>a troll post is different than a troll itself.<
Yeah, keep telling yourself that.
Your defense reminds me of the "logic" on display in this article:
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/33540
And who said wikipedia was the end-all and be-all of knowledge? It has a handy, and I think thorough and accurate entry on trolling. As far as updating it, go for it, if you think you can add a facet or nuance that hasn't already been covered, or correct an error. (And if you're saying the wikipedia entry on trolling contains errors, I would be interested to hear what you think they are.)
>while that is a non-standard definition (there really isnt one)<
The fuckhead thing was mostly a joke; obviously, "fuckhead" isn't a term of art in the way "troll" is. That said, there are plenty of fuckheads on this board, however you define the term. Yes, there's an issue of loss of nuance in text-only communications, but c'mon, a lot of shit on this board goes WAY beyond that.