HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Off-Topic :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: Uncle Sam 105q ()
Date: May 09, 2026 04:00PM

PULTE, DEMOCRAT BANKERS, COUNTY ARCHITECTURAL OFFICES, COUNTY EXECUTIVES WHO OWN PARTS OF MANY LOCAL BUSINESSES - ALL THOSE CATS - weaponized "roofing" - it's not just the china who weaponize products


THE CLINTON.GOV AIDED THE RAPID URBAN SPRAWL "golf course neighborhoods pervasive seen anywhere you look on google maps in usa" OF WEAPONIZED ARCHITECTURE and use of cheap materials. approved all of it. buyers have little choice - the bulk of homes are all urban sprawl all architectural there "is barely a choice" only a legally argued %chance you might have a choice when needed to buy/change/move homes


MyRoofer threw shingles off roof hitting AC. It doesn't work they say I can't prove they dropped anything on it. What is my legal recourse?

https://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/4492395.html

Meade's father has grounded him - meade is in crisis!

https://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/4490728.html


^^ $44,000 ^ v. as low as tar&stone old school $500 or even $12,000 good shingles - read more in the articles, also $24,000 than any cost estimator says it is: democrat millenial business crap wants over 2x more pay while gov workers also want 2x pay over nat. ave.


little red riding hood


Re: Meade's father has grounded him

Meade's father said, "for Christ's sake why couldn't you be an architect like your mother's friend's son."

^^ duration-peppercorn-cramer-roofing-scale ^

meanwhile - i'm not planning to be "like the architect" i wanna kill the architects


est cost to USA in roofing scams national average: $3.5 trillion every 20 years due to "architectural weaponization fraud" just on roofs - not including chinese water torture plumbing

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: 44yh4 ()
Date: May 09, 2026 04:08PM

democrats wants over 2x more pay while gov workers also want 2x pay over nat. ave - they usually are deeply intwined with owning local fraud businesses that collude on price and prevent competition with threats

BUT REMEMBER - THE $20K - $26K nat. ave. price (complexity margin) is for a complex roof

the cost over-run for "double costing stupid ass roofs" is $1.9 trillion

1,920,000,000,000 every 20 years

the cost over-run against flat roofs (where tar&stone or cheap rolled shingles apply) over $4 Trillion every 20 years

4,176,000,000,000 every 20 years

!! not including townhouses - add those in it's allot more in loss and fraud !!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: 4uh456ju ()
Date: May 09, 2026 04:09PM

i'm not planning to be "like the architect" i wanna kill the architects

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: 45yh4 ()
Date: May 09, 2026 04:10PM

(that's $208 Billion every year)

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: h4t6j54 ()
Date: May 09, 2026 04:11PM

(the article does mention nationional building code and foundation cost increasing or staying steady over decades)

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: 45yu4 ()
Date: May 09, 2026 04:15PM

the cost with healthy HOME dwellers/owners and little fraud, annually USA

$2.4 billion / year versus , $208 billion

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: 4y4u ()
Date: May 09, 2026 04:18PM

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR4CT6f0iN9Nrr3Sjabg31images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRz18PLlYwSvPkVIUCEgip

little fraud includes idea without architecture fraud - the roofing is allot cheaper to do

the article says there ARE TWO MAJOR STRIKES on families: democrat 2x price collusion and also architectural weaponization collusion

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: ju65j ()
Date: May 09, 2026 04:19PM

(the roof with slight angle is a whole lot cheaper than the ^^ roofs ^ with lots of architectural steep ^)

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: 5ji57k ()
Date: May 09, 2026 04:22PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: 45y45u ()
Date: May 09, 2026 04:26PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: jui7k ()
Date: May 09, 2026 04:32PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: 67k6 ()
Date: May 09, 2026 05:34PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: 6ik676 ()
Date: May 12, 2026 04:20PM

I KNEWLY FOUND OUT - NOT ONLY DOES THE ARCHITECTURE SUCK MIDEIVAL ASS


IT'S DANGEROUS FOR THE HARASSED "OVERTIME" WORKERS - who literally have to be on a mountain rescue mission daily tied up or die - AND THEY ARE PAID LESS THAN NIGGERS DRIVING AMAZON VANS

not cool

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: 6uh65u ()
Date: May 12, 2026 04:22PM

(i went all through looking into this during my college days and it's grown worse not better. and yes - back in clinton days early AOL days or altavist or google bbs or whatever it was - roofers were commenting about it. you wont see that today for ..... well many political reasons i would say)

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: 56uy5u ()
Date: May 12, 2026 04:24PM

hqdefault.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEmCOADEOgC8quKqQ

paid less than an amazon delivery truck worker and it's BY THE HOUR and he isn't hired daily unless a development is going up

mr gartia. i've been following some lessons from him mostly - and a few others on successful completion points

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: 5y754 ()
Date: May 12, 2026 04:28PM

(it's absolutely sick - he's risking his life over something done merely to weaponize a roof so that the homeower is forced to hire a company when the 17-22 year time limit pops up. and not paid like a search and rescue firefighter - quite the opposite paid like an amazon delivery person)

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: 56uy56ui ()
Date: May 12, 2026 04:30PM

Installing siding on a 3-story home requires specialized safety equipment, including scaffolding, extension ladders, and fall protection gear.

yea i don't see any scaffolding for mr gartia

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: 5u63 ()
Date: May 12, 2026 04:31PM

siding-contractor-installing-fiber-cemen

siding - different world

for God's sake - google reports these lazybones get the same pay as mr Gartia. it's just sick.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: y54u ()
Date: May 12, 2026 04:37PM

and consider the homeowner if they are facing eviction over "they cannot do the roof themselves" because of the weaponization

it's not just gartia that can suffer in this "new mideival ass world"

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: kkl67 ()
Date: May 12, 2026 05:04PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: ji67 ()
Date: May 12, 2026 09:44PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: yj536 ()
Date: May 13, 2026 03:39PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: hr5u6j ()
Date: May 13, 2026 11:29PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: jhu56k ()
Date: May 14, 2026 01:55PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: ujy6k ()
Date: May 14, 2026 04:19PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: h54j55j ()
Date: May 14, 2026 10:34PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: ujhr5ytj ()
Date: May 15, 2026 02:06PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: rbnn ()
Date: May 15, 2026 06:17PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: tht6j ()
Date: May 16, 2026 01:27PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: k7yl.,l67 ()
Date: May 16, 2026 02:19PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: hy5r6j ()
Date: May 18, 2026 04:29PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: jk6676776 ()
Date: May 25, 2026 01:32PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: uyh5j ()
Date: May 25, 2026 07:17PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: p;[9 ()
Date: May 26, 2026 01:14PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: ij67ko ()
Date: May 26, 2026 02:21PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: u7yj67k ()
Date: May 26, 2026 03:36PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: ik8i ()
Date: May 26, 2026 04:07PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: 5ujh56 ()
Date: May 28, 2026 01:30PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: kol67 ()
Date: May 29, 2026 02:39PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: huj65 ()
Date: May 29, 2026 07:33PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: jkkl67 ()
Date: May 30, 2026 01:07PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: 8ik78 ()
Date: May 30, 2026 01:37PM

so i mentioned (this article or perpaps a related thread)

that parents had specifically forbid me to "run a business out of their home"

after some dwelling on it, i now remember i had not just seen a web page and been stopped by CLINTON-ITE broken microsoft forms

i had actually contacted them and asked why i was being blocked. it was explained to me that "i had to own the P.O. Box, but PO BOXES weren't allowed, that using someone else's mail was not allowed", for various reasons such as lein on property ability of the state. i specifically inquired, "but people lease buildings" and i was told, "yes but they have name on lease which has a mailbox". i of course gave up on the questions there. i was also told i was not allowed to "do roofing or painting - i would have to state a specific business - that i would need two licenses for two businesses"

i was considering 1st roofing despite i had no truck i had a "trunk", or maybe painting (i then learned i needed an inspected truck for the ladder, however, and the likes of plumbing required "county licensed certification by clinton school system").

i did know from the local bank that they "no longer gave business loans". they refused to loan for starting a "ebay style website" before ebay was created. the loan structure was worse than credit card (and higher rate!). were i not to generate business and pay back in 30 days i would be .... clinton years - perhaps arrested for fraud. i also knew from news that customer lists are not easy to come buy could take years to develop not days: that starting a business no way to guarantee customers inside 30 days.

BUT THERE ALSO IS ALLOT MORE THAT IS HARD TO DOCUMENT TO MENTION. People were getting find jailed arrested in the area and on news in America (not Texas) for RUNNING BUSINESS ILLEGALLY OUT OF HOME. I had not studied much law at the time and had no money for a lawyer. but i certainly feared it i had no indication from any direction i should not fear it.

(i had a friend who had a business but partents had helped him start it, run it out of home, and let him use their address, name, and so on - even allowed a company truck parked)

so - pushed to "apply for jobs" - i was faced with corrupt oounty not hiring - which was the reason i was looking into starting a business to begin with. nothing open but "Chicken Out!" chick fillee jobs. the gov was hiring their kids - i was an eye witness having talked to young girls apply to whom they admitted their mom worked there - and businesses were hiring illegal aliens because "less liability" - corrupt fairfax,VA

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: 76i7667i6 ()
Date: May 30, 2026 01:40PM

(i had not just planned, having a little savings or maybe sell an instrument, to pay $150 license (had been $75 my friend said complaining) and $800 Yellow Book (advertising) and a little more if required (another $150 typical insurance was it?). i had actually done it all to where i was filling out forms, contacted Richmond why i was being stopped, and been turned down pushed out)

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: 78ok78 ()
Date: May 30, 2026 01:49PM

(i'd also mentioned elsewhere, that due to doing a roof when young - just a flat one - that when the home roof came needed replacing I wanted to do it (with dad's help) hearing it was "expensive" and constraining funds (he was too busy). i think it was like $9k first time, like $18k next time, and 3rd time i'm sure i heard bids were $40k (different home) and found out materials were more like $5k. but you know - some people don't want other people to succeed they'd rather force them to fail. answer was no all 3 times - the 3rd still in question but already got a quiet no and high pitch - i was considering more like doing one part not all - the easy part make a chunk on that - and as above - i did say i'd do it for cost simply to keep corrupt $40k bids from making any money then got lower bids "eventually" so decided maybe offer just do the smaller portion. but it doesn't matter. no all the way. Chicken Out! they would all rather tar and feather me - but i am not the best person to play that game with. i draw lines in the sand how much abuse and threats i'm willing to tolerate)

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: j56kj5 ()
Date: May 30, 2026 01:50PM

((as to the last paragraph not that i didn't work stupid jobs: i did - and they, intently vague they, continually injected threats and problems with that. but it wasn't that i didn't.))

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: hj5j65t ()
Date: May 30, 2026 01:53PM

(((you would then question legal avenues - which FFU has allot of articles proving that was done. coupled with the fact up until at least recently if not still: it's illegal to bring a case in VA unless you have cash to hire a VA certified lawyer. illegal to complain about govenrment or who - for anyone poor. this worked fine in VA (not unfair) unless job system has become absolutely corrupt)))

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: jkkm67 ()
Date: May 30, 2026 01:56PM

((((__ democrats used court systems to favor county and state in all suits and since clinton have wordpad'ed in laws firming in legal code added powers to prevail in all suits no matter how bad their actions. legal or not. FFU has many articles on it. i wasn't never legally active. but i do have a long list on it and money owed i'm sure they will never pay - they rather have a feudal war than pay i'm pretty sure. __))))

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: hj5j6uh65 ()
Date: May 30, 2026 02:03PM

^^ brutalistic architecture ^

democrat planned to benefit some and attack others

weaponized products


((TODO: note older homes which high pitch are usually much smaller and have something to hold onto in places. a tall guy can do those without ropes and death. newer homes have taller bigger roofs meaning they are far more dangerous - ie your just an uninsured asshole if your not using a rope since no insurance company will pick up that mess because they already paid claims and already told everyone "no more" yet the builders persisted to make it worse))

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: gh4h54 ()
Date: May 30, 2026 02:07PM

((not everyone is in a family where success in family is good. some families thrive on humiliation. they would show up to my crap jobs - start arguements - even try to get me fired - and not just once - and humilitate me infront of friends about working as a bumb))

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: 8ik776 ()
Date: May 30, 2026 02:19PM

(((((&_ so i did mention to the parental units that the county was corrupt and illegal aliens were a problem and the problem was not simply me not apply for work that there were significant road blocks and my injuries precluded a boot camp (at the time no special injury look asides were plausible). they would brush off deny it like i was lying but i believe, really, the enjoyed gloating over it as they continually acted to shut down opportunities that normal families would, i would guess, have tried to promote :)))))

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: 5ujh56 ()
Date: May 30, 2026 02:24PM

(((((((i knew some guys who'd cheated gov contracts to get work, of brief mention on FFU somewhere, broke laws, and used influences. but that was not available to me. and i had been raised not to do it. by people who .... perhaps didn't have my best interests in mind teaching me. yet - taking to to the words of say Mark Twain. pride is in some respects better than being a democrat no matter how it ends. Mexico is about to revert to a parliament system. to hell with them, to hell with that.)))))))

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: yh56j6 ()
Date: May 30, 2026 02:32PM

Meade's house now valued at $940,000 according to Zillow! 127 87 close to a million

https://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/4498016.html

so there was a point in those last few paragraphs. not only that despite a weaponized roof i'd actually do it just to prevent corrupt fairfax from making a dime off me.


it was that not doing it was like $100,000 lost opportunity on assets (in the big picture, accounting) - just thrown away

(having to do with claims like, "want a professional to do it to" while modern professionals are often non-english speaking and create problems old professionals did not - including in plumbing and electricty hvac - as i said - VA allows companies owned by rich county executives to hire certified persons only as consultants and use illegal aliens but as for me and business license: require $20k up front certification 4yr classes to get insured and registered as a business)

but you know if it's weaponized, all fucked up high pitch and even dangerous, they rob that opportunity from many people thus made themselves work. no different than a corrupt mechanic slicing a brake line with a razor to pick up work on a later date. and i've seen corrupt mechanics - that's on FFU elsewhere also. i've seen bosses threatening employees if they don't become corrupt. IN FAIRFAX - where the shit floats to the top.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: 5jh5j65 ()
Date: May 30, 2026 02:43PM

MEANWHILE, IN DUBLIN, which now has less Bards than Richmond VA does .....

"just a heads up but I have been having problems with Irish roofers trying to get me to do something about my roof. It doesn’t need anything doing and I have actually spoken to Devon and Cornwall police. I have just now at 9:30 pm had hassle from a different couple of Irish chaps a young man and look what looked to me like a child badgering me about my roof"

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: yhu54uj ()
Date: May 30, 2026 02:45PM

6804aeef059f274c8351b427_Roofers%20Allen

i'm unsure if this is the future or the past - but certainly different than here

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: 56uyh56 ()
Date: May 30, 2026 02:56PM

roof-replacement-in-progress-2.webp

a florida farm. we can see how conservative florida has become

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: 4y4u54 ()
Date: May 30, 2026 03:01PM

__________________________________________________________

Posted by:

hjn564


Date: May 30, 2026 02:48PM

__________________________________

Roofers-Near-Me-480x320.webp

when extra materials and time are not looked upon poorly, high pitch is a little different

__________________________________________________________

Posted by:

45uyh56


Date: May 30, 2026 02:51PM

__________________________________

tenweb_media_s24a7psgy.webp

probably threatened by employer not to ask to be tied. and probably also not insured. or maybe small roof and has significant scaffolding the camera isn't showing. take your choice

despicable

__________________________________________________________

Posted by:

yh56uh


Date: May 30, 2026 02:54PM

__________________________________

hero-roof-fallback.jpg

these european roofers are tied to the bosses truck. he pulls them off the roof if he hears them say anything that sounds like individual opinion. not all ropes are safety ropes in europe

__________________________________________________________

Posted by:

5y656u


Date: May 30, 2026 02:58PM

__________________________________

replacing-an-old-tile-roof-1.webp

like 220V - this style of work seems to be a recurring theme in europe

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: yjtkyt ()
Date: May 30, 2026 03:49PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: j6kk76 ()
Date: June 01, 2026 07:31PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: ky7l ()
Date: June 02, 2026 10:27PM

^

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: RE: more Clinton era scandals: ^^ Architectural roofs, for a healthy homeowner, cost 8,880% more - and cost that regularly ^
Posted by: ujh56j7 ()
Date: June 03, 2026 02:43PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **        **  **     **  ********   ******** 
 **     **        **  **     **  **     **  **       
 **     **        **  **     **  **     **  **       
 *********        **  **     **  **     **  ******   
 **     **  **    **  **     **  **     **  **       
 **     **  **    **  **     **  **     **  **       
 **     **   ******    *******   ********   ******** 
This forum powered by Phorum.