FFU missed this: Arizona cop shoot UN-ARMED and innocent boy merely for not surrendering in the surrender position he asked for.
FFU seems to have missed this story.
Arizona officer gives a mere boy "confusing commands" of how to surrender himself (who did noting illegal and was never a danger), AND SHOOTS THE BOY FOR NOT FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS.
https://michaelsavage.com/?s=daniel+shaver
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mesa-police-shooting-daniel-shaver-seen-crawling-begging-in-disturbing-video/
The WHOLE VIDEO is online. The family ghosted and suing. Even the sister liked this dead boy. The boy literally was crying try to follow confusing orders asking officer how to better follow the confusing orders.
the right of officers to give a suspect commands is itself a recent change to USA law. for example: and officer could not simply command persons to not talk or be on a scene and then arrest them for a crime of not "following orders", such orders are "mandamus" and not in the law: meaning officers had had no right to "create law on the spot then arrest or harm" on the same illegal command.
these "extraordinary commands" are new in law: and there was resistance and law suits that officers have no extra-ordinary legal power to "make new law as they see fit and prosecute those who don't follow them" on the spot. (in corrupt areas, esp democrat areas, defendants ALWAYS loose in court, of course)
Fairfax county democrats are consider this guy for school officer, yes? this is what you get if your teacher doesn't like your politics