Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
eesh Wrote:
+
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
july 10th?
()
Date: June 12, 2015 11:50PM
Hehhh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Remember folks, this is coming from the guy who
> has never once ever lied here or in court and is
> always right and never wrong about anything;
> especially when it comes to how the law works and court!
you mean like how his demurrer was for today but now it's suddenly july 10th?
isnt july 10th the same date as lizzie's updated protective order hearing against him?
what's going on here?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Remember folks, this is coming from the guy who
> has never once ever lied here or in court and is
> always right and never wrong about anything;
> especially when it comes to how the law works and court!
you mean like how his demurrer was for today but now it's suddenly july 10th?
isnt july 10th the same date as lizzie's updated protective order hearing against him?
what's going on here?
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
plopl
()
Date: June 12, 2015 11:51PM
Money Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hates himself. Self loathing LOL Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Jealousy. Envy. He hates anyone who has
> anything
> > that he doesn't.
> >
> > Money, friends, money, family, money, people
> who
> > care about him, money, significant others,
> money,
> > money, a life, money, anything other than this
> > website, money, stuff to do, money, nicer cars,
> > money, nicer homes, money, live in nicer
> > neighborhoods, money, a penis larger than a pinkie toe,
> > money, anyone that's sane, money, anything lean,
> > money
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hates himself. Self loathing LOL Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Jealousy. Envy. He hates anyone who has
> anything
> > that he doesn't.
> >
> > Money, friends, money, family, money, people
> who
> > care about him, money, significant others,
> money,
> > money, a life, money, anything other than this
> > website, money, stuff to do, money, nicer cars,
> > money, nicer homes, money, live in nicer
> > neighborhoods, money, a penis larger than a pinkie toe,
> > money, anyone that's sane, money, anything lean,
> > money
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
LULZ @ $10,000 per device! LOL!!!
()
Date: June 13, 2015 12:03AM
Niggggaaaa this shit is funnnnnnny!! Woooo!
Don't question anything. Everything he says is true, right and he's never wrong and never lies.
Don't question anything. Everything he says is true, right and he's never wrong and never lies.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: June 13, 2015 12:03AM
july 10th? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hehhh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Remember folks, this is coming from the guy who
> > has never once ever lied here or in court and
> is
> > always right and never wrong about anything;
> > especially when it comes to how the law works
> and court!
>
> you mean like how his demurrer was for today but
> now it's suddenly july 10th?
>
> isnt july 10th the same date as lizzie's updated
> protective order hearing against him?
>
> what's going on here?
Isn't that convenient? Speaking of which, I need to turn on my scanner.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hehhh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Remember folks, this is coming from the guy who
> > has never once ever lied here or in court and
> is
> > always right and never wrong about anything;
> > especially when it comes to how the law works
> and court!
>
> you mean like how his demurrer was for today but
> now it's suddenly july 10th?
>
> isnt july 10th the same date as lizzie's updated
> protective order hearing against him?
>
> what's going on here?
Isn't that convenient? Speaking of which, I need to turn on my scanner.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
The most sarcastic post ever....
()
Date: June 13, 2015 12:05AM
july 10th? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> you mean like how his demurrer was for today but
> now it's suddenly july 10th?
>
> isnt july 10th the same date as lizzie's updated
> protective order hearing against him?
>
> what's going on here?
Obviously there is no protective order and he was right. He couldn't possibly be at two different court hearings at once. He was never served. It was all fake and lies and she typed it up herself. You could tell it wasn't real by the font, the format and the official court document evidence being in the wrong place. Clearly one of her many friends at the court stole that stamp for her and stamped it. So that's the end of that discussion.
-------------------------------------------------------
> you mean like how his demurrer was for today but
> now it's suddenly july 10th?
>
> isnt july 10th the same date as lizzie's updated
> protective order hearing against him?
>
> what's going on here?
Obviously there is no protective order and he was right. He couldn't possibly be at two different court hearings at once. He was never served. It was all fake and lies and she typed it up herself. You could tell it wasn't real by the font, the format and the official court document evidence being in the wrong place. Clearly one of her many friends at the court stole that stamp for her and stamped it. So that's the end of that discussion.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
XE9C4
()
Date: June 13, 2015 12:17AM
I am on the edge of my seat!
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
xEdN4
()
Date: June 13, 2015 12:29AM
Re: eesh's popularity is at an all time low
Posted by: Never forget who said it lol ()
Date: June 13, 2015 12:27AM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> With who?
>> everyone saw the protective order she has against you for 5th june
> You mean the protective order that Monique Wells
> typed up herself? You can print off the forms on
> the court website. LOL at courtroom 1D. Court
> rooms aren't decided two weeks in advance.
Posted by: Never forget who said it lol ()
Date: June 13, 2015 12:27AM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> With who?
>> everyone saw the protective order she has against you for 5th june
> You mean the protective order that Monique Wells
> typed up herself? You can print off the forms on
> the court website. LOL at courtroom 1D. Court
> rooms aren't decided two weeks in advance.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
DmwtN
()
Date: June 13, 2015 12:30AM
Re: I TOLD YOU FUCKS! EESH WINS AGAIN
Posted by: Remember he said it himself lol ()
Date: June 13, 2015 12:25AM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There is no protective order.
Posted by: Remember he said it himself lol ()
Date: June 13, 2015 12:25AM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There is no protective order.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
TYeFW
()
Date: June 13, 2015 12:30AM
Re: Lizzie vs Eesh court date tomorrow
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: June 04, 2015 07:24PM
eesh so crushed by lizzy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> we saw the pro order in the other thread that was
> obtained on the 20th and many ppl called and know
> you were served the 22nd
You mean the protective order that was printed off with the wrong font and the stamp in the wrong place? Ok
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: June 04, 2015 07:24PM
eesh so crushed by lizzy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> we saw the pro order in the other thread that was
> obtained on the 20th and many ppl called and know
> you were served the 22nd
You mean the protective order that was printed off with the wrong font and the stamp in the wrong place? Ok
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Ejpxt
()
Date: June 13, 2015 12:31AM
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: June 05, 2015 01:55PM
No. There is no hearing, it's just lizzie and her fake preliminary protective order that she printed out at home.
Date: June 05, 2015 01:55PM
No. There is no hearing, it's just lizzie and her fake preliminary protective order that she printed out at home.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
UUTMv
()
Date: June 13, 2015 12:32AM
Re: How did the Michael Basl protective order hearing go?
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: June 05, 2015 03:14PM
Monique, have you printed off another fake protective order yet?
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: June 05, 2015 03:14PM
Monique, have you printed off another fake protective order yet?
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
GPbpy
()
Date: June 13, 2015 12:33AM
Re: How did the Michael Basl protective order hearing go?
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: June 05, 2015 03:34PM
There is no protective order in place, it's just more garbage from "Team Miz."
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: June 05, 2015 03:34PM
There is no protective order in place, it's just more garbage from "Team Miz."
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
mD7Eh
()
Date: June 13, 2015 12:34AM
Re: Michael Josef Basl's harassment and stalking of 14 year old Tj Sadler
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: June 07, 2015 10:40PM
Dodging the protective order? lmao
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: June 07, 2015 10:40PM
Dodging the protective order? lmao
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Jm9XK
()
Date: June 13, 2015 12:36AM
Re: Eesh being served ANOTHER protective order!?
Posted by: ducks in a row ()
Date: May 24, 2015 12:58AM
some more info Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This story checks out. Just call 804-501-4797 and
> ask if there's a protective order issued and give
> the name. They said yes and that one was just
> served on the 13th as well.
haha .. so i called and they asked for his social security number .. told them to hold on .. i had to find the thread where he first posted his own social security number lol .. but yes this is real .. the chickens are coming home to roost or is it roast ?
Posted by: ducks in a row ()
Date: May 24, 2015 12:58AM
some more info Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This story checks out. Just call 804-501-4797 and
> ask if there's a protective order issued and give
> the name. They said yes and that one was just
> served on the 13th as well.
haha .. so i called and they asked for his social security number .. told them to hold on .. i had to find the thread where he first posted his own social security number lol .. but yes this is real .. the chickens are coming home to roost or is it roast ?
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
kUPJp
()
Date: June 13, 2015 12:36AM
Re: Michael Josef Basl "eesh" due in Fairfax General District Court
Posted by: some more info ()
Date: May 24, 2015 12:21AM
Fuck you never mind I found it on my own and this story checks out. Just call 804-501-4797 and ask if there's a protective order issued and give the name. They said yes and that one was just served May 13 too lol..
Posted by: some more info ()
Date: May 24, 2015 12:21AM
Fuck you never mind I found it on my own and this story checks out. Just call 804-501-4797 and ask if there's a protective order issued and give the name. They said yes and that one was just served May 13 too lol..
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
So I see...
()
Date: June 13, 2015 12:39AM
So it appears that the respondent was very much aware that there was a protective order and was given ample notice and even a number to call to see if there was one. There is also proof that he in fact did witness the protective order himself as he noted "the stamp and dates"
Respondent could have easily called the number to see if a protective order was pending service. Clearly respondent knew as other people had mentioned it, supplied the number and the order was shown to him.
Respondent purposely evaded service of protective order.
Respondent could have easily called the number to see if a protective order was pending service. Clearly respondent knew as other people had mentioned it, supplied the number and the order was shown to him.
Respondent purposely evaded service of protective order.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
guy from internet
()
Date: June 13, 2015 12:41AM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> -**-*-*-
"guy from internet" is the funniest part
-------------------------------------------------------
> -**-*-*-
"guy from internet" is the funniest part
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Still not understanding
()
Date: June 13, 2015 12:43AM
lol I'm wondering what was supposed to be so "bizarre" about any of that? All that is written is everything we all already know has happened and seen on this site for ourselves. But I thought there was no protective order?!
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
1D
()
Date: June 13, 2015 12:45AM
oh nigga you done goof'd he even put that he knew what court room it was supposed to be in
why oh why does he do these stupid things? we have just witnessed another failed on his part
why oh why does he do these stupid things? we have just witnessed another failed on his part
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: June 13, 2015 12:51AM
What's odd is the the petitioner turned against me on Easter morning, I remember that day very well. She blames me for some white paint on the hood of the six door truck, of course in the petitioner's mind I am the only possible person on the planet that could have done this.
Three hours after she accused me of doing this, she was shooting off emails to various people about some delusional conspiracy involving death threats and Tor.
The thing is, the mother was already typing this bizarre letter up on the 23rd of March, so they had been planning this for a while. I wonder how long it took her to come up with this story involving Tor and death threats.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/13/2015 12:51AM by eesh.
Three hours after she accused me of doing this, she was shooting off emails to various people about some delusional conspiracy involving death threats and Tor.
The thing is, the mother was already typing this bizarre letter up on the 23rd of March, so they had been planning this for a while. I wonder how long it took her to come up with this story involving Tor and death threats.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/13/2015 12:51AM by eesh.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Uh huhhh
()
Date: June 13, 2015 12:53AM
Or quite possibly she went and edited the letter after the paint incident. Original copies of said letter do exist elsewhere. Oops, so sad! :,(
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
KpkxG
()
Date: June 13, 2015 12:54AM
Uh huhhh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Or quite possibly she went and edited the letter
> after the paint incident. Original copies of said
> letter do exist elsewhere. Oops, so sad! :,(
haha dumbass
-------------------------------------------------------
> Or quite possibly she went and edited the letter
> after the paint incident. Original copies of said
> letter do exist elsewhere. Oops, so sad! :,(
haha dumbass
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Hubcaps
()
Date: June 13, 2015 12:57AM
Right..they decided "let's go damage our own truck and blame it on eesh for some odd reason"
Sorry. The only person who commits crimes to themselves and blames others is the person who had their criminal case against someone for computer harassment thrown out. Not everyone is a psychotic lunatic.
I'd also like to hear about the missing hub caps that both Lizzie and Misery experienced..
Sorry. The only person who commits crimes to themselves and blames others is the person who had their criminal case against someone for computer harassment thrown out. Not everyone is a psychotic lunatic.
I'd also like to hear about the missing hub caps that both Lizzie and Misery experienced..
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Ugly Nigger
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:02AM
Uh huhhh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Or quite possibly she went and edited the letter
> after the paint incident. Original copies of said
> letter do exist elsewhere.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Or quite possibly she went and edited the letter
> after the paint incident. Original copies of said
> letter do exist elsewhere.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Greek Towtruck Driver
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:03AM
I always though Frisky was the sign/hubcap thief. Seems more his MO.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
noticed that too
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:03AM
guy from internet Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > -**-*-*-
>
>
> "guy from internet" is the funniest part
I was wondering about that. They had known each other for over two years. They were on very friendly and intimate terms not long ago, and were even stalking other people together.
She should have checked either "Someone you have dated" or "Friend or ex-friend".
Yet she signed under penalty of perjury, so clearly she perjured herself on the form.
{I'm not on either team, just an observer)
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > -**-*-*-
>
>
> "guy from internet" is the funniest part
I was wondering about that. They had known each other for over two years. They were on very friendly and intimate terms not long ago, and were even stalking other people together.
She should have checked either "Someone you have dated" or "Friend or ex-friend".
Yet she signed under penalty of perjury, so clearly she perjured herself on the form.
{I'm not on either team, just an observer)
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
lol @ perjured
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:05AM
noticed that too Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> guy from internet Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > eesh Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > -**-*-*-
> >
> >
> > "guy from internet" is the funniest part
>
>
> I was wondering about that. They had known each
> other for over two years. They were on very
> friendly and intimate terms not long ago, and were
> even stalking other people together.
>
> She should have checked either "Someone you have
> dated" or "Friend or ex-friend".
>
> Yet she signed under penalty of perjury, so
> clearly she perjured herself on the form.
>
> {I'm not on either team, just an observer)
LOL @ that! Perjured? Really? It says casual. You can't determine whether or not someone was "friends" with anyone and intimate? Ew! Hahaha!
-------------------------------------------------------
> guy from internet Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > eesh Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > -**-*-*-
> >
> >
> > "guy from internet" is the funniest part
>
>
> I was wondering about that. They had known each
> other for over two years. They were on very
> friendly and intimate terms not long ago, and were
> even stalking other people together.
>
> She should have checked either "Someone you have
> dated" or "Friend or ex-friend".
>
> Yet she signed under penalty of perjury, so
> clearly she perjured herself on the form.
>
> {I'm not on either team, just an observer)
LOL @ that! Perjured? Really? It says casual. You can't determine whether or not someone was "friends" with anyone and intimate? Ew! Hahaha!
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
pretty casual
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:06AM
did you forget they only met up three times?
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:06AM
They blamed Ding an sich for the initial vandalism....something about a spoiler.
They blamed frisky for the street sign placed in front of their truck.
They blamed me for the missing hubcaps, then when the petitioner and myself met in early March, she told me she knew it wasn't me.
Now, we're back to blaming me for the missing hubcaps, and hell, throw in the other vandalism as well.
The missing piece out of all this is that there is a bus stop literally in front of their home. They have no privacy; people gather in front of their home all day to catch the bus. Any number of people could have done this, but rational thinking seems to escape them.
They blamed frisky for the street sign placed in front of their truck.
They blamed me for the missing hubcaps, then when the petitioner and myself met in early March, she told me she knew it wasn't me.
Now, we're back to blaming me for the missing hubcaps, and hell, throw in the other vandalism as well.
The missing piece out of all this is that there is a bus stop literally in front of their home. They have no privacy; people gather in front of their home all day to catch the bus. Any number of people could have done this, but rational thinking seems to escape them.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Jailbirddd
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:07AM
Greek Towtruck Driver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I always though Frisky was the sign/hubcap thief.
> Seems more his MO.
Why would frisky take Misery's hubcap?
And frisky was in jail when that happened.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I always though Frisky was the sign/hubcap thief.
> Seems more his MO.
Why would frisky take Misery's hubcap?
And frisky was in jail when that happened.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Bus stops
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:08AM
I wonder if Misery has a bus stop in front of his house..
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:08AM
noticed that too Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> guy from internet Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > eesh Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > -**-*-*-
> >
> >
> > "guy from internet" is the funniest part
>
>
> I was wondering about that. They had known each
> other for over two years. They were on very
> friendly and intimate terms not long ago, and were
> even stalking other people together.
>
> She should have checked either "Someone you have
> dated" or "Friend or ex-friend".
>
> Yet she signed under penalty of perjury, so
> clearly she perjured herself on the form.
>
> {I'm not on either team, just an observer)
The petitioner also used a vibrator while we talked on the phone. She also sent me a pic of her wearing a purple strap on, I didn't save the pic.
-------------------------------------------------------
> guy from internet Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > eesh Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > -**-*-*-
> >
> >
> > "guy from internet" is the funniest part
>
>
> I was wondering about that. They had known each
> other for over two years. They were on very
> friendly and intimate terms not long ago, and were
> even stalking other people together.
>
> She should have checked either "Someone you have
> dated" or "Friend or ex-friend".
>
> Yet she signed under penalty of perjury, so
> clearly she perjured herself on the form.
>
> {I'm not on either team, just an observer)
The petitioner also used a vibrator while we talked on the phone. She also sent me a pic of her wearing a purple strap on, I didn't save the pic.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
YE7hW
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:09AM
Of course it's not rational to think that the same random weird crime happens to two people who one person had a personal grudge against to not suspect the people at the bus stop!
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
lol @ the lies
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:10AM
Petitioner doesn't own any purple strap ons
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
DMbVG
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:12AM
She should have checked either "Someone you have dated" or "Friend or ex-friend".
Except they never dated and were never friends?
Except they never dated and were never friends?
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Easter
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:13AM
Easter...wasn't Easter around the time eesh said Caan swatted him?
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Mr. Hoopers Store
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:14AM
I don't know who's written complaint is funnier to look at; mo's or meg's.
I guess no one told them how to get to Sesame Street.
I guess no one told them how to get to Sesame Street.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
UUEN9
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:15AM
wasn't easter when eesh said lizzie asked for his phone number and she said he didn't want to give it to her?
how were they talking on the phone if she didn't have his number?
and why didn't he want to give her his number on easter?
was this before or after he "knew" about the paint?
how were they talking on the phone if she didn't have his number?
and why didn't he want to give her his number on easter?
was this before or after he "knew" about the paint?
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
funniest criminal complaint ever
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:16AM
Mr. Hoopers Store Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don't know who's written complaint is funnier to
> look at; mo's or meg's.
> I guess no one told them how to get to Sesame
> Street.
eesh's
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.php?40,file=189902,filename=image.jpg
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don't know who's written complaint is funnier to
> look at; mo's or meg's.
> I guess no one told them how to get to Sesame
> Street.
eesh's
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.php?40,file=189902,filename=image.jpg
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:17AM
Petitioner owns purple strap on and wears it, saw pic with EXIF data.
Petitioner offered to give me a hand job in exchange for taking her to Genghis Grill; I declined and then she offered me a footsie.
Petitioner used vibrator while we talked on phone, it was very noisy.
Petitioner offered to give me a hand job in exchange for taking her to Genghis Grill; I declined and then she offered me a footsie.
Petitioner used vibrator while we talked on phone, it was very noisy.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
D6c6p
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:17AM
YE7hW Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Of course it's not rational to think that the same
> random weird crime happens to two people who one
> person had a personal grudge against to not
> suspect the people at the bus stop!
LOL
-------------------------------------------------------
> Of course it's not rational to think that the same
> random weird crime happens to two people who one
> person had a personal grudge against to not
> suspect the people at the bus stop!
LOL
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Everyone believe the truthteller
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:18AM
LOOOOOL
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Darth Scumbag
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:22AM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Petitioner used vibrator while we talked on phone,
> it was very noisy.
Was the vibrator itself noisy, or was there an echo?
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Petitioner used vibrator while we talked on phone,
> it was very noisy.
Was the vibrator itself noisy, or was there an echo?
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
TXh4b
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:23AM
Just wondering what use people who ride the bus would have for hubcaps...
That rational thinking yall!
That rational thinking yall!
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Hehhh
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:25AM
Soooo is there a bus stop in front of Misery's house? Or is it in a cult-de-sac.
I wonder what the excuse for that is.
It's also strange that both people had just one hubcap left. Just one. Both people. Stalked and harassed by the same person.
Didn't even know the hubcap thing had happens to both of them until the lawsuit was posted!
What are the odds?!
Of course, the people at the bus stop traveled all the way from Fairfax to Sterling and into the cult-de-sac to steal his hubcaps and leave just one too!
Yeah buddy! So rational, lmao Jesus Christ
I wonder what the excuse for that is.
It's also strange that both people had just one hubcap left. Just one. Both people. Stalked and harassed by the same person.
Didn't even know the hubcap thing had happens to both of them until the lawsuit was posted!
What are the odds?!
Of course, the people at the bus stop traveled all the way from Fairfax to Sterling and into the cult-de-sac to steal his hubcaps and leave just one too!
Yeah buddy! So rational, lmao Jesus Christ
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:28AM
Darth Scumbag Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> >
> > Petitioner used vibrator while we talked on
> phone,
> > it was very noisy.
>
>
> Was the vibrator itself noisy, or was there an
> echo?
It was very noisy. A loud buzzing mixed with her moans, it was an unusual experience on the phone.
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> >
> > Petitioner used vibrator while we talked on
> phone,
> > it was very noisy.
>
>
> Was the vibrator itself noisy, or was there an
> echo?
It was very noisy. A loud buzzing mixed with her moans, it was an unusual experience on the phone.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
pTTWU
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:28AM
And oh my goodness. It's so not rational to think that the one person who was so obsessed with a truck that had never been messed with for the 17 years that the owners had it until one person discovered its location, posted its location and posted several times about how he hopes some sort of damage would happen to the truck - would actually do something to the truck.
Not to mention literally a day or two after this person discorved the truck's location was something in fact done to it.
So irrational.
Not to mention literally a day or two after this person discorved the truck's location was something in fact done to it.
So irrational.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
LeUTU
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:29AM
Lets go dig up those truck posts shall we?
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
One post
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:31AM
Re: Why is lizzie ruling?
Posted by: eesh()
Date: March 10, 2012 02:07AM
lizzie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don't see how that shows anything but nothing
> you say holds any value anyway
So what would you do if that truck was destroyed, or bought by someone else? After all, the title is in your neighbor's name.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you hit post message, ask yourself, "Does this post benefit the website?"
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/10/2012 02:07AM by eesh.
Posted by: eesh()
Date: March 10, 2012 02:07AM
lizzie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don't see how that shows anything but nothing
> you say holds any value anyway
So what would you do if that truck was destroyed, or bought by someone else? After all, the title is in your neighbor's name.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you hit post message, ask yourself, "Does this post benefit the website?"
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/10/2012 02:07AM by eesh.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
hhJbt
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:31AM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Petitioner owns purple strap on and wears it, saw
> pic with EXIF data.
>
>
> Petitioner offered to give me a hand job in
> exchange for taking her to Genghis Grill; I
> declined and then she offered me a footsie.
>
>
> Petitioner used vibrator while we talked on phone,
> it was very noisy.
And her claim to fame will be getting a piece of paper saying "stay away from me.
stalked with eesh
phone sex with eesh
I hope eesh brings this all up in court, that would be hilarious.
Question for eesh - you plan on giving them all your computer stuff? What? Yeah, I figured you are not that dumb.
and the shit says "respondent was not served so it is moved to..6 months..."
-------------------------------------------------------
> Petitioner owns purple strap on and wears it, saw
> pic with EXIF data.
>
>
> Petitioner offered to give me a hand job in
> exchange for taking her to Genghis Grill; I
> declined and then she offered me a footsie.
>
>
> Petitioner used vibrator while we talked on phone,
> it was very noisy.
And her claim to fame will be getting a piece of paper saying "stay away from me.
stalked with eesh
phone sex with eesh
I hope eesh brings this all up in court, that would be hilarious.
Question for eesh - you plan on giving them all your computer stuff? What? Yeah, I figured you are not that dumb.
and the shit says "respondent was not served so it is moved to..6 months..."
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Two post
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:31AM
Re: Why is lizzie ruling?
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: March 10, 2012 02:09AM
lizzie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> They aren't going to sell it to anyone but my
> family. Get that through your fatass curly haired
> fat barbie head!
And what would you do if the truck was stolen, or caught on fire?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you hit post message, ask yourself, "Does this post benefit the website?"
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: March 10, 2012 02:09AM
lizzie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> They aren't going to sell it to anyone but my
> family. Get that through your fatass curly haired
> fat barbie head!
And what would you do if the truck was stolen, or caught on fire?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you hit post message, ask yourself, "Does this post benefit the website?"
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Three post
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:32AM
Re: Why is lizzie ruling?
Posted by: the grammar police ()
Date: March 12, 2012 03:28PM
LOL did eesh actually torch a truck? Is it bad that I believe this so easily?
Posted by: the grammar police ()
Date: March 12, 2012 03:28PM
LOL did eesh actually torch a truck? Is it bad that I believe this so easily?
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Four
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:33AM
Date: March 25, 2015 11:49PM
Re: Murder plot
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: April 06, 2012 01:07AM
lizzie is poor, her father couldn't even pay for that six-door truck that Harry Tuttle vandalized last month.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you hit post message, ask yourself, "Does this post benefit the website?"
Re: Murder plot
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: April 06, 2012 01:07AM
lizzie is poor, her father couldn't even pay for that six-door truck that Harry Tuttle vandalized last month.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you hit post message, ask yourself, "Does this post benefit the website?"
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Five
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:33AM
Re: does anyone think....
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: October 29, 2012 05:44PM
If anything, maybe a huge tree will crash down on that six door truck that lizzie adores so much. I doubt they have much insurance on the truck or home.....
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: October 29, 2012 05:44PM
If anything, maybe a huge tree will crash down on that six door truck that lizzie adores so much. I doubt they have much insurance on the truck or home.....
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Six
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:33AM
Re: lizzie gets butthurt
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: January 21, 2013 01:43PM
Wow. She really believed Ding an Sich (the person referenced in that cardboard sign) vandalized her precious six door truck.
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: January 21, 2013 01:43PM
Wow. She really believed Ding an Sich (the person referenced in that cardboard sign) vandalized her precious six door truck.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:35AM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> It was very noisy. A loud buzzing mixed with her
> moans, it was an unusual experience on the phone.
+Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
97yMX
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:38AM
none of the posts prove shit dumb cunt
fuck, you are a dense hoodrat
in the REAL WORLD playing connect the dots with posts on a message board do not equal shit
have proof eesh did anything to your truck? WELL GO SHOW THE POLICE OR STFU, because you are just looking like an idiot
Here you go - I vandalized the truck and stole the street signs ........ and, now what?
fuck, you are a dense hoodrat
in the REAL WORLD playing connect the dots with posts on a message board do not equal shit
have proof eesh did anything to your truck? WELL GO SHOW THE POLICE OR STFU, because you are just looking like an idiot
Here you go - I vandalized the truck and stole the street signs ........ and, now what?
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
jTwU3
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:39AM
eesh Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------
> The six door truck was parked underneath an
> electrical box with this green light, the license
> plate # is Virginia TU 51-293. The registration
> expires November 2012.
------------------------------------------------------
> The six door truck was parked underneath an
> electrical box with this green light, the license
> plate # is Virginia TU 51-293. The registration
> expires November 2012.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
7Dw4E
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:43AM
jTwU3 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> ----
> > The six door truck was parked underneath an
> > electrical box with this green light, the
> license
> > plate # is Virginia TU 51-293. The registration
> > expires November 2012.
^^^^^^^more signs eesh is winning bigtime
having her run all over trying to prove something no one gives a fuck about
all while laughing that she had phone sex with eesh LOL
my favorite part of this is.........eesh is STRAIGHT UP POSTING AROUND THAT SHIT
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> ----
> > The six door truck was parked underneath an
> > electrical box with this green light, the
> license
> > plate # is Virginia TU 51-293. The registration
> > expires November 2012.
^^^^^^^more signs eesh is winning bigtime
having her run all over trying to prove something no one gives a fuck about
all while laughing that she had phone sex with eesh LOL
my favorite part of this is.........eesh is STRAIGHT UP POSTING AROUND THAT SHIT
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Mmhmmm
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:47AM
Uh huhhh
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Riiiight
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:49AM
Because everyone believes phone sex happened because everything eesh says is true. Yet there's no proof of this and he never lies..
and lol @ bring that up in court. And that's supposed to do what? People have brought protective orders against people who have actually HAD SEX with each other. It's time to stop being a retard and go find a life of your own now.
You think you know things but you really have no idea.
There's a really huge chunk of this missing.
Do you really think this was enough to grant a protective order without a warrant or arrest first? You should probably look into that
and lol @ bring that up in court. And that's supposed to do what? People have brought protective orders against people who have actually HAD SEX with each other. It's time to stop being a retard and go find a life of your own now.
You think you know things but you really have no idea.
There's a really huge chunk of this missing.
Do you really think this was enough to grant a protective order without a warrant or arrest first? You should probably look into that
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
S E X S E X S E X X X X X X X X
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:52AM
https://www.dcjs.virginia.gov/victims/documents/poStalking.pdf
I'm off to have actual sex with my boyfriend now! We'll post pics of us holding hands together later! ;)
Goodnight!
I'm off to have actual sex with my boyfriend now! We'll post pics of us holding hands together later! ;)
Goodnight!
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
HUMINT confirmed with IMINT
()
Date: June 13, 2015 01:59AM
Black slacks, polka dot shirt, red sneakers.
Bald scrawny guy and morbidly obese woman. Bald scrawny guy and morbidly obese woman are same height. Morbidly obese woman has fugitive photo that lists her height as 5'4.
Bald scrawny guy follows around morbidly obese woman and carries her huge bag.
Morbidly obese woman has hair in some sort of bouffant.
Black slacks, polka dot shirt, red sneakers seen walking with two very rotund people. Two rotund people appear to be related, both very obese and socially awkward.
"Two rotund people" confused intelligence analysis until further investigation revealed it to be lawsuit plaintiff and his disgusting sister.
Have not entered courtroom.
/end analysis
Bald scrawny guy and morbidly obese woman. Bald scrawny guy and morbidly obese woman are same height. Morbidly obese woman has fugitive photo that lists her height as 5'4.
Bald scrawny guy follows around morbidly obese woman and carries her huge bag.
Morbidly obese woman has hair in some sort of bouffant.
Black slacks, polka dot shirt, red sneakers seen walking with two very rotund people. Two rotund people appear to be related, both very obese and socially awkward.
"Two rotund people" confused intelligence analysis until further investigation revealed it to be lawsuit plaintiff and his disgusting sister.
Have not entered courtroom.
/end analysis
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Reading comprehension
()
Date: June 13, 2015 02:34AM
The letter says "sorry didn't finish this letter until well after March 23"
So anyone with a fully developed brain can conclude the letter was started on March 23rd and finished sometime "well after"
Reading is fundemental. Being a retard is detrimental!
So anyone with a fully developed brain can conclude the letter was started on March 23rd and finished sometime "well after"
Reading is fundemental. Being a retard is detrimental!
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Dummy dyke
()
Date: June 13, 2015 02:40AM
It took that dyke from March 23 to April 5 to finish. What a dumb monkey dyke.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Strath road faggot
()
Date: June 13, 2015 02:43AM
It's probably because she went and added the new crime eesh had committed.
Now let's talk about dumb homosexuals.
Why would people at a bus stop take someone's hubcaps? What car are they putting it on if they ride the bus? And there's no bus stop in a cult-de-sac so what happened to Misery's hubcaps?
Now let's talk about dumb homosexuals.
Why would people at a bus stop take someone's hubcaps? What car are they putting it on if they ride the bus? And there's no bus stop in a cult-de-sac so what happened to Misery's hubcaps?
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
What's missing?
()
Date: June 13, 2015 02:45AM
Riiiight Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You think you know things but you really have no idea.
>
> There's a really huge chunk of this missing.
>
> Do you really think this was enough to grant a
> protective order without a warrant or arrest
> first? You should probably look into that
I wonder what eesh isn't telling everyone. Why does that protective order website say you need to have an arrest or a warrant out to have one granted first?
-------------------------------------------------------
> You think you know things but you really have no idea.
>
> There's a really huge chunk of this missing.
>
> Do you really think this was enough to grant a
> protective order without a warrant or arrest
> first? You should probably look into that
I wonder what eesh isn't telling everyone. Why does that protective order website say you need to have an arrest or a warrant out to have one granted first?
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
HMMMMMMM WONDER HMMMMMMMM
()
Date: June 13, 2015 02:51AM
So what are we not being told? If there was no arrest or warrant how was this granted?
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Quandary Nonimary Ficklefairy La
()
Date: June 13, 2015 02:52AM
HMMMMMMM WONDER HMMMMMMMM Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So what are we not being told? If there was no
> arrest or warrant how was this granted?
?!?!?!
-------------------------------------------------------
> So what are we not being told? If there was no
> arrest or warrant how was this granted?
?!?!?!
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Mo the frog killer
()
Date: June 13, 2015 02:53AM
Monique abused her ex girlfriend. Even threatened to rape her.
Killed a frog in retaliation.
Killed a frog in retaliation.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Go call Katie Eastman Michael
()
Date: June 13, 2015 02:55AM
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Mo the violator
()
Date: June 13, 2015 02:59AM
Mo violates protective orders
Mo violates teen girls
Mo violates teen girls
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
"I'm just walking"
()
Date: June 13, 2015 03:00AM
LMAO at those dumb Youtube videos. "I'm just walking not stalking."
LAWL
LAWL
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Goodnight faggot see you June 24
()
Date: June 13, 2015 03:01AM
Mo is going to violate someone's ass with her creditable testimony again on June 24th!
Goodnight!
Goodnight!
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABABA
()
Date: June 13, 2015 03:04AM
lol @ those YouTube videos being the used as proof to show someone was coming from a gas station and at McDonald's and had read to be in that area and that they were on the other side of the road! Totally going against what the criminal complaint said, HA! Got em!
LOL @ police not listening to a lying whore's phone calls anymore! OMG SHE TALKED TO A PIZZA DRIVER IM IN FEAR FOR MY LIFE!
OMG SHES POSTING NOT ABOUT ME ON FFUX IM IN FEAR FOR MY LIFE!
LOL @ some "threatening Facebook video" being seen by the prosecutor and she rolling her eye!
LOL @ all of this! Goodnight for real.
LOL @ police not listening to a lying whore's phone calls anymore! OMG SHE TALKED TO A PIZZA DRIVER IM IN FEAR FOR MY LIFE!
OMG SHES POSTING NOT ABOUT ME ON FFUX IM IN FEAR FOR MY LIFE!
LOL @ some "threatening Facebook video" being seen by the prosecutor and she rolling her eye!
LOL @ all of this! Goodnight for real.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Auto correct fail
()
Date: June 13, 2015 03:05AM
REASON*** lol @ "had read"
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Keep saying it, still not true
()
Date: June 13, 2015 03:06AM
"I'm just walking not stalking."
"I'm just walking not stalking."
"I'm just walking not stalking."
"I'm just walking not stalking."
"I'm just walking not stalking."
"I'm just walking not stalking."
"I'm just walking not stalking."
"I'm just walking not stalking."
"I'm just walking not stalking."
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Its been fun but my man needs me
()
Date: June 13, 2015 03:06AM
Hey everyone! Look at eesh anon troll! Look at him. So obvious, so desperate, so butthurt by his many failures today and the many more he will soon suffer!
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Misery loves his company <3
()
Date: June 13, 2015 03:08AM
I'd love to stay and chat but my man needs some lovin!
Have fun typing to yourself and being all angry and jealous about everything and hating your life and failing all over, offline and online.
Suicide. Consider it! Now! You have no reason to live!
Goodbye!
Have fun typing to yourself and being all angry and jealous about everything and hating your life and failing all over, offline and online.
Suicide. Consider it! Now! You have no reason to live!
Goodbye!
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
LAWL
()
Date: June 13, 2015 03:08AM
"I'm just walking not stalking."
"I'm just walking not stalking."
"I'm just walking not stalking."
"I'm just walking not stalking."
"I'm just walking not stalking."
"I'm just walking not stalking."
"I'm just walking not stalking."
"I'm just walking not stalking."
"I'm just walking not stalking."
"I'm just walking not stalking."
"I'm just walking not stalking."
"I'm just walking not stalking."
"I'm just walking not stalking."
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
()
Date: June 13, 2015 03:08AM
WAIT FOR IT...
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Predictable faggot on the loose
()
Date: June 13, 2015 03:09AM
LAWL!
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
()
Date: June 13, 2015 03:14AM
Damn son! Called it!
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Walking Not Stalking
()
Date: June 13, 2015 03:32AM
Your honor, I was walking not stalking!
The perfect defense.
The perfect defense.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Than you; we are - H A P P I E R
()
Date: June 13, 2015 03:33AM
lol yep. We're going to sleep now.
Together. In each other's embrace.
Together. In each other's embrace.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
i walk therefore i stalk
()
Date: June 13, 2015 03:45AM
Walking Not Stalking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Your honor, I was walking not stalking!
>
>
> The perfect defense.
Translation: stalking while walking.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Your honor, I was walking not stalking!
>
>
> The perfect defense.
Translation: stalking while walking.
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
bux7N
()
Date: June 13, 2015 04:10AM
HMMMMMMM WONDER HMMMMMMMM Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So what are we not being told? If there was no
> arrest or warrant how was this granted?
not granted yet
-------------------------------------------------------
> So what are we not being told? If there was no
> arrest or warrant how was this granted?
not granted yet
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
try to keep up
()
Date: June 13, 2015 04:12AM
bux7N Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> HMMMMMMM WONDER HMMMMMMMM Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > So what are we not being told? If there was no
> > arrest or warrant how was this granted?
>
>
> not granted yet
it was granted for 6 months
the PERMANENT one has not been granted
try not to be so retarded
-------------------------------------------------------
> HMMMMMMM WONDER HMMMMMMMM Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > So what are we not being told? If there was no
> > arrest or warrant how was this granted?
>
>
> not granted yet
it was granted for 6 months
the PERMANENT one has not been granted
try not to be so retarded
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
nywNJ
()
Date: June 13, 2015 04:14AM
try to keep up Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> bux7N Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > HMMMMMMM WONDER HMMMMMMMM Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > So what are we not being told? If there was
> no
> > > arrest or warrant how was this granted?
> >
> >
> > not granted yet
>
>
> it was granted for 6 months
>
> the PERMANENT one has not been granted
>
> try not to be so retarded
it is continued not granted
the hearing is granted = no protective order yet
-------------------------------------------------------
> bux7N Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > HMMMMMMM WONDER HMMMMMMMM Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > So what are we not being told? If there was
> no
> > > arrest or warrant how was this granted?
> >
> >
> > not granted yet
>
>
> it was granted for 6 months
>
> the PERMANENT one has not been granted
>
> try not to be so retarded
it is continued not granted
the hearing is granted = no protective order yet
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Educating retards
()
Date: June 13, 2015 04:15AM
There are 3 types of protective orders they go like this:
Emergency protective order - what Megan first got
Preliminary protective order - what Lizzie has and Megan now has
Permanent protective order - They all do the same thing the only difference is their time frame
The preliminary protective order is in place right now. The next hearing is for an extension or for it put in place permanently. (Aka two years)
Emergency protective order - what Megan first got
Preliminary protective order - what Lizzie has and Megan now has
Permanent protective order - They all do the same thing the only difference is their time frame
The preliminary protective order is in place right now. The next hearing is for an extension or for it put in place permanently. (Aka two years)
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
CNyJW
()
Date: June 13, 2015 04:20AM
I spoke with liz and she was upset there is no protective order yet and she has to wait until it is granted at a later date
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
Okaaay
()
Date: June 13, 2015 04:22AM
Except there is a protective order lol
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
D77LX
()
Date: June 13, 2015 04:29AM
Okaaay Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Except there is a protective order lol
wrong
eesh has posted FROM HIS NAME DIRECTLY TO LIZ and guess what NOTHING HAPPENED
just like I said
-------------------------------------------------------
> Except there is a protective order lol
wrong
eesh has posted FROM HIS NAME DIRECTLY TO LIZ and guess what NOTHING HAPPENED
just like I said
Re: Eesh loses in court again
Posted by:
lol why are you sooooo mad?!???!
()
Date: June 13, 2015 04:32AM
There's still a protective order..lol dude why are you so heavily invested in all of this? This shit is so funny. You can keep saying there's no protective order but everyone knows there is. It's just not permanent yet. Stop crying and get over it.
Again, there's a preliminary protective order.
Once more, this is a protective order.
Eesh was served it in court today like Lizzie said she would make happen.
How is Eesh going to file a motion on something that doesn't exist then?
Please stop being retarded lmao
Again, there's a preliminary protective order.
Once more, this is a protective order.
Eesh was served it in court today like Lizzie said she would make happen.
How is Eesh going to file a motion on something that doesn't exist then?
Please stop being retarded lmao