I have not even read the first post and scan down to see lizzie is here shitting all over the place. Please go away so we can enjoy the case at hand.

Signed

Everyone on FFXU

What's up with the huge clit?

Im really interested now!
Attachments:

Yeah bitch get lost.

Yeah bitch get lost.

Lizzie no one cares about you this is between eesh and misery. Leave you attention whore.


And yes you guys wasting your time and money and continuing to do the stupid things you do is great entertainment. Thx for the lulz. We're laughing at you not with you.


Going to court to watch this great soap opera is creepy? But driving from Richmond to sterling to stalk someone isn't? Even a public leader BrianS said he would pay to watch this shit.

Time to lawyer up, don't spend too much in old town, you're going to need that money.

Stabitha Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What's up with the huge clit?
>
> Im really interested now!


((|))

Anyone see Gerrymanderer2 there?

CourtObserver

Thanks for posting the details - I would ignore eesh as he seems very paranoid and ALWAYS thinks he knows who is posting anon, it is like a sickness.

Glad you registered your user name, so we can watch this drama unfold through a reputable poster.

If you have the info? Is this just the small case between misery and eesh or is it all of them combined - family etc...?

PnMYG Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> CourtObserver
>
> Thanks for posting the details - I would ignore
> eesh as he seems very paranoid and ALWAYS thinks
> he knows who is posting anon, it is like a
> sickness.


+10000

I only post anon and have been told by eesh that I'm some registered poster multiple times.

Thanks for the support to all who have offered it!

I think I will take your advice and ignore the negativity.

I happened to have a case at the courthouse today that was delayed, and so I was able to check into the courtroom this morning. I cannot know at this time whether I will be around and available on the next court date. I DO have a day job and paying clients, after all. But if so, I'll certainly feel free to drop into the courtroom to observe and report.

To PnMYG, today's hearing was just on the Misery v. Eesh case. As far as I know, there has been no consolidation of this case with any other(s).

To those asking about whether I saw any other Fairfax Underground posters in the courtroom, I would have no idea what any of them look like (other than people who put their pictures up or who have had their pictures put up). I doubt that many, if any, were there, though. I knew most of the people there, and they were almost all attorneys who had business before the court. I only saw two non-lawyers there (other than Eesh and Lizzie). One was a young heavyset man who I mistakenly thought at the time might be Misery but who Lizzie has since said was not him, and an older woman.

Well... It has been a brutal work week, and I am off now to enjoy a fun, drama-free Friday evening. I'll check back in late tonight to see if there are any other questions people have that I can answer.

CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> and an older woman.


That was actually Vexxed

Did he look like a faggot in person? Would you say thats a cocksucker right there if you saw him?

Mo fuglynique Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lizzie no one cares about you this is between eesh
> and misery. Leave you attention whore.
>
>
> And yes you guys wasting your time and money and
> continuing to do the stupid things you do is great
> entertainment. Thx for the lulz. We're laughing at
> you not with you.
>
>
> Going to court to watch this great soap opera is
> creepy? But driving from Richmond to sterling to
> stalk someone isn't? Even a public leader BrianS
> said he would pay to watch this shit.
>
> Time to lawyer up, don't spend too much in old
> town, you're going to need that money.
Attachments:

Both lizzie and eesh are a part of the thread as made by the OP and another poster.

Just look at those two idiots in that pic. Theyre posing for a pic because they think theyre cool on a website going to a court hearing together because one of them is getting sued. Its the epitome of stupidity.

I bet they thought lizzie would be a witness crucial to eeshs defense lmao.

CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thanks for the support to all who have offered
> it!
>
> I think I will take your advice and ignore the
> negativity.
>
> I happened to have a case at the courthouse today
> that was delayed, and so I was able to check into
> the courtroom this morning. I cannot know at this
> time whether I will be around and available on the
> next court date. I DO have a day job and paying
> clients, after all. But if so, I'll certainly
> feel free to drop into the courtroom to observe
> and report.
>
> To PnMYG, today's hearing was just on the Misery
> v. Eesh case. As far as I know, there has been no
> consolidation of this case with any other(s).
>
> To those asking about whether I saw any other
> Fairfax Underground posters in the courtroom, I
> would have no idea what any of them look like
> (other than people who put their pictures up or
> who have had their pictures put up). I doubt that
> many, if any, were there, though. I knew most of
> the people there, and they were almost all
> attorneys who had business before the court. I
> only saw two non-lawyers there (other than Eesh
> and Lizzie). One was a young heavyset man who I
> mistakenly thought at the time might be Misery but
> who Lizzie has since said was not him, and an
> older woman.
>
> Well... It has been a brutal work week, and I am
> off now to enjoy a fun, drama-free Friday evening.
> I'll check back in late tonight to see if there
> are any other questions people have that I can
> answer.


Why wont you help eesh with his legal pleadings etc.

dJpmD Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?2,file=174671,filename=william_moreno_arrest.jp
> g>


Amazing how this post made the thread come to a screeching halt.

When are you gouing back ?
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> dJpmD Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > >
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
>
> >
> hp?2,file=174671,filename=william_moreno_arrest.jp
>
> > g>
>
>
> Amazing how this post made the thread come to a
> screeching halt.

They look like nice people there Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Both lizzie and eesh are a part of the thread as
> made by the OP and Megan Toohey*

Fortunately Megan was not there. She would have claimed harassment for being in the same county as her.

eesh Wrote

> CourthouseObserver Wrote:
> ------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > To Eesh....
> >
> > I hope this is my last message to you...
> >
> > Why are you so angry at me? And why are you
> > resorting to name calling?
> >
> > I don't know if I stuck out like a sore thumb
> or
> > not; clearly, given the name you have made up
> in
> > an attempt to denigrate me, I am not who you
> think
> > I was. But I could care less if you or anyone
> > else knows who I am. I have a right to be in
> any
> > courtroom I want. I don't have to sneak around
> to
> > do it. And I am well-known enough in the legal
> > community that 90 percent of the people in the
> > courtroom know me and I know them.
> >
> > Dude... The court will see this website. You
> are
> > in trouble. When in a hole, stop digging, for
> > heaven's sake.
> >
> > Again, I am not your enemy. I don't understand
> > why you insist on treating me that way.
> >
> > Good luck... And get some legal representation!
>
>
>
> No, you are a fucking creepy old man that enjoys
> hanging out in courtrooms. Watch a soap opera or
> something.


Eesh,
You trip on someone watching the case and think they should mind their own business, but you go to peoples homes and don't mind your own business.
Shoes on the other foot. Your not in control this time, and you cant handle it.
This case is interesting, it may show what we can and cannot get away with here. I'd go, but its too much hassle and waiting.
And the guy said he'd hook you up with an Atty pro bono. Why dog on him?
But anyhow, best of luck.

The OP is a troll, I'll explain when I get home.

Blessed are the murderous.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The OP is a troll, I'll explain when I get home.

Fucker....you been on your way home for 6 hours now. Is it taking that long to dream up your story?

So angry, so desperate to see my response.

Typical eesh behavior when things aren't going his way.

Accuse poster of being Eli or someone else, accuse poster of trolling, accuse poster of not knowing what their talking about, try to take credibility away from the poster.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fortunately Megan was not there. She would have
> claimed harassment for being in the same county as
> her.




eesh has been accused of so much but wasn't ever arrested, no one finds that strange? There has to be concrete proof and heavy probable cause for something like this to take place.

I am seriously on pins and needles.

If I wasn't a basement troll, I might miss this.

MDyyx Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Fortunately Megan was not there. She would have
> > claimed harassment for being in the same county
> as
> > her.
>
>
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?40,file=178395,filename=image.jpg>
>
> eesh has been accused of so much but wasn't ever
> arrested, no one finds that strange? There has to
> be concrete proof and heavy probable cause for
> something like this to take place.



I know, but credibility is everything when talking to the police. You can bring evidence, and explain in an intelligent manner what is happening.....or you can cry wolf for a year.

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/664043.html



Re: how are you celebrating the 9/11 accident?
Posted by: Mr. Misery ()
Date: September 04, 2011 12:23AM

I really want attention in real life, but I'm always too afraid when I get it, so I retreat and isolate myself, while still wanting attention; the wanting, the retreating, the wanting, the retreating. It's a vicious cycle. What you have surmised is true. I'm honest enough to admit it.

having said that, when those people jumped out of the burning buildings, I about bust a gut. It was the funniest, most hysterical thing I have ever seen in life ever. It was the best day of my life. I love 9/11. It was a great thing to happen to this country. It was awesome. Totally radical and tubular. 9/11 rocks.

@ CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> CourthouseObserver Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Correction:
> >
> > At one point in my ridiculously long missive,
> > above, I mistakenly referred to Eesh's attorney.
>
> > To be clear, he did NOT have an attorney. And
> so
> > I meant that to be a reference to Eesh.
>
>
> That was a very good write-up -- clearly written,
> and with a good selection of interesting details
> that brought the picture - the setting, the
> various characters, the drama - to life in
> my mind.
>
> Well done. Seriously.
>
> An experienced pro journalist would likely produce
> something more polished -- but, you know, maybe
> not a whole lot more polished if we were
> looking at a quickly prepared first draft as yet
> ungroomed by the tender ministrations of a style
> editor, and the writer's own revisions and
> emendations.
>
> In short: You have a good eye, a good ear, and
> good sense of the overall picture. Perhaps most
> importantly, you have a feel for the DRAMA of the
> situation. Specifically, you show a very nice
> feel for the nuances and changes that occur in a
> fluid, unfolding drama.
>
> AND you have the ability to synthesize all of
> that, and quickly translate it into fluent,
> readable, not unstylish prose. Although this was
> no great spectacle, your account made the
> "mini-drama" of this morning's events interesting
> and engaging. You brought it to life.
>
> Your ability to perceive all these things, and
> convey them to the reader, demonstrates a gift for
> non-fiction storytelling -- for narrative
> journalism.
>
> It demonstrates that you are a writer.
>
> My honest opinion, for what it's worth.

You gonna give him a handjob or something?

Eesh, I seriously doubt this guy is the lamb center troll. You're simply trying to undermine the credibility of our only source of information on your case. I also have a feeling this guy isn't the guy you were looking at either.

___________________________________________________________
“Imitation is suicide.”
-Ralph Waldo Emerson

what I don't understand is how anyone can post Mr. Misery's posts matter of factly and be proud of it =d
he da man !

Eesh....did they move Richmond? It's now a 10 hour drive from Alexandria?

95 South Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh....did they move Richmond? It's now a 10 hour
> drive from Alexandria?


Let the lad relax and enjoy his day. I'm eager to hear the rest of the story as well, but I'll be patient.

I can predict with absolute 100% undeniable undisputable evidence that eesh has no idea who the op is

eesh will scour through hundreds of posts and hours of research to try to find something, but end up with zero

eesh will TRY to say he knows, but does not and NEVER will unless the op decides to tell him

misery>eesh

#notcriminals
#havejobs
#donotlivewithmommy
#notadulterers

95 Right Up Your Ass Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 95 South Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Eesh....did they move Richmond? It's now a 10
> hour
> > drive from Alexandria?
>
>
> Let the lad relax and enjoy his day. I'm eager to
> hear the rest of the story as well, but I'll be
> patient.




Yeah, just got back home. It was nice walking around Old Town Alexandria, and Fort Belvoir has changed so much since I ETS'd there back in 2007. Even with the sequestration they are really putting a lot of money into that post.


Driving down was a mess, hopefully the express lanes will go right into Richmond one day.

That meme doesn't actually make any sense. I haven't seen any evidence of lizzie or eesh posting or shitting on any threads that don't involve them. That seems to be where my of their posting goes to - threads about them.

Now, if we want to face reality and bring up actual issues of people who thrive on drama and post on and shit on threads where they aren't the topic or apart of the discussion we can point out why Megan Toohey called Papa John's.

Yo OP, Tanks for covering the proceedings. FFU IS better than TV. Everyone here contributes to the drama and entertainment. Everyone should give themselves a pat on the back and head to Kilroys on Wed Nite. Don't forget the Timmy Slaw.

Cy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Don't forget the Timmy Slaw.


That's what I came here for!

We can just ignore that ever happened, ignore the terrible grammar and sentence structure and the retaliatory nature of the meme. Ignore that it was in response to eesh saying Megan is attracted to turmoil and strife the way a fly is attracted to cow dung that made it so darned obvious.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/13/2015 11:12PM by Nostradamus.

better call saul Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> this is all very troubling for me. some old guy
> going to eesh's trial, the simple fact that eesh
> had to go to trial for "bullying" a grown man on a
> niche website on the internet, lizzie being
> dressed up nicely, lizzie still not being my gf,
> none of this is comfortable for me.
>
> I am a maelstrom of discontent and I've gotta tell
> you, I've had just about enough of this bullshit



Yeah....that's the thing. This suit opened a Pandora's Box for the plaintiffs. As I said before, all this supposed turmoil was limited to a single site on the internet, but now, everything will be in public documents; a certain plaintiff will have to take the stand in front of a jury and a courtroom full of people...


...speaking of that, Mr. Misery's behavior in front of the Henrico judge for my permanent protective order hearing is a definite predictor of future behavior. I just don't know how the plaintiffs will be able to handle going before a court and explaining in detail what has supposedly happened to them. So short sighted.

Get busy gathering all the info you can on the OP so you can prove to people on the interwebz that he is not credible and everything with you is fine and dandy.

Cuz ya know you just didn't have to spend your whole day and money dealing with this non-problem.

popcorn in microwave Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> " Instead, contended that he had not been properly
> served and asked the judge to quash service."
>
>
> LOL!
>
> Did the lawyer point out eesh was dumb enough to
> post the documents on FFXU after he was served?



Actually, I had a reason for posting those documents, and it worked out well in the end.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> popcorn in microwave Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > " Instead, contended that he had not been
> properly
> > served and asked the judge to quash service."
> >
> >
> > LOL!
> >
> > Did the lawyer point out eesh was dumb enough
> to
> > post the documents on FFXU after he was
> served?
>
>
>
> Actually, I had a reason for posting those
> documents, and it worked out well in the end.


no, it did not
but you can pretend all you like, we find you lies and disinformation just charming

the best part of all of this is you will try to intimidate misery here on ffu, but it will not work and your sad reality will be when misery posts AFTER you lose the case

the op already has proven that you have no idea what you are doing in a courtroom and no one will believe any of your bullshit

the false hope is you think that somehow you will be able to introduce miserys threads into the courtroom and interview him like on some TV show, never going to happen, but please base your whole case on that idea

Eesh has been watching how to be a lawyer videos on youtube, and reading wikihow.

Eesh don't need no lawyer.


but seriously...


We will know when eesh really lawyers up, per the advice of his lawyer he will stop posting the day that happens.

CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I had a couple of hour-long break in my schedule
> this morning, and so I decided to drop into
> Fairfax County Circuit Courtroom 4F to observe as
> much as I could of today's proceedings in the case
> of Misery v. Eesh.


No, the judge didn't enter the courtroom until 10:20, and it was well past 12:00 when I got finished. You weren't there because you "had a break."


> My Bottom-Line take on the situation is that Eesh
> is in a lot of trouble here.


No, not actually, but keep wishing that if it makes you feel better.


> First, the atmospherics...
>
> The court was entertaining pretrial and
> interlocutory motions, rather than conducting
> trials and so, for the most part, those present in
> and addressing the court were attorneys for
> plaintiffs and defendants who were arguing their
> motions before the court.


It was just a motions day. Very mundane and mostly continuances before we got to be heard. If your idea of entertainment is listening to attorneys asking for continuances, more power to you.


> Eesh was there, accompanied by Lizzy, and they sat
> together in the back row until their case was
> called.

> Eesh was smartly dressed, with well-pressed Khaki
> pants, a blue blazer, a dress shirt and tie. Lizzy
> was conservatively dressed in black in what
> appeared to be business attire and running shoes.
> While Lizzy sat beside him for much of the time
> that the court was in session, she left the
> courtroom occasionally (to make phone calls, I
> believe) and returned each time. Indeed, she
> actually was out of the courtroom when the Misery
> v. Eesh case was called before the judge and
> missed most of the proceedings.


I get it, you were there and you really want us to know you saw us.


> Someone who I assumed was Misery was there, as
> well, sitting by himself dressed much more
> casually.


No, the plaintiffs weren't there, just the attorney. It was just a motions day.

> Misery's attorney was unconventional in his
> appearance, in that he had long, flowing hair and
> a good amount of facial hair. But he was
> professionally dressed in a dark suit, dress
> shirt, tie, and pocket square, and he comported
> himself well professionally during and after the
> proceedings.

Again, you proved your point. You were there, congratulations.


> The biggest surprise for me, though, was that Eesh
> was appearing pro Se, which (for the few FFX
> Underground users who are not attorneys) means he
> was without counsel.


This was already known on the site.

> The purpose of today's proceedings was for the
> court to hear arguments and rule on a motion by
> Eesh's attorney for summary judgement in the case.


No, it was a motion for default judgement. Summary judgement is entirely different.


> As best as I can understand it (I did not speak
> to any of the parties after the proceedings to
> confirm this), the motion was predicated on the
> fact that Eesh did not file a response to the suit
> within the time period required by law and still
> had not filed a response.


You should have listened more instead of noting how I was dressed.


As a general matter,
> when this occurs, a plantiff (the charging party)
> will ask the court to enter a summary judgement
> against the defendant (the person who is being
> sued) and in favor of the plaintiff.


Charging party? LOL You mean moving party. Again, default judgement, not summary judgement.



> Eesh's "defense" to the motion for summary
> judgement was to file a motion of his own, asking
> the judge to quash service (ask the judge to rule
> that he, the defendant, had not been properly
> served or given notice of the suit and/or not
> given proper notice of the motions filed by the
> plaintiff).


It wasn't a defense. It's called a motion to quash process pursuant to § 8.01-277. You should have listened more.


> Misery's attorney presented a compelling case in
> favor of his motion for summary judgement,
> asserting that the suit and notice had been
> properly served by the Sheriff, offering the court
> proof of the same, and asserting that Eesh had not
> responded to the suit in the proper timeframe.



No, I responded in a timely manner, noting the incomplete service. § 8.01-296(2)(b) lays out what is needed when the service is posted to a door of an abode.

Again, you should have been listening.


He
> asked that, in the alternative, if the judge
> declined to make a summary judgement in favor of
> Misery, that she award Misery $1,900 in attorneys
> fees and costs that had been incurred so far to
> research, prepared, file, and argue the motions
> and that said fees and costs be paid as a
> precondition to allowing Eesh to continue in the
> case without summary judgement.


That's not what he said. LOL at "precondition". At this point you are making things up.


> Appearing on his own behalf, Eesh offered no
> defense to not having responded to the suit.
> Instead, contended that he had not been properly
> served and asked the judge to quash service.


You don't defend yourself on motions day, you explain what happened. It's not a defense, and the judge accepted my explanation.


> The judge agreed with Misery's attorney that
> service had been properly made; that Eesh had not
> responded at all, let alone within the timeframes
> required by law; and that grounds were there for
> summary judgement.


No, this is more bullshit from you. The judge noted the service was incomplete, as the steps laid out in § 8.01-296(2)(b) had not been followed. She also noted that I did respond, and she even said that default judgement cannot occur when service is posted to a door of an abode.

She indicated however, that
> she was reluctant to do so in this instance at
> this time, in part because Eesh was appearing Pro
> Se.


More bullshit from you. The fact I was there Pro Se had no impact on her ruling against the motion for default judgement, or summary judgement as you are determined to call it.


She castigated Eesh for not responding to the
> suit, as well as for his motion to quash service
> -- both on the merits of the motion and for his
> failure to properly file it.


Castigated? Not at all. The motion to quash process had merits, which why she didn't deny it.


> Eesh appeared confused about the legalities of the
> situation he is in and of what he needs to do in
> order to defend himself, saying several times that
> he has no legal training; that he is attending
> school on the GI Bill and has no money for
> attorneys; and that he had consulted an attorney
> who wanted $10,000 from him to take the case,
> which he did not have.


Seriously LOL Where are you getting this from?


> The judge was having none of it.


Actually, she was very laid back and friendly, but we'll go along with your melodramatic story.


> She told him that he was gambling by not having
> counsel and that, at the very least, he needs to
> talk with one. She quizzed him on several aspects
> of court procedure. He was unable to
> satisfactorily answer her.


Again, listen more, dramatize less. The lawyer called me a gambler for acting pro se.


> In the end, she cut him a MAJOR break.


...but you just said "she was having none of that."



> She denied both the motion for summary judgement
> and the motion to quash service.


She denied the motion for default judgement, the motion to quash service will be heard again.



However, she
> gave Eesh ten days to either respond to the suit
> or properly file a motion to quash service,
> whichever he chose to do. On the request by
> Misery's attorney for attorneys fees, she denied
> that request without prejudice, saying that the
> attorney could bring that up again at the
> appropriate time.


Again, your story doesn't add up. You say she denied the motion to quash process, now you say she is allowing 10 days to refile. You can't have both.


> Eesh is in trouble.
>
> My free legal advice to him is ...



Free legal advice from an e-lawyer. This is going to be good.

> First, get an attorney. If you cannot afford one,
> SURELY you can find a First Amendment attorney
> (ACLU, perhaps?) who would do it for free.


Sounds like you have experience with crying to the ACLU for help. Let me guess, your civil rights were trampled upon at one point.


This
> is a significant case that could have implications
> far beyond FFX Underground

Don't kid yourself. This is a vexatious lawsuit, pure and simple.


> Misery's attorney is good. You
> have little hope of prevailing if you are not
> represented, as well.


Fortunately, you don't know what I've been told by the attorneys that I have consulted.


> Second, stop posting on Fairfax Underground until
> this suit is over. Nothing you could possibly
> post can help you. But you have no idea how
> things you might post might hurt you.


I know you want me off the site, and I know that it pains you that I have never been banned, but try harder with the pseudo-advice.


> Third, as wonderful a person as Lizzy might be (I
> offer neither an endorsement nor a commendation of
> her), you might not want to show up with her in
> court.


She has no part in this suit, she was there to take care of something.


If you want her to be a witness for you,
> she might not be permitted to testify on your
> behalf if she has been prejudiced by viewing prior
> proceedings.


You mean......she could be impeached as a witness? Is that what you are attempting to say?


And she DOES have pending felony
> charges against her (although, from what I can
> tell, those charges might well be bogus).
>
> More later...


...and that has no relation to this suit. Somehow that escapes you.




So, the gist from this is, you wrote a lot of bullshit, you clearly weren't listening. You were more interested in taking note of what I was wearing than actually listening to the motion. You also want me off the site and want me to stop associating with lizzie. Basically, you are threatened by our presence on the site, but not threatened enough to sit by us in person.

Double post!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/13/2015 11:55PM by eesh.

Thanks again OP for the precise, and accurate information!

Hello, I'm eesh's paranoia and I've gone through the roof. I'm being sued and everyone is out to get me. I will never stop posting on ffxu. Without ffxu I am nothing. Meanwhile, don't entertain yourselves too much with my misery. It makes me go bonkers.

"He intentionally timed this perfectly as my grandfather is on his deathbed in another state"

How could eesh have known this?

not only does no one believe him, he has no proof

also he has no idea who the op was, so that is eating away at him

> Were you giving some thought to jumping into the
> Potomac and ending all this? I would suggest the
> WW Bridge. You'll get TV coverage and stop traffic
> for 50 miles.

eesh paranoia Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hello, I'm eesh's paranoia and I've gone through
> the roof. I'm being sued and everyone is out to
> get me. I will never stop posting on ffxu. Without
> ffxu I am nothing. Meanwhile, don't entertain
> yourselves too much with my misery. It makes me go
> bonkers.


+1


Are we just the same posters though!??

According to eesh I'm sure I'm just replying to my own post now!

LLOL so true! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh paranoia Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Hello, I'm eesh's paranoia and I've gone
> through
> > the roof. I'm being sued and everyone is out to
> > get me. I will never stop posting on ffxu.
> Without
> > ffxu I am nothing. Meanwhile, don't entertain
> > yourselves too much with my misery. It makes me
> go
> > bonkers.
>
>
> +1
>
>
> Are we just the same posters though!??
>
> According to eesh I'm sure I'm just replying to my
> own post now!


yes, we are the same poster according to eesh or any other hated ffu poster

Look at the bright side. At least eesh finally belongs in Fairfax like the rest of us. Even if it is in the court system.

Eh, I like Alexandria a lot better. Now if they could just do something about those annoying buskers that take up sidewalk space. They can't sing, can't play their instrument of choice, just GTFO the narrow sidewalk.

fourlegs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh, I seriously doubt this guy is the lamb
> center troll. You're simply trying to undermine
> the credibility of our only source of information
> on your case.

BINGO!

eesh, the "playing it off" does not work on a message board
go post some more mundane shit in other threads to pretend you do not care

OP is the guy he is saying he mistook for Misery

CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> SURELY you can find a First Amendment attorney
> (ACLU, perhaps?) who would do it for free. This
> is a significant case that could have implications
> far beyond FFX Underground...


Nah. With all respect, there's nothing in this case that has any First Amendment interest or significance.

To the extent the suit alleges publication of tortious language, the claims are aimed at language that is either clearly outside the scope of First Amendment protection, or falls within a category where the relevant legal principles are well-defined, and the only issue is the proper application of those principles.

That said, the lawsuit may present eesh with the possibility for breaking new ground on the tactical front, by introducing Fairfax Underground-style arguments into the courtroom.

Thus, when Mr. Leiser rattles off a litany of seemingly damning facts, eesh need merely reach for an appropriate 4'x3' placard, and display it for the jury with a knowing smile.

Perhaps this for starters:



And when he really needs to lower the boom, there's always this:



As for stalking, the buck stops here.



For his closing argument, eesh can simply direct the
attention of the jury to the unseemly length of Mr.
Leiser's hair, roll his eyes, and say, "You are a
fucking creepy old man that enjoys hanging out in
courtrooms. Watch a soap opera or something. Your
argument is retarded. We both know you're just
making shit up. WTF is wrong with you? I rest my
case."


@ CourthouseObserver, IMPORTANT: DO *NOT* open any "private message" (or "pm") you may receive via your FU account from *anybody*, but especially not anything sent by eesh.

Eesh has openly boasted of using a phishing technique (a web bug triggered by opening a pm) to "out" the identity of registered user Gerrymanderer2.

I want to LMAO, but wow...these stupid mother fuckers and their self inflated sense of self importance, WOW.

I can't imagine how empty ones life must be, when life resorts to this kind of junior high bull shit. This dude is a fucking joke, a small pricked, over inked, curly headed fucktard. The company he keeps also speaks volumes, you know, birds of a feather and all that. . .I am almost curious as to what went so badly wrong in their lives where this is what makes them feel good.

It's like on homogeneous ball of fucktards:Eesh/mo-Lizzie/Megan/Caan/Mis/Stab/the other"100"posters". . .

Grow up, you fucking bumbs!

There is a wonderful world out there, that isn't on a computer. Go try it!

your fucking lucky I didn't know you were in town .....btw, I wonder if daddy knows of the trouble he has got himself into this time...I would bet not

Here is the most important FACT that exists in this case:

Eesh believes that ffu is more reality than the real world.

I am looking forward, maybe it will take a year or two, when Miz gets to come back here and post for months detailing the entire case. Eesh will likely escape any jail time, but will owe lets say around $100,000 to the miz family. He will be paying this a little at a time from any employment in the future.

What great revenge having eesh reminded every paycheck that he failed in life and the cause were his actions here on ffu,

lizzie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Okay brotha. That's fine and all seeing as how
> eesh isn't stupid and hasn't told me anything at
> all..
>
>
> ...oooooo
>
>
> .
>
> ..


That was a lie.

CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> To Eesh....
>
> I hope this is my last message to you...
>
> Why are you so angry at me? And why are you
> resorting to name calling?
>
> I don't know if I stuck out like a sore thumb or
> not; clearly, given the name you have made up in
> an attempt to denigrate me, I am not who you think
> I was. But I could care less if you or anyone
> else knows who I am. I have a right to be in any
> courtroom I want. I don't have to sneak around to
> do it. And I am well-known enough in the legal
> community that 90 percent of the people in the
> courtroom know me and I know them.
>
> Dude... The court will see this website. You are
> in trouble. When in a hole, stop digging, for
> heaven's sake.
>
> Again, I am not your enemy. I don't understand
> why you insist on treating me that way.
>
> Good luck... And get some legal representation!


You stole his thunder and his chance to write history the way he wants it repeated. Not the way it actually occurred. He still thinks he's in control.

get out Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Get out of our beloved county you degenerate.


He can't. That's why he's in this mess to start with. Just couldn't leave it on the internet. He had to travel many miles to dick with someone that no one gives a damn about. It's a disease.

When is Mo-Mo's hearing? We need a good reporter to ask Katie whether she got any new tats or piercings since Mo-Mo was kicked out of her bed. If OP is a regular at the court house, he might be able to get a camera phone in and take some pics of what Katie wears to court.

Cy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> When is Mo-Mo's hearing? We need a good reporter
> to ask Katie whether she got any new tats or
> piercings since Mo-Mo was kicked out of her bed.
> If OP is a regular at the court house, he might be
> able to get a camera phone in and take some pics
> of what Katie wears to court.


That would be considered harrassment

Okay..No Pics. But OP could report on what Katie was wearing and whether she even shows up.

Cy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Okay..No Pics. But OP could report on what Katie
> was wearing and whether she even shows up.


Still harrassment. Leave that girl alone.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> popcorn in microwave Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > " Instead, contended that he had not been
> properly
> > served and asked the judge to quash service."
> >
> >
> > LOL!
> >
> > Did the lawyer point out eesh was dumb enough
> to
> > post the documents on FFXU after he was
> served?
>
>
>
> Actually, I had a reason for posting those
> documents, and it worked out well in the end.

I will point out that you have a lawyer counseling you to not post here. The same person stated you were admonished by a judge for trying to represent yourself. Yet you persist on posting. You aren't impressing anyone.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> So, the gist from this is, you wrote a lot of
> bullshit, you clearly weren't listening. You were
> more interested in taking note of what I was
> wearing than actually listening to the motion.
> You also want me off the site and want me to stop
> associating with lizzie. Basically, you are
> threatened by our presence on the site, but not
> threatened enough to sit by us in person.

You're a one trick horse, eesh. The entire cadre of readers saw your response coming before you finished. Contradict the message, insult the messenger, reassert your confidence and omniscience. I am sure you are working to find the identity of the person to further underscore what you will portend is malicious intent.

But none of us are stupid enough to believe your version of the events. And while you may emerge from this trial innocent, you won't emerge unscathed. But keep telling yourself otherwise. It's what +we+ think of you that matters more than what you write about yourself.

Op is fucking awesome, eesh! I think he was one of the Ediots trolling megan. How can you hate on him for wanting to see what happened and let us know? I would have gone if I had time off. It would have been really hard to keep from staring, and misery not appearing would have been a big disappointment, but helped a bit by the Lizzie cameo

so the op is an old guy with long hair, think's he is a lawyer and wakes up at six am for the early bird special

who does that sound like?

You're right. Eesh is a one trick pony. His manner and response seems so bland and predictable. He's the perfect uniform troll but a loser at everything else.

Seeing him try to deal with reality scared shitless yet trying exude confidence is entertaining to watch though.

Cy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> If OP is a regular at the court house, he might be
> able to get a camera phone in and take some pics
> of what Katie wears to court.


I can get you pictures of Katie anytime you want them.

Sorry ..Only want to know whatshe wears to court. It might be an orange jump suit, if half of what Mo-Mo posted is true.

You gotta admit that eesh and Mo-Mo were looking good yesterday. They were dressed up respectfully. Smart real Smart.

i know who it was Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> so the op is an old guy with long hair, think's he
> is a lawyer and wakes up at six am for the early
> bird special
>
> who does that sound like?

Gerry Connolly?

i know who it was Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> so the op is an old guy with long hair, think's he
> is a lawyer and wakes up at six am for the early
> bird special




LOL He went from being a courtroom reporter to a lawyer* within a few posts. A few more posts, and he'll be a General District judge; by the end of the thread, he'll be a presiding judge at the International Court of Justice.



* A lawyer that doesn't know the difference between summary and default judgement.

Is Eesh coming off as butt hurt or is it just me?

lol hes butthurt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Is Eesh coming off as butt hurt or is it just me?




I think the only persons butthurt are the ones angry that I'm not stressing out about a frivolous suit, or taking an e-lawyer seriously. I'll leave you to your frothing at the mouth.

Eesh let me summerize in basic terms that you understand what the judge said to you.

You got some nerve with no lawyer. You're an idiot for not having a lawyer. You got ten days to play ball and lawyer up or that's your ass.

Do we understand each other bitch? Now get the fuck out.

What's more important to eesh is trying to find out who OP is and take away his credibility.


That lawyer stuff will maybe come later, his FFXU rep is more important.

eesh's legal defense Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh let me summerize in basic terms that you
> understand what the judge said to you.
>
> You got some nerve with no lawyer. You're an idiot
> for not having a lawyer. You got ten days to play
> ball and lawyer up or that's your ass.
>
> Do we understand each other bitch? Now get the
> fuck out.



That's not what was said...

Oh Eesh, if you weren't such a paranoid evil short dickhead one might actually feel sympathy for you.

Cy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sorry ..Only want to know whatshe wears to court.
> It might be an orange jump suit, if half of what
> Mo-Mo posted is true.


I don't think Fairfax uses orange

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> i know who it was Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>
> LOL He went from being a courtroom reporter to a
> lawyer* within a few posts. A few more posts, and
> he'll be a General District judge; by the end of
> the thread, he'll be a presiding judge at the
> International Court of Justice.
>

And you'll still be in court on an Internet stalking charge. Backstopped by a reputation of being a dolt and troll.

It pays to be a winner.

lol hes butthurt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Is Eesh coming off as butt hurt or is it just me?


Rectum is swollen.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> lol hes butthurt Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> I think the only persons butthurt are the ones
> angry that I'm not stressing out about a frivolous
> suit, or taking an e-lawyer seriously. I'll leave
> you to your frothing at the mouth.

I'm sure you are just thrilled to be facing charges in Fairfax Court and driving from Henrico County each time. Meanwhile trying to represent yourself when you lack the intelligence quotient to do so.

You aren't fooling anyone. Have a great day.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh's legal defense Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Eesh let me summerize in basic terms that you
> > understand what the judge said to you.
> >
> > You got some nerve with no lawyer. You're an
> idiot
> > for not having a lawyer. You got ten days to
> play
> > ball and lawyer up or that's your ass.
> >
> > Do we understand each other bitch? Now get the
> > fuck out.
>
> That's not what was said...

Stenographer there? I'm sure we can get a transcript in a few weeks or so.

Durf212385938182884748 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > eesh Wrote:
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > I think the only persons butthurt are the ones
> > angry that I'm not stressing out about a frivolous
> > suit, or taking an e-lawyer seriously. I'll leave
> > you to your frothing at the mouth.
>
> I'm sure you are just thrilled to be facing
> charges in Fairfax Court and driving from Henrico
> County each time. Meanwhile trying to represent
> yourself when you lack the intelligence quotient
> to do so.
>
> You aren't fooling anyone. Have a great day.


Reaffirmed, again, for anyone who doubted that:

The power of clear statement is
the great power at the bar.*

Durf212385938182884748 wins.

And eesh, well, he may be fronting [insert picture of happy person]

but inside he be like all



* I refer, of course, to the remark of Daniel Webster, whose life and practice eesh might now, after long delay, profitably study.

Pic unrelated.
Attachments:

I think a certain troll needs to look up the difference between criminal and civil trials....and when they get their ADHD under control, read the pleadings posted in off-topic. Nowhere in the suit does it say anything about cyberbullying or internet stalking.


Matter of fact, there is a permanently banned poster that is currently facing computer harassment charges down in Henrico County, but we won't talk about that out of decency.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/14/2015 02:47PM by eesh.

Pretty sure he's not preoccupied with that bogus computer harrassment charge. He mays sue the shirt off your back though.

The Fairfax (U'd) Assessment Bd Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ...but inside he be like all

    


No, idiot.

Inside he "be like":

CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I had a couple of hour-long break in my schedule
> this morning, and so I decided to drop into
> Fairfax County Circuit Courtroom 4F to observe as
> much as I could of today's proceedings in the case
> of Misery v. Eesh.
>
> My Bottom-Line take on the situation is that Eesh
> is in a lot of trouble here.
>
> First, the atmospherics...
>
> The court was entertaining pretrial and
> interlocutory motions, rather than conducting
> trials and so, for the most part, those present in
> and addressing the court were attorneys for
> plaintiffs and defendants who were arguing their
> motions before the court.
>
> Eesh was there, accompanied by Lizzy, and they sat
> together in the back row until their case was
> called.
>
> Eesh was smartly dressed, with well-pressed Khaki
> pants, a blue blazer, a dress shirt and tie. Lizzy
> was conservatively dressed in black in what
> appeared to be business attire and running shoes.
> While Lizzy sat beside him for much of the time
> that the court was in session, she left the
> courtroom occasionally (to make phone calls, I
> believe) and returned each time. Indeed, she
> actually was out of the courtroom when the Misery
> v. Eesh case was called before the judge and
> missed most of the proceedings.
>
> Someone who I assumed was Misery was there, as
> well, sitting by himself dressed much more
> casually.
>
> Misery's attorney was unconventional in his
> appearance, in that he had long, flowing hair and
> a good amount of facial hair. But he was
> professionally dressed in a dark suit, dress
> shirt, tie, and pocket square, and he comported
> himself well professionally during and after the
> proceedings.
>
> The biggest surprise for me, though, was that Eesh
> was appearing pro Se, which (for the few FFX
> Underground users who are not attorneys) means he
> was without counsel.
>
> The purpose of today's proceedings was for the
> court to hear arguments and rule on a motion by
> Eesh's attorney for summary judgement in the case.
> As best as I can understand it (I did not speak
> to any of the parties after the proceedings to
> confirm this), the motion was predicated on the
> fact that Eesh did not file a response to the suit
> within the time period required by law and still
> had not filed a response. As a general matter,
> when this occurs, a plantiff (the charging party)
> will ask the court to enter a summary judgement
> against the defendant (the person who is being
> sued) and in favor of the plaintiff.
>
> Eesh's "defense" to the motion for summary
> judgement was to file a motion of his own, asking
> the judge to quash service (ask the judge to rule
> that he, the defendant, had not been properly
> served or given notice of the suit and/or not
> given proper notice of the motions filed by the
> plaintiff).
>
>
> Misery's attorney presented a compelling case in
> favor of his motion for summary judgement,
> asserting that the suit and notice had been
> properly served by the Sheriff, offering the court
> proof of the same, and asserting that Eesh had not
> responded to the suit in the proper timeframe. He
> asked that, in the alternative, if the judge
> declined to make a summary judgement in favor of
> Misery, that she award Misery $1,900 in attorneys
> fees and costs that had been incurred so far to
> research, prepared, file, and argue the motions
> and that said fees and costs be paid as a
> precondition to allowing Eesh to continue in the
> case without summary judgement.
>
> Appearing on his own behalf, Eesh offered no
> defense to not having responded to the suit.
> Instead, contended that he had not been properly
> served and asked the judge to quash service.
>
> The judge agreed with Misery's attorney that
> service had been properly made; that Eesh had not
> responded at all, let alone within the timeframes
> required by law; and that grounds were there for
> summary judgement. She indicated however, that
> she was reluctant to do so in this instance at
> this time, in part because Eesh was appearing Pro
> Se. She castigated Eesh for not responding to the
> suit, as well as for his motion to quash service
> -- both on the merits of the motion and for his
> failure to properly file it.
>
> Eesh appeared confused about the legalities of the
> situation he is in and of what he needs to do in
> order to defend himself, saying several times that
> he has no legal training; that he is attending
> school on the GI Bill and has no money for
> attorneys; and that he had consulted an attorney
> who wanted $10,000 from him to take the case,
> which he did not have.
>
> The judge was having none of it.
>
> She told him that he was gambling by not having
> counsel and that, at the very least, he needs to
> talk with one. She quizzed him on several aspects
> of court procedure. He was unable to
> satisfactorily answer her.
>
> In the end, she cut him a MAJOR break.
>
> She denied both the motion for summary judgement
> and the motion to quash service. However, she
> gave Eesh ten days to either respond to the suit
> or properly file a motion to quash service,
> whichever he chose to do. On the request by
> Misery's attorney for attorneys fees, she denied
> that request without prejudice, saying that the
> attorney could bring that up again at the
> appropriate time.
>
> Eesh is in trouble.
>
> My free legal advice to him is ...
>
> First, get an attorney. If you cannot afford one,
> SURELY you can find a First Amendment attorney
> (ACLU, perhaps?) who would do it for free. This
> is a significant case that could have implications
> far beyond FFX Underground, and I am sure that
> there are attorneys and organizations out there
> who, notwithstanding his bad behavior, would take
> on this case. Misery's attorney is good. You
> have little hope of prevailing if you are not
> represented, as well.
>
> Second, stop posting on Fairfax Underground until
> this suit is over. Nothing you could possibly
> post can help you. But you have no idea how
> things you might post might hurt you.
>
> Third, as wonderful a person as Lizzy might be (I
> offer neither an endorsement nor a commendation of
> her), you might not want to show up with her in
> court. If you want her to be a witness for you,
> she might not be permitted to testify on your
> behalf if she has been prejudiced by viewing prior
> proceedings. And she DOES have pending felony
> charges against her (although, from what I can
> tell, those charges might well be bogus).
>
> More later...
Attachments:

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nowhere in the suit does it say anything about
> cyberbullying or internet stalking.

Cyberbullying and internet (and real-life) stalking are mentioned numerous times.

You miss that somehow?

Eyes wide shut is only a movie. It's no way to go through life, son.

Why was eesh never arrested for all this? Doesn't an arrest come before a lawsuit?