Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> themuse Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ouch. no, i'm not into rape.
> > i guess you got my attention but, do you have
> any
> > links to back that up?
> >
> > my batteries have yet to recharge since my
> > coniebashing, but i'd be interested in a
> history
> > lesson or two. history is quite the powerful
> > tool, you know? i don't understand why it's
> > rusting away at the bottom of the scrap pile in
> > this country's shed.
>
> Here was my specific objection to the issue:
>
>
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/26
> 0605/263091.html#msg-263091
>
> It had nothing to do with supporting or defending
> rape - it was the fact that the law as was applied
> was stupid.
>
> And this was my original post in regards to it - I
> was pointing out the typical spin placed on an
> issue to get everyone up in arms over something
> that was not as black and white as was being
> expressed by Jon Stewart - or Fairy here. Fairy
> just took umbrage at the fact that he declared it
> "One of the best Jon Stewart pieces ever."
>
>
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/26
> 0605/260716.html#msg-260716
> ...Typical spin. Thanks for making the point again
> as to how the MSM reports on issues like this.
>
> She should sue anyway and make the contractor
> defend it's actions there - they could counter her
> filing, but she would make the point. The contract
> said that contractors had to take issues to
> mediation/arbitration. It wasn't specifically
> about rape. The issue was brought up because of
> the rape and how it was handled, but the bill
> Franken proposed was pretty much unenforceable.
>
> Funny - the DOD and the Obama administration was
> ALSO against this. ...
>
> It was an interesting, and typical thread here.
> Once the folks with no argument had nothing to put
> up - they started accusing me of defending rape.
> Shrug.
RV, don't defend yourself against such drivel.