. Maybe. I didn't call for shutting TJ down.
> And I don't think the
> place lacks school spirit by any means - there is
> an intense TJ grapevine that it is difficult to
> intuit on the outside.
Humans are physical social beings. Physical presence is important. I can't tell you how often SL kids come back to support their schoolmates in their afterschool activities. It just doesn't happen at TJ. SL has played TJ for most of the last ten years. I actually felt bad for the TJ teams for their lack of support for their fellows. I understood how hard it was for the athletes' schoolmates to get back for the game. Too much travel - too much home work.
> So just as with SLHS - a
> place with both positive and negative elements - a
> balanced look is in order.
Agreed. My point is that a magnet program is not a panacia for the under-enrollment problem at SL.
> Then again, she is a student who truly belongs at
> TJ. We certainly never pushed to take the TJ
> test, study for it, or do anything of the sort -
> and she is doing exceedingly well. I have another
> daughter with SAT scores well over the TJ mean
> (yes, that high) who attends a nationally ranked
> university on an academic scholarship - she could
> have done well at TJ, but felt more comfortable at
> Oakton. She would freely admit Oakton was not
> that much work - but she is stepping up at
> university, so Oakton at least passably prepared
> her.
Your Oakton daughter made the right choice for her & still got into a challenging college that brought out the best in her.
So the in the end the problem is with
> parents who want to live vicariously through their
> kids and don't look in a focused way at where
> their child will be most happy.
Amen. Amen. Halleuja. And this is also part of the resistance to transferring some elementary school to SL. Just not enough oreceuved prestige to satisfy the parents.
> I must say some of the negative statements you
> make about TJ have kernels of truth.
Thank you.
> But make no mistake about it - TJ is
> an asset to the county - and quite bluntly, given
> the economic and intellectual contributions that
> the truly gifted make in our society, the last
> thing we want to do is chase them to private
> schools - as Darwinian as it sounds, spending
> money on the truly gifted is truly a force
> multiplier in terms of human capital.
Just like the service academies are not for everyone yet they are definitely are a necessary asset for the country. But this is only true so long as it is for the truly gifted and not another trophy chase for the overwhelming number of Type A parents in this County, which is what to many taxpayers TJ appears to have become.
>
> In any event, I do have some degree of
> apprehension about SLHS. Right now, they have 30
> IB graduates - with presumably a bandwidth of
> teacher supply consistent with that number.
> Oakton had about 130 AP graduates in my daughter's
> final year. Query whether South Lakes will have
> the bandwidth to handle the influx of students in
> terms of a supply of qualified and experienced AP
> teachers. This is not an idle question - the
> redistricting will be a reality in my view - the
> gravitational pull of racial balancing is by and
> far and away the strongest force in American
> education right now
Its more about socio-economic background than race.
>- and having a supply of
> competent AP teachers, particularly given the
> rancor that will surround the redistricting, is
> absolutely essential.
And Raiily chased so many good, veteran teachers away. This went on for more than 5 years. Gibson knew about it and did nothing for too many years which is unforgivable. This problem would exist regardless of boundaries or AP/IB.
As to the samll number of IB diplomas, in order to get the IB diploma a kid has to have at least 5 years of one foreign language, meaning a kid has to take it in 8th grade. (I can understand this for European kids for whom IB was created but English is the language of science and commerce, and not everyone's strengths is foriegn language.) Algebra 1 in the 8th grade is highly recommended. Somehow, parents of 7th graders at Hughes have not been apprised of this, so large numbers of potential IB diploma students get eliminated before they even start SL.
Then there is the limited number of teachering slots available to teach foreign languages and Alegbra I at Hughes. If the only 8th grade spanish teacher at Hughes is a lemon who can't speak English the year your child is at Hughes, your choices are no IB diploma, private tutoring or change to another language in the middle of the school year, if there's even room in that class.
Also because of the consistent euro-centrisim and socialist leaning of the materials, I prefer my kids avoid the IB program.
Then there is the problem of the scoring of the IB exams after senior year not coming back for Zurich or whereever in Switzerland until after your kid has registered for freshman college classes. Thus, making it impossible to avoiding the "intro to whatever" level class that is the very purpose of ADVANCED PLACEMENT class in the first place.
Finally teachers who have tought both AP and IB tell me that IB is less challenging than AP but requires more homework (makework).
Net, net, lots of work, lots of stress for limited pay-off at a limited number of colleges. Thus, 80-90% of SL students make the economically rational decision, it ain't worth it. Most of these 80-90%, just like your Oakton daughter, are still getting into the most selective colleges.
Sl should never have dropped AP and gone to IB. Another Railly gift.
More cordially later.