Wow, three posts in a row by our lying coward. One has to wonder where his animosity for Falls Church began. Speeding ticket on Broad? An inferiority complex fueled even further by his inability to afford a home in Falls Church?

Can you imagine the level of deep-seated butthurt that drives a person to post three different posts over more than a half an hour a feeble attempt to distract from his lies?

He even went so far as to impersonate a local blogger. How pathetic is that?

Word of advice, butthurt boy, citing events prior to the conclusion of the matter five years later is as much a winning strategy as lying about “area historians” ie. it’s a puss poor strategy.

Man oh man, you’re pathetic.

More ignorant butthurt. There is no debate here, moron. Falls Church got its sorry ass kicked. You are only continuing in that tradition of abysmal failure. As those with any actual understanding of relevant history know full well.

Abandoned by the courts and the Corps of Engineers, Falls Church was ultimately left no choice but to accede to a pennies-on-the-dollar buyout by the hated Fairfax Water. It was a stinging but well-earned defeat.

Hmmm..; Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> More ignorant butthurt. There is no debate here,
> moron. Falls Church got its sorry ass kicked.
> You are only continuing in that tradition of
> abysmal failure. As those with any actual
> understanding of relevant history know full well.

LOL! Someone’s extra butthurt this morning. Any other names you want to post under today? You’re such a massive fraud.

You’re right on one thing, however. There is no debate here. The fact that you cowardly resorted to lies indicates you know how weak your position is!

Please provide the names of the “area historians” that reached a consensus consistent with your position. If, once again, you refuse to do it, be man enough to admit you lied. It’s one thing to be a liar, but how can you live with yourself being a coward?

May 15, 2007
United States District Court in Alexandria
Senior Judge Claude M. Hilton presiding.

After hearing arguments presented by opposing counsel, Judge Hilton dismissed the City’s complaint in its entirety. There was no longer any legal basis or pretense for FCC's hold over people or property lying outside the city limits. How costly for Falls Church that decision would come to be.

LOL! Another piece of information from 2007 on a matter settled FIVE years later in 2012.

If you have to construct your arguments from lies and outdated cherrypicked information, you might as well admit defeat.

Can you provide us with names of "area historians" that reached a consensus on this matter? Why are you dodging the question like a coward?

Menu, please Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The loss of Burger King has only been compounded
> of late, as Falls Church also recently saw its
> premier dining spot -- "Meat in a Box" -- close
> its doors for good. True, ratings there had
> declined markedly in recent years, but there is no
> logical successor to turn to. Just another reason
> for the hungry to head out of town.

Sadly, this is true. It's actually kind of weird what a dining-out desert Falls Church is. Everywhere nearby -- Tysons, Vienna, the Mosaic District, Ballston -- can boast of very nice dining options, but Falls Church has virtually nothing at all. So strange.

Diners Club Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Menu, please Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The loss of Burger King has only been
> compounded
> > of late, as Falls Church also recently saw its
> > premier dining spot -- "Meat in a Box" -- close
> > its doors for good. True, ratings there had
> > declined markedly in recent years, but there is
> no
> > logical successor to turn to. Just another
> reason
> > for the hungry to head out of town.
>
> Sadly, this is true. It's actually kind of weird
> what a dining-out desert Falls Church is.
> Everywhere nearby -- Tysons, Vienna, the Mosaic
> District, Ballston -- can boast of very nice
> dining options, but Falls Church has virtually
> nothing at all. So strange.

Responding to your own post? That’s the tell tale sign you lost. That and the nonstop posting this morning.

What dining spots in Falls Church City would you recommend?

Amateur local historian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOL! Another piece of information from 2007 on a
> matter settled FIVE years later in 2012.

God, but you're an ignorant fuck! That 2007 decision blew the foundations out from under the totality of FCC's practices and claims outside the city limits, becoming the headwaters for the raging torrent that ultimately wiped FCC off the map. They lost Tysons. They lost Merrifield. They lost everything. All because of that 2007 ruling. Just the facts, ma'am, whether you were too stupid to follow along or not.

Diners Club Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What dining spots in Falls Church City would you recommend?

LOL! It's a fair question of course, but there is no viable answer to it. If one is in Falls Church and seeking a restaurant meal of even middling quality. the only choice is to decamp to some nearby jurisdiction that actually has such a thing on offer. Otherwise, it's Clare and Don's Beach Shack, the pizza place, or Elevation Burger at this point. Extremely Slim pickings at best.

Hmmm... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Diners Club Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > What dining spots in Falls Church City would you
> recommend?
>
> LOL! It's a fair question of course, but there is
> no viable answer to it. If one is in Falls Church
> and seeking a restaurant meal of even middling
> quality. the only choice is to decamp to some
> nearby jurisdiction that actually has such a thing
> on offer. Otherwise, it's Clare and Don's Beach
> Shack, the pizza place, or Elevation Burger at
> this point. Extremely Slim pickings at best.

The food at Mad Fox is pretty good, much better than the choices quoted above.

The Mad Fox mac & cheese is good. They even offer a mac & cheese pizza as the result. Otherwise, there's not much to boast over -- just another so-so wannabe brewpub.

I've eaten at the Mad Fox. I might do so again if my car broke down in front of the place. Otherwise, I didn't add it to my list, so probably not.

Hmmm... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> God, but you're an ignorant fuck! That 2007
> decision blew the foundations out from under the
> totality of FCC's practices and claims outside the
> city limits, becoming the headwaters for the
> raging torrent that ultimately wiped FCC off the
> map. They lost Tysons. They lost Merrifield.
> They lost everything. All because of that 2007
> ruling. Just the facts, ma'am, whether you were
> too stupid to follow along or not.

That's a fair description of the history, one which did indeed end quite badly for Falls Church. But I wonder why these acreage boasters have never taken into account the nine acres owned by Falls Church that they simply had to abandon back to Fairfax County? I see two possible reasons here...

1. Ignorance: They didn't know about it.
2. Deceit: They did know, but tried to cover it up.

It is of course only further black marks that can accrue from either one.

gmfgt

VV Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The food at Mad Fox is pretty good, much better
> than the choices quoted above.

It's pretty good by Falls Church standards. But your nearby Noodles & Company would be a better bet.

Seems like some have been run off here.

I've heard it had something to do with Trump and the Russians.

Wow, looks like our troll took a full day responding to his own posts. Pretty pathetic by any standard used.

We can talk about the many fine dining options in Falls Church once he names an "area historian" that supports his premise. For some reason, he can't/won't do that. (Probably because he knows he got caught in a lie)

Lather, rinse, and repeat. Different day, but still trying to pass off the same worthless shit. Want to hear what happened when Falls Church tried to appeal in Richmond? Actually, no, you don't, as they got their ass handed to them in spades there as well. Lost everything, everywhere. Including the nine acres they had to abandon back to Fairfax County. Lol.

Suck on it, loser.

Anateur local historian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We can talk about the many fine dining options in
> Falls Church once he names an "area historian"
> that supports his premise.

Bwahahahaha!!! You will never be able to do that, as the best eats in Falls Church City are last night’s KFC left-overs out of the fridge. They would of course have come originally from someplace like Arlington or Annandale.

Hmmm... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The Mad Fox mac & cheese is good. They even offer
> a mac & cheese pizza as the result. Otherwise,
> there's not much to boast over -- just another
> so-so wannabe brewpub.

they make a great double meat burger

Hmmm... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lather, rinse, and repeat. Different day, but
> still trying to pass off the same worthless shit.
> Want to hear what happened when Falls Church tried
> to appeal in Richmond? Actually, no, you don't,
> as they got their ass handed to them in spades
> there as well. Lost everything, everywhere.
> Including the nine acres they had to abandon back
> to Fairfax County. Lol.
>
> Suck on it, loser.


For some reason I didn't see the names of "area historians" you contend reached a consensus on this matter. That was your task and you failed. Is there a reason you are omitting that information?

The history has been posted in spades. All of it points to your being a worthless asshole. Falls Church went directly into the dumper from the first days of the Water Wars to the last. Ran into you when they got there.

Sietsema Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Anateur local historian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > We can talk about the many fine dining options
> in
> > Falls Church once he names an "area historian"
> > that supports his premise.
>
> Bwahahahaha!!! You will never be able to do that,
> as the best eats in Falls Church City are last
> night’s KFC left-overs out of the fridge. They
> would of course have come originally from
> someplace like Arlington or Annandale.


Could you be more stupid? Everyone knows that if you want fried chicken in Falls Church, you head down and pick up some of the highly acclaimed fried chicken from Liberty BBQ at Broad and Virginia. It's off the charts amazing. Of course, the entire menu at Liberty is can't miss.

Diners Club Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What dining spots in Falls Church City would you recommend?


Mountain Jack's, Bangkok-Vientiane, Charlie's Pizza, Rossi's, House of China, Ranch House, Frank's Place.

Hmmm..: Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The history has been posted in spades. All of it
> points to your being a worthless asshole. Falls
> Church went directly into the dumper from the
> first days of the Water Wars to the last. Ran
> into you when they got there.


I didn't see the names of "area historians" you claim reached a consensus on the matter. Can't you provide any?

I can only pity you at this point. You no longer have any sort of standing or credibility here at all. All of that is forfeit. All of the persons named above have indicted you and your simply nonsensical claims and stories concerning the Water Wars. You haver reduced yourself here to being no more than an outclassed, low-grade stooge.

6jjcx

Hmmm... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I can only pity you at this point. You no longer
> have any sort of standing or credibility here at
> all. All of that is forfeit. All of the persons
> named above have indicted you and your simply
> nonsensical claims and stories concerning the
> Water Wars. You haver reduced yourself here to
> being no more than an outclassed, low-grade stooge.

Nothing new here. As noted above, defenders of Falls Church City have been losing this battle since 2007.

Hmmm... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hmmm... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I can only pity you at this point. You no
> longer
> > have any sort of standing or credibility here
> at
> > all. All of that is forfeit. All of the
> persons
> > named above have indicted you and your simply
> > nonsensical claims and stories concerning the
> > Water Wars. You haver reduced yourself here to
> > being no more than an outclassed, low-grade
> stooge.
>
> Nothing new here. As noted above, defenders of
> Falls Church City have been losing this battle
> since 2007.


Responding to yourself is about as pathetic as you can get. It's a clear sign you know you've been defeated. That's pretty sad - even for you.

In any event, even though you posted multiple times, you've still failed to name even a single "area historian" that supports your claim. That's pretty telling considering you claimed they reached a consensus.

I suppose responding to yourself is all you have left given you've been caught in a lie.

It closed

Amateur local historian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Responding to yourself is about as pathetic as you
> can get. It's a clear sign you know you've been
> defeated. That's pretty sad - even for you.
>
> In any event, even though you posted multiple
> times, you've still failed to name even a single
> "area historian" that supports your claim. That's
> pretty telling considering you claimed they
> reached a consensus.
>
> I suppose responding to yourself is all you have
> left given you've been caught in a lie.

Pitiful kindergarten nonsense. But you’ve plainly shown here that you have no more in you than that.

Hmmm... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Want to hear what happened when Falls Church tried
> to appeal in Richmond? Actually, no, you don't,
> as they got their ass handed to them in spades
> there as well. Lost everything, everywhere.
> Including the nine acres they had to abandon back
> to Fairfax County. Lol. Suck on it, loser.

Just another boot up some asshat amateur's ass. FCC crushed in Alexandria, re-crushed in Richmond...

"Rulings of the US District Court in Alexandria may be appealed to the Federal Court of Appeals in Richmond. While filing deadlines are tight, matters often do not come before the Court for months. Thus the second battle of the Water Wars did not commence until 2008. The City’s appeal was heard before a three-judge panel on January 31. Judge Allyson K Duncan, writing for Judges Roger L Gregory and M Blane Michael who concurred, handed down a 12-page opinion on April 4 which affirmed Judge Hilton’s earlier ruling."

This is the sort of actual history that actual local historians tend to agree upon.

Wow, still responding to yourself. I guess it is lonely in that addled brain of yours. You've plainly demonstrated that you have nothing more than lies. You've been asked numerous times to provide the names of "area historians" that reached the consensus you claimed. You have failed to do so. That about sums up your failures here.

Lol! I’ve had your scalp hanging from my belt all week. You’ve been nothing less than slaughtered here, Mr. Pitiful.

Hmmm... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lol! I’ve had your scalp hanging from my belt
> all week. You’ve been nothing less than
> slaughtered here, Mr. Pitiful.

Not so much, but it's cute how you think that. You've been buried under your own lies for a week. You can't recover. You got caught in a lie and you've been feebly attempting to run away from it. You want to recover? Name the "area historians" that reached a consensus regarding the matter. Your failure to do just that will ensure your continued demise.

Too stupid. You’ve been shooting blanks from the beginning. It was easy to gut your sorry-ass carcass. You and FCC are each just dead meat. Wallow in it, loser.

Hmmm... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Too stupid. You’ve been shooting blanks from
> the beginning. It was easy to gut your sorry-ass
> carcass. You and FCC are each just dead meat.
> Wallow in it, loser.


You're entire argument is based on a lie. You can't avoid that simple fact. You're a liar - own it like a man.

Name the "area historians" that reached a consensus regarding the matter. Otherwise, continue to be called the liar you are.

Oh, and from the looks of things, you were made to play the fool about fried chicken too. The stink of failure has fully enveloped you.

Sucks to be you, you useless and badly beaten asshole. There are long histories of Falls Church failure in the Water Wars posted by me above. Written by jurists, journalists, and other actual historians of their times. None written by you, an utter ignoramus who has been repeatedly flogged here with the lash of his own vapid ignorance.

Hmmm... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sucks to be you, you useless and badly beaten
> asshole. There are long histories of Falls Church
> failure in the Water Wars posted by me above.
> Written by jurists, journalists, and other actual
> historians of their times. None written by you, an
> utter ignoramus who has been repeatedly flogged
> here with the lash of his own vapid ignorance.


You posts are nothing more than vapid drivel. You are a liar. You can't run from that plain fact.

Name an "area historian" that supports your contention.

We know you won't because you're a lying coward.

What we all know is that you are a useless, ignorant douchebag who’s had his sorry ass kicked around the block numerous times. Your cause here is lost beyond all hope of resurrection.

Hmmm... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What we all know is that you are a useless,
> ignorant douchebag who’s had his sorry ass
> kicked around the block numerous times. Your cause
> here is lost beyond all hope of resurrection.


See, you proved me right once again. You're a cowardly liar who can't back up his assertions. You never got out of the starting gate, so it's hard to see how you made it around the block.

Name the "area historians" that support your contention. Do you like being a liar?

There’s a slew of them taunting you above. How could you have missed all that?

Hmmm...vyi Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There’s a slew of them taunting you above. How
> could you have missed all that?


Umm no. Try as you might, you can’t run from your lies.

More and more pitiful with each passing post. Just a no-account loser, much like the hapless burg that was so decisively routed in the Water Wars, as so many have documented and attested to above.

Hmmm... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> More and more pitiful with each passing post. Just
> a no-account loser, much like the hapless burg
> that was so decisively routed in the Water Wars,
> as so many have documented and attested to above.


You're a liar that still fails to provide the names of any "area historians" that support your contention.

Hint: an editorial from a Trump loving rag hardly qualifies as an "area historian."

Perhaps you're too stupid to know what a historian is.

Facts are facts, dumbo. All of the individuals and sources above (including ones posted by you) agree on the facts and their across-the-board confirmation of your being just a useless ignorant asshole. Sucks really bad to be you.

Colonel Popeye Sanders Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Could you be more stupid? Everyone knows that if
> you want fried chicken in Falls Church, you head
> down and pick up some of the highly acclaimed
> fried chicken from Liberty BBQ at Broad and
> Virginia. It's off the charts amazing. Of
> course, the entire menu at Liberty is can't miss.

Liberty BBQ may or may not be an improvement over the Famous Dave's that it replaced, but it does NOT serve "fried chicken" in anything like the sense that KFC, Popeye's, or Chick-fil-a does.

Hmmm... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Facts are facts, dumbo. All of the individuals
> and sources above (including ones posted by you)
> agree on the facts and their across-the-board
> confirmation of your being just a useless ignorant
> asshole. Sucks really bad to be you.


Actually, they don't. Not to mention that they are cherry picked from events that occurred well before the conclusion of the matter. In any event, you've again failed to name the "area historians" that support your contention. You fail because you lie.

Brookmont Bob Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Colonel Popeye Sanders Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Could you be more stupid? Everyone knows that
> if
> > you want fried chicken in Falls Church, you
> head
> > down and pick up some of the highly acclaimed
> > fried chicken from Liberty BBQ at Broad and
> > Virginia. It's off the charts amazing. Of
> > course, the entire menu at Liberty is can't
> miss.
>
> Liberty BBQ may or may not be an improvement over
> the Famous Dave's that it replaced, but it does
> NOT serve "fried chicken" in anything like the
> sense that KFC, Popeye's, or Chick-fil-a does.

Go back to Maryland, Bob. Liberty serves "fried chicken" that is BETTER than KFC, Popeye's, or Chick-fil-a. It is traditional fried chicken on the bone (like KFC or Popeye's) that has been brined in pickle juice (like Chick-fil-a) and buttermilk.

They also make a nice fried chicken sandwich.

;

;

Amateur local historian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Actually, they don't. Not to mention that they
> are cherry picked from events that occurred well
> before the conclusion of the matter.

Actually, they do. And of course, I have presented facts from a variety of points along the dismal 'Trail of Tears' timeline that Falls Church stupidly chose to travel down. They never had a case. They unwisely forced the courts to slap them silly as a means of driving home that point.

"Twice defeated, the City declined to file an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, a move which likely would have had little chance of success, given the strength of the prior rulings and the absence of a dissenting opinion from any of the appellate court judges."

> In any event, you've again failed to name the "area
> historians" that support your contention. You
> fail because you lie.

Your phony claim of being an "amateur historian" yourself has miserably failed on every count save for the "amateurish" part. You've demonstrated no mastery at all of the relevant facts of the time, while cadres of qualified commenters have contributed here to making you look like the rank and ignorant asshole that you in reality are.

By the way, have you come up with an explanation for the missing nine acres yet? The choice seemed to be between ignorance and dishonesty. Neither would be a surprising choice.

Hmmm... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Amateur local historian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Actually, they don't. Not to mention that they
> > are cherry picked from events that occurred
> well
> > before the conclusion of the matter.
>
> Actually, they do. And of course, I have
> presented facts from a variety of points along the
> dismal 'Trail of Tears' timeline that Falls Church
> stupidly chose to travel down. They never had a
> case. They unwisely forced the courts to slap
> them silly as a means of driving home that point.
>
>
> "Twice defeated, the City declined to file an
> appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, a move which
> likely would have had little chance of success,
> given the strength of the prior rulings and the
> absence of a dissenting opinion from any of the
> appellate court judges."
>
> > In any event, you've again failed to name the
> "area
> > historians" that support your contention. You
> > fail because you lie.
>
> Your phony claim of being an "amateur historian"
> yourself has miserably failed on every count save
> for the "amateurish" part. You've demonstrated no
> mastery at all of the relevant facts of the time,
> while cadres of qualified commenters have
> contributed here to making you look like the rank
> and ignorant asshole that you in reality are.
>
> By the way, have you come up with an explanation
> for the missing nine acres yet? The choice seemed
> to be between ignorance and dishonesty. Neither
> would be a surprising choice.


LOL. You can't demand answers when you won't name the "area historians" that support your contention. Name the historians.

Your scant "facts" consist of a Trump loving rag and a piece written years before the matter concluded. You went on this tirade because you were too stupid to know the boundaries shifted. Keep it up though, I have no problem continuing to call out your lies and stupidity.

Lol. Your problems are with knowing what the fuck your are talking about. What you have NO problem with is being an ignorant asshole who gets the living shit kicked out of him day after day. Sources used above are from the right, from the left, and from the scrupulously non-partisan. What they all have in common is that they blow your sorry ass right out of the water. You’ve just been given one long and extremely uncomfortable enema here.

Hmmm... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lol. Your problems are with knowing what the fuck
> your are talking about. What you have NO problem
> with is being an ignorant asshole who gets the
> living shit kicked out of him day after day.
> Sources used above are from the right, from the
> left, and from the scrupulously non-partisan. What
> they all have in common is that they blow your
> sorry ass right out of the water. You’ve just
> been given one long and extremely uncomfortable
> enema here.

All you have to do is provide the names of "area historians." But, you continually and cowardly refuse to do just that.

You couldn't kick the shit out of a halfwit paraplegic.

From day one, you got trapped in your lie and have been wrenching in agony trying to run from the lie. Your problem, however, is that I won't stop reminding you of that lie until you own it like a man.

Oh, and it looks like you got your ass whooped on fried chicken too. You just can't win at anything.

You’ve been absolutely crushed at every turn here, Dumbo. You haven’t a case to make. You were too dumb and lazy to learn any of the actual history, thus exposing yourself to one horrific broadside after another. Falls Church City was simply demolished at every turn, as credible sources have all concluded. You’ve suffered only the same fate.

Hmmm... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You’ve been absolutely crushed at every turn
> here, Dumbo. You haven’t a case to make. You
> were too dumb and lazy to learn any of the actual
> history, thus exposing yourself to one horrific
> broadside after another. Falls Church City was
> simply demolished at every turn, as credible
> sources have all concluded. You’ve suffered only
> the same fate.


Provide the names of "area historians" you claim reached a consensus.

Figure out what fried chicken is yet?

Amateur local historian Wrote:
——————————————————————————————————
> Provide the names of "area historians" you claim
> reached a consensus.

Take your pick. Cited above are judges, journalists, and analysts from all over the spectrum. None are in your camp of ignorance. That’s all just you — stumbling, fumbling, and bumbling along.

> Figure out what fried chicken is yet?

Good luck with your new newly launched Chicken Wars. Perhaps you’ll fare better there than you have in matters related to the Water Wars.

Name the area historians.

The names are there. So is the shame they heap upon you.

Hmmm... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The names are there. So is the shame they heap
> upon you.


Post the names of the "area historians."

Shove it up your pitiful ass, you lazy loser-fuck. Sources for the range of posts that have raped and then re-raped your sorry self were posted along the way. Judges, journalists, legal analysts. And over in your corner, we have exactly one illiterate dope, an ass-clown who defames the profession by claiming to be an historian of some sort. You're not a historian of ANY sort at all. You're just a dickless phony -- a tawdry, ignorant dipshit who can't face up to the documented disgrace and failure of his tattered hometown.

And by the way, which was it again re the missing nine acres? Was it just a dullard's ignorance that brought about that oversight, or was it an act of deliberate dishonesty on your part? Either way, Falls Church got its ass very severely whooped in the Water Wars. They lost at every turn, meaning that you should just go fuck yourself.

Claude Hilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> But I wonder why these acreage boasters have
> never taken into account the nine acres owned by
> Falls Church that they simply had to abandon back
> to Fairfax County? I see two possible reasons
> here...
>
> 1. Ignorance: They didn't know about it.
> 2. Deceit: They did know, but tried to cover it up.
>
> It is of course only further black marks that can
> accrue from either one.

I've tried to follow up on this, but the forces of ignorance and/or deceit have so far not aligned with the cause. It may be that they are intent on pretending not to see a problem. Or perhaps they have been drafted now to combat duty in the raging Chicken Wars instead.

Responding to yourself again. Pathetically weak, even for you.

Let me make it clear for you as you seem to dense to get it.

Historian - a person who studies and writes about the past, and is regarded as an authority on it. Historians are concerned with the continuous, methodical narrative and research of past events as relating to the human race; as well as the study of all history in time.

Judge - a person who presides over court proceedings, either alone or as a part of a panel of judges.

Journalist - a person who collects, writes, or distributes news or other current information to the public.

A judge and a journalist (if you can even call the sources you cited as journalists) are NOT historians.

Now that we have that cleared up, name the "area historians" you claim support your position. If you can't, simply be man enough to admit you lied or are unclear what a historian is.

Brookmont Bob Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Colonel Popeye Sanders Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Could you be more stupid? Everyone knows that
> if
> > you want fried chicken in Falls Church, you
> head
> > down and pick up some of the highly acclaimed
> > fried chicken from Liberty BBQ at Broad and
> > Virginia. It's off the charts amazing. Of
> > course, the entire menu at Liberty is can't
> miss.
>
> Liberty BBQ may or may not be an improvement over
> the Famous Dave's that it replaced, but it does
> NOT serve "fried chicken" in anything like the
> sense that KFC, Popeye's, or Chick-fil-a does.


There is no question whether Liberty is an improvement over Famous Dave's. In the short time it has been open, I've been there many times and enjoyed their Barbecue. It's probably the best in the area.

However, after seeing the pictures posted here yesterday, I stopped on my way home and got the fried chicken. Holy fuck that shit was AWESOME. It's hands down the best in the region. I'll definitely be going back for that.

Dead man talking. And it’s all still worthless bullshit. Like the city’s legal team, you have no case at all to make on behalf of Falls Church City and nothing to counter the boatloads of authoritative reporting of the major battles lost by the city in round after round of the Water Wars. You have been beaten really badly here, and I would doubt that this is the first time such total humiliation that has come crashing down upon you.

So, you still can't name a single "area historian" that supports your contention.

Face it, you got caught in a lie and you've been buried under it ever since. You haven't recovered from that fateful moment. All you've done is flounder about with cherry picked nonsense. As if failing on this wasn't bad enough for you, you decided to fail on something as nonsensical as fried chicken.

It’s long been plain that you are just too lazy/stupid to have internalized any of the Water Wars facts and sources noted above — the ones that so plainly label you a hapless churl.

Your recent fowl fantasies meanwhile are a pathetic and transparent attempt at diversion. I wish you luck in your puerile attempts to make any of that seem meaningful.

You claimed "consensus among area historians is that Falls Church badly lost the Water Wars."

By your own admission, you haven't provided the name of a single historian that supports that contention.

Your argument is built on a foundation of lies. You then get obsessed on 9 acres. You even carried on a conversation with yourself on that. Falls Church got paid for the 9 acres. Just like when you sell a house. You get cash and you convey the property to the buyer. It's easy to see why a basement dweller like you doesn't get it.

Here's a hint, asshat, losers don't get $40 million and close to 40 acres for a non-performing asset. At the time of the transaction, the asset was worthless to Falls Church. Everything they gained was pure profit. In the real world, we call that winning.

But again, you started your little tirade because you were so uninformed that the city boundaries changed. You were as uninformed then as you are now.

Amateur local historian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You claimed "consensus among area historians is
> that Falls Church badly lost the Water Wars."

A consensus that has been documented in reams of evidence published by all sorts of sources over many years, all of it of course pointing out that the campaigns of Falls Church City were doomed and dismal failures that inescapably came to bitter ends. Sorry, douche, but your ass has been owned big time here.

> Your argument is built on a foundation of lies.
> You then get obsessed on 9 acres.

LOL! The nine acres are of importance only because you somehow failed to mention them in any of your acreage calculations. The only question was whether the omission was out of sheer ignorance, or whether there was deliberate dishonesty involved. It was always either one or the other.

> Falls Church got paid for the 9 acres. Just like
> when you sell a house. You get cash and you
> convey the property to the buyer. It's easy to
> see why a basement dweller like you doesn't get it.

Thank you for confirming that it was indeed simple ignorance that led to your omission of the nine acres. There was in fact no quid pro quo at all associated with these parcels. Under the terms of agreement ratified in November 2013, the City simply gave them up.

> Here's a hint, asshat, losers don't get $40 million
> and close to 40 acres for a non-performing asset.

The real and financial assets lost by FCC were performing quite well at the time. As were the workers that Fairfax Water carted off, leaving the City with nothing but their accrued pension liabilities. Gone as well of course were many tens of thousand of once and future customers, along with the ability to continue gouging people in padding City coffers. Yeah, that's "winning" alright! The City was actually just slapped silly in all of this.

> But again, you started your little tirade because
> you were so uninformed that the city boundaries
> changed. You were as uninformed then as you are now.

LOL! You were asked when these alleged boundary changes occurred as a means of inviting you into the very sort of hard-core beat-down that you have been "enjoying" ever since. You see, it isn't at all hard to spot a Falls Church asshole out and about and being an asshole. It's something that's been seen around these parts many times before.

Still can't name any "area historians" that support your contention. That's pathetically sad for you.

KFC, Popeye’s, and Chick-fil-a are chicken places. Liberty BBQ is a place that serves chicken. Know the difference.

Brookmont Bob Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> KFC, Popeye’s, and Chick-fil-a are chicken
> places. Liberty BBQ is a place that serves
> chicken. Know the difference.


Again, go back to Maryland, Bob. It doesn't matter what else each place sells. Liberty Barbecue sells a damn fine fried chicken meal.

You erroneously claimed that Liberty doesn't serve fried chicken.

You've been schooled on that one, son.

Do yourself a favor and head on over to Liberty and order yourself some fried chicken - if you can get a seat.

Amateur local historian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Still can't name any "area historians" that support your
> contention. That's pathetically sad for you.

LOL! The average one-trick pony would know to have a better trick that that. You've seen seriously skunked here, loser.

kdgtm

Hmmm... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Amateur local historian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Still can't name any "area historians" that
> support your
> > contention. That's pathetically sad for you.
>
> LOL! The average one-trick pony would know to
> have a better trick that that. You've seen
> seriously skunked here, loser.


Annoyed with the same challenge being posed to you? The solution is simple. Name the "area historians" that reached a "consensus" on the matter.

finger licking good Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You erroneously claimed that Liberty doesn't serve fried chicken.

LIAR

"What I said was -- "Liberty BBQ may or may not be an improvement over the Famous Dave's that it replaced, but it does NOT serve "fried chicken" in anything like the sense that KFC, Popeye's, or Chick-fil-a does."

You should have known that because those very words appear just above. But of course, the words "it does NOT serve fried chicken" do appear in there, so maybe you just decided to ignore all the other ones.

FOOL

Brookmont Bob Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> finger licking good Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You erroneously claimed that Liberty doesn't
> serve fried chicken.
>
> LIAR
>
> "What I said was -- "Liberty BBQ may or may not be
> an improvement over the Famous Dave's that it
> replaced, but it does NOT serve "fried chicken" in
> anything like the sense that KFC, Popeye's, or
> Chick-fil-a does."
>
> You should have known that because those very
> words appear just above. But of course, the words
> "it does NOT serve fried chicken" do appear in
> there, so maybe you just decided to ignore all the
> other ones.
>
> FOOL

Does Liberty serve fried chicken?

Amateur local historian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Annoyed with the same challenge being posed to you?
> The solution is simple. Name the "area historians"
> that reached a "consensus" on the matter.

Why do you seek that which you already have?

What you continue to lack of course is any evidence or semblance of an actual argument to suggest anything other than that Falls Church lost its shirt (and various other articles of clothing) in the great rape that was the Water Wars.

You also of course lack any proper explanation for your omission of the nine acres that were simply conveyed to Fairfax County by the 2013 settlement, or for your belief that a quid pro quo was involved. Briefly put, that was all just another major fuck-up by you, but not hardly the worst of the bunch.

Hmmm... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Amateur local historian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Annoyed with the same challenge being posed to
> you?
> > The solution is simple. Name the "area
> historians"
> > that reached a "consensus" on the matter.
>
> Why do you seek that which you already have?
>
> What you continue to lack of course is any
> evidence or semblance of an actual argument to
> suggest anything other than that Falls Church lost
> its shirt (and various other articles of clothing)
> in the great rape that was the Water Wars.
>
> You also of course lack any proper explanation for
> your omission of the nine acres that were simply
> conveyed to Fairfax County by the 2013 settlement,
> or for your belief that a quid pro quo was
> involved. Briefly put, that was all just another
> major fuck-up by you, but not hardly the worst of
> the bunch.

You have never listed a single name of an "area historian" that supports your contention. List their names.

Oh, and a sale is not a settlement. Smart people know the difference.

Amateur local historian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You have never listed a single name of an "area
> historian" that supports your contention. List
> their names.

You know them only too well by now!

> Oh, and a sale is not a settlement. Smart people
> know the difference.

"The settlement calls for Fairfax Water’s purchase of the Falls Church water system for $40 million, the reduction in water rates to customers in the Falls Church system’s service area, certain adjustments of the City’s boundary line with Fairfax County, the settlement of all litigation between them, and employment for Falls Church Water Utility employees."
-- Tripartite Press Release, Nov 20, 2012

The parties were not as pathetic as you are.

So, you can't list the name of a single "area historian" that concurs with your assessment of the situation? Got it. We're on page two here and you've not provided a name of an "area historian" that supports your contention. If you really want to win so badly, you'd provide a name. I guess you just like losing so much.

Amateur local historian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So, you can't list the name of a single "area
> historian" that concurs with your assessment of
> the situation? Got it. We're on page two here and
> you've not provided a name of an "area historian"
> that supports your contention. If you really want
> to win so badly, you'd provide a name. I guess you
> just like losing so much.

Pitiful. Like Falls Church City, you've got nothing left to say here at all. You should follow the city's example and seek to negotiate a settlement of surrender.

finger licking good Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Does Liberty serve fried chicken?

Do you still have your head up your ass? That was a rhetorical question by the way, the point of it being that, well...you've got your head up your ass. .

As for Liberty BBQ, let's realize that it's a johnny-come-lately minor league affiliate of Arlington's Liberty Tavern Group, a two-man LLC that has specialized in rehabbing fading and outdated buildings. What got them interested in FCC was not the wonderful business opportunity, but a cut-rate price on an unwanted 18th century building. Sort of a flea-market flip kind of thing.

Hmmm... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Amateur local historian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > So, you can't list the name of a single "area
> > historian" that concurs with your assessment of
> > the situation? Got it. We're on page two here
> and
> > you've not provided a name of an "area
> historian"
> > that supports your contention. If you really
> want
> > to win so badly, you'd provide a name. I guess
> you
> > just like losing so much.
>
> Pitiful. Like Falls Church City, you've got
> nothing left to say here at all. You should
> follow the city's example and seek to negotiate a
> settlement of surrender.

Name the "area historians"that support your contention.

Amateur local historian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Name the "area historians"that support your contention.

Gee, where have I heard THAT before, you pathetic little turd.

Hmmm..; Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Amateur local historian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Name the "area historians"that support your
> contention.
>
> Gee, where have I heard THAT before, you pathetic
> little turd.

Where have you heard it before? Not sure. People hear the spoken word and see the written word. I suppose it's entirely possible you're one of those mouth breeding morons that moves his lips when he reads. Perhaps you did it out loud once?

In any event, rest assured, you'll be seeing the same refrain many times until you provide the names of "area historians" that reached your so-called consensus.

Don't want to keep seeing it? Provide the names. Of course, it might be easier for you to stop acting cowardly and admit you lied.

Like your sorry city, you are just a total loser.

As was substantiated just above, the LIAR here is YOU. And the losers here are YOU and the depressed dining-desert called Falls Church.

Hmmm... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Like your sorry city, you are just a total loser.


Losers lie and you are a liar. Name the "area historians"that support your contention.

Lame-ass third-grade fag-boy. Once again, many sources were identified at the time their testimony was introduced -- testimony that you CANNOT REFUTE. Falls Church was wantonly savaged and obliterated in the Water Wars. They lost everywhere and everything. And everyone knows this but one lying local troll and asswipe who has IGNORANCE and DISHONESTY writ broad across his every worthless post. You can toss in CHICKEN as well in various cases.

Hmmm... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lame-ass third-grade fag-boy. Once again, many
> sources were identified at the time their
> testimony was introduced -- testimony that you
> CANNOT REFUTE. Falls Church was wantonly savaged
> and obliterated in the Water Wars. They lost
> everywhere and everything. And everyone knows
> this but one lying local troll and asswipe who has
> IGNORANCE and DISHONESTY writ broad across his
> every worthless post. You can toss in CHICKEN as
> well in various cases.


You claimed "area historians" reached a consensus. Name the "area historians" you are referring to. Judges, journalists and "legal analysts" are not historians. Name the "area historians" you referenced.

Diners Club Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's actually kind of weird what a dining-out desert
> Falls Church is. Everywhere nearby -- Tysons, Vienna,
> the Mosaic District, Ballston -- can boast of very nice
> dining options, but Falls Church has virtually nothing
> at all. So strange.

It's not so strange when you consider that Falls Church is basically a place that people drive through in order to get from one better place to another better place. There are no "destinations" in Falls Church at all, nothing that would be of any actual interest to those who have had the good fortune not to live there. Heck, they have to count on folks from Clarendon to provide something they can falsely claim to be a "chicken place."

Amateur local historian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You claimed "area historians" reached a consensus. Judges,
> journalists and "legal analysts" are not historians.

LOL! Yes, they are, you abysmally ignorant piece of shit. These are often in fact primary sources of history. How much of a fucking "amateur" are you? Your repeated attempts at hollow semantic gamesmanship have meanwhile only marked you as among the worst sorts of intellectual vermin -- the sort that is cowered by and cannot abide even the most basic tenets and strictures of sense and reason.

You have earned here nothing more than the contempt and disgust of every rational person to have read your sorry-ass words. Your efforts have only given new impetus to an acceleration in what is already a half-century decline in public regard for what's left of your Itsy Bitsy Teeny Tiny Little City.

So, piss off or fuck off -- take your pick and enjoy the ride, you pathetic douchebag loser.

Hmmm... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Amateur local historian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You claimed "area historians" reached a
> consensus. Judges,
> > journalists and "legal analysts" are not
> historians.
>
> LOL! Yes, they are, you abysmally ignorant piece
> of shit. These are often in fact primary sources
> of history. How much of a fucking "amateur" are
> you? Your repeated attempts at hollow semantic
> gamesmanship have meanwhile only marked you as
> among the worst sorts of intellectual vermin --
> the sort that is cowered by and cannot abide even
> the most basic tenets and strictures of sense and
> reason.
>
> You have earned here nothing more than the
> contempt and disgust of every rational person to
> have read your sorry-ass words. Your efforts have
> only given new impetus to an acceleration in what
> is already a half-century decline in public regard
> for what's left of your Itsy Bitsy Teeny Tiny
> Little City.
>
> So, piss off or fuck off -- take your pick and
> enjoy the ride, you pathetic douchebag loser.


A primary source of history is not a historian. You claimed "area historians' reached a consensus. Now, you are admitting that no such "area historians" exist.

Let me make it clear for you as you seem to dense to get it.

Historian - a person who studies and writes about the past, and is regarded as an authority on it. Historians are concerned with the continuous, methodical narrative and research of past events as relating to the human race; as well as the study of all history in time.

Judge - a person who presides over court proceedings, either alone or as a part of a panel of judges.

Journalist - a person who collects, writes, or distributes news or other current information to the public.

Thanks for playing. You sucked so bad, you don't even get a participation trophy, loser.

You lie has been exposed for what it is.

You convoluted feeble effort to mangle facts has failed miserably.

I see you're getting your ass handed to you about Liberty too. Smarter people would run away with their tails tucked between your legs. We know you're too stupid to do that.

There is no redemption for you at all. Not here. Not anywhere. You are just a worthless lying Falls Church dumbfuck. Those five words are the entirety of your resumé. Five words that would cover your failed City would be "Badly Lost the Water Wars." Some might contend that "Has no decent dining scene." would apply as well, and they would certainly have a point.

I still don't see a list of "area historians" that support your contention. If you really wanted to win as bad as you say you do, you'd provide that list of names. Alas, you just can't seem to do that.

Brookmont Bob Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> finger licking good Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Does Liberty serve fried chicken?
>
> Do you still have your head up your ass? That was
> a rhetorical question by the way, the point of it
> being that, well...you've got your head up your
> ass. .
>
> As for Liberty BBQ, let's realize that it's a
> johnny-come-lately minor league affiliate of
> Arlington's Liberty Tavern Group, a two-man LLC
> that has specialized in rehabbing fading and
> outdated buildings. What got them interested in
> FCC was not the wonderful business opportunity,
> but a cut-rate price on an unwanted 18th century
> building. Sort of a flea-market flip kind of
> thing.


That's a lovely history lesson, but completely useless and irrelevant. What the fuck does it have to do with whether or not Liberty serves tasty fried chicken? Because you're too damn stupid to come up with that answer on your own, I'll give it to you for free - NOTHING.

You do realize that it's obvious that you're responding to your own posts, don't you? Of course you don't because you are as dumb as dog shit.

Let's play along with your word salad though. What is the "sense" that KFC, Popeye's, or Chick-fil-a serve fried chicken?

Refresher course for LIARS and FOOLS...

KFC, Popeye's, and Chick-fil-a are all examples of "chicken places." Your newly-minted Triple-A Liberty BBQ is an example of a place that happens to serve chicken. Sort of like Sweetwater Tavern, 2941, or Shoppers Food Warehouse. Is that clear enough for you to comprehend? You certainly did bobble the ball the first time around. Come on, say something completely stupid now. We're all waiting for it. Hahahaha! You FCC dolts are really something!