Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
Lloydster
()
Date: July 27, 2012 09:27AM
What a disaster
http://www.americablog.com/2012/07/morning-papers-in-uk-blast-romney-visit.html?m=1
I could be wrong but I'm right 99% of the time
http://www.americablog.com/2012/07/morning-papers-in-uk-blast-romney-visit.html?m=1
I could be wrong but I'm right 99% of the time
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
foxnews
()
Date: July 27, 2012 09:35AM
Foxnews said Romney slayed them and they showered him with flowers and love...nice try LIBTRADS!
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
and?
()
Date: July 27, 2012 09:38AM
Did he side with Argentina over the Faulkland Islands?
Did he call France America's strongest ally?
Did he lecture Britain on a federal Europe and undercut British sovereignty?
Did he betray Britain to appease Moscow over the New START Treaty?
Did he throw a bust of Churchill out of the Oval Office?
Did he give their PM a cataloge of DVDs that can't be played in Britain?
No, that would be out current President that has insulted Britain every chance he has gotten.
Oh, and what is your source? A militant gay, leftist, progressive blogger? I am not surprised you spend your time there.....
Did he call France America's strongest ally?
Did he lecture Britain on a federal Europe and undercut British sovereignty?
Did he betray Britain to appease Moscow over the New START Treaty?
Did he throw a bust of Churchill out of the Oval Office?
Did he give their PM a cataloge of DVDs that can't be played in Britain?
No, that would be out current President that has insulted Britain every chance he has gotten.
Oh, and what is your source? A militant gay, leftist, progressive blogger? I am not surprised you spend your time there.....
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
madborlol
()
Date: July 27, 2012 09:47AM
and? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Did he side with Argentina over the Faulkland
> Islands?
> Did he call France America's strongest ally?
Fact, France the only country to help us in war.
> Did he lecture Britain on a federal Europe and
> undercut British sovereignty?
>
> Did he betray Britain to appease Moscow over the
> New START Treaty?
>
> Did he throw a bust of Churchill out of the Oval
> Office?
>
> Did he give their PM a cataloge of DVDs that can't
> be played in Britain?
>
> No, that would be out current President that has
> insulted Britain every chance he has gotten.
>
> Oh, and what is your source? A militant gay,
> leftist, progressive blogger? I am not surprised
> you spend your time there.....
LOL you mad bro that you nominated a boob and he will most likely blow the easiest election for a challenger in generation....lolz
-------------------------------------------------------
> Did he side with Argentina over the Faulkland
> Islands?
> Did he call France America's strongest ally?
Fact, France the only country to help us in war.
> Did he lecture Britain on a federal Europe and
> undercut British sovereignty?
>
> Did he betray Britain to appease Moscow over the
> New START Treaty?
>
> Did he throw a bust of Churchill out of the Oval
> Office?
>
> Did he give their PM a cataloge of DVDs that can't
> be played in Britain?
>
> No, that would be out current President that has
> insulted Britain every chance he has gotten.
>
> Oh, and what is your source? A militant gay,
> leftist, progressive blogger? I am not surprised
> you spend your time there.....
LOL you mad bro that you nominated a boob and he will most likely blow the easiest election for a challenger in generation....lolz
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
Lloydster
()
Date: July 27, 2012 09:49AM
Just be glad the Brits don't vote in our election. What an embarrassment Romney is.
I could be wrong but I'm right 99% of the time
I could be wrong but I'm right 99% of the time
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
and?
()
Date: July 27, 2012 09:50AM
madborlol Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> and? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Did he side with Argentina over the Faulkland
> > Islands?
>
>
>
> > Did he call France America's strongest ally?
> Fact, France the only country to help us in war.
>
> > Did he lecture Britain on a federal Europe and
> > undercut British sovereignty?
> >
> > Did he betray Britain to appease Moscow over
> the
> > New START Treaty?
> >
> > Did he throw a bust of Churchill out of the
> Oval
> > Office?
> >
> > Did he give their PM a cataloge of DVDs that
> can't
> > be played in Britain?
> >
> > No, that would be out current President that
> has
> > insulted Britain every chance he has gotten.
> >
> > Oh, and what is your source? A militant gay,
> > leftist, progressive blogger? I am not
> surprised
> > you spend your time there.....
>
> LOL you mad bro that you nominated a boob and he
> will most likely blow the easiest election for a
> challenger in generation....lolz
Mad that a Mormon that has no business even being in contention yet is poised to beat Obama? Why would I be mad?
-------------------------------------------------------
> and? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Did he side with Argentina over the Faulkland
> > Islands?
>
>
>
> > Did he call France America's strongest ally?
> Fact, France the only country to help us in war.
>
> > Did he lecture Britain on a federal Europe and
> > undercut British sovereignty?
> >
> > Did he betray Britain to appease Moscow over
> the
> > New START Treaty?
> >
> > Did he throw a bust of Churchill out of the
> Oval
> > Office?
> >
> > Did he give their PM a cataloge of DVDs that
> can't
> > be played in Britain?
> >
> > No, that would be out current President that
> has
> > insulted Britain every chance he has gotten.
> >
> > Oh, and what is your source? A militant gay,
> > leftist, progressive blogger? I am not
> surprised
> > you spend your time there.....
>
> LOL you mad bro that you nominated a boob and he
> will most likely blow the easiest election for a
> challenger in generation....lolz
Mad that a Mormon that has no business even being in contention yet is poised to beat Obama? Why would I be mad?
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
and?
()
Date: July 27, 2012 09:51AM
Lloydster Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Just be glad the Brits don't vote in our election.
> What an embarrassment Romney is.
If they could it would be Romney by more than a landslide. Talk to any Brit, they can't stand Obama. Get your news from a reliable source, not a gay blog.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Just be glad the Brits don't vote in our election.
> What an embarrassment Romney is.
If they could it would be Romney by more than a landslide. Talk to any Brit, they can't stand Obama. Get your news from a reliable source, not a gay blog.
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
Lloydster
()
Date: July 27, 2012 09:52AM
madborlol Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOL you mad bro that you nominated a boob and he
> will most likely blow the easiest election for a
> challenger in generation....lolz
+1
As vexxxxxxxxxxxxed will point out though, the boob hasn't been nominated yet.
I could be wrong but I'm right 99% of the time
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOL you mad bro that you nominated a boob and he
> will most likely blow the easiest election for a
> challenger in generation....lolz
+1
As vexxxxxxxxxxxxed will point out though, the boob hasn't been nominated yet.
I could be wrong but I'm right 99% of the time
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
Uh Oh!
()
Date: July 27, 2012 10:00AM
Rasmussen Tracking 7/24 - 7/26 1500 LV 3.0 44 49 Romney +5
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
FUNdamental
()
Date: July 27, 2012 10:03AM
Uh Oh! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rasmussen Tracking 7/24 - 7/26 1500
> LV 3.0 44 49 Romney +5
Rasmussen always has a 4% Republican slant. Why do you think Fox News uses them so much.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rasmussen Tracking 7/24 - 7/26 1500
> LV 3.0 44 49 Romney +5
Rasmussen always has a 4% Republican slant. Why do you think Fox News uses them so much.
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
back it up
()
Date: July 27, 2012 10:11AM
FUNdamental Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Uh Oh! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Rasmussen Tracking 7/24 - 7/26 1500
> > LV 3.0 44 49 Romney +5
>
>
> Rasmussen always has a 4% Republican slant. Why
> do you think Fox News uses them so much.
In 2004, Slate, yes, that Slate, conceded that Rasmussen was the most accurate. Are you calling Slate a liar? Politico called them the most accurate poll in 2008. Are you calling Politico a liar?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Uh Oh! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Rasmussen Tracking 7/24 - 7/26 1500
> > LV 3.0 44 49 Romney +5
>
>
> Rasmussen always has a 4% Republican slant. Why
> do you think Fox News uses them so much.
In 2004, Slate, yes, that Slate, conceded that Rasmussen was the most accurate. Are you calling Slate a liar? Politico called them the most accurate poll in 2008. Are you calling Politico a liar?
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
not consistant.
()
Date: July 27, 2012 10:18AM
Ras is accurate to a point but is all over the place. Weekend Republicans do better and during the Week Dems. In the past few weeks the rage is Romney +4 to Obama +3. But there is this...
In 2010, Nate Silver of the New York Times blog FiveThirtyEight wrote the article “Is Rasmussen Reports biased?”, in which he mostly defended Rasmussen from allegations of bias.[57] However, by later in the year, Rasmussen's polling results diverged notably from other mainstream pollsters, which Silver labeled a "house effect".[58] He went on to explore other factors which may have explained the effect such as the use of a likely voter model,[59] and claimed that Rasmussen conducted its polls in a way that excluded the majority of the population from answering.[60] Silver also criticized Rasmussen for often only polling races months before the election, which prevented them from having polls just before the election that could be assessed for accuracy. He wrote that he was “looking at appropriate ways to punish pollsters” like Rasmussen in his pollster rating models who don’t poll in the final days before an election.[61] In June 2012, Silver wrote that "Rasmussen Reports, which has had Republican-leaning results in the past, does so again this year. However, the tendency is not very strong – a Republican lean of about 1.3 points."[62]
After the 2010 midterm elections, Silver concluded that Rasmussen's polls were the least accurate of the major pollsters in 2010, having an average error of 5.8 points and a pro-Republican bias of 3.9 points according to Silver's model.[63] He singled out as an example the Hawaii Senate race, in which Rasmussen, in a poll completed three weeks before the election, showed incumbent Daniel Inouye only 13 points ahead, whereas in actuality he won by a 53% margin[64] – a difference of 40 points from Rasmussen's poll, or "the largest error ever recorded in a general election in FiveThirtyEight’s database, which includes all polls conducted since 1998".[63] Silver named Quinnipiac University Poll as the most accurate poll of the election cycle. However, according to RealClearPolitics, in toss-up races where both Rasmussen Reports and Quinnipiac polled, the Rasmussen Reports final poll was closer to the mark in every race.[65][66][67] The two firms projected the same candidate to win every race but the Florida gubernatorial race, where Rasmussen correctly projected Rick Scott's victory, while Quinnipiac showed Alex Sink with the lead
In 2010, Nate Silver of the New York Times blog FiveThirtyEight wrote the article “Is Rasmussen Reports biased?”, in which he mostly defended Rasmussen from allegations of bias.[57] However, by later in the year, Rasmussen's polling results diverged notably from other mainstream pollsters, which Silver labeled a "house effect".[58] He went on to explore other factors which may have explained the effect such as the use of a likely voter model,[59] and claimed that Rasmussen conducted its polls in a way that excluded the majority of the population from answering.[60] Silver also criticized Rasmussen for often only polling races months before the election, which prevented them from having polls just before the election that could be assessed for accuracy. He wrote that he was “looking at appropriate ways to punish pollsters” like Rasmussen in his pollster rating models who don’t poll in the final days before an election.[61] In June 2012, Silver wrote that "Rasmussen Reports, which has had Republican-leaning results in the past, does so again this year. However, the tendency is not very strong – a Republican lean of about 1.3 points."[62]
After the 2010 midterm elections, Silver concluded that Rasmussen's polls were the least accurate of the major pollsters in 2010, having an average error of 5.8 points and a pro-Republican bias of 3.9 points according to Silver's model.[63] He singled out as an example the Hawaii Senate race, in which Rasmussen, in a poll completed three weeks before the election, showed incumbent Daniel Inouye only 13 points ahead, whereas in actuality he won by a 53% margin[64] – a difference of 40 points from Rasmussen's poll, or "the largest error ever recorded in a general election in FiveThirtyEight’s database, which includes all polls conducted since 1998".[63] Silver named Quinnipiac University Poll as the most accurate poll of the election cycle. However, according to RealClearPolitics, in toss-up races where both Rasmussen Reports and Quinnipiac polled, the Rasmussen Reports final poll was closer to the mark in every race.[65][66][67] The two firms projected the same candidate to win every race but the Florida gubernatorial race, where Rasmussen correctly projected Rick Scott's victory, while Quinnipiac showed Alex Sink with the lead
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
trackingpolls are not that great.
()
Date: July 27, 2012 10:21AM
Uh Oh! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rasmussen Tracking 7/24 - 7/26 1500
> LV 3.0 44 49 Romney +5
Be careful with tracking polls. They are highly inaccurate. They bounce all over the place.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rasmussen Tracking 7/24 - 7/26 1500
> LV 3.0 44 49 Romney +5
Be careful with tracking polls. They are highly inaccurate. They bounce all over the place.
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
FUNdamental
()
Date: July 27, 2012 10:24AM
foxnews Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Foxnews said Romney slayed them and they showered
> him with flowers and love...nice try LIBTRADS!
If you watched Colbert, Stewart, Maddow, Matthews, or Klein this week, they all displayed clearly how Fox News edited a tape of what Obama said to make it appear he said something condemnable. Fox News then condemned him for it. If you watched, you would have seen side by side video, one edited one raw, where they deleted a line and where they cut it off. That action is not news, it is a "dirty trick."
-------------------------------------------------------
> Foxnews said Romney slayed them and they showered
> him with flowers and love...nice try LIBTRADS!
If you watched Colbert, Stewart, Maddow, Matthews, or Klein this week, they all displayed clearly how Fox News edited a tape of what Obama said to make it appear he said something condemnable. Fox News then condemned him for it. If you watched, you would have seen side by side video, one edited one raw, where they deleted a line and where they cut it off. That action is not news, it is a "dirty trick."
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
you didn't build shit
()
Date: July 27, 2012 10:35AM
FUNdamental Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> foxnews Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Foxnews said Romney slayed them and they
> showered
> > him with flowers and love...nice try LIBTRADS!
>
>
> If you watched Colbert, Stewart, Maddow,
> Matthews, or Klein this week, they all displayed
> clearly how Fox News edited a tape of what Obama
> said to make it appear he said something
> condemnable. Fox News then condemned him for it.
> If you watched, you would have seen side by side
> video, one edited one raw, where they deleted a
> line and where they cut it off. That action is
> not news, it is a "dirty trick."
What did President Obama say that mitigates the alleged statement against him?
-------------------------------------------------------
> foxnews Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Foxnews said Romney slayed them and they
> showered
> > him with flowers and love...nice try LIBTRADS!
>
>
> If you watched Colbert, Stewart, Maddow,
> Matthews, or Klein this week, they all displayed
> clearly how Fox News edited a tape of what Obama
> said to make it appear he said something
> condemnable. Fox News then condemned him for it.
> If you watched, you would have seen side by side
> video, one edited one raw, where they deleted a
> line and where they cut it off. That action is
> not news, it is a "dirty trick."
What did President Obama say that mitigates the alleged statement against him?
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
Horse Hockey
()
Date: July 27, 2012 11:04AM
Nobody gives a shit about Romneys horse or what Romney thinks about the Olympics of about his wife never working or any other side-show of the minute you desperate pathetic dem's keep trying to make a big deal.
It's the economy stupid.
Obama sucks, the biggest fucking loser president of all time.
It's the economy stupid.
Obama sucks, the biggest fucking loser president of all time.
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
BigK
()
Date: July 27, 2012 11:13AM
> Obama sucks, the biggest fucking loser president
> of all time.
NO..........That would be the previous President, Bush, that left the economy a mess.
> of all time.
NO..........That would be the previous President, Bush, that left the economy a mess.
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
curious
()
Date: July 27, 2012 11:34AM
I should have voted for the horse in the Republican primary- seems very acomplished, and has a way with words.
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
Vexxxed
()
Date: July 27, 2012 12:29PM
BigK Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > Obama sucks, the biggest fucking loser
> president
> > of all time.
>
>
> NO..........That would be the previous President,
> Bush, that left the economy a mess.
News Flash!
This just in..........George W. Bush still is not running for the office of president.
In other news today, it was published by an idiot troll on the internet that current president should be re-elected simply because he hit the "pause" button on fixing any problems with the country and then fast fowarding through zillions of dollars to maintain that it's still Bush's fault.
Film at 11
PS..glad you sold your home....that presumably is situated in the formerly recession proof DC area....cause despite your bullshit to the contrary, the rest of the country is still in the toilet.
http://www.bizjournals.com/charlotte/blog/morning-edition/2012/07/us-homes-sales-drop-unexpectedly.html
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > Obama sucks, the biggest fucking loser
> president
> > of all time.
>
>
> NO..........That would be the previous President,
> Bush, that left the economy a mess.
News Flash!
This just in..........George W. Bush still is not running for the office of president.
In other news today, it was published by an idiot troll on the internet that current president should be re-elected simply because he hit the "pause" button on fixing any problems with the country and then fast fowarding through zillions of dollars to maintain that it's still Bush's fault.
Film at 11
PS..glad you sold your home....that presumably is situated in the formerly recession proof DC area....cause despite your bullshit to the contrary, the rest of the country is still in the toilet.
http://www.bizjournals.com/charlotte/blog/morning-edition/2012/07/us-homes-sales-drop-unexpectedly.html
Attachments:
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
Funny Stuff
()
Date: July 27, 2012 12:55PM
Did you see the shit the UK gossip rags are saying about Romney. They are having a field day with him. Once the Brits getting on topic they'll keeping it going. Funny stuff.
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
Uk Headlines
()
Date: July 27, 2012 01:06PM
Everybody in London is enjoying Romney...
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
BURRRRRNNNRNRNRNRNRN
()
Date: July 27, 2012 02:44PM
and? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Did he throw a bust of Churchill out of the Oval
> Office?
Really, then explain this....White House file photo of Pres Obama and PM Cameron viewing bust of Churchill in WH Residence, July 20 2010
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Did he throw a bust of Churchill out of the Oval
> Office?
Really, then explain this....White House file photo of Pres Obama and PM Cameron viewing bust of Churchill in WH Residence, July 20 2010
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
and?
()
Date: July 27, 2012 02:51PM
BURRRRRNNNRNRNRNRNRN Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> and? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> > Did he throw a bust of Churchill out of the
> Oval
> > Office?
>
>
> Really, then explain this....White House file
> photo of Pres Obama and PM Cameron viewing bust of
> Churchill in WH Residence, July 20 2010
>
I can easily explain that. That is not a picture of the Oval Office. That is outside the Treaty Room which would place the bust in the Residence, not the oval office.
I bet you thought you had that one won. Sucks to be you. You don't share a brain with Lloydster, do you?
Would you like to challenge any of my other factual claims? I have no qualms about taking you to the woodshed again.
-------------------------------------------------------
> and? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> > Did he throw a bust of Churchill out of the
> Oval
> > Office?
>
>
> Really, then explain this....White House file
> photo of Pres Obama and PM Cameron viewing bust of
> Churchill in WH Residence, July 20 2010
>
I can easily explain that. That is not a picture of the Oval Office. That is outside the Treaty Room which would place the bust in the Residence, not the oval office.
I bet you thought you had that one won. Sucks to be you. You don't share a brain with Lloydster, do you?
Would you like to challenge any of my other factual claims? I have no qualms about taking you to the woodshed again.
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
FUNdamental
()
Date: July 27, 2012 03:19PM
The bust was loaned to President Bush because George wanted inspiration because he was at that point "George was a wartime president." It was replace in the oval office by a bust of Lincoln. If Romney is elected he said he would bring the bust back to the Oval Office. Will he replace the bust of Lincoln?
Why does Romney hate the man that freed the slaves?
Why does Romney hate the man that freed the slaves?
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
FUNdamental
()
Date: July 27, 2012 03:26PM
Vexxxed Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> BigK Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > Obama sucks, the biggest fucking loser
> > president
> > > of all time.
> >
> >
> > NO..........That would be the previous
> President,
> > Bush, that left the economy a mess.
>
>
> News Flash!
>
> This just in..........George W. Bush still is not
> running for the office of president.
>
You are right, just his trusted policy advisors are in the game running Romney for President.
Pay no attention to the men behind the curtain.
-------------------------------------------------------
> BigK Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > Obama sucks, the biggest fucking loser
> > president
> > > of all time.
> >
> >
> > NO..........That would be the previous
> President,
> > Bush, that left the economy a mess.
>
>
> News Flash!
>
> This just in..........George W. Bush still is not
> running for the office of president.
>
You are right, just his trusted policy advisors are in the game running Romney for President.
Pay no attention to the men behind the curtain.
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
and?
()
Date: July 27, 2012 03:32PM
FUNdamental Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The bust was loaned to President Bush because
> George wanted inspiration because he was at that
> point "George was a wartime president." It was
> replace in the oval office by a bust of Lincoln.
> If Romney is elected he said he would bring the
> bust back to the Oval Office. Will he replace the
> bust of Lincoln?
>
> Why does Romney hate the man that freed the
> slaves?
First, President Bush accepted the bust on July 16, 2001 which as you remember was months before any military engagement.
Fifteen minute video of event here: http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/165199-1
Second, having been in the oval office numerous times, I can attest to the fact that the room is more than big enough to accomodate both busts (over 800 sq. feet). You are presuming facts out of evidence. At no point has Mr. Romney indicated that he would remove the bust of Lincoln.
-------------------------------------------------------
> The bust was loaned to President Bush because
> George wanted inspiration because he was at that
> point "George was a wartime president." It was
> replace in the oval office by a bust of Lincoln.
> If Romney is elected he said he would bring the
> bust back to the Oval Office. Will he replace the
> bust of Lincoln?
>
> Why does Romney hate the man that freed the
> slaves?
First, President Bush accepted the bust on July 16, 2001 which as you remember was months before any military engagement.
Fifteen minute video of event here: http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/165199-1
Second, having been in the oval office numerous times, I can attest to the fact that the room is more than big enough to accomodate both busts (over 800 sq. feet). You are presuming facts out of evidence. At no point has Mr. Romney indicated that he would remove the bust of Lincoln.
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
Oz
()
Date: July 27, 2012 03:37PM
FUNdamental Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Vexxxed Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > BigK Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > > Obama sucks, the biggest fucking loser
> > > president
> > > > of all time.
> > >
> > >
> > > NO..........That would be the previous
> > President,
> > > Bush, that left the economy a mess.
> >
> >
> > News Flash!
> >
> > This just in..........George W. Bush still is
> not
> > running for the office of president.
> >
>
> You are right, just his trusted policy advisors
> are in the game running Romney for President.
>
>
> Pay no attention to the men behind the curtain.
We know Americans don't pay attention to the men behind the curtain - Wright, Ayers, Frank Marshall Davis, Saul Mendelson, etc.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Vexxxed Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > BigK Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > > Obama sucks, the biggest fucking loser
> > > president
> > > > of all time.
> > >
> > >
> > > NO..........That would be the previous
> > President,
> > > Bush, that left the economy a mess.
> >
> >
> > News Flash!
> >
> > This just in..........George W. Bush still is
> not
> > running for the office of president.
> >
>
> You are right, just his trusted policy advisors
> are in the game running Romney for President.
>
>
> Pay no attention to the men behind the curtain.
We know Americans don't pay attention to the men behind the curtain - Wright, Ayers, Frank Marshall Davis, Saul Mendelson, etc.
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
Uh Oh!
()
Date: July 27, 2012 04:18PM
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
Clowning with Romney
()
Date: July 27, 2012 04:44PM
Clowning with Romney
Where Romney's next stop. Should be a good gaffe there too.
Heads up Poland and Israel... Romney is headed your way.
Where Romney's next stop. Should be a good gaffe there too.
Heads up Poland and Israel... Romney is headed your way.
Re: UK morning papers blast Romney visit....
Posted by:
Fuck Lloyds mom
()
Date: July 27, 2012 05:01PM
Say what you will fucknut. He is right about London's Olympic security.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=342544945856322429
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/piers-morgan-defends-mitt-romneys-olympics-comments-he-was-just-speaking-the-truth/
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=342544945856322429
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/piers-morgan-defends-mitt-romneys-olympics-comments-he-was-just-speaking-the-truth/