Then what the heck is this?

HA. Long eared jerboa.



\
Attachments:

The weirdest looking animal on the planet, the star nosed mole.




\
Attachments:

Kirk Cameron says evolution doesn't exist because we never found a part-duck, part-alligator.

No wonder Boner killed himself.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/08/2010 02:56PM by WashingTone-Locian.

Awwww that first pic is cute!

The mole just made me terrified and I had a terrible accident.

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Kirk Cameron says evolution doesn't exist because
> we never found a part-duck, part-alligator.
>
> No wonder Boner killed himself.


Bananas PROVE intelligent design

Johnny Walker Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Kirk Cameron says evolution doesn't exist
> because
> > we never found a part-duck, part-alligator.
> >
> > No wonder Boner killed himself.
>
>
> Bananas PROVE intelligent design


If one wants proof of Natural Selection, consider that Boner off himself before he reproduced.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

I can't decide who I want to go extinct first, Kirk Cameron or Ray Comfort (Banana Man). Both set the human brain's evolution back 100,000 years.
Attachments:

The Deep Sea:















==================================================================================================
"And if any women or children get their legs torn off, or faces caved in, well, it's tough shit for them." -2LT. Bert Stiles, 505th, 339th (On Berlin Bombardier Mission, 1944).

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I can't decide who I want to go extinct first,
> Kirk Cameron or Ray Comfort (Banana Man). Both set
> the human brain's evolution back 100,000 years.


Actually, evolution is anti-intellectual. They cant explain something so they make believe the earth is really that old to support this antiquated theory created by a hack scientist.

Sounds like something Kirk Cameron's Kiwi Daddy said on Nightline...

DNAdesign Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Actually, evolution is anti-intellectual. They
> cant explain something so they make believe the
> earth is really that old to support this
> antiquated theory created by a hack scientist.

Come on. Everyone with two brain cells to rub together knows the Annunaki created man as a slave race to mine gold. So that makes the Earth's story a hybrid of evolution and creationism. Right?

DNAdesign Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Actually, evolution is anti-intellectual. They
> cant explain something so they make believe the
> earth is really that old to support this
> antiquated theory created by a hack scientist.


So....what is the "intellectual" answer?

I bet I can guess what it is...
[If you see a painting, it's logical to assume there was a painter. If there is a building, it's logical to assume there was a builder... The only logical conclusion when looking at living things is that there had to have been a creator! I watched that Nightline too, bitch!]
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So....what is the "intellectual" answer?

Harry Tuttle Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I bet I can guess what it is...
>


I don't see how Creationism is the intellectual alternative to evolution, since the latter is the one researching and finding answers.

I believe the intellectual answer has something to do with a giant turtle...

One of the best movies ever
The Neverending Story





---------------------------------------------------
W.W.S.D. what would Scooby Doo



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/10/2010 09:08PM by graymoose1.

Genevieve Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I believe the intellectual answer has something to
> do with a giant turtle...


Yes, the world and maybe even the universe are resting upon a giant turtle. But what is the turtle standing on?

Re: Don't Believe Evolution? Posted by: Yahweh ()
Date: March 10, 2010 09:16PM


Genevieve Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I believe the intellectual answer has something to
> do with a giant turtle...


Yes, the world and maybe even the universe are resting upon a giant turtle. But what is the turtle standing on?




Atlas?

---------------------------------------------------
W.W.S.D. what would Scooby Doo

graymoose1 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> One of the best movies ever
> The Neverending Story


It is truly a classic, it is a shame the sequels were garbage.

Watch your language kid....grow up!! "Any idiot can use foul language and most of them do" It only reflects you lack of vocabulary!!

Laws of genetics- for lack of a better term, can be broken down through repetitive cross breeding attempts and a little sheer luck mixed with environmental polution that fucks with the DNA or genetic code on a atomic or molecular level. Cross-breed animals do not prove evolution, by any standards.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Troll@AOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Laws of genetics- for lack of a better term, can
> be broken down through repetitive cross breeding
> attempts and a little sheer luck mixed with
> environmental polution that fucks with the DNA or
> genetic code on a atomic or molecular level.
> Cross-breed animals do not prove evolution, by any
> standards.


Everytime a bacteria becomes antibiotic resistant, that's an example of Natural Selection at work. Evolution is real.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Troll@AOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Laws of genetics- for lack of a better term, can
> be broken down through repetitive cross breeding
> attempts and a little sheer luck mixed with
> environmental polution that fucks with the DNA or
> genetic code on a atomic or molecular level.
> Cross-breed animals do not prove evolution, by any
> standards.


Do you think that it is all sheer luck, or perhaps some of those genetics are just slightly better equipped to deal with life then the others? If some of the genetics are just slightly better, and have a better shot at surviving, then would you find it reasonable to suppose that those genes would be proliferated? More of those successful genes would get passed on, correct?

If so, then you accept one of the tenants of the theory of evolution (natural selection).

I tend to agree with the professor. Mutations in DNA can cause a change in the species (which may benefit or hinder its survival). These mutations can only take hold in a small population. Humans will not evolve further in such a large civilization. It would take extreem isolation of a population or cutting the pop down to a village size for such mutations to take hold.

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------
> Everytime a bacteria becomes antibiotic resistant, that's an example of Natural
> Selection at work. Evolution is real.


That's not evolution. Your immune system has been changing your entire life, but your still a human right? And the bacteria is still bacteria. That is not evolution.

LOL I remember reading this old BBC article. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6057734.stm

Basically, technology will cause humans to split into two subspecies.




The descendants of the genetic upper class would be tall, slim, healthy, attractive, intelligent, and creative and a far cry from the "underclass" humans who would have evolved into dim-witted, ugly, squat goblin-like creatures.




Blessed are the murderous.

Who Cares Anyway Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Everytime a bacteria becomes antibiotic
> resistant, that's an example of Natural
> > Selection at work. Evolution is real.
>
>
> That's not evolution. Your immune system has been
> changing your entire life, but your still a human
> right? And the bacteria is still bacteria. That
> is not evolution.


Yes, that is proof.
But who cares anyways, right? Are you sure you're human? You're dim-witted; are you also an ugly, squat goblin-like creature?

Who Cares Anyway Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Everytime a bacteria becomes antibiotic
> resistant, that's an example of Natural
> > Selection at work. Evolution is real.
>
>
> That's not evolution. Your immune system has been
> changing your entire life, but your still a human
> right? And the bacteria is still bacteria. That
> is not evolution.


Evolution takes generations to manifest itself. The fact that you believe that my not evolving in my lifetime is proof that evolution doesn't exist speaks volumes about how stupid you are.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

-

Blessed are the murderous.
Attachments:

For an actual, intelligent discussion about the debate between evolution and intelligent design, watch the documentary Expelled:No Intelligence Allowed.
Ben Stein basically travels to top universities across the nation and talks with quite a few scientists who think modern science proves that the theory of evolution is flawed and lean toward intelligent design. Most of them are being blacklisted for stating this. Later, Richard Dawkins is being inteviewed by Ben Stein and states that he thinks aliens started life on earth. A very interesting video to watch.

reason Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> and lean toward
> intelligent design. Most of them are being
> blacklisted for stating this.

Intelligent design isn't science, therefore they should be blacklisted and be treated with ridicule.

Actually, if you watch the video, they have quite a bit a evidence to back up their claims. This isn't a religious video, it's a documentary and these scientists are from major state universities all across America.

reason Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> For an actual, intelligent discussion about the
> debate between evolution and intelligent design,
> watch the documentary Expelled:No Intelligence
> Allowed.
> Ben Stein basically travels to top universities
> across the nation and talks with quite a few
> scientists who think modern science proves that
> the theory of evolution is flawed and lean toward
> intelligent design. Most of them are being
> blacklisted for stating this. Later, Richard
> Dawkins is being inteviewed by Ben Stein and
> states that he thinks aliens started life on
> earth. A very interesting video to watch.


The problem with the label "Intelligent Design" is it has several extremes. It can go from "Evolution happened, sure, but look how complex and beautiful everything is. It must be part of a grand plan by some divine being!" which is really harmless to believe, in my opinion, although some hard-line Atheists would probably disagree. Then there's "The Bible is literal truth!" which ignores all evidence to the contrary and proponents of this fit any "evidence" they can find around their preconceived truth. This is not scientific and does no one any good. I welcome them to explore their theories, but I wouldn't want it taught in schools.

In the middle is where probably most Americans fall, where they believe not all is explained and they probably believe in God and Jesus and all that pretty much and some stuff in the Bible is real and some isn't really totally real exactly as it's said but it doesn't matter because the overall message is good and the theory of evolution has no direct impact on their lives so who gives a fuck about this shit anyways we may as well be arguing about Algebra as far as I'm concerned.

That said I do want to visit the ID museum in Tennessee or wherever sometime for shits and grins.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 08/12/2010 02:46PM by Johnny Walker.

reason Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> For an actual, intelligent discussion about the
> debate between evolution and intelligent design,
> watch the documentary Expelled:No Intelligence
> Allowed.
> Ben Stein basically travels to top universities
> across the nation and talks with quite a few
> scientists who think modern science proves that
> the theory of evolution is flawed and lean toward
> intelligent design. Most of them are being
> blacklisted for stating this. Later, Richard
> Dawkins is being inteviewed by Ben Stein and
> states that he thinks aliens started life on
> earth. A very interesting video to watch.


The reason these guys are being ridiculed is that they point to gaps in the theory of Evolution and instead of offering a scientifically valid alternative, they say, "Must be God," without anything to back it up.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

reason Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Actually, if you watch the video, they have quite
> a bit a evidence to back up their claims. This
> isn't a religious video, it's a documentary and
> these scientists are from major state universities
> all across America.

Name a study where they have used the scientific method to test and prove that a supernatural being designed the universe.

reason Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> For an actual, intelligent discussion about the
> debate between evolution and intelligent design,
> watch the documentary Expelled:No Intelligence
> Allowed.

I've seen the movie and it's ridiculous. He manages to find a small group of outcast scientists that were ridiculed for choosing to believe in fairy tales over solid scientific evidence.


> Ben Stein basically travels to top universities
> across the nation and talks with quite a few
> scientists who think modern science proves that
> the theory of evolution is flawed and lean toward
> intelligent design.

And none give a reasonable explanation.


> Most of them are being
> blacklisted for stating this.


They are NOT being "Blacklisted", they are just being called out (or sacked) because they were imposing their non-proven ideas on students without the permission of the universities.


> Later, Richard
> Dawkins is being inteviewed by Ben Stein and
> states that he thinks aliens started life on
> earth.


Sound bites taken completely out of context and edited together to make it sound that way. Dawkins has addressed this many times. What he actually said is that it's just as possible that an alien life form created the universe as it is that God created it. He doesn't believe that either is responsible.



> A very interesting video to watch.

In that Ben Stein shows what a complete idiot he is and how badly he's been duped. Now he wants to dupe other people like "reason".

Who Cares Anyway Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Everytime a bacteria becomes antibiotic
> resistant, that's an example of Natural
> > Selection at work. Evolution is real.
>
>
> That's not evolution. Your immune system has been
> changing your entire life, but your still a human
> right? And the bacteria is still bacteria. That
> is not evolution.


You are confusing lamarkianism with evolution. You are further confusing common descent with the theory of evolution.

reason Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> For an actual, intelligent discussion about the
> debate between evolution and intelligent design,
> watch the documentary Expelled:No Intelligence
> Allowed.
> Ben Stein basically travels to top universities
> across the nation and talks with quite a few
> scientists who think modern science proves that
> the theory of evolution is flawed and lean toward
> intelligent design. Most of them are being
> blacklisted for stating this. Later, Richard
> Dawkins is being inteviewed by Ben Stein and
> states that he thinks aliens started life on
> earth. A very interesting video to watch.

I've seen "Expelled", it was pure rhetoric.

Thing about this - what was the theory of intelligent design? Was it detailed or even generally mentioned in the film?

WTL said:
>the THEORY of EVOLUTION has GAPS.

This is an understatement, because the theory itself is counter-intuitive and goes against everything that surrounds you.

You've got GAPS, but the inteligent design people DON'T.
You say you need a 'scientific experiment' to prove it, well first work on your GAPS, then you guys should have all the proof/ experimenting done for us all wraped up in a nice neat little explanation.

But since you HAVE NOT/ CAN NOT provide such, it is fairly safe to say you evolutionist theorizers are WRONG.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Troll@AOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WTL said:
> >the THEORY of EVOLUTION has GAPS.
>
> This is an understatement, because the theory
> itself is counter-intuitive and goes against
> everything that surrounds you.
>
> You've got GAPS, but the inteligent design people
> DON'T.
> You say you need a 'scientific experiment' to
> prove it, well first work on your GAPS, then you
> guys should have all the proof/ experimenting done
> for us all wraped up in a nice neat little
> explanation.
>
> But since you HAVE NOT/ CAN NOT provide such, it
> is fairly safe to say you evolutionist theorizers
> are WRONG.

Scientific method and "scientific experiment" are not the same thing. We have a fossil record that demonstrates natural selection at work...



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

I always wondered about that. Why are humans generally getting taller then? Do we have to reach higher shelves or something? Is it the 10 foot rim in basketball? I mean why are we getting taller? Maybe the giraffe got taller 'just because' that allowed it to access the taller trees - rather than saying all the short giraffes died because they could reach the trees and only the taller ones survived due to natural selection.

I dunno, just speculating.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/12/2010 03:43PM by Registered Voter.

WTL,

we have fossils demonstrating a process of 'natural selection' NOT the 'THEORY of EVOLUTION'.

Besides what about the 300 million year old HORSE SHOE CRAB? Why didn't HE EVOLVE?

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I always wondered about that. Why are humans
> generally getting taller then?

Better nutrition during childrens' growth phases?

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Registered Voter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I always wondered about that. Why are humans
> > generally getting taller then?
>
> Better nutrition during childrens' growth phases?

Well sure, that would be my take on it. But you could have probably made a similar argument for giraffes.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Registered Voter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I always wondered about that. Why are humans
> > generally getting taller then?
>
> Better nutrition during childrens' growth phases?



Yeah, I read about this before. Humans in general have only been our current height since the mid-19th century.

Studies have shown that some Europeans, like the Dutch and Germans, are still getting taller and could get near 7 feet by the next century.

Blessed are the murderous.

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> TheMeeper Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Registered Voter Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > I always wondered about that. Why are humans
> > > generally getting taller then?
> >
> > Better nutrition during childrens' growth
> phases?
>
> Well sure, that would be my take on it. But you
> could have probably made a similar argument for
> giraffes.


Why would giraffes be getting better nutrition for their children? Has the diet of giraffes changed over time as the result of their moving towards civilization and use of technology?

I knew that one would stump you.

See in the begining, the planet was in a state of naturally perfect harmony (God's Garden of Eden). Enter in 'the fall from grace' of humanity and disease and germs and viruses and bacteria and pollution, and you have ripe conditions for genetic mutations.

Did you know that the bacteria has the smallest ELECTRIC MOTOR known to man? It is true. Bacteria propel themselves with an electrically operated tail.

Bacteria is the seemingly mechanical robot OPPOSITE of the creative juices of life known as semen. A bacteria and sperm cell even look similar under a microscope!

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Troll@AOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WTL,
>
> we have fossils demonstrating a process of
> 'natural selection' NOT the 'THEORY of
> EVOLUTION'.
>
> Besides what about the 300 million year old HORSE
> SHOE CRAB? Why didn't HE EVOLVE?


Jesus. Darwin's book is called The Origin of Species as a short-hand reference. The real name of his book is On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.

Natural selection has EVERYTHING to do with Evolution.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Troll@AOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WTL,
>
> we have fossils demonstrating a process of
> 'natural selection' NOT the 'THEORY of
> EVOLUTION'.
>
> Besides what about the 300 million year old HORSE
> SHOE CRAB? Why didn't HE EVOLVE?


Just because you didnt pay attention in high school science class, dont hold it against us.
If people want to ignore reason and science, fine I dont care. The masses need religion to keep them in line anyways.

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> But you
> could have probably made a similar argument for giraffes.

I don't know much about the nutrional history of giraffes, but it's logical that taller giraffes have better access to food (less competition for the food higher on the trees), therefore a better survival rate over time. During that time they pass their height genes on to their offspring, and over a long period time the shorter giraffes eventually die out.

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Registered Voter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > But you
> > could have probably made a similar argument for
> giraffes.
>
> I don't know much about the nutrional history of
> giraffes, but it's logical that taller giraffes
> have better access to food (less competition for
> the food higher on the trees), therefore a better
> survival rate over time. During that time they
> pass their height genes on to their offspring, and
> over a long period time the shorter giraffes
> eventually die out.

Yes. RV seems to have forgotten that short people haven't died out like the short-necked giraffe.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> TheMeeper Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Registered Voter Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > >
> > > But you
> > > could have probably made a similar argument
> for
> > giraffes.
> >
> > I don't know much about the nutrional history
> of
> > giraffes, but it's logical that taller giraffes
> > have better access to food (less competition
> for
> > the food higher on the trees), therefore a
> better
> > survival rate over time. During that time they
> > pass their height genes on to their offspring,
> and
> > over a long period time the shorter giraffes
> > eventually die out.
>
> Yes. RV seems to have forgotten that short people
> haven't died out like the short-necked giraffe.

Well no - but people ARE getting taller. And over a few thousand years, maybe it was just because there was a flood and all the short giraffes drowned :)

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> maybe it was just because
> there was a flood and all the short giraffes
> drowned :)


Yes, because they couldn't keep their heads above water. Even God believes in natural selection.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

lol, listen to this dumbass answer about giraffes from an intelligent design website:

"Mammals also show God’s workings in nature. One prime example is the giraffe. Like the woodpecker, this animal may seem familiar enough externally, but internally it is quite incredible. Since the giraffe has such a large neck, it has a very large and powerful heart to pump the blood to the brain. Theoretically, the immense pressure of the blood pumped by this massive heart would rupture blood vessels in the brain if the giraffe moved its head downward! In reality, however, the giraffe is able to execute such an action with no damage at all. The way in which it does this is amazing. Valves in the arteries of the neck close whenever the giraffe bends its head down, limiting the flow of blood to the brain. The blood that is not stopped goes into the “rete mirabile,†a sponge-like cluster of vessels under the brain. Since the brain receives the blood indirectly from the rete mirabile, it is not damaged by any high pressures. When the giraffe lifts its head up, the valves open and the rete mirabile brings more blood to the brain. In addition, some valves in the neck veins close to equalize the blood pressure. This prevents the giraffe from fainting from lack of oxygen when it gets up! When we look at this whole system we immediately see that any defect or incompleteness in it would result in serious consequences for the giraffe. It could never have evolved gradually over billions of years! Indeed, only God could create something this wonderful[22].

Evolution is dangerous; together with its allies of atheism and rationalism, it can cause, and has caused a great deal of spiritual damage to souls. It is also widespread; nearly all of the museums, schools, and colleges of the country accept it as their creed. Because of this, it sometimes can be difficult to combat. However, by demonstrating the glories of God’s creation, we can effectively overthrow evolution and restore creationism as the true foundation of science."

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

The short giraffes were the sinful ones.

WTL,

please stop demonstrating your dumbass.
As I suspected, NO RATIONAL COMEBACK, just insults.

So please, tell me, if 'natural selection' reigns supreme, then why NO change in the Horse Shoe Crab for 300 million years?

This question alone seems simple enough to me.

.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Troll@AOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> So please, tell me, if 'natural selection' reigns
> supreme, then why NO change in the Horse Shoe Crab
> for 300 million years?


Because their habitat hasn't changed enough to warrant it.

BS. What about the rest of the creatures in the SAME habitat?

How about the Aligator, does he live in some hermetically sealed and sanitized environment also?

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

interesting!
Attachments:

Troll,
A lot of evolution has to do with adapting to ones environment. When a species undergoes a genetic mutation that benefits life in its environment, it tends to thrive and pass those genes on to further generations. Over millions of years and lots of mutations, different variations slowly develop from that species. It doesn't mean that species has to die off. It just means other variations are formed.

Dogs are a good example. Siberian Huskys come from northern regions of the world because they adapted over time to cold weather. Chihuahuas are mostly found in warmer regions because they adapted to their environment.

The reason animals are camouflaged so well in jungles and deserts is because of mutations over a long time that benefited their environment. The species that didn't adapt, died off.

Evolution is very easy to understand if you just take a few hours and read about it. I've tried to put this in the simplest terms possible without sounding condescending. I hope you get it.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/12/2010 05:11PM by Numbers.

warning: *** DUMBEST POST, EVER ^ ^ ^

Hey 'Numbers',

I hope YOU 'get this':
If you think Chihuahuas adapted to their environment for their bennefit, and they are not/ were not CROSS BRED by HUMANS; you just might be the dumbest person I have ever spoken with. Check out the Rat Terrier, he's only been around for about 50 years, since the days of Roosevelt.

I hope you keep reading this thread, OVER and OVER and OVER, till that is; 'you get it'.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Fucking Rosalvelt that commie.

Troll,
It would be difficult these days to find any breed of dog that hasn't bred with other breeds. Whether by human or naturalistic means of interbreeding, new variations arise. BtW, The Chihuahua has been around for a very long time and is a good example of a warm region breed of dog, which is the point I'm trying to make.

Do you really believe that every species of animal was created by God on the same day? If you do, there is no point in carrying on with the conversation.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/12/2010 06:31PM by Numbers.

Surely I do, WHO are you to say any differently?

What's the matter? Don't feel alone in your little world anymore?


.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Troll@AOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> So please, tell me, if 'natural selection' reigns
> supreme, then why NO change in the Horse Shoe Crab
> for 300 million years?
>


Horse Shoe Crabs haven't evolved because they haven't had a need to. Just like cockroaches and crocodiles...

http://www.horseshoecrab.org/evo/evo.html

Simply because a handful of species were well adapted to survive a variety of climates doesn't mean evolution hasn't impact most other species.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> Evolution is very easy to understand if you just
> take a few hours and read about it. I've tried to
> put this in the simplest terms possible without
> sounding condescending. I hope you get it.


Troll can't understand it. It's all about "Jesus Magic."

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

GAY Post by an even GAYer FAGGOT ^ ^ ^

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Troll@AOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> GAY Post by an even GAYer FAGGOT ^ ^ ^


The truth is the one or two examples you can point to as being evidence of evolution not existing are not evidence at all. At the same time, you offer nothing to contradict the overwhelming evidence that natural selection and evolution do exist. Call me faggot or whatever. The truth is, you are wrong.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Horse Shoe Crabs haven't evolved because they
> haven't had a need to.


Me feel like writing poetry, composing symphonies and shit.

Me need to evolve!

RRRrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!

I... can... feel... it....

I'm evolving.........................














Ready for Fairfax Underground!

So WTL,
you are trying to tell me that God would only allow for racial purity and cross breeding is not allowed in a world created by him? So you think that in a world created by God, there is no room for existing creatures to get better through adapting to imperfect environments full of all kinds of pollution and disease?

Pretty shallow, my friend.


.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Troll@AOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So WTL,
> you are trying to tell me that God would only
> allow for racial purity and cross breeding is not
> allowed in a world created by him? So you think
> that in a world created by God, there is no room
> for existing creatures to get better through
> adapting to an imperfect environments full of all
> kinds of pollution and disease?
>
> Pretty shallow, my friend.
>


No, what we're saying is you didn't need a God to start with and that these things take place with or without him/her/it.

Why do you have to have a God in the equation?


> .

Don't act like you didn't see what the anon user 'SoulStirrer' wrote in a seperate thread:

>What Scientists won't tell you, is a majority of the Atheistic-Humanists that promote Evolution and its teachings, are also stanch racists. They do believe in a Hitler idea of evolution. They believe the white race is superior. And that black people are more ape like in the evolutionary ladder and other races are less intelligent. This is true. They will not teach you this in mainstream science- they try to hide this.

How could an intelligent person believe in Evoltion- and not accept Alt theories? They are brainwashed. If a person of faith believes in Creation, it doesnt mean they are not open. It means that they see things differently- but you know they are saying look- you say Evolution did all this. We're saying- no there are other things that can't be explained through this conventional way of thinking. But Evolution definitely is the ULTIMATE LIE from Satan to make more and more non-believers.

Someone said that it is "pride" that makes Christians believe we are separate from the animals. You know that is A LIE. Christians believe humans are not above animals. Yet we were distinctly made in GODS IMAGE- and therefor, we are different. The divine Creator actually made us not much more than animals- as we are below the angels and their levels.

EVOLUTION IS E-VIL.


THANKS for that valuable contribution SoulStirrer.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Troll@AOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So WTL,
> you are trying to tell me that God would only
> allow for racial purity and cross breeding is not
> allowed in a world created by him? So you think
> that in a world created by God, there is no room
> for existing creatures to get better through
> adapting to imperfect environments full of all
> kinds of pollution and disease?
>
> Pretty shallow, my friend.
>
>
> .


God is all-knowing and all-powerful. How come he didn't know Lucifer was going to rebel and had no way to stop him?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

@Troll

Now you are going with that ridiculous Hitler argument. The Nazis practiced Eugenics, not Evolution. Eugenics is about the purity of race. Evolutionists are unbiased about the moral implications of natural selection, because there are no moral implications. Change is neither good nor bad. It's simply change. Nature will determine if it increases or decreases a being's ability to survive. Humans should have no direct say in it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Brah, I been TRYING to evolve.

Bustin my ass, more like it.

But the shit AIN'T as easy as it looks!

Anyway, after x thousands of years, I call bullshit on gradualism.

That shit is Santa Claus, Flying Spaghetti Monster, whatever.

Evolution by creeps, basically.

I'm laying my bankroll on punctuated equilibrium.

Now that shit is the shit, man!

Dennett can kiss my sweet red ass.

Fuckin Darwinian fundamentalist.

Godwin's Law is in full swing i see

Get it God-wins law? Har Har Har!

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Troll@AOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Get it God-wins law? Har Har Har!


barkin up the wrong tree troll. im agnostic and fully believe evolution. i dont see why having an all creating god disproves evolution, or evolution disproving the existence of a god. you can argue till your teeth turn blue and get nowhere. my 2 cents costs 10 bucks. i have a paypal account so PM me and i will give you the payment details.

Troll@AOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Get it God-wins law? Har Har Har!


You have no idea how stupid you look right now.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Actually check out how I spelled it, don't act like I don't have Google
also, you nit-wit Washingtone-Locian.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Bloody B wrote:
> dont see why having an all creating god disproves evolution,
IT DOES NOT

> or evolution disproving the existence of a god.
IT DOES NOT

-thanks for clarifying BB!

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

I did not evolve from a monkey unlike....

Explain Pokemon then, God-boy.

Troll@AOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WTL said:
> >the THEORY of EVOLUTION has GAPS.
>
> This is an understatement, because the theory
> itself is counter-intuitive and goes against
> everything that surrounds you.
>
> You've got GAPS, but the inteligent design people
> DON'T.

There is no such theory as 'intelligent design'. Intelligent design is 'magic'.

Ergo, it's not science and is simply absurd. Best to just admit that you don't know then to appeal to magic.

> You say you need a 'scientific experiment' to
> prove it, well first work on your GAPS, then you
> guys should have all the proof/ experimenting done
> for us all wraped up in a nice neat little
> explanation.

There are 'gaps' in the theory of relativity, does that mean that atoms don't exist?

Your position is silly.

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I always wondered about that. Why are humans
> generally getting taller then? Do we have to reach
> higher shelves or something? Is it the 10 foot rim
> in basketball? I mean why are we getting taller?
> Maybe the giraffe got taller 'just because' that
> allowed it to access the taller trees - rather
> than saying all the short giraffes died because
> they could reach the trees and only the taller
> ones survived due to natural selection.
>
> I dunno, just speculating.

Humans are getting taller because we have better nutrition.

Troll@AOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WTL,
>
> we have fossils demonstrating a process of
> 'natural selection' NOT the 'THEORY of
> EVOLUTION'.
>
> Besides what about the 300 million year old HORSE
> SHOE CRAB? Why didn't HE EVOLVE?


You are confusing the theory of evolution with common descent.

Why would a successfully adapted creature need to evolve? Further, what you mean is why are they still around - since they have evolved from 300 million years ago - it's just they have not had any morphological changes.

Troll@AOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I knew that one would stump you.
>
> See in the begining, the planet was in a state of
> naturally perfect harmony (God's Garden of Eden).
> Enter in 'the fall from grace' of humanity and
> disease and germs and viruses and bacteria and
> pollution, and you have ripe conditions for
> genetic mutations.

How did the fall effect genetics? Did God wave a magic wand over Adam and mutate all his genes?

What are 'perfect genes'?

> Did you know that the bacteria has the smallest
> ELECTRIC MOTOR known to man? It is true.
> Bacteria propel themselves with an electrically
> operated tail.

No, it doesn't. You are begging the question.

> Bacteria is the seemingly mechanical robot
> OPPOSITE of the creative juices of life known as
> semen. A bacteria and sperm cell even look
> similar under a microscope!

This is ignorant and silly.

Well, if you want to shoot something down because there are gaps in the scientific record, I suggest you not look too closely at God.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Lot of arguments pointing out that a species adapts over time. No argument from me there. However, where is the fossil or other evidence of one species evolving into an entire different species? That is where my problem with the THEORY of evolution exists.

Pondering Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lot of arguments pointing out that a species
> adapts over time. No argument from me there.
> However, where is the fossil or other evidence of
> one species evolving into an entire different
> species? That is where my problem with the THEORY
> of evolution exists.


There are squirrels that can't breed with each other because they have adapted into to two different, but similar species. There are tons of examples of this.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Different, but similar species? I'm talking about how evolution claims that a monkey became a man. Two entirely different species. Not two types of similar squirrels. If all the claims are true, why do I not see any fossil or other evidence of say, a dog evolving into a cow. If we all came from slime and then evolved to a monkey and then to a human, there should be plenty of examples, yet I see none.

Pondering Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lot of arguments pointing out that a species
> adapts over time. No argument from me there.
> However, where is the fossil or other evidence of
> one species evolving into an entire different
> species? That is where my problem with the THEORY
> of evolution exists.


So you think that, if evolution is true, that one species would morph into another one. At what age would this supposedly occur? If humanity were to evolve in such a fashion, would expect them to morph at age 40?

In all seriousness, what you are implying is not what common descent suggests, which is why we don't have any fossils of a creature mid-morph.

Then again, you might be also implying what is called 'saltation', which is a genetic jump - like a mutation for a complex limb (a third arm or something), which, again, is not proposed under the modern theory of evolution.

Instead, you should expect to see gradual changes in species over time. You should expect to see ring species. You should expect to see species that exhibit transitional traits.

All of the things you should expect to find under the theory of evolution and common descent, we actually find.

Pondering Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Different, but similar species? I'm talking about
> how evolution claims that a monkey became a man.
> Two entirely different species. Not two types of
> similar squirrels. If all the claims are true,
> why do I not see any fossil or other evidence of
> say, a dog evolving into a cow. If we all came
> from slime and then evolved to a monkey and then
> to a human, there should be plenty of examples,
> yet I see none.

There are lots of examples. You just choose not to learn about them.




---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Pondering Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Different, but similar species? I'm talking about
> how evolution claims that a monkey became a man.

Humans are primates.

We see transitional fossils of this gradual change. Look at australipithicine (sp?) for instance.

> Two entirely different species. Not two types of
> similar squirrels.

?

Look up ring species. I think you are confusing taxonomic categories.

> If all the claims are true,
> why do I not see any fossil or other evidence of
> say, a dog evolving into a cow.

Dogs and cows share a common ancestor and they both presently exist. How on earth is it reasonable to expect a dog to evolve into a cow? It would be possible for a distant dog relative to have evolved into something cow-like, but your request is absurd.

> If we all came
> from slime and then evolved to a monkey and then
> to a human, there should be plenty of examples,
> yet I see none.

This isn't what natural selection, common descent, etc actually suggest. Please read up on the theory before baselessly rejecting what takes scientists years to learn.

I hope this helps.

..

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ..
>


Now, now, Numbers! Where is the evolutionists argument that Jesus was a monkey? Huh? HUH???

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm