Poor Rush, his advertisers are dropping his show like hot potato. Bye bye Rush!

You Ignorant Asses Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wow. This thread certainly reminds women that
> there are plenty of ignorant, hate-filled men out
> there who would undo any progress we've made over
> the past 40 years. This is a real wake-up call to
> women. And thanks for helping reelect Obama.

I love fake sensationalized arguments.

Show me 1 place where someone of power is saying to outlaw birth control all together.

You women are more than welcome to get it, you arent however entitled to try and make religious institutes change their core values so you can have it free.

I couldn't care less about this stupid story, we have bigger problems in this country. But this whole story is full of hypocrisy from the media, where were they when people were calling Sarah Palin's daughter a whore? I didn't care about that story either, but you can't have it both ways. It's either wrong for both cases or it isn't.

Republicans can't talk about the economy any more so they need to make up some other issue.

Rush's comments may have just sealed an Obama victory.

Meanwhile, we Democrats will continue to make up stories about the economy in the hopes that most Americans are too dumb to discover the truth!

I will get back to my whining now.

Roadie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Republicans can't talk about the economy any more
> so they need to make up some other issue.

Or they believe in the first amendment and will defend religious rights not to provide birth control when they are against it.

> Rush's comments may have just sealed an Obama
> victory.

Anyone who just changed their vote because of a comment by Rush who is not in office or running for office, should lose their right to vote. His slut comment has been condemned by all of the GOP nominees.

Can we try this again with real facts next time? Or will we keep trying to make this into a GOP bashing issue despite his comments being condemned and this really being about an attempted erosion of first amendment rights so someone paying over a quarter million dollars for law school can get free birth control.

no she doesnt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> > Rush's comments may have just sealed an Obama
> > victory.
>
> Anyone who just changed their vote because of a
> comment by Rush who is not in office or running
> for office, should lose their right to vote. His
> slut comment has been condemned by all of the GOP
> nominees.

I can't imagine why women wouldn't vote republican...

EdRealtor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> no she doesnt Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > > Rush's comments may have just sealed an Obama
> > > victory.
> >
> > Anyone who just changed their vote because of a
> > comment by Rush who is not in office or running
> > for office, should lose their right to vote.
> His
> > slut comment has been condemned by all of the
> GOP
> > nominees.
>
> I can't imagine why women wouldn't vote
> republican...

So now Rush is running for office?

Should I find quotes of all the anti american things that individuals on the left have said or their terrorist ideas and that should be relevant even though they arent running either?

You vote for the person running if you have even half a brain. Robert Byrd called kids "white niggers" and he actually is in office. By your logic no white or black should vote for a democrat

Filthy Slut Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> All I can say is I hope all you fuckers taking the
> sluts side on this has a daughter grow up to
> testify before congress and the whole world that
> she can't afford all the spermicide and morning
> after pills it takes her to keep from getting
> pregnant.
>
> I'm sure all of you stupid fucks would be proud
> papa's and slut mama's
>
> Looking at the slut's pic, I would say the men
> attending Georgetown should testify right behind
> her demanding insurance cover the incredible
> number of boner pills it would take to do her in
> the first place. Also free double lined paper
> bags.
>
> I'm serious as shit about this.
>
> For all the dumbass libtard men out there
> supporting this cunt what are you trying to prove?
> Wanna get with her? Bet you do!
>
> It would be better if you would just stop being a
> faggot but that's unlikely.
>
> For all the women who support her congratulations!
> you're all slutty little stinky cunts too!

My, my my! Aren’t we angry!

What’s wrong sonny, can’t get laid? That isn’t Ms. Fluke’s fault, nor that of any other women. ‘The fault lies not in our stars, but in ourselves’. Perhaps if you weren’t a miserable wretch, things would be different for you.

If my daughter grew up to emulate Ms. Fluke I would be tremendously proud of her. Ms. Fluke speaks for the millions of women without a voice. She is a heroine by any measure.

Daddy's Little Girl Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If my daughter grew up to emulate Ms. Fluke I
> would be tremendously proud of her. Ms. Fluke
> speaks for the millions of women without a voice.
> She is a heroine by any measure.


No she doesnt. She speaks for people that knowingly attend religious schools and want to trample on their beliefs.

no she doesnt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>...Anyone who just changed their vote...

No, not "changed their vote" but instead "got interested and involved".

However, a Republican congressman just went on record saying something like "two young Republican ladies we had over for dinner just said they're not voting Republican now" so perhaps there are some vote changers, too.

The amazingly wimpy Imploding Party candidates who couldn't just use their own heads and say "That guy's a jerk" out of fear of HIS power totally deserve to be shown the door.

Disgusting.

no she doesnt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > Ms. Fluke speaks for the millions of women without a
> > voice. She is a heroine by any measure.
>
> No she doesnt. She speaks for people that
> knowingly attend religious schools and want to
> trample on their beliefs.

Georgetown University is not a 'religious school'. Seminaries are religious schools. G'town is a secular institution of higher learning that is affiliated with the Catholic church. There is a HUGE difference.

> ...a Republican congressman just went on record saying...

Pardon, that was a conservative "pundit" and former speechwriter for Bush who said that.

4 more years, II Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > ...a Republican congressman just went on record
> saying...
>
> Pardon, that was a conservative "pundit" and
> former speechwriter for Bush who said that.

And that matters how? It's still two more votes lost by The Imploding Party of No.

Quacker Goats Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And that matters how? It's still two more votes
> lost by The Imploding Party of No.

True.

Minimally.

Actually, the IPoN appears to be trying to alienate females young and old.

From all appearances, they're doing an excellent job of it.

Quacker Goats Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 4 more years, II Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > ...a Republican congressman just went on
> record
> > saying...
> >
> > Pardon, that was a conservative "pundit" and
> > former speechwriter for Bush who said that.
>
> And that matters how? It's still two more votes
> lost by The Imploding Party of No.


Dumbass. It was the OP correcting his mistake. You rabid leftist rabble eat your own in your hatefilled frenzy.

Daddy's Little Girl Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> no she doesnt Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > Ms. Fluke speaks for the millions of women
> without a
> > > voice. She is a heroine by any measure.
> >
> > No she doesnt. She speaks for people that
> > knowingly attend religious schools and want to
> > trample on their beliefs.
>
> Georgetown University is not a 'religious school'.
> Seminaries are religious schools. G'town is a
> secular institution of higher learning that is
> affiliated with the Catholic church. There is a
> HUGE difference.

Georgetown is a CATHOLIC institution. Don't kid yourself.

We all know now that Barak H. Obama is a Socialist. But just how devoted he is to ramming a socialist agenda down our throats during his reelection campaign. In fact, if you read most mainstream media accounts of where the Socialist stands on a host of issues, you might think is he is actually a Marxist. There has been much more discussion of Obama's "themes" of empowerment and unity than there has been of his damning of the economy as in his policy proposals.

Obama will let his true colors show in the the coming months as he becomes desperate as his handler gurus and their fellow campaign travelers on board begin to come unglued. Promising massive government assistance with the help of private businesses (help that never seems to be asked for when the donations hit hence "Socialist" Obama goes one better by promising to empower unions to organize ("intimidate") just about everyone: 30 year old College Student Ms. Fluck

When I get reelected ,
I will make sure that gas prices rise every time the cost of living does. I'll start by letting congress do what they do best again – and again thats community organize to bring down the middle-class.

And I'll finally make sure every American has affordable health care and birth control that stays with you no matter what happens regardless of religion or party by passing my plan to make insurance company's pay and make contraception illegal and abortion government run for anyone for free. But if a girl forgets to take her birth control pill the government will be there for her as effective method for abortions free of charge.

Thinking of jokes: maybe "Clear Choice", Rush's remainig sponsors, And support groups should ask for a free sex tape made by him and his wife since they are paying for his Viagra!!!

Daddy's Little Girl Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Filthy Slut Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > All I can say is I hope all you fuckers taking
> the
> > sluts side on this has a daughter grow up to
> > testify before congress and the whole world
> that
> > she can't afford all the spermicide and morning
> > after pills it takes her to keep from getting
> > pregnant.
> >
> > I'm sure all of you stupid fucks would be
> proud
> > papa's and slut mama's
> >
> > Looking at the slut's pic, I would say the men
> > attending Georgetown should testify right
> behind
> > her demanding insurance cover the incredible
> > number of boner pills it would take to do her
> in
> > the first place. Also free double lined paper
> > bags.
> >
> > I'm serious as shit about this.
> >
> > For all the dumbass libtard men out there
> > supporting this cunt what are you trying to
> prove?
> > Wanna get with her? Bet you do!
> >
> > It would be better if you would just stop being
> a
> > faggot but that's unlikely.
> >
> > For all the women who support her
> congratulations!
> > you're all slutty little stinky cunts too!
>
> My, my my! Aren’t we angry!
>
> What’s wrong sonny, can’t get laid? That
> isn’t Ms. Fluke’s fault, nor that of any other
> women. ‘The fault lies not in our stars, but in
> ourselves’. Perhaps if you weren’t a
> miserable wretch, things would be different for
> you.
>
> If my daughter grew up to emulate Ms. Fluke I
> would be tremendously proud of her. Ms. Fluke
> speaks for the millions of women without a voice.
> She is a heroine by any measure.


If you want your daughter to grow up and be a whore so be it. To just assume a vast majority of women agree with Ms Fluke shows how ignorant you are. believe it or not most women can pay for their own birth control and it isn't a huge consuming issue for them.

People like you make me sick to my stomach. It exposes the neanderthal thinking on the left not the right. It's left tard fuck sticks like you who think women are cum dumpsters only worried about cum protection, not the right.

If your daughter grows up to be a slut like you want I hope her name rhymes with Fuck like Ms Flukes does.

4 more years, II Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> no she doesnt Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >...Anyone who just changed their vote...
>
> No, not "changed their vote" but instead "got
> interested and involved".
>
> However, a Republican congressman just went on
> record saying something like "two young Republican
> ladies we had over for dinner just said they're
> not voting Republican now" so perhaps there are
> some vote changers, too.
>
> The amazingly wimpy Imploding Party candidates who
> couldn't just use their own heads and say "That
> guy's a jerk" out of fear of HIS power totally
> deserve to be shown the door.
>
> Disgusting.


Please dont bother commenting on anything I say. Nothing you say is true and you just turn everything into Obama is my lord and savior and the GOP is the devil type crap. You also just make up stuff all the time. Im not wasting any time responding to stupid stuff like this and just giving you the heads up now to save everyones time. If you ever want to try and act like an adult with a brain maybe we can one day have a discussion.

For example your line about interested and involved would imply that looked up what actually is happening and realized the bs hysteria being created by people like you. You believe its true. You are a waste of time to try and reason with. Try again under a new sn weisel and have something intelligent to say

Daddy's Little Girl Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> no she doesnt Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > Ms. Fluke speaks for the millions of women
> without a
> > > voice. She is a heroine by any measure.
> >
> > No she doesnt. She speaks for people that
> > knowingly attend religious schools and want to
> > trample on their beliefs.
>
> Georgetown University is not a 'religious school'.
> Seminaries are religious schools. G'town is a
> secular institution of higher learning that is
> affiliated with the Catholic church. There is a
> HUGE difference.


No theres not for this. Anyone at a seminary wouldnt be asking for birth control in the first place. Theres a huge difference in a religious school and a place you go to become a priest or nun. She knew the catholic affiliation going into the school and decided to go anyway. For the 100th time if she wanted it so bad she could have gone to another top law school with no religious affiliation. Shes also saying 3 grand a year is a financial burden when her schooling costs 90k a year, maybe pick a cheaper school next time.

Rush is the only one out there brave enough to tell the truth...
With WalMart selling birth control pills for $5.00 a month, why is it the apparently intelligent Georgetown Law student can't figure out a way to afford her birth control, jeez DC gives condoms away.

Rectumite Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rush is the only one out there brave enough to
> tell the truth...
> With WalMart selling birth control pills for $5.00
> a month, why is it the apparently intelligent
> Georgetown Law student can't figure out a way to
> afford her birth control, jeez DC gives condoms
> away.



http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203370604577263281305035966.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop

Filthy Slut Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> To just assume a vast majority of
> women agree with Ms Fluke shows how ignorant you
> are.

To just assume a vast majority of women disagree with Ms Fluke shows how ignorant you are.

> believe it or not most women can pay for
> their own birth control and it isn't a huge
> consuming issue for them.

Not true. It's about access. It's about women's health. I'm not particularly surprised that cannot even to grasp what the issue is.

> People like you make me sick to my stomach.

Right back at ya, friend.

> It exposes the neanderthal thinking on the left not
> the right.

Hardly.

Daddy's Little Girl Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> > believe it or not most women can pay for
> > their own birth control and it isn't a huge
> > consuming issue for them.
>
> Not true. It's about access. It's about women's
> health. I'm not particularly surprised that
> cannot even to grasp what the issue is.

Theres 9 dollars a month. Even if you go by the 3 thousand over the course of school shes at a school that costs over 60k a year. "...total costs come out to be around $63,750 per year for full time students and $58,280 per year for part time students."

So she can pay over 180k for school but not 3 grand for bc, yea that makes sense.

And its not about access, she has access. Its about getting it for free and forcing her beliefs on the university. Im assuming she failed her constitutional law class or she just doesnt care about the constitution when it serves her needs not too. She knew going in they did not cover these and has stated her goal was to change that. You are falling for it hook line and sinker

To anyone whose argument contains the word slut or whore: you have zero credibility.

Glad that Sarah chick isn't my daughter..I'd beat her ass the moment she walks in the door for whoring around and putting it out in TVland!!!

If she can afford law school, she can afford a box of $5 condoms or walk her lazy slut ass to Planned Parenthood.

She is a disgrace to all women...geesh, begging for birth control...slut

I hate Rush Limbo, but that chick has bad teeth and a mustache.

BEH Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I hate Rush Limbo, but that chick has bad teeth
> and a mustache.


And a fat ass. They showed her last night on NBC news before she sat down. Pickup trucks were on both sides of her with "Wide Load Ahead" signs.

If that stache isn't photoshopped, it is scary. No way this chick gets any bone from conscious males.

Dirty Whore Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> What right is it of congress to mandate coverage?
> That's already a major cause of escalating
> premiums. Look at New York where sex change
> operation coverage is mandated by the state.
>
> If she can afford to be a career student at GT @
> 40,000 k tuition per year she shouldn't be worried
> about birth control costs. Remember she said it
> was a financial burden.
>
> Otherwise if she is borrowing money from us which
> we have no guarantee of getting back, she needs to
> keep her legs crossed and graduate after 12
> fucking years.
>
> Rush is right. She is a slut


Sandra Fluke, Gender Reassignment, and Health Insurance
Sandra Fluke is being sold by the left as something she's not. Namely a random co-ed from Georgetown law who found herself mixed up in the latest front of the culture war who was simply looking to make sure needy women had access to birth control. That, of course, is not the case.

As many have already uncovered Sandra Fluke she is, in reality, a 30 year old long time liberal activist who enrolled at Georgetown with the express purpose of fighting for the school to pay for students' birth control. She has been pushing for mandated coverage of contraceptives at Georgetown for at least three years according to the Washington Post.

However, as I discovered today, birth control is not all that Ms. Fluke believes private health insurance must cover. She also, apparently, believes that it is discrimination deserving of legal action if "gender reassignment" surgeries are not covered by employer provided health insurance. She makes these views clear in an article she co-edited with Karen Hu in the Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law.

The title of the article, which can be purchased in full here, is Employment Discrimination Against LGBTQ Persons and was published in the Journal's 2011 Annual Review. I have posted a transcript of the section I will be quoting from here. In a subsection of the article entitled "Employment Discrimination in Provision of Employment Benefits" starting on page 635 of the review Sandra Fluke and her co-editor describe two forms of discrimination in benefits they believe LGBTQ individuals face in the work place:

"Discrimination typically takes two forms: first, direct discrimination limiting access to benefits specifically needed by LGBTQ persons, and secondly, the unavailability of family-related benefits to LGBTQ families."

Their "prime example" of the first form of discrimination? Not covering sex change operations:

"A prime example of direct discrimination is denying insurance coverage for medical needs of transgender persons physically transitioning to the other gender."

This so called "prime example" of discrimination is expounded on in a subsection titled "Gender Reassignment Medical Services" starting on page 636:

"Transgender persons wishing to undergo the gender reassignment process frequently face heterosexist employer health insurance policies that label the surgery as cosmetic or medically unnecessary and therefore uncovered."

To be clear, the argument here is that employers are engaging in discrimination against their employees who want them to pay for their sex changes because their "heterosexist" health insurance policies don't believe sex changes are medically necessary.

Additionally Sandra Fluke and her co-editor have an answer for why exactly these "heterosexist" insurance policies, and the courts that side with them, deem sex changes as medically unnecessary:

"In Mario v. P & C Food Markets, Inc., an employee who was denied such coverage brought claims under the federal Employee Retirement Income Security (ERISA) and Title VII. The court rejected the ERISA claim, finding the plaintiff's mastectomy and hormone therapy were not medically necessary. The court's ruling was based upon controversy within the medical community regarding that treatment plan. Much of that controversy has been linked to ignorance and bias against transgender persons, and the American Medical Association has declared the lack of coverage to be discrimination."

You see, all opposition to the determination that sex changes are medically necessary, and therefor must be covered by private employer provided health insurance, is based on "ignorance and bias against transgender persons".

The section on discrimination against those seeking gender reassignment ends with Sandra Fluke and her co-editor wondering why more lawsuits aren't filed against private employers on these grounds. Especially in comparison to the frequency with which these types of cases are filed against Medicare, Medicaid, and even the prison system:

"The reason for this lack of cases is unclear. Private employee insurance plans do not more frequently cover this need, so it may be a sign that transgender employees do not see the courts as likely to provide any assistance against private employers."

The argument made in this article edited by Sandra Fluke and Karen Hu is quite clear. "Gender reassignment" is a medically necessary set of procedures that must be covered under employee provided health insurance policies. If it is not covered by those policies that is tantamount to discrimination and legal action should be taken against the employer.

So, as you can see, Sandra Fluke is not what she is being sold as. Instead she is a liberal activist pushing some rather radical ideas. Keep that in mind as the left holds her up in the spotlight.

http://mrctv.org/blog/sandra-fluke-gender-reassignment-and-health-insurance

Slow news day for republicans? Republicans just keep getting whacker every day.

So dirty whore was right, she's a lezbo? That would explain the mustache and butch haircut. Just wondering.

Genevieve Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> To anyone whose argument contains the word slut or
> whore: you have zero credibility.


Shut up you slut whore!

Dirty Whore Was Right Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> http://mrctv.org/blog/sandra-fluke-gender-reassign
> ment-and-health-insurance

What part of that screed makes it okay for Lush Dimbulb to call Sandra Fluke a slut and/or a prostitute? What part of that screed makes it okay for Lush Dimbulb to demand that she produce pornography for his enjoyment?

Genevieve Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> To anyone whose argument contains the word slut or
> whore: you have zero credibility.

+1

LossForVirginians Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Genevieve Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > To anyone whose argument contains the word slut
> or
> > whore: you have zero credibility.
>
> +1


-1. Now we're even.

Inquiring_Minds Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dirty Whore Was Right Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> http://mrctv.org/blog/sandra-fluke-gender-reassign
>
> > ment-and-health-insurance
>
> What part of that screed makes it okay for Lush
> Dimbulb to call Sandra Fluke a slut and/or a
> prostitute? What part of that screed makes it
> okay for Lush Dimbulb to demand that she produce
> pornography for his enjoyment?


Pay not attention to my imposter. I am going to go watch Bill Maher and then applaud him as he calls women cunts,

Apparently Limbaugh has lost 10 advertisers and continues to lose them, despite his half-hearted apology. I hope this is the beginning of the end to that drug-addicted racist.

Edit: Can anyone say "free fall?"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/06/rush-limbaugh-advertisers-leave-show-fluke_n_1323358.html

The best part is Limbaugh is now attacking his former advertisers. He's done.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/06/2012 11:04AM by WashingTone-Locian.

Rush has also been dropped by five radio stations.

Rush ManBearPig Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rush has also been dropped by five radio stations.


Makes you wonder if this isn't an excuse people have needed for dropping him. Radio in general is in bad shape these days. Limbaugh may not be as profitable a proposition for stations as he once was. And advertisers have had plenty of opportunities in the past to drop him, but they are really going for broke on this one.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

The fifteen minutes are up. Drop this thread.

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rush ManBearPig Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Rush has also been dropped by five radio
> stations.
>
>
> Makes you wonder if this isn't an excuse people
> have needed for dropping him. Radio in general is
> in bad shape these days. Limbaugh may not be as
> profitable a proposition for stations as he once
> was. And advertisers have had plenty of
> opportunities in the past to drop him, but they
> are really going for broke on this one.

I remember Donnie G saying it cost $50 a month for station to carry a syndacated radio program. Maybe Rush has a hgher premium and if it is he can always lower it.

As long as local stations can make profit from selling ads during that time slot there is little incentive for them to drop his program.

Limbaugh's show is syndicated for free. Local stations give him a chunk of minutes every hour to broadcast his national ads.

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Limbaugh's show is syndicated for free. Local
> stations give him a chunk of minutes every hour to
> broadcast his national ads.


That might have been the case in the early years, but it doesn't appear to be the case now...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rush_Limbaugh_Show#Radio_syndication


...I'm sure Clear Channel is recouping that cost through its stations somehow.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> TheMeeper Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Limbaugh's show is syndicated for free. Local
> > stations give him a chunk of minutes every hour
> to
> > broadcast his national ads.
>
>
> That might have been the case in the early years,
> but it doesn't appear to be the case now...
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rush_Limbaugh_Sho
> w#Radio_syndication
>
>
> ...I'm sure Clear Channel is recouping that cost
> through its stations somehow.


Hes got the number 1 radio show in the nation with 15+ million listeners. Theyre turning a nice profit off of him.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most-listened-to_radio_programs

Some advertisers may bail right now, others will step right in. Itll all blow over very soon, hes not going anywhere

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Apparently Limbaugh has lost 10 advertisers and
> continues to lose them, despite his half-hearted
> apology. I hope this is the beginning of the end
> to that drug-addicted racist.
>
> Edit: Can anyone say "free fall?"
>
> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/06/rush-limb
> augh-advertisers-leave-show-fluke_n_1323358.html
>
> The best part is Limbaugh is now attacking his
> former advertisers. He's done.


Want to bet? The same thing happened when Limbaugh said he hoped Jughead failed. 2 weeks later, show over. Limbaugh has up to 20 million listeners and is his own boss. Even if he does a Howard Stern and moves to XMSirus, he'd still make tens of millions of $$$ a year. Talk show hosts are now starting to call for boycotting liberal mouthpieces like NBC as well as the advertisers on them and dropping HBO. 40% of US is conservative. 20% Liberal. Should be interesting.

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> That might have been the case in the early years,
> but it doesn't appear to be the case now...

Unless something's recently changed, Im pretty sure it's still given away for free, at least in smaller markets. It's come up on Stern a few times. It's how Rush was able to be so widespread in places like Grand Junction, CO or San Angelo, TX. He'd get most of the ad time, and the station got a few free hours of programming they didn't have spend money trying to fill. Maybe they charge now but I can't imagine all those tiny markets are paying very much.

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > That might have been the case in the early
> years,
> > but it doesn't appear to be the case now...
>
> Unless something's recently changed, Im pretty
> sure it's still given away for free, at least in
> smaller markets. It's come up on Stern a few
> times. It's how Rush was able to be so widespread
> in places like Grand Junction, CO or San Angelo,
> TX. He'd get most of the ad time, and the station
> got a few free hours of programming they didn't
> have spend money trying to fill. Maybe they
> charge now but I can't imagine all those tiny
> markets are paying very much.

I would be willing to bet money that Rush isnt paying to be on small town airwaves like that. The free programming is probably a good draw for them, and my guess would be that there is a certain allotted amount of time they get to run a couple local ads during his shows breaks. Plus the added benefit of people finding out about the station to tune into Rush could lead to better ratings for their other shows. But I do agree in the rural towns like that the ability to not have to worry about what to do for a few hours of programming a day and getting it free is probably a huge draw.

Inquiring Minds Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Pay not attention to my imposter. I am going to
> go watch Bill Maher and then applaud him as he
> calls women cunts,

Don't flatter yourself, toad.

Show me a clip of Bill Maher calling women 'cunts'. Oh, that's right: You cannot because no such clip exists.

<((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))>

Inquiring_Minds Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't flatter yourself, toad.
>
> Show me a clip of Bill Maher calling women
> 'cunts'. Oh, that's right: You cannot because no
> such clip exists.

You mean like when he called Sarah Palin a cunt and refused to apologize. He also called her a dumb twat, and her and other republican women bimbos. The list goes on, but I guess the feminists dont care about respecting women unless they have the same political ideology

I would just like to thank Rush for turning women voters away from the republican party in droves.

no she doesnt Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------
>
> I would be willing to bet money that Rush isnt
> paying to be on small town airwaves like that.

I didn't mean Rush was paying to be on the air. Just that there was no fee for syndication. Stations trade a big chunk of their ad-time so Rush could promote his national sponsors.

I'm not criticizing Limbaugh here either, it seems like a good business model to reach his audience. It used to make Stern nuts when Rush would brag about "Im on 250 stations!", when really his show was being given away, while Stern was charging a $1M+ syndication fee.

Maybe that's changed, but it's come up on Stern within the past 2-3 yrs, and I can't imagine Rush could charge very much in all those backwater markets.

His statements about this media whore won't drive away any real republican women.

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> no she doesnt Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> ----
> >
> > I would be willing to bet money that Rush isnt
> > paying to be on small town airwaves like that.
>
> I didn't mean Rush was paying to be on the air.
> Just that there was no fee for syndication.
> Stations trade a big chunk of their ad-time so
> Rush could promote his national sponsors.
>
> I'm not criticizing Limbaugh here either, it seems
> like a good business model to reach his audience.
> It used to make Stern nuts when Rush would brag
> about "Im on 250 stations!", when really his show
> was being given away, while Stern was charging a
> $1M+ syndication fee.
>
> Maybe that's changed, but it's come up on Stern
> within the past 2-3 yrs, and I can't imagine Rush
> could charge very much in all those backwater
> markets.


I agree completely with that. I actually think its a great business model for radio. You can charge large metro areas but a lot of smaller places either cant afford to pay or wont pay fees for the program especially large fees. Anything he losses in fees he can make up for with greater advertising fees as his ratings grow. I too would be surprised if he changed what made him so successful.

I would go as far to say that more national radio should follow that lead. Especially with the economy how it is give the small towns that cant afford it ect a break and let them run the programs for free. In the long run with a win win for both sides if you have a good show.

lol, just look at some of the markets he's in. I guess I'm not surprised that I guessed Grand Junction and San Angelo correctly.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/stations

I can guarantee some little AM station in the middle-of-friggin-nowhere Honesdale, PA isn't forking out very much to keep Rush on the airwaves.

no she doesnt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You mean like when he called Sarah Palin a cunt
> and refused to apologize.

Where's the clip, dipshit?

> He also called her a dumb twat

No, he did not. Don't bother posting some 2nd or 3rd-hand account. Show evidence or GTFO.

> and her and other republican women
> bimbos.

"Bimbo" = a woman who is physically attractive but is perceived to have a low intelligence or poor education.

"Slut" = a woman who is considered to have loose sexual morals or who is sexually promiscuous.

Palin IS a bimbo.

<((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))>

no she doesnt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > TheMeeper Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Limbaugh's show is syndicated for free.
> Local
> > > stations give him a chunk of minutes every
> hour
> > to
> > > broadcast his national ads.
> >
> >
> > That might have been the case in the early
> years,
> > but it doesn't appear to be the case now...
> >
> >
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rush_Limbaugh_Sho
>
> > w#Radio_syndication
> >
> >
> > ...I'm sure Clear Channel is recouping that
> cost
> > through its stations somehow.
>
>
> Hes got the number 1 radio show in the nation with
> 15+ million listeners. Theyre turning a nice
> profit off of him.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most-listened
> -to_radio_programs
>
> Some advertisers may bail right now, others will
> step right in. Itll all blow over very soon, hes
> not going anywhere

Exactly right. Rush single handily saved AM radio in the late 80's and to this day maintains the most listen to talk show on air.

Fact is conservative women in America detest the radicalized feminist type of activist Fluck represents which are the only women Rush alienates.

Liberal women tend to be angry, unhappy and ugly skanks with no real men in their lives. At least none they respect. That is why this Fluck bitch is beaming over her new found fame. She is happier now then at anytime in her loser career. She will be forgotten soon enough and fade into oblivion.

That is a hell of a price to pay just to get on Oprah.

Inquiring_Minds Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Inquiring Minds Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Pay not attention to my imposter. I am going
> to
> > go watch Bill Maher and then applaud him as he
> > calls women cunts,
>
> Don't flatter yourself, toad.
>
> Show me a clip of Bill Maher calling women
> 'cunts'. Oh, that's right: You cannot because no
> such clip exists.


My bad, he called her a twat. It was great! I loved it!




Now that I have proven my point, provided you the evidence, will you please stop impersonating my name, you dumb twat!

Inquiring Minds Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> My bad, he called her a twat.

Twat = A pejorative meaning a fool, a stronger alternative to the word twit.

To call a woman a "Twat" is not nearly as offensive as a "cunt" or a "slut". Don't believe me? Ask a woman, if you know any.

So, to summarize, Bill Maher has never said anything about any woman that is even close to as offensive as what was uttered by Lush Dimbulb last week.

Thanks for proving my point!

<((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))>

Inquiring_Minds Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Inquiring Minds Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > My bad, he called her a twat.
>
> Twat = A pejorative meaning a fool, a stronger
> alternative to the word twit.

That is one definition. You know the other, but would prefer to ignore it so you can continue to castigate the dumbass Limbaugh while still lick at the nuts of Maher.

> To call a woman a "Twat" is not nearly as
> offensive as a "cunt" or a "slut". Don't believe
> me? Ask a woman, if you know any.

I just did. She said it was equally offensive. I even informed her of the alternative definition you suggested that Mr. Maher was using. She didn't buy it. She is a pretty smart lady. Unlike you, she can form her own opinion and doesn't need it spoonfed to her. Mr. Maher, though, is still a comic and political gemius and I applaud his use of it. I alos applaud his use of the word cunt!

Look at you, on the other hand, you can't even think up your own username.

> So, to summarize, Bill Maher has never said
> anything about any woman that is even close to as
> offensive as what was uttered by Lush Dimbulb last
> week.

Sure he has. He has used the word cunt. It has been reported in numerous outlets. But, you are too dim to believe something that has been factually reported by multiple sources. Instead, you need video evidence. What are you? 13?

http://www.dallasvoice.com/maher-your-beautiful-theater-gonna-long-1070487.html

While imitation is the sincerist form of flattery, I am going to have to ask you to stop using a variation of my username. See, you aren't the only dimwitted dipshit on this board and they might get confused. No matter how hard you try, your simpleton's drivel can't compete with my witty intelligence.

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> lol, just look at some of the markets he's in. I
> guess I'm not surprised that I guessed Grand
> Junction and San Angelo correctly.
>
> http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/stations
>
> I can guarantee some little AM station in the
> middle-of-friggin-nowhere Honesdale, PA isn't
> forking out very much to keep Rush on the
> airwaves.


Lol not a chance a good amount of those markets could fork out money for the show even if they desperately wanted too.

Inquiring_Minds Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Where's the clip, dipshit?
> No, he did not. Don't bother posting some 2nd or
> 3rd-hand account. Show evidence or GTFO.

> > and her and other republican women
> > bimbos.
>
> "Bimbo" = a woman who is physically attractive but
> is perceived to have a low intelligence or poor
> education.
>
> "Slut" = a woman who is considered to have loose
> sexual morals or who is sexually promiscuous.
>
> Palin IS a bimbo.


Im not wasting any time on someone who is too stupid to use a search engine and find things themselves and will just believe what ever they want to anyway. Youll probably just enjoy it anyway being the partisan hack you are weseal.

Inquiring Minds Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> you can continue to castigate the dumbass Limbaugh

Indeed, it is pleasurable.

> She is a pretty smart lady.

She has chosen to lie to you, so I'd agree.

> Look at you, on the other hand, you can't even
> think up your own username.

I really enjoy how much that chaps your ass!

> He has used the word cunt. It has
> been reported in numerous outlets. But, you are
> too dim to believe something that has been
> factually reported by multiple sources.

No, that would make me a conservative. There's no video, you say, of Bill Maher calling Sarah Palin a 'cunt'? Then it didn't happen.

> While imitation is the sincerist form of flattery,
> I am going to have to ask you to stop using a
> variation of my username.

Again with the user name. I may never use another.

<((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))>

sumguy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> His statements about this media whore won't drive
> away any real republican women.

Exactly.

The liberal cunts and head-in-the-sand "moderates" that are actually offended by this fiasco weren't going to listen to Rush anyway.

Its like if vegetarians threatened a boycott of Burger King...why should anyone give a rats ass?

Inquiring_Minds Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Inquiring Minds Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > you can continue to castigate the dumbass
> Limbaugh
>
> Indeed, it is pleasurable.

Wow, you need to get out more.

> > She is a pretty smart lady.
>
> She has chosen to lie to you, so I'd agree.

She actually laughed at your stupidity, that is how I know she is telling the truth.

> > Look at you, on the other hand, you can't even
> > think up your own username.
>
> I really enjoy how much that chaps your ass!

Chaps my ass? That sounds pretty gay. In reality, you know whose ass it chaps. You know why I continue to bring it up. You know that this is the username you want and you hate the fact that you don't have it.

> > He has used the word cunt. It has
> > been reported in numerous outlets. But, you
> are
> > too dim to believe something that has been
> > factually reported by multiple sources.
>
> No, that would make me a conservative.

Yet, it has been reported by multiple sources and you contradict yourself with the following sentence. Sucks to be a dumbass like you, doesn't it?

> There's no
> video, you say, of Bill Maher calling Sarah Palin
> a 'cunt'? Then it didn't happen.

See your own contradictory statement above. Obama is not the father of Malia. How do I know? There is no video showing it. I think I might be less intelligent after writing those sentences. Holy shit, is that how you feel after writing a sentence like that?

For instance, did you actually feel brain cells dying when you typed: "There's no video, you say, of Bill Maher calling Sarah Palin a 'cunt'? Then it didn't happen."

There is now way you think that sounded intelligent. The stink of stupidity is strong on you, isn't it?

> Again with the user name. I may never use
> another.

We know that's not true. There are more than a few of yours I enjoy using from time to time.

The fact that you took the time to register one so similar to the one you lost tells me how attached you were to this particular one. It makes me smile knowing how pissed you are that you have to use a cheap imitation.

I wish we could have that WNC lawyer come to this thread with a cease and desist order. I am already bored with it. Most of America has already moved on to other things. Face it the average attention span of people these days is about thirty minutes then on to something else.

Remember Casey Anthony, OJ, Rick Perry or Whitney Houston? I didnt think so.

I wish the woman involved would shampoo her hair more often. It looks dingy and oily. I am sure Suave is cheaper than a box of condoms.
Attachments:

gay hair dresser Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I wish the woman involved would shampoo her hair
> more often. It looks dingy and oily. I am sure
> Suave is cheaper than a box of condoms.


Any suggestions for her stache? Wax or bleach?

COME JOIN THE FUN

Feminist up in arms on this posting vs a bunch of dudes (presumably).

http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/45/220621.page#2225193

Speaking of dykes with mustaches, I want to go to GeorgeTown Law School. Why should I have to pay tuition? I want it free. Let my mortgage company pay for it. That way, it doesn't cost anyone anything. Why, the liberals are geniuses.

Rush is an idiot. He should just take an extra Oxy and chill out.

36 advertisers are gone. Wonder what Rush thinks of the "free market" now?

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2012/03/rush-limbaugh-sandra-fluke-advertisers-peter-gabriel/1#.T1eJysxpGPo

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Rush Limbaugh Sponsor Exodus Hits 40 as Sandra Fluke Fallout Continues

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/rush-limbaugh-sponsor-exodus-sandra-fluke-station-loss-297057

It would seem that words have consequences.

<((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))>

The problem is he gets paid by Clear Channel. It's really Clear Channel taking the hit, here, since they are obligated to pay Limbaugh regardless of how much advertising revenue is coming in.

Interestingly enough, and nobody in the media is really talking about this yet, but Bain owns Clear Channel. So there is another shoe that will drop on this.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ...Bain owns Clear Channel. So there is another shoe that will drop
> on this.

Yeah, I looked into it and saw that and said to self "Ooooooeeee!"

It's going to be fun soon.

Oh please, Rush is going to be fine. The only thing that matters is ratings and he's got them. If anything this whole fiasco may actually increase his ratings and popularity among conservatives.

He'll still be making 8 figures a year long after this skank's 15 minutes of fame are up and the media's manufactured outrage subsides.

no she doesn’t Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Oh please, Rush is going to be fine. The only
> thing that matters is ratings and he's got them.
> If anything this whole fiasco may actually
> increase his ratings and popularity among
> conservatives.
>
> He'll still be making 8 figures a year long after
> this skank's 15 minutes of fame are up and the
> media's manufactured outrage subsides.

Who gives a shit about Lush Dimbulb? This is about tarring the entire conservative movement as a bunch of Dimbulb clones: Hateful, misogynistic troglodytes. It’s working like a charm, so far. We always have our eyes on the prize, baby! Total Democratic Party control of government in 2012!

<((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))>

Inquiring_Minds Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This is
> about tarring the entire conservative movement as
> a bunch of Dimbulb clones: Hateful, misogynistic
> troglodytes. It’s working like a charm, so far.

Its only working with people who have their heads firmly up their own asses.

In other words: likely Democrat voters

I'd say its a push.

I always go straight to Sarah Palin for advice...

Palin2012 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I always go straight to Sarah Palin for advice...
>
>


It's funny how after nearly four years of attention whoring and cashing in Palin is now getting snippy about the press wanting to talk to her. What a self-serving piece of shit.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Push... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Inquiring_Minds Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > This is about tarring the entire conservative movement
> > as a bunch of Dimbulb clones: Hateful, misogynistic
> > troglodytes. It’s working like a charm, so far.
>
> Its only working with people who have their heads
> firmly up their own asses.
>
> In other words: likely Democrat voters
>
> I'd say its a push.

Say what you will, but watch the polls. The entire Imploding Party of No is so afraid of crossing Dimbulb that none will stand up to condemn his attacks on Sandra Fluke. Between these spineless apparatchiks and Dimbulbs heavily qualified half-apology to Ms. Fluke, believe me, women are watching and thinking about the right wing's war against them and their rights. Future polls will show an acceleration of women across the political spectrum moving away from you hateful, misogynistic troglodytes (AKA, Republicans).

<((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))>

If it's a "push," it's pushing the GOP off the cliff with women. As much as the Republican spin-doctors want to say the GOP nominating process has been good for the party, it hasn't. The GOP has managed to alienate suburban soccer moms big-time. I would have to think that only the most die-hard Republican women are not aggravated by the whole birth control debate and Limbaugh calling that gal a "slut."

And as for the "Liberal Media" not taking people to task, I seem to recall both Bill Maher and Don Imus being fired by "the liberal media" for making equally stupid statements in their careers. When is Limbaugh getting fired?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Carbonite already crawling back as it stock tumbled 20% after they announced they were pulling out. Limbaugh told them to go to hell. He's got 5 new sponsors lined up to come aboard over the next 10 days. Another super fail from the left. When are these dumbfucks going to realize there's just not enough of them to sustain any kind of boycott or protest. 19% and falling. By the time our kids are grown, liberals will be like the Amish. Weird smelly backward buggy-riders with long scraggly beards and fat ugly wives. Libtards, the end is near.

Xena Xantec Xaholic Xobbyist Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Carbonite already crawling back as it stock
> tumbled 20% after they announced they were pulling
> out. Limbaugh told them to go to hell. He's got
> 5 new sponsors lined up to come aboard over the
> next 10 days. Another super fail from the left.

HAHAHAHAHAHA! That’s REALLY funny!

Too bad for you that it isn’t true.

The truth is, Carbonite's stock has been losing value for months, but today it's up 4%.

I guess lies are all you toads have left. LoLz!

<((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))>
Attachments:

Sorry folks, pay no attention to Inquiring_Minds or WashingTone_Locian.

They're just bitter because they pee sitting down, like all liberal "men".

Sandra Fluke on the other hand pees standing up.

Inquiring_Minds Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Xena Xantec Xaholic Xobbyist Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Carbonite already crawling back as it stock
> > tumbled 20% after they announced they were
> pulling
> > out. Limbaugh told them to go to hell. He's
> got
> > 5 new sponsors lined up to come aboard over the
> > next 10 days. Another super fail from the
> left.
>
> HAHAHAHAHAHA! That’s REALLY funny!
>
> Too bad for you that it isn’t true.
>
> The truth is, Carbonite's stock has been losing
> value for months, but today it's up 4%.
>
> I guess lies are all you toads have left. LoLz!


I like how you left out the fact that last week it was in the mid 9s, then Obama had the economic speech yesterday sending the dow down over 200 points and today it as a small bounce back. You are as clueless with stocks as you are with politics.

The bottom line is Rush is going to be fine. This isnt going to change anything. Any sponsor that leaves will be replaced by a new one.

I do like the level of intelligence you consistently show with all your name calling as well. Very persuasive as always.

As far as WTLs Bain capital theory, Romney doesnt work there anymore completely irrelevant and even if he did it wouldnt matter. Hes already said he doesnt agree with the statements as have many prominent GOP members who condoned the slut remark. They dont control Rush anyway and Rush is free to say what he wants to say. Anyone who is really up in arms and a Fluke defender anyway almost certainly wasnt a Rush listener in the first place.

no she doesnt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> [Willard]'s already said he doesnt agree with the
> [Dimbulb's] statements

Typically, in the most milquetoast manner possible. Willard needed to stand up to Dimbulb like a man, but he could not. Women noticed, as have many men.

> many prominent GOP members who condoned the slut
> remark.

Yes, sadly this is true.

> They dont control Rush anyway and Rush is
> free to say what he wants to say.

Yes, however as the face of the Imploding Party of No, Dimbulb speaks for you all.

> Anyone who is really up in arms and a
> Fluke defender anyway almost certainly
> wasnt a Rush listener in the first place.

True, but they are voters. They can have a much greater impact than turning off the radio.

<((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))>



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/07/2012 04:56PM by Inquiring_Minds.

Inquiring_Minds Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Typically, in the most milquetoast manner
> possible. Willard needed to stand up to Dimbulb
> like a man, but he could not. Women noticed, as
> have many men.

If by many men you mean yourself than yes you are right. He didnt need to do a single thing, he responded when asked about it. Its not an issue. You just desperately want it to be because youre weseal and you hate anything GOP and dont deal in reality.

> > many prominent GOP members who condoned the
> slut
> > remark.
>
> Yes, sadly this is true.

No thats not true, that was a typo on my part. They condemned the remark. But shows how dishonest you are that you think its true.

> Yes, however as the face of the Imploding Party of
> No, Dimbulb speaks for you all.

No one with any amount of intelligence would call him Dimbulb. Its not funny, its not cute, its not even remotely creative. It really is the dumbest attempt of an insult Ive seen to date. All it does is show you either 12 years old, or of very limited intelligence. Maybe its both.

> > Anyone who is really up in arms and a
> > Fluke defender anyway almost certainly
> > wasnt a Rush listener in the first place.
>
> True, but they are voters. They can have a much
> greater impact than turning off the radio.

How stupid do you have to be to believe that Rush listeners now just turned into Obama voters because of that comment 7 months out from the general? You cant honestly believe the crap that you type? If you really do believe what you say I truly feel sorry for you. For your sake and the sake of your family I hope you know what you say is garbage and are just doing it in a desperate attempt to influence people to your side.

no she doesnt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> [Willard] didnt need to do a single thing, he
> responded when asked about it. Its not an issue.

Of course his limp response is an issue. You’ll see come November.

> No one with any amount of intelligence would call
> him Dimbulb. Its not funny, its not cute, its not
> even remotely creative.

Thanks, your opinion proves to me that it’s really all three of those!

> How stupid do you have to be to believe that Rush
> listeners now just turned into Obama voters
> because of that comment 7 months out from the
> general?

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit. I agreed with you that Fluke supporters are likely not Dimbulb listeners, but noted that they are voters, which is much more important. Really, do try to keep up.

<((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))>

Inquiring_Minds Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> no she doesnt Wrote:

> Of course his limp response is an issue. You’ll
> see come November.

None of this will have any baring in November. Even WTL will tell you Limbaughs comments and Romneys response will not matter.

> > No one with any amount of intelligence would
> call
> > him Dimbulb. Its not funny, its not cute, its
> not
> > even remotely creative.
>
> Thanks, your opinion proves to me that it’s
> really all three of those!

So you are in fact 12 and or unintelligent.

> > How stupid do you have to be to believe that
> Rush
> > listeners now just turned into Obama voters
> > because of that comment 7 months out from the
> > general?
>
> Reading comprehension is not your strong suit. I
> agreed with you that Fluke supporters are likely
> not Dimbulb listeners, but noted that they are
> voters, which is much more important. Really, do
> try to keep up.

Logic obviously isnt yours. No one is changing their vote because of what he said 1 time in late feb/early march. His listeners arent changing their vote, and anyone who thinks Fluke is a hero was already voting for Obama. Its meaningless, absolutely meaningless to the November. vote. The issue will be dead by June if not sooner and absolutely dead by November.

If you think that Romneys response to Limbaugh or the comments themself will hang around for 7 months in a presidential election this is obviously the first election youve ever paid attention too or pretended to pay attention too since you are clueless about most things.

no she doesnt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No one is changing their vote because of what
> he said 1 time in late feb/early march.

You’re nearly as out-of-touch as Willard.

> anyone who thinks Fluke is a hero
> was already voting for Obama.

She’s not a hero, she’s a VICTIM. A defenseless lamb viciously attacked, and no one in the Imploding Party of No will stand up to defend her. If you don’t think that this has already cost the GOP thousands, perhaps millions, of votes, you’re simply not paying attention.

> If you think that Romneys response to Limbaugh or
> the comments themself will hang around for 7
> months in a presidential election this is
> obviously the first election youve ever paid
> attention too or pretended to pay attention too
> since you are clueless about most things.

It’s just part of the ever growing narrative that the Imploding Party of No is anti-woman, anti minority, anti-immigrant, and, ultimately, anti-American.

The Obama/Willard decision in November will make the 1964 Johnson/Goldwater decision look like a squeaker.

<((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))>



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/07/2012 05:58PM by Inquiring_Minds.

David Axelrod: If Romney Can't Condemn Limbaugh, 'How Can He Stand Up To Ahmadinejad?'

Top Obama re-election adviser David Axelrod took a page from the neocon playbook on Wednesday, arguing that Mitt Romney's unwillingness to call out Rush Limbaugh for making incendiary remarks raised questions about whether he would be able to face the world's worst dictators if elected president.

<((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))><((((<>))))>

After showing how truely idiotic you really are im not going to dignify the bs you just posted with a response. The koolaid is too strong in you. I am now convinced you are either mentally ill or in fact in middle school.

If anyone would like to continue this topic that is an adult feel free to comment. Otherwise its time to just let this thread die if all its going to be is weseals insanely idiotic responses.

Axelrod is baiting Romney. This is going to end up being a discussion of Bain and Limbaugh.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Axelrod is baiting Romney. This is going to end up
> being a discussion of Bain and Limbaugh.


Theyll try too, he may not bite though. Or he may just bite get it over and done with and come November it wont matter. Axelrod should have saved this in his pocket for the general

Inquiring_Minds Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Xena Xantec Xaholic Xobbyist Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Carbonite already crawling back as it stock
> > tumbled 20% after they announced they were
> pulling
> > out. Limbaugh told them to go to hell. He's
> got
> > 5 new sponsors lined up to come aboard over the
> > next 10 days. Another super fail from the
> left.
>
> HAHAHAHAHAHA! That’s REALLY funny!
>
> Too bad for you that it isn’t true.
>
> The truth is, Carbonite's stock has been losing
> value for months, but today it's up 4%.
>
> I guess lies are all you toads have left. LoLz!



Read what was written you illiterate imbecile. It didn't say "Carbonite was a mighty stock before hand. It said that Carbonite came crawling back and that it lost 20% after it announced that it was pulling out as an advertiser of Limbaugh. Your lame ass post does nothing to refute that. Loser!

I would bet that most of the companies that pulled out of Limbaugh's show will end up losing money. The liberal scum didn't buy from them anyway. All they did is get 10,000 maggot infested useful idiots to send emails saying they were boycotting and that was enough. Anyone will pull advertising if they get 10K form emails from a group threatening them.

The left loses again. As it should be. Limbaugh will be on AM radio and 600 stations long after that jugheaded dunce in the WH is back hating Whitey in Shitcago.