no, I'm just saying Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> see the problem here? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > same bone structure Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > They might have a point. If Meade lost all
> > that
> > > fat from his cheeks, his bone structure is of
> a
> > > Slavish Asian variety, pronounced cheekbones
> > > display that sought after hollow face look,
> > made
> > > popular by Johnny Depp, possibly another
> Meade
> > > clone
> >
> >
> > The conditional "If Meade lost all that fat
> from
> > his cheeks..."
> > is about as likely to come to pass as
> > "If Meade went back to college and got a degree
> in
> > Nuclear Engineering..."
> >
> > Meade's defining feature is his fat. It has
> always
> > been that way, and it will always be that way.
> If
> > you get your jollies imagining what Meade might
> > look like if he lost weight, that is your red
> > wagon. But at this point the rest of us have
> > earned the right to laugh at you for it.
>
>
> He has those fat cheeks, jowels?, whatever they're
> called, if, I say if, he lost that fat, cause
> that's what it is let's not pretend, he'd have a
> more angular featured, dare I say chiseled facial
> appearance.
We can see his face shape more lately
Attachments: