um, sure. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> pethetic yiur argument is Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ur words dont make sense Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > wrong-O Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > why knot Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Troofer Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > The democrats want gun control because
> it
> > > > > equates
> > > > > > to people control. Imagine a black
> person
> > > > being
> > > > > > gunned down by a cop, people
> protesting,
> > > and
> > > > > the
> > > > > > authorities shoot the protesters. You
> > know
> > > > why
> > > > > > this generally doesn't happen? Because
> > the
> > > > > > government knows currently that public
> > > > > > reinforcements would come in and it
> would
> > > be
> > > > > civil
> > > > > > war due to human rights violations.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The government doesn't care about Billy
> > > > shooting
> > > > > a
> > > > > > kid at school. The government doesn't
> > care
> > > > > about
> > > > > > some hillbilly retard or mentally
> > unstable
> > > > > idiot
> > > > > > shooting up a group of people. They
> want
> > > you
> > > > to
> > > > > > think they care. All to save the kids.
> > It's
> > > > > about
> > > > > > the kids. Hearts and prayers.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What the government actually cares
> about
> > is
> > > > > > Shaquan, Billy, David, Melissa, and
> 1,000
> > > > other
> > > > > > people standing up to a government that
> > > > > violates
> > > > > > your rights as a citizen and as a
> human.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
Banning guns, weakening the people
> as
> > a
> > > > > "militia",
> > > > > > and giving power to a bunch of fucking
> > > > retards
> > > > > who
> > > > > > were sadly elected to represent us is
> > just
> > > > the
> > > > > > beginning of you losing your rights
> given
> > > to
> > > > > you
> > > > > > under the constitution. If you want to
> be
> > > > Hong
> > > > > > Kong, keep giving the government
> retards
> > > more
> > > > > > power.
> > > > >
> > > > > It says 'well regulated militia' and the
> > > > founders
> > > > > did not envision 16 year olds wondering
> > > around
> > > > > with assault-style rifles with high
> > capacity.
> > >
> > > > If
> > > > > 'militia' meant individuals access to any
> > > > weapon
> > > > > why are we not allowed to carry C4, hand
> > > > grenades
> > > > > and flame throwers?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Its also says, "being necessary to the
> > security
> > > of
> > > > a free State, the right of the people to
> keep
> > > and
> > > > bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
> > > >
> > > > A militia at the time was every willing
> > > > able-bodied man in a community.
> > > > A State at the time meant individual
> states,
> > > not
> > > > the federal government.
> > > > The people at the time meant individuals,
> not
> > > > groups or militias.
> > > > Keep at the time meant own for their
> personal
> > > > use.
> > > > Bear at the time meant carry and have ready
> > > when
> > > > the need arises.
> > > > Arms at the time meant whatever weapon the
> > > people
> > > > wanted to keep and bear.
> > > > Shall not at the time meant under no
> > > > circumstances.
> > > > Infringed at the time meant regulated or
> > > > compromised.
> > > >
> > > > An armed citizenry, capable of overthrowing
> a
> > > > tyrannical government, is the essence of
> the
> > > 2nd
> > > > amendment. That is what the guys who wrote
> > it
> > > had
> > > > just done and very well understood the
> > meaning.
> > >
> > > Do you actually think 'armed citizenry' in
> the
> > USA
> > > is 'capable of overthrowing' the United
> States
> > of
> > > America? How would that work when tens of
> > > thousands of trained US armed forces, US
> tanks
> > and
> > > attack helicopters get rolled out? Are you
> and
> > > your friends going to stop an M1 Bradley with
> > your
> > > assault-style rifles with bump-stocks?
> > >
> > > lol
> >
> >
> > Did you know American citizen own more ARs than
> > the military has M16/M4s? By quite a bit too.
> Plus
> > we are better supplied with ammo. The BATFE has
> > said this, not a news source that isn't on your
> > approved list. And every single time the all
> > volunteer American military is asked if they
> would
> > fire upon their own countrymen, the asnwer is
> > always a resounding no. It is against the law
> for
> > the military to conduct police actions within
> our
> > borders. The American solder is required by
> > military code to disobey an unlawful order.
> >
> > A bigger concern for the American citizen would
> be
> > the national guard. But they have said they
> would
> > refuse to fire on citizens as well.
> >
> > If the socialist run DNC didn't plan on doing
> > things that would start a revolution in lesser
> > countries, civilians owning firearms wouldn't be
> a
> > concern.
>
> So citizens could violently overthrow the
> government and the military could not respond -
> you sound like a mental patient.
who shitposts lies daily
and yes, if the people truly get fed up with your type of bullshit,
they can overthrow the government. Your socialists in charge must agree
or they wouldn't have erected a wall around the capital building.
.
Attachments: