Anyone have any suggestions for passing a sobriety test if you get pulled over? I had a close call the other night...

Don't drink and drive. Good enough suggestion for you?

yeah don't drink and then drive home is that good enough for ya you stupid moron son of a whore? Or take a cab home with your peanut sized brain you dick smoking pussy blocker

Blow the cop and not the white tube.....

Or run.

Perform a different test every time you drink, after enough drinking you'll be golden

how about before you drive home hang yourself in the bar bathroom so we have one less moron like you in the world

Ummm yeah Don't DRINK and Drive or do DRUGS and Drive......

" It's all Fun and Games till Someone gets Hurt "



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/04/2011 04:15PM by FunAndGames.

The OP just HAS to be a troll. Has to.

The OP just HAS to be a troll.

Best advice is 1. Don't drink and drive, and 2. Don't do something to get pulled over for if you do, followed by 3. For God's sake don't be falling over stupid drunk if you fail to do 1 and 2.

Throw up on the cop and then hand him over a stool sample right there on the spot. BECAUSE YOU ARE A STUPID PIECE OF SHIT FOR GETTING BEHIND THE WHEEL IN THE FIRST PLACE FOOL.. YOU DESERVE TO HIT A FUCKING TELEPHONE POLE HEAD ON ASSHOLE

Pacman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Anyone have any suggestions for passing a sobriety
> test if you get pulled over? I had a close call
> the other night...

I hear eating your underwear will mask the smell of alcohol.

If that doesn't help and you're forced to take a sobriety test, be sure to ask the officer to repeat himself at least twice every time he asks a question or gives an instruction. If the conversation doesn't go something like this, you're going to fail it...

Officer: Please count backwards from 97 to 83.
You: Do what now?
Officer: Please count backwards from 97 to 83.
You: Count backwards from what?
Officer: 97.
You: To what again?
Officer: 83.
You: And you want me to count?
...
...
...

That's a sure fire way to successfully pass any field sobriety test; by the time the test is complete you'll be stone sober!

Enjoy your new found evasion tactics. I expect to see you swerving around lanes and wrapping your car around trees in no time!

Make sure you understand each test completely before starting. Do not admit any guilt.

Delay the test for as long as you can. It may save you a .01 point that could make the difference between .07 legal and .08 drunk.

Have your Cellphone camera ready to video the the cop giving it to you. Guarantee he will make a mistake.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

dika-dika Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Have your Cellphone camera ready to video the the
> cop giving it to you. Guarantee he will make a
> mistake.

State of Virginia requires a two party consensus when being audio recorded or video taped without an individual's knowledge. That is why in Virginia when you enter a place of business signs must be visible and clearly state that it is under video surveillance. By entering such places you are giving permission to allow yourself to be monitored on cctv. Maryland doesn't have such laws therefore conversations and incidents may be audio recorded or video taped secretly by individuals not affiliated with law enforcement.

the_law Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> State of Virginia requires a two party consensus
> when being audio recorded or video taped without
> an individual's knowledge. That is why in
> Virginia when you enter a place of business signs
> must be visible and clearly state that it is under
> video surveillance. By entering such places you
> are giving permission to allow yourself to be
> monitored on cctv. Maryland doesn't have such
> laws therefore conversations and incidents may be
> audio recorded or video taped secretly by
> individuals not affiliated with law enforcement.

Off topic, but you got it precisely backwards. Maryland is a 2-party state, Virginia only requires one.

http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=13492



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/05/2011 06:47PM by Ut videam.

put a penny under your tongue before you blow into the machine....

youll pass every time.

Don't be a douche by drinking and driving. Fucking idiots.

die in a fiery crash. Then you can't take the sobriety test.

Ut videam Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> the_law Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > State of Virginia requires a two party
> consensus
> > when being audio recorded or video taped
> without
> > an individual's knowledge. That is why in
> > Virginia when you enter a place of business
> signs
> > must be visible and clearly state that it is
> under
> > video surveillance. By entering such places
> you
> > are giving permission to allow yourself to be
> > monitored on cctv. Maryland doesn't have such
> > laws therefore conversations and incidents may
> be
> > audio recorded or video taped secretly by
> > individuals not affiliated with law
> enforcement.
>
> Off topic, but you got it precisely backwards.
> Maryland is a 2-party state, Virginia only
> requires one.
>
> http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=13492

Exactly what I was going to say. Now, that doesn't necessarily matter when you are dealing with cops. Plenty will act like you are breaking the law by recording them. They may even arrest you and confiscate your tape. Plenty of lawsuits about this across the country.


Call a cab idiot. Your night will be much more fun without worrying about getting a DWI. Find a chick to drive you home. Something other than your 1st choice.

Otis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Make sure you understand each test completely
> before starting. Do not admit any guilt.
>
> Delay the test for as long as you can. It may
> save you a .01 point that could make the
> difference between .07 legal and .08 drunk.


Unless your BAC is on its way up! I'm talking about the "one for the road"

1. Don't drink and drive.

B. If you disregard the above and get stopped, don't take ANY tests. I'd be compliant and polite to avoid an ass beating but don't answer questions, don't breathe on the officer, avoid standing and walking. If he arrests you based on some type of probable cause he will have not those tests to use against you. If you get arrested, you're going to get another charge of unreasonable refusal but I'd take that chance.

Ut videam Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> the_law Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > State of Virginia requires a two party
> consensus
> > when being audio recorded or video taped
> without
> > an individual's knowledge. That is why in
> > Virginia when you enter a place of business
> signs
> > must be visible and clearly state that it is
> under
> > video surveillance. By entering such places
> you
> > are giving permission to allow yourself to be
> > monitored on cctv. Maryland doesn't have such
> > laws therefore conversations and incidents may
> be
> > audio recorded or video taped secretly by
> > individuals not affiliated with law
> enforcement.
>
> Off topic, but you got it precisely backwards.
> Maryland is a 2-party state, Virginia only
> requires one.
>
> http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=13492


No, I actually had it right. Read section B2 http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+19.2-62

You're either trying to get our goats or you're just stupid as hell. Every single person on this earth knows that you're not to drink and then drive. You obviously know that you're going to continue drinking and driving, being that you asked for suggestions on how to pass the test. Soooooo, you DESERVE to get caught and I hope you do before you injure or kill innocent people!!

Pacman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Anyone have any suggestions for passing a sobriety
> test if you get pulled over? I had a close call
> the other night...

Close call? Brah, everyone knows if a cops behind ya, you just gotta go faster than him. If you put some distance between the two of you he won't be able to see you swerve.

dika-dika Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Have your Cellphone camera ready to video the the
> cop giving it to you. Guarantee he will make a
> mistake.


Yes a common practice, thats why ASAP classes are always full

the_law Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No, I actually had it right. Read section B2
> http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+co
> d+19.2-62

Wrong.

2. It shall not be a criminal offense under this chapter for a person to intercept a wire, electronic or oral communication, where such person is a party to the communication or one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to such interception.

One party, moron. You said Virginia's a two-party state. It's clearly one, and you clearly fail at reading comprehension.

Do not take the sobriety test if you're drunk. not the field test or the breathalyzer

You will go to jail (you're gonna go there if you fail)

You will get off later because there was never probable cause to give you the tests in the first place

Trust me

Otis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Make sure you understand each test completely
> before starting. Do not admit any guilt.
>
> Delay the test for as long as you can. It may
> save you a .01 point that could make the
> difference between .07 legal and .08 drunk.

never mind



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/07/2011 08:22AM by Priapus.

Ut videam Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> the_law Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > State of Virginia requires a two party
> consensus
> > when being audio recorded or video taped
> without
> > an individual's knowledge. That is why in
> > Virginia when you enter a place of business
> signs
> > must be visible and clearly state that it is
> under
> > video surveillance. By entering such places
> you
> > are giving permission to allow yourself to be
> > monitored on cctv. Maryland doesn't have such
> > laws therefore conversations and incidents may
> be
> > audio recorded or video taped secretly by
> > individuals not affiliated with law
> enforcement.
>
> Off topic, but you got it precisely backwards.
> Maryland is a 2-party state, Virginia only
> requires one.
>
> http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=13492

You know, I read that individuals post and said to the Mrs. "Hey Martha, an unregistered user is spreading mis-information on fairfaxunderground!"

She said "George, that just can not be! The internet was designed for the exchange of useful information, not mis-information."

I replied "I know Martha. The backbone of the irregular mesh may not be able to handle what it was not designed for - mis-information. One or two people spreading mis-information is one thing. But 5 or 6 people on the whole internet spreading mis-information? This sucker will crash and burn!"

Martha then said "You are probably correct, George. Mis-information is a very bad thing. Why do you suppose the unregistered user on FXU spread mis-information?"

I said "I just don't know Martha. I just don't know"

"Oh Martha, in addition, the mis-information spreader called VA a state. We are a commonwealth, not state"

"Get away from the computer" She said. "That internet will be coming down any time now"

Fairfaxunderground rules: Lilliputions, not ok. Midgettville ok. I got it now.

Ut videam Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> the_law Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > No, I actually had it right. Read section B2
> >
> http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+co
>
> > d+19.2-62
>
> Wrong.
>
> 2. It shall not be a criminal offense under this
> chapter for a person to intercept a wire,
> electronic or oral communication, where such
> person is a party to the communication or one of
> the parties to the communication has given prior
> consent to such interception.
>
> One party, moron. You said Virginia's a two-party
> state. It's clearly one, and you clearly fail at
> reading comprehension.


Slight mis-information.

Key word is "intercept". You videoing a traffic stop is no "interception".

There is what the Supreme Court calls the expected right of privacy. You can not video tape someone peeking over a fence, or with a long lens through a window.

But once you, or the cop, step outside. There is no expected right of privacy so video and take all the pictures you want.

Please stop the mis-information. it is damaging the internet.

Fairfaxunderground rules: Lilliputions, not ok. Midgettville ok. I got it now.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/07/2011 08:57AM by Radiophile.

don't take it Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Do not take the sobriety test if you're drunk. not
> the field test or the breathalyzer
>
> You will go to jail (you're gonna go there if you
> fail)

You are correct up to this point.

>
> You will get off later because there was never
> probable cause to give you the tests in the first
> place
>
The officer merely needs probable cause (defined as- a reasonable amount of suspicion, supported by circumstances sufficiently strong to justify a prudent and cautious person's belief that certain facts are probably true) to make an arrest and drag your sorry ass to jail.

This PC is easy to obtain based upon driving behavior witnessed by the officer, the odor of alcohol coming from you body when he talks to you, slurred speech etc.

In order to CONVICT in court the state must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (basically that the proposition being presented by the prosecution must be proven to the extent that there could be no "reasonable doubt" in the mind of a "reasonable person" that the defendant is guilty.)

So, by refusing ALL tests and everything as I talked about before, you make it VERY difficult, not impossible, for the state to prove a DWI case. Consider that may cruisers have cameras and are recording audio. It's very hard to impeach (meaning show that it's inconsistent) that sort of testimony.

Bottom line, please don't drink and drive, it's dangerous.

Always video tape any encounters with police.

abe lincoln sez Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> put a penny under your tongue before you blow into
> the machine....
>
> youll pass every time.


Mythbusters de-bunked this along with many other "solutions."

Radiophile Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Slight mis-information.
>
> Key word is "intercept". You videoing a traffic
> stop is no "interception".

Wrong. According to the definition of "intercept" in Virginia law, videotaping a traffic stop, conversation, or any other interaction constitutes "intercepting" it.

§ 19.2-61. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

"Intercept" means any aural or other means of acquisition of the contents of any wire, electronic or oral communication through the use of any electronic, mechanical or other device;

http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+19.2-61

> Please stop the mis-information. it is damaging
> the internet.

Please heed your own advice.

Virginia law always the videotaping of any incident in public. Interception is for taping phone conversations not video taping or recording in a public place.

VideoTap Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Virginia law always the videotaping of any
> incident in public. Interception is for taping
> phone conversations not video taping or recording
> in a public place.

Citation please.

Ut videam Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Radiophile Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Slight mis-information.
> >
> > Key word is "intercept". You videoing a traffic
> > stop is no "interception".
>
> Wrong. According to the definition of "intercept"
> in Virginia law, videotaping a traffic stop,
> conversation, or any other interaction constitutes
> "intercepting" it.
>
> § 19.2-61. Definitions.
>
> As used in this chapter:
>
> "Intercept" means any aural or other means of
> acquisition of the contents of any wire,
> electronic or oral communication through the use
> of any electronic, mechanical or other device;
>
> http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+co
> d+19.2-61
>
> > Please stop the mis-information. it is damaging
> > the internet.
>
> Please heed your own advice.


Read and comprehend "aural or other means of acquisition". This is NOT whipping out your own camera and taking a video. by taking your own video, you are not "acquisitioning" anything.

As long as your not interfering in the police investigation, you are allowed to take pictures videos etc of nearly anything outside.
So videoing a policeman at a traffic stop is ok. Videotaping a policeman when he stopped you, probably not ok.

Mis-information on fxu. How shocking!

Fairfaxunderground rules: Lilliputions, not ok. Midgettville ok. I got it now.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 08/07/2011 02:20PM by Radiophile.

Ut videam Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> VideoTap Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------

>
> Citation please.

Google "reasonable expectation of privacy" and photography. You will see many cases.

"It's not that recording any conversation is illegal without consent. It's that recording a private conversation is illegal without consent," "So then the question is, 'Are the words of a police officer spoken on duty, in uniform, in public a 'private conversation.' And every court that has ever considered that question has said that they are not."

Fairfaxunderground rules: Lilliputions, not ok. Midgettville ok. I got it now.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/07/2011 02:41PM by Radiophile.

Ut videam Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Radiophile Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Slight mis-information.
> >
> > Key word is "intercept". You videoing a traffic
> > stop is no "interception".
>
> Wrong. According to the definition of "intercept"
> in Virginia law, videotaping a traffic stop,
> conversation, or any other interaction constitutes
> "intercepting" it.
>
> § 19.2-61. Definitions.
>
> As used in this chapter:
>
> "Intercept" means any aural or other means of
> acquisition of the contents of any wire,
> electronic or oral communication through the use
> of any electronic, mechanical or other device;
>
> http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+co
> d+19.2-61
>
> > Please stop the mis-information. it is damaging
> > the internet.
>
> Please heed your own advice.

You sir, are a complete moron. Read what is actually wriiten. The code goes on to say

electronic, mechanical, or other device” means any device or apparatus which can be used to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication other than—
(a) any telephone or telegraph instrument, equipment or facility, or any component thereof,
(i) furnished to the subscriber or user by a provider of wire or electronic communication service in the ordinary course of its business and being used by the subscriber or user in the ordinary course of its business or furnished by such subscriber or user for connection to the facilities of such service and used in the ordinary course of its business; or

(ii) being used by a provider of wire or electronic communication service in the ordinary course of its business, or by an investigative or law enforcement officer in the ordinary course of his duties;

(b) a hearing aid or similar device being used to correct subnormal hearing to not better than normal;

Fairfaxunderground rules: Lilliputions, not ok. Midgettville ok. I got it now.

Do not drink and drive!!!!!

All this video and recording shit is funny --- lets try reality, ok?

Officer asks you out of your vehicle - you get out and start to record with your phone - the officer asks you to put the phone down and place hands on head / take sobriety test etc... If you do not put the phone down, you can add the additional charges of resisting (or the like), so videotaping is OUT, whether legal or not.

As for not taking the test, that equates to admission of guilt and / or a simple blood test will be done at the station - both prove your DWI. Add to that, by not taking the test, the officer will be more likely to pile on any charges that are available.

A really simple fact is that you can not "beat" the test, but only delay when the police record your BAC.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/07/2011 11:23PM by postpoppunk.

You couldn't be more wrong ^^^^^^^^^^ . I hate when people spread totally false info.


Again,

Don't take any sobriety tests if you get pulled over. You'll get out of it later.

Refuse any and all tests.

Don't give them any more evidence.

So silly Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You couldn't be more wrong ^^^^^^^^^^ . I hate
> when people spread totally false info.
>
>
> Again,
>
> Don't take any sobriety tests if you get pulled
> over. You'll get out of it later.
>
> Refuse any and all tests.
>
> Don't give them any more evidence.


You are a fucking idiot...when you go to the station, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE!!! They will, and do, strap you in the chair to get a blood sample. It is not a choice, or something you can refuse...they will physically, and within their rights, force you into the chair. If you struggle, they will use force to STRAP you in the chair --- then take a blood sample.

You CAN refuse the breath test, but CAN NOT refuse the blood test...PERIOD.

This is a FACT - there is no discussion here, or any false information. I will not entertain your ignorance any further...ask a police officer if you do not believe me - they will tell you exactly what I have stated.

don't drink and drive

you also automatically lose your license for 6 months if you refuse to take the tests

postpoppunk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> You are a fucking idiot...when you go to the
> station, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE!!! They will,
> and do, strap you in the chair to get a blood
> sample. It is not a choice, or something you can
> refuse...they will physically, and within their
> rights, force you into the chair. If you struggle,
> they will use force to STRAP you in the chair ---
> then take a blood sample.
>
> You CAN refuse the breath test, but CAN NOT refuse
> the blood test...PERIOD.


NOT IN VIRGINIA. In Virginia you may refuse all tests and have an automatic 1 year suspension. You can not be made to give blood in Virginia, in others states that is true.

However, even with out the tests an officer can still charge you with DUI. It just makes it easier for a lawyer to get you off.

If you refuse to submit to a chemical test in Virginia the officer must inform you of the penalties for test refusal and ask you a second time if you will submit to a chemical test. A first offense refusal will result in your license being revoked for 1-year. You will also not be eligible for a restricted license if you refuse a chemical test.

Any second or third offense test refusal will result in your license being revoked for 3-years and you will not be eligible for a restricted license during the revocation period.