CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I had a couple of hour-long break in my schedule
> this morning, and so I decided to drop into
> Fairfax County Circuit Courtroom 4F to observe as
> much as I could of today's proceedings in the case
> of Misery v. Eesh.
>
> My Bottom-Line take on the situation is that Eesh
> is in a lot of trouble here.
>
> First, the atmospherics...
>
> The court was entertaining pretrial and
> interlocutory motions, rather than conducting
> trials and so, for the most part, those present in
> and addressing the court were attorneys for
> plaintiffs and defendants who were arguing their
> motions before the court.
>
> Eesh was there, accompanied by Lizzy, and they sat
> together in the back row until their case was
> called.
>
> Eesh was smartly dressed, with well-pressed Khaki
> pants, a blue blazer, a dress shirt and tie. Lizzy
> was conservatively dressed in black in what
> appeared to be business attire and running shoes.
> While Lizzy sat beside him for much of the time
> that the court was in session, she left the
> courtroom occasionally (to make phone calls, I
> believe) and returned each time. Indeed, she
> actually was out of the courtroom when the Misery
> v. Eesh case was called before the judge and
> missed most of the proceedings.
>
> Someone who I assumed was Misery was there, as
> well, sitting by himself dressed much more
> casually.
>
> Misery's attorney was unconventional in his
> appearance, in that he had long, flowing hair and
> a good amount of facial hair. But he was
> professionally dressed in a dark suit, dress
> shirt, tie, and pocket square, and he comported
> himself well professionally during and after the
> proceedings.
>
> The biggest surprise for me, though, was that Eesh
> was appearing pro Se, which (for the few FFX
> Underground users who are not attorneys) means he
> was without counsel.
>
> The purpose of today's proceedings was for the
> court to hear arguments and rule on a motion by
> Eesh's attorney for summary judgement in the case.
> As best as I can understand it (I did not speak
> to any of the parties after the proceedings to
> confirm this), the motion was predicated on the
> fact that Eesh did not file a response to the suit
> within the time period required by law and still
> had not filed a response. As a general matter,
> when this occurs, a plantiff (the charging party)
> will ask the court to enter a summary judgement
> against the defendant (the person who is being
> sued) and in favor of the plaintiff.
>
> Eesh's "defense" to the motion for summary
> judgement was to file a motion of his own, asking
> the judge to quash service (ask the judge to rule
> that he, the defendant, had not been properly
> served or given notice of the suit and/or not
> given proper notice of the motions filed by the
> plaintiff).
>
>
> Misery's attorney presented a compelling case in
> favor of his motion for summary judgement,
> asserting that the suit and notice had been
> properly served by the Sheriff, offering the court
> proof of the same, and asserting that Eesh had not
> responded to the suit in the proper timeframe. He
> asked that, in the alternative, if the judge
> declined to make a summary judgement in favor of
> Misery, that she award Misery $1,900 in attorneys
> fees and costs that had been incurred so far to
> research, prepared, file, and argue the motions
> and that said fees and costs be paid as a
> precondition to allowing Eesh to continue in the
> case without summary judgement.
>
> Appearing on his own behalf, Eesh offered no
> defense to not having responded to the suit.
> Instead, contended that he had not been properly
> served and asked the judge to quash service.
>
> The judge agreed with Misery's attorney that
> service had been properly made; that Eesh had not
> responded at all, let alone within the timeframes
> required by law; and that grounds were there for
> summary judgement. She indicated however, that
> she was reluctant to do so in this instance at
> this time, in part because Eesh was appearing Pro
> Se. She castigated Eesh for not responding to the
> suit, as well as for his motion to quash service
> -- both on the merits of the motion and for his
> failure to properly file it.
>
> Eesh appeared confused about the legalities of the
> situation he is in and of what he needs to do in
> order to defend himself, saying several times that
> he has no legal training; that he is attending
> school on the GI Bill and has no money for
> attorneys; and that he had consulted an attorney
> who wanted $10,000 from him to take the case,
> which he did not have.
>
> The judge was having none of it.
>
> She told him that he was gambling by not having
> counsel and that, at the very least, he needs to
> talk with one. She quizzed him on several aspects
> of court procedure. He was unable to
> satisfactorily answer her.
>
> In the end, she cut him a MAJOR break.
>
> She denied both the motion for summary judgement
> and the motion to quash service. However, she
> gave Eesh ten days to either respond to the suit
> or properly file a motion to quash service,
> whichever he chose to do. On the request by
> Misery's attorney for attorneys fees, she denied
> that request without prejudice, saying that the
> attorney could bring that up again at the
> appropriate time.
>
> Eesh is in trouble.
>
> My free legal advice to him is ...
>
> First, get an attorney. If you cannot afford one,
> SURELY you can find a First Amendment attorney
> (ACLU, perhaps?) who would do it for free. This
> is a significant case that could have implications
> far beyond FFX Underground, and I am sure that
> there are attorneys and organizations out there
> who, notwithstanding his bad behavior, would take
> on this case. Misery's attorney is good. You
> have little hope of prevailing if you are not
> represented, as well.
>
> Second, stop posting on Fairfax Underground until
> this suit is over. Nothing you could possibly
> post can help you. But you have no idea how
> things you might post might hurt you.
>
> Third, as wonderful a person as Lizzy might be (I
> offer neither an endorsement nor a commendation of
> her), you might not want to show up with her in
> court. If you want her to be a witness for you,
> she might not be permitted to testify on your
> behalf if she has been prejudiced by viewing prior
> proceedings. And she DOES have pending felony
> charges against her (although, from what I can
> tell, those charges might well be bogus).
>
> More later...


TL;DR

^ strategic post by eesh to avoid having something embarrassing posted about him at the top of page 4.

?? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> who the hell is betterthanyoubitch?


http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/886890.html
Attachments:

Pop Quiz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> @ Cary
>
> There's a very interesting exception to the
> otherwise extensive protection provided by section
> 230.
>
> Do you recall what it is?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ...I do.
>
>



Psssst.

Don't tell Cary about this post.

If he sees it, he might wise up and stop cooperating.

Miz needs to post under one name ^^^^^^^^

___________________________________________________________
“Imitation is suicide.”
-Ralph Waldo Emerson

How come the cat picture showed up in the quote? That never happens.
Unless it is the same person who posted it in the first place.

Chesire cats have a way of doing that!

Yourgay Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How come the cat picture showed up in the quote?
> That never happens.
> Unless it is the same person who posted it in the
> first place.


They do when it's done inline and the URL doesn't get broken across lines in the quote.

fourlegs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Miz needs to post under one name ^^^^^^^^

Conspiracy Failz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> They do when it's done inline and the URL doesn't
> get broken across lines in the quote.


That which can be broken must be broken.

   



                                     

                                    HENRICO'S FINEST MAGISTRATE
                                   (scratching not-recently-shaved chin)
              Hmmmm...  Let's see here.

              On the one hand, we've got some 1,300 posts by "eesh" harassing
              Meade Skelton, and on 'tother, we've got -- what was that number
              again, Mike?  Ah, yes.

              And on 'tother, we've got 22 posts that criticize "eesh" for stalking
              and other "sociopathic" activities which he admitted, and indeed
              boasted of engaging in.

              --Eh, what?  Oh, yes!  I almost forgot!  And, in addition, one animated
              gift.  Eh, what's that?  Gif..?!  Is that how you say it, Mike?

                                                       (shakes head)
              Hmmph.  Funny word.  Never heard of such a thing.

              Anywho, one animated... gif... that purports to show Mr. Basl engaged
              in a lewd and/or obscene dance.  ...Turrible... just turrible...

              Which posts Mr. Basl is convinced were made by Meade Skelton,
              although none of the posts was actually known to have been made
              by that scoundrel, er, I mean by or under the name of Mr. Skelton.

              Given the overwhelming abundance of evidence of Mr. Skelton's
              harassment of Mr. Basl, I conclude that the scales of justice tilt heavily in
              favor of Mr. Basl, and find probable cause to arrest Meade Skelton for
              harassing an innocent citizen of this Commonwealth.

              ...There!

He signs the warrant with a flourish, hands it to Basl.

                                    HENRICO'S FINEST MAGISTRATE
              Good luck catching this scoundrel, Mike.  It's just turrible the way he's
              been harassing you!

                                                           "EESH"
              Oh, thank you, your Honor! You can't imagine the terrible stress I've
              been under as a result of this campaign of harassment.  Indeed, I'm
              in fear of my life!
                                      

I know some niggas who would like to tear that white ass up!




It's the only way eesh will be able to make money without having it garnished, LOL!

Where eesh at? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dude, I axed you a question!
>
> What was the name of the judge who gave you ten
> days to file a new motion or an answer?
>
> ANSWER THE QUESTION.

Nostradamus Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Xxh7Y Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ?? Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > who the hell is betterthanyoubitch?
> >
> >
> >
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/88
>
> > 6890.html
>
>
> Another fine example of a female who was asking
> for it, by taking nude photographs and then tried
> to play the victim role when her name and face
> were connected to them.



Ah yes, BTYB. She posted her cell phone number and pic on 4LULZ, and was outed shortly afterwards.


A reasonable person could look at her outing and subsequent running off the site and ask "who would do such a thing?"

I'm always amazed at the talent of many posters to put together some fine arts. I'm computer illiterate. And an idiot.

Why bother going to school at this point, you will never be able to get a decent paying job. Move to Florida and pick tomatoes for 2 cents per pound, that's just about the only employment you will ever be able to get. Even gas station applicants get googled these days. LMAO you are screwed, the cherry on top is the shoplifting charge. Granted it was thrown out it is never really thrown out and prospective employers don't hire thieves. Any job application you fill out will be a waste of ink and will end up in the trash can.

This might be a good thread to post this in as there seem to be some posters with legal experience here.


Does anyone have experience with the Witness Assistance Program and VINE? Seems like a good program, I might check it out. VINE looks especially helpful.


#refusingtobeavictim #helpisoutthere #justice

Durf633636173(4728 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> @eesh
> --------------------------------------------------
> what exactly is it you do other than stalk
> people on FFXU? You are some sort of professional
> community college student?



Hilar

You're doing too much eesh

Both Misery and Lizzie strike me as very poor at anticipating consequences. They are also the ones that get arrested. I think eesh will come out on top.

DanoWells Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Both Misery and Lizzie strike me as very poor at
> anticipating consequences. They are also the ones
> that get arrested. I think eesh will come out on
> top.



They should all be committed to a mental hospital...permanently.

lizzie is a good person. She may have made some mistakes in the past, but I believe that she means well and strives for a better world. She has a lot to offer the world; I hope and pray that everything works out well for her.


Credibility (as mentioned often in this thread) is everything in criminal proceedings, and I believe lizzie will get out of her recent troubles because her accuser is so discreditable.

As in the computer harassment case in Henrico, when I take the witness stand with my clean record (no criminal convictions!), I can be confidant that I will be seen as a credible witness.

Arent you a petty shop lifter?

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> As in the computer harassment case in Henrico,
> when I take the witness stand with my clean record
> (no criminal convictions!)


Theft is a crime = you are criminal

There seems to be some concern about whether or not I have a criminal record. As someone that recently renewed his Virginia concealed carry permit, and obtained a Utah concealed firearm permit and Florida concealed weapon license, I can put any concerns to rest. You can't have these permits and licenses with a felony record or a misdemeanor conviction (within the past three years.)

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There seems to be some concern about whether or
> not I have a criminal record. As someone that
> recently renewed his Virginia concealed carry
> permit, and obtained a Utah concealed firearm
> permit and Florida concealed weapon license, I can
> put any concerns to rest. You can't have these
> permits and licenses with a felony record or a
> misdemeanor conviction (within the past three
> years.)


so is the new date in April?

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There seems to be some concern about whether or
> not I have a criminal record. As someone that
> recently renewed his Virginia concealed carry
> permit, and obtained a Utah concealed firearm
> permit and Florida concealed weapon license, I can
> put any concerns to rest. You can't have these
> permits and licenses with a felony record or a
> misdemeanor conviction (within the past three
> years.)


Question- why do you feel the need to validate yourself to anyone associated with this cesspool?

You disclose way too much personal information on here. I know you aren't a teenager but you sure act like one.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This might be a good thread to post this in as
> there seem to be some posters with legal
> experience here.
>
>
> Does anyone have experience with the Witness
> Assistance Program and VINE? Seems like a good
> program, I might check it out. VINE looks
> especially helpful.
>
>
> #refusingtobeavictim #helpisoutthere #justice
>
> src="http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.
> php?40,file=179326,filename=1.jpg">
>
>
> src="http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.
> php?40,file=179327,filename=Scan0002.jpg">
>
>
> src="http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.
> php?40,file=179328,filename=3.jpg">

Well yeah, that lets everyone know just how serious you are about the threat.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There seems to be some concern about whether or
> not I have a criminal record. As someone that
> recently renewed his Virginia concealed carry
> permit, and obtained a Utah concealed firearm
> permit and Florida concealed weapon license, I can
> put any concerns to rest. You can't have these
> permits and licenses with a felony record or a
> misdemeanor conviction (within the past three
> years.)

Does that make you gunnuts feel good? Maybe now you know how the rest of us feel.

dumbass... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Well yeah, that lets everyone know just how
> serious you are about the threat.



I'm taking it quite seriously. Please let me know if you have any experience with the Witness Assistance Program. Are the advocates helpful at trial? Is VINE timely and accurate? Let me know.


-thanks

- Petit Larceny
X Eluding Police
X Reckless Driving

Now I suppose it all comes down to your own personal definition of "criminal". I forget if we include misdemeanors, or if it's only felonies and up around here. People do get shat on pretty hard in the threads when seeking advice for beating a speeding and/or reckless driving ticket to avoid a license suspension. There are 3 degrees of Eluding Police in VA; 1 misdemeanor, the other 2 felonies.


I don't see three-years mentioned anywhere in there, but I do see five-years, which works out pretty well with the timing of it all. Sounds more like a fresh CCW permit application, rather than a renewal.

§ 18.2-308.09. Disqualifications for a concealed handgun permit:
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+18.2-308.09
Attachments:

Go play in traffic and you won't have to worry about any of this.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> lizzie is a good person. She may have made some
> mistakes in the past, but I believe that she means
> well and strives for a better world. She has a
> lot to offer the world; I hope and pray that
> everything works out well for her.

Thanks eesh..even though it was you who tried to make me out to be such a horrible person all these years lol. I'm big enough to let that go.

Sure, I've made mistakes and don't some illegal things but I'm not ashamed to admit I'm a person with issues and living with mental illness. Pretty much every time I've been arrested was because I wasn't taking care of myself and thinking I had overcome my issues. With this most recent thing I've learned that I haven't and am seeking help.

Everyone wants to say I'm a criminal, a nigger, worthless and useless to society but that shows how you people have no idea what I do in this community other than what you see me post here. No one ever talks about the time I risked my life and stopped rush hour traffic on Jermantown Road to help a family of geese cross the road. People were taking videos, cheering and clapping, it was great. You don't know I volunteer to help out homeless people and give them hope and actually just take the time out to sit and listen to them talk, acknowledge their existence, take their advice and try to learn from their mistakes.

No one has ever seen a single post of someone I know personally come here and say "OMG I KNOW THAT GIRL AND SHE DOES THIS THAT AND THAT" why? Because I am a totally different person offline than I am online, unless I'm suffering through my psychosis as I was recently.



They make fun of me for having compassion, a heart and the patience to go help as a caregiver for adults with developmental disabilities and try to better myself and my life and learn some valuable skills for a future career.





They think all I do is sit here and troll all day and have and never will do anything with my life but I have and will. Life has ups and downs and I have seen my fair share but I ALWAYS get back up after being knocked down.



My trolls think they know me based on what I post here or some criminal record that I have never let stop me from trying in life but those in our community who actually know me, know I'm not a bad person. I'm troubled but I do still try to keep the peace and make people smile.




I'm going to continue to grow and learn and reach for my goals and live my dream of helping others. Make fun of me for living with my parents, so what? There are many people older than me living with theirs too - at least I'm not struggling to make it out there or out there stealing from people or robbing and hurting anyone. Make fun of me for working in fast food, it's better than still selling weed or again - robbing and hurting others for money and I am still going to school to learn more and I am SO thankful to have a family who loves me enough to put up with my shit. I am truly blessed and lucky. Where would I be if they didn't? Uh, probably out of the street truly being a menace to society and robbing people, hurting them and actually being a "career criminal" to survive.

Troll me all you'd like, it says a lot more about you than it does me to make fun of someone with obvious mental issues who actually has been trying and will continue to try to right my wrongs in life!

You say I have no life and stay here all day and night well I sure think that's a lot better than having me out on the street committing crimes, now isn't it?!

> Credibility (as mentioned often in this thread) is
> everything in criminal proceedings, and I believe
> lizzie will get out of her recent troubles because
> her accuser is so discreditable.

Even she knows that I make people happy. You rarely ever see me without a smile on my face and anyone who's near me without one either.




People here have told me that I should "off myself" but I can't and won't. Sorry! I have so much life left to live and so much to live for. Life is precious and it's short enough as it is. I always have a smile on my face no matter what's going on because I have hope and know that things always do get better!

And people always trip out about how I always "get away with crimes" I don't get away with shit. I've done my time. It's the fact that my crimes don't match my character at all and even the police know this. The things I've done are usually random and out of the ordinary. You may take what I post here as who I am but do the things you all post here match who you are? I surely hope not lol. This website is an outlet for me and I would hope most people here are NOT like the persona they portray here.


Before you troll me again - ask yourself, have I ever gone out of my way to save animals, help those with special needs or worked with children? Have I made someone smile today? What does trolling lizzie really do for my self esteem? Am I really BETTER than her and if I saw her in person would I be as bold in person to say all the things I say to her to her face?

I'm no angel and I'm not perfect. I've done and said some fucked up shit and have hurt people in my life but I am mature enough to accept my karma and deal with everything I've been handed in life but the universe ALWAYS balances everything out.

I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning



Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 03/16/2015 01:42AM by lizzie.
Attachments:

Traffic misdemeanors are not included as part of a criminal history. If that was the case, a huge chunk of Virginians would have criminal records as Virginia loves reckless driving charges and speed traps.



Even in the statute that you quote, §18.2-308.09, you will notice that paragraph 7 clearly states that traffic misdemeanors are not disqualifiers.


7. An individual who has been convicted of two or more misdemeanors within the five-year period immediately preceding the application, if one of the misdemeanors was a Class 1 misdemeanor, but the judge shall have the discretion to deny a permit for two or more misdemeanors that are not Class 1. Traffic infractions and misdemeanors set forth in Title 46.2 shall not be considered for purposes of this disqualification.




Thanks, please try again.

I stand corrected. Missed that 'not' in the last sentence. And with that I'll now say that I'm sure it was a CCW permit renewal as you said it was.

The rest is what it is. Speeding tickets are only Infractions, but RD above 80 and Eluding are high-level misdemeanors that show a wanton disregard for the safety of others.

Is there not something better we could be paying judges to do?

Lizzie, you may be telling the truth here. As a black person in a predominately white area one would think with your record you would have gotten the book thrown at you long ago. You do seem mentally ill but not someone I would label as "crazy". You seem quite intelligent and I don't think you receive the credit for the good things you have contributed in life. That said, you should probably continue to use that intelligence for good instead of getting mixed up in the bad. You have time to turn your life around and now is that time.

AllFacts Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I stand corrected. Missed that 'not' in the last
> sentence. And with that I'll now say that I'm
> sure it was a CCW permit renewal as you said it
> was.
>
> The rest is what it is. Speeding tickets are only
> Infractions, but RD above 80 and Eluding are
> high-level misdemeanors that show a wanton
> disregard for the safety of others.



It shows maturity on your part to accept defeat, good for you. In your lame effort to discredit a credible person with a clean record, you have grown and learned more about the law.


As far as "high-level misdemeanors", are you attempting to say Class 1 misdemeanor and Class 3 misdemeanor? Those were the charges...

I paid the $250 and $100 fine, and moved on. Perhaps you should do the same.


Fun fact! GEICO does not penalize people for attempted eluding and reckless driving. The actuaries at GEICO label those as speeding tickets. Yay!

concerned taxpayer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Is there not something better we could be paying
> judges to do?




At the initial stage, as long as you pay the filing fees, the courts don't care. Later on though, if you put a bunch of bullshit and lies in your claims, the courts will dismiss the suit and impose sanctions.


For example, let's say a pipe froze in your home in the middle of winter, burst open, and flooded your basement. You then decide to sue a random person with claims that they broke into your home to cause a flood. You will need to have a factual basis for your claim; if you are simply trying to harass an individual with a lawsuit, the courts will come down on you.

Another example, let's say you sue someone with the claim that your home was "swatted." Well, if the local police department swears up and down that no SWAT team was ever deployed to your home, well, if looks like you could be brought up on felony perjury charges along with damages awarded to the defendant.

Stay tuned....

@lizzie



You made good points. It's obvious from the angry, miserable people that call you racial slurs, that they are just trying to drag you down to their level.


I'm willing to bet that while you help and care for animals, the more malicious anonymous trolls in this thread probably take their misery out on animals. While you stop traffic to help animals cross the road, they probably run over animals for sport.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah, that's the thing. His parents are VERY aware
> of all the racist posts,

Racist posts? Examples, please.

Look up common racial slurs under his name that he posted, there is such an abundance of racial hatred, one could accurately call him racist.

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/776247/776247.html#msg-776247


The Mr. Misery name has written nigger "54 times"

He has used racial slurs to describe Asians, African-Americans, Jewish people, and Hispanics.


I wonder how many minorities will be on the jury?

Mr. Ed Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> You can lead a whore to water but you can't make
> her think..

writes a whore...

never met a man who wasn't one.

the facts of the case Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Yeah, that's the thing. His parents are VERY
> aware
> > of all the racist posts,
>
> Racist posts? Examples, please.

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/685118/685399.html#msg-685399

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/777708/778198.html#msg-778198

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/649932/649977.html#msg-649977

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He has used racial slurs to describe Asians,
> African-Americans, Jewish people, and Hispanics.
>
>
> I wonder how many minorities will be on the jury?


You should pray that the jury is all male, with histories of mental illness, given your posts describing your hate and obsessive desire to torture females.

A vury happi MLK day ta allyall whitefolk!
Posted by: Black Adam ()
Date: January 17, 2011 07:36AM

It sho iz mityfine nice dat da guvament give us dis here day offs in remberence of Dr. King. Jus las week I waz gettin my carpets cleaned by two whiteboyz from Stanleysteamers an I waz thinkin ta myselfs that I sho do wishes dat Martin Luther waz here ta see dis! I iz getti dres up here in a few min so I can goes down to da black baptist church in Manaszaz an I will say me sum prayerz fo all my friends here on da fairfaxes undergrounds.


Yours in Christ
Black Adam

^^^^That's eesh posting as "Black Adam", a racist, anti-black character he posted as for several years.

wonder if those are the same geese that hang out by the fair oaks pond

Eesh is clueless, he thinks these proceedings are going to be like ffxu. Where he'll simply troll misery and try to undermine and attack his character and the jury are going to be like ffxu readers. People that dont care and will pile on with the same run of the mill type attacks.

He believes hes going to call him a racist and he wins lol. This isnt ffxu and you better wise up boy. You're in the real world now.

Hahahaha Lizzie is like "I helped ducks this one time, I can do what I want!"

Maybe you should have some compassion for Megan toohey, or does she not get second (fifth, tenth, whatever) chances like you do? I mean after all those charges, if she's still free she must be doing great things for her community, by your logic.

I get that you're mentally ill, but I still think you're a bad person. I don't value you as an intelligent being enough to read the long paragraphs you wrote but I'm glad you haven't killed yourself yet.

A criminal is a criminal no matter how many charges. 1, 2 or 10!

"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","018"," 3207","COBB HILL ","LA","OAKTON ","VA","09/19/2004","DOMESTIC ASSAULT "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","019"," 11815","FEDERALIST 2 ","WY","FAIRFAX ","VA","12/30/2004","RECKLESS DRIVING GENERAL "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","020"," 410","MAGNOLIA ","CT","HERNDON ","VA","06/10/2006","FAIL ANSWER SUMMONS "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","020"," 410","MAGNOLIA ","CT","HERNDON ","VA","07/07/2006","PT LARC-OTHER "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","020"," 3207","COBB HILL ","LA","OAKTON ","VA","12/05/2006","DRIVE-OL RVKD/SUSP "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","020"," 3207","COBB HILL ","LA","OAKTON ","VA","12/05/2006","LIC PLATE IMPRO FASTND OR COVERED "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","021"," 3207","COBB HILL ","LA","OAKTON ","VA","12/05/2006","BAD CHECK-NO FORGERY $200+ "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","021"," 3207","COBB HILL ","LA","OAKTON ","VA","12/05/2006","CONTEMPT OF COURT "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","021"," 3207","COBB HILL ","LA","OAKTON ","VA","12/05/2006","DRIVE-OL RVKD/SUSP "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","021"," 3207","COBB HILL ","LA","OAKTON ","VA","12/05/2006","DWI-ALCOHOL "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","022"," 5176","WOODFIELD ","DR","CENTREVILLE ","VA","01/31/2008","DESTRUCTION-PRIV PROP "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","022"," 5176","WOODFIELD ","DR","CENTREVILLE ","VA","01/31/2008","FAIL ANSWER SUMMONS "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","022"," 5176","WOODFIELD ","DR","CENTREVILLE ","VA","01/31/2008","PT LARC-OTHER "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","023"," 5176","WOODFIELD ","DR","CENTREVILLE ","VA","01/21/2009","CREDIT CARD FRAUD "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","023"," 5176","WOODFIELD ","DR","CENTREVILLE ","VA","01/21/2009","IDENTITY FRAUD "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","023"," 5680","CHAPEL RUN ","CT","CENTREVILLE ","VA","05/10/2009","NO LIC OR IMPR LIC HELD "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","023"," 5680","CHAPEL RUN ","CT","CENTREVILLE ","VA","06/14/2009","BAILEE: VIOLATE COND OF RELEASE "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","023"," 5680","CHAPEL RUN ","CT","CENTREVILLE ","VA","06/14/2009","FAIL TO APPEAR ON FELONY CHARGE "
TOOHEY MEGAN ELIZABETH 24 04/06/2011 19.2-306 PROBATION: VIOLATION ON MISDEMEANOR OFFENSE 7520 PURDUE CT, MANASSAS, VA
TOOHEY MEGAN ELIZABETH 25 02/05/2012 5-1-1 DRUNK IN PUBLIC OR PROFANE 7520 PURDUE CT, MANASSAS, VA
TOOHEY MEGAN ELIZABETH 25 07/13/2012 82-1-6[46.2-301] LIC REVOKED: DR W/O LICENSE, 3+ OFF W/IN 10 YRS 7520 PURDUE CT, MANASSAS, VA
TOOHEY MEGAN ELIZABETH 27 10/18/2013 18.2-192(1)(a) CREDIT CARD LARCENY: TAKE/OBTAIN NO. 5176 WOODFIELD DR CENTREVILLE, CENTREVILLE, VA 20120
TOOHEY MEGAN ELIZABETH 27 10/18/2013 18.2-195.2(B) CREDIT CARD APPLICATION: LARCENY, OBTAIN >=$200 5176 WOODFIELD DR CENTREVILLE, CENTREVILLE, VA 20120

Lol I agree, and why are you stealing all my screen names? What a sore loser.

Both these hoes are criminals and deserve consequences.

Lizzie bullying megan negates her pleas for non-judgement in my eyes. If she was sincere, not just mad because she herself is inconvenienced, she would leave Megan's skank ass alone.

Megan + Lizzie = same thing

Bunch of no life losers.

the whole lot of them Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bunch of no life losers.


Thats it. Very simple.

Nostradamus Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Xxh7Y Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ?? Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > who the hell is betterthanyoubitch?
> >
> >
> >
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/88
>
> > 6890.html
>
>
> Another fine example of a female who was asking
> for it, by taking nude photographs and then tried
> to play the victim role when her name and face
> were connected to them.

I don't give a shit. That ass is fucking great. Does she have more pics anywhere?

FFXU look at me I'm a good person! I swear, I helped ducks cross the road!!!


I went to work on a retard farm not because I can't hold a job and had nowhere to go, but just because I'm a good gal.


I didn't assault those officers either, they assaulted me! #handsupdontshoot

eesh clueless Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh is clueless, he thinks these proceedings are
> going to be like ffxu. Where he'll simply troll
> misery and try to undermine and attack his
> character and the jury are going to be like ffxu
> readers. People that dont care and will pile on
> with the same run of the mill type attacks.
>
> He believes hes going to call him a racist and he
> wins lol. This isnt ffxu and you better wise up
> boy. You're in the real world now.


+1

Any lawyer would of told his stupid ass to stop posting until this is all resolved.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He has used racial slurs to describe Asians,
> African-Americans, Jewish people, and Hispanics.
>
>
> I wonder how many minorities will be on the jury?


It's entirely possible that his racial slurs in posts on this site won't be admissible in evidence at trial.

The best thing you could do with your life at this point is to continue working with the mentally challenged and/or the elderly. There is a desperate need for good caretakers and you'll feel good helping others. Who knows - maybe you could find the discipline to get a degree and move up the ladder. You're smart enough to do it.

The worst thing you could do is to continue hanging around people who revel in drama. That will only drag you down and bring out your worst instincts. You could surprise yourself if you put your mind to it.

uCTdN Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > He has used racial slurs to describe Asians,
> > African-Americans, Jewish people, and
> Hispanics.
> >
> >
> > I wonder how many minorities will be on the
> jury?
>
>
> It's entirely possible that his racial slurs in
> posts on this site won't be admissible in evidence
> at trial.

In his fantasy world, eesh thinks that he'll be able to ask Misery any stupid question that pops into his head when Misery's on the stand.

Of course, this is not how a trial actually works. You're limited to asking questions that are directly relevant to the matter at hand, which in this case is the damage done to the Misery family by eesh's tortious conduct.

Phil Leiser will object to eesh's irrelevant questions so many times that he'll sound like a broken Talky Tina doll that can only say "Objection".

The main question is whether eesh will shut up before the judge actually finds him in contempt.

Eesh - but but b-b-b-b-b-utt! no!!!!!!!!!!! (The judge must be a family member of the Morenos or is that Eli!?)

lizzie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > lizzie is a good person. She may have made some
> > mistakes in the past, but I believe that she
> means
> > well and strives for a better world. She has a
> > lot to offer the world; I hope and pray that
> > everything works out well for her.
>
> Thanks eesh..even though it was you who tried to
> make me out to be such a horrible person all these
> years lol. I'm big enough to let that go.
>
> Sure, I've made mistakes and don't some illegal
> things but I'm not ashamed to admit I'm a person
> with issues and living with mental illness. Pretty
> much every time I've been arrested was because I
> wasn't taking care of myself and thinking I had
> overcome my issues. With this most recent thing
> I've learned that I haven't and am seeking help.
>
> Everyone wants to say I'm a criminal, a nigger,
> worthless and useless to society but that shows
> how you people have no idea what I do in this
> community other than what you see me post here. No
> one ever talks about the time I risked my life and
> stopped rush hour traffic on Jermantown Road to
> help a family of geese cross the road. People were
> taking videos, cheering and clapping, it was
> great. You don't know I volunteer to help out
> homeless people and give them hope and actually
> just take the time out to sit and listen to them
> talk, acknowledge their existence, take their
> advice and try to learn from their mistakes.
>
> No one has ever seen a single post of someone I
> know personally come here and say "OMG I KNOW THAT
> GIRL AND SHE DOES THIS THAT AND THAT" why? Because
> I am a totally different person offline than I am
> online, unless I'm suffering through my psychosis
> as I was recently.
>
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?2,file=179334,filename=image.jpg>
>
> They make fun of me for having compassion, a heart
> and the patience to go help as a caregiver for
> adults with developmental disabilities and try to
> better myself and my life and learn some valuable
> skills for a future career.
>
>
>
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?2,file=179335,filename=image.jpg>
>
>
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?2,file=179336,filename=image.jpg>
>
>
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?2,file=179337,filename=image.jpg>
>
> They think all I do is sit here and troll all day
> and have and never will do anything with my life
> but I have and will. Life has ups and downs and I
> have seen my fair share but I ALWAYS get back up
> after being knocked down.
>
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?2,file=179341,filename=image.jpg>
>
> My trolls think they know me based on what I post
> here or some criminal record that I have never let
> stop me from trying in life but those in our
> community who actually know me, know I'm not a bad
> person. I'm troubled but I do still try to keep
> the peace and make people smile.
>
>
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?2,file=179345,filename=image.jpg>
>
> I'm going to continue to grow and learn and reach
> for my goals and live my dream of helping others.
> Make fun of me for living with my parents, so
> what? There are many people older than me living
> with theirs too - at least I'm not struggling to
> make it out there or out there stealing from
> people or robbing and hurting anyone. Make fun of
> me for working in fast food, it's better than
> still selling weed or again - robbing and hurting
> others for money and I am still going to school to
> learn more and I am SO thankful to have a family
> who loves me enough to put up with my shit. I am
> truly blessed and lucky. Where would I be if they
> didn't? Uh, probably out of the street truly being
> a menace to society and robbing people, hurting
> them and actually being a "career criminal" to
> survive.
>
> Troll me all you'd like, it says a lot more about
> you than it does me to make fun of someone with
> obvious mental issues who actually has been trying
> and will continue to try to right my wrongs in
> life!
>
> You say I have no life and stay here all day and
> night well I sure think that's a lot better than
> having me out on the street committing crimes, now
> isn't it?!
>
> > Credibility (as mentioned often in this thread)
> is
> > everything in criminal proceedings, and I
> believe
> > lizzie will get out of her recent troubles
> because
> > her accuser is so discreditable.
>
> Even she knows that I make people happy. You
> rarely ever see me without a smile on my face and
> anyone who's near me without one either.
>
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?2,file=179346,filename=image.jpg>
>
>
> People here have told me that I should "off
> myself" but I can't and won't. Sorry! I have so
> much life left to live and so much to live for.
> Life is precious and it's short enough as it is. I
> always have a smile on my face no matter what's
> going on because I have hope and know that things
> always do get better!
>
> And people always trip out about how I always "get
> away with crimes" I don't get away with shit. I've
> done my time. It's the fact that my crimes don't
> match my character at all and even the police know
> this. The things I've done are usually random and
> out of the ordinary. You may take what I post here
> as who I am but do the things you all post here
> match who you are? I surely hope not lol. This
> website is an outlet for me and I would hope most
> people here are NOT like the persona they portray
> here.
>
>
> Before you troll me again - ask yourself, have
> I ever gone out of my way to save animals, help
> those with special needs or worked with children?
> Have I made someone smile today? What does
> trolling lizzie really do for my self esteem? Am I
> really BETTER than her and if I saw her in person
> would I be as bold in person to say all the things
> I say to her to her face?
>
> I'm no angel and I'm not perfect. I've done and
> said some fucked up shit and have hurt people in
> my life but I am mature enough to accept my karma
> and deal with everything I've been handed in life
> but the universe ALWAYS balances everything out.

Is anyone here supposed to be impressed by this?

> Is anyone here supposed to be impressed by this?


Only a complete mongoloid nog would think someone else would be impressed by any of that.

typical nog mentality Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > Is anyone here supposed to be impressed by
> this?
>
>
> Only a complete mongoloid nog would think someone
> else would be impressed by any of that.

One should note that she fits in rather well with those special-ed tards.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/16/2015 02:47PM by niggar.

uCTdN Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's entirely possible that his racial slurs in
> posts on this site won't be admissible in evidence
> at trial.


This is indeed quite likely, and a number of other issues the defendant and his allies have repeatedly harped on, indeed one might say "crapflooded" the board with (save for the fact that "love is blind," and Our Dear Leader, Cary, is clearly in love with his darling babyboi eesh, who could drench the board in an ocean of tedious, repetitive posts (as he has indeed done these past several months on the subject of "MrMisery's" perceived transgressions, which pale in comparison to "eesh's" various, well-documented campaigns of harassment, threats, and intimidation), and Cary would smile benignly, while two teaspoons from anyone else risks an angry thunderbolt from the FU battlements (in fairness, Cary's ever-varying definitions of "crapflooding," "troll," "garbage," etc, are consistent with the both the spirit and the letter of certain notable 19th-century precedents, q.v.), not to mention the terrifying scrutiny of the dreaded "ban radar" (a sturdy if slightly cumbersome device which Cary purchased from the Stasi after the fall of the Berlin Wall; about which it is reliably reported he once remarked, with a chuckle, "The best investment I ever made," while cheerfully scrubbing away the machine's decades-long accumulation of blood stains and splatters) (rumors that Cary is attempting to reconstruct the "peculiar apparatus" that plays a central role in Kafka's "In the Penal Colony" are unconfirmed at this time; as is the alleged apparatus-construction fund-raising campaign eesh is reportedly conducting (with, it is said, no small enthusiasm) among a "select group" of FU donors) similarly excluded.

^LOLLLL!!! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh - but but b-b-b-b-b-utt! no!!!!!!!!!!! (The
> judge must be a family member of the Morenos or is
> that Eli!?)



Hey, they let the jury hear that Mark Furman was a racist in the OJ trial. Maybe Eesh can tell the judge that when he's responding to the objections.

dkxE9 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ^LOLLLL!!! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Eesh - but but b-b-b-b-b-utt! no!!!!!!!!!!!
> (The
> > judge must be a family member of the Morenos or
> is
> > that Eli!?)
>
>
>
> Hey, they let the jury hear that Mark Furman was a
> racist in the OJ trial. Maybe Eesh can tell the
> judge that when he's responding to the objections.


This isn't a travyon vs zimmerman case, Misery making racist posts has no relevance.

dkxE9 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ^LOLLLL!!! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Eesh - but but b-b-b-b-b-utt! no!!!!!!!!!!!
> (The
> > judge must be a family member of the Morenos or
> is
> > that Eli!?)
>
>
>
> Hey, they let the jury hear that Mark Furman was a
> racist in the OJ trial. Maybe Eesh can tell the
> judge that when he's responding to the objections.


This isn't a travyon vs zimmerman case, Misery making racist posts has no relevance.

different case completely.. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> dkxE9 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ^LOLLLL!!! Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Eesh - but but b-b-b-b-b-utt! no!!!!!!!!!!!
> > (The
> > > judge must be a family member of the Morenos
> or
> > is
> > > that Eli!?)
> >
> >
> >
> > Hey, they let the jury hear that Mark Furman was
> a
> > racist in the OJ trial. Maybe Eesh can tell
> the
> > judge that when he's responding to the
> objections.
>
>
> This isn't a travyon vs zimmerman case, Misery
> making racist posts has no relevance.

Actually, my comment about Mark Furman was supposed to be a joke.

I haven't seen any mentions of Megan in a few days actually, until you brought her up.

Megan Mentions Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I haven't seen any mentions of Megan in a few days
> actually, until you brought her up.


+1

That's just an example of a troll attempting to stir the pot again. Megan has been left alone for the most part, we had some banter the other day but it seems she is finally learning and doing well in not responding to these backhand attacks. Hopefully she keeps it up. The best thing anyone can do is to just forget about her as she wishes.

Edition: I believe lizzie went after Megan after finding out Megan called Papa John's to alert them of the Papa John's thread in the hopes of having lizzie sued for defamation and somehow Cary responsible and sued and the website be shutdown.



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 03/16/2015 04:39PM by Nostradamus.

Nostradamus Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>somehow Cary responsible and sued and the website be shutdown.


this makes no sense how or why would the website be shut down because of that? and why would anyone want it shut down?

I don't know and no one should hurt their brains trying to figure out how Megan thought that would be possible or was even a good idea because it resulted in a boss losing his job. Those are only questions Megan can answer and I advise her not to anymore. It's pointless at this point and what's done is done.

can you ALL please stfu about her? this thread isn't about Megan

please die Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> can you ALL please stfu about her? this thread
> isn't about Megan

Things this thread is not about:
1) lizzie
2) betterthanyoubitch
3) Megan Toohey

Because people on FFXU argue like fucking children and consequently hijack threads to talk about what THEY want to talk about rather than sticking to the topic at hand, all of these non-relevant people have been introduced into this thread.

Lizzy was mentioned in the original post by the OP several times.

Okay so let's discuss the topic at hand then. No more mentioning lizzie, Megan and whoever that smooth ass is:

Discuss!

7dVDW Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
and why would anyone want it shut down?


have you seen the 59 page thread on Megan?

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He has used racial slurs to describe Asians,
> African-Americans, Jewish people, and Hispanics.
>
>
> I wonder how many minorities will be on the jury?


A MALEFACTOR

by Anton Chekhov

AN exceedingly lean little peasant, in a striped hempen shirt and patched drawers, stands facing the investigating magistrate. His face overgrown with hair and pitted with smallpox, and his eyes scarcely visible under thick, overhanging eyebrows have an expression of sullen moroseness. On his head there is a perfect mop of tangled, unkempt hair, which gives him an even more spider-like air of moroseness. He is barefooted.

"Denis Grigoryev!" the magistrate begins. "Come nearer, and answer my questions. On the seventh of this July the railway watchman, Ivan Semyonovitch Akinfov, going along the line in the morning, found you at the hundred-and-forty-first mile engaged in unscrewing a nut by which the rails are made fast to the sleepers. Here it is, the nut! . . . With the aforesaid nut he detained you. Was that so?"

"Wha-at?"

"Was this all as Akinfov states?"

"To be sure, it was."

"Very good; well, what were you unscrewing the nut for?"

"Wha-at?"

"Drop that 'wha-at' and answer the question; what were you unscrewing the nut for?"

"If I hadn't wanted it I shouldn't have unscrewed it," croaks Denis, looking at the ceiling.

"What did you want that nut for?"

"The nut? We make weights out of those nuts for our lines."

"Who is 'we'?"

"We, people. . . . The Klimovo peasants, that is."

"Listen, my man; don't play the idiot to me, but speak sensibly. It's no use telling lies here about weights!"

"I've never been a liar from a child, and now I'm telling lies . . ." mutters Denis, blinking. "But can you do without a weight, your honour? If you put live bait or maggots on a hook, would it go to the bottom without a weight? . . . I am telling lies," grins Denis. . . . "What the devil is the use of the worm if it swims on the surface! The perch and the pike and the eel-pout always go to the bottom, and a bait on the surface is only taken by a shillisper, not very often then, and there are no shillispers in our river. . . . That fish likes plenty of room."

"Why are you telling me about shillispers?"

"Wha-at? Why, you asked me yourself! The gentry catch fish that way too in our parts. The silliest little boy would not try to catch a fish without a weight. Of course anyone who did not understand might go to fish without a weight. There is no rule for a fool."

"So you say you unscrewed this nut to make a weight for your fishing line out of it?"

"What else for? It wasn't to play knuckle-bones with!"

"But you might have taken lead, a bullet . . . a nail of some sort. . . ."

"You don't pick up lead in the road, you have to buy it, and a nail's no good. You can't find anything better than a nut. . . . It's heavy, and there's a hole in it."

"He keeps pretending to be a fool! as though he'd been born yesterday or dropped from heaven! Don't you understand, you blockhead, what unscrewing these nuts leads to? If the watchman had not noticed it the train might have run off the rails, people would have been killed -- you would have killed people."

"God forbid, your honour! What should I kill them for? Are we heathens or wicked people? Thank God, good gentlemen, we have lived all our lives without ever dreaming of such a thing. . . . Save, and have mercy on us, Queen of Heaven! . . . What are you saying?"

"And what do you suppose railway accidents do come from? Unscrew two or three nuts and you have an accident."

Denis grins, and screws up his eye at the magistrate incredulously.

"Why! how many years have we all in the village been unscrewing nuts, and the Lord has been merciful; and you talk of accidents, killing people. If I had carried away a rail or put a log across the line, say, then maybe it might have upset the train, but. . . pouf! a nut!"

"But you must understand that the nut holds the rail fast to the sleepers!"

"We understand that. . . . We don't unscrew them all . . . we leave some. . . . We don't do it thoughtlessly . . . we understand. . . ."

Denis yawns and makes the sign of the cross over his mouth.

"Last year the train went off the rails here," says the magistrate. "Now I see why!"

"What do you say, your honour?"

"I am telling you that now I see why the train went off the rails last year. . . . I understand!"

"That's what you are educated people for, to understand, you kind gentlemen. The Lord knows to whom to give understanding. . . . Here you have reasoned how and what, but the watchman, a peasant like ourselves, with no understanding at all, catches one by the collar and hauls one along. . . . You should reason first and then haul me off. It's a saying that a peasant has a peasant's wit. . . . Write down, too, your honour, that he hit me twice -- in the jaw and in the chest."

"When your hut was searched they found another nut. . . . At what spot did you unscrew that, and when?"

"You mean the nut which lay under the red box?"

"I don't know where it was lying, only it was found. When did you unscrew it?"

"I didn't unscrew it; Ignashka, the son of one-eyed Semyon, gave it me. I mean the one which was under the box, but the one which was in the sledge in the yard Mitrofan and I unscrewed together."

"What Mitrofan?"

"Mitrofan Petrov. . . . Haven't you heard of him? He makes nets in our village and sells them to the gentry. He needs a lot of those nuts. Reckon a matter of ten for each net."

"Listen. Article 1081 of the Penal Code lays down that every wilful damage of the railway line committed when it can expose the traffic on that line to danger, and the guilty party knows that an accident must be caused by it . . . (Do you understand? Knows! And you could not help knowing what this unscrewing would lead to . . .) is liable to penal servitude."

"Of course, you know best. . . . We are ignorant people. . . . What do we understand?"

"You understand all about it! You are lying, shamming!"

"What should I lie for? Ask in the village if you don't believe me. Only a bleak is caught without a weight, and there is no fish worse than a gudgeon, yet even that won't bite without a weight."

"You'd better tell me about the shillisper next," said the magistrate, smiling.

"There are no shillispers in our parts. . . . We cast our line without a weight on the top of the water with a butterfly; a mullet may be caught that way, though that is not often."

"Come, hold your tongue."

A silence follows. Denis shifts from one foot to the other, looks at the table with the green cloth on it, and blinks his eyes violently as though what was before him was not the cloth but the sun. The magistrate writes rapidly.

"Can I go?" asks Denis after a long silence.

"No. I must take you under guard and send you to prison."

Denis leaves off blinking and, raising his thick eyebrows, looks inquiringly at the magistrate.

"How do you mean, to prison? Your honour! I have no time to spare, I must go to the fair; I must get three roubles from Yegor for some tallow! . . ."

"Hold your tongue; don't interrupt."

"To prison. . . . If there was something to go for, I'd go; but just to go for nothing! What for? I haven't stolen anything, I believe, and I've not been fighting. . . . If you are in doubt about the arrears, your honour, don't believe the elder. . . . You ask the agent . . . he's a regular heathen, the elder, you know."

"Hold your tongue."

I am holding my tongue, as it is," mutters Denis; "but that the elder has lied over the account, I'll take my oath for it. . . . There are three of us brothers: Kuzma Grigoryev, then Yegor Grigoryev, and me, Denis Grigoryev."

"You are hindering me. . . . Hey, Semyon," cries the magistrate, "take him away!"

"There are three of us brothers," mutters Denis, as two stalwart soldiers take him and lead him out of the room. "A brother is not responsible for a brother. Kuzma does not pay, so you, Denis, must answer for it. . . . Judges indeed! Our master the general is dead -- the Kingdom of Heaven be his -- or he would have shown you judges. . . . You ought to judge sensibly, not at random. . . . Flog if you like, but flog someone who deserves it, flog with conscience."

WTH?

Ivan_Semyonovitch_Akinfov Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > He has used racial slurs to describe Asians,
> > African-Americans, Jewish people, and
> Hispanics.
> >
> >
> > I wonder how many minorities will be on the
> jury?
>
>
> A MALEFACTOR
>
> by Anton Chekhov
>
> AN exceedingly lean little peasant, in a striped
> hempen shirt and patched drawers, stands facing
> the investigating magistrate. His face overgrown
> with hair and pitted with smallpox, and his eyes
> scarcely visible under thick, overhanging eyebrows
> have an expression of sullen moroseness. On his
> head there is a perfect mop of tangled, unkempt
> hair, which gives him an even more spider-like air
> of moroseness. He is barefooted.
>
> "Denis Grigoryev!" the magistrate begins. "Come
> nearer, and answer my questions. On the seventh of
> this July the railway watchman, Ivan Semyonovitch
> Akinfov, going along the line in the morning,
> found you at the hundred-and-forty-first mile
> engaged in unscrewing a nut by which the rails are
> made fast to the sleepers. Here it is, the nut! .
> . . With the aforesaid nut he detained you. Was
> that so?"
>
> "Wha-at?"
>
> "Was this all as Akinfov states?"
>
> "To be sure, it was."
>
> "Very good; well, what were you unscrewing the nut
> for?"
>
> "Wha-at?"
>
> "Drop that 'wha-at' and answer the question; what
> were you unscrewing the nut for?"
>
> "If I hadn't wanted it I shouldn't have unscrewed
> it," croaks Denis, looking at the ceiling.
>
> "What did you want that nut for?"
>
> "The nut? We make weights out of those nuts for
> our lines."
>
> "Who is 'we'?"
>
> "We, people. . . . The Klimovo peasants, that
> is."
>
> "Listen, my man; don't play the idiot to me, but
> speak sensibly. It's no use telling lies here
> about weights!"
>
> "I've never been a liar from a child, and now I'm
> telling lies . . ." mutters Denis, blinking. "But
> can you do without a weight, your honour? If you
> put live bait or maggots on a hook, would it go to
> the bottom without a weight? . . . I am telling
> lies," grins Denis. . . . "What the devil is the
> use of the worm if it swims on the surface! The
> perch and the pike and the eel-pout always go to
> the bottom, and a bait on the surface is only
> taken by a shillisper, not very often then, and
> there are no shillispers in our river. . . . That
> fish likes plenty of room."
>
> "Why are you telling me about shillispers?"
>
> "Wha-at? Why, you asked me yourself! The gentry
> catch fish that way too in our parts. The silliest
> little boy would not try to catch a fish without a
> weight. Of course anyone who did not understand
> might go to fish without a weight. There is no
> rule for a fool."
>
> "So you say you unscrewed this nut to make a
> weight for your fishing line out of it?"
>
> "What else for? It wasn't to play knuckle-bones
> with!"
>
> "But you might have taken lead, a bullet . . . a
> nail of some sort. . . ."
>
> "You don't pick up lead in the road, you have to
> buy it, and a nail's no good. You can't find
> anything better than a nut. . . . It's heavy, and
> there's a hole in it."
>
> "He keeps pretending to be a fool! as though he'd
> been born yesterday or dropped from heaven! Don't
> you understand, you blockhead, what unscrewing
> these nuts leads to? If the watchman had not
> noticed it the train might have run off the rails,
> people would have been killed -- you would have
> killed people."
>
> "God forbid, your honour! What should I kill them
> for? Are we heathens or wicked people? Thank God,
> good gentlemen, we have lived all our lives
> without ever dreaming of such a thing. . . . Save,
> and have mercy on us, Queen of Heaven! . . . What
> are you saying?"
>
> "And what do you suppose railway accidents do come
> from? Unscrew two or three nuts and you have an
> accident."
>
> Denis grins, and screws up his eye at the
> magistrate incredulously.
>
> "Why! how many years have we all in the village
> been unscrewing nuts, and the Lord has been
> merciful; and you talk of accidents, killing
> people. If I had carried away a rail or put a log
> across the line, say, then maybe it might have
> upset the train, but. . . pouf! a nut!"
>
> "But you must understand that the nut holds the
> rail fast to the sleepers!"
>
> "We understand that. . . . We don't unscrew them
> all . . . we leave some. . . . We don't do it
> thoughtlessly . . . we understand. . . ."
>
> Denis yawns and makes the sign of the cross over
> his mouth.
>
> "Last year the train went off the rails here,"
> says the magistrate. "Now I see why!"
>
> "What do you say, your honour?"
>
> "I am telling you that now I see why the train
> went off the rails last year. . . . I
> understand!"
>
> "That's what you are educated people for, to
> understand, you kind gentlemen. The Lord knows to
> whom to give understanding. . . . Here you have
> reasoned how and what, but the watchman, a peasant
> like ourselves, with no understanding at all,
> catches one by the collar and hauls one along. . .
> . You should reason first and then haul me off.
> It's a saying that a peasant has a peasant's wit.
> . . . Write down, too, your honour, that he hit me
> twice -- in the jaw and in the chest."
>
> "When your hut was searched they found another
> nut. . . . At what spot did you unscrew that, and
> when?"
>
> "You mean the nut which lay under the red box?"
>
> "I don't know where it was lying, only it was
> found. When did you unscrew it?"
>
> "I didn't unscrew it; Ignashka, the son of
> one-eyed Semyon, gave it me. I mean the one which
> was under the box, but the one which was in the
> sledge in the yard Mitrofan and I unscrewed
> together."
>
> "What Mitrofan?"
>
> "Mitrofan Petrov. . . . Haven't you heard of him?
> He makes nets in our village and sells them to the
> gentry. He needs a lot of those nuts. Reckon a
> matter of ten for each net."
>
> "Listen. Article 1081 of the Penal Code lays down
> that every wilful damage of the railway line
> committed when it can expose the traffic on that
> line to danger, and the guilty party knows that an
> accident must be caused by it . . . (Do you
> understand? Knows! And you could not help knowing
> what this unscrewing would lead to . . .) is
> liable to penal servitude."
>
> "Of course, you know best. . . . We are ignorant
> people. . . . What do we understand?"
>
> "You understand all about it! You are lying,
> shamming!"
>
> "What should I lie for? Ask in the village if you
> don't believe me. Only a bleak is caught without a
> weight, and there is no fish worse than a gudgeon,
> yet even that won't bite without a weight."
>
> "You'd better tell me about the shillisper next,"
> said the magistrate, smiling.
>
> "There are no shillispers in our parts. . . . We
> cast our line without a weight on the top of the
> water with a butterfly; a mullet may be caught
> that way, though that is not often."
>
> "Come, hold your tongue."
>
> A silence follows. Denis shifts from one foot to
> the other, looks at the table with the green cloth
> on it, and blinks his eyes violently as though
> what was before him was not the cloth but the sun.
> The magistrate writes rapidly.
>
> "Can I go?" asks Denis after a long silence.
>
> "No. I must take you under guard and send you to
> prison."
>
> Denis leaves off blinking and, raising his thick
> eyebrows, looks inquiringly at the magistrate.
>
> "How do you mean, to prison? Your honour! I have
> no time to spare, I must go to the fair; I must
> get three roubles from Yegor for some tallow! . .
> ."
>
> "Hold your tongue; don't interrupt."
>
> "To prison. . . . If there was something to go
> for, I'd go; but just to go for nothing! What for?
> I haven't stolen anything, I believe, and I've not
> been fighting. . . . If you are in doubt about the
> arrears, your honour, don't believe the elder. . .
> . You ask the agent . . . he's a regular heathen,
> the elder, you know."
>
> "Hold your tongue."
>
> I am holding my tongue, as it is," mutters Denis;
> "but that the elder has lied over the account,
> I'll take my oath for it. . . . There are three of
> us brothers: Kuzma Grigoryev, then Yegor
> Grigoryev, and me, Denis Grigoryev."
>
> "You are hindering me. . . . Hey, Semyon," cries
> the magistrate, "take him away!"
>
> "There are three of us brothers," mutters Denis,
> as two stalwart soldiers take him and lead him out
> of the room. "A brother is not responsible for a
> brother. Kuzma does not pay, so you, Denis, must
> answer for it. . . . Judges indeed! Our master the
> general is dead -- the Kingdom of Heaven be his --
> or he would have shown you judges. . . . You ought
> to judge sensibly, not at random. . . . Flog if
> you like, but flog someone who deserves it, flog
> with conscience."


tl;dr

So you're trying to write some kind of analogy? Nobody can read you mind. Just speak plainly. If not, there are plenty of therapists around.

THE DEATH OF A GOVERNMENT CLERK

by Anton Chekhov

ONE fine evening, a no less fine government clerk called Ivan Dmitritch Tchervyakov was sitting in the second row of the stalls, gazing through an opera glass at the Cloches de Corneville. He gazed and felt at the acme of bliss. But suddenly. . . . In stories one so often meets with this "But suddenly." The authors are right: life is so full of surprises! But suddenly his face puckered up, his eyes disappeared, his breathing was arrested . . . he took the opera glass from his eyes, bent over and . . . "Aptchee!!" he sneezed as you perceive. It is not reprehensible for anyone to sneeze anywhere. Peasants sneeze and so do police superintendents, and sometimes even privy councillors. All men sneeze. Tchervyakov was not in the least confused, he wiped his face with his handkerchief, and like a polite man, looked round to see whether he had disturbed any one by his sneezing. But then he was overcome with confusion. He saw that an old gentleman sitting in front of him in the first row of the stalls was carefully wiping his bald head and his neck with his glove and muttering something to himself. In the old gentleman, Tchervyakov recognised Brizzhalov, a civilian general serving in the Department of Transport.

"I have spattered him," thought Tchervyakov, "he is not the head of my department, but still it is awkward. I must apologise."

Tchervyakov gave a cough, bent his whole person forward, and whispered in the general's ear.

"Pardon, your Excellency, I spattered you accidentally. . . ."

"Never mind, never mind."

"For goodness sake excuse me, I . . . I did not mean to."

"Oh, please, sit down! let me listen!"

Tchervyakov was embarrassed, he smiled stupidly and fell to gazing at the stage. He gazed at it but was no longer feeling bliss. He began to be troubled by uneasiness. In the interval, he went up to Brizzhalov, walked beside him, and overcoming his shyness, muttered:

"I spattered you, your Excellency, forgive me . . . you see . . . I didn't do it to . . . ."

"Oh, that's enough . . . I'd forgotten it, and you keep on about it!" said the general, moving his lower lip impatiently.

"He has forgotten, but there is a fiendish light in his eye," thought Tchervyakov, looking suspiciously at the general. "And he doesn't want to talk. I ought to explain to him . . . that I really didn't intend . . . that it is the law of nature or else he will think I meant to spit on him. He doesn't think so now, but he will think so later!"

On getting home, Tchervyakov told his wife of his breach of good manners. It struck him that his wife took too frivolous a view of the incident; she was a little frightened, but when she learned that Brizzhalov was in a different department, she was reassured.

"Still, you had better go and apologise," she said, "or he will think you don't know how to behave in public."

"That's just it! I did apologise, but he took it somehow queerly . . . he didn't say a word of sense. There wasn't time to talk properly."

Next day Tchervyakov put on a new uniform, had his hair cut and went to Brizzhalov's to explain; going into the general's reception room he saw there a number of petitioners and among them the general himself, who was beginning to interview them. After questioning several petitioners the general raised his eyes and looked at Tchervyakov.

"Yesterday at the Arcadia, if you recollect, your Excellency," the latter began, "I sneezed and . . . accidentally spattered . . . Exc. . . ."

"What nonsense. . . . It's beyond anything! What can I do for you," said the general addressing the next petitioner.

"He won't speak," thought Tchervyakov, turning pale; "that means that he is angry. . . . No, it can't be left like this. . . . I will explain to him."

When the general had finished his conversation with the last of the petitioners and was turning towards his inner apartments, Tchervyakov took a step towards him and muttered:

"Your Excellency! If I venture to trouble your Excellency, it is simply from a feeling I may say of regret! . . . It was not intentional if you will graciously believe me."

The general made a lachrymose face, and waved his hand.

"Why, you are simply making fun of me, sir," he said as he closed the door behind him.

"Where's the making fun in it?" thought Tchervyakov, "there is nothing of the sort! He is a general, but he can't understand. If that is how it is I am not going to apologise to that fanfaron any more! The devil take him. I'll write a letter to him, but I won't go. By Jove, I won't."

So thought Tchervyakov as he walked home; he did not write a letter to the general, he pondered and pondered and could not make up that letter. He had to go next day to explain in person.

"I ventured to disturb your Excellency yesterday," he muttered, when the general lifted enquiring eyes upon him, "not to make fun as you were pleased to say. I was apologising for having spattered you in sneezing. . . . And I did not dream of making fun of you. Should I dare to make fun of you, if we should take to making fun, then there would be no respect for persons, there would be. . . ."

"Be off!" yelled the general, turning suddenly purple, and shaking all over.

"What?" asked Tchervyakov, in a whisper turning numb with horror.

"Be off!" repeated the general, stamping.

Something seemed to give way in Tchervyakov's stomach. Seeing nothing and hearing nothing he reeled to the door, went out into the street, and went staggering along. . . . Reaching home mechanically, without taking off his uniform, he lay down on the sofa and died.
/
Attachments:

It appears the Cray Cray thread has died and the slack is being picked up here.

I predict it wont be long before Megan makes an appearence. She's probably following the Cray Cray thread and wondering to herself...."Why is nobody talking about me?"

A SLANDER

by Anton Chekhov

SERGE KAPITONICH AHINEEV, the writing master, was marrying his daughter to the teacher of history and geography. The wedding festivities were going off most successfully. In the drawing room there was singing, playing, and dancing. Waiters hired from the club were flitting distractedly about the rooms, dressed in black swallow-tails and dirty white ties. There was a continual hubbub and din of conversation. Sitting side by side on the sofa, the teacher of mathematics, Tarantulov, the French teacher, Pasdequoi, and the junior assessor of taxes, Mzda, were talking hurriedly and interrupting one another as they described to the guests cases of persons being buried alive, and gave their opinions on spiritualism. None of them believed in spiritualism, but all admitted that there were many things in this world which would always be beyond the mind of man. In the next room the literature master, Dodonsky, was explaining to the visitors the cases in which a sentry has the right to fire on passers-by. The subjects, as you perceive, were alarming, but very agreeable. Persons whose social position precluded them from entering were looking in at the windows from the yard.

Just at midnight the master of the house went into the kitchen to see whether everything was ready for supper. The kitchen from floor to ceiling was filled with fumes composed of goose, duck, and many other odours. On two tables the accessories, the drinks and light refreshments, were set out in artistic disorder. The cook, Marfa, a red-faced woman whose figure was like a barrel with a belt around it, was bustling about the tables.

"Show me the sturgeon, Marfa," said Ahineev, rubbing his hands and licking his lips. "What a perfume! I could eat up the whole kitchen. Come, show me the sturgeon."

Marfa went up to one of the benches and cautiously lifted a piece of greasy newspaper. Under the paper on an immense dish there reposed a huge sturgeon, masked in jelly and decorated with capers, olives, and carrots. Ahineev gazed at the sturgeon and gasped. His face beamed, he turned his eyes up. He bent down and with his lips emitted the sound of an ungreased wheel. After standing a moment he snapped his fingers with delight and once more smacked his lips.

"Ah-ah! the sound of a passionate kiss. . . . Who is it you're kissing out there, little Marfa?" came a voice from the next room, and in the doorway there appeared the cropped head of the assistant usher, Vankin. "Who is it? A-a-h! . . . Delighted to meet you! Sergei Kapitonich! You're a fine grandfather, I must say! Tête-à-tête with the fair sex--tette!"

"I'm not kissing," said Ahineev in confusion. "Who told you so, you fool? I was only . . . I smacked my lips . . . in reference to . . . as an indication of. . . pleasure . . . at the sight of the fish."

"Tell that to the marines!" The intrusive face vanished, wearing a broad grin.

Ahineev flushed.

"Hang it!" he thought, "the beast will go now and talk scandal. He'll disgrace me to all the town, the brute."

Ahineev went timidly into the drawing-room and looked stealthily round for Vankin. Vankin was standing by the piano, and, bending down with a jaunty air, was whispering something to the inspector's sister-in-law, who was laughing.

"Talking about me!" thought Ahineev. "About me, blast him! And she believes it . . . believes it! She laughs! Mercy on us! No, I can't let it pass . . . I can't. I must do something to prevent his being believed. . . . I'll speak to them all, and he'll be shown up for a fool and a gossip."

Ahineev scratched his head, and still overcome with embarrassment, went up to Pasdequoi.

"I've just been in the kitchen to see after the supper," he said to the Frenchman. "I know you are fond of fish, and I've a sturgeon, my dear fellow, beyond everything! A yard and a half long! Ha, ha, ha! And, by the way . . . I was just forgetting. . . . In the kitchen just now, with that sturgeon . . . quite a little story! I went into the kitchen just now and wanted to look at the supper dishes. I looked at the sturgeon and I smacked my lips with relish . . . at the piquancy of it. And at the very moment that fool Vankin came in and said: . . . 'Ha, ha, ha! . . . So you're kissing here!' Kissing Marfa, the cook! What a thing to imagine, silly fool! The woman is a perfect fright, like all the beasts put together, and he talks about kissing! Queer fish!"

"Who's a queer fish?" asked Tarantulov, coming up.

"Why he, over there -- Vankin! I went into the kitchen . . ."

And he told the story of Vankin. ". . . He amused me, queer fish! I'd rather kiss a dog than Marfa, if you ask me," added Ahineev. He looked round and saw behind him Mzda.

"We were talking of Vankin," he said. "Queer fish, he is! He went into the kitchen, saw me beside Marfa, and began inventing all sorts of silly stories. 'Why are you kissing?' he says. He must have had a drop too much. 'And I'd rather kiss a turkeycock than Marfa,' I said, 'And I've a wife of my own, you fool,' said I. He did amuse me!"

"Who amused you?" asked the priest who taught Scripture in the school, going up to Ahineev.

"Vankin. I was standing in the kitchen, you know, looking at the sturgeon. . . ."

And so on. Within half an hour or so all the guests knew the incident of the sturgeon and Vankin.

"Let him tell away now!" thought Ahineev, rubbing his hands. "Let him! He'll begin telling his story and they'll say to him at once, 'Enough of your improbable nonsense, you fool, we know all about it!' "

And Ahineev was so relieved that in his joy he drank four glasses too many. After escorting the young people to their room, he went to bed and slept like an innocent babe, and next day he thought no more of the incident with the sturgeon. But, alas! man proposes, but God disposes. An evil tongue did its evil work, and Ahineev's strategy was of no avail. Just a week later -- to be precise, on Wednesday after the third lesson -- when Ahineev was standing in the middle of the teacher's room, holding forth on the vicious propensities of a boy called Visekin, the head master went up to him and drew him aside:

"Look here, Sergei Kapitonich," said the head master, "you must excuse me. . . . It's not my business; but all the same I must make you realize. . . . It's my duty. You see, there are rumors that you are romancing with that . . . cook. . . . It's nothing to do with me, but . . . flirt with her, kiss her . . . as you please, but don't let it be so public, please. I entreat you! Don't forget that you're a schoolmaster."

Ahineev turned cold and faint. He went home like a man stung by a whole swarm of bees, like a man scalded with boiling water. As he walked home, it seemed to him that the whole town was looking at him as though he were smeared with pitch. At home fresh trouble awaited him.

"Why aren't you gobbling up your food as usual?" his wife asked him at dinner. "What are you so pensive about? Brooding over your amours? Pining for your Marfa? I know all about it, Mohammedan! Kind friends have opened my eyes! O-o-o! . . . you savage!"

And she slapped him in the face. He got up from the table, not feeling the earth under his feet, and without his hat or coat, made his way to Vankin. He found him at home.

"You scoundrel!" he addressed him. "Why have you covered me with mud before all the town? Why did you set this slander going about me?"

"What slander? What are you talking about?"

"Who was it gossiped of my kissing Marfa? Wasn't it you? Tell me that. Wasn't it you, you brigand?"

Vankin blinked and twitched in every fibre of his battered countenance, raised his eyes to the icon and articulated, "God blast me! Strike me blind and lay me out, if I said a single word about you! May I be left without house and home, may I be stricken with worse than cholera!"

Vankin's sincerity did not admit of doubt. It was evidently not he who was the author of the slander.

"But who, then, who?" Ahineev wondered, going over all his acquaintances in his mind and beating himself on the breast. "Who, then?"

Who, then? We, too, ask the reader.
Attachments:

Well done Chekhov. " Trantulov" ...Indeed. Well done. Brava.

Thanks lit fag.

DanoWells Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Both Misery and Lizzie strike me

she has balls on the end of her tits

This thread is evidence that adult ADHD isn't a myth

"Of public interest.Therefore.." Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A SLANDER
>
> by Anton Chekhov
>
> SERGE KAPITONICH AHINEEV, the writing master, was
> marrying his daughter to the teacher of history
> and geography. The wedding festivities were going
> off most successfully. In the drawing room there
> was singing, playing, and dancing. Waiters hired
> from the club were flitting distractedly about the
> rooms, dressed in black swallow-tails and dirty
> white ties. There was a continual hubbub and din
> of conversation. Sitting side by side on the sofa,
> the teacher of mathematics, Tarantulov, the French
> teacher, Pasdequoi, and the junior assessor of
> taxes, Mzda, were talking hurriedly and
> interrupting one another as they described to the
> guests cases of persons being buried alive, and
> gave their opinions on spiritualism. None of them
> believed in spiritualism, but all admitted that
> there were many things in this world which would
> always be beyond the mind of man. In the next room
> the literature master, Dodonsky, was explaining to
> the visitors the cases in which a sentry has the
> right to fire on passers-by. The subjects, as you
> perceive, were alarming, but very agreeable.
> Persons whose social position precluded them from
> entering were looking in at the windows from the
> yard.
>
> Just at midnight the master of the house went into
> the kitchen to see whether everything was ready
> for supper. The kitchen from floor to ceiling was
> filled with fumes composed of goose, duck, and
> many other odours. On two tables the accessories,
> the drinks and light refreshments, were set out in
> artistic disorder. The cook, Marfa, a red-faced
> woman whose figure was like a barrel with a belt
> around it, was bustling about the tables.
>
> "Show me the sturgeon, Marfa," said Ahineev,
> rubbing his hands and licking his lips. "What a
> perfume! I could eat up the whole kitchen. Come,
> show me the sturgeon."
>
> Marfa went up to one of the benches and cautiously
> lifted a piece of greasy newspaper. Under the
> paper on an immense dish there reposed a huge
> sturgeon, masked in jelly and decorated with
> capers, olives, and carrots. Ahineev gazed at the
> sturgeon and gasped. His face beamed, he turned
> his eyes up. He bent down and with his lips
> emitted the sound of an ungreased wheel. After
> standing a moment he snapped his fingers with
> delight and once more smacked his lips.
>
> "Ah-ah! the sound of a passionate kiss. . . . Who
> is it you're kissing out there, little Marfa?"
> came a voice from the next room, and in the
> doorway there appeared the cropped head of the
> assistant usher, Vankin. "Who is it? A-a-h! . . .
> Delighted to meet you! Sergei Kapitonich! You're a
> fine grandfather, I must say! Tête-à-tête with
> the fair sex--tette!"
>
> "I'm not kissing," said Ahineev in confusion. "Who
> told you so, you fool? I was only . . . I smacked
> my lips . . . in reference to . . . as an
> indication of. . . pleasure . . . at the sight of
> the fish."
>
> "Tell that to the marines!" The intrusive face
> vanished, wearing a broad grin.
>
> Ahineev flushed.
>
> "Hang it!" he thought, "the beast will go now and
> talk scandal. He'll disgrace me to all the town,
> the brute."
>
> Ahineev went timidly into the drawing-room and
> looked stealthily round for Vankin. Vankin was
> standing by the piano, and, bending down with a
> jaunty air, was whispering something to the
> inspector's sister-in-law, who was laughing.
>
> "Talking about me!" thought Ahineev. "About me,
> blast him! And she believes it . . . believes it!
> She laughs! Mercy on us! No, I can't let it pass .
> . . I can't. I must do something to prevent his
> being believed. . . . I'll speak to them all, and
> he'll be shown up for a fool and a gossip."
>
> Ahineev scratched his head, and still overcome
> with embarrassment, went up to Pasdequoi.
>
> "I've just been in the kitchen to see after the
> supper," he said to the Frenchman. "I know you are
> fond of fish, and I've a sturgeon, my dear fellow,
> beyond everything! A yard and a half long! Ha, ha,
> ha! And, by the way . . . I was just forgetting. .
> . . In the kitchen just now, with that sturgeon .
> . . quite a little story! I went into the kitchen
> just now and wanted to look at the supper dishes.
> I looked at the sturgeon and I smacked my lips
> with relish . . . at the piquancy of it. And at
> the very moment that fool Vankin came in and said:
> . . . 'Ha, ha, ha! . . . So you're kissing here!'
> Kissing Marfa, the cook! What a thing to imagine,
> silly fool! The woman is a perfect fright, like
> all the beasts put together, and he talks about
> kissing! Queer fish!"
>
> "Who's a queer fish?" asked Tarantulov, coming
> up.
>
> "Why he, over there -- Vankin! I went into the
> kitchen . . ."
>
> And he told the story of Vankin. ". . . He amused
> me, queer fish! I'd rather kiss a dog than Marfa,
> if you ask me," added Ahineev. He looked round and
> saw behind him Mzda.
>
> "We were talking of Vankin," he said. "Queer fish,
> he is! He went into the kitchen, saw me beside
> Marfa, and began inventing all sorts of silly
> stories. 'Why are you kissing?' he says. He must
> have had a drop too much. 'And I'd rather kiss a
> turkeycock than Marfa,' I said, 'And I've a wife
> of my own, you fool,' said I. He did amuse me!"
>
> "Who amused you?" asked the priest who taught
> Scripture in the school, going up to Ahineev.
>
> "Vankin. I was standing in the kitchen, you know,
> looking at the sturgeon. . . ."
>
> And so on. Within half an hour or so all the
> guests knew the incident of the sturgeon and
> Vankin.
>
> "Let him tell away now!" thought Ahineev, rubbing
> his hands. "Let him! He'll begin telling his story
> and they'll say to him at once, 'Enough of your
> improbable nonsense, you fool, we know all about
> it!' "
>
> And Ahineev was so relieved that in his joy he
> drank four glasses too many. After escorting the
> young people to their room, he went to bed and
> slept like an innocent babe, and next day he
> thought no more of the incident with the sturgeon.
> But, alas! man proposes, but God disposes. An evil
> tongue did its evil work, and Ahineev's strategy
> was of no avail. Just a week later -- to be
> precise, on Wednesday after the third lesson --
> when Ahineev was standing in the middle of the
> teacher's room, holding forth on the vicious
> propensities of a boy called Visekin, the head
> master went up to him and drew him aside:
>
> "Look here, Sergei Kapitonich," said the head
> master, "you must excuse me. . . . It's not my
> business; but all the same I must make you
> realize. . . . It's my duty. You see, there are
> rumors that you are romancing with that . . .
> cook. . . . It's nothing to do with me, but . . .
> flirt with her, kiss her . . . as you please, but
> don't let it be so public, please. I entreat you!
> Don't forget that you're a schoolmaster."
>
> Ahineev turned cold and faint. He went home like a
> man stung by a whole swarm of bees, like a man
> scalded with boiling water. As he walked home, it
> seemed to him that the whole town was looking at
> him as though he were smeared with pitch. At home
> fresh trouble awaited him.
>
> "Why aren't you gobbling up your food as usual?"
> his wife asked him at dinner. "What are you so
> pensive about? Brooding over your amours? Pining
> for your Marfa? I know all about it, Mohammedan!
> Kind friends have opened my eyes! O-o-o! . . . you
> savage!"
>
> And she slapped him in the face. He got up from
> the table, not feeling the earth under his feet,
> and without his hat or coat, made his way to
> Vankin. He found him at home.
>
> "You scoundrel!" he addressed him. "Why have you
> covered me with mud before all the town? Why did
> you set this slander going about me?"
>
> "What slander? What are you talking about?"
>
> "Who was it gossiped of my kissing Marfa? Wasn't
> it you? Tell me that. Wasn't it you, you
> brigand?"
>
> Vankin blinked and twitched in every fibre of his
> battered countenance, raised his eyes to the icon
> and articulated, "God blast me! Strike me blind
> and lay me out, if I said a single word about you!
> May I be left without house and home, may I be
> stricken with worse than cholera!"
>
> Vankin's sincerity did not admit of doubt. It was
> evidently not he who was the author of the
> slander.
>
> "But who, then, who?" Ahineev wondered, going over
> all his acquaintances in his mind and beating
> himself on the breast. "Who, then?"
>
> Who, then? We, too, ask the reader.


tl;dr

   





INT. HENRICO COUNTY MAGISTRATE'S OFFICE
The office is a small room in the back of a grocery store, heated by a potbelly stove.

                                     

                                    HENRICO'S FINEST MAGISTRATE
              Hmmmm...  Let's see here.

              On the one hand, we've got some 1,300 posts by "eesh" harassing
              Meade Skelton, and on 'tother, we've got 22 posts that criticize "eesh"
              for stalking, threats, blah blah blah, etc.

              Hey! That a picture of your gun, Mike? It's a beaut.

                                                           "EESH"
              Thanks, your Honor!

                                    HENRICO'S FINEST MAGISTRATE
              And what's this you wrote next to it? "Hi Chuck." Haw haw.
              I suppose this pansy "Chuck" felt threatened by that?

                                                           "EESH"
                                                       (rolls eyes)
              Oh yeah. He made quite a fuss. Quite the little bitch, if you'll pardon
              my fran-sezz. Acted like he'd never seen a gun before. And it's not
              like I actually threatened him. Well, maybe just a little. But this guy...
              Your Honor, you've never met such a jerk.

                                    HENRICO'S FINEST MAGISTRATE
              Sounds like he deserved it. Anyway, this Meade character, so he's
              been threatening you?

                                                           "EESH"
              Your Honor, he actually had the nerve to post a video on Youtube in
              which he called me a "troll" ! And he's crazy, your Honor. He --

                                    HENRICO'S FINEST MAGISTRATE
              Don't waste your breath son. The evidence of probable cause is
              overwhelming. Now, where's that durn warrant?

He locates and signs it, hands it to "eesh".

                                                           "EESH"
              Oh, thank you, your Honor! Um, I don't want to take up a lot of your
              time, but if you don't mind, there are these two other guys who have
              been threatening me. Chuckhoffman, you know, that jerk I was telling
              you about. And this other character, MrMisery, who's just plain nuts.

                                    HENRICO'S FINEST MAGISTRATE
              Happy to oblige, Mike. Anything else?

The magistrate begins to prepare the two additional warrants.

                                                           "EESH"
              Nope. I'm all set..................

"Eesh" rubs his hands together, smiling gleefully.





INT. FAIRFAX COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

                                     
                                           A *REAL* JUDGE
              Are you kidding me?

                                                  "EESH"
              Bu- bu- bu- your Honor! The evidence...!

                                           A *REAL* JUDGE
                                                   (sighs)
              What evidence? This?
                                        (holds up several pages)
              This is not evidence. This is... This is garbage.

                                                  "EESH
              But your Honor! I'm in fear for my life from this man!!

                                           A *REAL* JUDGE
              Then why did you repeatedly, over a period of months,
              mock the very idea that you had anything to fear from
              MrMisery? Indeed, you stated that he was too afraid to
              get in his car and drive out of his own neighborhood.

                                                  "EESH"
              Well, things have changed! You saw that post --

                                           A *REAL* JUDGE
              The one by "FagCity99"?

                                                  "EESH
              Yes!

                                           A *REAL* JUDGE
              And you know exactly how that that was posted by
              "MrMisery"?

                                                  "EESH
              Well, I just do!  I am expert in detecting the "voice"
              of "MrMisery." I could spot it anywhere.

                                           A *REAL* JUDGE
              Well, that's just not good enough, Mr. Eesh. It's not
              nearly good enough.

                                                  "EESH
              But I'm the VICTIM here. Just look at these pamphlets.

He holds out his VINE pamphlets beseeshingly.

                                                  "EESH
              Right there in black and white, it says I'm the victim.
              It SAYS so! And it's signed by the District Attorney!

                                           A *REAL* JUDGE
                                        (bangs gavel)
              The case is dismissed. Defendant is ordered to pay costs.

                                                  "EESH
              What?! Pay costs?!

                                           A *REAL* JUDGE
              Another word and I'll hold you in contempt.

                                                  "EESH
              How 'bout two words. FUCK YOU. You fucking asshole.
              I'll KILL you, bitch!!

                                           A *REAL* JUDGE
              Bailiff, remove the defendant from the courtroom.

Eesh is dragged struggling and kicking from the room.

                                                  "EESH
              You haven't seen the last of me, you fucking bitch!
              I know where you live!

The judge watches calmly for a few moments, until eesh is gone. Then he turns to Miz.

                                           A *REAL* JUDGE
              Now, tell me, MrMisery. Who is this individual "Cary"
              you mentioned? Who, as you put it --

He puts on his reading glasses, looks through his papers. Finds a page, holds it up, and begins to read.

                                           A *REAL* JUDGE
              You write, "Acting with a reckless and callous disregard
              for the rights and safety of others, Cary permitted and
              empowered 'eesh' to use Fairfax Underground as an instrument
              for 'eesh's' sociopathic aggression."

He pauses, and removes his glass. Looks at Miz.


End of Part 1.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> CourthouseObserver Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I had a couple of hour-long break in my
> schedule
> > this morning, and so I decided to drop into
> > Fairfax County Circuit Courtroom 4F to observe
> as
> > much as I could of today's proceedings in the
> case
> > of Misery v. Eesh.
>
>
> No, the judge didn't enter the courtroom until
> 10:20, and it was well past 12:00 when I got
> finished. You weren't there because you "had a
> break."
>
>
> > My Bottom-Line take on the situation is that
> Eesh
> > is in a lot of trouble here.
>
>
> No, not actually, but keep wishing that if it
> makes you feel better.
>
>
> > First, the atmospherics...
> >
> > The court was entertaining pretrial and
> > interlocutory motions, rather than conducting
> > trials and so, for the most part, those present
> in
> > and addressing the court were attorneys for
> > plaintiffs and defendants who were arguing
> their
> > motions before the court.
>
>
> It was just a motions day. Very mundane and mostly
> continuances before we got to be heard. If your
> idea of entertainment is listening to attorneys
> asking for continuances, more power to you.
>
>
> > Eesh was there, accompanied by Lizzy, and
> they sat
> > together in the back row until their case was
> > called.
>
> > Eesh was smartly dressed, with well-pressed
> Khaki
> > pants, a blue blazer, a dress shirt and tie.
> Lizzy
> > was conservatively dressed in black in what
> > appeared to be business attire and running
> shoes.
> > While Lizzy sat beside him for much of the time
> > that the court was in session, she left the
> > courtroom occasionally (to make phone calls, I
> > believe) and returned each time. Indeed, she
> > actually was out of the courtroom when the
> Misery
> > v. Eesh case was called before the judge and
> > missed most of the proceedings.
>
>
> I get it, you were there and you really want us to
> know you saw us.
>
>
> > Someone who I assumed was Misery was there,
> as
> > well, sitting by himself dressed much more
> > casually.
>
>
> No, the plaintiffs weren't there, just the
> attorney. It was just a motions day.
>
> > Misery's attorney was unconventional in his
> > appearance, in that he had long, flowing hair
> and
> > a good amount of facial hair. But he was
> > professionally dressed in a dark suit, dress
> > shirt, tie, and pocket square, and he comported
> > himself well professionally during and after
> the
> > proceedings.
>
> Again, you proved your point. You were there,
> congratulations.
>
>
> > The biggest surprise for me, though, was that
> Eesh
> > was appearing pro Se, which (for the few FFX
> > Underground users who are not attorneys) means
> he
> > was without counsel.
>
>
> This was already known on the site.
>
> > The purpose of today's proceedings was for
> the
> > court to hear arguments and rule on a motion by
> > Eesh's attorney for summary judgement in the
> case.
>
>
> No, it was a motion for default judgement. Summary
> judgement is entirely different.
>
>
> > As best as I can understand it (I did not
> speak
> > to any of the parties after the proceedings to
> > confirm this), the motion was predicated on the
> > fact that Eesh did not file a response to the
> suit
> > within the time period required by law and
> still
> > had not filed a response.
>
>
> You should have listened more instead of noting
> how I was dressed.
>
>
> As a general matter,
> > when this occurs, a plantiff (the charging
> party)
> > will ask the court to enter a summary judgement
> > against the defendant (the person who is being
> > sued) and in favor of the plaintiff.
>
>
> Charging party? LOL You mean moving party. Again,
> default judgement, not summary judgement.
>
>
>
> > Eesh's "defense" to the motion for summary
> > judgement was to file a motion of his own,
> asking
> > the judge to quash service (ask the judge to
> rule
> > that he, the defendant, had not been properly
> > served or given notice of the suit and/or not
> > given proper notice of the motions filed by the
> > plaintiff).
>
>
> It wasn't a defense. It's called a motion to quash
> process pursuant to § 8.01-277. You should have
> listened more.
>
>
> > Misery's attorney presented a compelling case
> in
> > favor of his motion for summary judgement,
> > asserting that the suit and notice had been
> > properly served by the Sheriff, offering the
> court
> > proof of the same, and asserting that Eesh had
> not
> > responded to the suit in the proper timeframe.
>
>
>
>
> No, I responded in a timely manner, noting the
> incomplete service. § 8.01-296(2)(b) lays out
> what is needed when the service is posted to a
> door of an abode.
>
> Again, you should have been listening.
>
>
> He
> > asked that, in the alternative, if the judge
> > declined to make a summary judgement in favor
> of
> > Misery, that she award Misery $1,900 in
> attorneys
> > fees and costs that had been incurred so far to
> > research, prepared, file, and argue the motions
> > and that said fees and costs be paid as a
> > precondition to allowing Eesh to continue in
> the
> > case without summary judgement.
>
>
> That's not what he said. LOL at "precondition". At
> this point you are making things up.
>
>
> > Appearing on his own behalf, Eesh offered no
> > defense to not having responded to the suit.
> > Instead, contended that he had not been
> properly
> > served and asked the judge to quash
> service.
>
>
> You don't defend yourself on motions day, you
> explain what happened. It's not a defense, and the
> judge accepted my explanation.
>
>
> > The judge agreed with Misery's attorney that
> > service had been properly made; that Eesh had
> not
> > responded at all, let alone within the
> timeframes
> > required by law; and that grounds were there
> for
> > summary judgement.
>
>
> No, this is more bullshit from you. The judge
> noted the service was incomplete, as the steps
> laid out in § 8.01-296(2)(b) had not been
> followed. She also noted that I did respond, and
> she even said that default judgement cannot occur
> when service is posted to a door of an abode.
>
> She indicated however, that
> > she was reluctant to do so in this instance at
> > this time, in part because Eesh was appearing
> Pro
> > Se.
>
>
> More bullshit from you. The fact I was there Pro
> Se had no impact on her ruling against the motion
> for default judgement, or summary judgement as you
> are determined to call it.
>
>
> She castigated Eesh for not responding to the
> > suit, as well as for his motion to quash
> service
> > -- both on the merits of the motion and for his
> > failure to properly file it.
>
>
> Castigated? Not at all. The motion to quash
> process had merits, which why she didn't deny it.
>
>
> > Eesh appeared confused about the legalities
> of the
> > situation he is in and of what he needs to do
> in
> > order to defend himself, saying several times
> that
> > he has no legal training; that he is attending
> > school on the GI Bill and has no money for
> > attorneys; and that he had consulted an
> attorney
> > who wanted $10,000 from him to take the case,
> > which he did not have.
>
>
> Seriously LOL Where are you getting this from?
>
>
> > The judge was having none of it.
>
>
> Actually, she was very laid back and friendly, but
> we'll go along with your melodramatic story.
>
>
> > She told him that he was gambling by not
> having
> > counsel and that, at the very least, he needs
> to
> > talk with one. She quizzed him on several
> aspects
> > of court procedure. He was unable to
> > satisfactorily answer her.
>
>
> Again, listen more, dramatize less. The lawyer
> called me a gambler for acting pro se.
>
>
> > In the end, she cut him a MAJOR break.
>
>
> ...but you just said "she was having none of
> that."
>
>
>
> > She denied both the motion for summary
> judgement
> > and the motion to quash service.
>
>
> She denied the motion for default judgement, the
> motion to quash service will be heard again.
>
>
>
> However, she
> > gave Eesh ten days to either respond to the
> suit
> > or properly file a motion to quash service,
> > whichever he chose to do. On the request by
> > Misery's attorney for attorneys fees, she
> denied
> > that request without prejudice, saying that the
> > attorney could bring that up again at the
> > appropriate time.
>
>
> Again, your story doesn't add up. You say she
> denied the motion to quash process, now you say
> she is allowing 10 days to refile. You can't have
> both.
>
>
> > Eesh is in trouble.
> >
> > My free legal advice to him is ...
>
>
>
> Free legal advice from an e-lawyer. This is going
> to be good.
>
> > First, get an attorney. If you cannot afford
> one,
> > SURELY you can find a First Amendment attorney
> > (ACLU, perhaps?) who would do it for free.
>
>
>
> Sounds like you have experience with crying to the
> ACLU for help. Let me guess, your civil rights
> were trampled upon at one point.
>
>
> This
> > is a significant case that could have
> implications
> > far beyond FFX Underground
>
> Don't kid yourself. This is a vexatious lawsuit,
> pure and simple.
>
>
> > Misery's attorney is good. You
> > have little hope of prevailing if you are not
> > represented, as well.
>
>
> Fortunately, you don't know what I've been told by
> the attorneys that I have consulted.
>
>
> > Second, stop posting on Fairfax Underground
> until
> > this suit is over. Nothing you could possibly
> > post can help you. But you have no idea how
> > things you might post might hurt you.
>
>
> I know you want me off the site, and I know that
> it pains you that I have never been banned, but
> try harder with the pseudo-advice.
>
>
> > Third, as wonderful a person as Lizzy might
> be (I
> > offer neither an endorsement nor a commendation
> of
> > her), you might not want to show up with her in
> > court.
>
>
> She has no part in this suit, she was there to
> take care of something.
>
>
> If you want her to be a witness for you,
> > she might not be permitted to testify on your
> > behalf if she has been prejudiced by viewing
> prior
> > proceedings.
>
>
> You mean......she could be impeached as a witness?
> Is that what you are attempting to say?
>
>
> And she DOES have pending felony
> > charges against her (although, from what I can
> > tell, those charges might well be bogus).
> >
> > More later...
>
>
> ...and that has no relation to this suit. Somehow
> that escapes you.
>
>
>
>
> So, the gist from this is, you wrote a lot of
> bullshit, you clearly weren't listening. You were
> more interested in taking note of what I was
> wearing than actually listening to the motion.
> You also want me off the site and want me to stop
> associating with lizzie. Basically, you are
> threatened by our presence on the site, but not
> threatened enough to sit by us in person.





interior/final scene:


Ransom Stoddard: "You're not going to use the story, Mr. Scott?"

(Ransom Stoddard, standing by the printing press, having just finished explaining the truth--that the late, good-hearted rancher Tom Donophin actually shot outlaw Liberty Valance, not him; a draft of newsman Maxwell Scott's story sits on the bureau, just out of Ransome's view)

Maxwell Scott: "This is Fairfax Underground, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend."

(Maxwell Scott picks up the draft lying on the bureau, then pauses a moment, grunts and stops in his tracks, brow furrowed suddenly and inexplicably; slowly, turns back around to face Ransom, incredulity written in his face)

Maxwell Scott: "Shit, Ranse....I don't reckon we got enough ink in all of Fairfax to print even this here legend, though....you sure this is how it happened? Let me look at my notes....something mighty off about this here draft...wait just a second..."

(eyes scanning over the draft, a look of horror replaces the incredulity)

Maxwell Scott: "Ransome....this ain't my draft at all, it's--it's--"

(Liberty Valance suddenly rises from his grave, bursts through the doors and whips out his mossberg; shoots Stoddard and Scott dead; begins printing the story anyway)

Liberty Valance (in Sergio Leone-style close-up): "Well, 'pilgrim'...ya' wanna say that yella' bellied lilly livered egg-suckin' dog Tom Donophin actually shot the great Liberty Valance? Heh...'that'll be the day'..."

(close-up of blood-soaked Liberty Valance-drafted story, swapped out with Scott's original draft...printing press in motion)


end(?)

/
Attachments:

Okay, that's pretty cool.

Triumph of Liberty Valance = Rise of Obama's lawless thug political regime.

Still, if Tom D's hand shot up through that coffin lid, grabbed Vera Miles and dragged her down to hell, that might be pretty cool, too.

And maybe Pompey does a voodoo ceremony on the side that brings Liberty Valance back to life.


Pompey: It begun with the words, uh… “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that, uh, that…”
Rance: “That all men are created equal.” That’s fine, Pompey.
Pompey: I knew that, Mr. Rance, but I just plumb forgot it.
Rance: That’s all right, Pompey. A lot of people forget that part of it.

The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > CourthouseObserver Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > I had a couple of hour-long break in my
> > schedule
> > > this morning, and so I decided to drop into
> > > Fairfax County Circuit Courtroom 4F to
> observe
> > as
> > > much as I could of today's proceedings in the
> > case
> > > of Misery v. Eesh.
> >
> >
> > No, the judge didn't enter the courtroom until
> > 10:20, and it was well past 12:00 when I got
> > finished. You weren't there because you "had a
> > break."
> >
> >
> > > My Bottom-Line take on the situation is
> that
> > Eesh
> > > is in a lot of trouble here.
> >
> >
> > No, not actually, but keep wishing that if it
> > makes you feel better.
> >
> >
> > > First, the atmospherics...
> > >
> > > The court was entertaining pretrial and
> > > interlocutory motions, rather than conducting
> > > trials and so, for the most part, those
> present
> > in
> > > and addressing the court were attorneys for
> > > plaintiffs and defendants who were arguing
> > their
> > > motions before the court.
> >
> >
> > It was just a motions day. Very mundane and
> mostly
> > continuances before we got to be heard. If your
> > idea of entertainment is listening to attorneys
> > asking for continuances, more power to you.
> >
> >
> > > Eesh was there, accompanied by Lizzy, and
> > they sat
> > > together in the back row until their case was
> > > called.
> >
> > > Eesh was smartly dressed, with well-pressed
> > Khaki
> > > pants, a blue blazer, a dress shirt and tie.
> > Lizzy
> > > was conservatively dressed in black in what
> > > appeared to be business attire and running
> > shoes.
> > > While Lizzy sat beside him for much of the
> time
> > > that the court was in session, she left the
> > > courtroom occasionally (to make phone calls,
> I
> > > believe) and returned each time. Indeed, she
> > > actually was out of the courtroom when the
> > Misery
> > > v. Eesh case was called before the judge and
> > > missed most of the proceedings.
> >
> >
> > I get it, you were there and you really want us
> to
> > know you saw us.
> >
> >
> > > Someone who I assumed was Misery was
> there,
> > as
> > > well, sitting by himself dressed much more
> > > casually.
> >
> >
> > No, the plaintiffs weren't there, just the
> > attorney. It was just a motions day.
> >
> > > Misery's attorney was unconventional in
> his
> > > appearance, in that he had long, flowing hair
> > and
> > > a good amount of facial hair. But he was
> > > professionally dressed in a dark suit, dress
> > > shirt, tie, and pocket square, and he
> comported
> > > himself well professionally during and after
> > the
> > > proceedings.
> >
> > Again, you proved your point. You were there,
> > congratulations.
> >
> >
> > > The biggest surprise for me, though, was
> that
> > Eesh
> > > was appearing pro Se, which (for the few FFX
> > > Underground users who are not attorneys)
> means
> > he
> > > was without counsel.
> >
> >
> > This was already known on the site.
> >
> > > The purpose of today's proceedings was for
> > the
> > > court to hear arguments and rule on a motion
> by
> > > Eesh's attorney for summary judgement in the
> > case.
> >
> >
> > No, it was a motion for default judgement.
> Summary
> > judgement is entirely different.
> >
> >
> > > As best as I can understand it (I did not
> > speak
> > > to any of the parties after the proceedings
> to
> > > confirm this), the motion was predicated on
> the
> > > fact that Eesh did not file a response to the
> > suit
> > > within the time period required by law and
> > still
> > > had not filed a response.
> >
> >
> > You should have listened more instead of noting
> > how I was dressed.
> >
> >
> > As a general matter,
> > > when this occurs, a plantiff (the charging
> > party)
> > > will ask the court to enter a summary
> judgement
> > > against the defendant (the person who is
> being
> > > sued) and in favor of the plaintiff.
> >
> >
> > Charging party? LOL You mean moving party.
> Again,
> > default judgement, not summary judgement.
> >
> >
> >
> > > Eesh's "defense" to the motion for summary
> > > judgement was to file a motion of his own,
> > asking
> > > the judge to quash service (ask the judge to
> > rule
> > > that he, the defendant, had not been properly
> > > served or given notice of the suit and/or not
> > > given proper notice of the motions filed by
> the
> > > plaintiff).
> >
> >
> > It wasn't a defense. It's called a motion to
> quash
> > process pursuant to § 8.01-277. You should
> have
> > listened more.
> >
> >
> > > Misery's attorney presented a compelling
> case
> > in
> > > favor of his motion for summary judgement,
> > > asserting that the suit and notice had been
> > > properly served by the Sheriff, offering the
> > court
> > > proof of the same, and asserting that Eesh
> had
> > not
> > > responded to the suit in the proper
> timeframe.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > No, I responded in a timely manner, noting the
> > incomplete service. § 8.01-296(2)(b) lays out
> > what is needed when the service is posted to a
> > door of an abode.
> >
> > Again, you should have been listening.
> >
> >
> > He
> > > asked that, in the alternative, if the judge
> > > declined to make a summary judgement in favor
> > of
> > > Misery, that she award Misery $1,900 in
> > attorneys
> > > fees and costs that had been incurred so far
> to
> > > research, prepared, file, and argue the
> motions
> > > and that said fees and costs be paid as a
> > > precondition to allowing Eesh to continue in
> > the
> > > case without summary judgement.
> >
> >
> > That's not what he said. LOL at "precondition".
> At
> > this point you are making things up.
> >
> >
> > > Appearing on his own behalf, Eesh offered
> no
> > > defense to not having responded to the suit.
> > > Instead, contended that he had not been
> > properly
> > > served and asked the judge to quash
> > service.
> >
> >
> > You don't defend yourself on motions day, you
> > explain what happened. It's not a defense, and
> the
> > judge accepted my explanation.
> >
> >
> > > The judge agreed with Misery's attorney
> that
> > > service had been properly made; that Eesh had
> > not
> > > responded at all, let alone within the
> > timeframes
> > > required by law; and that grounds were there
> > for
> > > summary judgement.
> >
> >
> > No, this is more bullshit from you. The judge
> > noted the service was incomplete, as the steps
> > laid out in § 8.01-296(2)(b) had not been
> > followed. She also noted that I did respond,
> and
> > she even said that default judgement cannot
> occur
> > when service is posted to a door of an abode.
> >
> > She indicated however, that
> > > she was reluctant to do so in this instance
> at
> > > this time, in part because Eesh was appearing
> > Pro
> > > Se.
> >
> >
> > More bullshit from you. The fact I was there
> Pro
> > Se had no impact on her ruling against the
> motion
> > for default judgement, or summary judgement as
> you
> > are determined to call it.
> >
> >
> > She castigated Eesh for not responding to
> the
> > > suit, as well as for his motion to quash
> > service
> > > -- both on the merits of the motion and for
> his
> > > failure to properly file it.
> >
> >
> > Castigated? Not at all. The motion to quash
> > process had merits, which why she didn't deny
> it.
> >
> >
> > > Eesh appeared confused about the
> legalities
> > of the
> > > situation he is in and of what he needs to do
> > in
> > > order to defend himself, saying several times
> > that
> > > he has no legal training; that he is
> attending
> > > school on the GI Bill and has no money for
> > > attorneys; and that he had consulted an
> > attorney
> > > who wanted $10,000 from him to take the case,
> > > which he did not have.
> >
> >
> > Seriously LOL Where are you getting this from?
> >
> >
> > > The judge was having none of it.
> >
> >
> > Actually, she was very laid back and friendly,
> but
> > we'll go along with your melodramatic story.
> >
> >
> > > She told him that he was gambling by not
> > having
> > > counsel and that, at the very least, he needs
> > to
> > > talk with one. She quizzed him on several
> > aspects
> > > of court procedure. He was unable to
> > > satisfactorily answer her.
> >
> >
> > Again, listen more, dramatize less. The lawyer
> > called me a gambler for acting pro se.
> >
> >
> > > In the end, she cut him a MAJOR break.
> >
> >
> > ...but you just said "she was having none of
> > that."
> >
> >
> >
> > > She denied both the motion for summary
> > judgement
> > > and the motion to quash service.
> >
> >
> > She denied the motion for default judgement,
> the
> > motion to quash service will be heard again.
> >
> >
> >
> > However, she
> > > gave Eesh ten days to either respond to the
> > suit
> > > or properly file a motion to quash service,
> > > whichever he chose to do. On the request by
> > > Misery's attorney for attorneys fees, she
> > denied
> > > that request without prejudice, saying that
> the
> > > attorney could bring that up again at the
> > > appropriate time.
> >
> >
> > Again, your story doesn't add up. You say she
> > denied the motion to quash process, now you say
> > she is allowing 10 days to refile. You can't
> have
> > both.
> >
> >
> > > Eesh is in trouble.
> > >
> > > My free legal advice to him is ...
> >
> >
> >
> > Free legal advice from an e-lawyer. This is
> going
> > to be good.
> >
> > > First, get an attorney. If you cannot
> afford
> > one,
> > > SURELY you can find a First Amendment
> attorney
> > > (ACLU, perhaps?) who would do it for free.
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Sounds like you have experience with crying to
> the
> > ACLU for help. Let me guess, your civil rights
> > were trampled upon at one point.
> >
> >
> > This
> > > is a significant case that could have
> > implications
> > > far beyond FFX Underground
> >
> > Don't kid yourself. This is a vexatious
> lawsuit,
> > pure and simple.
> >
> >
> > > Misery's attorney is good. You
> > > have little hope of prevailing if you are not
> > > represented, as well.
> >
> >
> > Fortunately, you don't know what I've been told
> by
> > the attorneys that I have consulted.
> >
> >
> > > Second, stop posting on Fairfax
> Underground
> > until
> > > this suit is over. Nothing you could
> possibly
> > > post can help you. But you have no idea how
> > > things you might post might hurt you.
> >
> >
> > I know you want me off the site, and I know
> that
> > it pains you that I have never been banned, but
> > try harder with the pseudo-advice.
> >
> >
> > > Third, as wonderful a person as Lizzy
> might
> > be (I
> > > offer neither an endorsement nor a
> commendation
> > of
> > > her), you might not want to show up with her
> in
> > > court.
> >
> >
> > She has no part in this suit, she was there to
> > take care of something.
> >
> >
> > If you want her to be a witness for you,
> > > she might not be permitted to testify on your
> > > behalf if she has been prejudiced by viewing
> > prior
> > > proceedings.
> >
> >
> > You mean......she could be impeached as a
> witness?
> > Is that what you are attempting to say?
> >
> >
> > And she DOES have pending felony
> > > charges against her (although, from what I
> can
> > > tell, those charges might well be bogus).
> > >
> > > More later...
> >
> >
> > ...and that has no relation to this suit.
> Somehow
> > that escapes you.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > So, the gist from this is, you wrote a lot of
> > bullshit, you clearly weren't listening. You
> were
> > more interested in taking note of what I was
> > wearing than actually listening to the motion.
> > You also want me off the site and want me to
> stop
> > associating with lizzie. Basically, you are
> > threatened by our presence on the site, but not
> > threatened enough to sit by us in person.
>
>
>
>
>
> interior/final scene:
>
>
> Ransom Stoddard: "You're not going to use the
> story, Mr. Scott?"
>
> (Ransom Stoddard, standing by the printing press,
> having just finished explaining the truth--that
> the late, good-hearted rancher Tom Donophin
> actually shot outlaw Liberty Valance, not him; a
> draft of newsman Maxwell Scott's story sits on the
> bureau, just out of Ransome's view)
>
> Maxwell Scott: "This is Fairfax Underground, sir.
> When the legend becomes fact, print the legend."
>
> (Maxwell Scott picks up the draft lying on the
> bureau, then pauses a moment, grunts and stops in
> his tracks, brow furrowed suddenly and
> inexplicably; slowly, turns back around to face
> Ransom, incredulity written in his face)
>
> Maxwell Scott: "Shit, Ranse....I don't reckon we
> got enough ink in all of Fairfax to print even
> this here legend, though....you sure this is how
> it happened? Let me look at my notes....something
> mighty off about this here draft...wait just a
> second..."
>
> (eyes scanning over the draft, a look of horror
> replaces the incredulity)
>
> Maxwell Scott: "Ransome....this ain't my draft at
> all, it's--it's--"
>
> (Liberty Valance suddenly rises from his grave,
> bursts through the doors and whips out his
> mossberg; shoots Stoddard and Scott dead; begins
> printing the story anyway)
>
> Liberty Valance (in Sergio Leone-style close-up):
> "Well, 'pilgrim'...ya' wanna say that yella'
> bellied lilly livered egg-suckin' dog Tom Donophin
> actually shot the great Liberty Valance?
> Heh...'that'll be the day'..."
>
> (close-up of blood-soaked Liberty Valance-drafted
> story, swapped out with Scott's original
> draft...printing press in motion)
>
>
> end(?)
>
> /

XvPud Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Okay, that's pretty cool.
>
> Triumph of Liberty Valance = Rise of Obama's
> lawless thug political regime.
>
> Still, if Tom D's hand shot up through that coffin
> lid, grabbed Vera Miles and dragged her down to
> hell, that might be pretty cool, too.
>
> And maybe Pompey does a voodoo ceremony on the
> side that brings Liberty Valance back to life.
>
> src="https://idreamedmovies.files.wordpress.com/20
> 08/07/pompey.jpg">

> Pompey: It begun with the words, uh…
> “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that,
> uh, that…”
> Rance: “That all men are created
> equal.” That’s fine, Pompey.
> Pompey: I knew that, Mr. Rance, but I just
> plumb forgot it.
> Rance: That’s all right, Pompey. A lot of
> people forget that part of it.

Durf46816461946383 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > eesh's legal defense Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Eesh let me summerize in basic terms that you
> > > understand what the judge said to you.
> > >
> > > You got some nerve with no lawyer. You're an
> > idiot
> > > for not having a lawyer. You got ten days to
> > play
> > > ball and lawyer up or that's your ass.
> > >
> > > Do we understand each other bitch? Now get
> the
> > > fuck out.
> >
> > That's not what was said...
>
> Stenographer there? I'm sure we can get a
> transcript in a few weeks or so.


Anyone know? Call eesh out on his bullshit.

Durf633636173(4728 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What exactly is it you do other than stalk
> people on FFXU? You are some sort of professional
> community college student?


LMAO

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> uberX Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > If I know Fairfax Underground like I think I
> do,
> > it'll be hard to find a seat at the next
> > proceeding.
>
>
> Please do, I encourage all to come and check it
> out.


you were creeped out by one person going