the whole point of the ban on child pornography was to prevent children from being forced to do sexual acts. if it's drawn, it's not forcing children to do said acts. what it boils down to is: would you rather have sexually frustrated pedophiles walking around (your children) or ones that get their rocks off to drawings?
im not supporting pedophiles but rather i'm going about it logically. doing acts of extreme violence is illegal but drawing disturbing pictures of it isnt, so why should it be any different for this case? (THINK OF THE CHILDREN!)
damn logic is always getting in the way of people's agendas!
"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."