Fore! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Being discussed for years, now may actually
> happen. Will include the private financing,
> design and construction and ultimately the
> operation of a state of the art year round target
> golf range and restaurant.
>
> No cost to the public, no impact on Burke Lake
> itself, and increased revenue to the Park
> Authority, which desperately needs money for all
> the other recreational uses that people want for
> free.
>
> Details here:
>
>
http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/parks/plandev/downloa
> ds/burke-lake-golf-kc-ppea_proposal.pdf
>
> But not so fast. There is also the NIMBY group who
> would rather follow a strategic patience approach
> and let it all crumble:
>
>
https://www.change.org/p/fairfax-county-park-autho
> rity-save-burke-lake-park/u/9664861
the sale of parkland is illegal under the laws of park systems the same ammount of land must be added back TO the park system elsewhere
ITS MY MONEY. NOT BULL-O-VA GOVS MONEY. IF THEY SELL IT AND INCREASE THEIR PAYCHECKS OF COURSE I'M SUING
the fact of the county operating several golf courses "government owned" is illegal in the usa to begin with
this isn't a pattern with bull-o-va push and shove gov: its apparently all they do is to disperse gov land and money amongst themselves and stalk the citizens