How do we feel about burning the american flag in public now in 2010?
Are there still some backwards thinking clueless citizens that are against it?

"WE" a damn frenchman on the FFXU

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/31/2010 04:56AM by dika-dika.
Attachments:

Feel free to light the flag on fire, after wrapping it around yourself.

==================================================================================================
"And if any women or children get their legs torn off, or faces caved in, well, it's tough shit for them." -2LT. Bert Stiles, 505th, 339th (On Berlin Bombardier Mission, 1944).

why would you want to burn a flag? flags are expensive.


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."

they shoot you if you lay a hand on flag with disrespect where I am from...I am against burning American flag and I am not even American ! it should be illegal and people should serve jail time..

I'm against burning the flag, but I don't shit on those who do because it's their right here in the US to take, take, take and never sacrifice their freedoms for the good of others then burn the flag representing those freedoms. What goes around will eventually come around..
KARMA IS A BITCH!!

Using a very broad defentition of 'speech", flag burning is protected. But in my view it falls into a different catergory, more like arson or cross burning.

And for all you buttwads who wanna show how "deep thinking" and "tolerant" you are by "supporting the right to do something you don't agree with"- fuck you in advance, thanks.

idontlikebeingrightaboutshitlikethisbutiam



Edited 21 time(s). Last edit at 5/31/1967 05:57AM by WingNut.

Last edit at 11/30/2015 01:37PM Last edit at 5/14/2015 03:52PM Last edit at 1/28/2014 05:57AM Last edit at 11/29/2015 01:10PM Last edit at 3/14/2011 11:52PM Last edit at 7/20/2012 04:07AM
Last edit at 6/29/2013 11:18PM Last edit at 3/19/2011 01:02PM Last edit at 3/26/2012 09:07PM

Ironic that the proper way to dispose of an american flag is to burn it.

Burned in a controlled, almost ceremonial setting by a VFW codger.
Not in the street by some wild bearded goofball in pajama pants and sandals.

ironical Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ironic that the proper way to dispose of an
> american flag is to burn it.

idontlikebeingrightaboutshitlikethisbutiam



Edited 21 time(s). Last edit at 5/31/1967 05:57AM by WingNut.

Last edit at 11/30/2015 01:37PM Last edit at 5/14/2015 03:52PM Last edit at 1/28/2014 05:57AM Last edit at 11/29/2015 01:10PM Last edit at 3/14/2011 11:52PM Last edit at 7/20/2012 04:07AM
Last edit at 6/29/2013 11:18PM Last edit at 3/19/2011 01:02PM Last edit at 3/26/2012 09:07PM

WingNut Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Burned in a controlled, almost ceremonial setting
> by a VFW codger.
> Not in the street by some wild bearded goofball in
> pajama pants and sandals.


+1

WingNut Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Burned in a controlled, almost ceremonial setting
> by a VFW codger.
> Not in the street by some wild bearded goofball in
> pajama pants and sandals.
>
> ironical Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Ironic that the proper way to dispose of an
> > american flag is to burn it.


A ban on flag burning for reasons other than fire safety is sick and un-american. Hitler banned flag burning when he was in charge of his country. I pray that this country never gets to that level of hate and ignorance.

Sorry but rules are rules. It is seen as a sign of disrespect and
should be illegal. Just like these migrant illegals that flood our
country from Mexico should be illegal. If it is legal for you to
burn a flag, then it should be legal to burn the person burning the
flag, PROVIDED THEY ARE DOING IT ON AMERICAN SOIL. It is not a form
of free speach, but a physical declaration of war, especially if done
in public by a group of people.

May you burn like the flags you wish to destroy.


.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

+Troll@AOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sorry but rules are rules. It is seen as a sign
> of disrespect and
> should be illegal. Just like these migrant
> illegals that flood our
> country from Mexico should be illegal. If it is
> legal for you to
> burn a flag, then it should be legal to burn the
> person burning the
> flag, PROVIDED THEY ARE DOING IT ON AMERICAN SOIL.
> It is not a form
> of free speach, but a physical declaration of war,
> especially if done
> in public by a group of people.
>
> May you burn like the flags you wish to destroy.
>
>
> .


+1

Just don't burn it in my bar. You'll be charged with multiple felonies.

WingNut Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Burned in a controlled, almost ceremonial setting
> by a VFW codger.
> Not in the street by some wild bearded goofball in
> pajama pants and sandals.
>
> ironical Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Ironic that the proper way to dispose of an
> > american flag is to burn it.

It's the difference between lighting somebody on fire in order to kill or desecrate them, as opposed to burning a deceased individual for cremation.

==================================================================================================
"And if any women or children get their legs torn off, or faces caved in, well, it's tough shit for them." -2LT. Bert Stiles, 505th, 339th (On Berlin Bombardier Mission, 1944).

The sad thing is, he actually NEEDED someone to explain that to him.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Seems like it would be more fun to skip buying the flag and simply burn the money.

Easier than setting fire to the money; wiping your ass with it.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

ThePackLeader Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WingNut Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Burned in a controlled, almost ceremonial
> setting
> > by a VFW codger.
> > Not in the street by some wild bearded goofball
> in
> > pajama pants and sandals.
> >
> > ironical Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Ironic that the proper way to dispose of an
> > > american flag is to burn it.
>
> It's the difference between lighting somebody on
> fire in order to kill or desecrate them, as
> opposed to burning a deceased individual for
> cremation.


A ban on flag burning would be very disrespectfull to all our fighting men and women who gave their lives in combat to protect our right to burn a flag if we so choose. I would never wish to burn an american flag but making flag burning illegal would be going way too far. Thank god our lawmakers see that now and flag burning that does not violate fire safety laws is still perfectly legal.

It is a non issue to horrify and shock the uninformed.

Each year there is less than a handful of actual flag burning reports. But people like the OP (Meade)jumping on the bandwagon and making it seem a everyday occurance - the mis-informed spreading mis-information.

I would venture to say the number of terrorists caught crossing the Canadian border into the US since 911 and the number of flag burning reports in the last year are roughly the same.

So let us concentrate on flag burning and not sealing the border with Canada!

Idiot.

How many men and women in the military do you think specify their goal as "protecting the freedom to burn a flag"?

I understand the argument in a theoretical sense, but is lighting a fire really speech? Do you think a symbolic measure banning the desecration of a flag is some march to totalitarianisn? Eat shit already.

Yes, Hitler banned flag burning, he also nationalized health care.


BRoss Wrote:
> A ban on flag burning would be very disrespectfull
> to all our fighting men and women who gave their
> lives in combat to protect our right to burn a
> flag if we so choose. I would never wish to burn
> an american flag but making flag burning illegal
> would be going way too far. Thank god our
> lawmakers see that now and flag burning that does
> not violate fire safety laws is still perfectly
> legal.

idontlikebeingrightaboutshitlikethisbutiam



Edited 21 time(s). Last edit at 5/31/1967 05:57AM by WingNut.

Last edit at 11/30/2015 01:37PM Last edit at 5/14/2015 03:52PM Last edit at 1/28/2014 05:57AM Last edit at 11/29/2015 01:10PM Last edit at 3/14/2011 11:52PM Last edit at 7/20/2012 04:07AM
Last edit at 6/29/2013 11:18PM Last edit at 3/19/2011 01:02PM Last edit at 3/26/2012 09:07PM

Most US flags are made by one company, Annin and Co, who have been doing it for 150 years or something like that. While it is privately held and does not release specific numbers, let us assume, for arguments sake, they make 10,000 flags a day.

Burning the flag Betsy Ross made would indeed be shocking. Burning one of 10,000 flags made in a day - not so shocking.

I hope you "get it" now

Maybe not make it illegal, but instead say.... you lose your citizenship and all the benefits due to you for 5 years. At the end of that period you can petition to be re-instated. If you don't like the flag and what it represents, then find somewhere else to live.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

If you don't like it go to Cuba blah blah blah.

Johnny Walker Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If you don't like it go to Cuba blah blah blah.


Exactly. They would be embraced with open arms right? Or would it be a 'grass is always greener on the other side' kind of moment? I will go with option 2. More people should spend some time abroad to see what they are truly taking for granted.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

flag desecration (includes burning) is illegal in many modern countries. check it out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_burning

unfortunately, it's a very limited list and has almost no references to countries in the middle east. wikipedia sucks.


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."

Many things are illegal in other countries that I wouldn't want to be illegal here.

Well, we could just celebrate the fact that we have freedoms others don't, or we could just keep finding things "we" don't like and make them all un-free(illegal)...you know, like burning flags, abortions, non-Caucasian people being allowed in public without fear of being asked for papers....you know, that sort of thing.

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.

fairfaxdude Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well, we could just celebrate the fact that we
> have freedoms others don't, or we could just keep
> finding things "we" don't like and make them all
> un-free(illegal)...you know, like burning flags,
> abortions, non-Caucasian people being allowed in
> public without fear of being asked for
> papers....you know, that sort of thing.


Sadly, the people here do not get yours or my point.

Let us say your grandfather loved sweet tarts. He had sweet tarts his entire life. He believed so much in sweet tarts he asked to be burried with them, which he was.

So a couple years later you see on the TV someone smashing sweet tarts with their boots saying how much they hate sweet tarts. Do you start whining like a baby? Of course not. Or maybe you do.

So to you the flag means liberty, justice, freedom and all things Sean Hannity. To about 8 others a year the flag is kindling. They are wrong, you are right. Just be happy with the fact that you are right and they are stupid and do not give them the attention they do not deserve.

Or you can put those 8 people on Fox News to scare old people.

Sadly, folks don't learn much about honor, integrity and love of your Country these days. That is why they have a hard time understanding why it is wrong. To them the flag is just that - a sweet tart - it holds as much significance as dog shit.

I am not sure why we even refer to Senators, Congressmen, Governors, etc as 'Honorable' anymore. Certainly most of them are much less so then the significance that is carried by burning the flag.

Hey, whatever - the folks burning the flags are idiots, no doubt.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

You guys are probably against flag burning also, but think a ban is unconstitutional.

My point would be this: speech is talk,print etc. Burning something is a totally differnt action. I think burning of a cross is illegal, but it may have been struck down by a higher court. Should they ban burning the Bible but not the Quran? Probably not, and I can comprehend that side of the argument.

In Maryland you are not allowed to buy any kind of fireworks, even sparklers. Pretty pussified law, especially if you consider your "freedom of expression" to be running around with sparklers. It's sure safer than burning a flag isn't it, with the much bigger flame?

The stupid and insulting notion that people keep pushing forward is that a ban on flag burning will lead to some severe erosion of your rights. Do these people take the same strict constituionalist few when it comes to gun ownership? Doubtful.

The scare tactics are yours.


Radiophile Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fairfaxdude Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Well, we could just celebrate the fact that we
> > have freedoms others don't, or we could just
> keep
> > finding things "we" don't like and make them
> all
> > un-free(illegal)...you know, like burning
> flags,
> > abortions, non-Caucasian people being allowed
> in
> > public without fear of being asked for
> > papers....you know, that sort of thing.
>
>
> Sadly, the people here do not get yours or my
> point.
>
> Let us say your grandfather loved sweet tarts. He
> had sweet tarts his entire life. He believed so
> much in sweet tarts he asked to be burried with
> them, which he was.
>
> So a couple years later you see on the TV someone
> smashing sweet tarts with their boots saying how
> much they hate sweet tarts. Do you start whining
> like a baby? Of course not. Or maybe you do.
>
> So to you the flag means liberty, justice, freedom
> and all things Sean Hannity. To about 8 others a
> year the flag is kindling. They are wrong, you
> are right. Just be happy with the fact that you
> are right and they are stupid and do not give them
> the attention they do not deserve.
>
> Or you can put those 8 people on Fox News to scare
> old people.

idontlikebeingrightaboutshitlikethisbutiam



Edited 21 time(s). Last edit at 5/31/1967 05:57AM by WingNut.

Last edit at 11/30/2015 01:37PM Last edit at 5/14/2015 03:52PM Last edit at 1/28/2014 05:57AM Last edit at 11/29/2015 01:10PM Last edit at 3/14/2011 11:52PM Last edit at 7/20/2012 04:07AM
Last edit at 6/29/2013 11:18PM Last edit at 3/19/2011 01:02PM Last edit at 3/26/2012 09:07PM

I dunno Reginald, but when sweet tarts are the same as dog shit, well, by-diggity-dog, I'm just gonna stop eatin candy.

Knowwhutimean?

Hey, whutevah.

(the rest of your post made so little sense, I got the beginnings of a headache.)

Hey, whutevah.

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.

Flag burning doesn't endanger others and really doesn't endanger the individual in question as much as fireworks. Plus, burning a flag is a political statement whereas lighting off fireworks is not. I realize it's a tradition at the 4th of July but that's still different. The flag is literally the symbol of a country. It is a definite statement to burn it, particularly if you are doing this at an actual protest as opposed to in your backyard with your friends and neighbors.

I'm not saying burning a flag is a good or bad thing, just trying to demonstrate the difference. I think fireworks laws are kind of stupid too, but so are a lot of people that use fireworks.

I'd guess that if a whole lotta flag burners burned off their faces and apendages doing it, it'd already be illegal.

Not the greatest analogy, fireworks vs flag burning.

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.

WingNut Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> The stupid and insulting notion that people keep
> pushing forward is that a ban on flag burning will
> lead to some severe erosion of your rights. Do
> these people take the same strict constituionalist
> few when it comes to gun ownership? Doubtful.
>
> The scare tactics are yours.
>


See that this is the point you do not get. The number of reproted cases of flag burning is usuallyt less than 10 a year.

Therfore it is a non-issue.

Why give these few people the attention they crave?

Does someone burning a flag (one of 10,000 made October 14, 2007 and not one of the 100s of thouseands made since then) so frighten you you want to ban it oir make a constitutional ammendment forbiding it?

Let us try it this way you doofus.

You have a flag. It is special to you. Great we are so happy for you and ytou should be happy with yourself.

Now see someone on Fox News burning a flag. You say to yourself "that is not MY flag, my flag is special,,, That is just a flag made October 14, 2007 - one of 10,000 made that day... It is not as special as MY flag. I treat MY flag special because it is special... Too bad his flag is not special to him".

Oh forget iut. We should have a constitutional ammendment banning something that happens less than a dozen times a year.

If I decide fireworks are a "political statement" why aren't they? Because someone decided? I make the same analogy of wearing burkas on airplanes- what would be the difference my "religion" was to wear Halloween maks into banks. how dare you question my faith!?!?! I know, it could get ridiculous, but if flag burning is a political statemnet, why couldn't fireworks be?

It could be an issue well left to the states. Staes could outlaw the "burning of items in prtest" including books,bras whatever. Makes sense.

The bug up my ass is the notion that if America did indeed amend the Constitution to ban flag burning that it would be some kind of path to a police state. I understand how asshole politicians would wrap themselves in the issue for brownie points, no question, and that may be who your beef is with.

Sparklers hardly endanger others. What if you burned the old Mike Pallone Chevy flag in Springfield? Wouldn't that be more dangerous than sparklers?

Johnny Walker Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Flag burning doesn't endanger others and really
> doesn't endanger the individual in question as
> much as fireworks. Plus, burning a flag is a
> political statement whereas lighting off fireworks
> is not. I realize it's a tradition at the 4th of
> July but that's still different. The flag is
> literally the symbol of a country. It is a
> definite statement to burn it, particularly if you
> are doing this at an actual protest as opposed to
> in your backyard with your friends and neighbors.
>
>
> I'm not saying burning a flag is a good or bad
> thing, just trying to demonstrate the difference.
> I think fireworks laws are kind of stupid too, but
> so are a lot of people that use fireworks.

idontlikebeingrightaboutshitlikethisbutiam



Edited 21 time(s). Last edit at 5/31/1967 05:57AM by WingNut.

Last edit at 11/30/2015 01:37PM Last edit at 5/14/2015 03:52PM Last edit at 1/28/2014 05:57AM Last edit at 11/29/2015 01:10PM Last edit at 3/14/2011 11:52PM Last edit at 7/20/2012 04:07AM
Last edit at 6/29/2013 11:18PM Last edit at 3/19/2011 01:02PM Last edit at 3/26/2012 09:07PM

There is really nothing 'political' about burning a US flag
while you are living on US soil. Go burn your flag in
Iraq and make your statement there.


.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Hey punk, FUCK YOU.

I'm not scared of shit and I think if you wanted to talk somewhere else other than online, you wouldn't be feeling too fucking cocky.

Read the post and understand the point.

You are posturing like a little pussy who wants a pat on the head from his social studies teacher. I'm sure you're a profile in courage.


Radiophile Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WingNut Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> > The stupid and insulting notion that people
> keep
> > pushing forward is that a ban on flag burning
> will
> > lead to some severe erosion of your rights. Do
> > these people take the same strict
> constituionalist
> > few when it comes to gun ownership? Doubtful.
> >
> > The scare tactics are yours.
> >
>
>
> See that this is the point you do not get. The
> number of reproted cases of flag burning is
> usuallyt less than 10 a year.
>
> Therfore it is a non-issue.
>
> Why give these few people the attention they
> crave?
>
> Does someone burning a flag (one of 10,000 made
> October 14, 2007 and not one of the 100s of
> thouseands made since then) so frighten you you
> want to ban it oir make a constitutional
> ammendment forbiding it?
>
> Let us try it this way you doofus.
>
> You have a flag. It is special to you. Great we
> are so happy for you and ytou should be happy with
> yourself.
>
> Now see someone on Fox News burning a flag. You
> say to yourself "that is not MY flag, my flag is
> special,,, That is just a flag made October 14,
> 2007 - one of 10,000 made that day... It is not as
> special as MY flag. I treat MY flag special
> because it is special... Too bad his flag is not
> special to him".
>
> Oh forget iut. We should have a constitutional
> ammendment banning something that happens less
> than a dozen times a year.

idontlikebeingrightaboutshitlikethisbutiam



Edited 21 time(s). Last edit at 5/31/1967 05:57AM by WingNut.

Last edit at 11/30/2015 01:37PM Last edit at 5/14/2015 03:52PM Last edit at 1/28/2014 05:57AM Last edit at 11/29/2015 01:10PM Last edit at 3/14/2011 11:52PM Last edit at 7/20/2012 04:07AM
Last edit at 6/29/2013 11:18PM Last edit at 3/19/2011 01:02PM Last edit at 3/26/2012 09:07PM

So nobody really cares that burning a flag is a very very very rare occurance?
We should treat it as if it is an everyday thing?

Trust me, you unpatroitic fools. Make it illegal or unconstitutional. Then you really will see alot more that 12 people a year burning flag.

But you would enjoy that because secretly you hate America and would love to see more flag burnings.

Me I am a liberal and knowing there are no more than 12 people burning a flag in protest is just fine with me. If there were 13 pewople a year doing it I would be really pissed. 12 is my limit.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/01/2010 06:30PM by Radiophile.

WingNut Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If I decide fireworks are a "political statement"
> why aren't they? Because someone decided? I make
> the same analogy of wearing burkas on airplanes-
> what would be the difference my "religion" was to
> wear Halloween maks into banks. how dare you
> question my faith!?!?! I know, it could get
> ridiculous, but if flag burning is a political
> statemnet, why couldn't fireworks be?

Ok that's just stupid. Apologies to Fruppie.

> It could be an issue well left to the states.
> Staes could outlaw the "burning of items in
> prtest" including books,bras whatever. Makes
> sense.

Of course, since "state laws" are just so much better than "federal laws". Notwithstanding the fact that a law is just a law, that's just pretty much stupid too.
>
> The bug up my ass is the notion that if America
> did indeed amend the Constitution to ban flag
> burning that it would be some kind of path to a
> police state.

Who said that? Or are you just inventing yet another timeworn slippery slope argument? since you're one for analogies, here's another slippery slope. Don't eat that dessert, since you KNOW eventually it will result in Federal mandates for dentures for every citizen by age 15. Mandatory In-Denture-tude. Why? It's the "slippery slope" argument of sugar, or course! Any more straw man slippery slopes you can invent for us?


I understand how asshole politicians
> would wrap themselves in the issue for brownie
> points, no question, and that may be who your beef
> is with.

You mean like every rightist's darlin, Sarah Palin? Who declares that the ONLY TRUE PATRIOTS are the ones at her rallies/speeches? You mean like her? Or TV douchebags who appropriate " one true way to HONOR and CHARACTER" to line their own pockets? Whoever could you possibly be speaking about?
>
> Sparklers hardly endanger others. What if you
> burned the old Mike Pallone Chevy flag in
> Springfield? Wouldn't that be more dangerous than
> sparklers?

Sparklers endanger toddlers. Toddlers with dumbass parents who give them to them and then walk back to the keg for thier 13th beer. Yay-lets party-It's July 4th...opps, Brendan's face is burnt off. Damn you, Brendan.

EDIT: fucking typos

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/01/2010 06:51PM by fairfaxdude.

Yeah, sparklers are dangerous.

Lets ban matches also.

And red baseball caps,
can't forget to ban red baseball caps!



.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

The burning of a flag is inherently a statement. Look at the discussion here and it's obvious. There is no need to come up with some tortured "Well I think "X" is a statement because of MY beliefs" logic to explain it. No one gathers around with family and friends to enjoy burnin' a nice flag on a holiday weekend. They don't set flags afire whenever someone makes a home run at the ballpark. People don't go to concerts to watch the awesome flag burning show during that wicked guitar solo. I can literally think of no reason, besides the one described before of the proper, respectful way to dispose of a flag, to burn a flag besides to make a statement.

So heres the result of this thread so far,

People against anti flag burning laws= educated inteligent patriotic.

People who think flag burning should be illegal= ignorant sheep who have little or no concept of what freedoms they enjoy every day. Not evil just stupid in most cases.

man... i want some sweet-tarts.


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."

Again, people on this board will tell us over and over again that flag burning is very very bad. I get that. I really do. But please please please people get my point

IT is VERTY VERY VERY RARE. Not worth you getting your panties all tied up in knot. If you paid every flag burner minimuw wage for their time burning flags, you could use a $10 bill and still have change, including a 5 dollar bill.

Flag burning does not happen much. NOT much at all. Do you get it?

Exponentially, more people get hit by lightning then burn flags

Each year we produce more sets of septuplets than we produce flag burners

You will see more Lanbroghinis on the beltway this year than you will see flag burners on Fox News

Sarah Palin's daughter will get pregnant more times in the next couple of years then there will be cases of flag burning.

It is rare! It Just Doesn't Happen People!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/02/2010 07:56AM by Radiophile.

Bright Happy Good Morning Radiophile!

Lemme try again.

It doesn't matter what your prejudices are about Sara Palin or Fox News.

It really doesn't matter how often something happens as a bellweather on rather it is good or bad. (You repeat that it happens 12x annually. Not sure how you get this, particularly since it is legal and there is probably litle accurate documentation on it)

Now it would yes, be a colossol waste of resources to amend the Constitution for the sole purposes, particularly since there would be showboating from both sides of the argument, righties who agree with censorship and are against a lot of little personal freedoms as well as lefties who are against gun and property ownership rights.

My stance is that, regardless of how often you say it happens, it is something very different from vocal or written speech. It can be banned, we'd still be a "free" country.


EDIT BELOW

Just for context and bipartisanship. Jim Moran supported anti-flag burning measures http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Jim_Moran We all can't be Glenn Beck-crazed kooks now, can we?

idontlikebeingrightaboutshitlikethisbutiam



Edited 21 time(s). Last edit at 5/31/1967 05:57AM by WingNut.

Last edit at 11/30/2015 01:37PM Last edit at 5/14/2015 03:52PM Last edit at 1/28/2014 05:57AM Last edit at 11/29/2015 01:10PM Last edit at 3/14/2011 11:52PM Last edit at 7/20/2012 04:07AM
Last edit at 6/29/2013 11:18PM Last edit at 3/19/2011 01:02PM Last edit at 3/26/2012 09:07PM



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/02/2010 08:21AM by WingNut.

The only time I see people burning the flag is on the news. It's either being done in some dirty street in a dirty oppressed third world country that hates America or by some equally dirty hippie with crazy hair outside some place like the IMF. Both of who's views I completely discount right off the bat anyway.

If you're in this country and you hate it that much, just STFU and move already. Go enjoy some other country's socialist military dictatorship.

__________________________________
That's not a ladybug, that's a cannapiller.

^^^^^^^^^^

AGREED!

BRoss Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So heres the result of this thread so far,
>
> People against anti flag burning laws= educated
> inteligent patriotic.
>
> People who think flag burning should be illegal=
> ignorant sheep who have little or no concept of
> what freedoms they enjoy every day. Not evil just
> stupid in most cases.


No, those for having a law against it have either a misunderstanding of what that would involve or have different priorities of what is important to this country.

It's a fact with Supreme Court precedent, that anti-flag-burning legislation is unconstitutional for free speech reasons. Therefore to make a law against it, you would need to amend the Constitution. This seems like an awful lot of trouble to go through for something that really doesn't happen that often and compared to most other Constitutional Amendments seems pretty petty.

as a non-citizen myself,I really do not agree to flag burning.Like Warhawk said if you don't like what you have ,then find a better spot for yourself and burn whatever you wanna burn out somewhere else ..I don't think they can do anything about flag burning like JW said since it is all about being the constitutional right..it is just disturbing ..

is it illegal to destroy or damage American money? I thought I read sth about it being illegal ..if so how is it any different than flag burning?

fngbngr Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> is it illegal to destroy or damage American money?
> I thought I read sth about it being illegal ..if
> so how is it any different than flag burning?


If it is, then we need to arrest all of Congress. They're doing more to burn though it and destroy it than anyone else on this planet.

__________________________________
That's not a ladybug, that's a cannapiller.

Currency is property of the Federal Gov., YOUR flag is not.
But I still think if it is done publically
on US soil, it should be considered a hate crime
and should warrant some type of jail time.


.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

WingNut Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bright Happy Good Morning Radiophile!
>
> Lemme try again.
>
> It doesn't matter what your prejudices are about
> Sara Palin or Fox News.

It is rare! I used 12 becuase I way overshot my estimate just so we did not argue over onesies-twosies.

> It really doesn't matter how often something
> happens as a bellweather on rather it is good or
> bad. (You repeat that it happens 12x annually. Not
> sure how you get this, particularly since it is
> legal and there is probably litle accurate
> documentation on it)

A Republicans said before Congress it has happened "17 times over the last 4 years!"
>
> Now it would yes, be a colossol waste of resources
> to amend the Constitution for the sole purposes,
> particularly since there would be showboating from
> both sides of the argument, righties who agree
> with censorship and are against a lot of little
> personal freedoms as well as lefties who are
> against gun and property ownership rights.

So the guy carrying a gun at the Discovery channel could not be a leftie cause he owned a gun. On behalf of all lefties, thank you.


>
> My stance is that, regardless of how often you say
> it happens, it is something very different from
> vocal or written speech. It can be banned, we'd
> still be a "free" country.

Why ban it? That will only bring more interest to it. Flag burning is stupid, so is having your best friend hold a target while you practice with your bow and arrow - neither of which in itself is illegal. But the moment you ban human target holders, people will hold targets. How many human target holders today? Probably 3 or 4. How many flag burners? 3 or 4.
>
>
> EDIT BELOW
>
> Just for context and bipartisanship. Jim Moran
> supported anti-flag burning measures
> http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Jim_Mor
> an We all can't be Glenn Beck-crazed kooks now,
> can we?


A few democrats supported spending a billion dollars to build a 20 foot fence along the southern border. Practically all the Republicans did. Everyone who voted on the billion dollar 20 foot high fence knew Wal-Mart sells a 22 foot high ladder.

Another example of Bipartisanship.

YEAs ---45
Alexander (R-TN)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Bennett (R-UT)
Bond (R-MO)
Brown (R-MA)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burr (R-NC)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hatch (R-UT)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johanns (R-NE)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Landrieu (D-LA)
LeMieux (R-FL)
Lugar (R-IN)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Nelson (D-NE)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Snowe (R-ME)
Tester (D-MT)
Thune (R-SD)
Vitter (R-LA)
Wicker (R-MS)
NAYs ---52
Akaka (D-HI)
Begich (D-AK)
Bennet (D-CO)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Burris (D-IL)
Byrd (D-WV)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Conrad (D-ND)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Franken (D-MN)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Hagan (D-NC)
Harkin (D-IA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kaufman (D-DE)
Kerry (D-MA)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Kohl (D-WI)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (ID-CT)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schumer (D-NY)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Specter (D-PA)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Udall (D-CO)
Udall (D-NM)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (D-VA)
Webb (D-VA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)
Not Voting - 3
Chambliss (R-GA)
Lincoln (D-AR)
McCaskill (D-MO)

Radiophile Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A Republicans said before Congress it has
> happened "17 times over the last 4 years!"

I think you made up this stat. Between 95 and 99 CRS reported 43 incidents.

Also, where in the bill was the height of the fence mentioned?

Radiophile wrote:
>"So the guy carrying a gun at the Discovery channel could not
be a leftie cause he owned a gun. On behalf of all lefties, thank you."

NO. This is called a tax and spend-hypocrite neo-communist Liberal nutbag
with a gun.

On behalf of all non-Liberal retards, you're welcome.



.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Gravis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> man... i want some sweet-tarts.


I am going home am going to stamp on some sweet-tarts just to upset you. I hope you cry like a little girl.

Radiophile Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So the guy carrying a gun at the Discovery channel
> could not be a leftie cause he owned a gun. On
> behalf of all lefties, thank you.


Law Enforcement says he didn't have a firearm. Facts just aren't your thing are they?

Capt. Obvious Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Radiophile Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > So the guy carrying a gun at the Discovery
> channel
> > could not be a leftie cause he owned a gun. On
> > behalf of all lefties, thank you.
>
>
> Law Enforcement says he didn't have a firearm.
> Facts just aren't your thing are they?


I guess so. I was listening to Chris Plant on WMAL who said he had a gun.

My bad.

Don't know who implied only righties carry guns. I said righties look for a strict view of the constitution about guns as lefites in Congress are more up to a strict view of the first amendment re flag burning.

And the border fence bill is relevant to what?

idontlikebeingrightaboutshitlikethisbutiam



Edited 21 time(s). Last edit at 5/31/1967 05:57AM by WingNut.

Last edit at 11/30/2015 01:37PM Last edit at 5/14/2015 03:52PM Last edit at 1/28/2014 05:57AM Last edit at 11/29/2015 01:10PM Last edit at 3/14/2011 11:52PM Last edit at 7/20/2012 04:07AM
Last edit at 6/29/2013 11:18PM Last edit at 3/19/2011 01:02PM Last edit at 3/26/2012 09:07PM

fngbngr Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> is it illegal to destroy or damage American money?
> I thought I read sth about it being illegal ..if
> so how is it any different than flag burning?

you can damage the money but you cant destroy it. it's not a matter of pride it's some economical dealy which i dont know/fully understand. go to the bureau of engraving and printing and they will tell you. however, it may just be because it costs more than a penny to make a penny.


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."

Gravis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> you can damage the money but you cant destroy it.
> it's not a matter of pride it's some economical
> dealy which i dont know/fully understand. go to
> the bureau of engraving and printing and they will
> tell you. however, it may just be because it
> costs more than a penny to make a penny.

It's illegal to render the bill unusable as valid tender/currency. You can draw a big ol' dick on you cash as long as it doesn't interfere with its ability to be used as money.

Presumably, this means you can't remove/hide/render illegible the serial numbers and other identifying marks that the business or government would use to verify that it is legitimate currency. The reasons could be as wide-spread as the cost associated with printing the money (as you mentioned) to preventing counterfeiting.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gravis Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > you can damage the money but you cant destroy
> it.
> > it's not a matter of pride it's some economical
> > dealy which i dont know/fully understand. go
> to
> > the bureau of engraving and printing and they
> will
> > tell you. however, it may just be because it
> > costs more than a penny to make a penny.
>
> It's illegal to render the bill unusable as valid
> tender/currency. You can draw a big ol' dick on
> you cash as long as it doesn't interfere with its
> ability to be used as money.
>
> Presumably, this means you can't
> remove/hide/render illegible the serial numbers
> and other identifying marks that the business or
> government would use to verify that it is
> legitimate currency. The reasons could be as
> wide-spread as the cost associated with printing
> the money (as you mentioned) to preventing
> counterfeiting.


That reminds me of a dollar bill I got as change once. It had all this info about some girl and what a gold digging whore she was, but she was a total slut and would fuck anything. It gave her name, number and all that. It was a 540 area code. I should have called.

__________________________________
That's not a ladybug, that's a cannapiller.

Whatever happened to that revolutionary internet site wheresgeorge.com? I always thought that the people writing on the bill were committing some kind of federal crime.

I looked at it back around 99 or so. Kind of clever, more silly though.

idontlikebeingrightaboutshitlikethisbutiam



Edited 21 time(s). Last edit at 5/31/1967 05:57AM by WingNut.

Last edit at 11/30/2015 01:37PM Last edit at 5/14/2015 03:52PM Last edit at 1/28/2014 05:57AM Last edit at 11/29/2015 01:10PM Last edit at 3/14/2011 11:52PM Last edit at 7/20/2012 04:07AM
Last edit at 6/29/2013 11:18PM Last edit at 3/19/2011 01:02PM Last edit at 3/26/2012 09:07PM

i got a jackson that had devil's horns and a pointy goatee on it. best 20 ever.


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."

On occasion, I've been known to come across some lionbucks.

I can't find a picture for it, but basically, you draw a >:3 over George Washington's face, turning him into a LION, JESUS CHRIST GET IN THE CAR!

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Flag Burning is for homosexuals. I suggest a new sport, Fag Burning.

Gonads & Strife Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'm against burning the flag, but I don't shit on
> those who do because it's their right here in the
> US to take, take, take and never sacrifice their
> freedoms for the good of others then burn the flag
> representing those freedoms. What goes around will
> eventually come around..
> KARMA IS A BITCH!!
>
>


I wonder what country these hooligans are upset at....Only thing we know at the moment, about this country that copied our flag, is that it has 20 states/stars.

Radiophile Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Capt. Obvious Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Radiophile Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > So the guy carrying a gun at the Discovery
> > channel
> > > could not be a leftie cause he owned a gun.
> On
> > > behalf of all lefties, thank you.
> >
> >
> > Law Enforcement says he didn't have a firearm.
> > Facts just aren't your thing are they?
>
>
> I guess so. I was listening to Chris Plant on WMAL
> who said he had a gun.
>
> My bad.


Mistake #1: Listening to WMAL

Mistake #2: Believing anyone on WMAL

You seem to be filled with stupidity. In a way, I feel sorry for you.

For one thing, I completely disagree with those who burn the flag. I believe they are unpatriotic, liberal hippie fucktards and I wouldn't shed a tear if they were to drop dead. It is a disgrace to this country. However, on the other hand, to make flag burning illegal I believe would be unconstitutional. Even if you find somebody's actions horrible and offensive doesn't mean they should be made illegal.

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
-Voltaire

Damn Hippies Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> For one thing, I completely disagree with those
> who burn the flag. I believe they are unpatriotic,
> liberal hippie fucktards and I wouldn't shed a
> tear if they were to drop dead. It is a disgrace
> to this country. However, on the other hand, to
> make flag burning illegal I believe would be
> unconstitutional. Even if you find somebody's
> actions horrible and offensive doesn't mean they
> should be made illegal.
>
> "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend
> to the death your right to say it."
> -Voltaire


I really like the quote at the end...amazing quote!

STFU Firrat!

anon user 'Damn hippies' wrote:
>"Even if you find somebody's actions horrible and offensive
> doesn't mean they should be made illegal."

Really? So let me get your thoughts on public urination.

It is a constitutional right, right?
Heck we can even start up a pissing in public nonprofit 'religious' group!


.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Troll@AOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> STFU Firrat!
>
> anon user 'Damn hippies' wrote:
> >"Even if you find somebody's actions horrible and
> offensive
> > doesn't mean they should be made illegal."
>
> Really? So let me get your thoughts on public
> urination.
>
> It is a constitutional right, right?
> Heck we can even start up a pissing in public
> nonprofit 'religious' group!
>
>
> .

BibleThumpingTroll@FU is more like it.

Look Firrat, if it's a Bible thumpin' you want,
I'll give it to you.

You'll just have to let me borrow your Bible.


.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Troll@AOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Look Firrat, if it's a Bible thumpin' you want,
> I'll give it to you.
>
> You'll just have to let me borrow your Bible.
>
>
> .

I'm sorry I do not want to see you use the Bible as a sexual release mechanism. Is that how you show your love to God?

Sorry, I would never use the Bible like you do.
Plus that hamster you got stuck up your ass is already saved.

.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Damn Hippies Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> For one thing, I completely disagree with those
> who burn the flag. I believe they are unpatriotic,
> liberal hippie fucktards and I wouldn't shed a
> tear if they were to drop dead. It is a disgrace
> to this country. However, on the other hand, to
> make flag burning illegal I believe would be
> unconstitutional. Even if you find somebody's
> actions horrible and offensive doesn't mean they
> should be made illegal.
>
> "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend
> to the death your right to say it."
> -Voltaire


I have burned me a few american flags just ta try an pizz people off, it generaly works mityfine.
Burn one of my flags where I can sees it an you has a serious problem on yer hands.

http://www.confederatestatesofamerica.org/
Attachments:

NC to DC Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.confederatestatesofamerica.org/

That site is HILARIOUS. Go read the section about the C.I.B.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

NC to DC Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Damn Hippies Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > For one thing, I completely disagree with those
> > who burn the flag. I believe they are
> unpatriotic,
> > liberal hippie fucktards and I wouldn't shed a
> > tear if they were to drop dead. It is a
> disgrace
> > to this country. However, on the other hand, to
> > make flag burning illegal I believe would be
> > unconstitutional. Even if you find somebody's
> > actions horrible and offensive doesn't mean
> they
> > should be made illegal.
> >
> > "I disapprove of what you say, but I will
> defend
> > to the death your right to say it."
> > -Voltaire
>
>
> I have burned me a few american flags just ta try
> an pizz people off, it generaly works mityfine.
> Burn one of my flags where I can sees it an you
> has a serious problem on yer hands.
>
> http://www.confederatestatesofamerica.org/


It looks like he's gonna do that barrel.

Capt. Obvious Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Radiophile Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Capt. Obvious Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Radiophile Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > So the guy carrying a gun at the Discovery
> > > channel
> > > > could not be a leftie cause he owned a gun.
> > On
> > > > behalf of all lefties, thank you.
> > >
> > >
> > > Law Enforcement says he didn't have a firearm.
>
> > > Facts just aren't your thing are they?
> >
> >
> > I guess so. I was listening to Chris Plant on
> WMAL
> > who said he had a gun.
> >
> > My bad.
>
>
> Mistake #1: Listening to WMAL
>
> Mistake #2: Believing anyone on WMAL
>
> You seem to be filled with stupidity. In a way, I
> feel sorry for you.


He had a starter pistol. Until the day after everyone thought he was armed with a gun.

Public urination actually would be illegal, I believe it would fall under "public indecency." It is NOT a constitutional right. So I am against it and it is illegal. The next time you try to start an argument please at least make sure its at least somewhat logical. Flag burning is wrong, but once you start taking away rights based on certain "principles" outside of the constitution, its a slippery slope my friend.

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
-Voltaire

@ btNNUTroll@AOl

Damn Hippies wrote:
>"I believe it would fall under "public indecency." It is
> NOT a constitutional right."

Burning a flag can fall under 'public indecency' AND reckless
endangerment of the public. Those are NOT a constitutional rights either.

Especially since forest fires have been started with as little as a
smoldering cigarette.

IF YOU WANT TO BURN A FLAG, JUST LEAVE THE COUNTRY. For GOOD.

.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Johnny Walker Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Capt. Obvious Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Radiophile Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Capt. Obvious Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Radiophile Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > So the guy carrying a gun at the
> Discovery
> > > > channel
> > > > > could not be a leftie cause he owned a
> gun.
> > > On
> > > > > behalf of all lefties, thank you.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Law Enforcement says he didn't have a
> firearm.
> >
> > > > Facts just aren't your thing are they?
> > >
> > >
> > > I guess so. I was listening to Chris Plant on
> > WMAL
> > > who said he had a gun.
> > >
> > > My bad.
> >
> >
> > Mistake #1: Listening to WMAL
> >
> > Mistake #2: Believing anyone on WMAL
> >
> > You seem to be filled with stupidity. In a way,
> I
> > feel sorry for you.
>
>
> He had a starter pistol. Until the day after
> everyone thought he was armed with a gun.

What day did the incident occur? What day did Radiophile attempt to make a point? Catching on yet?

BRoss Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How do we feel about burning the american flag in
> public now in 2010?
> Are there still some backwards thinking clueless
> citizens that are against it?


flag burning is gay

righty whiety Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> BRoss Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > How do we feel about burning the american flag
> in
> > public now in 2010?
> > Are there still some backwards thinking
> clueless
> > citizens that are against it?
>
>
> flag burning is gay


So are you Bonie

Burn a flag; burn the Quoran...

Buddy Watts Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Flag Burning is for homosexuals. I suggest a new
> sport, Fag Burning.


+1

Buddy Lite Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Buddy Watts Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Flag Burning is for homosexuals. I suggest a
> new
> > sport, Fag Burning.
>
>
> +1


Are you a goooooooood buddy?

ITRADE Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Burn a flag; burn the Quoran...


What if you burn a confererate flag?

Lets discuss this one some more. I am against it.

A group of middle aged men wearing Romney tee shirts were burning small American flags during the inauguration parade. I thought that was kind of sick but not really surprising behavior for Romney supporters.

BO supporter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A group of middle aged men wearing Romney tee
> shirts were burning small American flags during
> the inauguration parade. I thought that was kind
> of sick but not really surprising behavior for
> Romney supporters.


Proof please.

BRoss Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How do we feel about burning the american flag in
> public now in 2010?
> Are there still some backwards thinking clueless
> citizens that are against it?


3 to 4 years later and there are still some ignorant Americans that want to ban flag burning. That makes me angry after I lost my left eye defending Americans right to burn the flag.

time machine Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> BRoss Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > How do we feel about burning the american flag
> in
> > public now in 2010?
> > Are there still some backwards thinking
> clueless
> > citizens that are against it?
>
>
> 3 to 4 years later and there are still some
> ignorant Americans that want to ban flag burning.
> That makes me angry after I lost my left eye
> defending Americans right to burn the flag.

Bullshit.

BRoss Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So heres the result of this thread so far,
>
> People against anti flag burning laws= educated
> inteligent patriotic.
>
> People who think flag burning should be illegal=
> ignorant sheep who have little or no concept of
> what freedoms they enjoy every day. Not evil just
> stupid in most cases.


EOM

time machine Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> BRoss Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > How do we feel about burning the american flag
> in
> > public now in 2010?
> > Are there still some backwards thinking
> clueless
> > citizens that are against it?
>
>
> 3 to 4 years later and there are still some
> ignorant Americans that want to ban flag burning.
> That makes me angry after I lost my left eye
> defending Americans right to burn the flag.


Thank you for your service to our country.

BRoss Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So heres the result of this thread so far,
>
> People against anti flag burning laws= educated
> inteligent patriotic.
>
> People who think flag burning should be illegal=
> ignorant sheep who have little or no concept of
> what freedoms they enjoy every day. Not evil just
> stupid in most cases.


That^^^ sums it up!

I love burning the gay pride flag.

^^^^^ somewhere a gay leprechaun is crying.

Is the TEA party going to have a flag burning ceremony again this 4th of july weekend?