HAPPY EASTER!

Lol, how'd I figure it would be something like this?

Happy Easter folks!

==================================================================================================
"And if any women or children get their legs torn off, or faces caved in, well, it's tough shit for them." -2LT. Bert Stiles, 505th, 339th (On Berlin Bombardier Mission, 1944).

-----------------------------------------------

"...your suffering will be legendary even in Hell!"

This is how the Easter Bunny makes his eggs.
Attachments:

Easter is about Christ rising from the dead not bunnies.....those pictures are inappropriate but Happy Easter anyway...there is still hope for the sinners

show me the bunnyo

Ms. Ashamed Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Easter is about Christ rising from the dead not
> bunnies.....those pictures are inappropriate but
> Happy Easter anyway...there is still hope for the
> sinners

Kill yourself

Ms. Ashamed Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Easter is about Christ rising from the dead



ZOMBIE!

__________________________________
That's not a ladybug, that's a cannapiller.

No no no!!!

Pinhead the Cenobite Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> http://gallery.mtbr.com/data/mtbr/500/VBCat_Easter
> Bunny.jpg


Lol, awesome

Ms. Ashamed Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Easter is about Christ rising from the dead not
> bunnies.....those pictures are inappropriate but
> Happy Easter anyway...there is still hope for the
> sinners


Depends on how far back you want to go. The bunny predates the Christian celebration. It was a sign of new life and fertility for the new Spring season. Christianity just ripped off the earlier Pagan celebrations.

Twice a year, there is always someone who brings up the whole "Actually, it was a Pagan Holiday first" argument like it matters.

You think you're impressing people with that knowledge? It's so cliche... ("cliche" is cliche, I know)

What are you trying to accomplish with that argument? You think you're going to rock someone to the core, resulting in them dropping the whole Jesus thing and inspiring world peace?

Are you trying to destroy Christianity? Or are you just trying to ruin some people's holiday?

Either way, I think you're doing it wrong...

Signatures are for fags

Not at all Harry, but if Christians can shove Christ down my throat, I can reciprocate. :-) Personally, I don't care what anyone else believes or doesn't believe. It's a personal decision. Sorry if I offended you.

Shadow Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ms. Ashamed Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Easter is about Christ rising from the dead not
> > bunnies.....those pictures are inappropriate
> but
> > Happy Easter anyway...there is still hope for
> the
> > sinners
>
>
> Depends on how far back you want to go. The bunny
> predates the Christian celebration. It was a sign
> of new life and fertility for the new Spring
> season. Christianity just ripped off the earlier
> Pagan celebrations.


Wow, you're a fountain of information. Just be a little gracious and let people celebrate and be happy with friends and family if that's their thing. People like you are forever trying to put a damper or rain on some one elses feelings of joy. To no avail.

Ha! Don't try to get smug with me, Shadow... I'm not the God-fearing, Christian boy you're hoping for...

Your whole premise is that Christians are illogical simpletons who feel compelled to "cram" their ideologies down others' throats, yes?

Well, if they're illogical, why are you trying to "debate" with them using "logic"? How logical is that?

And you're justifying your "cramming" behavior with the "well, they did it first!" argument?

What about the third-party people who have to watch this constant dick-measuring contest?

Out of respect for Professor Pangloss, I won't call you an Atheist... I think "Anti-Christian" is more appropriate label.

You didn't offend me in the traditional "Oh, I can't believe what he said about Jesus" sense... I am completely comfortable with the fact that some people believe some wacky shit, most of the time for no reason..

Your duplicity, however, did offend me. You claim to be after a logical discussion. If you would like to have a logical discussion about the existence of (G)god, that's one thing... but "uncovering the truth" does not appear to be your motive.

Your approach smacks of having an axe to grind..

You come off looking like a guy taking pot-shots (cliche ones at that) at a group of illogical simpletons on one of their biggest holy days...

Edit: added "cramming"

Signatures are for fags



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/24/2011 02:31PM by Harry Tuttle.

Never claimed or accused anyone of being any kind of simpleton. Just pointing out the facts in response to "Easter is about Christ rising from the dead not bunnies" from anon Ms Ashamed.

So, yeah, I guess that's a little 'he did it first'.

There ya have it:

http://shine.yahoo.com/channel/parenting/the-easter-bunny-explained-2477414/

So we can all celebrate Eostre, the goddess of dawn, and STILL not have to call our Easter Eggs "Spring Spheres"!

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> HAPPY EASTER!
>
>
>
>
>


How ironic that you posted this photo considering this site was bombarded for months with troll posts containing a series of these pics.

interesting Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > HAPPY EASTER!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> How ironic that you posted this photo considering
> this site was bombarded for months with troll
> posts containing a series of these pics.



anonymous inkahootz post

bump

fuck that god rising from his grave shit. easter is about getting chocolate and candy!

.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/08/2012 07:09PM by Alias.

Shadow is a woman.

.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/08/2012 06:56PM by Alias.

You're hanging out with the wrong kind of man then, Alias.

aaaaaaaah Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fuck that god rising from his grave shit. easter
> is about getting chocolate and candy!

That is evidently what Obama believes. (Just an interesting observation on the ability of the Obama WH to address most Muslim holidays, and either Omit or entirely mis-represent Christian holidays).

What? No Easter Greeting?
http://www.whitehousedossier.com/2011/04/25/easter-greeting/
...And as I noted last week, the president released a Passover greeting this month that compared the ancient Jewish exodus from Egypt to the Arab political awakening this year, which would be a beautiful thing if most Arabs didn’t seek Israel’s destruction.

The president is, of course, hosting the Easter Egg Roll at the White House today. But Easter isn’t really about rolling eggs on a manicured lawn, now is it?

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Leave it to the Reginator to post a whiny, pissy, Fox News-citing, (did i mention whiny?) "news" article/source.

You're a fucking putz, Reggie....just a fucking PUTZ.

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/25/2011 12:16PM by fairfaxdude.

fairfaxdude Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Leave it to the Reginator to post a whiny, pissy,
> Fox News-citing, (did i mention whiny?) "news"
> article/source.
>
> You're a fucking putz, Reggie....just a fucking
> PUTZ.

Leave it to Fairy to post whiny, pissy - douche-like - responses to anything I might post. Way to get your fag on today Fairy. Obviously you haven't gotten enough attention lately - so please, feel free to respond so we can go at it like always.

Stupid ass.

EDIT: Oh yeah, and whew, make sure to quickly jump in to any thread eesh might have posted in or started. You are quite the attention whore there Fairy. Although from the way you post, you could just be an eesh.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/25/2011 12:20PM by Registered Voter.

No, Registered Voter, I am not Fairfaxdude, but I find it hilarious and sad that you take a generic Easter thread and attempt to turn it into an anti-black man in the White House rant.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No, Registered Voter, I am not Fairfaxdude, but I
> find it hilarious and sad that you take a generic
> Easter thread and attempt to turn it into an
> anti-black man in the White House rant.

And leave it to you to take a comment that has nothing to do with race and try to make it one. Maybe you should look in the mirror Mr Race-Baiter. You really should leave your race card at home eesh - you play it way too often. Especially when you have nothing.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/25/2011 12:54PM by Registered Voter.

Um, RV....this thread was about Easter, how did you turn it into one of your many hate the black man anti-Obama rants?

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Um, RV....this thread was about Easter, how did
> you turn it into one of your many hate the black
> man anti-Obama rants?

Probably because you and your Fairy friend responded to it huh? I merely equated the comment on dumbing down Easter to nothing to do with religion and the way it is played out by the WH. I guess you have a little prickly hair up your ass about it (or maybe that is just Fairy's dick) - ah I get the picture now in your first post, you and Fairy (you in drag of course).

Maybe you should just go back to ignoring me eesh-tard.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No, Registered Voter, I am not Fairfaxdude, but I
> find it hilarious and sad that you take a generic
> Easter thread and attempt to turn it into an
> anti-black man in the White House rant.


How many ham, egg, & cheese sandwiches do you think Registered Voter finished off this morning? Four? Five?

die osterhasen Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > No, Registered Voter, I am not Fairfaxdude, but
> I
> > find it hilarious and sad that you take a
> generic
> > Easter thread and attempt to turn it into an
> > anti-black man in the White House rant.
>
>
> How many ham, egg, & cheese sandwiches do you
> think Registered Voter finished off this morning?
> Four? Five?


Don't know; what I do know is that RV lies about being married and having children. He did admit he is in his early 50s, so I guess lying on the internet makes him feel better about being a middle aged man void of anything meaningful in his life. He also gets real sensitive and defensive when people call him a fat ass, my guess is he is one eclair from heart failure.

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That is evidently what Obama believes. (Just an
> interesting observation on the ability of the
> Obama WH to address most Muslim holidays, and
> either Omit or entirely mis-represent Christian
> holidays).
>
> What? No Easter Greeting?
> http://www.whitehousedossier.com/2011/04/25/easter
> -greeting/
> ...And as I noted last week, the president
> released a Passover greeting this month that
> compared the ancient Jewish exodus from Egypt to
> the Arab political awakening this year, which
> would be a beautiful thing if most Arabs didn’t
> seek Israel’s destruction.
>
> The president is, of course, hosting the Easter
> Egg Roll at the White House today. But Easter
> isn’t really about rolling eggs on a manicured
> lawn, now is it?

My biggest gripe with you is how you're clearly an intelligent person, but you're so biased that you refuse to acknowledge anything that doesn't fit into your narrative. Consequently, most of your arguments come across as ignorant and ill-informed.

Further down in the article you posted:

In 2010, Obama was criticized for releasing an all-inclusive Easter greeting. He reached out to Jews, Muslims, Hindus, and people of no faith at all in a statement about a holiday that is uniquely Christian.

So he's criticized for releasing an Easter statement, and criticized for not releasing an Easter statement? How does that work? Also, would you have defended him if you overheard people criticizing him for giving an Easter statement since you clearly think that he should?

It also took me an additional thirty seconds to find out what he DID do for Easter this year:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/04/19/white-house-hosts-2nd-annual-easter-prayer-breakfast

Friends, today President Obama hosted a beautiful prayer breakfast honoring Easter in the East Room of the White House. He is the first President to host such an event for Easter, and was honored to be joined by pastors and leaders from around the nation to celebrate Holy Week.

From the transcript of his speech:

I wanted to host this breakfast for a simple reason -– because as busy as we are, as many tasks as pile up, during this season, we are reminded that there’s something about the resurrection -- something about the resurrection of our savior, Jesus Christ, that puts everything else in perspective.

Yeah, he's obviously only a couple weeks away from implementing Sharia law in America.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Don't know; what I do know is that RV lies about
> being married and having children. He did admit he
> is in his early 50s, so I guess lying on the
> internet makes him feel better about being a
> middle aged man void of anything meaningful in his
> life. He also gets real sensitive and defensive
> when people call him a fat ass, my guess is he is
> one eclair from heart failure.

Well, based on all that - your caricature of me might be ready to die. Unfortunately you are entirely and totally wrong in all your suppositions and conclusions. What is more pathetic - that you fantasize about what my life might be like - or that you are totally wrong about them? It is fun to watch though.

What I suppose is the most pathetic though is that you spend almost your entire life on this forum attempting to "figure out" who all the other posters are and what they do. Is it really that important to you - oh right, you need to be able to intimidate when you have no other answers. Way to go eesh-tard, you are "winning".

Fucking lol.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> My biggest gripe with you is how you're clearly an
> intelligent person, but you're so biased that you
> refuse to acknowledge anything that doesn't fit
> into your narrative. Consequently, most of your
> arguments come across as ignorant and
> ill-informed.
>

Yes Meph, you just can't stand if there is any hint of bias in a post. God forbid we were all politically correct and held no one to account for their political beliefs as well. I know you have never posted anything here that sounded or looked ignorant. Right....

> Further down in the article you posted:
>
> In 2010, Obama was criticized for releasing an
> all-inclusive Easter greeting. He reached out to
> Jews, Muslims, Hindus, and people of no faith at
> all in a statement about a holiday that is
> uniquely Christian.

The criticism on the Easter statement was that the only public comments he made were about equating Easter with other religions, and yet for the Muslim holidays he made a point of putting out a full public statement, and didn't try to include Jews and Christians in theirs. Great, he hosted a prayer breakfast - for which Bush would have been criticized up one side and down the other for making the WH too much about religion. And where does the story break? On the Whitehouse BLOG site. Oh yeah - with the MSM right out there... not saying a thing about it.

>
> So he's criticized for releasing an Easter
> statement, and criticized for not releasing an
> Easter statement? How does that work? Also, would
> you have defended him if you overheard people
> criticizing him for giving an Easter statement
> since you clearly think that he should?
>

Actually, I don't think he should give a public statement on ANY religion. He should attend whatever church he feels is appropriate for himself and his family, and leave the religion at home. Maybe if he was more consistent with that approach. I never really like the fact that Bush pushed for a lot of prayer meetings and such while he was in office, that definitely sent the wrong message, and was too much of an "in-your-face" approach to things.

> It also took me an additional thirty seconds to
> find out what he DID do for Easter this year:
>
> http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/04/19/white-ho
> use-hosts-2nd-annual-easter-prayer-breakfast
>
> Friends, today President Obama hosted a beautiful
> prayer breakfast honoring Easter in the East Room
> of the White House. He is the first President to
> host such an event for Easter, and was honored to
> be joined by pastors and leaders from around the
> nation to celebrate Holy Week.

Yes, he is such a ground breaker on hosting religious events. Where is the MSM on this again? Hosting religious events in the Whitehouse always caused quite an upraor from MSM when Bush was in office. But the only thing they want to report on this year is the easter egg event - that is so obviously what the celebration is all about lol.

> Yeah, he's obviously only a couple weeks away from
> implementing Sharia law in America.

Never said that. And I don't believe that.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Aaaaaaand the classic "but Bush" retort. Ok, RV. Whatever you say.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Aaaaaaand the classic "but Bush" retort. Ok, RV.
> Whatever you say.


Translation: 'I'm rubber, you're glue...'

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Aaaaaaand the classic "but Bush" retort. Ok, RV.
> Whatever you say.

Hey Meph - I never said I wasn't biased. But yeah, the classic "Bush" retort because - oh yeah - truth is, right? Ok Meph, the classic "phhht, whatever" response when you can't even admit that it is true.

There are some ways I am very liberal, but I would never support the Democratic party. I will support some Democrats, but not if all they do is follow the party line. Same thing for Republicans - although arguably I am closer to their side of the "argument" than others. Unfortunately for all of us, when they get to the Federal level, they are no longer the people we voted for - they are just a cog in some machine being run by all the folks that should have been run out of office a long time ago.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
Unfortunately for all of
> us, when they get to the Federal level, they are
> no longer the people we voted for - they are just
> a cog in some machine being run by all the folks
> that should have been run out of office a long
> time ago.


well said

RV, I don't want you to see this as an insult and I'm very serious when I ask this question.

Do you think you could go for one month without watching Fox news? At all? This means no going to Fox news online or any site of channel associated with Fox.

Clearly you get most, if not all your news from Fox. Is Fox like a drug to you?

Do you believe in Fox news' imaginary war on Christmas (and now Easter)?

Now that Bill O'Reilly and Glen Beck have lost all credibility, will you still continue to buy their books?

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> RV, I don't want you to see this as an insult and
> I'm very serious when I ask this question.
>
> Do you think you could go for one month without
> watching Fox news? At all? This means no going to
> Fox news online or any site of channel associated
> with Fox.
>

The only time I watch Fox News is sometimes in the morning, and sometimes I watch O'Reilly, and that is about it. I probably watch Jon Stewart more often.

I have a Google page setup with NY Times, Google top stories, and a bunch of tech story aggregators. Other than that, I take a look at Drudge. That is about it. I don't form my opinion from Fox News - what I do note though is usually when the guys on here start posting their come backs they are completely following the HuffPo/Media Matters talking points (and that I do know since I glance over at those pages also to see what BS they are spouting). But again, NY Times latest story feed, and Google top stories are my home page, not Drudge, or Fox, or CNN, etc. Today, the story I linked to came from Drudge - speaking of which, the WH response is about on par.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/04/25/whs_carney_laughs_off_obama_not_giving_easter_statement.html

Linked from RealClearPolitics.com via Drudge.

> Clearly you get most, if not all your news from
> Fox. Is Fox like a drug to you?

Clearly I don't. So your supposition is totally wrong.

>
> Do you believe in Fox news' imaginary war on
> Christmas (and now Easter)?
>

I believe the MSM has played a large part in trying to dumb down anything religious. And by that, I mean paint any religion tied to conservatives in our country in a bad light. They make a point of ignoring a lot of stories that would clearly show Muslims in a bad light, but play up every story they can of Christians doing something in a bad light. And while I am not an avid Church-goer, I don't think the MSM and politicians should be working with the ACLU to try and set a religious/political/PC agenda for the country. They should (all of them) stick to whatever religion they believe in at home, and stop trying to push the anti-religious agenda on everyone. At the same time, you don't want to watch evangelicals (I certainly don't) then change the fucking channel, or don't go to their church - simple as that.

> Now that Bill O'Reilly and Glen Beck have lost all
> credibility, will you still continue to buy their
> books?

Glen Beck is just another doomsayer - although lately with the economics data and the devaluation of the dollar, he is starting to look a lot smarter than most of the folks in the room when he has been schilling for Gold.

EDIT: I just find it amazingly obtuse that the left in this country wants to embrace/excuse Muslims of all stripes, and yet go hyper on anti-Christian themes. Yeah, I get it that Catholic priests are gay, or pedophiles - kind of obvious given their prohibitions from acting like normal human beings. But I also get that radical Muslims are generally very happy to kill civilians and blow people up on a regular basis. Equal time. Make all religions look good or bad, or just keep it to yourself.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/25/2011 02:29PM by Registered Voter.

Hey RV,

Did you ever see the movie "El Golfo de California"?

Registered Voter Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------
> The only time I watch Fox News is sometimes in the
> morning, and sometimes I watch O'Reilly, and that
> is about it. I probably watch Jon Stewart more
> often.

very curious Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hey RV,
>
> Did you ever see the movie "El Golfo de
> California"?
>
> Registered Voter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> ----
> > The only time I watch Fox News is sometimes in
> the
> > morning, and sometimes I watch O'Reilly, and
> that
> > is about it. I probably watch Jon Stewart more
> > often.

What? A movie called the Gulf of California? Never even heard of it.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hey Meph - I never said I wasn't biased. But yeah,
> the classic "Bush" retort because - oh yeah -
> truth is, right? Ok Meph, the classic "phhht,
> whatever" response when you can't even admit that
> it is true.

This is another classic debate trick. "You can't admit that it's true" implies the point you're making is 100% correct, and I have two options: admit it or deny it. The point you made that I responded to is not correct, and bringing the past administration into the argument is completely irrelevant to the issue.

You wrote:

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > aaaaaaaah Wrote:
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > fuck that god rising from his grave shit.
> > easter is about getting chocolate and candy!
>
> That is evidently what Obama believes. (Just an
> interesting observation on the ability of the
> Obama WH to address most Muslim holidays, and
> either Omit or entirely mis-represent Christian
> holidays).

Factually incorrect. He is the first president to host an Easter prayer breakfast in celebration of the occasion. During his speech, Obama said, "I wanted to host this breakfast for a simple reason -– because as busy as we are, as many tasks as pile up, during this season, we are reminded that there’s something about the resurrection -- something about the resurrection of our savior, Jesus Christ, that puts everything else in perspective."

Obama's comment directly contradicts the concept that he believes Easter is about "chocolate and candy." He didn't just issue a statement about Easter like he did with Muslim holidays, he actually celebrated it.

> What? No Easter Greeting?
> http://www.whitehousedossier.com/2011/04/25/easter
> -greeting/
> ...And as I noted last week, the president
> released a Passover greeting this month that
> compared the ancient Jewish exodus from Egypt to
> the Arab political awakening this year, which
> would be a beautiful thing if most Arabs didn’t
> seek Israel’s destruction.
>
> The president is, of course, hosting the Easter
> Egg Roll at the White House today. But Easter
> isn’t really about rolling eggs on a manicured
> lawn, now is it?

It isn't. It's about celebrating the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, which Obama clearly did. Personally, I think it's more meaningful that the president celebrates it instead of just issuing a statement about how awesome Easter is. Personal opinion aside, the idea that he did not acknowledge this important Christian holiday is, again, factually incorrect.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

I had bunnyman for dinner last night

You can bet that RV isn't finished with you all yet!

But, its after 4:30, and now he has fired up the 1998 Accord and is hustling off to another Dinty Moore dinner feast. And then to browbeat his fictional 9 yr old into doing it's "homework", while he verbally abuses his pudgy lil wifey for that dirty kitchen floor.

But he'll be back....bright and early, with more Drudge/FOX sources to "prove" how wrong all of you are.

LOL

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.

Yes, I like how Obama celebrated Easter with this guy. You'd think he would steer clear of the "Reverend Wright" types with all the protesting he did when that controversy came up, and yet here he is with another race-baiting black man - who thinks that just because he is black, he can't be racist.

Obama’s Easter Sunday Pastor Rails Against Racist Talk Radio
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obamas-easter-sunday-pastorrails-against-racist-talk-radio-compares-rush-to-kkk/

Sounds like the guy eesh listens to - where everything gets equated to race somehow, when that is not even part of the discussion, and has nothing to do with it. If this had been Bush - and sorry the comparison is apt - the media would have noted how his priest had ties to big oil, or something similar.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

See? That's exactly what I'm talking about.

RV: "OBAMA THINKS EASTER IS ABOUT CANDY!!! HE DIDN'T EVEN CELEBRATE IT!!!"

Me: "Yes he did. Here's proof."

RV: *silence*

RV: "HE CELEBRATED EASTER WITH A RACIST!!!"

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> See? That's exactly what I'm talking about.
>
> RV: "OBAMA THINKS EASTER IS ABOUT CANDY!!! HE
> DIDN'T EVEN CELEBRATE IT!!!"
>
> Me: "Yes he did. Here's proof."
>
> RV: *silence*
>
> RV: "HE CELEBRATED EASTER WITH A RACIST!!!"


I have to give you that one, mephisto.

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> See? That's exactly what I'm talking about.
>
> RV: "OBAMA THINKS EASTER IS ABOUT CANDY!!! HE
> DIDN'T EVEN CELEBRATE IT!!!"
>
> Me: "Yes he did. Here's proof."
>
> RV: *silence*
>
> RV: "HE CELEBRATED EASTER WITH A RACIST!!!"

RV: AND EVEN IF ME CALLING SOME BLACK PREACHER A RACIST IS INACCURATE (SOME WOULD SAY RACE-BAITINGLY SO) IF IT WERE BUSH IT WOULDN'T BE FAIR!

RV: WAHHHHHHHHHH (POSTS ANOTHER DRUDGE/FOX ARTICLE)...SO THERE...WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

THE REST OF US: FUCK OFF AND DIE, RV.

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/26/2011 05:11PM by fairfaxdude.

.
Attachments:

bump

Happy Easter '16

I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Attachments:

.
Attachments:

Happy Easter Miz & Lizzie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> .


Thank you

I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Attachments:

Looks like he is about to break down in tears. :(

Yeah his fake ass forced smile is long gone as the reality has set in that he's violated his supervised release conditions and his bond will be revoked and he's facing a felony. No worries though, I emailed his probation officer and let her know.

I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning

.
Attachments:

.
Attachments: