Removed
Forum: Off-Topic

Liberal Logic 26 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Which is the problem with science for this. Its > not science if your starting out with "facts" that > you dont have the first clue to the answer too. > Real science would just find things out as they go > and be guided by that. If you start out with an > agenda that youre going to disprove reli
Forum: Off-Topic

tomahawk Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Nobody needs to "disprove religion". It's like > trying to prove that there are no unicorns. Religions are false, and created by men. Most who purport to believe in the Bible do not. I have been just as at fault as many others have.
Forum: Off-Topic

Liberal Logic 26 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Go on with the temper tantrum mental midget. You > and numbers both crumbled as soon as you were > called on your bullshit stating opinions as fact. > I never once said what the answer is, only that a > real scientist would leave the possibility open. > Dismissing it from the start isnt science,
Forum: Off-Topic

Liberal Logic 26 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Youre wasting your time. They have no defense for > biased science based off atheism or the fact that > we dont know a single thing about the universe yet > theyre stating their opinions about it and its > creation as fact. People that crumble that > quickly arent capable of logical thought. The
Forum: Off-Topic

American Institute for Science Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Young Curmudgeon Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > That math doesn't make sense. You're > erroneously > > assuming that 10% of the population is > homosexual, > > which isn't true. Accurate figures put the > number > > arou
Forum: Off-Topic

depends Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > that depends. are you talking Ray's, Famous Ray's, > or Famous Original Ray's? Take your pick.
Forum: Off-Topic

The most succinct you can get with this stuff: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7_0NoRHOEM
Forum: Off-Topic

No seat belts, air bags, and minimal crumple zone vs. seat belts, air bags, and crumple zones. 1959 car wins in terms of aesthetics. 2009 wins in everything else. I wouldn't mind having a 50s car with modern safety features.
Forum: Off-Topic

A bit simplistic, but pretty accurate.
Forum: Off-Topic

Understanding Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Which proves what I said > You don't understand so must be gods doing..... > If it works for...... Sad really but keep praying Whatever you want to believe. Maybe you're right, and maybe you're wrong.
Forum: Off-Topic

That math doesn't make sense. You're erroneously assuming that 10% of the population is homosexual, which isn't true. Accurate figures put the number around 3-4% at highest. Kinsey's studies are demonstrably wrong. Also, 4% of the male population of the world is not 137 men. It's roughly 139 million.
Forum: Off-Topic

Understanding Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Religion explans things that we don't understand > The more we understand the less we need religion. Not particularly. I would argue the inverse is true. The more we understand, the more we realize how ridiculously complex this universe is. To me, that strengthens the argument for God.
Forum: Off-Topic

The Big Bang is a widely uncontested scientific fact. Almost all reputable scientists believe in it. As for what caused it, I think your belief or lack of belief colors your view point. If you're an atheist, you're going to believe one thing. If you're theistic, like I am, you're going to believe something else. By and large, it's circular logic. By the way, the argument equating Santa Claus wit
Forum: Off-Topic

Right, so you're telling me that eating a Red Baron pizza is the same as eating one from Ray's. Or that eating one from Romantica is the same as eating one from Pizza Hut. Try again.
Forum: Off-Topic

Road Musings Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm curious what you'd propose to address > inequality? There's no real way to address economic inequality unless you examine the factors causing it. Those factors include lack of education and lack of specialized knowledge. If you want to address inequality, you have to address the inequality in education, but
Forum: Off-Topic

The debt is shrinking to the tune of 35 billion dollars. Which is nothing, all in all.
Forum: Off-Topic

eesh... what the fuck?
Forum: Off-Topic

Finally, I want to address this graphic. The increasing income disparity coincides with the fall of organized labor. I wonder why that is...
Forum: Off-Topic

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You think Obama got a fair shake during his > presidency? George W. Bush couldn't even be > criticized for the first 6 years of his disastrous > presidency because it was deemed unpatriotic to > criticize the president, you were demonized for > it. That's how much public support for no > apparen
Forum: Off-Topic

eesh Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Who are you talking to? He's talking to me in a roundabout way.
Forum: Off-Topic

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > My gripe with you is you like to swing on that > fence with a better than thou attitude like you're > are objective. There is nothing objective about > the damage the modern Republican party has done > and is on a mission to continue to do to this > country. There's no equilibrium there between the
Forum: Off-Topic

Dane Bramage Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Speaking of thinking, last time was Creigh Deeds > and now McAulliffe? What are the Dems thinking, or > is there a lack of strong Democratic candidates in > the Commonwealth? I liked Deeds a lot, actually. I agreed with most of his positions. He had no idea how to campaign, which allowed McDonnell to win.
Forum: Fairfax County General

@partyline: Funny thing is, I'm the first (i.e. a populist, which is a Progressive in the sense of Teddy Roosevelt). Gerry thinks I'm a Conservative Republican.
Forum: Off-Topic

Bill.N. Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Try being a fiscally conservative, anti-gun > control, states rights liberal. I'm more fiscally liberal, but I get where you're coming from. All moderates are screwed.
Forum: Off-Topic

In reality, I'm this.
Forum: Off-Topic

red bullshit Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > young douche Much like another idiot, you think I'm this:
Forum: Off-Topic

This is what I really am. Intelligent people know the difference.
Forum: Off-Topic

Let me simplify it for our resident idiot. This is what he thinks I am.
Forum: Off-Topic

Eating Crow? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Doesn't the GOP support the rich and fuck the > poor. Eh, depends on how you look at it. If you look at Medicaid expansion, then yes. The government is capable of aiding people so that they can aid themselves. There's a good way to do it and a bad way to do it. Sometimes, the GOP fucks the poor. Sometimes, the
Forum: Fairfax County General