Virginian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Since Confederate generals literally are traitors,
> it seems somewhat wrong that they would be so
> officially honored, Lee Hisself included.
>
> But stranger things have happened, I guess.
>
> Here's an interesting article on just this subject
> at West Point:
>
http://www.philipstown.info/ptwp/?p=3123
>
> I couldn't find anything equivalent for Annapolis,
> though the first superintendant of the academy
> actually joined the confederacy! His portrait must
> be SOMEWHERE there, huh?
Considered traitor, why are so many US Army posts today named after Confedrate Generals, one for example FT Hood Tx (John Bell Hood). Why wasn't any confederate general tried for treason? Why wasn't Jefferson Davis tried for treason? So what are your literal facts to support your assertion that" Confederate generals literally are traitors". Sure Virginian...transplant from somewhere else.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------