Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Boston Massacre v. January 6th, the murder of Ashley Babbit
Posted by:
Uncle Sam 101v
()
Date: May 04, 2026 02:09PM
.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
Uncle Sam 101v
Date: November 14, 2023 10:34PM
__________________________________
Ashley didn't break the window. She only tried to spring through it like a kitten.
TWO NIGGERS BROKE THE WINDOW, ONE WAS SEEN ON VIDEO DROPPIGN SOMETHING THAT LOOKED LIKE A WEAPON.
THE VIDEO SHOWED THAT AS ASHLEY APPROACHED THERE WAS A LOUD VOICE
NO WARNING SHOT
other protestors were in the area
ashley was set up by niggers - every bit of the video shows niggers were hunting whites like deer
not just that - that the real reason for it all was BLM, the black whitehouse, corrupt DC taking control of federal agencies with German SS Germany Maryland protecting the capitol with german and nigger asian troops
TO PREVENT A RECOUNT BY LAW OF LEGALLY ACCEPTABLE VOTES
TO FINGER OUT THOSE APPOINTED WHO WON NO ELECTION PROCESS PROPERLY
===============================
Boston masacre
drop dead democrats
you will not do that for free in America, there will be repercussions
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3ghn54
Date: November 14, 2023 10:35PM
__________________________________
little red riding hood
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
wikipedia, the devil of BIG TECH
Date: November 14, 2023 10:48PM
__________________________________
UPLOADED BY DAILYMAIL.UK
THAT IS A FUKCING LIE
Google Images shows only EU GERMAN CHINA lie drawnings that aren't perdiod and aren't usa history.
"it was called a Massacre BECAUSE civilians were shot at by police state goons"
it helped decide George Washington and other's minds that "they were going to remove the british by killing them"
the brittish lords were just "entering cities with troops", saying they were quartered for the colonies when really they were in that colony only for the spcific purpose of bullying the single colony to pay tax to the lord that brought the troops, and to protect that lord from reprisals
BOSTON WAS NOT FOUNDED BY THE BRITISH. it was founded by people who FLED EU, the petty feudal war dictatorships that it was, to make a New World without police state. and they put it into their new laws
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3g5rhb534
Date: November 14, 2023 10:50PM
__________________________________
it was called a Massacre because they shot at un-armed civilians who "threw some snowballs" and were in general complaining about the troops being there to TAXE the living hell out of their colony while threatening anyone who didn't pay
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
gf3hb453
Date: November 14, 2023 10:52PM
__________________________________
there was no "row of blue suits with weapons"
DROP DEAD DEMOCRATS
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
w3g3rh4
Date: November 14, 2023 10:56PM
__________________________________
MARYLAND NIGGERS USING USA GRANTS
HISTORY CHANNEL (PART OF BET, BLACK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK)
"The Boston Massacre was a deadly riot that occurred on March 5, 1770, on King Street in Boston. It began as a street brawl between American colonists and a lone British soldier, but quickly escalated to a chaotic, bloody slaughter. The conflict energized anti-British sentiment and paved the way for the American Revolution. "
the fact: THAT'S A FUCKING LIE
THERE WERE MANY BRITISH SOLIDERS WITH MUSKETS THAT TAKE A LONG TIME TO RELOAD
5 civilians WERE SHOT "instantaneously" and no chance to reload
IT WAS NOT A RIOT
throwing snowballs doesn't amount to a riot
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DROP DEAD NIGGERS
USING MY TAX MONEY TO STAIN MY HISTORY DOESN'T SIT WELL WITH ME
https://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/boston-massacre
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3g3h54
Date: November 14, 2023 10:57PM
__________________________________
THERE WAS NO BRITISH SOLIDER KILLED
NOR WAS THERE ANY JAN 6 OFFICERS KILLED
THE VIDEO OF THE BOY IN THE DOOR WAS A FAKE
AND THE LATER DEATH OF A MAN WASN'T CONFIRMED TO HAVE EVEN BEEN AT THE TRUMP RALLY
AND THE BURNING OF THE CHURCH BY NIGGERS: WAS CONFIRMED WITH PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
fg3whg43
Date: November 14, 2023 11:01PM
__________________________________
March 5, 1770,
DAILYMAIL.UK, BBC, TELEMUNDO, CHINA
TRIED TO SPREAD THE RUMOR THAT THE COLONISTS ATTACKED
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
HOWEVER, THE TESTIMONY OF THE CROWD WAS THAT THE BRITISH WERE SPREADING LIES
THAT ACTUALLY - IT HAD BEGUN WITH SOME IDIOT THROWING A SNOWBALL(S)
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
TG3HG43
Date: November 14, 2023 11:25PM
__________________________________
Wikipedia - the devil
"NINE British soldiers shot several of a crowd of three or four hundred who were harassing them"
THAT ALSO WAS NOT TRUE
if it were, those soldiers would have been dead meat, since they couldn't reload a musket quickly at all
it was a small crowd, and just several civilians who were along that particular street
"Triumph of the American Nation", Lewis Paul Todd, Merie Curi, HARCOURT PUBLISHERS (HBJ)
p. 113
The Boson Massacre
On March 5, 1770, a large crowd gathered in Boson around soliders of th 29th British Reigment*. The crowd yelled insults and threw snowballs. Such outbursts had occurred many times before. This time matters got out of hand. As the mob pressed closer against the soldiers, someone gave an order to fire. Three civilians were killend and two other mortally wounded.
One of those killed was Crispus Attucks, a former slave who'd escaped 20 years earlier from his master, and was one of the first to die (in all) of the coming struggle of the Colonies against Great Britain.
As news of the shooting spread, the peple of Boston went wild with anger. A "massacre" they called the affair. They also demanded the British withdraw all troops from their city.
Later, when passions had cooled somewhat, the British solders were tried for muder**. They were defended by Josiah Quincy Jr and John Adams, who later bacame the 2nd President of the United States. Neither of these men had any sympathy for the British, but they insisted that every person was entitled to a fair trial. All except two of the soldiers were aquitted. These two were convicted of manslaughter but were release soon after****
___________________________________________
* NOTE ALREADY ONE LIE EXPOSED, about there being only 1 soldier who was bullied. bullying was why those soliders were in the town
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
hg4tjn45
Date: November 14, 2023 11:33PM
__________________________________
"there was only a single soldier protecting all the Lord's gold and was being beaten up by protestors" A BRITISH LIE
"there was a young officer killed by protestors who crushed him maliciously" IS A BBC LIE, the boy wasn't even the person later claimed dead at the DC NIGGER hospital
take NEWS from the people who did a massacre: obviously all lies
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
b3rbn3
Date: November 14, 2023 11:40PM
__________________________________
BRANDING ON THE THUMB
with a blacksmiths cattle brand. to mark permanently and painfully this person's deeds so that they could not be hidden later.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
g3bh4
Date: November 15, 2023 12:07AM
__________________________________
i forgot: the last history book was copyright 1950 however a 1982 edition. allot of race cards in the book i feel added well after 1950. permissions to copy go to 1936 and then to 1650 - so it's even older, the sources. also - a proffessor edited it, not merely a teacher hack upload.
a much later history book, edited by clintonite, shows lies beginning to develope. it says "colonists generally didn't believe the soldiers were at fault". THAT'S A LIE. THE BOSTON MASSACRE was big news spread across the colonies. And most news (except in bully dictatorship colonies) read "it was a MASSACRE of 5 civilians", going on to explain how it occurred by testimony of the same boston people who were in the crowd. all who would convict the soldiers no doubt given the choice.
"THE AMERICAN PAST, A Survey of American History", Joseph R. Conlin, 3RD ed, 1990, 1984 Harcourt HBJ (NOTE - SAME PUBLISHER as the previous same year practically). all past copyright are denied and a long list of teachers are given instead.
The Boston Massacre
On March 5, 1770, the day the Townshend Duties were repealed, the weather in Boston was frigid. The streets were icy, and heaps of gritty snow blocked the cobbled gutters. No doubt aggravated by the severity of the winter, which brought unemployment as well as discomfort, some men and boys exchanged words with British soldiers who were patrolling the streets. From a handful of hecklers there grew a crowd, many cursing and throwing snowballs at the redcoats. A few dared them to use their muskets.
(me - note how this is is all edited to make it appear as the colonists were guilty and asked to be shot. IT'S A LIE. and this book has TONS more race cards than the other: it's been hacked by democrats)
When the mob pressed to close on King Street, acking th esoliders against a wall, they fired. Five in the crowd, including a boy and a black seaman named Crispus Attucks, fell dead. Boston, scarcely more than a town at 15,000 population, was shocked. A few men who had been active in the Stamp Act crisis tried to revive anti-British feelings. Silversmith Paul Revere (THE BRITISH ARE COMING! THE BRITISH ARE COMING! a man true to his word and deeds) prepared (some say plagiarized) an engraving that depcted soldiers aggressively attacking innocent people. Samuel Adams, a former brewer, circulated pritns of the picture of the "Boston Massacre". Joseph Warren, a physician, passionaltely embroidered on the theme. "Take heed, ye orphan babes," he told the public meeting, "lest, whilst your streaming eyes are fixed upon the ghastly corpse, your feel slide on the stones be spattered with your father's brains.
But the agitation failed to bear fruit (it as published to all colonies, california-china 1990's says it failed. that's A LIE). Most people blamed the incident on the mob. (not true - it helped convince the people to join the Revolution). John Adams**, cousin of Samuel and friend of Warren, agreed to represent the accused soldiers in court. He was nobody's stooge, least of all of the British. John Adams was strong headed to the point of self-righteousness and a strident critic of British policies****. IN arguing the redcoats' case, Adams roundly criticized the practice of stationing professional soldiers in cities like Boston*****.
"Soldiers quartered in a populous town will always occasion two mobs where they preent one," he said. "They are wretched conservators of the peace." Nevertheless, Adams argued that British policy and an unsavory mob, not the indicated redcoats (soliders), bore the blame for the tragedy of March 5. The jury agreed, acquitting all the defendants save two and sentencing them only to branding on the thumb, a slap on the wrist by eighteenth-century standards."
_____________________________
** note this idiot book admits adams called it a massacre then says Adams believed it was the colonists fault. THE BOOK IS FULL OF CROSS TESTIMONY LIES, uk lies)
**** they are tryin to say if Adams fought for innocence then all the news the BRITISH tried to spread was true, "there was only 1 young soldier protecting all the lord's gold and being beaten", total lies. Adams however sent out a death penalty for many british by not just partaking but in the construction of the American Revolution.
***** it was their only good defense, that the lord had put them there as bullies to collect taxes and as such, were only there by themselves being bullied into the "job"
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
yj5m65
Date: November 15, 2023 12:12AM
__________________________________
this last book made several attempts to blame the colonists and exhonerate the british
BUT ADAMS DID NOT. he only suggested leniency.
AS A MATTER OF DIPLOMACY from a man who would be arranging, in secrecy, a plan of Revolutionary War? It would be best not to rile Great Britain's ire in the matter.
It would be best to be lenient here, so not to be fingered as a Revolution participant before the main event.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
history theory
Adams gave a fair argument
However his purpose to be light handed was political - to ease immediate backlash from the British. So that the British would not send extra troops to "liberate the 5 and further bother the colonists of Boston".
that'd be what i'd do as Adams, if i were so smart as he
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3g3hb45
Date: November 15, 2023 12:13AM
__________________________________
they were there to bully the people for inflation
they did a massacre to stay in control
STOP THE STEAL
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
34g34hg
Date: November 15, 2023 12:23AM
__________________________________
these GOOGLE Image hits are TOTAL LIES. and they are from asian servers, eu ukraine servers etc.
STUDY.COM, a clinton obama biden REGIME, says i must "sign in using legitimate school password" to read what they are teaching kids
it says in headline that "Boston civilians were rioting", AND IMMEDIATELY THAT IS A LIE. it began with words and a snowball: not a riot in general at all. a riot of one is not a riot.
IT SAYS COLONISTS THREW STONES - that's a lie, no other history source shows proof of that nor any proof of soldier injury. all went to trial WITHOUT a hospital visit infact.
(if a boston man throws a rock at you, you are going down, you might not live to tell about it)
NO EVIDENCE ANY STONE WERE THROW WAS HAD. THE COLONISTS DENIED IT.
infact, history i heard was "they claimed the snow was ice, and so might harm them", never heard the "rocks" at all!
WHERE: WHAT SOURCE WHAT BOOK!! OBAMA YOU FUCKING NIGGER LIAR.
https://study.com/learn/lesson/boston-massacre-causes-facts.html.html
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3wg3h4
Date: November 15, 2023 12:29AM
__________________________________
THERE'S A POINT ADAMS MISSED and all the historians are failing on.
The colonists wanted the british soldiers to leave. They knew the heavy taxes and awful "policies being enforced" were only possible by having weapons pointed at them.
The RALLY of persons, (no farming today, too snowy), WERE TELLING THE BRITISH TO LEAVE THE STREET, GO HOME, BACK OFF, LEAVE THE COUNTRY.
The soldiers staunchly stood their ground but it was STOLEN GROUND. And that's what does make it the soldiers fault moreso their Lord's fault. They knew it was time to leave they VOLUNTEERED to stay and bully Boston. That makes it a crime of their own.
However Adams was right: it was certainly not the time to rile the British at this time. Doing so might make things allot more difficult for the Revolution.
(some idiot book above said they were un-employed. that's so stupid it's incredible. winter colonies did not "spur manufacturing during the winter", that's not the story of colonies OMG!!!)
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3tg3h43
Date: November 15, 2023 12:38AM
__________________________________
However Adams may not have been a genius.
He probably spoke with the Lord, the lord wanting to protect his men, probably told Adams the political facts were that murder convictions would lead to British reprisals not to Boston's advantage.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
304984
Date: November 15, 2023 12:58AM
__________________________________
GOOGLE HAS actually blocked all images for "throwing stones" from old testament, repacing them with new artwork of people carrying heavy stones and using them as hammers (obviously that's not THROWING)
GOOGLE has also blocked "THROWING THE FIRST STONE", no image has stone throwing at all.
1700's people were fit, tough farmer laborer types - not today's protester trash
THROWING STONES WAS USED TO KILL THE DAMNED
** if the colonists had been doing that, they greatly outnumbered the troops - they would have exterminated the troops quickly. the well minded colonists stood back. THEN PROSECUTED THE SOLIDERS. LATER - they made the british leave. later.
infact the 5 most responsible were ready to stand trial immediately but the trial was delayed to allow the town to settle down - not to allow the "soldiers to heal to stand trial"
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
ewgf3hg4
Date: November 15, 2023 01:00AM
__________________________________
Jackie Chan once killed half a Dojo with the throwing of one stone. True story.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
4tf3ghg43
Date: November 15, 2023 01:21AM
__________________________________
That's right, they were busy keep warm, getting water, vising the town store house (rotting grain?! bleh, best served with beer) for food.
the colonies did have have tradesman. but in the winter you aren't "traveling to the next state on your horse" unless you must. too much chance of freezing to death.
their trades were to use their own land (was free not bought probably), do their trade (with wood iron or stone probably), and sell this in town (to a store house which resold it probably)
THERE WEREN'T EMPLOYEMENT CENTERS. THERE WEREN'T WINTER MANUFACTURING CHANGE-OVERS. The british lord taxed in the winter: but didn't "hire in the winter" unless so his fat ass didn't have to fetch fire wood himself.
in 1770's a girl with that height probably would have been deemed an amazon woman and sent to another town in fear she "might cause trouble"
hur hur, found this piece of wood out back!
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3gh5
Date: November 15, 2023 01:22AM
__________________________________
When SHE brings in the wood, it's alreay burning!
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
rgh4eh54
Date: November 15, 2023 01:23AM
__________________________________
and for that reason: probably a witch!
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3wg35rh4
Date: November 15, 2023 01:28AM
__________________________________
"THE AMERICAN PAST, A Survey of American History", Joseph R. Conlin, 3RD ed, 1990, 1984 Harcourt HBJ",
"... which brought unemployment as well as discomfort ..."
I SURJECT THAT WAS NOT THE CASE, that the colonies did not have "everyone in formal employment else starving in the winter"
THAT IS A BRITISH KING / BOSSES RULERSHIP. That's not how the Colonies worked at all inside.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
gf3hb34
Date: November 15, 2023 02:08AM
__________________________________
probably not from 1770's, but you get the point
BONTON EMPLOYMENT 1770's
* STAYING WARM. many trips to wood pile. hearth tending. clothing refits and misfits and drying ice off them clothes. strip em off. WAS AN EMPLOYMENT.
* the store house of grain was not infinite. they likely hunted, trapped, fished to supplant their non-growing winter crop which was: nothing. nothign grew.
FISHING
, deer, ...
SUPPLIES WILL ARRIVE IN THE SPRING - little wait on outsource foods from the south. actually the south didn't have a supply train to feed northern colonies in winter. never happened in colonial america like that. perhaps a few arranged rescues occurred. travel was dangerous. freeze to death, no gas stations or police if you get stuck on the road; dead. wooden wheels in winter? doubtful bets.
* bumbing off those large British ships. (can't be sure but i assume some of that they tried)
*
and more fishing
*
DON'T LEAN BACK IN THAT CHAIR!!
NAILS WON'T BE ARRIVIN' UNTIL THE SPRING, and i ain't gonna sit on the floor all winter
*
after you read that a week, it's going in the fire or used like Brawny
* CONTRARY TO POPULAR PHOTOS, YOUR WINTER SHIP IS NOT COMING IN ...
in Boston 1770 winter - probably few ships and 1/2 were taking not bringing. the citizens were not "fed up" for no reason.
Frozen Boston Harbor
Posted on February 15, 2015 by BHB
February 2015 will likely go down in history for its snow and ice. The rivers that empty into the southern side of the harbor have become particularly backed up ice, that has extended far into the harbor, and has been … Continue reading
From the 1400s people became "braver" and more inclined to voyage in the winter (in part because of new ships types), but 1569 Venice decided to reintroduce a ban on sailing between 15.11- 20.1 due to the number of shipwrecks.
"Friends, let not though neighbor suffer and freeze."
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3g45hj5
Date: November 15, 2023 02:11AM
__________________________________
wikipedia (my guess)
"the british kept the colonies fed in the winter" (lies)
THE TRUTH
without modern diesel engines and a steel hull: boston is a real problem for ships potentially
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3g35h
Date: November 15, 2023 02:20AM
__________________________________
that's 1856 artwork
while there may have been sleigh in 1770's Boston - i'm unsure they had things so well down
you know, you carried firewood to your own house - not across town - unless you had horses and business supplyign someone else
1770's boston had blacksmiths. some had sleighs we can guess.
your picture of 1770's massacre was denizens out on foot. not horsed or cruizing around on sleds.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
w3rgh35h
Date: November 15, 2023 02:24AM
__________________________________
how they kept horses alive in the winter, i'm unsure
but the above fellows are doing a good job of trying to kill one, probably
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3hgh5
Date: November 15, 2023 02:30AM
__________________________________
Plymouth Colony was right next door to BOSTON
the Massachusetts Bay Colony
Plymouth played a central role in King Philip's War (1675–1678), one of several Indian Wars, but the colony was ultimately merged with the Massachusetts Bay Colony and other territories in 1691 to form the Province of Massachusetts Bay.
THAT'S A LIE. PLYMOUTH WAS SUPPLIED BY PRIVATE ENTERPRISE THAT CAME UP SHORT. NOT BY THE KING.
THEY RAN FROM EUROPE AND THE KING AND EUROPE.
WIKIPEDIA HAS EDITED ALL ARTICLES TO SAY UK had supplied the world richly in History, the savior of many. it's simply not true. infact they ran pirate ships so did the spanish.
INDIANS WERE IN PLYMOUTH, and they attacked the Colony. colonists defended themselves. british came along after, the skunks they are, and began "charging taxes" by virtue "their military was well armed and over here"
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3G35H53
Date: November 15, 2023 02:39AM
__________________________________
i didn't think of that, that certain beasts not native to boston might be usable for burden in the snow
but i would guess certainly not "allow of people"
* MILKING COWS. cows could eat grass in winter probably give some milk. just a guess.
* killing chicken for soup, which weren't surviving the winter well anyway ...
*
MORE Clinton Obama lies: "what school was like in the Colonies"
fact is: they didn't necessarily have it
kids back then WORKED. some never went to school.
it wasn't until the INDUSTRIAL AGE that it became law kids must attend so as not to be abused in factories
fact is: the colonies, many, didn't have separate purpose built school houses built.
What School Was Like in the 13 Colonies
History Channel
Sep 6, 2022 — A child's education was anything but “standardized” during America's colonial era, which spanned most of the 17th and 18th centuries.
The American Colonial Period (1600-1776): Most...
Sutori
The American Colonial Period (1600-1776): Most education took place in the home. If the parents were able they taught their kids basic reading and ...
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
34g45h
Date: November 15, 2023 02:41AM
__________________________________
"what school was like in colonial america"
REALLY OBAMA? just like that huh?
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3gh54
Date: November 15, 2023 02:42AM
__________________________________
https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
that pro democrat "lying about the past" was from black entertainment channel public fund operated
THE HISTORY CHANNEL
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3g3h54
Date: November 15, 2023 02:43AM
__________________________________
you might have an old woman in a church teaching some kids - and it may have been called "bible lessons" not "school", that'd all depend on the town
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3b4b5
Date: November 15, 2023 02:45AM
__________________________________
the place of teaching ... probably her home or the church
probably doing it in exchange for clothing at the town or to keep up favors to keep the town appeased it ... kinda fell on her to do
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
23gh435h4
Date: November 15, 2023 02:47AM
__________________________________
* BURYING PEOPLE
unfortunately, another fact of early colonies was a more random life expectancy and keeping somewhat of a cold shoulder to death, since it was only to be expected
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
rghb54r
Date: November 15, 2023 02:48AM
__________________________________
if bible reading was done, perhaps penning one's essays to stretch out time on winter nights
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3wg3hg45
Date: November 15, 2023 03:06AM
__________________________________
To "be employed" in the winter of 1770's ...
my not so subtle point
you had to have ALL your bases coveed at home
* probably fire going / not out (likey requires a wife and kids)
* warm clothing dried read
* not far from town or have horse
* supplies
it's not like you'd go in town in your car and bring home groceries from the grocery store and your thermostat kept the house warm
IT TOOK PERHAPS ALL THE TIME YOU HAD - just making sure you were safe, and helping your neighbor, during the winter
some could go to the city no doubt for some limited time in the winter. but it was the few who could.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3h4h5
Date: November 15, 2023 03:27AM
__________________________________
CABIN FEVER
not some joke. people died from carbon monoxide from the fires they kept to stay warm.
staying indoors allot, and poisoning: led to CABIN FEVER.
(PROBABLY why some were angry at the british - some in the the town were no doubt cranky in the winter somewhat)
try and get your firewood with cabin fever when your week from poor winter supplies. not as easy as it sounds.
Benjamin Franklin
worked on a "better fireplace" which among things TRIED TO PREVENT gas poisoning deaths for the colonies. he wasn't the only - many tried it and mostly only that did had them. they generally didn't get sold and installed as they hoped. the only thing that did was the classic style iron wood burning stove. which no doubt was not in ample supply 1770's
"The first wood-burning stove was patented in Strasbourg GERMANY in 1557"
HUGE LIES. chinese way way before. and germans weren't the first in europe either.
THE NEXT NAZZI LIE WAS GOOGLED: THAT GERMANY PRIVIDED STOVES TO USA IN 1700'S 1800'S AND ONWARD
THE TRUTH IS A DAMN COLD PLACE IN USA HAD BLACKSMITH WHO, GUESS WHAT, MADE STOVES THAT WERE POPULAR IN USA
http://stovehistory.blogspot.com/2015/08/vermont-stove-inventors-inventions-and.html
Vermont Stove Inventors, Inventions, and their Makers, 1817-1850 {TBA}
This map shows (a) with a black diamond, the locations of Vermont's blast furnaces and foundries making stoves in the 1830s (a list that I may be able to extend -- at the moment, it's just an 1831 list plus the Tyson Furnace, blown in in 1837), and (b) with a red square, the places where Vermont's 37 stove patents 1817-1850 were taken out.
NOW, these were patented works. the un-patented ones vermont made: were earlier still
infact the england these people left had stone hearths and iron wares - which reall is more efficient - russians used that more than imported stoves - so it can't be wrong
i show this humble model since there's a CHINESE GOOGLE BLACKOUT on Vermont stove makers ... only chinese and canadian "brands" are shown on google
the USA ones made in vermont - impossible to google tonight - made impracticable
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3gf3hg54
Date: November 15, 2023 03:34AM
__________________________________
this humble abode is from late 1800's, Calvin Coolige's own wood stoves
you can see they are smaller and not ornate
chances you had an iron stove in 1770's? not allot i think.
"uh yea british are at war with germans, but a ship came in with a 1 ton stove and it's at the shopping center waiting to be picked up". NOT. NOT in 1700. despite german lies that they "made stoves popular in the usa in the 1700's". bullshit. usa had blacksmiths. and people didn't have mail order catelogs to order german 1/2 ton stoves from.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
gr4h54
Date: November 15, 2023 03:38AM
__________________________________
Eighteenth Century American Stove Making
At about 1728, cast iron stoves really began to be made in quantity. These first stoves of German design, are called Five-plate or Jamb stoves.
THE GERMANS came up with idea of stuffing the stove in the chimney
i've read articles about it. it was stupid. it only worked if your chimney fit the stove or you would build a new chimney to fit it
By the 1740's, six-plate stoves, also called close stoves were being made.
(MEANING IN THE USA AND EVERYWHERE - NOT BY GERMANY ALONE)
In 1740, Benjamin Franklin improved upon the design of stoves by creating the "Pennsylvania Fireplace"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
you can always depend on WIKIPEDIA, the devil, to claim germans invented somethign first and americans were un-successful
when really: usa had the first good patents and higher production
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
W3GF343
Date: November 15, 2023 03:39AM
__________________________________
Around 1760, ten-plate stoves, similar to, but larger than, six-plate stoves were made having four more plates that form a oven and two hinged doors. Opening on either side, smoke passed around the ends of the oven and out a pipe. This is the likely genesis of all cook stoves.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3g34h5
Date: November 15, 2023 03:39AM
__________________________________
^^ yea popular at the white house
most people couldn't touch such riches, mind you
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
rg3hg43
Date: November 15, 2023 03:41AM
__________________________________
As early as 1820's the Step-top cook stove design was seen.
AT THAT TIME, THE NATION WAS RAVAGED FROM THE CIVIL WAR
they were not running out to buy new stoves from the store. they were recovering stones from old walls to fix their hearth. things were not "good"
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
4fg3gh43
Date: November 15, 2023 03:48AM
__________________________________
BANKS WEREN'T HANDING OUT IRON STOVES AS DOOR PRISES ...
infact there was a nationwise debt on iron
the Greates Railroad, the first Continental Railroad, was being laid across the nation
the engines alone weight a million pounds each of iron and steel, they could pull a million tons (as much or more than today's could)
"people were getting iron stoves in great numbers in 1820's" ??
industry was racing TO BEGIN the industrial revolution 1820's. 1830's they were using all the iron they could find to build locomotives and rail.
i would not bet 500lb of iron came cheap at the store when industry and military needed as much as they could find.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3w4tg34hg
Date: November 15, 2023 03:52AM
__________________________________
it would be well after 1830's people could "buy an iron stove"
because you arent' haulting stoves across usa on horse ... not to any average buyer. perhaps some rich son of a bitch.
you can do that with a train that can haul 1,000,000+ lb of cargo, yes
and that would be when stove making "really could be spread out"
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3gh34
Date: November 15, 2023 04:40AM
__________________________________
I looked into stoves and or some other "colonial riches", quickly found they were european not built in the colonies by "skilled craftsman" (not yet).
It turns out some of America's herititage stash (that can be found in museum or for sale) WAS NEVER FOR SALE in the colonies.
They didn't have shopping malls filled with imports for Colonitst to buy. Colonists could likely only afford what was made IN THAT COLONY perhaps from a nearby hit or something cheap / highly available from europe. (cloth for one thing they likely relied on - though they came over with a bunch jic right)
Feudal Lords of England or elsewhere came over with these things as their property when they moved into a home built for them on foreign coin.
They didn't "move to the colony and buy a german stove from the store", it came on the ship with their possessions.
It would get into Colonists hands only when that family "gave up the ghost on it" and were willing to give the colonist "such an advantage" that might be used against them - those feudalist minded bastards they were ! :)
Some were kept and became heritage colonial items. But they weren't from the colony at all.
They came "with the feudal families" into homes and kept there a long spell.
THEY WERE WAR DROBES, and that means they were items which were paid for with war, perhaps. business, perhaps. but at anyrate, calling a box a war drobe became popular with the English - perhaps the colonists at the time resented the term.
it wasn't just the rich. fast forward to later america you'll find evidence there were allot of BAD people (won't say who this article) who ... they would sell you let you have somethign which might make your family have "the extra time to, say, make a business" then compete with their family. something like that, a sure tool: was not for sale except to someone higher up willing to take a dive to get it.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
rhnje454
Date: November 17, 2023 10:36AM
__________________________________
Re: AMAZING Video and Photo evidence: no democrats were shot for entering State Houses previously. Ashli's murder WAS THE FIRST.
and AOC wasn't in the building, she lied
and there was NO WARNING SHOT
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/3553343/4086240.html#msg-4086240
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
34g3rbn5
Date: November 18, 2023 07:49AM
__________________________________
.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3g345h
Date: November 18, 2023 08:41AM
__________________________________
there were people around she didn't appear to be aware of the sole officer "a distance from her" - who said he was guarding the door but was far from it
LATER THEY SHOWED DC NIGGERS, PRETENDING TO BE POLICE, RUNNING THROUGH CONGRESS AREAS WITH WEAPONS telling Congress to "leave their business of discussing the joe biden votes" - but no protestors in the said areas. only threatened congress people threatend by DC niggers dressed as "undercover guards"
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
oops i forgot
Date: November 18, 2023 08:57AM
__________________________________
or that they had nigger asian mexican agent agitators in the crowd including pipe bombs
THE POINT IS, THEY IMMEDIATELY SAID "BIDEN WON AND ASHLEY WAS A BITCH AND DESERVED TO DIE"
whathisname Conolly WMAL, supposedly conservative but actually A FUCKIGN DEMOCRAT LIVING IN MARYLAND
IMMEDIATLEY GOT ON THE RADIO and began saying ashley deserved to die and biden won. he had GERMAN SS military and niggers on the radio stating the same as "guests"
that same german nigger asian military was soon surrounding the capitol and "FORBIDDING A VOTE ON CONGRESS MEMBERS WHO DIDN'T HAVE THE VOTE OR WERE APPOINTED NOT ELECTED"
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
g3whb43
Date: November 18, 2023 03:01PM
__________________________________
.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
34tg34hg4
Date: November 21, 2023 04:02PM
__________________________________
when FFU spammer picks up
you have to go back and find what articles they most hate and are trying to ban without permission from cary to be a moderator
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
34tf3ghg4
Date: November 25, 2023 06:54AM
__________________________________
this is an old deal why still an article?
well trump is being prosecuted for the (is it 3rd time) now on jan 6th charges
DEMOCRATS still haven't face the law of illegal voting nor the law of fair prosecution
SO DROP DEAD DEMOCRATS, this is still ongoing
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
34rt3hh34
Date: January 03, 2024 04:41PM
__________________________________
.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
TimBotNet
Date: January 03, 2024 06:39PM
__________________________________
Boo fucking hoo! Ashley died for being a stupid cunt blindly following orders from the Angry Cheet-O. She's not a hero. She's not a martyr. She's a dead piece of shit rotting in the ground because she was stupid enough to do as the Angry Orange told her to do. Wake up, you fucking dumb fucks! Trump is a piece of shit and so it anyone who supports him. I only wish there were 99 more idiots shot and killed that day. Hopefull, there will be next time.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
Uncle Spam's partying with Mahdi
Date: January 03, 2024 09:43PM
__________________________________
Teabag Party! Everyone's coming!
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
Kel
Date: January 05, 2024 12:28AM
__________________________________
Ashley Babbitt got what she deserved… kill all treasonous traitorous trash!
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
45y45rji4
Date: December 08, 2024 12:37PM
__________________________________
when the people are tired of rip-offs and government bullying for fines and stolen welfare checks
and the gov is quite willing to use weapons to "stay in power"
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
Fagggotry
Date: December 08, 2024 01:48PM
__________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
6jiu67ykl
Date: May 04, 2026 02:02PM
__________________________________
the trouble with LYING: Jan 6 is now being "REDONE" and BLM will be also
https://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/4230655/4230655.html#msg-4230655
WMAL has turned full violent communist: full episode of white women hate of ONLY white men on Valentine's Day
If Larry O'Connor can prevent Republican women from breeding (by making them ill on Valentine's Day, for example) That's a win for democrats to have more illegal children themselves - the ULTIMATE WIN. Larry O'Connor: not your friend
Re: LARRY O'CONNOR "God wanted that woman shot." ME: "LARY - GOD WANT YOU SHOT". WMAL, WTOP DEMOCRAT brand name control issues lie after lie.
https://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/3551359/3632823.html#msg-3632823
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
Uncle Sam 101v
Date: November 14, 2023 10:34PM
__________________________________
Ashley didn't break the window. She only tried to spring through it like a kitten.
TWO NIGGERS BROKE THE WINDOW, ONE WAS SEEN ON VIDEO DROPPIGN SOMETHING THAT LOOKED LIKE A WEAPON.
THE VIDEO SHOWED THAT AS ASHLEY APPROACHED THERE WAS A LOUD VOICE
NO WARNING SHOT
other protestors were in the area
ashley was set up by niggers - every bit of the video shows niggers were hunting whites like deer
not just that - that the real reason for it all was BLM, the black whitehouse, corrupt DC taking control of federal agencies with German SS Germany Maryland protecting the capitol with german and nigger asian troops
TO PREVENT A RECOUNT BY LAW OF LEGALLY ACCEPTABLE VOTES
TO FINGER OUT THOSE APPOINTED WHO WON NO ELECTION PROCESS PROPERLY
===============================
Boston masacre
drop dead democrats
you will not do that for free in America, there will be repercussions
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3ghn54
Date: November 14, 2023 10:35PM
__________________________________
little red riding hood
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
wikipedia, the devil of BIG TECH
Date: November 14, 2023 10:48PM
__________________________________
UPLOADED BY DAILYMAIL.UK
THAT IS A FUKCING LIE
Google Images shows only EU GERMAN CHINA lie drawnings that aren't perdiod and aren't usa history.
"it was called a Massacre BECAUSE civilians were shot at by police state goons"
it helped decide George Washington and other's minds that "they were going to remove the british by killing them"
the brittish lords were just "entering cities with troops", saying they were quartered for the colonies when really they were in that colony only for the spcific purpose of bullying the single colony to pay tax to the lord that brought the troops, and to protect that lord from reprisals
BOSTON WAS NOT FOUNDED BY THE BRITISH. it was founded by people who FLED EU, the petty feudal war dictatorships that it was, to make a New World without police state. and they put it into their new laws
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3g5rhb534
Date: November 14, 2023 10:50PM
__________________________________
it was called a Massacre because they shot at un-armed civilians who "threw some snowballs" and were in general complaining about the troops being there to TAXE the living hell out of their colony while threatening anyone who didn't pay
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
gf3hb453
Date: November 14, 2023 10:52PM
__________________________________
there was no "row of blue suits with weapons"
DROP DEAD DEMOCRATS
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
w3g3rh4
Date: November 14, 2023 10:56PM
__________________________________
MARYLAND NIGGERS USING USA GRANTS
HISTORY CHANNEL (PART OF BET, BLACK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK)
"The Boston Massacre was a deadly riot that occurred on March 5, 1770, on King Street in Boston. It began as a street brawl between American colonists and a lone British soldier, but quickly escalated to a chaotic, bloody slaughter. The conflict energized anti-British sentiment and paved the way for the American Revolution. "
the fact: THAT'S A FUCKING LIE
THERE WERE MANY BRITISH SOLIDERS WITH MUSKETS THAT TAKE A LONG TIME TO RELOAD
5 civilians WERE SHOT "instantaneously" and no chance to reload
IT WAS NOT A RIOT
throwing snowballs doesn't amount to a riot
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DROP DEAD NIGGERS
USING MY TAX MONEY TO STAIN MY HISTORY DOESN'T SIT WELL WITH ME
https://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/boston-massacre
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3g3h54
Date: November 14, 2023 10:57PM
__________________________________
THERE WAS NO BRITISH SOLIDER KILLED
NOR WAS THERE ANY JAN 6 OFFICERS KILLED
THE VIDEO OF THE BOY IN THE DOOR WAS A FAKE
AND THE LATER DEATH OF A MAN WASN'T CONFIRMED TO HAVE EVEN BEEN AT THE TRUMP RALLY
AND THE BURNING OF THE CHURCH BY NIGGERS: WAS CONFIRMED WITH PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
fg3whg43
Date: November 14, 2023 11:01PM
__________________________________
March 5, 1770,
DAILYMAIL.UK, BBC, TELEMUNDO, CHINA
TRIED TO SPREAD THE RUMOR THAT THE COLONISTS ATTACKED
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
HOWEVER, THE TESTIMONY OF THE CROWD WAS THAT THE BRITISH WERE SPREADING LIES
THAT ACTUALLY - IT HAD BEGUN WITH SOME IDIOT THROWING A SNOWBALL(S)
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
TG3HG43
Date: November 14, 2023 11:25PM
__________________________________
Wikipedia - the devil
"NINE British soldiers shot several of a crowd of three or four hundred who were harassing them"
THAT ALSO WAS NOT TRUE
if it were, those soldiers would have been dead meat, since they couldn't reload a musket quickly at all
it was a small crowd, and just several civilians who were along that particular street
MY HISTORY BOOK TAUGHT ME THE BRITISH spread propaganda lies to attempt deny it all
actually, some son of (CIA) idiot begged me to sacrifice my book, i said NO WAY, but he offered his, "if i don't return the book, same as you have, the school and my mom will throw a fit". i now wonder if my book was "on someone's shit list". that home had allot of history and maps in it, wasn't a poor home either, if i remember. ANYWAY ...
"Triumph of the American Nation", Lewis Paul Todd, Merie Curi, HARCOURT PUBLISHERS (HBJ)
p. 113
The Boson Massacre
On March 5, 1770, a large crowd gathered in Boson around soliders of th 29th British Reigment*. The crowd yelled insults and threw snowballs. Such outbursts had occurred many times before. This time matters got out of hand. As the mob pressed closer against the soldiers, someone gave an order to fire. Three civilians were killend and two other mortally wounded.
One of those killed was Crispus Attucks, a former slave who'd escaped 20 years earlier from his master, and was one of the first to die (in all) of the coming struggle of the Colonies against Great Britain.
As news of the shooting spread, the peple of Boston went wild with anger. A "massacre" they called the affair. They also demanded the British withdraw all troops from their city.
Later, when passions had cooled somewhat, the British solders were tried for muder**. They were defended by Josiah Quincy Jr and John Adams, who later bacame the 2nd President of the United States. Neither of these men had any sympathy for the British, but they insisted that every person was entitled to a fair trial. All except two of the soldiers were aquitted. These two were convicted of manslaughter but were release soon after****
___________________________________________
* NOTE ALREADY ONE LIE EXPOSED, about there being only 1 soldier who was bullied. bullying was why those soliders were in the town
** the british soliders were tried for murder
*** boston as a town demanded all soldiers leave the boston colony
**** John Adams however, would participate in a death penalty for many british in the coming days, called the American Revolution
and while i know not all history books are of great accuracy, i know this to be true: that MANY colonists witnessed the event and testified exactly as was written above
AND THAT'S WHY I KEPT MY HISTORY BOOKS
I KNEW, SINCE A CHILD, EXACTLY THIS CLINTONITE GENERATION WOULD TRY TO STEAL MY HISTORY
AND THEY DID TRY
BUT FAILED
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
hg4tjn45
Date: November 14, 2023 11:33PM
__________________________________
"there was only a single soldier protecting all the Lord's gold and was being beaten up by protestors" A BRITISH LIE
"there was a young officer killed by protestors who crushed him maliciously" IS A BBC LIE, the boy wasn't even the person later claimed dead at the DC NIGGER hospital
take NEWS from the people who did a massacre: obviously all lies
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
b3rbn3
Date: November 14, 2023 11:40PM
__________________________________
BRANDING ON THE THUMB
with a blacksmiths cattle brand. to mark permanently and painfully this person's deeds so that they could not be hidden later.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
g3bh4
Date: November 15, 2023 12:07AM
__________________________________
i forgot: the last history book was copyright 1950 however a 1982 edition. allot of race cards in the book i feel added well after 1950. permissions to copy go to 1936 and then to 1650 - so it's even older, the sources. also - a proffessor edited it, not merely a teacher hack upload.
a much later history book, edited by clintonite, shows lies beginning to develope. it says "colonists generally didn't believe the soldiers were at fault". THAT'S A LIE. THE BOSTON MASSACRE was big news spread across the colonies. And most news (except in bully dictatorship colonies) read "it was a MASSACRE of 5 civilians", going on to explain how it occurred by testimony of the same boston people who were in the crowd. all who would convict the soldiers no doubt given the choice.
"THE AMERICAN PAST, A Survey of American History", Joseph R. Conlin, 3RD ed, 1990, 1984 Harcourt HBJ (NOTE - SAME PUBLISHER as the previous same year practically). all past copyright are denied and a long list of teachers are given instead.
The Boston Massacre
On March 5, 1770, the day the Townshend Duties were repealed, the weather in Boston was frigid. The streets were icy, and heaps of gritty snow blocked the cobbled gutters. No doubt aggravated by the severity of the winter, which brought unemployment as well as discomfort, some men and boys exchanged words with British soldiers who were patrolling the streets. From a handful of hecklers there grew a crowd, many cursing and throwing snowballs at the redcoats. A few dared them to use their muskets.
(me - note how this is is all edited to make it appear as the colonists were guilty and asked to be shot. IT'S A LIE. and this book has TONS more race cards than the other: it's been hacked by democrats)
When the mob pressed to close on King Street, acking th esoliders against a wall, they fired. Five in the crowd, including a boy and a black seaman named Crispus Attucks, fell dead. Boston, scarcely more than a town at 15,000 population, was shocked. A few men who had been active in the Stamp Act crisis tried to revive anti-British feelings. Silversmith Paul Revere (THE BRITISH ARE COMING! THE BRITISH ARE COMING! a man true to his word and deeds) prepared (some say plagiarized) an engraving that depcted soldiers aggressively attacking innocent people. Samuel Adams, a former brewer, circulated pritns of the picture of the "Boston Massacre". Joseph Warren, a physician, passionaltely embroidered on the theme. "Take heed, ye orphan babes," he told the public meeting, "lest, whilst your streaming eyes are fixed upon the ghastly corpse, your feel slide on the stones be spattered with your father's brains.
But the agitation failed to bear fruit (it as published to all colonies, california-china 1990's says it failed. that's A LIE). Most people blamed the incident on the mob. (not true - it helped convince the people to join the Revolution). John Adams**, cousin of Samuel and friend of Warren, agreed to represent the accused soldiers in court. He was nobody's stooge, least of all of the British. John Adams was strong headed to the point of self-righteousness and a strident critic of British policies****. IN arguing the redcoats' case, Adams roundly criticized the practice of stationing professional soldiers in cities like Boston*****.
"Soldiers quartered in a populous town will always occasion two mobs where they preent one," he said. "They are wretched conservators of the peace." Nevertheless, Adams argued that British policy and an unsavory mob, not the indicated redcoats (soliders), bore the blame for the tragedy of March 5. The jury agreed, acquitting all the defendants save two and sentencing them only to branding on the thumb, a slap on the wrist by eighteenth-century standards."
_____________________________
** note this idiot book admits adams called it a massacre then says Adams believed it was the colonists fault. THE BOOK IS FULL OF CROSS TESTIMONY LIES, uk lies)
**** they are tryin to say if Adams fought for innocence then all the news the BRITISH tried to spread was true, "there was only 1 young soldier protecting all the lord's gold and being beaten", total lies. Adams however sent out a death penalty for many british by not just partaking but in the construction of the American Revolution.
***** it was their only good defense, that the lord had put them there as bullies to collect taxes and as such, were only there by themselves being bullied into the "job"
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
yj5m65
Date: November 15, 2023 12:12AM
__________________________________
this last book made several attempts to blame the colonists and exhonerate the british
BUT ADAMS DID NOT. he only suggested leniency.
AS A MATTER OF DIPLOMACY from a man who would be arranging, in secrecy, a plan of Revolutionary War? It would be best not to rile Great Britain's ire in the matter.
It would be best to be lenient here, so not to be fingered as a Revolution participant before the main event.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
history theory
Adams gave a fair argument
However his purpose to be light handed was political - to ease immediate backlash from the British. So that the British would not send extra troops to "liberate the 5 and further bother the colonists of Boston".
that'd be what i'd do as Adams, if i were so smart as he
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3g3hb45
Date: November 15, 2023 12:13AM
__________________________________
they were there to bully the people for inflation
they did a massacre to stay in control
STOP THE STEAL
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
34g34hg
Date: November 15, 2023 12:23AM
__________________________________
these GOOGLE Image hits are TOTAL LIES. and they are from asian servers, eu ukraine servers etc.
STUDY.COM, a clinton obama biden REGIME, says i must "sign in using legitimate school password" to read what they are teaching kids
it says in headline that "Boston civilians were rioting", AND IMMEDIATELY THAT IS A LIE. it began with words and a snowball: not a riot in general at all. a riot of one is not a riot.
IT SAYS COLONISTS THREW STONES - that's a lie, no other history source shows proof of that nor any proof of soldier injury. all went to trial WITHOUT a hospital visit infact.
(if a boston man throws a rock at you, you are going down, you might not live to tell about it)
NO EVIDENCE ANY STONE WERE THROW WAS HAD. THE COLONISTS DENIED IT.
infact, history i heard was "they claimed the snow was ice, and so might harm them", never heard the "rocks" at all!
WHERE: WHAT SOURCE WHAT BOOK!! OBAMA YOU FUCKING NIGGER LIAR.
https://study.com/learn/lesson/boston-massacre-causes-facts.html.html
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3wg3h4
Date: November 15, 2023 12:29AM
__________________________________
THERE'S A POINT ADAMS MISSED and all the historians are failing on.
The colonists wanted the british soldiers to leave. They knew the heavy taxes and awful "policies being enforced" were only possible by having weapons pointed at them.
The RALLY of persons, (no farming today, too snowy), WERE TELLING THE BRITISH TO LEAVE THE STREET, GO HOME, BACK OFF, LEAVE THE COUNTRY.
The soldiers staunchly stood their ground but it was STOLEN GROUND. And that's what does make it the soldiers fault moreso their Lord's fault. They knew it was time to leave they VOLUNTEERED to stay and bully Boston. That makes it a crime of their own.
However Adams was right: it was certainly not the time to rile the British at this time. Doing so might make things allot more difficult for the Revolution.
(some idiot book above said they were un-employed. that's so stupid it's incredible. winter colonies did not "spur manufacturing during the winter", that's not the story of colonies OMG!!!)
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3tg3h43
Date: November 15, 2023 12:38AM
__________________________________
However Adams may not have been a genius.
He probably spoke with the Lord, the lord wanting to protect his men, probably told Adams the political facts were that murder convictions would lead to British reprisals not to Boston's advantage.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
304984
Date: November 15, 2023 12:58AM
__________________________________
GOOGLE HAS actually blocked all images for "throwing stones" from old testament, repacing them with new artwork of people carrying heavy stones and using them as hammers (obviously that's not THROWING)
GOOGLE has also blocked "THROWING THE FIRST STONE", no image has stone throwing at all.
1700's people were fit, tough farmer laborer types - not today's protester trash
THROWING STONES WAS USED TO KILL THE DAMNED
if several 1770's farmers are throwing ICE, and STONE at you, your not going home. you'll have broken bones or be dead**
THE BRITISH LIED. THEIR SOLDIERS HAD NO SERIOUS INJURIES FROM BEING STONED
** if the colonists had been doing that, they greatly outnumbered the troops - they would have exterminated the troops quickly. the well minded colonists stood back. THEN PROSECUTED THE SOLIDERS. LATER - they made the british leave. later.
infact the 5 most responsible were ready to stand trial immediately but the trial was delayed to allow the town to settle down - not to allow the "soldiers to heal to stand trial"
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
ewgf3hg4
Date: November 15, 2023 01:00AM
__________________________________
Jackie Chan once killed half a Dojo with the throwing of one stone. True story.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
4tf3ghg43
Date: November 15, 2023 01:21AM
__________________________________
The Winter employment line in Boston, 1770. Did that history book above quote "they were out of work"?
That's right, they were busy keep warm, getting water, vising the town store house (rotting grain?! bleh, best served with beer) for food.
the colonies did have have tradesman. but in the winter you aren't "traveling to the next state on your horse" unless you must. too much chance of freezing to death.
their trades were to use their own land (was free not bought probably), do their trade (with wood iron or stone probably), and sell this in town (to a store house which resold it probably)
THERE WEREN'T EMPLOYEMENT CENTERS. THERE WEREN'T WINTER MANUFACTURING CHANGE-OVERS. The british lord taxed in the winter: but didn't "hire in the winter" unless so his fat ass didn't have to fetch fire wood himself.
in 1770's a girl with that height probably would have been deemed an amazon woman and sent to another town in fear she "might cause trouble"
hur hur, found this piece of wood out back!
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3gh5
Date: November 15, 2023 01:22AM
__________________________________
When SHE brings in the wood, it's alreay burning!
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
rgh4eh54
Date: November 15, 2023 01:23AM
__________________________________
and for that reason: probably a witch!
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3wg35rh4
Date: November 15, 2023 01:28AM
__________________________________
"THE AMERICAN PAST, A Survey of American History", Joseph R. Conlin, 3RD ed, 1990, 1984 Harcourt HBJ",
"... which brought unemployment as well as discomfort ..."
I SURJECT THAT WAS NOT THE CASE, that the colonies did not have "everyone in formal employment else starving in the winter"
THAT IS A BRITISH KING / BOSSES RULERSHIP. That's not how the Colonies worked at all inside.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
gf3hb34
Date: November 15, 2023 02:08AM
__________________________________
probably not from 1770's, but you get the point
BONTON EMPLOYMENT 1770's
* STAYING WARM. many trips to wood pile. hearth tending. clothing refits and misfits and drying ice off them clothes. strip em off. WAS AN EMPLOYMENT.
* the store house of grain was not infinite. they likely hunted, trapped, fished to supplant their non-growing winter crop which was: nothing. nothign grew.
FISHING
, deer, ...
SUPPLIES WILL ARRIVE IN THE SPRING - little wait on outsource foods from the south. actually the south didn't have a supply train to feed northern colonies in winter. never happened in colonial america like that. perhaps a few arranged rescues occurred. travel was dangerous. freeze to death, no gas stations or police if you get stuck on the road; dead. wooden wheels in winter? doubtful bets.
* bumbing off those large British ships. (can't be sure but i assume some of that they tried)
*
and more fishing
*
DON'T LEAN BACK IN THAT CHAIR!!
NAILS WON'T BE ARRIVIN' UNTIL THE SPRING, and i ain't gonna sit on the floor all winter
*
after you read that a week, it's going in the fire or used like Brawny
* CONTRARY TO POPULAR PHOTOS, YOUR WINTER SHIP IS NOT COMING IN ...
in Boston 1770 winter - probably few ships and 1/2 were taking not bringing. the citizens were not "fed up" for no reason.
Frozen Boston Harbor
Posted on February 15, 2015 by BHB
February 2015 will likely go down in history for its snow and ice. The rivers that empty into the southern side of the harbor have become particularly backed up ice, that has extended far into the harbor, and has been … Continue reading
From the 1400s people became "braver" and more inclined to voyage in the winter (in part because of new ships types), but 1569 Venice decided to reintroduce a ban on sailing between 15.11- 20.1 due to the number of shipwrecks.
Empoyment Boston 1770's:
Stay warm stay alive, see you in the Spring
Don't miss Church though, or you can be booted out with the British.
"Friends, let not though neighbor suffer and freeze."
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3g45hj5
Date: November 15, 2023 02:11AM
__________________________________
wikipedia (my guess)
"the british kept the colonies fed in the winter" (lies)
THE TRUTH
without modern diesel engines and a steel hull: boston is a real problem for ships potentially
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3g35h
Date: November 15, 2023 02:20AM
__________________________________
that's 1856 artwork
while there may have been sleigh in 1770's Boston - i'm unsure they had things so well down
you know, you carried firewood to your own house - not across town - unless you had horses and business supplyign someone else
1770's boston had blacksmiths. some had sleighs we can guess.
your picture of 1770's massacre was denizens out on foot. not horsed or cruizing around on sleds.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
w3rgh35h
Date: November 15, 2023 02:24AM
__________________________________
how they kept horses alive in the winter, i'm unsure
but the above fellows are doing a good job of trying to kill one, probably
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3hgh5
Date: November 15, 2023 02:30AM
__________________________________
Plymouth Colony was right next door to BOSTON
the Massachusetts Bay Colony
Plymouth played a central role in King Philip's War (1675–1678), one of several Indian Wars, but the colony was ultimately merged with the Massachusetts Bay Colony and other territories in 1691 to form the Province of Massachusetts Bay.
THAT'S A LIE. PLYMOUTH WAS SUPPLIED BY PRIVATE ENTERPRISE THAT CAME UP SHORT. NOT BY THE KING.
THEY RAN FROM EUROPE AND THE KING AND EUROPE.
WIKIPEDIA HAS EDITED ALL ARTICLES TO SAY UK had supplied the world richly in History, the savior of many. it's simply not true. infact they ran pirate ships so did the spanish.
INDIANS WERE IN PLYMOUTH, and they attacked the Colony. colonists defended themselves. british came along after, the skunks they are, and began "charging taxes" by virtue "their military was well armed and over here"
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3G35H53
Date: November 15, 2023 02:39AM
__________________________________
i didn't think of that, that certain beasts not native to boston might be usable for burden in the snow
but i would guess certainly not "allow of people"
* MILKING COWS. cows could eat grass in winter probably give some milk. just a guess.
* killing chicken for soup, which weren't surviving the winter well anyway ...
*
MORE Clinton Obama lies: "what school was like in the Colonies"
fact is: they didn't necessarily have it
kids back then WORKED. some never went to school.
it wasn't until the INDUSTRIAL AGE that it became law kids must attend so as not to be abused in factories
fact is: the colonies, many, didn't have separate purpose built school houses built.
What School Was Like in the 13 Colonies
History Channel
Sep 6, 2022 — A child's education was anything but “standardized” during America's colonial era, which spanned most of the 17th and 18th centuries.
The American Colonial Period (1600-1776): Most...
Sutori
The American Colonial Period (1600-1776): Most education took place in the home. If the parents were able they taught their kids basic reading and ...
ok one mother fucker says schools were like religion and always were mandatory
the other says they mostly didn't exist
SOMEONE IS LYING LIKE HELL, AND LIKELY IT'S CLINTON OBAMA
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
34g45h
Date: November 15, 2023 02:41AM
__________________________________
"what school was like in colonial america"
REALLY OBAMA? just like that huh?
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3gh54
Date: November 15, 2023 02:42AM
__________________________________
https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
that pro democrat "lying about the past" was from black entertainment channel public fund operated
THE HISTORY CHANNEL
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3g3h54
Date: November 15, 2023 02:43AM
__________________________________
you might have an old woman in a church teaching some kids - and it may have been called "bible lessons" not "school", that'd all depend on the town
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3b4b5
Date: November 15, 2023 02:45AM
__________________________________
the place of teaching ... probably her home or the church
probably doing it in exchange for clothing at the town or to keep up favors to keep the town appeased it ... kinda fell on her to do
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
23gh435h4
Date: November 15, 2023 02:47AM
__________________________________
* BURYING PEOPLE
unfortunately, another fact of early colonies was a more random life expectancy and keeping somewhat of a cold shoulder to death, since it was only to be expected
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
rghb54r
Date: November 15, 2023 02:48AM
__________________________________
if bible reading was done, perhaps penning one's essays to stretch out time on winter nights
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3wg3hg45
Date: November 15, 2023 03:06AM
__________________________________
To "be employed" in the winter of 1770's ...
my not so subtle point
you had to have ALL your bases coveed at home
* probably fire going / not out (likey requires a wife and kids)
* warm clothing dried read
* not far from town or have horse
* supplies
it's not like you'd go in town in your car and bring home groceries from the grocery store and your thermostat kept the house warm
IT TOOK PERHAPS ALL THE TIME YOU HAD - just making sure you were safe, and helping your neighbor, during the winter
some could go to the city no doubt for some limited time in the winter. but it was the few who could.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3h4h5
Date: November 15, 2023 03:27AM
__________________________________
CABIN FEVER
not some joke. people died from carbon monoxide from the fires they kept to stay warm.
staying indoors allot, and poisoning: led to CABIN FEVER.
(PROBABLY why some were angry at the british - some in the the town were no doubt cranky in the winter somewhat)
try and get your firewood with cabin fever when your week from poor winter supplies. not as easy as it sounds.
Benjamin Franklin
worked on a "better fireplace" which among things TRIED TO PREVENT gas poisoning deaths for the colonies. he wasn't the only - many tried it and mostly only that did had them. they generally didn't get sold and installed as they hoped. the only thing that did was the classic style iron wood burning stove. which no doubt was not in ample supply 1770's
"The first wood-burning stove was patented in Strasbourg GERMANY in 1557"
HUGE LIES. chinese way way before. and germans weren't the first in europe either.
THE NEXT NAZZI LIE WAS GOOGLED: THAT GERMANY PRIVIDED STOVES TO USA IN 1700'S 1800'S AND ONWARD
THE TRUTH IS A DAMN COLD PLACE IN USA HAD BLACKSMITH WHO, GUESS WHAT, MADE STOVES THAT WERE POPULAR IN USA
http://stovehistory.blogspot.com/2015/08/vermont-stove-inventors-inventions-and.html
Vermont Stove Inventors, Inventions, and their Makers, 1817-1850 {TBA}
This map shows (a) with a black diamond, the locations of Vermont's blast furnaces and foundries making stoves in the 1830s (a list that I may be able to extend -- at the moment, it's just an 1831 list plus the Tyson Furnace, blown in in 1837), and (b) with a red square, the places where Vermont's 37 stove patents 1817-1850 were taken out.
NOW, these were patented works. the un-patented ones vermont made: were earlier still
infact the england these people left had stone hearths and iron wares - which reall is more efficient - russians used that more than imported stoves - so it can't be wrong
i show this humble model since there's a CHINESE GOOGLE BLACKOUT on Vermont stove makers ... only chinese and canadian "brands" are shown on google
the USA ones made in vermont - impossible to google tonight - made impracticable
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3gf3hg54
Date: November 15, 2023 03:34AM
__________________________________
this humble abode is from late 1800's, Calvin Coolige's own wood stoves
you can see they are smaller and not ornate
chances you had an iron stove in 1770's? not allot i think.
"uh yea british are at war with germans, but a ship came in with a 1 ton stove and it's at the shopping center waiting to be picked up". NOT. NOT in 1700. despite german lies that they "made stoves popular in the usa in the 1700's". bullshit. usa had blacksmiths. and people didn't have mail order catelogs to order german 1/2 ton stoves from.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
gr4h54
Date: November 15, 2023 03:38AM
__________________________________
Eighteenth Century American Stove Making
At about 1728, cast iron stoves really began to be made in quantity. These first stoves of German design, are called Five-plate or Jamb stoves.
THE GERMANS came up with idea of stuffing the stove in the chimney
i've read articles about it. it was stupid. it only worked if your chimney fit the stove or you would build a new chimney to fit it
By the 1740's, six-plate stoves, also called close stoves were being made.
(MEANING IN THE USA AND EVERYWHERE - NOT BY GERMANY ALONE)
In 1740, Benjamin Franklin improved upon the design of stoves by creating the "Pennsylvania Fireplace"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
you can always depend on WIKIPEDIA, the devil, to claim germans invented somethign first and americans were un-successful
when really: usa had the first good patents and higher production
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
W3GF343
Date: November 15, 2023 03:39AM
__________________________________
Around 1760, ten-plate stoves, similar to, but larger than, six-plate stoves were made having four more plates that form a oven and two hinged doors. Opening on either side, smoke passed around the ends of the oven and out a pipe. This is the likely genesis of all cook stoves.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3g34h5
Date: November 15, 2023 03:39AM
__________________________________
^^ yea popular at the white house
most people couldn't touch such riches, mind you
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
rg3hg43
Date: November 15, 2023 03:41AM
__________________________________
As early as 1820's the Step-top cook stove design was seen.
AT THAT TIME, THE NATION WAS RAVAGED FROM THE CIVIL WAR
they were not running out to buy new stoves from the store. they were recovering stones from old walls to fix their hearth. things were not "good"
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
4fg3gh43
Date: November 15, 2023 03:48AM
__________________________________
BANKS WEREN'T HANDING OUT IRON STOVES AS DOOR PRISES ...
infact there was a nationwise debt on iron
the Greates Railroad, the first Continental Railroad, was being laid across the nation
the engines alone weight a million pounds each of iron and steel, they could pull a million tons (as much or more than today's could)
"people were getting iron stoves in great numbers in 1820's" ??
industry was racing TO BEGIN the industrial revolution 1820's. 1830's they were using all the iron they could find to build locomotives and rail.
i would not bet 500lb of iron came cheap at the store when industry and military needed as much as they could find.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3w4tg34hg
Date: November 15, 2023 03:52AM
__________________________________
it would be well after 1830's people could "buy an iron stove"
because you arent' haulting stoves across usa on horse ... not to any average buyer. perhaps some rich son of a bitch.
you can do that with a train that can haul 1,000,000+ lb of cargo, yes
and that would be when stove making "really could be spread out"
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3gh34
Date: November 15, 2023 04:40AM
__________________________________
hate to end off-topic on stoves but there's an interesting history point for last
I looked into stoves and or some other "colonial riches", quickly found they were european not built in the colonies by "skilled craftsman" (not yet).
It turns out some of America's herititage stash (that can be found in museum or for sale) WAS NEVER FOR SALE in the colonies.
They didn't have shopping malls filled with imports for Colonitst to buy. Colonists could likely only afford what was made IN THAT COLONY perhaps from a nearby hit or something cheap / highly available from europe. (cloth for one thing they likely relied on - though they came over with a bunch jic right)
Feudal Lords of England or elsewhere came over with these things as their property when they moved into a home built for them on foreign coin.
They didn't "move to the colony and buy a german stove from the store", it came on the ship with their possessions.
It would get into Colonists hands only when that family "gave up the ghost on it" and were willing to give the colonist "such an advantage" that might be used against them - those feudalist minded bastards they were ! :)
Some were kept and became heritage colonial items. But they weren't from the colony at all.
They came "with the feudal families" into homes and kept there a long spell.
THEY WERE WAR DROBES, and that means they were items which were paid for with war, perhaps. business, perhaps. but at anyrate, calling a box a war drobe became popular with the English - perhaps the colonists at the time resented the term.
it wasn't just the rich. fast forward to later america you'll find evidence there were allot of BAD people (won't say who this article) who ... they would sell you let you have somethign which might make your family have "the extra time to, say, make a business" then compete with their family. something like that, a sure tool: was not for sale except to someone higher up willing to take a dive to get it.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
rhnje454
Date: November 17, 2023 10:36AM
__________________________________
Re: AMAZING Video and Photo evidence: no democrats were shot for entering State Houses previously. Ashli's murder WAS THE FIRST.
and AOC wasn't in the building, she lied
and there was NO WARNING SHOT
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/3553343/4086240.html#msg-4086240
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
34g3rbn5
Date: November 18, 2023 07:49AM
__________________________________
.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
3g345h
Date: November 18, 2023 08:41AM
__________________________________
Ashley jogged up to the door. was leaping through the door like a kitten
hearing "orders" she turned breifly and continued
IT'S CLEAR SHE DIDN'T SEE AN ARMED AGGRESSOR ABOUT TO SHOOT HER
she'd heard allot of yelling, people were in the area, and heard allot of wanton "commands" being barked out and not enforced
she'd had no chance to know she was about to be shot
THE NIGGER KNEW THAT - he was eliminating a white woman - who could have white kids
he lied and said "the area was special", but it was not. the most special person, Trump, was outside unharmed by the crowd infact
there were people around she didn't appear to be aware of the sole officer "a distance from her" - who said he was guarding the door but was far from it
LATER THEY SHOWED DC NIGGERS, PRETENDING TO BE POLICE, RUNNING THROUGH CONGRESS AREAS WITH WEAPONS telling Congress to "leave their business of discussing the joe biden votes" - but no protestors in the said areas. only threatened congress people threatend by DC niggers dressed as "undercover guards"
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
oops i forgot
Date: November 18, 2023 08:57AM
__________________________________
the point here isn't only they killed her ...
or that they had nigger asian mexican agent agitators in the crowd including pipe bombs
THE POINT IS, THEY IMMEDIATELY SAID "BIDEN WON AND ASHLEY WAS A BITCH AND DESERVED TO DIE"
whathisname Conolly WMAL, supposedly conservative but actually A FUCKIGN DEMOCRAT LIVING IN MARYLAND
IMMEDIATLEY GOT ON THE RADIO and began saying ashley deserved to die and biden won. he had GERMAN SS military and niggers on the radio stating the same as "guests"
that same german nigger asian military was soon surrounding the capitol and "FORBIDDING A VOTE ON CONGRESS MEMBERS WHO DIDN'T HAVE THE VOTE OR WERE APPOINTED NOT ELECTED"
the point is - democrats didn't even say sorry. not for blm. not for ashley. not for inflating the economy and hiriign illegals instead of whites
and for that - THEY CAN DIE
#WEOUTNUMBERYOU is their motto. may they rot in hell
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
g3whb43
Date: November 18, 2023 03:01PM
__________________________________
.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
34tg34hg4
Date: November 21, 2023 04:02PM
__________________________________
when FFU spammer picks up
you have to go back and find what articles they most hate and are trying to ban without permission from cary to be a moderator
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
34tf3ghg4
Date: November 25, 2023 06:54AM
__________________________________
this is an old deal why still an article?
well trump is being prosecuted for the (is it 3rd time) now on jan 6th charges
DEMOCRATS still haven't face the law of illegal voting nor the law of fair prosecution
SO DROP DEAD DEMOCRATS, this is still ongoing
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
34rt3hh34
Date: January 03, 2024 04:41PM
__________________________________
.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
TimBotNet
Date: January 03, 2024 06:39PM
__________________________________
Boo fucking hoo! Ashley died for being a stupid cunt blindly following orders from the Angry Cheet-O. She's not a hero. She's not a martyr. She's a dead piece of shit rotting in the ground because she was stupid enough to do as the Angry Orange told her to do. Wake up, you fucking dumb fucks! Trump is a piece of shit and so it anyone who supports him. I only wish there were 99 more idiots shot and killed that day. Hopefull, there will be next time.
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
Uncle Spam's partying with Mahdi
Date: January 03, 2024 09:43PM
__________________________________
Teabag Party! Everyone's coming!
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
Kel
Date: January 05, 2024 12:28AM
__________________________________
Ashley Babbitt got what she deserved… kill all treasonous traitorous trash!
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
45y45rji4
Date: December 08, 2024 12:37PM
__________________________________
when the people are tired of rip-offs and government bullying for fines and stolen welfare checks
and the gov is quite willing to use weapons to "stay in power"
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
Fagggotry
Date: December 08, 2024 01:48PM
__________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Posted by:
6jiu67ykl
Date: May 04, 2026 02:02PM
__________________________________
the trouble with LYING: Jan 6 is now being "REDONE" and BLM will be also
https://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/4230655/4230655.html#msg-4230655
WMAL has turned full violent communist: full episode of white women hate of ONLY white men on Valentine's Day
If Larry O'Connor can prevent Republican women from breeding (by making them ill on Valentine's Day, for example) That's a win for democrats to have more illegal children themselves - the ULTIMATE WIN. Larry O'Connor: not your friend
Re: LARRY O'CONNOR "God wanted that woman shot." ME: "LARY - GOD WANT YOU SHOT". WMAL, WTOP DEMOCRAT brand name control issues lie after lie.
https://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/3551359/3632823.html#msg-3632823
Re: Boston Massacre v. January 6th, the murder of Ashley Babbit
Posted by:
hu56j
()
Date: May 04, 2026 04:23PM
.
Re: Boston Massacre v. January 6th, the murder of Ashley Babbit
Posted by:
ght546
()
Date: May 04, 2026 04:43PM
.
Re: Boston Massacre v. January 6th, the murder of Ashley Babbit
Posted by:
44h
()
Date: May 07, 2026 06:05PM
.
Re: Boston Massacre v. January 6th, the murder of Ashley Babbit
Posted by:
yhj656
()
Date: May 08, 2026 12:35PM
.
Re: Boston Massacre v. January 6th, the murder of Ashley Babbit
Posted by:
4egh4h
()
Date: May 09, 2026 01:32PM
.