Re: To all County Volunter Firefighters
Posted by:
cvcyw
()
Date: May 04, 2016 08:28PM
4goodvibeu Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You have serious issues and a lot of hate. There
> is no reasoning with someone like you. You have
> your mind made up and it doesn't matter what
> anyone says you are hell bent on your point of
> view. I am not passive aggressive nor am I afraid
> to face anyone and look them in they eye. If
> either of my children or their spouses were
> cheating and I knew it beyond a doubt not just by
> rumor, I would confront them both, especially in
> this day and age of STDs. I certainly would not
> make it anyone elses business. I would do the same
> for any of my friends or family. It's a matter of
> respect and dignity.
You are wrong, period.
It is great YOU would tell / confront whoever for whatever, but irrelevant.
Here are the issues:
1. Cyberbullying - it did not happen on this site, police have stated that social media had nothing to do with her death
2. not peoples business what happened in their private life - wrong, she cheated in PUBLIC / she cheated with co-workers, nothing about those actions is private at all
3. a word used to describe her actions "slut" are mean - so what? it is an adjective describing another persons actions, the word was earned by her for breaking the law (infidelity) and fucking her co-workers, would HARLOT or FLOOZY be acceptable?
4. the victim - MSM, SJWs and people like you consider her a victim, that is logically and reasonably impossible, she was the ABUSER on all counts
5. YOU were worried about people talking at work - she created the HWE where the HUSBAND would be talked about because his wife is fucking his friend/co-workers
6. gender - it this were a male, this thread would not exist, the media would portray him as an abuser (rightfully so), no one would care that people posted that he cheated online or used mean words to describe his actions
I actually am tired and bored of educating the ignorant for now, so I will stop there.
But this:
"You have serious issues and a lot of hate."
Wrong. I use logic and reason before making conclusions on any issue or event. That does not equate to hate.
"There is no reasoning with someone like you."
Wrong. I am incredibly reasonable and have been with every post and thought. The problem you are having is actually using REASONING over FEELING. Do I like what happened? No, but that does not exclude using critical thinking to state facts and obvious truths.
" You have your mind made up and it doesn't matter what anyone says you are hell bent on your point of view."
Wrong. It does matter what other people say, but I will point out when what they are saying is incorrect.
There are such simple things in life as examples that disprove everything the MSM, SJWs, YOU and other logically blind people are trying to advocate.
If a person is a murderer, hiding they have AIDS, a child molester, armed robber, rapist, adulterer, thief, embezzler or just selling fake movie CDs on the street...............they ALL are BAD PEOPLE who are HURTING OTHER PEOPLE and it is completely IRRELLEVANT HOW they are exposed for THEIR CHOSEN ACTIONS.
THEY ARE ALL CRIMINALS and FORFIET ANY RIGHT to object to the WAY they were EXPOSED FOR THEIR CRIMES.
Get it through your fucking head that this person was hurting other people directly and indirectly. The End. How, who, when, where or why another person relayed that person's actions is completely IRELLEVANT.
What is so blatantly staring everyone in the face, but they choose to ignore, is that this person's decision to hurt others is the cause of everything that followed.
No matter how you question the "How, who, when, where or why" will it excuse the person who chose to hurt others, never.
You can suggest that posting on an online forum anon is juvenile - irrelevant, CAUSED by the person who chose to hurt others
You can suggest that it is no ones business - irrelevant, CAUSED by the person who chose to hurt others
You can suggest that the poster was passive aggressive - irrelevant, CAUSED by the person who chose to hurt others
You can suggest things were posted by a jealous male/female - irrelevant, CAUSED by the person who chose to hurt others
You can suggest that FB postings were bullying, mean or immature - irrelevant, CAUSED by the person who chose to hurt others
To really dumb this entire thing down:
BAD thing was DONE, BAD thing was EXPOSED.
How YOU, or anyone else, FEELS about the "How, who, when, where or why" is absolutely meaningless verse the simple reality that a person who was hurting others was simply exposed for their actions.