Are these the actions of an innocent man.

-
Attachments:

Nobody cares unless a Democrat was doing it, then you trump dummies would lose your mind. Hypocrites

i care

Everyone on here should post their financial records and tax returns for the world to see. Except fir Eesh everyone knows he filed bankruptcy to get out of his court ordered obligations.

Thats easy. The only people who want to see them have malicious intent just like the Russia hoax/coup. Trump has the right to keep his personal business private like every other citizen. He rightly understands that to defeat the swamp they must be fought, resisted and destroyed.

Knower of Stuff Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thats easy. The only people who want to see them
> have malicious intent just like the Russia
> hoax/coup. Trump has the right to keep his
> personal business private like every other
> citizen. He rightly understands that to defeat
> the swamp they must be fought, resisted and
> destroyed.


Kinda like how republicans would if it were a democrat in office, right? Difference is Trump has a confirmed history of committing fraud and tax evasion.

Because he's got something to hide. He's a walking talking something to hide. Trump hides something even when there is nothing to hide. It's a mix of stupidity and incompetence and entrenched criminality.

Not to mention what De Niro said. He's a bitch pretending hes in a mafia movie.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not to mention what De Niro said. He's a bitch
> pretending hes in a mafia movie.

Only retards and faggots give a fuck about what Hollywood losers say. You are both so that explains your post.

Trump is dying to be loved by any celebrity, which would probably explain Kanye and Kim going to the White House

Trump cares about Hollywood Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Trump is dying to be loved by any celebrity, which
> would probably explain Kanye and Kim going to the
> White House

I know right, Hollywood loves Trump.

Trump was asking a NYT reporter if it was too much to ask to get one positive story from his hometown paper. He enjoys the support he gets from his rabid racists but they don't mean much to him. What he really wants is to be embraced and cheered by the more dignified Americans of the left.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Trump was asking a NYT reporter if it was too much
> to ask to get one positive story from his hometown
> paper. He enjoys the support he gets from his
> rabid racists but they don't mean much to him.
> What he really wants is to be embraced and cheered
> by the more dignified Americans of the left.

Yeah, he is dying to hang out with retarded unemployable curb shitting refugees like you who live in their Mom’s basement. That’s dignified, LMFAO!!!

Good come back. Haven't heard that one before.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Good come back. Haven't heard that one before.

Since everyone tells you so much why don’t you make some changes in your life?

60 posts so far today under its registered name, and we all know there are at least 3 anonymous posts for every registered one. That makes a minimum of 240 posts in the last 23 hours.

Get out of the basement and get a job, dipshit.

Because the requests are unlawful, there's no law requiring him to do that go to hell and quit trying to write law here asshole

Fourth amendment, bill of rights:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Thing is, Trump is not a private citizen. He asked (begged) for his current job. It comes with certain responsibilities and other drawbacks, and part of that is a certain transparency when it comes to finances, especially when his claim to fame is "being really, really rich", and otherwise being some sort of financial genius.

But the whole idea of Trump wanting to "protect his privacy" is one of the stupidest arguments I have ever hear a Trumper make. Trump's whole life is a monument to the "look at me" form of narcissism that you see every time you pass the tabloid rack at the supermarket.

And that narcissism is exactly why Trump's lack of transparency is so telling. If Trump's taxes were even relatively clean, and supported his otherwise uncorroborated claims of great wealth, he would demand their publication. "Look at me, see how wealthy I am" Yet, he doesn't.

Tells you everything you need to know.

Suspicious conduct Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thing is, Trump is not a private citizen. He
> asked (begged) for his current job. It comes with
> certain responsibilities and other drawbacks, and
> part of that is a certain transparency when it
> comes to finances, especially when his claim to
> fame is "being really, really rich", and otherwise
> being some sort of financial genius.
>
> But the whole idea of Trump wanting to "protect
> his privacy" is one of the stupidest arguments I
> have ever hear a Trumper make. Trump's whole life
> is a monument to the "look at me" form of
> narcissism that you see every time you pass the
> tabloid rack at the supermarket.
>
> And that narcissism is exactly why Trump's lack of
> transparency is so telling. If Trump's taxes were
> even relatively clean, and supported his otherwise
> uncorroborated claims of great wealth, he would
> demand their publication. "Look at me, see how
> wealthy I am" Yet, he doesn't.
>
> Tells you everything you need to know.


The same transparency that we should be demanding of everyone severing in government, which would include democrats???

Xk9th Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fourth amendment, bill of rights:
>
> The right of the people to be secure in their
> persons, houses, papers, and effects, against
> unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
> violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon
> probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation,
> and particularly describing the place to be
> searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

axing fo a friend Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Suspicious conduct Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Thing is, Trump is not a private citizen. He
> > asked (begged) for his current job. It comes
> with
> > certain responsibilities and other drawbacks,
> and
> > part of that is a certain transparency when it
> > comes to finances, especially when his claim
> to
> > fame is "being really, really rich", and
> otherwise
> > being some sort of financial genius.
> >
> > But the whole idea of Trump wanting to "protect
> > his privacy" is one of the stupidest arguments
> I
> > have ever hear a Trumper make. Trump's whole
> life
> > is a monument to the "look at me" form of
> > narcissism that you see every time you pass the
> > tabloid rack at the supermarket.
> >
> > And that narcissism is exactly why Trump's lack
> of
> > transparency is so telling. If Trump's taxes
> were
> > even relatively clean, and supported his
> otherwise
> > uncorroborated claims of great wealth, he would
> > demand their publication. "Look at me, see how
> > wealthy I am" Yet, he doesn't.
> >
> > Tells you everything you need to know.
>
>
> The same transparency that we should be demanding
> of everyone severing in government, which would
> include democrats???

I would not have any problem with that, especially with elected federal officials. Of course, we all have a good idea what a GS-13 makes, and that GS-13 did not get his job by convincing his prospective employers that he had amasses great wealth based on his superior business acumen.

Bottom line is that Trump sold his supporters what is likely a load of total bullshit, and the Trumpers bought it hook, line and sinker. If Trump is as rich what he says, and his wealth was legally obtained, he is too narcissistic to not brag on it. Shit, he'd be bitching about how unfair it was if the MSM didn't put those beautiful financial documents on every front page around. But, he does not do that.

P. T. Barnum was right. Trump is proof.

Xk9th Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fourth amendment, bill of rights:
>
> The right of the people to be secure in their
> persons, houses, papers, and effects, against
> unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
> violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon
> probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation,
> and particularly describing the place to be
> searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Suspicious conduct Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> axing fo a friend Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Suspicious conduct Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Thing is, Trump is not a private citizen. He
> > > asked (begged) for his current job. It comes
> > with
> > > certain responsibilities and other drawbacks,
> > and
> > > part of that is a certain transparency when
> it
> > > comes to finances, especially when his claim
> > to
> > > fame is "being really, really rich", and
> > otherwise
> > > being some sort of financial genius.
> > >
> > > But the whole idea of Trump wanting to
> "protect
> > > his privacy" is one of the stupidest
> arguments
> > I
> > > have ever hear a Trumper make. Trump's whole
> > life
> > > is a monument to the "look at me" form of
> > > narcissism that you see every time you pass
> the
> > > tabloid rack at the supermarket.
> > >
> > > And that narcissism is exactly why Trump's
> lack
> > of
> > > transparency is so telling. If Trump's taxes
> > were
> > > even relatively clean, and supported his
> > otherwise
> > > uncorroborated claims of great wealth, he
> would
> > > demand their publication. "Look at me, see
> how
> > > wealthy I am" Yet, he doesn't.
> > >
> > > Tells you everything you need to know.
> >
> >
> > The same transparency that we should be
> demanding
> > of everyone severing in government, which would
> > include democrats???
>
> I would not have any problem with that, especially
> with elected federal officials. Of course, we all
> have a good idea what a GS-13 makes, and that
> GS-13 did not get his job by convincing his
> prospective employers that he had amasses great
> wealth based on his superior business acumen.
>
> Bottom line is that Trump sold his supporters what
> is likely a load of total bullshit, and the
> Trumpers bought it hook, line and sinker. If
> Trump is as rich what he says, and his wealth was
> legally obtained, he is too narcissistic to not
> brag on it. Shit, he'd be bitching about how
> unfair it was if the MSM didn't put those
> beautiful financial documents on every front page
> around. But, he does not do that.
>
> P. T. Barnum was right. Trump is proof.


Your complaining about Trump for the EXACT same thing you should be going after the democrats for sounds like you are still butthurt that hillary lost TWO FUCKINK YEARS AGO.

uh hu Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Suspicious conduct Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > axing fo a friend Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Suspicious conduct Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Thing is, Trump is not a private citizen.
> He
> > > > asked (begged) for his current job. It
> comes
> > > with
> > > > certain responsibilities and other
> drawbacks,
> > > and
> > > > part of that is a certain transparency when
> > it
> > > > comes to finances, especially when his
> claim
> > > to
> > > > fame is "being really, really rich", and
> > > otherwise
> > > > being some sort of financial genius.
> > > >
> > > > But the whole idea of Trump wanting to
> > "protect
> > > > his privacy" is one of the stupidest
> > arguments
> > > I
> > > > have ever hear a Trumper make. Trump's
> whole
> > > life
> > > > is a monument to the "look at me" form of
> > > > narcissism that you see every time you pass
> > the
> > > > tabloid rack at the supermarket.
> > > >
> > > > And that narcissism is exactly why Trump's
> > lack
> > > of
> > > > transparency is so telling. If Trump's
> taxes
> > > were
> > > > even relatively clean, and supported his
> > > otherwise
> > > > uncorroborated claims of great wealth, he
> > would
> > > > demand their publication. "Look at me, see
> > how
> > > > wealthy I am" Yet, he doesn't.
> > > >
> > > > Tells you everything you need to know.
> > >
> > >
> > > The same transparency that we should be
> > demanding
> > > of everyone severing in government, which
> would
> > > include democrats???
> >
> > I would not have any problem with that,
> especially
> > with elected federal officials. Of course, we
> all
> > have a good idea what a GS-13 makes, and that
> > GS-13 did not get his job by convincing his
> > prospective employers that he had amasses great
> > wealth based on his superior business acumen.
> >
> > Bottom line is that Trump sold his supporters
> what
> > is likely a load of total bullshit, and the
> > Trumpers bought it hook, line and sinker. If
> > Trump is as rich what he says, and his wealth
> was
> > legally obtained, he is too narcissistic to not
> > brag on it. Shit, he'd be bitching about how
> > unfair it was if the MSM didn't put those
> > beautiful financial documents on every front
> page
> > around. But, he does not do that.
> >
> > P. T. Barnum was right. Trump is proof.
>
>
> Your complaining about Trump for the EXACT same
> thing you should be going after the democrats for
> sounds like you are still butthurt that hillary
> lost TWO FUCKINK YEARS AGO.

You will note I agreed with the idea that Democrats should be required to be financially transparent. Including, for what it is worth, the Clintons, although the only people who still give a shit whether they live or die are Trumpers. I do not understand your anger.

You know, this constant deflection to Hillary is getting really pathetic. As you say, she lost TWO FUCKINK YEARS AGO.

Trump is hiding something, almost certainly something big. And most of you guys have figured it out, but you don't have the creative intelligence or the moral compass to adapt. So you blame a crooked has been for yours, and your idols', failings. Bodes well for our future.

OP and Democrats support anarchy and destruction of liberty. Civil rights is just another slogan to them.

If you want to know how much a federal employee makes, go to https://www.fedsdatacenter.com/federal-pay-rates/ and search for them. If they are federal LEO, DoD or intel, they won't be in there for reasons of security. But pretty much everyone else is.

Suspicious conduct Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> You will note I agreed with the idea that
> Democrats should be required to be financially
> transparent. Including, for what it is worth, the
> Clintons, although the only people who still give
> a shit whether they live or die are Trumpers. I
> do not understand your anger.
>
> You know, this constant deflection to Hillary is
> getting really pathetic. As you say, she lost TWO
> FUCKINK YEARS AGO.
>
> Trump is hiding something, almost certainly
> something big. And most of you guys have figured
> it out, but you don't have the creative
> intelligence or the moral compass to adapt. So
> you blame a crooked has been for yours, and your
> idols', failings. Bodes well for our future.


And, per usual, you are a fucking idiot who is wrong. The Mueller team saw all of Trump's tax records as part of their investigation. There is nothing there. The only reason the libfags want them is to embarrass Trump.

Trump doesn't have to play ball with the assholes investigating him. He doesn't give up his constitutional rights when he becomes president. No one blamed Hillary for trying to hide evidence and tell people to lie. It was the investigators and prosecutors who should have been held accountable to allowing her to get away with it.

And the reason Hillary was brought up was because you douche bags can't get over the fact that she's not president. Move on for gosh sakes. It's over. Barring something now unforeseen, Trump will be president for the next 5½ years. Are you pussies gonna whine for 8 straight years?

Phlhh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> OP and Democrats support anarchy and destruction
> of liberty. Civil rights is just another slogan to
> them.

Speaking of slogans, you just recited yours perfectly. Gold star. Those voices in your head (Limbaugh, Hannity) will be very proud.

It is interesting that the Trumpers won't defend Trump on this. Best excuse I have heard for Trump's concealment of his finances is that he is a "private person". Which is bullshit. First, Trump has the same desire for privacy that the Kardashians do. Second, he is too narcissistic to not take every opportunity to show the world how great he is, and in his world wealth is the only measure of greatness. If they supported his narrative, he would release them.

Trumps aversion to transparency is certainly understandable if he has been lying about his wealth all along. But the Trumpers don't have that excuse. And if the best response they can give to legitimate questions as to the qualifications of the man they wanted to be President specifically claimed to have is either a slogan (Phlhh, above) or by changing the subject to small time crooks who were lucky to get out of Arkansas ( uh hu, above), you have to wonder about their competency to exercise the basic functions of an American citizen.

Carpet bombing with truth bombs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Suspicious conduct Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > You will note I agreed with the idea that
> > Democrats should be required to be financially
> > transparent. Including, for what it is worth,
> the
> > Clintons, although the only people who still
> give
> > a shit whether they live or die are Trumpers.
> I
> > do not understand your anger.
> >
> > You know, this constant deflection to Hillary
> is
> > getting really pathetic. As you say, she lost
> TWO
> > FUCKINK YEARS AGO.
> >
> > Trump is hiding something, almost certainly
> > something big. And most of you guys have
> figured
> > it out, but you don't have the creative
> > intelligence or the moral compass to adapt. So
> > you blame a crooked has been for yours, and
> your
> > idols', failings. Bodes well for our future.
>
>
> And, per usual, you are a fucking idiot who is
> wrong. The Mueller team saw all of Trump's tax
> records as part of their investigation. There is
> nothing there. The only reason the libfags want
> them is to embarrass Trump.
>
> Trump doesn't have to play ball with the assholes
> investigating him. He doesn't give up his
> constitutional rights when he becomes president.
> No one blamed Hillary for trying to hide evidence
> and tell people to lie. It was the investigators
> and prosecutors who should have been held
> accountable to allowing her to get away with it.
>
> And the reason Hillary was brought up was because
> you douche bags can't get over the fact that she's
> not president. Move on for gosh sakes. It's
> over. Barring something now unforeseen, Trump
> will be president for the next 5½ years. Are you
> pussies gonna whine for 8 straight years?

That is hilarious.

First, the scope of Mueller's appointment did not reach his taxes. If Mueller found anything, he would have referred it to SDNY. Which, if I was Trump, would be of great concern.

Second, "nobody blamed" Hillary? Trump, and his millions of acolytes, have spent the last few years doing nothing but that. Don't blame Hillaryfor the fact your side is so inept that they can't successfully prosecute a woman so obviously guilty.

Trump is a classic con man. He wants you to buy something, in this case his credentials, without you looking at them. C'mon, Trumpers, you would not buy a used car without getting it checked out. Trust is earned. And with Trump, you are dealing with a man more than capable of fraudulent conduct.

Stop being sheep

Suspicious conduct Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Carpet bombing with truth bombs Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Suspicious conduct Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > > You will note I agreed with the idea that
> > > Democrats should be required to be
> financially
> > > transparent. Including, for what it is
> worth,
> > the
> > > Clintons, although the only people who still
> > give
> > > a shit whether they live or die are Trumpers.
>
> > I
> > > do not understand your anger.
> > >
> > > You know, this constant deflection to Hillary
> > is
> > > getting really pathetic. As you say, she lost
> > TWO
> > > FUCKINK YEARS AGO.
> > >
> > > Trump is hiding something, almost certainly
> > > something big. And most of you guys have
> > figured
> > > it out, but you don't have the creative
> > > intelligence or the moral compass to adapt.
> So
> > > you blame a crooked has been for yours, and
> > your
> > > idols', failings. Bodes well for our future.
> >
> >
> > And, per usual, you are a fucking idiot who is
> > wrong. The Mueller team saw all of Trump's tax
> > records as part of their investigation. There
> is
> > nothing there. The only reason the libfags
> want
> > them is to embarrass Trump.
> >
> > Trump doesn't have to play ball with the
> assholes
> > investigating him. He doesn't give up his
> > constitutional rights when he becomes president.
>
> > No one blamed Hillary for trying to hide
> evidence
> > and tell people to lie. It was the
> investigators
> > and prosecutors who should have been held
> > accountable to allowing her to get away with
> it.
> >
> > And the reason Hillary was brought up was
> because
> > you douche bags can't get over the fact that
> she's
> > not president. Move on for gosh sakes. It's
> > over. Barring something now unforeseen, Trump
> > will be president for the next 5½ years. Are
> you
> > pussies gonna whine for 8 straight years?
>
> That is hilarious.
>
> First, the scope of Mueller's appointment did not
> reach his taxes. If Mueller found anything, he
> would have referred it to SDNY. Which, if I was
> Trump, would be of great concern.
>
> Second, "nobody blamed" Hillary? Trump, and his
> millions of acolytes, have spent the last few
> years doing nothing but that. Don't blame
> Hillaryfor the fact your side is so inept that
> they can't successfully prosecute a woman so
> obviously guilty.
>
> Trump is a classic con man. He wants you to buy
> something, in this case his credentials, without
> you looking at them. C'mon, Trumpers, you would
> not buy a used car without getting it checked out.
> Trust is earned. And with Trump, you are dealing
> with a man more than capable of fraudulent
> conduct.
>
> Stop being sheep


Incorrect. Mueller 100% did look at Trump's taxes. He looked at all the financial records of Trump, Trump's charity and the records of Trump's family. That was within the purview of the initial collusion investigation.

You don't know anything and spew utter nonsense. Either you make it up as you go along or you get it from the morons on CNN.

Continue to embarrass yourself here. You've got nothing and are easily shown to the be uninformed idiot that you are.

If I was Trump, I would work overtime to give the dems nothing they want.

They still so mad. lol

Corrector  Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Suspicious conduct Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Carpet bombing with truth bombs Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Suspicious conduct Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > >
> > > > You will note I agreed with the idea that
> > > > Democrats should be required to be
> > financially
> > > > transparent. Including, for what it is
> > worth,
> > > the
> > > > Clintons, although the only people who
> still
> > > give
> > > > a shit whether they live or die are
> Trumpers.
> >
> > > I
> > > > do not understand your anger.
> > > >
> > > > You know, this constant deflection to
> Hillary
> > > is
> > > > getting really pathetic. As you say, she
> lost
> > > TWO
> > > > FUCKINK YEARS AGO.
> > > >
> > > > Trump is hiding something, almost certainly
> > > > something big. And most of you guys have
> > > figured
> > > > it out, but you don't have the creative
> > > > intelligence or the moral compass to adapt.
>
> > So
> > > > you blame a crooked has been for yours, and
> > > your
> > > > idols', failings. Bodes well for our
> future.
> > >
> > >
> > > And, per usual, you are a fucking idiot who
> is
> > > wrong. The Mueller team saw all of Trump's
> tax
> > > records as part of their investigation.
> There
> > is
> > > nothing there. The only reason the libfags
> > want
> > > them is to embarrass Trump.
> > >
> > > Trump doesn't have to play ball with the
> > assholes
> > > investigating him. He doesn't give up his
> > > constitutional rights when he becomes
> president.
> >
> > > No one blamed Hillary for trying to hide
> > evidence
> > > and tell people to lie. It was the
> > investigators
> > > and prosecutors who should have been held
> > > accountable to allowing her to get away with
> > it.
> > >
> > > And the reason Hillary was brought up was
> > because
> > > you douche bags can't get over the fact that
> > she's
> > > not president. Move on for gosh sakes. It's
> > > over. Barring something now unforeseen,
> Trump
> > > will be president for the next 5½ years.
> Are
> > you
> > > pussies gonna whine for 8 straight years?
> >
> > That is hilarious.
> >
> > First, the scope of Mueller's appointment did
> not
> > reach his taxes. If Mueller found anything, he
> > would have referred it to SDNY. Which, if I
> was
> > Trump, would be of great concern.
> >
> > Second, "nobody blamed" Hillary? Trump, and
> his
> > millions of acolytes, have spent the last few
> > years doing nothing but that. Don't blame
> > Hillaryfor the fact your side is so inept that
> > they can't successfully prosecute a woman so
> > obviously guilty.
> >
> > Trump is a classic con man. He wants you to
> buy
> > something, in this case his credentials,
> without
> > you looking at them. C'mon, Trumpers, you
> would
> > not buy a used car without getting it checked
> out.
> > Trust is earned. And with Trump, you are
> dealing
> > with a man more than capable of fraudulent
> > conduct.
> >
> > Stop being sheep
>
>
> Incorrect. Mueller 100% did look at Trump's
> taxes. He looked at all the financial records of
> Trump, Trump's charity and the records of Trump's
> family. That was within the purview of the
> initial collusion investigation.
>
> You don't know anything and spew utter nonsense.
> Either you make it up as you go along or you get
> it from the morons on CNN.
>
> Continue to embarrass yourself here. You've got
> nothing and are easily shown to the be uninformed
> idiot that you are.

Whatever. Thing is, they will come out, sooner or later. Things like that always do.

Since appeals to patriotism, honesty and common decency don't work, maybe Trump would find this appealing. If his taxes are clean, he will get to whoop it up in the face of all the libs who doubted his brilliance (not to mention basic integrity) by releasing them. We all know that the character trait that most clearly defines Trump, other than narcissism, is vindictiveness towards those who dare cross him. This would be a perfect opportunity, yet he declines it. Tells you everything you need to know