thetruthreincarnated Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> look i realize that no matter what i say people
> are going to find a way to shred my beliefs as
> garbage. But its pretty weird how when the 9/11
> conspiracy is talked about in the media they
> always leave out the compelling points and
> demonize the truth movement saying we do drugs,
> are mentally ill and spend too much time on the
> internet etc. They don't wanna connect the dots
> such as why it would make sense for it to be
> staged ($$$). The put options that showed prior
> knowledge on wall street of the attacks, the
> military exercises that shows we were ready to
> take out rogue planes, The people you can see on
> youtube clips just outside the towers talking
> about the BOMBS THAT WENT OFF BEFORE THE FIRST
> PLANE HIT, news reports that knew building 7 was
> coming down before it even happened and the
> fucking count down of its controlled demolition,
> the fbi agents that resigned because the bush
> administration told them to stop investigating
> osama bin laden, The fact that our government has
> already admitted it has engaged in false flags
> (Gulf of Tonkin), the fact that 6 out of the 10
> 9/11 commissioners said there were acts of
> criminality surrounding the 9/11 incident that
> they believed officials were hiding from the
> public, the fact that we sponsored al-quaeda from
> the beginning and are openly doing it now in
> Libya. So if you want to continue believing 2+2=5
> be my fucking guest.
You sir are simply wrong.
You think you are connecting the dots, but the dots you are connecting have nothing to do with each other as I see it.
"With a sea of information coming at us from all directions, how do we sift out the misinformation and bogus claims, and get to the truth? Michael Shermer of Skeptic Magazine lays out a "Baloney Detection Kit," ten questions we should ask when encountering a claim."
"The 10 Questions:
1. How reliable is the source of the claim?
2.Does the source make similar claims?
3. Have the claims been verified by somebody else?
4. Does this fit with the way the world works?
5. Has anyone tried to disprove the claim?
6. Where does the preponderance of evidence point?
7. Is the claimant playing by the rules of science?
8. Is the claimant providing positive evidence?
9. Does the new theory account for as many phenomena as the old theory?
10. Are personal beliefs driving the claim?"
Watch this, it will help you understand how normal people think.
http://youtu.be/eUB4j0n2UDU
9/11 was not an inside job