Re: California 9th Circuit Court of Appeals HAS STOLEN $2 Billion in Wall Funds, saying it is now to be used for democrat election pay and purposes
Posted by:
Ignorance is no defense
()
Date: June 29, 2020 11:28AM
ty6hjtr Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> #1 the cash isn't part of a legal dispute - the
> legality of the wall has been decided (ie, it is
> not for one judge to overturn, CERTAINLY NOT)
>
> #2 it's illegal to seize cash before a trial,
> it's called "escrow" and it's illegal*
>
> (the only conditions allowing is if the "item in
> question" (property cash etc) is believed (but not
> proven) to be stolen and time sensitive - like
> fruit in a fruit truck going bad, or like cash
> being held by an opium who is being held on drug
> charges - situations where if the judge doesn't
> seize the money it will disappear. HOWEVER -
> there is absolutely 0 chance of 2 billion federal
> and military money disappearing UNLESS A DEMOCRAT
> JUDGE HAS STOLEN IT)
>
> #3 IT'S A SURE THING DEMOCRATS WILL NEVER GIVE
> THE CASH BACK UNLESS FORCED TO AGT GUN POINT
ty6hjtr Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> escrow is illegal (for 2,000 years it has been)
> for two reason:
>
> * legal injury by false prosectution
>
> * corrupt government and judges
>
> * because if it's yours the government shouldn't
> ever have their hands on it FOR ANY REASON
What law school did you go to?