Look who's been licking his wounds for nearly 22 hours. That last ass whooping must've really hurt him.
Actual JP Morgenthau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'm sure you do have some choices to make in your
> meager life, just none so broad in scope or scale
> as what I have.
Based on what you claim here, my choices are more broad in both scope and scale. Strip-mall pizzeria and all that.
> You meanwhile run down GAR only
> to have something to say. There is not a shred of
> truth in any of your claims about GAR.
I don't like it. I've experienced poor service and poor quality food there too many times for them to receive my business. Those are facts. Not sure why it bothers you so much, but I like the fact it upsets you.
> It's known to be a nice place, which is how and
> why you chose it as the basis for your recent
> fabrication. But you have not recently if ever
> eaten there,
Sure I did. And it bothers you that you could only afford a strip-mall pizzeria.
> nor have you ever played golf at
> Burning Tree (or Coyote Moon) or dined at Victoria
> and Albert's, or met up anywhere at all with old
> law schools chums. These are all examples of your
> well-known and desperate habit of over-the-top
> lying.
LOL! It burns! You have some pent-up butthurt that just came out there!
> LOL. I live in a magnificent home on a wooded and
> much larger than average lot in one of the best
> parts of one of the best areas in NoVa.
Which you can't seem to name. LOL!
> Oh, they're real alright, just not within the
> made-up claims of your invented experience. As
> for me, I've not so far had any reason to be in
> Killington, but I have enjoyed many a five-way and
> three different MLB ballparks in Cincinnati. As
> for Tahoe, you'll remember only too well and
> painfully that we were invited to a destination
> wedding there, and that courtesy of one of the
> wife's coworkers, we had a week's free use of a
> 4-bedroom chalet in Incline Village. It was a fun
> trip. Swimming, sight-seeing, upscale dining
> aboard ship out on the lake, a little bit of
> gambling, and an exhilarating afternoon of
> white-water rafting on the Truckee River.
Nope. I had no idea that your alleged trip to Tahoe was for a wedding. I do remember you trying to pass off a stock photo of Coyote Moon as your own. That's the type of shit liars engage in.
> I think you've verschleppt your claim that Metro
> was for paupers. Bozo.
Well, there is the cost of an automobile. Dope.
> While FCC may be very different, I certainly do
> not know of any such people out this way.
What you certainly don't know is who is taking Metro these days.
> Well, door-to-door service and no worries about
> being out on the road late at night with some
> bunch of drunks. I like it.
Late at night? We we home by 9. And, I suppose you think your taxis drive on different roads? Dope.
> One of my common claims is that you are an
> unprincipled fraud, and you make it very easy to
> substantiate that. Unless of course, you've
> suddenly managed to remember the obvious but
> unusual thing about Brine, what the second means
> iof traffic-calming along Moore Avenue is, or who
> won the Water Wars.
I've described Brine to the minute detail, while you blundered on where the bar was in relation to the entrance.
I don't recall what the traffic calming measures are because I don't really care. I drive down a road and obey the signage. Simple as that. No need to commit to memory.
The side that got $40 Million in cold hard cash and total control of some of the areas most valuable and sought after real estate. Of course, you might have known this had your "preeminent local historian" bothered to complete his job and cover the issue until the end. He gave up more than a year before it ended. Your boy Nick, meanwhile, called it a blockbuster deal.
> Useless to those with neither a desire nor a
> reason to go there.
LOL! Sour grapes, eh?
> > If it were, you would be able to provide a link
> > with those directions in it.
Notice you didn't provide a link. Again, because you are lying. Happens to you all the time.
> Again with the failure to comprehend ordinary
> English usage. And in that same embarrassing
> vein, a flat-top is called a flat-top for a pretty
> much obvious reason.
So, is this a flat-top? Yes or no will suffice. Pretty simple question, but you seem to not be able to answer it. Why is that?