Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Clarence Beeks
()
Date: October 22, 2011 05:00PM
Make sure you have a complicated password that includes a combination of letters, numbers and special characters. Rumor has it that chuckhoffmann is developing a script to perform dictionary attacks and is also considering use of rainbow tables.
You do not want chuckhoffmann to discover your password to your Fairfax Underground account as he is close to cracking passwords on the accounts of eesh, MrMephisto, Harry Tuttle, and Alias.
You do not want chuckhoffmann to discover your password to your Fairfax Underground account as he is close to cracking passwords on the accounts of eesh, MrMephisto, Harry Tuttle, and Alias.
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
andfuckchuckisalame-o
()
Date: October 22, 2011 05:59PM
And what's fuckchuck gonna do once he has the passwords? All these accounts are linked to throwaway fake e-mail addys anyway.
If he is doing this though, Cary needs to drop the banhammer on fuckchuck's lame ass right fucking now.
If he is doing this though, Cary needs to drop the banhammer on fuckchuck's lame ass right fucking now.
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
WashingTone-Locian
()
Date: October 22, 2011 06:36PM
andfuckchuckisalame-o Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And what's fuckchuck gonna do once he has the
> passwords? All these accounts are linked to
> throwaway fake e-mail addys anyway.
>
> If he is doing this though, Cary needs to drop the
> banhammer on fuckchuck's lame ass right fucking
> now.
My God! My e-mail is actually my social security number and mom's maiden name. Was it wrong to use those?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm
-------------------------------------------------------
> And what's fuckchuck gonna do once he has the
> passwords? All these accounts are linked to
> throwaway fake e-mail addys anyway.
>
> If he is doing this though, Cary needs to drop the
> banhammer on fuckchuck's lame ass right fucking
> now.
My God! My e-mail is actually my social security number and mom's maiden name. Was it wrong to use those?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Harry Tuttle
()
Date: October 22, 2011 07:18PM
If chuck's hacking is anything like his net sleuthing and HTML use, I don't think anyone's got anything to worry about...
Signatures are for fags
Signatures are for fags
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: October 22, 2011 07:20PM
Harry Tuttle's password used to be "Rimj0b4me"
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Harry Tuttle
()
Date: October 22, 2011 07:24PM
I just changed my password... since chuck was so close, and all...
It's now a two word phrase, all lowercase letters...
---------
Wanna play hangman?
Signatures are for fags
It's now a two word phrase, all lowercase letters...
---------
Wanna play hangman?
Signatures are for fags
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: October 22, 2011 07:27PM
Harry Tuttle Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's now a two word phrase, all lowercase
> letters...
blow me
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's now a two word phrase, all lowercase
> letters...
blow me
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: October 22, 2011 07:29PM
Hate to digress Tuttle, but did you see the blog?
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Harry Tuttle
()
Date: October 22, 2011 07:33PM
None of those letters are in it... I think you just hanged the man...
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> blow me
Signatures are for fags
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> blow me
Signatures are for fags
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Harry Tuttle
()
Date: October 22, 2011 07:33PM
I did...
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hate to digress Tuttle, but did you see the blog?
Signatures are for fags
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hate to digress Tuttle, but did you see the blog?
Signatures are for fags
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Conie
()
Date: October 22, 2011 07:33PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Harry Tuttle's password used to be "Rimj0b4me"
Wow...cool
What's my password eesh?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Harry Tuttle's password used to be "Rimj0b4me"
Wow...cool
What's my password eesh?
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: October 22, 2011 07:34PM
Harry Tuttle Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I did...
Thoughts?
-------------------------------------------------------
> I did...
Thoughts?
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
friskydingo
()
Date: October 22, 2011 07:37PM
Blog? What blog?
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: October 22, 2011 07:39PM
friskydingo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Blog? What blog?
[redacted]
edit by Cary: Link to personal attack blog redacted. Personal attacks against other forum members are prohibited.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/25/2011 06:08PM by Cary.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Blog? What blog?
[redacted]
edit by Cary: Link to personal attack blog redacted. Personal attacks against other forum members are prohibited.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/25/2011 06:08PM by Cary.
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Conie
()
Date: October 22, 2011 07:39PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Harry Tuttle Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I did...
>
>
>
>
>
> Thoughts?
"like bacon"
-------------------------------------------------------
> Harry Tuttle Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I did...
>
>
>
>
>
> Thoughts?
"like bacon"
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
friskydingo
()
Date: October 22, 2011 07:47PM
Dam, I so wish I was around in the inkahootz days. That man looks like primo quality entertainment
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Harry Tuttle
()
Date: October 22, 2011 07:49PM
Interesting concept...
Edit: I feel like some details may be lacking... will there be updates?
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thoughts?
Signatures are for fags
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/22/2011 07:50PM by Harry Tuttle.
Edit: I feel like some details may be lacking... will there be updates?
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thoughts?
Signatures are for fags
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/22/2011 07:50PM by Harry Tuttle.
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Harry Tuttle
()
Date: October 22, 2011 07:51PM
Sorry everyone... You must be less stupid than Conie to play..
Conie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "like bacon"
Signatures are for fags
Conie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "like bacon"
Signatures are for fags
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: October 22, 2011 07:52PM
Harry Tuttle Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Interesting concept...
>
> Edit: I feel like some details may be lacking...
> will there be updates?
There is much more to come. Still have to upload more pics for starters.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Interesting concept...
>
> Edit: I feel like some details may be lacking...
> will there be updates?
There is much more to come. Still have to upload more pics for starters.
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Conie
()
Date: October 22, 2011 07:53PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Harry Tuttle Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Interesting concept...
> >
> > Edit: I feel like some details may be
> lacking...
> > will there be updates?
>
>
>
>
> There is much more to come. Still have to upload
> more pics for starters.
++1
-------------------------------------------------------
> Harry Tuttle Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Interesting concept...
> >
> > Edit: I feel like some details may be
> lacking...
> > will there be updates?
>
>
>
>
> There is much more to come. Still have to upload
> more pics for starters.
++1
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: October 22, 2011 07:55PM
Reading about Yaoi on wikipedia. Interesting stuff....
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Clarence Beeks
()
Date: October 22, 2011 08:43PM
It would be funny as hell if he murders you.
Maybe that's your goal?
Death by Inkahootz?
Maybe that's your goal?
Death by Inkahootz?
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Mrs O'Finnegan
()
Date: October 22, 2011 08:57PM
No jury would convict him!
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Judge Judy
()
Date: October 22, 2011 09:08PM
Wouldn't Chuck's activities be a violation of Federal law under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986?
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: October 22, 2011 11:12PM
Clarence Beeks Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It would be funny as hell if he murders you.
>
> Maybe that's your goal?
>
> Death by Inkahootz?
I don't have much to worry about, as inkahootz still doesn't know my true identity, and plus, most of his threats of violence has historically been aimed at females in real life. (He's a real big man.)
-------------------------------------------------------
> It would be funny as hell if he murders you.
>
> Maybe that's your goal?
>
> Death by Inkahootz?
I don't have much to worry about, as inkahootz still doesn't know my true identity, and plus, most of his threats of violence has historically been aimed at females in real life. (He's a real big man.)
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
SlowBro
()
Date: October 22, 2011 11:35PM
Wait, so people can steal your passwords here?
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Conie
()
Date: October 22, 2011 11:44PM
SlowBro Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wait, so people can steal your passwords here?
seriously bro?
Yeah....;)
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wait, so people can steal your passwords here?
seriously bro?
Yeah....;)
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
BruteForceFailure
()
Date: October 23, 2011 04:08AM
Judge Judy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wouldn't Chuck's activities be a violation of
> Federal law under the Electronic Communications
> Privacy Act of 1986?
Possibly, if Chuck were foolish enough to actually write a script to attempt to brute-force someone else's password.
However, such an attempt would be comically doomed to failure, as he would have to slow down the speed of his attacks to something that would not trip the rate-limiting measures Cary's implemented on this board. This would probably limit the number of guesses to one every 1 to 5 seconds.
Given that it would probably take something upwards of 250,000 guesses to successfully crack someone's password (and probably more for computer-savvy users like Harry Tuttle and eesh), you'd be looking at a script that would have to run for a week or more, nonstop, just to get a single password.
And asI user andfuckchuckisalame-o pointed out above, what would he do with the account once he had control of it?
Chuck would be better advised to write more lame articles on his lame wiki that no one reads.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wouldn't Chuck's activities be a violation of
> Federal law under the Electronic Communications
> Privacy Act of 1986?
Possibly, if Chuck were foolish enough to actually write a script to attempt to brute-force someone else's password.
However, such an attempt would be comically doomed to failure, as he would have to slow down the speed of his attacks to something that would not trip the rate-limiting measures Cary's implemented on this board. This would probably limit the number of guesses to one every 1 to 5 seconds.
Given that it would probably take something upwards of 250,000 guesses to successfully crack someone's password (and probably more for computer-savvy users like Harry Tuttle and eesh), you'd be looking at a script that would have to run for a week or more, nonstop, just to get a single password.
And as
Chuck would be better advised to write more lame articles on his lame wiki that no one reads.
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Hank Moody
()
Date: October 23, 2011 09:53AM
BruteForceFailure Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Judge Judy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Wouldn't Chuck's activities be a violation of
> > Federal law under the Electronic Communications
> > Privacy Act of 1986?
>
> Possibly, if Chuck were foolish enough to actually
> write a script to attempt to brute-force someone
> else's password.
>
> However, such an attempt would be comically doomed
> to failure, as he would have to slow down the
> speed of his attacks to something that would not
> trip the rate-limiting measures Cary's implemented
> on this board. This would probably limit the
> number of guesses to one every 1 to 5 seconds.
>
> Given that it would probably take something
> upwards of 250,000 guesses to successfully crack
> someone's password (and probably more for
> computer-savvy users like Harry Tuttle and eesh),
> you'd be looking at a script that would have to
> run for a week or more, nonstop, just to get a
> single password.
>
> And as I user andfuckchuckisalame-o pointed out
> above, what would he do with the account once he
> had control of it?
>
> Chuck would be better advised to write more lame
> articles on his lame wiki that no one reads.
cr3at1v3 pa55w0rd$ f0r th3 w!n.
The OP is a troll. I'm pretty sure such a brute force attack would be flagged as a denial of service attack and the IP address would be immediately black listed. At least they are on my system.
Rainbow tables? Does anyone here really think the passwords here are hashed? If you have access to the stored hashes, why fuck around with cracking forums passwords?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Judge Judy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Wouldn't Chuck's activities be a violation of
> > Federal law under the Electronic Communications
> > Privacy Act of 1986?
>
> Possibly, if Chuck were foolish enough to actually
> write a script to attempt to brute-force someone
> else's password.
>
> However, such an attempt would be comically doomed
> to failure, as he would have to slow down the
> speed of his attacks to something that would not
> trip the rate-limiting measures Cary's implemented
> on this board. This would probably limit the
> number of guesses to one every 1 to 5 seconds.
>
> Given that it would probably take something
> upwards of 250,000 guesses to successfully crack
> someone's password (and probably more for
> computer-savvy users like Harry Tuttle and eesh),
> you'd be looking at a script that would have to
> run for a week or more, nonstop, just to get a
> single password.
>
> And as I user andfuckchuckisalame-o pointed out
> above, what would he do with the account once he
> had control of it?
>
> Chuck would be better advised to write more lame
> articles on his lame wiki that no one reads.
cr3at1v3 pa55w0rd$ f0r th3 w!n.
The OP is a troll. I'm pretty sure such a brute force attack would be flagged as a denial of service attack and the IP address would be immediately black listed. At least they are on my system.
Rainbow tables? Does anyone here really think the passwords here are hashed? If you have access to the stored hashes, why fuck around with cracking forums passwords?
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Murderer
()
Date: October 23, 2011 03:14PM
It's too bad this forum isn't setup for anonymous posts...
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
TUTTLE IS WRONG
()
Date: October 23, 2011 03:48PM
Harry Tuttle Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If chuck's hacking is anything like his net
> sleuthing and HTML use, I don't think anyone's got
> anything to worry about...
CHUCKHOFFMAN STANDS AT THE FOREFRONT OF TECHNOLOGY
-------------------------------------------------------
> If chuck's hacking is anything like his net
> sleuthing and HTML use, I don't think anyone's got
> anything to worry about...
CHUCKHOFFMAN STANDS AT THE FOREFRONT OF TECHNOLOGY
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
what's new?
()
Date: October 23, 2011 03:50PM
"TUTTLE IS WRONG"
I've known that for years
I've known that for years
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
HE IS WRONG
()
Date: October 23, 2011 04:16PM
what's new? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "TUTTLE IS WRONG"
>
> I've known that for years
HARRY TUTTLE'S DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE SUPERIOR TECHNICAL ACHIEVEMENT OF CHUCKHOFFMAN
-------------------------------------------------------
> "TUTTLE IS WRONG"
>
> I've known that for years
HARRY TUTTLE'S DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE SUPERIOR TECHNICAL ACHIEVEMENT OF CHUCKHOFFMAN
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
TutzPotaToes Chip
()
Date: October 23, 2011 04:25PM
HE IS WRONG Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> what's new? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > "TUTTLE IS WRONG"
> >
> > I've known that for years
>
>
> HARRY TUTTLE'S DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE SUPERIOR
> TECHNICAL ACHIEVEMENT OF CHUCKHOFFMAN
All caps anonymous eesh post
-------------------------------------------------------
> what's new? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > "TUTTLE IS WRONG"
> >
> > I've known that for years
>
>
> HARRY TUTTLE'S DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE SUPERIOR
> TECHNICAL ACHIEVEMENT OF CHUCKHOFFMAN
All caps anonymous eesh post
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
funny
()
Date: October 23, 2011 06:26PM
well this can't be true..if it was why would chuck WARN us? just making us make our PWs harder. that's the same logic as calling in a bomb threat.
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Harry Tuttle
()
Date: October 23, 2011 08:23PM
I do...
Hank Moody Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Does anyone here really think the
> passwords here are hashed?
Signatures are for fags
Hank Moody Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Does anyone here really think the
> passwords here are hashed?
Signatures are for fags
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Hank Moody
()
Date: October 23, 2011 09:42PM
Harry Tuttle Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I do...
>
> Hank Moody Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Does anyone here really think the
> > passwords here are hashed?
Okay, I guess there isn't any reason why they shouldn't be... do you think Chuck will ever get sufficient access to query the database to get a list of user IDs and hashed passwords?
-------------------------------------------------------
> I do...
>
> Hank Moody Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Does anyone here really think the
> > passwords here are hashed?
Okay, I guess there isn't any reason why they shouldn't be... do you think Chuck will ever get sufficient access to query the database to get a list of user IDs and hashed passwords?
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Harry Tuttle
()
Date: October 23, 2011 09:46PM
No... and I don't think chuck is even trying.. I do not believe that this thread was started by the anonymous chuckhoffmann...
Hank Moody Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Okay, I guess there isn't any reason why they
> shouldn't be... do you think Chuck will ever get
> sufficient access to query the database to get a
> list of user IDs and hashed passwords?
Signatures are for fags
Hank Moody Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Okay, I guess there isn't any reason why they
> shouldn't be... do you think Chuck will ever get
> sufficient access to query the database to get a
> list of user IDs and hashed passwords?
Signatures are for fags
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: October 23, 2011 10:35PM
Gravis talks about Phorum password security here: http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/251752/251752.html#msg-251752
Blessed are the murderous.
Blessed are the murderous.
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Harry Tuttle is a Winnar!
()
Date: October 23, 2011 11:00PM
Harry Tuttle Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No... and I don't think chuck is even trying.. I
> do not believe that this thread was started by the
> anonymous chuckhoffmann...
>
> Hank Moody Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Okay, I guess there isn't any reason why they
> > shouldn't be... do you think Chuck will ever
> get
> > sufficient access to query the database to get
> a
> > list of user IDs and hashed passwords?
Harry gets the win! We would offer him some lovely prizes, but we are broke.
And while chuckhoffman did not start this thread, he did post in it, twice. (Well, three times, now.)
Did you spot the anonymous chuckhoffman posts?
Oh, and to Hank Moody- there is not enough hop in Northern Virginia to get Cary stoned enough to give me access to the MySQL database underlying this forum, so don't worry about it.
-------------------------------------------------------
> No... and I don't think chuck is even trying.. I
> do not believe that this thread was started by the
> anonymous chuckhoffmann...
>
> Hank Moody Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Okay, I guess there isn't any reason why they
> > shouldn't be... do you think Chuck will ever
> get
> > sufficient access to query the database to get
> a
> > list of user IDs and hashed passwords?
Harry gets the win! We would offer him some lovely prizes, but we are broke.
And while chuckhoffman did not start this thread, he did post in it, twice. (Well, three times, now.)
Did you spot the anonymous chuckhoffman posts?
Oh, and to Hank Moody- there is not enough hop in Northern Virginia to get Cary stoned enough to give me access to the MySQL database underlying this forum, so don't worry about it.
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Harry Tuttle
()
Date: October 23, 2011 11:27PM
Harry Tuttle is a Winnar! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Did you spot the anonymous chuckhoffman posts?
Quite easily...
Signatures are for fags
-------------------------------------------------------
> Did you spot the anonymous chuckhoffman posts?
Quite easily...
Signatures are for fags
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Cary
()
Date: October 24, 2011 06:22PM
I got a couple reports on this thread so I just wanted to chime in and say that everyone's password is safe.
I use a combination of PortSentry, Apache's mod_evasive and custom iptables rules to ensure that one user cannot perform a DoS on the system or brute force passwords. Chuck's "AutoIt" scripts are usually not a problem as they only make a request every 5 seconds or so (just below the threshold) but he has tripped over the iptables "max connections per ip per minute" and mod_evasive "max attempts for the same page" triggers before.
Be sure to use a non-dictionary password of at least 7 characters and you'll be fine.
And yes, if I ever do see someone specifically targeting user accounts they are iptables banned (can't even access the server) immediately.
- Cary (the admin)
I use a combination of PortSentry, Apache's mod_evasive and custom iptables rules to ensure that one user cannot perform a DoS on the system or brute force passwords. Chuck's "AutoIt" scripts are usually not a problem as they only make a request every 5 seconds or so (just below the threshold) but he has tripped over the iptables "max connections per ip per minute" and mod_evasive "max attempts for the same page" triggers before.
Be sure to use a non-dictionary password of at least 7 characters and you'll be fine.
And yes, if I ever do see someone specifically targeting user accounts they are iptables banned (can't even access the server) immediately.
- Cary (the admin)
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
friskydingo
()
Date: October 24, 2011 10:34PM
Say my password was 12345 and chuckhoffmann hijacks my account will cary step in and give it back to me?
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Harry Tuttle
()
Date: October 24, 2011 10:36PM
Depends on the situation... It doesn't appear that's how it worked out for inkahootz...
friskydingo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Say my password was 12345 and chuckhoffmann
> hijacks my account will cary step in and give it
> back to me?
Signatures are for fags
friskydingo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Say my password was 12345 and chuckhoffmann
> hijacks my account will cary step in and give it
> back to me?
Signatures are for fags
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
poopstick
()
Date: October 24, 2011 10:38PM
12345... That's the same password I have on my luggage!
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Mr. Misery
()
Date: October 24, 2011 10:57PM
are you shitting in my dickhole?! Is this really happening? That son of a bitch really is trying to steal passwords? Why hasn't Cary assigned Gravis to make him a "gone guy" yet? Gravis is "a guy", right? Can't he "take care" of Chuck?
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
poopstick
()
Date: October 24, 2011 11:00PM
I don't know if it was your intention, but do not google image search "gone guy" with the filter off.
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: October 24, 2011 11:06PM
Harry Tuttle Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Depends on the situation... It doesn't appear
> that's how it worked out for inkahootz...
>
> friskydingo Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Say my password was 12345 and chuckhoffmann
> > hijacks my account will cary step in and give
> it
> > back to me?
LOL okay....some people give out their password because:
a. They are a tool.
b. They are shit-faced drunk.
c. Combo of both.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Depends on the situation... It doesn't appear
> that's how it worked out for inkahootz...
>
> friskydingo Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Say my password was 12345 and chuckhoffmann
> > hijacks my account will cary step in and give
> it
> > back to me?
LOL okay....some people give out their password because:
a. They are a tool.
b. They are shit-faced drunk.
c. Combo of both.
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
friskydingo
()
Date: October 24, 2011 11:13PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Harry Tuttle Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Depends on the situation... It doesn't appear
> > that's how it worked out for inkahootz...
> >
> > friskydingo Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Say my password was 12345 and chuckhoffmann
> > > hijacks my account will cary step in and give
> > it
> > > back to me?
>
>
>
> LOL okay....some people give out their password
> because:
>
>
>
a. They are a tool. (CHECK)
b. They are shit-faced drunk. (CHECK)
c. Combo of both. (DOUBLE CHECK)
-------------------------------------------------------
> Harry Tuttle Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Depends on the situation... It doesn't appear
> > that's how it worked out for inkahootz...
> >
> > friskydingo Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Say my password was 12345 and chuckhoffmann
> > > hijacks my account will cary step in and give
> > it
> > > back to me?
>
>
>
> LOL okay....some people give out their password
> because:
>
>
>
a. They are a tool. (CHECK)
b. They are shit-faced drunk. (CHECK)
c. Combo of both. (DOUBLE CHECK)
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Mr. Misery
()
Date: October 24, 2011 11:14PM
eesh, where do you live
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: October 24, 2011 11:16PM
Mr. Misery Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh, where do you live
The Lamb Center.
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh, where do you live
The Lamb Center.
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
friskydingo
()
Date: October 24, 2011 11:17PM
poopstick Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don't know if it was your intention, but do not
> google image search "gone guy" with the filter
> off.
Bwhaha
I had to do it. I just had to. Now I wish I hadn't.
Curiosity killed the dingo as they say
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don't know if it was your intention, but do not
> google image search "gone guy" with the filter
> off.
Bwhaha
I had to do it. I just had to. Now I wish I hadn't.
Curiosity killed the dingo as they say
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Mr. Misery
()
Date: October 24, 2011 11:17PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mr. Misery Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > eesh, where do you live
>
>
>
>
> The Lamb Center.
why wouldn't you be a friend with me? I don't understand why. I like you.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mr. Misery Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > eesh, where do you live
>
>
>
>
> The Lamb Center.
why wouldn't you be a friend with me? I don't understand why. I like you.
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
poopstick
()
Date: October 24, 2011 11:19PM
friskydingo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> poopstick Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I don't know if it was your intention, but do
> not
> > google image search "gone guy" with the filter
> > off.
>
>
> Bwhaha
>
> I had to do it. I just had to. Now I wish I
> hadn't.
>
> Curiosity killed the dingo as they say
Right?!? I don't get it... guess it's some sort of slang I'm not hip to.
-------------------------------------------------------
> poopstick Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I don't know if it was your intention, but do
> not
> > google image search "gone guy" with the filter
> > off.
>
>
> Bwhaha
>
> I had to do it. I just had to. Now I wish I
> hadn't.
>
> Curiosity killed the dingo as they say
Right?!? I don't get it... guess it's some sort of slang I'm not hip to.
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Mr. Misery
()
Date: October 24, 2011 11:20PM
did I say a gay thing without knowing it? Is "gone guy" a gay sexy act I don't know about?
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
it figures
()
Date: October 24, 2011 11:22PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mr. Misery Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > eesh, where do you live
>
>
>
>
> The Lamb Center.
Now we know where all that TLC bullshit comes from.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mr. Misery Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > eesh, where do you live
>
>
>
>
> The Lamb Center.
Now we know where all that TLC bullshit comes from.
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Harry Tuttle
()
Date: October 24, 2011 11:39PM
No... I doubt it... Google image search (with safesearch turned off) will return gay sex pics for almost any combination of words...
Mr. Misery Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> did I say a gay thing without knowing it? Is "gone
> guy" a gay sexy act I don't know about?
Signatures are for fags
Mr. Misery Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> did I say a gay thing without knowing it? Is "gone
> guy" a gay sexy act I don't know about?
Signatures are for fags
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Spawn of Eli
()
Date: December 02, 2011 12:01AM
Cary Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And yes, if I ever do see someone specifically
> targeting user accounts they are iptables banned
> (can't even access the server) immediately.
>
> - Cary (the admin)
I noticed this after my successful DDOS a few months back which was preventing me from even viewing the site from one of my neighbors networks(the one which the DDOS was initiated). BTW you need change some of the parameters/modules in the kernel because it was somewhat easy to bypass. I was tempted to allow only my ip and block everyone else's ips from accessing the site but I thought better about it.
PS You might also want to take a look at (if you haven't already) the apparmor prog
apprmor do it
-------------------------------------------------------
> And yes, if I ever do see someone specifically
> targeting user accounts they are iptables banned
> (can't even access the server) immediately.
>
> - Cary (the admin)
I noticed this after my successful DDOS a few months back which was preventing me from even viewing the site from one of my neighbors networks(the one which the DDOS was initiated). BTW you need change some of the parameters/modules in the kernel because it was somewhat easy to bypass. I was tempted to allow only my ip and block everyone else's ips from accessing the site but I thought better about it.
PS You might also want to take a look at (if you haven't already) the apparmor prog
apprmor do it
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: December 02, 2011 12:09AM
Spawn of Eli must be taking Computer Science III. http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/Computer_Science_III
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Spawn of Eli
()
Date: December 02, 2011 12:20AM
i previously worked doing network security for a company called shavlik. we were bought out a few months back and given a nice severance package. I got almost 10 months worth of my salary just for accepting!!
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: December 02, 2011 12:25AM
Cool story bro, but it sounds like bullshit, kinda like your skills as a h4xx0r. LMAO
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Spawn of Eli
()
Date: December 02, 2011 12:27AM
but the past few months i have been working on and developing the site: http://listnr.com/ . it is still in the works but it is going to be HUGE!
Re: chuckhoffmann reminds you about weak passwords
Posted by:
Bryan
()
Date: December 05, 2011 10:31PM
Hey all,
I'm one of the guys who are *actually* building http://listnr.com/ mentioned above, and I just wanted to say that we have no idea who this Spawn of Eli guy is. We're super honored that he believes in us so much, though!
I'm one of the guys who are *actually* building http://listnr.com/ mentioned above, and I just wanted to say that we have no idea who this Spawn of Eli guy is. We're super honored that he believes in us so much, though!