We all know that men do this all the time as a way to meet the opposite sex, and it's not thought twice about. But what if the roles were reversed? How would you feel? Would you like that? Do you think it's acceptable?

This is a great question and it causes great concern.

A Hispanic bought me a drink last year and told me she was going to, "Fuck me steal everything I had and then kill me!" I reported this to FCPD got a case number and the Officer's name. When I put in a FOIA request I was told this case number didn't exist, along with a few others. What does this mean?

I was also proposition by a Hispanic, got it on tape. Another Hispanic told me if I pursued it the police would arrest me or worse. I suspect she works with the police, I have seen her with DC police.

I have heard that FCPD is abusive tolds men at bars and I am seeing it first hand...any serious thoughts on my situation?

another classic post by pgens

spunky Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We all know that men do this all the time as a way
> to meet the opposite sex, and it's not thought
> twice about. But what if the roles were reversed?
> How would you feel? Would you like that? Do you
> think it's acceptable?


The gal is obviously some whacked out tramp with serious STDs. I'll answer for some other regulars here:

Gravis - Feeling threatened, Gravis would go on the attack using inappropriate and sexually suggestive IT terms like "breaching the firewall" and calling her "a C++"

Meade - Feeling threatened, would just sit there quietly, staring, drinking his Sweet Tea or Mint Julep, until even this disease-ridden floozy would get creeped out.

Pgens - You already have his answer.

Registered Voter - Feeling threatened, would start complaining about how the sexual revolution has ruined this country and how he longs for the days when women were still considered a man's property.

Vince - Feeling threatened, would give the woman an hour-long dissertation on why she shouldn't think of herself as a sexual object and how she should be proud of her womanhood. He would then get her a cab and send her home. After which, he would go into the bar's restroom and masturbate furiously in the bathroom stall.

I agree with this thread.

I've had plenty of women buy me a drink\shot. I accept and then buy a drink back.

Hell, I had one girl who wanted to get laid so bad she paid my entire bar tab to get me to leave. No problem with that, I returned the favor later.

now I have met you, lurker, and I am just going to go ahead and call bullshit right now... either that, or she mistook you for wallace shawn like all of us do, and thought she was going to get a volley of "inconceivable" shouts during the big act...

If I was drinking at a bar with Muhammad Atta and Elliott from DC101, I would tell her to bug off. Unless she was pretty, of course.

I would thank her, drink the drink, ask her for another, order a third one for myself, then have her explain what she was doing out of the kitchen.

I'd tell her she was overstepping her boundaries
Attachments:

Lurker. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I've had plenty of women buy me a drink\shot. I
> accept and then buy a drink back.
>
> Hell, I had one girl who wanted to get laid so
> bad she paid my entire bar tab to get me to leave.
> No problem with that, I returned the favor later.

-- "she paid my entire bar tab to get me to leave."??? This does not sound like a pick-up! Was is Psycho #3? She has been known to buy people drinks, but it does not help her cause in any way!

Later...
RESton Peace Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> now I have met you, lurker, and I am just going to
> go ahead and call bullshit right now... either
> that, or she mistook you for wallace shawn like
> all of us do, and thought she was going to get a
> volley of "inconceivable" shouts during the big
> act...

+1

Thank you RES!!!! Usually I am the only one to make these statements! And good "pun-placement" in your response!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/13/2008 11:44AM by SRE.

>
> Vince - Feeling threatened, would give the woman
> an hour-long dissertation on why she shouldn't
> think of herself as a sexual object and how she
> should be proud of her womanhood. He would then
> get her a cab and send her home. After which, he
> would go into the bar's restroom and masturbate
> furiously in the bathroom stall.


Actually..Id be thrilled by the compliment..turned on by her agressiveness...at which point she'd probably leave and Id have to go the men's room and masturbate!

WashingToneLocian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Pgens - You already have his answer.

Actually that was Spunky's answer... I just re-worded one of her crazy rants to be appropriate to this thread. I wonder if Spunky would argue with recordings of herself?

pgens Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WashingToneLocian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Pgens - You already have his answer.
>
> Actually that was Spunky's answer... I just
> re-worded one of her crazy rants to be appropriate
> to this thread. I wonder if Spunky would argue
> with recordings of herself?

That would be awesome. An infinite loop of, "You got spunk'd!" "No, you got PWNED!" "No, you got spunk'd!"...

No I am a really sweet and wonderful person given a chance with decent humans!

Well you sound like a goddamn wacko.


spunky Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No I am a really sweet and wonderful person given
> a chance with decent humans!

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well you sound like a goddamn wacko.
>
>
> spunky Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > No I am a really sweet and wonderful person
> given
> > a chance with decent humans!


You obviously are not a decent human, so pound sand and eat some while your at it.

Meeper, you could start with the sand in her vagina. Just watch out for the centipedes.

I am a lady and I resent that comment.

Like I said before...you are just crude, rude and socially unacceptable!

That's the sweetest thing you could have possibly said to me.

spunky Wrote:
>> You are obviously not a decent human


Neither are people who insult the thousands of people who died on 9/11 by insinuating it was an inside-job. There is nothing decent about that at all, period.

End of story.

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> spunky Wrote:
> >> You are obviously not a decent human
>
>
> Neither are people who insult the thousands of
> people who died on 9/11 by insinuating it was an
> inside-job. There is nothing decent about that at
> all, period.
>
> End of story.

There is more to this story and I know what I saw and it would not be decent to bury it. We would not have believed that Bush wasn't a decent human but look what time has shown. He is the insult to the thousands who died just like oil is the real reason we went into Iraq...fool!

For you not to consider the possiblity of what I am telling you to be the truth is narrow- mindedness and what this administration counts on. For Atta to be at a VIP function is total arrogance which is what this administration is known for. I know the gravity of what I am saying and would never repeat it if it weren't true.

Factual story but not end of story.

d



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 06/01/2010 01:25PM by inkahootz.

f



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 06/01/2010 01:23PM by inkahootz.

Do you ever wonder what life would be like if you'd had enough oxygen at birth?




spunky Wrote:
> >
> > End of story.
>
> There is more to this story and I know what I saw
> and it would not be decent to bury it. We would
> not have believed that Bush wasn't a decent human
> but look what ti me has shown. He is the insult to
> the thousands who died just like oil is the real
> reason we went into Iraq...fool!
>
> For you not to consider the possiblity of what I
> amy you to be the truth is narrow-
> mindedness and what this administration counts on.
> For Atta to be at a VIP function is total
> arrogance which is what this administration is
> known for. I know the gravity of what I am saying
> and would never repeat it if it weren't true.
>
> Factual story but not end of story.

SRE Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lurker. Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -- "she paid my entire bar tab to get me to
> leave."??? This does not sound like a pick-up!
> Was is Psycho #3? She has been known to buy
> people drinks, but it does not help her cause in
> any way!

The girl I was referencing in the original post was not pyscho #3(or any other #'s) and I have not seen since that night.

Yes, pyscho #3 has bought me a drink, in fact she offered to buy me dinner one night, and I know another person who posts here that she has also been bought drinks for...

And RES, she had a smoking hot body also. She asked me "What do u think about sex?" I said, "That's do able." She said, "Ok let's go!" I said, "Wait until the 7 inning and we'll leave" Somehow she got my bar tab and paid it.

She said she hadn't been laid in over year and just wanted to laid, nothing more. Worked for me.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/13/2008 04:32PM by Lurker..

inkahootz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> TheMeeper Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > spunky Wrote:
> > >> You are obviously not a decent human
> >
> >
> > Neither are people who insult the thousands of
> > people who died on 9/11 by insinuating it was
> an
> > inside-job. There is nothing decent about that
> at
> > all, period.
> >
> > End of story.
>
>
> The fact is that the Bush administraion acted very
> unscrupulously post 9/11. They withheld the
> Pentagon videos, impeded the 9/11 commission
> (after preventing an independent investigation as
> well), and denied having any foreknowledge (via
> foreign and domestic intelligence agencies). This
> added fuel to the fire of all conspiracy
> theorists. When you hold back information, people
> are left to their own devices and draw their own
> conclusions. I believe the Bush administration is
> equally culpable of being a catalyst for the
> abundance of ridiculous, shameful, and
> reprehensible theories. We know the administration
> had some degree of foreknowledge of an impending
> threat. What we will never know is whether they
> purposely ignored the threat (for nefarious goals
> or not), or if it was just another example of the
> 'bureaucratic' blind leading the naked. Could they
> really be that stupid? Look at George W.
> Bush...anything is possible and plausible!



All you can say is that it looks like a deomlition job like any other demolition job. Alex Jones says they have traces of explosives which all went into a protected land fill. But on the other hand why explode the buildings? Wouldn't it be enough just to crash into them?

Let's not forget Sandy Berger destroying information in the National Archives... perhaps this went beyond more than just Bush - it seems that the Clinton administration was intent on keeping information locked away also.

Rod Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> All you can say is that it looks like a deomlition
> job like any other demolition job. Alex Jones says
> they have traces of explosives which all went into
> a protected land fill. But on the other hand why
> explode the buildings? Wouldn't it be enough just
> to crash into them?

The definitive source that explains it all...

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

Yes but the popular mechanics article is regurally debunked on the show

www.infowars.com

www.prisonplanet.com

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Let's not forget Sandy Berger destroying
> information in the National Archives... perhaps
> this went beyond more than just Bush - it seems
> that the Clinton administration was intent on
> keeping information locked away also.



Thank you RV, after all it was in 2000 that Atta was at this function, which was during Clinton's admin.

This was somewhat of a military associated function...get my drift?

There were other sitings I haven't mentioned due to your responce, associated with the military.

But nothing could be done without the express order from the Chief...correct?

Spunky you are spot on!

We need to get together and talk. Here's some other stuff I found http://www.ufomind.com/area51/people/jarod2/

>> Spunky you are spot on!
Attachments:

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> spunky Wrote:
> >> You are obviously not a decent human
>
>
> Neither are people who insult the thousands of
> people who died on 9/11 by insinuating it was an
> inside-job. There is nothing decent about that at
> all, period.
>
> End of story.

I don't know how it is an insult towards the people who died to question the official story.

That line of logic just doesn't make any sense. It seems like a good way to silence dissent, to shame them in some way, but there's no logic to it, whatsoever.

How does it insult the victims?

Bob Wrote:
>>> How does it insult the victims?


Because it cheapens their deaths into conspiratorial bullshit. Face it, a couple of crazy assholes hijacked planes and killed them.

It ruined the lives of everyone around them. Yet, you choose to exploit those people as if they are victims of some fictional political agenda.

It's a fabricated argument that consciously chooses to ignore responsibility, and panders to ignorance and paranoia.

An attitude that completely sells out to the terrorists.

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bob Wrote:
> >>> How does it insult the victims?
>
>
> Because it cheapens their deaths into
> conspiratorial bullshit. Face it, a couple of
> crazy assholes hijacked planes and killed them.
>
> It ruined the lives of everyone around them. Yet,
> you choose to exploit those people as if they are
> victims of some fictional political agenda.
>
> It's a fabricated argument that consciously
> chooses to ignore responsibility, and panders to
> ignorance and paranoia.
>
> An attitude that completely sells out to the
> terrorists.



There's nothing fabricated about anything I reported.

Aren't we selling out to terrorist already by not thoroughly investigating everything in relationship to that event, especially given all the events exposed afterwards? Rather you like it or not we are already pandering to ignorance and paranoia, which explains why there's an upswing of it in people, per recent studies.

I feel it brings honor to the victims and their families to try and get to the truth and not ignore it!

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bob Wrote:
> >>> How does it insult the victims?
>
>
> Because it cheapens their deaths into
> conspiratorial bullshit. Face it, a couple of
> crazy assholes hijacked planes and killed them.
>
> It ruined the lives of everyone around them. Yet,
> you choose to exploit those people as if they are
> victims of some fictional political agenda.
>
> It's a fabricated argument that consciously
> chooses to ignore responsibility, and panders to
> ignorance and paranoia.
>
> An attitude that completely sells out to the
> terrorists.


I don't see it that way. I'm not one of those "inside job" types, but I feel that the lies and misinformation of the "official story" simply tries to deflect blame away from politicians and agencies that could have prevented, or should have prevented or at least in hindsight have extreme quilt for the mistakes they made.

By expecting that our government should be accountable for it's mistakes does not in any way exploit the victims.


Claiming that questioning political posturing and blame aversion is actually the exploitation of the victims. You are using the dead as a way to say "we don't want to question anything, and we're going to prop up the dead in order to say that anyone who questions it is insulting the memory of the dead.

Considering that a very large number of family members of 9/11 victims question the official story, it would seem that they are doing their best to honor their dead family members by getting the real answers, not just the whitewashed, no blame official story.

If we all just chose to agree with whatever people who have an interest in protecting their own assess so that we don't dishonor or disrespect the vicitims, we'll never be sure that there aren't more victims some day in the future when the same mistakes are made again and something like 9/11 happens again since we automatically absolved those that might have been able to prevent it so as not to offend the victims.

Bob Wrote:
>> deflect blame away from politicians and agencies that could have prevented, or should have prevented or at least in hindsight have extreme quilt for the mistakes they made.


Well that's not what I am talking about, at all. Questioning the way the govt. handled intel prior to the attack is not a conspiracy theory.

I was referring to retards like Spunky who claim they saw Mohammed Atta in a navy uniform at some VIP event.

I did see him Meep and your the retard for being for closed minded.

Without any scrap of proof to back up anything you're saying, you are and shall remain a deranged idiot, destined to spend the rest of your life in a padded room eating your own feces and screaming at imaginary squirrels.

Knowing I saw him doesn't make me an idiot it just makes me solo. and I can deal with that. Given what Bush has also done it's plausible that it happened. Because I saw something does not dome me to nothing like a padded room as you suggest, unless I saw your face! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha!

Get back in your closet! And slap your face while your at it!!

spunky Wrote:
>>> I did see him Meep and your the retard for being for closed minded.


Either you do not understand the meaning of "close minded", or you are intentionally misusing it for ad hominem purposes.

Close-mindedness is a refusal to accept ideas, opinions, and beliefs. It has nothing to do with mistrusting dubious information that is being presented as fact.

According to your logic, anyone who doesn't believe in Elvis sightings or Sasquatch is "close minded". But in reality, they are being "skeptical"- a word that is synonymous with the term "free thinking".

One shred of evidence. Anything, to back up any single one of your ridiculous statements. Anything. A scanned document, a picture, a link to the "Where's Spunky?" government website, a link to the audio recordings of the illegal hispanic that you have, ANYTHING.

Back up ANY one thing that you've said, and I will leave you alone.

Well you already know it's there by you mentioning Outback. For me to provide the information would expose me to you, and a hand I'm not prepared to show yet.

There's been other clues dropped in this site and you are aware of them

Besides Elliot helped put DOD on Michelle's ass, which wasn't cool, he can't be trusted!

What's the matter Spunky? Didn't get your waffles this morning?

If you won't provide proof, you may as well accept that people are going to call you a crazy idiot, you crazy idiot.

I would also like to take this opportunity to state that, last night, I had a threesome with Evan Rachel Wood and Megan Fox. Ron Jeremy was there to film it, and said it was, "the hottest thing he's ever seen, ever."

I am now a god among men.

iHop Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What's the matter Spunky? Didn't get your waffles
> this morning?


What's that suppose to mean????

spunky Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I did see him Meep and your the retard for being
> for closed minded.


Well Meep, there you have it. The ultimate irony.

A paranoid delusional schizophrenic lunatic, who has no life, calling someone a retard.

I bet that is something Elliot would say. Then again so might anyone who read your threads Spunky(2)



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/14/2008 02:30PM by Registered Voter.