Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: June 07, 2017 03:10PM
We've reached the point now where it's time to speculate on where and how the arrest of Donald Trump will occur.
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
7HVLN
()
Date: June 07, 2017 03:17PM
What was that Gerry? Didn't hear you...
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
What would your mom say
()
Date: June 07, 2017 03:26PM
7HVLN Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What was that Gerry? Didn't hear you...
Who in their right mind looks up animal "porn"
-------------------------------------------------------
> What was that Gerry? Didn't hear you...
Who in their right mind looks up animal "porn"
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
gerry rapes underage piglets
()
Date: June 07, 2017 03:30PM
Perp walk for the pedo perv
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
Darnielleay Myckalea Jones
()
Date: June 07, 2017 03:32PM
What would your mom say Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 7HVLN Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > What was that Gerry? Didn't hear you...
>
>
> Who in their right mind looks up animal "porn"
Your Mom has a BBC in her mouth and can't say anything.
-------------------------------------------------------
> 7HVLN Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > What was that Gerry? Didn't hear you...
>
>
> Who in their right mind looks up animal "porn"
Your Mom has a BBC in her mouth and can't say anything.
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
Hknj
()
Date: June 07, 2017 03:34PM
Darnielleay Myckalea Jones Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What would your mom say Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 7HVLN Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > What was that Gerry? Didn't hear you...
> >
> >
> > Who in their right mind looks up animal "porn"
>
>
> Your Mom has a BBC in her mouth and can't say
> anything.
Don't tell dad
Mom never gives him head
-------------------------------------------------------
> What would your mom say Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 7HVLN Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > What was that Gerry? Didn't hear you...
> >
> >
> > Who in their right mind looks up animal "porn"
>
>
> Your Mom has a BBC in her mouth and can't say
> anything.
Don't tell dad
Mom never gives him head
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
#fakenews
()
Date: June 07, 2017 03:45PM
"I explained that we had briefed the leadership of Congress on exactly which individuals we were investigating and that we had told those Congressional leaders that we were not personally investigating President Trump. I reminded him I had previously told him that." - Jim Comey
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
And......
()
Date: June 07, 2017 03:46PM
#fakenews Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "I explained that we had briefed the leadership of
> Congress on exactly which individuals we were
> investigating and that we had told those
> Congressional leaders that we were not personally
> investigating President Trump. I reminded him I
> had previously told him that." - Jim Comey
What's your point?
-------------------------------------------------------
> "I explained that we had briefed the leadership of
> Congress on exactly which individuals we were
> investigating and that we had told those
> Congressional leaders that we were not personally
> investigating President Trump. I reminded him I
> had previously told him that." - Jim Comey
What's your point?
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: June 07, 2017 03:49PM
There is no point. He's a tard.
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
#fakenews
()
Date: June 07, 2017 03:54PM
Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There is no point. He's a tard.
Why so mad? Is it because I expose your ignorance about how our government works?
-------------------------------------------------------
> There is no point. He's a tard.
Why so mad? Is it because I expose your ignorance about how our government works?
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
#fakenews
()
Date: June 07, 2017 03:56PM
And...... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> #fakenews Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > "I explained that we had briefed the leadership
> of
> > Congress on exactly which individuals we were
> > investigating and that we had told those
> > Congressional leaders that we were not
> personally
> > investigating President Trump. I reminded him I
> > had previously told him that." - Jim Comey
>
>
> What's your point?
It's kind of hard to arrest someone who isn't even under investigation. Unless, of course, the officer witnesses the crime as it happens. But, that isn't the case here.
That's the point. It's pretty obvious, even for a simpleton.
-------------------------------------------------------
> #fakenews Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > "I explained that we had briefed the leadership
> of
> > Congress on exactly which individuals we were
> > investigating and that we had told those
> > Congressional leaders that we were not
> personally
> > investigating President Trump. I reminded him I
> > had previously told him that." - Jim Comey
>
>
> What's your point?
It's kind of hard to arrest someone who isn't even under investigation. Unless, of course, the officer witnesses the crime as it happens. But, that isn't the case here.
That's the point. It's pretty obvious, even for a simpleton.
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
skkff
()
Date: June 07, 2017 04:00PM
#fakenews Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And...... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > #fakenews Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > "I explained that we had briefed the
> leadership
> > of
> > > Congress on exactly which individuals we were
> > > investigating and that we had told those
> > > Congressional leaders that we were not
> > personally
> > > investigating President Trump. I reminded him
> I
> > > had previously told him that." - Jim Comey
> >
> >
> > What's your point?
>
>
> It's kind of hard to arrest someone who isn't even
> under investigation. Unless, of course, the
> officer witnesses the crime as it happens. But,
> that isn't the case here.
>
> That's the point. It's pretty obvious, even for a
> simpleton.
How many of these testifying would even made it testify under the clintons?
And whoever survivors made it to hearing woild he very scared and watched what they said.
-------------------------------------------------------
> And...... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > #fakenews Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > "I explained that we had briefed the
> leadership
> > of
> > > Congress on exactly which individuals we were
> > > investigating and that we had told those
> > > Congressional leaders that we were not
> > personally
> > > investigating President Trump. I reminded him
> I
> > > had previously told him that." - Jim Comey
> >
> >
> > What's your point?
>
>
> It's kind of hard to arrest someone who isn't even
> under investigation. Unless, of course, the
> officer witnesses the crime as it happens. But,
> that isn't the case here.
>
> That's the point. It's pretty obvious, even for a
> simpleton.
How many of these testifying would even made it testify under the clintons?
And whoever survivors made it to hearing woild he very scared and watched what they said.
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
They didn't have anyone killed
()
Date: June 07, 2017 04:04PM
skkff Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> #fakenews Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > And...... Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > #fakenews Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > "I explained that we had briefed the
> > leadership
> > > of
> > > > Congress on exactly which individuals we
> were
> > > > investigating and that we had told those
> > > > Congressional leaders that we were not
> > > personally
> > > > investigating President Trump. I reminded
> him
> > I
> > > > had previously told him that." - Jim Comey
> > >
> > >
> > > What's your point?
> >
> >
> > It's kind of hard to arrest someone who isn't
> even
> > under investigation. Unless, of course, the
> > officer witnesses the crime as it happens.
> But,
> > that isn't the case here.
> >
> > That's the point. It's pretty obvious, even for
> a
> > simpleton.
>
> How many of these testifying would even made it
> testify under the clintons?
> And whoever survivors made it to hearing woild he
> very scared and watched what they said.
Why?
-------------------------------------------------------
> #fakenews Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > And...... Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > #fakenews Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > "I explained that we had briefed the
> > leadership
> > > of
> > > > Congress on exactly which individuals we
> were
> > > > investigating and that we had told those
> > > > Congressional leaders that we were not
> > > personally
> > > > investigating President Trump. I reminded
> him
> > I
> > > > had previously told him that." - Jim Comey
> > >
> > >
> > > What's your point?
> >
> >
> > It's kind of hard to arrest someone who isn't
> even
> > under investigation. Unless, of course, the
> > officer witnesses the crime as it happens.
> But,
> > that isn't the case here.
> >
> > That's the point. It's pretty obvious, even for
> a
> > simpleton.
>
> How many of these testifying would even made it
> testify under the clintons?
> And whoever survivors made it to hearing woild he
> very scared and watched what they said.
Why?
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
Not likely but
()
Date: June 07, 2017 04:07PM
#fakenews Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And...... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > #fakenews Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > "I explained that we had briefed the
> leadership
> > of
> > > Congress on exactly which individuals we were
> > > investigating and that we had told those
> > > Congressional leaders that we were not
> > personally
> > > investigating President Trump. I reminded him
> I
> > > had previously told him that." - Jim Comey
> >
> >
> > What's your point?
>
>
> It's kind of hard to arrest someone who isn't even
> under investigation. Unless, of course, the
> officer witnesses the crime as it happens. But,
> that isn't the case here.
>
> That's the point. It's pretty obvious, even for a
> simpleton.
And a case could be made that Trump tried to interfere with an investagation that was about Flynn not him
-------------------------------------------------------
> And...... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > #fakenews Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > "I explained that we had briefed the
> leadership
> > of
> > > Congress on exactly which individuals we were
> > > investigating and that we had told those
> > > Congressional leaders that we were not
> > personally
> > > investigating President Trump. I reminded him
> I
> > > had previously told him that." - Jim Comey
> >
> >
> > What's your point?
>
>
> It's kind of hard to arrest someone who isn't even
> under investigation. Unless, of course, the
> officer witnesses the crime as it happens. But,
> that isn't the case here.
>
> That's the point. It's pretty obvious, even for a
> simpleton.
And a case could be made that Trump tried to interfere with an investagation that was about Flynn not him
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: June 07, 2017 04:31PM
Now that Trump is going to prison. What are we going to do with his supporters? What will be their punishment?
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
nexpm
()
Date: June 07, 2017 04:32PM
To answer the question: No. Trump will serve out his entire term and probably be re-elected. You don't seem to understand that watching MSNBC or CNN is not helping you get a grip on reality. The world outside of those little bubbles is much different than you realize. Stop getting your hopes up.
Clue: if Comey had anything important to say we would already know it. End of story.
Clue: if Comey had anything important to say we would already know it. End of story.
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: June 07, 2017 04:33PM
^^^^ This is exactly why we need to round them up and deal with them sternly.
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
What people care about
()
Date: June 07, 2017 04:37PM
nexpm Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> To answer the question: No. Trump will serve out
> his entire term and probably be re-elected. You
> don't seem to understand that watching MSNBC or
> CNN is not helping you get a grip on reality. The
> world outside of those little bubbles is much
> different than you realize. Stop getting your
> hopes up.
>
> Clue: if Comey had anything important to say we
> would already know it. End of story.
How is that jobs bill coming?
-------------------------------------------------------
> To answer the question: No. Trump will serve out
> his entire term and probably be re-elected. You
> don't seem to understand that watching MSNBC or
> CNN is not helping you get a grip on reality. The
> world outside of those little bubbles is much
> different than you realize. Stop getting your
> hopes up.
>
> Clue: if Comey had anything important to say we
> would already know it. End of story.
How is that jobs bill coming?
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
Silly Lil Pajama Boy
()
Date: June 07, 2017 04:39PM
no....he's out of office
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
Fact Checker1
()
Date: June 07, 2017 04:40PM
Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Now that Trump is going to prison. What are we
> going to do with his supporters? What will be
> their punishment?
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Now that Trump is going to prison. What are we
> going to do with his supporters? What will be
> their punishment?
Attachments:
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
P C retardz
()
Date: June 07, 2017 04:43PM
.
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
Close thread....
()
Date: June 07, 2017 04:46PM
P C retardz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> .
#winning #MAGA
-------------------------------------------------------
> .
#winning #MAGA
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
GoatStrike
()
Date: June 07, 2017 04:54PM
Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We've reached the point now where it's time to
> speculate on where and how the arrest of Donald
> Trump will occur.
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We've reached the point now where it's time to
> speculate on where and how the arrest of Donald
> Trump will occur.
Attachments:
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
#fakenews
()
Date: June 07, 2017 05:19PM
Not likely but Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> #fakenews Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > And...... Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > #fakenews Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > "I explained that we had briefed the
> > leadership
> > > of
> > > > Congress on exactly which individuals we
> were
> > > > investigating and that we had told those
> > > > Congressional leaders that we were not
> > > personally
> > > > investigating President Trump. I reminded
> him
> > I
> > > > had previously told him that." - Jim Comey
> > >
> > >
> > > What's your point?
> >
> >
> > It's kind of hard to arrest someone who isn't
> even
> > under investigation. Unless, of course, the
> > officer witnesses the crime as it happens.
> But,
> > that isn't the case here.
> >
> > That's the point. It's pretty obvious, even for
> a
> > simpleton.
>
>
> And a case could be made that Trump tried to
> interfere with an investagation that was about
> Flynn not him
Not really. Even in Comey's testimony he doesn't even remotely allege that. For anyone to attempt to make that case, they'd be grasping at straws that aren't there.
And let's say you were attempting to make that case, wouldn't you open it pretty quickly? Why wait at least 6 weeks? Your alleged "obstruction" occurred on February 14th according to Comey. Also, according to Comey, he briefed Congress that DOJ was not personally investigating President Trump the week of March 20th.
So, you've got this alleged "obstruction" taking place on February 14th with the freaking FBI Director as the main and only witness to the "crime." There are only two questions that need to be proven in order to determine if obstruction took place:
1) Did the President make the statement to Comey?
2) Does that constitute obstruction of justice?
Let's look at question 1. There doesn't seem to be much dispute that the statement was made, so we move onto question 2.
Now, Comey is a brilliant attorney having served as DAG after a series of high profile positions at DOJ. He then went on to serve as general counsel to one of the largest companies in the US. You're telling me that his brilliant legal mind couldn't come to a conclusion to answer question 2? Or you're telling me that he didn't hand the decision over to another attorney at DOJ if he thought there might be obstruction there? Yeah. I'm not buying it.
Conclusion: Not even Jim Comey thinks obstructed the investigation.
-------------------------------------------------------
> #fakenews Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > And...... Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > #fakenews Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > "I explained that we had briefed the
> > leadership
> > > of
> > > > Congress on exactly which individuals we
> were
> > > > investigating and that we had told those
> > > > Congressional leaders that we were not
> > > personally
> > > > investigating President Trump. I reminded
> him
> > I
> > > > had previously told him that." - Jim Comey
> > >
> > >
> > > What's your point?
> >
> >
> > It's kind of hard to arrest someone who isn't
> even
> > under investigation. Unless, of course, the
> > officer witnesses the crime as it happens.
> But,
> > that isn't the case here.
> >
> > That's the point. It's pretty obvious, even for
> a
> > simpleton.
>
>
> And a case could be made that Trump tried to
> interfere with an investagation that was about
> Flynn not him
Not really. Even in Comey's testimony he doesn't even remotely allege that. For anyone to attempt to make that case, they'd be grasping at straws that aren't there.
And let's say you were attempting to make that case, wouldn't you open it pretty quickly? Why wait at least 6 weeks? Your alleged "obstruction" occurred on February 14th according to Comey. Also, according to Comey, he briefed Congress that DOJ was not personally investigating President Trump the week of March 20th.
So, you've got this alleged "obstruction" taking place on February 14th with the freaking FBI Director as the main and only witness to the "crime." There are only two questions that need to be proven in order to determine if obstruction took place:
1) Did the President make the statement to Comey?
2) Does that constitute obstruction of justice?
Let's look at question 1. There doesn't seem to be much dispute that the statement was made, so we move onto question 2.
Now, Comey is a brilliant attorney having served as DAG after a series of high profile positions at DOJ. He then went on to serve as general counsel to one of the largest companies in the US. You're telling me that his brilliant legal mind couldn't come to a conclusion to answer question 2? Or you're telling me that he didn't hand the decision over to another attorney at DOJ if he thought there might be obstruction there? Yeah. I'm not buying it.
Conclusion: Not even Jim Comey thinks obstructed the investigation.
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: June 07, 2017 05:25PM
Comey isn't the only one. Attacking Comey ain't gonna work. Face it, Trump is too big of s loser. Deal with it.
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
#fakenews
()
Date: June 07, 2017 05:28PM
Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Comey isn't the only one. Attacking Comey ain't
> gonna work. Face it, Trump is too big of s loser.
> Deal with it.
Comey is the only one to have witnessed the alleged "obstruction" of justice.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Comey isn't the only one. Attacking Comey ain't
> gonna work. Face it, Trump is too big of s loser.
> Deal with it.
Comey is the only one to have witnessed the alleged "obstruction" of justice.
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
Dgjh
()
Date: June 07, 2017 05:46PM
#fakenews Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not likely but Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > #fakenews Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > And...... Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > #fakenews Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > "I explained that we had briefed the
> > > leadership
> > > > of
> > > > > Congress on exactly which individuals we
> > were
> > > > > investigating and that we had told those
> > > > > Congressional leaders that we were not
> > > > personally
> > > > > investigating President Trump. I reminded
> > him
> > > I
> > > > > had previously told him that." - Jim
> Comey
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What's your point?
> > >
> > >
> > > It's kind of hard to arrest someone who isn't
> > even
> > > under investigation. Unless, of course, the
> > > officer witnesses the crime as it happens.
> > But,
> > > that isn't the case here.
> > >
> > > That's the point. It's pretty obvious, even
> for
> > a
> > > simpleton.
> >
> >
> > And a case could be made that Trump tried to
> > interfere with an investagation that was about
> > Flynn not him
>
> Not really. Even in Comey's testimony he doesn't
> even remotely allege that. For anyone to attempt
> to make that case, they'd be grasping at straws
> that aren't there.
>
> And let's say you were attempting to make that
> case, wouldn't you open it pretty quickly? Why
> wait at least 6 weeks? Your alleged "obstruction"
> occurred on February 14th according to Comey.
> Also, according to Comey, he briefed Congress that
> DOJ was not personally investigating President
> Trump the week of March 20th.
>
> So, you've got this alleged "obstruction" taking
> place on February 14th with the freaking FBI
> Director as the main and only witness to the
> "crime." There are only two questions that need
> to be proven in order to determine if obstruction
> took place:
> 1) Did the President make the statement to Comey?
> 2) Does that constitute obstruction of justice?
>
> Let's look at question 1. There doesn't seem to
> be much dispute that the statement was made, so we
> move onto question 2.
>
> Now, Comey is a brilliant attorney having served
> as DAG after a series of high profile positions at
> DOJ. He then went on to serve as general counsel
> to one of the largest companies in the US. You're
> telling me that his brilliant legal mind couldn't
> come to a conclusion to answer question 2? Or
> you're telling me that he didn't hand the decision
> over to another attorney at DOJ if he thought
> there might be obstruction there? Yeah. I'm not
> buying it.
>
> Conclusion: Not even Jim Comey thinks obstructed
> the investigation.
Good job sir
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not likely but Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > #fakenews Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > And...... Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > #fakenews Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > "I explained that we had briefed the
> > > leadership
> > > > of
> > > > > Congress on exactly which individuals we
> > were
> > > > > investigating and that we had told those
> > > > > Congressional leaders that we were not
> > > > personally
> > > > > investigating President Trump. I reminded
> > him
> > > I
> > > > > had previously told him that." - Jim
> Comey
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What's your point?
> > >
> > >
> > > It's kind of hard to arrest someone who isn't
> > even
> > > under investigation. Unless, of course, the
> > > officer witnesses the crime as it happens.
> > But,
> > > that isn't the case here.
> > >
> > > That's the point. It's pretty obvious, even
> for
> > a
> > > simpleton.
> >
> >
> > And a case could be made that Trump tried to
> > interfere with an investagation that was about
> > Flynn not him
>
> Not really. Even in Comey's testimony he doesn't
> even remotely allege that. For anyone to attempt
> to make that case, they'd be grasping at straws
> that aren't there.
>
> And let's say you were attempting to make that
> case, wouldn't you open it pretty quickly? Why
> wait at least 6 weeks? Your alleged "obstruction"
> occurred on February 14th according to Comey.
> Also, according to Comey, he briefed Congress that
> DOJ was not personally investigating President
> Trump the week of March 20th.
>
> So, you've got this alleged "obstruction" taking
> place on February 14th with the freaking FBI
> Director as the main and only witness to the
> "crime." There are only two questions that need
> to be proven in order to determine if obstruction
> took place:
> 1) Did the President make the statement to Comey?
> 2) Does that constitute obstruction of justice?
>
> Let's look at question 1. There doesn't seem to
> be much dispute that the statement was made, so we
> move onto question 2.
>
> Now, Comey is a brilliant attorney having served
> as DAG after a series of high profile positions at
> DOJ. He then went on to serve as general counsel
> to one of the largest companies in the US. You're
> telling me that his brilliant legal mind couldn't
> come to a conclusion to answer question 2? Or
> you're telling me that he didn't hand the decision
> over to another attorney at DOJ if he thought
> there might be obstruction there? Yeah. I'm not
> buying it.
>
> Conclusion: Not even Jim Comey thinks obstructed
> the investigation.
Good job sir
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
No sure don't
()
Date: June 07, 2017 06:00PM
haha after reading the Comey transcript...
not a chance in hell
it was a cute coup attempt libs but the narrative is almost completely debunked at this point
not a chance in hell
it was a cute coup attempt libs but the narrative is almost completely debunked at this point
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
Poor Gerry
()
Date: June 07, 2017 06:05PM
All you have is your hatred to cling to.
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
trumpitality
()
Date: June 07, 2017 06:12PM
Don't worry Libs, you still have the fake Russia stuff to be proven wrong with.
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
comeymemos
()
Date: June 07, 2017 08:53PM
I hope someone asks Comey for copies of his contemporaneous memo's of his conversations and thoughts about the Clinton email server investigation.
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
xxuvp
()
Date: June 07, 2017 09:07PM
The dems and the their media lapdogs keep stringing along their blind partisan followers (like Gerry) and never deliver.
One tiny example out of a thousand: this past Monday MSNBC:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYc-mDFBYRw
Listen to this hysterical nonsense - and then the dramatic close where they predict Rogers will drop a "bomb" on Trump in their testimony Wednesday (now today).
What happened today?
Watch 9 frustrated and angry CNN/democrat operatives express frustration at the results of today's hearing: BREAKING NEWS: INTEL CHIEFS: NEVER FELT PRESSURED TO SWAY RUSSIA PROBE. And then spin spin spin.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wY82Edymxw
One tiny example out of a thousand: this past Monday MSNBC:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYc-mDFBYRw
Listen to this hysterical nonsense - and then the dramatic close where they predict Rogers will drop a "bomb" on Trump in their testimony Wednesday (now today).
What happened today?
Watch 9 frustrated and angry CNN/democrat operatives express frustration at the results of today's hearing: BREAKING NEWS: INTEL CHIEFS: NEVER FELT PRESSURED TO SWAY RUSSIA PROBE. And then spin spin spin.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wY82Edymxw
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
Libtardz! Lolz!
()
Date: June 07, 2017 09:16PM
It's so cute to watch the lil' libshits get their hopes up all the time only to see them get squashed over and over and over..........
I'll NEVER get tired of it.
Attachments:
I'll NEVER get tired of it.
Attachments:
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: June 07, 2017 09:20PM
This presidency is effectively done. For whatever period he remains in office he will be seriously hindered. He's a really lame lame duck 5 months in.
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
Pc retards.
()
Date: June 07, 2017 09:46PM
Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This presidency is effectively done. For whatever
> period he remains in office he will be seriously
> hindered. He's a really lame lame duck 5 months
> in.
Why do you hate America, Gerry?
-------------------------------------------------------
> This presidency is effectively done. For whatever
> period he remains in office he will be seriously
> hindered. He's a really lame lame duck 5 months
> in.
Why do you hate America, Gerry?
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
Gerry Is From Utah Before FXCO
()
Date: June 07, 2017 10:29PM
Right!! Gerry admit it..You worked there near trains..
Thats Why..
Wearing High Top Boots on Trains Carrying Goats Has Been Outlawed!!
Your Pal...DAJAX ..LOL!
Thats Why..
Wearing High Top Boots on Trains Carrying Goats Has Been Outlawed!!
Your Pal...DAJAX ..LOL!
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
hhxwt
()
Date: June 07, 2017 10:34PM
i would bet on port on the whitehouse lawn coming 30 years before that happened
just sayin
just sayin
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
I Award Myself
()
Date: June 07, 2017 10:40PM
1 "Hero Of The Sewer Pin"..For That Quip..!
Russia Made me Do It..LOL
DAJAX..
Russia Made me Do It..LOL
DAJAX..
Re: Do you think there will be handcuffs and a perp walk from the White House?
Posted by:
Gayvid_Blimmo
()
Date: June 07, 2017 10:49PM
Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Face it, Trump is too big of s loser.
> Deal with it.
WHO won the election? HINT: It wasn't H. R. Clinton. This means Trump ISN'T the loser. No wonder they call you "libtards".
-------------------------------------------------------
> Face it, Trump is too big of s loser.
> Deal with it.
WHO won the election? HINT: It wasn't H. R. Clinton. This means Trump ISN'T the loser. No wonder they call you "libtards".