Re: Warriors coach Steve Kerr rages at GOP over Uvalde shooting, fails to mention that he successfully fought to get armed police out of schools [video]
Posted by:
Pc retardzz.
()
Date: May 25, 2022 07:55PM
B4P Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That is Not infringing.
> A background check may not cause denial of the
> gun, just allow the business owner to make a
> decision based on facts.
> In addition, your defining infringement that
> narrowly would prevent anyone of being checked
> on.
> In fact, the justices of the US Supreme Court
> state in the Heller decision that, "...nothing in
> our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on
> longstanding prohibitions on the possession of
> firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws
> forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive
> places such as schools and government buildings,
> or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on
> the commercial sale of arms.”
> So, no, we would not need to change the
> Constitution to run a background check to see if
> someone was a felon or had been found mentally
> unfit to own a gun.
> So, while your view is supported by a small number
> of people, I believe that the facts do not support
> your assertion.
The individuals have a right to a firearm. Convicted Felons lose constitutional rights of voting and firearms. Putting up roadblocks is infringing. Proving citizenship is the only reasonable impediment as it is with voting.