ReadyToTakeBackWhat'sMine Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It's time to turn the tables. > > We are so accepting of welfare recipients yelling > and screaming, rioting and killing. > > It's time for those of us who are supporting these > democrats/bloodsuckers to do the same. > > We need to riot and start killing the entitlement > c
Forum: Off-Topic

cus they had control Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Why would they fight, Dems had control of the > house and senate for about half the time. Dubbya was sworn-in in 2001. Democrats did not take control of the both the House & Senate until 2007. Dubbya left office in 2009. Really, "Dems had control of the house and senate for about a quarter of the t
Forum: Off-Topic

PPP's first post election national poll finds that GOP-tards are taking the results pretty hard...and also declining in numbers. 49% of GOP-tards nationally say they think that ACORN stole the election for President Obama. We found that 52% of GOP-tards thought that ACORN stole the 2008 election for Obama, so this is a modest decline, but perhaps smaller than might have been expected given that
Forum: Off-Topic

Thanks to my many anonymous friends here on FFU, I now understand that any increase in White House spending, no matter how small, represents an "unprecedented upsurge". I am no longer concerned.
Forum: Off-Topic

Receipt please Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > What a bunch of phony phuckers all of these guys > are. They have virtually no living expenses. Why would they need a Costco membership?
Forum: Off-Topic

wrong again, dummy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > That the documents point to an unprecedented > > upsurge in White House spending is this > person's > > opinion; it’s what s/he believes. It is > simply > > not a fact. > > No, the document apparently points to a measurable > increase that is unprecedented. Certainly it
Forum: Off-Topic

get the dictionary Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > No, it is either a fact or a lie. There is no > room for opinion. "unprecedented" has a > definition. What does it mean? having no > precedent : novel, unexampled > > "Upsurge" has a definition. What does it mean? a > rapid or sudden rise. > > Either the documents show an unexamp
Forum: Off-Topic

not difficult at all Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Mittens Having Kittens Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > GetMath Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > "But current and former government officials > > said > > > the docume
Forum: Off-Topic

GetMath Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > January 2013 cannot come soon enough when these > freeloaders are evicted from D.C. Yeah, that's not going to happen. > Simply put, the Bushs and Reagans basically did > what all of us have to do, to tighten our belts. > They did Staycations, and went home. Not the > Obama's. A 'Staycation' for the pre
Forum: Off-Topic

GetMath Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > "But current and former government officials said > the documents obtained by The Examiner point to an > unprecedented upsurge in White House spending on > such events. That documents were obtained by The Examiner is a fact. It is the OPINION of the "current and former government officials" that those documents
Forum: Off-Topic

GetMath Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If I say that the Ford Pinto is a deathtrap > waiting to happen, and then provide the numbers on > how dangerous the Pinto is, how many people it > killed and the resultant lawsuits it caused and > settled on, it doesn't invalidate the claim > because I said "that the Pinto is a deathtrap"! Thanks for this
Forum: Off-Topic

Oh, the screaming and crying and gnashing of teeth at the price tag for the Obama’s approximately $4.1 million Hawaii vacation . . . yes, it could be that the trip is costing over $4 million, with Secret Service detail, advance planning, staff, the White House press corps, and all of the perks of being President of the United States (and practically the whole frigging planet). Perhaps the crit
Forum: Off-Topic

Nuccio Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Now that Nate Silver has hit the bullseye two > Presidentail elections in a row, I'm going to > ignore all polling data and media reports in 2016 > and just follow what he has to say. +1
Forum: Off-Topic

GetMath Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Dohhs Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Mittens Having Kittens Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Doh Wrote: > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > &g
Forum: Off-Topic

It’s no secret that the Romney campaign believed it was headed for victory on Election Day. A handful of outlets have reported that Team Romney’s internal polling showed North Carolina, Florida, and Virginia moving safely into his column and that it put him ahead in a few other swing states. When combined with Ohio, where the internal polling had him close, Romney was on track to secure all the e
Forum: Off-Topic

your idiocy is unparalleled Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Nope. The truth is that a recollection from an > involved party is in fact a fact no matter how > much nonsense you will spew. It is substantiated > by the recollection of no less than three > individuals with first hand knowledge of all the > relevant facts. It is quite telling that y
Forum: Off-Topic

The truth is, that article from the Washington Examiner is rife with unsubstantiated opinions which have no basis in fact.
Forum: Off-Topic

We've spent more than enough time down your little rabbit hole. The truth is, that article from the Washington Examiner is rife with unsubstantiated opinions which have no basis in fact.
Forum: Off-Topic

Drawn and Quartered Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > He should be drawn and quartered. He's having > lunch with a muslim, black kenyan socialist who is > destroying America. > > There should be nothing done to improve the > economy or move our nation forward until an old > white republican guy is president. Don't fool > yourselves, black
Forum: Off-Topic

no way you can be this stupid Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > OMG, you are comparing predictions on events yet > to occur with recollections of events in the past? > You can't be this stupid. You are just fucking > around now, right? Please tell me you aren't > serious? Your repetitive use of ad hominem attacks serves to highlight the weakness o
Forum: Off-Topic

words of caution Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Careful Mitt, Barry will probably say he has to > go to the bathroom when the check comes. And dont > expect him to tip, we have covered that subject on > here before.
Forum: Off-Topic

3 people Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Three people are contending the spending is the > highest over the past 20 years. Three people with > direct access and knowledge of the situation. How many rightwing nut-jobs believed Mittens would win in a landslide? Dick Morris: Romney 325, Obama 213 George F. Will: Romney 321, Obama 217 Michael Barone: Romne
Forum: Off-Topic

subborn and stupid you be Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > So, sworn statements in court are "opinions"? > Wow, fucking wow you are an idiot. Mr. Walters was under oath when he made these statements? Gee, I missed where that was stated in the article.
Forum: Off-Topic

> You seriously need a dictionary. If I bought a > car in 1996 and I know it cost $25,000 that is an > opinion? What are you talking about? Mr. Walters opined; "...the costs reflected in the documents were "excessive. They are high." He further recollected; "The highest event we could remember was $190,000 to $200,000 range..." Now, if Mr. Walters had invoices to back up his assert
Forum: Off-Topic

factually speaking Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Mittens Having Kittens Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > >> No, it doesn't. Lavish compared to what? We > > don't know what any other president in the past > > twenty years spent. > > The official in question knows. "Gary Walters, > wh
Forum: Off-Topic

facts are facts Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The sentences you pointed to were facts substantiated by > documents or direct recollection of someone > involved in the process. You are mistaken. As I stated eariler (really, try to be more attentive), the spending was called 'lavish' without any basis in fact. That's called an opinion. A "direct recol
Forum: Off-Topic

Derp Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Mittens Having Kittens Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > President Obama has spent far more lavishly > on > > White House state dinners than previous chief > > executives , > > including nearly $1 million on a 2010 dinner > for > > Mexico's presi
Forum: Off-Topic

u b dumb Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Mittens Having Kittens Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > President Obama has spent far more lavishly > on > > White House state dinners than previous chief > > executives , > > Umm, the next clause substantiates it. Really, > dummy, get a diction
Forum: Off-Topic

Crony Wasteafarian Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Data for state dinner costs under Bush were > unavailable because he signed an executive order > in 2001 that put all presidential documents under > seal for five years after a chief executive leaves > office. > > Spokesmen for the presidential libraries of > Clinton and President George H
Forum: Off-Topic

President Obama has spent far more lavishly on White House state dinners than previous chief executives , including nearly $1 million on a 2010 dinner for Mexico's president, according to documents obtained by The Washington Examiner. Presidents have long used formal dinners to court foreign heads of state and to dish out fine food and wine to reward political, financial and show business celebr
Forum: Off-Topic