Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: June 25, 2015 10:23AM
You lose again.
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: June 25, 2015 10:36AM
Still winning...
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
Gerry Retard
()
Date: June 25, 2015 10:39AM
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: June 25, 2015 10:40AM
New name SCOTUS Care =)
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
still winning
()
Date: June 25, 2015 11:02AM
Best news for the GOP all month!
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
Republicans = F.A.I.L.
()
Date: June 25, 2015 11:32AM
Boy, those teabaggers are really takin it on the chin lately
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
Uh ohhhh
()
Date: June 25, 2015 11:48AM
I am liberal, and have a huge problem with this. It blurs the clear line that was set between the legislative and executive branches that was set up by the founding fathers.
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: June 25, 2015 11:55AM
Uh ohhhh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am liberal, and have a huge problem with this.
> It blurs the clear line that was set between the
> legislative and executive branches that was set up
> by the founding fathers.
This had nothing to do with the executive branch. You mean the judicial branch?
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am liberal, and have a huge problem with this.
> It blurs the clear line that was set between the
> legislative and executive branches that was set up
> by the founding fathers.
This had nothing to do with the executive branch. You mean the judicial branch?
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
liberal my ass
()
Date: June 25, 2015 11:58AM
Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Uh ohhhh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I am liberal, and have a huge problem with
> this.
> > It blurs the clear line that was set between
> the
> > legislative and executive branches that was set
> up
> > by the founding fathers.
>
> This had nothing to do with the executive branch.
> You mean the judicial branch?
Some teabagger wrote that. They think everything on planet earth is somehow negatively affected by President Obama. They're just making shit up.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Uh ohhhh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I am liberal, and have a huge problem with
> this.
> > It blurs the clear line that was set between
> the
> > legislative and executive branches that was set
> up
> > by the founding fathers.
>
> This had nothing to do with the executive branch.
> You mean the judicial branch?
Some teabagger wrote that. They think everything on planet earth is somehow negatively affected by President Obama. They're just making shit up.
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
That clear line is a myth
()
Date: June 25, 2015 12:06PM
Uh ohhhh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am liberal, and have a huge problem with this.
> It blurs the clear line that was set between the
> legislative and executive branches that was set up
> by the founding fathers.
That clear line of which you write is a myth.
It has always been the job of the Executive Branch of our government to interpret the laws passed by the legislature so that they may be implemented.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am liberal, and have a huge problem with this.
> It blurs the clear line that was set between the
> legislative and executive branches that was set up
> by the founding fathers.
That clear line of which you write is a myth.
It has always been the job of the Executive Branch of our government to interpret the laws passed by the legislature so that they may be implemented.
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
HupUn
()
Date: June 25, 2015 12:49PM
Secretly the GOP wanted Obamacare upheld. It would of been a shit storm for the GOP is Obamacare was taken away from US citizens.
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
obama voter
()
Date: June 25, 2015 12:50PM
The Obama will be pleased!
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
Conserva-tards!
()
Date: June 25, 2015 12:51PM
YOU LOSE AND I WIN
I WIN FOREVER
GREAT AND MIGHTY IS MY VICTORY
Conserva-tards! lolz!
I WIN FOREVER
GREAT AND MIGHTY IS MY VICTORY
Conserva-tards! lolz!
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
you fucking liar
()
Date: June 25, 2015 01:09PM
That clear line is a myth Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It has always been the job of the Executive Branch
> of our government to interpret the laws passed by
> the legislature so that they may be implemented.
This is a flat out lie. The Judicial Branch interprets laws. The Executive Branch enforces laws.
-------------------------------------------------------
> It has always been the job of the Executive Branch
> of our government to interpret the laws passed by
> the legislature so that they may be implemented.
This is a flat out lie. The Judicial Branch interprets laws. The Executive Branch enforces laws.
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
teabagger morons
()
Date: June 25, 2015 01:43PM
you fucking liar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That clear line is a myth Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > It has always been the job of the Executive
> Branch
> > of our government to interpret the laws passed
> by
> > the legislature so that they may be
> implemented.
>
>
> This is a flat out lie. The Judicial Branch
> interprets laws. The Executive Branch enforces
> laws.
Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that the judicial branch "interprets the law".
-------------------------------------------------------
> That clear line is a myth Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > It has always been the job of the Executive
> Branch
> > of our government to interpret the laws passed
> by
> > the legislature so that they may be
> implemented.
>
>
> This is a flat out lie. The Judicial Branch
> interprets laws. The Executive Branch enforces
> laws.
Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that the judicial branch "interprets the law".
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
CEH
()
Date: June 25, 2015 02:04PM
teabagger morons Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> you fucking liar Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > That clear line is a myth Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > > It has always been the job of the Executive
> > Branch
> > > of our government to interpret the laws
> passed
> > by
> > > the legislature so that they may be
> > implemented.
> >
> >
> > This is a flat out lie. The Judicial Branch
> > interprets laws. The Executive Branch enforces
> > laws.
>
> Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that the
> judicial branch "interprets the law".
Oh really?
http://www.supremecourt.gov/about/constitutional.aspx
-------------------------------------------------------
> you fucking liar Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > That clear line is a myth Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > > It has always been the job of the Executive
> > Branch
> > > of our government to interpret the laws
> passed
> > by
> > > the legislature so that they may be
> > implemented.
> >
> >
> > This is a flat out lie. The Judicial Branch
> > interprets laws. The Executive Branch enforces
> > laws.
>
> Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that the
> judicial branch "interprets the law".
Oh really?
http://www.supremecourt.gov/about/constitutional.aspx
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
Two hundred thirty-four years
()
Date: June 25, 2015 02:20PM
teabagger morons Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that the
> judicial branch "interprets the law".
Two hundred thirty-four years of juris prudence says that you're wrong.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that the
> judicial branch "interprets the law".
Two hundred thirty-four years of juris prudence says that you're wrong.
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
CEH
()
Date: June 25, 2015 02:22PM
Two hundred thirty-four years Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> teabagger morons Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that
> the
> > judicial branch "interprets the law".
>
> Two hundred thirty-four years of juris prudence
> says that you're wrong.
Somebody didn't take middle school government.
-------------------------------------------------------
> teabagger morons Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that
> the
> > judicial branch "interprets the law".
>
> Two hundred thirty-four years of juris prudence
> says that you're wrong.
Somebody didn't take middle school government.
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
dumbass libturdz
()
Date: June 25, 2015 02:29PM
you fucking liar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That clear line is a myth Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > It has always been the job of the Executive
> Branch
> > of our government to interpret the laws passed
> by
> > the legislature so that they may be
> implemented.
>
>
> This is a flat out lie. The Judicial Branch
> interprets laws. The Executive Branch enforces
> laws.
Libs have no idea nor do they care. The executive branch with terrorist Hussein Obama has abdicated their responsibility of enforcing laws, especially their own. They are anti American traitors, like all libs.
-------------------------------------------------------
> That clear line is a myth Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > It has always been the job of the Executive
> Branch
> > of our government to interpret the laws passed
> by
> > the legislature so that they may be
> implemented.
>
>
> This is a flat out lie. The Judicial Branch
> interprets laws. The Executive Branch enforces
> laws.
Libs have no idea nor do they care. The executive branch with terrorist Hussein Obama has abdicated their responsibility of enforcing laws, especially their own. They are anti American traitors, like all libs.
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
More guidline than law
()
Date: June 25, 2015 02:30PM
CEH Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Somebody didn't take middle school government.
Somebody thinks that our government still strictly adheres to the Constitution. It doesn't.
Today, the Constitution is more like a guidline than a law.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Somebody didn't take middle school government.
Somebody thinks that our government still strictly adheres to the Constitution. It doesn't.
Today, the Constitution is more like a guidline than a law.
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
Conserva-tards!
()
Date: June 25, 2015 02:34PM
dumbass libturdz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Libs have no idea nor do they care. The executive
> branch with terrorist Hussein Obama has abdicated
> their responsibility of enforcing laws, especially
> their own. They are anti American traitors, like
> all libs.
That sucks for you, huh?
Conserva-tards!
LoLz!
-------------------------------------------------------
> Libs have no idea nor do they care. The executive
> branch with terrorist Hussein Obama has abdicated
> their responsibility of enforcing laws, especially
> their own. They are anti American traitors, like
> all libs.
That sucks for you, huh?
Conserva-tards!
LoLz!
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
jkrfrfgy
()
Date: June 25, 2015 02:44PM
Over $4,000,000,000 in subsidies being handed out.
The average cost of in-state tuition per year is $9,139
Obozo is handing out subsidies to people who refuse to achieve. Instead, we could put that money into giving free college educations to more than 437,000 people.
We'll be a country filled with "healthy", broke, uneducated liberal voters who want free shit.
GerryTard just jizzed on himself.
The average cost of in-state tuition per year is $9,139
Obozo is handing out subsidies to people who refuse to achieve. Instead, we could put that money into giving free college educations to more than 437,000 people.
We'll be a country filled with "healthy", broke, uneducated liberal voters who want free shit.
GerryTard just jizzed on himself.
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
Conserva-tards
()
Date: June 25, 2015 02:53PM
jkrfrfgy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Over $4,000,000,000 in subsidies being handed
> out.
>
> The average cost of in-state tuition per year is
> $9,139
>
> Obozo is handing out subsidies to people who
> refuse to achieve. Instead, we could put that
> money into giving free college educations to more
> than 437,000 people.
>
> We'll be a country filled with "healthy", broke,
> uneducated liberal voters who want free shit.
Try to stay lucid, my friend.
Grab a coffee, go outside for some fresh air.
You're starting to lose it.
Conserva-tards
LoLz!
-------------------------------------------------------
> Over $4,000,000,000 in subsidies being handed
> out.
>
> The average cost of in-state tuition per year is
> $9,139
>
> Obozo is handing out subsidies to people who
> refuse to achieve. Instead, we could put that
> money into giving free college educations to more
> than 437,000 people.
>
> We'll be a country filled with "healthy", broke,
> uneducated liberal voters who want free shit.
Try to stay lucid, my friend.
Grab a coffee, go outside for some fresh air.
You're starting to lose it.
Conserva-tards
LoLz!
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
in chains
()
Date: June 25, 2015 02:59PM
Conserva-tards Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> jkrfrfgy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Over $4,000,000,000 in subsidies being handed
> > out.
> >
> > The average cost of in-state tuition per year
> is
> > $9,139
> >
> > Obozo is handing out subsidies to people who
> > refuse to achieve. Instead, we could put that
> > money into giving free college educations to
> more
> > than 437,000 people.
> >
> > We'll be a country filled with "healthy",
> broke,
> > uneducated liberal voters who want free shit.
>
> Try to stay lucid, my friend.
>
> Grab a coffee, go outside for some fresh air.
>
> You're starting to lose it.
>
> Conserva-tards
>
> LoLz!
Expected Libtard response. Libs don't want people educated or to have the ability to help themselves. Libs want people in chains and dependent on the government. In chains = more votes.
-------------------------------------------------------
> jkrfrfgy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Over $4,000,000,000 in subsidies being handed
> > out.
> >
> > The average cost of in-state tuition per year
> is
> > $9,139
> >
> > Obozo is handing out subsidies to people who
> > refuse to achieve. Instead, we could put that
> > money into giving free college educations to
> more
> > than 437,000 people.
> >
> > We'll be a country filled with "healthy",
> broke,
> > uneducated liberal voters who want free shit.
>
> Try to stay lucid, my friend.
>
> Grab a coffee, go outside for some fresh air.
>
> You're starting to lose it.
>
> Conserva-tards
>
> LoLz!
Expected Libtard response. Libs don't want people educated or to have the ability to help themselves. Libs want people in chains and dependent on the government. In chains = more votes.
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
Conserva-tards!
()
Date: June 25, 2015 03:05PM
in chains Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Libs don't want people educated or to have the
> ability to help themselves.
Some people are incapable of helping themselves. Either you don't understand that or you don't care. Which is it?
Conserva-tards!
Lolz!
-------------------------------------------------------
> Libs don't want people educated or to have the
> ability to help themselves.
Some people are incapable of helping themselves. Either you don't understand that or you don't care. Which is it?
Conserva-tards!
Lolz!
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
jkefghfg
()
Date: June 25, 2015 03:21PM
Conserva-tards! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> in chains Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Libs don't want people educated or to have the
> > ability to help themselves.
>
> Some people are incapable of helping themselves.
> Either you don't understand that or you don't
> care. Which is it?
>
> Conserva-tards!
>
> Lolz!
You mean that most people made disastrous decisions their whole lives and are at a point where they can't get out. That's the reality of it. A small percentage don't have the ability to help themselves (eg disabled). But even disability is being abused.
Oh, I care. Really, I do. But I also care about my rights and how I am being forced more and more to carry the burden for those who refuse to help themselves.
-------------------------------------------------------
> in chains Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Libs don't want people educated or to have the
> > ability to help themselves.
>
> Some people are incapable of helping themselves.
> Either you don't understand that or you don't
> care. Which is it?
>
> Conserva-tards!
>
> Lolz!
You mean that most people made disastrous decisions their whole lives and are at a point where they can't get out. That's the reality of it. A small percentage don't have the ability to help themselves (eg disabled). But even disability is being abused.
Oh, I care. Really, I do. But I also care about my rights and how I am being forced more and more to carry the burden for those who refuse to help themselves.
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
Another Obama Fail
()
Date: June 25, 2015 07:35PM
The Affordable Care Act made health insurance is so affordable that people need subsidies to afford health insurance.
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
Double Action Jackson
()
Date: June 25, 2015 10:08PM
I was not happy about the decision but for the shitty reason to see Obamacare die. The reality is that millions would be out of it and the Gubment is paying the money in subsidies to insurance companies, without which premiums would skyrocket for those of us with insurance We are paying for.
Also the GOP has no plan I've seen to fix or replace this law. That is while Obama is in office. Were stuck with it for the next two.
Hopefully we will have a GOP President instead of a Old Tired Hag and another GOP majority in Nov. 2016 which I think will happen as too many main stream Americans are seeing all kinds of shit with Democrats, including the latest PC effort to get rid of the Confederate Flag and more gun control talk which is great for firearm and ammo makers.
And if it happens for the GOP in 2016, the GOP better have a replacement that works for replacing Obamacare or a adjustment or fix of Obamacare woes or else they will be packing their bags. In 18 and 20.
Now what I don't see as fair is if the Gubmnet can give certain people money away I want MINE. Hey 100 gallons of free gas a month would be fine with me.
Or a couple of slabs of USDA pork ribs, some steaks, chops.. Where's MINE
Dammit? All I do IS PAY!
Also the GOP has no plan I've seen to fix or replace this law. That is while Obama is in office. Were stuck with it for the next two.
Hopefully we will have a GOP President instead of a Old Tired Hag and another GOP majority in Nov. 2016 which I think will happen as too many main stream Americans are seeing all kinds of shit with Democrats, including the latest PC effort to get rid of the Confederate Flag and more gun control talk which is great for firearm and ammo makers.
And if it happens for the GOP in 2016, the GOP better have a replacement that works for replacing Obamacare or a adjustment or fix of Obamacare woes or else they will be packing their bags. In 18 and 20.
Now what I don't see as fair is if the Gubmnet can give certain people money away I want MINE. Hey 100 gallons of free gas a month would be fine with me.
Or a couple of slabs of USDA pork ribs, some steaks, chops.. Where's MINE
Dammit? All I do IS PAY!
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
GOP?
()
Date: June 25, 2015 10:15PM
Double Action Jackson Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And if it happens for the GOP in 2016, the GOP better have a replacement that works for replacing Obamacare or a adjustment or fix of Obamacare woes
They've had almost 8 years to do this and they didn't get it done.
-------------------------------------------------------
> And if it happens for the GOP in 2016, the GOP better have a replacement that works for replacing Obamacare or a adjustment or fix of Obamacare woes
They've had almost 8 years to do this and they didn't get it done.
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
Double Action Jackson
()
Date: June 25, 2015 10:44PM
As in why bother with Obama in office? Like he would sign off on a GOP plan. LOL. But your right as far as they better have a plan ready. A plan that will work.
Now don't ask me if Obamacare even works with its sky high deductibles. Or how any plan can avoid that.
The only thing I do know is that tort reform is sorely needed. Put a stop to the medical liability lottery game, where the biggest winners are liability lawyers that support the Democrat Party and that's why the Democrats support the way it is No Tort Reform, and don't you dare try to bullshit anyone with "No That's not the way it is".
Useless senseless medical lawsuits mean higher medical costs for everyone.
Now don't ask me if Obamacare even works with its sky high deductibles. Or how any plan can avoid that.
The only thing I do know is that tort reform is sorely needed. Put a stop to the medical liability lottery game, where the biggest winners are liability lawyers that support the Democrat Party and that's why the Democrats support the way it is No Tort Reform, and don't you dare try to bullshit anyone with "No That's not the way it is".
Useless senseless medical lawsuits mean higher medical costs for everyone.
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
jkfgurffg
()
Date: June 25, 2015 10:55PM
Here's my take (as a republican):
I know that the US medical system needed some degree of reform. Healthcare costs were (and still are) out of control. But Obamacare went in the wrong direction. Instead of cutting costs, Obamacare just raised the overall cost to the country by ensuring that everyone would have insurance. There was no attack on what the actual charges are.
I wonder why the Act didn't limit profit from medical companies and hospitals. The feds had no issue in the past with breaking up corporations who had an unfair advantage over society (MS, telecommunications, etc). Why didn't they do something to keep hospitals from ripping people off instead? Why didn't Obama go after the organizations who rip us off?
Instead of trying to tackle the real issue (costs), we were force-fed a deal that requires tax-payer money to alleviate the premiums.
Again, I know something needed to be done. My issue with the whole thing is that the wrong thing was done and pro-Obama people want to stand by a bad decision.
Not a bash...just a well-informed opinion.
I know that the US medical system needed some degree of reform. Healthcare costs were (and still are) out of control. But Obamacare went in the wrong direction. Instead of cutting costs, Obamacare just raised the overall cost to the country by ensuring that everyone would have insurance. There was no attack on what the actual charges are.
I wonder why the Act didn't limit profit from medical companies and hospitals. The feds had no issue in the past with breaking up corporations who had an unfair advantage over society (MS, telecommunications, etc). Why didn't they do something to keep hospitals from ripping people off instead? Why didn't Obama go after the organizations who rip us off?
Instead of trying to tackle the real issue (costs), we were force-fed a deal that requires tax-payer money to alleviate the premiums.
Again, I know something needed to be done. My issue with the whole thing is that the wrong thing was done and pro-Obama people want to stand by a bad decision.
Not a bash...just a well-informed opinion.
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
causeican
()
Date: June 25, 2015 11:14PM
dumbass libturdz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> you fucking liar Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > That clear line is a myth Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > > It has always been the job of the Executive
> > Branch
> > > of our government to interpret the laws
> passed
> > by
> > > the legislature so that they may be
> > implemented.
> >
> >
> > This is a flat out lie. The Judicial Branch
> > interprets laws. The Executive Branch enforces
> > laws.
>
>
> Libs have no idea nor do they care. The executive
> branch with terrorist Hussein Obama has abdicated
> their responsibility of enforcing laws, especially
> their own. They are anti American traitors, like
> all libs.
+1
-------------------------------------------------------
> you fucking liar Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > That clear line is a myth Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > > It has always been the job of the Executive
> > Branch
> > > of our government to interpret the laws
> passed
> > by
> > > the legislature so that they may be
> > implemented.
> >
> >
> > This is a flat out lie. The Judicial Branch
> > interprets laws. The Executive Branch enforces
> > laws.
>
>
> Libs have no idea nor do they care. The executive
> branch with terrorist Hussein Obama has abdicated
> their responsibility of enforcing laws, especially
> their own. They are anti American traitors, like
> all libs.
+1
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
Double Action Jackson
()
Date: June 25, 2015 11:17PM
There's no Tort Reform in Obamacare and that leads to huge excessive costs and huge profits too for liability lawyers and the players in the "Medical Lottery Liability" game.
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
xLU9U
()
Date: June 25, 2015 11:18PM
Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You lose again.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plessy_v._Ferguson
-------------------------------------------------------
> You lose again.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plessy_v._Ferguson
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
PKT6y
()
Date: June 25, 2015 11:19PM
xLU9U Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You lose again.
>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plessy_v._Ferguson
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You lose again.
>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plessy_v._Ferguson
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
DKnCP
()
Date: June 25, 2015 11:20PM
PKT6y Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> xLU9U Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > You lose again.
> >
> >
> >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plessy_v._Ferguson
>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandfo
> rd
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pace_v._Alabama
-------------------------------------------------------
> xLU9U Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > You lose again.
> >
> >
> >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plessy_v._Ferguson
>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandfo
> rd
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pace_v._Alabama
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
jY7pE
()
Date: June 25, 2015 11:21PM
DKnCP Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> PKT6y Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > xLU9U Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > You lose again.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plessy_v._Ferguson
> >
> >
> >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandfo
>
> > rd
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pace_v._Alabama
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korematsu_v._United_States
-------------------------------------------------------
> PKT6y Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > xLU9U Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > You lose again.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plessy_v._Ferguson
> >
> >
> >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandfo
>
> > rd
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pace_v._Alabama
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korematsu_v._United_States
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
YV3ww
()
Date: June 25, 2015 11:21PM
> >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plessy_v._Ferguson
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandfo
>
> >
> > > rd
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pace_v._Alabama
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korematsu_v._United_
> States
A long history of getting it wrong.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plessy_v._Ferguson
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandfo
>
> >
> > > rd
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pace_v._Alabama
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korematsu_v._United_
> States
A long history of getting it wrong.
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
affordable?
()
Date: June 25, 2015 11:25PM
jkfgurffg Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Here's my take (as a republican):
>
> I know that the US medical system needed some
> degree of reform. Healthcare costs were (and still
> are) out of control. But Obamacare went in the
> wrong direction. Instead of cutting costs,
> Obamacare just raised the overall cost to the
> country by ensuring that everyone would have
> insurance. There was no attack on what the actual
> charges are.
>
> I wonder why the Act didn't limit profit from
> medical companies and hospitals. The feds had no
> issue in the past with breaking up corporations
> who had an unfair advantage over society (MS,
> telecommunications, etc). Why didn't they do
> something to keep hospitals from ripping people
> off instead? Why didn't Obama go after the
> organizations who rip us off?
>
> Instead of trying to tackle the real issue
> (costs), we were force-fed a deal that requires
> tax-payer money to alleviate the premiums.
>
> Again, I know something needed to be done. My
> issue with the whole thing is that the wrong thing
> was done and pro-Obama people want to stand by a
> bad decision.
>
> Not a bash...just a well-informed opinion.
At a congressional hearing on Wednesday, saying “premiums are going up” and explaining how the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) has proposed premium hikes of 10 percent or more in 2016.
“But look at the facts: premiums are going up. Emergency room use is rising. Co-ops are failing. There’s certainly a wave of evidence, and it’s definitely pointing to one clear conclusion: Obamacare is not working," said Roskam at the House Ways and Means Committee hearing on “Rising Health Insurance Premiums Under Obamacare.”
Health insurance experts are predicting that premiums will rise more significantly in 2016 than in the first two years of Obamacare exchange coverage. In 2015, for example, premiums increased by an average of 5.4 percent, according to PwC’s Health Research Institute.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Here's my take (as a republican):
>
> I know that the US medical system needed some
> degree of reform. Healthcare costs were (and still
> are) out of control. But Obamacare went in the
> wrong direction. Instead of cutting costs,
> Obamacare just raised the overall cost to the
> country by ensuring that everyone would have
> insurance. There was no attack on what the actual
> charges are.
>
> I wonder why the Act didn't limit profit from
> medical companies and hospitals. The feds had no
> issue in the past with breaking up corporations
> who had an unfair advantage over society (MS,
> telecommunications, etc). Why didn't they do
> something to keep hospitals from ripping people
> off instead? Why didn't Obama go after the
> organizations who rip us off?
>
> Instead of trying to tackle the real issue
> (costs), we were force-fed a deal that requires
> tax-payer money to alleviate the premiums.
>
> Again, I know something needed to be done. My
> issue with the whole thing is that the wrong thing
> was done and pro-Obama people want to stand by a
> bad decision.
>
> Not a bash...just a well-informed opinion.
At a congressional hearing on Wednesday, saying “premiums are going up” and explaining how the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) has proposed premium hikes of 10 percent or more in 2016.
“But look at the facts: premiums are going up. Emergency room use is rising. Co-ops are failing. There’s certainly a wave of evidence, and it’s definitely pointing to one clear conclusion: Obamacare is not working," said Roskam at the House Ways and Means Committee hearing on “Rising Health Insurance Premiums Under Obamacare.”
Health insurance experts are predicting that premiums will rise more significantly in 2016 than in the first two years of Obamacare exchange coverage. In 2015, for example, premiums increased by an average of 5.4 percent, according to PwC’s Health Research Institute.
Re: Supreme Court upholds Obama Care
Posted by:
Gerry is dead
()
Date: June 25, 2015 11:30PM
Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You lose again.
No, we ALL lose.
-------------------------------------------------------
> You lose again.
No, we ALL lose.