You were wrong- time to get over it.
Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> TheMeeper Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Registered Voter Wrote:
> > >>> So you have nothing to add to the actual
> > topic.
> >
> > I'm adding to the topic by pointing out that
> what
> > you are saying is incorrect.
> >
>
> No, you expressed your opinion as well since you
> said nothing factual to back up your "questions"
> that what I was saying was not something you
> believed. If you don't believe it, that is fine.
> If you want to point out something that I said was
> incorrect, then feel free to prove your point. If
> you want to express your opinion on the topic that
> would probably be better.
>
> >
> > >>> Do you have any insight on why Koreans in
> the
> > area would or wouldn't support McCain?
> >
> > No. But unlike you, I'm not going to make up
> > stuff to get my point across.
> >
>
> No, unlike many posters, you are just posting to
> troll. That is much of the definition of troll on
> BB/forums.
>
> Wikipedia:
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)
>
> "An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet
> slang, is someone who posts controversial and
> usually irrelevant or off-topic messages in an
> online community, such as an online discussion
> forum or chat room, with the intention of baiting
> other users into an emotional response[1] or to
> generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.[2]"
>
> If you aren't expressing your opinion on the
> topic, and all you do is come in to question other
> people's posts or opinions, with the then "stated"
> objective of making them prove you are somehow
> wrong in asserting they cannot possibly be right,
> you are trolling.
>
> > >>> Or are you just posting to troll?
> >
> > Asking you to back up your argument is not
> > "trolling". It was an honest request to see if
> > you had a valid point. And obviously you did
> not,
> > otherwise you would be addressing the original
> > question.
>
> You made it appear as if I was stating a fact, and
> with that in mind you then made a "request" for me
> to prove my "fact". If I then restate what I am
> saying to clarify my point, you deride that for
> some other reason. You never address the topic. If
> you want to refute what I am saying as factual and
> be on topic you would need a point of reference
> such as the fact that you know "why do more than
> 80% of Koreans in Fairfax/Arlington support McCain
> instead of Obama?" What you did by definition, is
> "troll" by stating something irrelevant to the
> topic. And again, I did address the original
> question, you still have not.
>
> I am pretty sure we could go through many of the
> threads here and see the exact same behavior
> repeated over and over again on your part.