State legislature Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Try harder next time Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > There was a nearly 40 acre change. That was all
> > that was claimed. That's what occurred. I
> suggest
> > you learn to live with that fact.
>
> I suggest you go fuck yourself, you dishonest
> douchebag. There was no material change in 2014.
> Exactly no PRIME REAL ESTATE became available for
> development. You omitted from your feeble post
> the fact that the city and its subdivisions
> already owned the bulk of the properties in
> question, and there were no plans at all in place
> to "develop" a site that had already been
> developed in 2005 to include the high school and
> middle school. You're just one sorry ass shill
> for one sorry-ass little village.
Actually, a good portion of that real estate became available for development.
It’s been noted by the city and outside entities.
https://www.fallschurchva.gov/1770/Campus-Project-Planning-for-Economic-Dev
https://nvar.com/realtors/news/re-view-magazine/article/may-jun-2015/2015-05-06-commercial-real-estate-falls-church-land-swap
In any event, your going outside the bounds of the original question and response.
To bring you back on course, you asked when in the last five year were the city's boundaries modified.
That question was answered with accurate information.
Your subsequent tangent to deflect from your mistake was equally unsuccessful. The land is being prepared for redevelopment and it is prime real estate adjacent to a Metro.