A new poll shows an astonishing 52% of Republicans incorrectly think Trump won the popular vote

https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=https://img.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/files/2016/12/wood.png&w=1484

90% of liberals mistakenly believe anyone gives a shit about their feelings

So fucking what? It's over you piker. Get to work on your next candidate and stop whining.

^Replies are so Brawndo!

'Stop pointing out how stupid people are because you are so stupider'

...I weep for the future.

100% know that Bernie won the popular votes.
Popular votes mean jack shit to Democrats

Suck it losers

How's that, buttfuck?

An astonishing number of democrats don't know how their crooked party cheated Bernie out of the nomination.

Because they're stupid.

Bernie sanders Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 100% know that Bernie won the popular votes.
>

That's wrong too. Where the fuck do you people get your information?

Frank S. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bernie sanders Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 100% know that Bernie won the popular votes.
> >
>
> That's wrong too. Where the fuck do you people
> get your information?


We "fudged" the numbers.

Last I saw, HRC got 65.8 M. If you add 63M for Trump, 4.5M for Johnson, 1.5M for Stein, 1M write-ins, who LEGALLY voted for president, that is over 70M who didn't want her.

In our Republic, there is no such thing as having 'WON' the popular vote. The nationwide popular vote isn't contested, so it is nothing to win. What is contested is the state by state vote, which then directs the electors how to vote to represent THEIR people in THEIR states.

There is a reason why the Electoral College exists, and it's a very good one: the more populated areas would always carry the election, and politicians would never even reach out to or campaign in other areas.


Consider: Clinton beat Trump in California alone by about 4 million votes. She 'won' nationwide by 2 million. If you back out JUST California, not only does her popular 'win' evaporate, the new total would be Trump winning the national popular vote by 2 million.

Most of the country does not want California, the land of fruits and nuts, to have such power in determining how the rest of us will live.
The number of electors states have reflects their relative population sizes. That's fair enough.

Who in the fuck actually believes anything they read in the Washington Post?

So What??? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Last I saw, HRC got 65.8 M. If you add 63M for
> Trump, 4.5M for Johnson, 1.5M for Stein, 1M
> write-ins, who LEGALLY voted for president, that
> is over 70M who didn't want her.
>
> In our Republic, there is no such thing as having
> 'WON' the popular vote. The nationwide popular
> vote isn't contested, so it is nothing to win.
> What is contested is the state by state vote,
> which then directs the electors how to vote to
> represent THEIR people in THEIR states.
>
> There is a reason why the Electoral College
> exists, and it's a very good one: the more
> populated areas would always carry the election,
> and politicians would never even reach out to or
> campaign in other areas.
>
>
> Consider: Clinton beat Trump in California alone
> by about 4 million votes. She 'won' nationwide by
> 2 million. If you back out JUST California, not
> only does her popular 'win' evaporate, the new
> total would be Trump winning the national popular
> vote by 2 million.
>
> Most of the country does not want California, the
> land of fruits and nuts, to have such power in
> determining how the rest of us will live.
> The number of electors states have reflects their
> relative population sizes. That's fair enough.


Well that's just shit my 5 year old knows. You're speaking truth and facts. You're what libtards call fascist, racist, xenophobic, homophobic. You're what I call an American.

Libtards just hate America. They are pathetic loser, cry babies who nees to face the fact that they are irrelevant in the USA.

So What??? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Last I saw, HRC got 65.8 M. If you add 63M for
> Trump, 4.5M for Johnson, 1.5M for Stein, 1M
> write-ins, who LEGALLY voted for president, that
> is over 70M who didn't want her.
>
>


So, if you add 65.8M for HRC, 4.5M for Johnson, 1.5M for Stein, 1M for write-ins, then that is 72.8M who didn't want Trump.

MakingShitUpAgain Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who in the fuck actually believes anything they
> read in the Washington Post?


It wasn't a Washington Post poll, dumbfuck. They just reported it. So I guess polling company lied too.

Here you have the right wing in a "nut"shell. This idiot really believes Trump won the popular vote. How he manages to believe that, I haven't a clue. He probably believes the earth is 6000 years old too.

You are so redundant repeating things ad naseum, he won the election, nothing is going to change that. 99% of Liberals feel, just for this election, the guy with the bigger popular vote tally should be president, but just for this election.

KKKillary KKKlinton. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So What??? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Last I saw, HRC got 65.8 M. If you add 63M for
> > Trump, 4.5M for Johnson, 1.5M for Stein, 1M
> > write-ins, who LEGALLY voted for president,
> that
> > is over 70M who didn't want her.
> >
> > In our Republic, there is no such thing as
> having
> > 'WON' the popular vote. The nationwide popular
> > vote isn't contested, so it is nothing to win.
> > What is contested is the state by state vote,
> > which then directs the electors how to vote to
> > represent THEIR people in THEIR states.
> >
> > There is a reason why the Electoral College
> > exists, and it's a very good one: the more
> > populated areas would always carry the
> election,
> > and politicians would never even reach out to
> or
> > campaign in other areas.
> >
> >
> > Consider: Clinton beat Trump in California
> alone
> > by about 4 million votes. She 'won' nationwide
> by
> > 2 million. If you back out JUST California, not
> > only does her popular 'win' evaporate, the new
> > total would be Trump winning the national
> popular
> > vote by 2 million.
> >
> > Most of the country does not want California,
> the
> > land of fruits and nuts, to have such power in
> > determining how the rest of us will live.
> > The number of electors states have reflects
> their
> > relative population sizes. That's fair enough.
>
>
> Well that's just shit my 5 year old knows. You're
> speaking truth and facts. You're what libtards
> call fascist, racist, xenophobic, homophobic.
> You're what I call an American.
>
> Libtards just hate America. They are pathetic
> loser, cry babies who nees to face the fact that
> they are irrelevant in the USA.

Without fail, Conservatives are so emotional. Drama queens. Relax bro. It wouldnt matter if you believe fact or fiction its obvious you are too emotional to do anything other than vote for your tribe - that most certainly does not include Democrats, you hate them more than the KGB. Which, is an amazing thing on its own...

shut up already Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You are so redundant repeating things ad naseum,
> he won the election, nothing is going to change
> that. 99% of Liberals feel, just for this
> election, the guy with the bigger popular vote
> tally should be president, but just for this
> election.


Id vote for that in 2000 too though. Think of what we could have avoided if Gore was pres vs. W. Gore would have read his PDB and stopped 9/11. Oh and you can expect much worse than 9/11 within the 1st year of Don

NKeXt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ^Replies are so
> Brawndo!
>
> 'Stop pointing out how stupid people are because
> you are so stupider'
>
> ...I weep for the future.


Liberals weep for just about everything...u saw liberal reaction to trump winning?

Frank S. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So What??? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Last I saw, HRC got 65.8 M. If you add 63M for
> > Trump, 4.5M for Johnson, 1.5M for Stein, 1M
> > write-ins, who LEGALLY voted for president,
> that
> > is over 70M who didn't want her.
> >
> >
>
>
> So, if you add 65.8M for HRC, 4.5M for Johnson,
> 1.5M for Stein, 1M for write-ins, then that is
> 72.8M who didn't want Trump.

Thanks for proving the point...there is no win of the "popular" vote. If it was between two people you could have popular vote (but it wasn't) regardless it's the electoral vote that counts.

xHkTD Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> shut up already Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You are so redundant repeating things ad naseum,
>
> > he won the election, nothing is going to change
> > that. 99% of Liberals feel, just for this
> > election, the guy with the bigger popular vote
> > tally should be president, but just for this
> > election.
>
>
> Id vote for that in 2000 too though. Think of
> what we could have avoided if Gore was pres vs. W.
> Gore would have read his PDB and stopped 9/11.
> Oh and you can expect much worse than 9/11 within
> the 1st year of Don


LOL You don't even know who Gore's opponent was^^^ LOL. It was Bush.

Frank S. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> MakingShitUpAgain Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Who in the fuck actually believes anything they
> > read in the Washington Post?
>
>
> It wasn't a Washington Post poll, dumbfuck. They
> just reported it. So I guess polling company lied
> too.
>
> Here you have the right wing in a "nut"shell.
> This idiot really believes Trump won the popular
> vote. How he manages to believe that, I haven't a
> clue. He probably believes the earth is 6000
> years old too.

Doesn't matter who conducted the poll. The Post has a long established history of regurgitating bullshit no matter where it comes from.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/07/post-abc-tracking-poll-clinton-47-trump-43-on-election-eve/?utm_term=.151e4adbacca

vote for your tribe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> KKKillary KKKlinton. Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > So What??? Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Last I saw, HRC got 65.8 M. If you add 63M
> for
> > > Trump, 4.5M for Johnson, 1.5M for Stein, 1M
> > > write-ins, who LEGALLY voted for president,
> > that
> > > is over 70M who didn't want her.
> > >
> > > In our Republic, there is no such thing as
> > having
> > > 'WON' the popular vote. The nationwide
> popular
> > > vote isn't contested, so it is nothing to
> win.
> > > What is contested is the state by state vote,
> > > which then directs the electors how to vote
> to
> > > represent THEIR people in THEIR states.
> > >
> > > There is a reason why the Electoral College
> > > exists, and it's a very good one: the more
> > > populated areas would always carry the
> > election,
> > > and politicians would never even reach out to
> > or
> > > campaign in other areas.
> > >
> > >
> > > Consider: Clinton beat Trump in California
> > alone
> > > by about 4 million votes. She 'won'
> nationwide
> > by
> > > 2 million. If you back out JUST California,
> not
> > > only does her popular 'win' evaporate, the
> new
> > > total would be Trump winning the national
> > popular
> > > vote by 2 million.
> > >
> > > Most of the country does not want California,
> > the
> > > land of fruits and nuts, to have such power
> in
> > > determining how the rest of us will live.
> > > The number of electors states have reflects
> > their
> > > relative population sizes. That's fair
> enough.
> >
> >
> > Well that's just shit my 5 year old knows.
> You're
> > speaking truth and facts. You're what libtards
> > call fascist, racist, xenophobic, homophobic.
> > You're what I call an American.
> >
> > Libtards just hate America. They are pathetic
> > loser, cry babies who nees to face the fact
> that
> > they are irrelevant in the USA.
>
> Without fail, Conservatives are so emotional.
> Drama queens. Relax bro. It wouldnt matter if
> you believe fact or fiction its obvious you are
> too emotional to do anything other than vote for
> your tribe - that most certainly does not include
> Democrats, you hate them more than the KGB.
> Which, is an amazing thing on its own...

I don't know if you're being sarcastic or just a typically insane libtard. Dramtic, emotional, KGB? 1982 called!
L-O-FUCKING-L!!!

4 years from now Trump will win the popular vote by multimillions by winning over the big states with his programs. If he keeps the wet backs out, you know 89 percent of the folks in CA will vote Trump.

vote for your tribe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> KKKillary KKKlinton. Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > So What??? Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Last I saw, HRC got 65.8 M. If you add 63M
> for
> > > Trump, 4.5M for Johnson, 1.5M for Stein, 1M
> > > write-ins, who LEGALLY voted for president,
> > that
> > > is over 70M who didn't want her.
> > >
> > > In our Republic, there is no such thing as
> > having
> > > 'WON' the popular vote. The nationwide
> popular
> > > vote isn't contested, so it is nothing to
> win.
> > > What is contested is the state by state vote,
> > > which then directs the electors how to vote
> to
> > > represent THEIR people in THEIR states.
> > >
> > > There is a reason why the Electoral College
> > > exists, and it's a very good one: the more
> > > populated areas would always carry the
> > election,
> > > and politicians would never even reach out to
> > or
> > > campaign in other areas.
> > >
> > >
> > > Consider: Clinton beat Trump in California
> > alone
> > > by about 4 million votes. She 'won'
> nationwide
> > by
> > > 2 million. If you back out JUST California,
> not
> > > only does her popular 'win' evaporate, the
> new
> > > total would be Trump winning the national
> > popular
> > > vote by 2 million.
> > >
> > > Most of the country does not want California,
> > the
> > > land of fruits and nuts, to have such power
> in
> > > determining how the rest of us will live.
> > > The number of electors states have reflects
> > their
> > > relative population sizes. That's fair
> enough.
> >
> >
> > Well that's just shit my 5 year old knows.
> You're
> > speaking truth and facts. You're what libtards
> > call fascist, racist, xenophobic, homophobic.
> > You're what I call an American.
> >
> > Libtards just hate America. They are pathetic
> > loser, cry babies who nees to face the fact
> that
> > they are irrelevant in the USA.
>
> Without fail, Conservatives are so emotional.
> Drama queens. Relax bro. It wouldnt matter if
> you believe fact or fiction its obvious you are
> too emotional to do anything other than vote for
> your tribe - that most certainly does not include
> Democrats, you hate them more than the KGB.
> Which, is an amazing thing on its own...

It's not Conservatives who are crying their eyes out and diving for a safe space.

xHkTD Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------


> Id vote for that in 2000 too though. Think of
> what we could have avoided if Gore was pres vs. W.
> Gore would have read his PDB and stopped 9/11.
> Oh and you can expect much worse than 9/11 within
> the 1st year of Don

You mean kind of like when Clinton stopped the first World Center Trade bombing in 1993 by reading his PDB? Oh Wait....then he called it "regrettable, treated it like a twister in Arkansas, and urged the public not to "over react."

It was Bush Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> xHkTD Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > shut up already Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > You are so redundant repeating things ad
> naseum,
> >
> > > he won the election, nothing is going to
> change
> > > that. 99% of Liberals feel, just for this
> > > election, the guy with the bigger popular
> vote
> > > tally should be president, but just for this
> > > election.
> >
> >
> > Id vote for that in 2000 too though. Think of
> > what we could have avoided if Gore was pres vs.
> W.
> > Gore would have read his PDB and stopped 9/11.
>
> > Oh and you can expect much worse than 9/11
> within
> > the 1st year of Don
>
>
> LOL You don't even know who Gore's opponent
> was^^^ LOL. It was Bush.

please god I hope you are a troll no one can be this stupid

shut up already Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You are so redundant repeating things ad naseum,
> he won the election, nothing is going to change
> that. 99% of Liberals feel, just for this
> election, the guy with the bigger popular vote
> tally should be president, but just for this
> election.


No, actually we feel that way for 2 out of the last 5 elections.

,
Attachments:

CVjme Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A new poll shows an astonishing 52% of Republicans
> incorrectly think Trump won the popular vote
>
> https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?sr
> c=https://img.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage
> /files/2016/12/wood.png&w=1484

And 100% of liberals are butt hurt over losing the election.

So What Again!! If Trump was out to win the popular vote he would have done it. He was out to Win The Electoral Vote and he did..

California.. supposed to have 35 million!! Bullshit more like 48 million and 12 mil of Um are Illegal..

So libs Want DC Statehood..To Get 2 Automatic Lib US Senators.. OK Give DC back to Maryland, Then Divide California into 3 states ..New York Too. Good By Libs !

AND They Can Give NOVA To Maryland as well..

DAJAX

;)
Attachments:

those are the deplorables.

And will be butthurt for the next 8 years.

Tell me with whom you walk, and I'll tell you who you are?

Is she serious??? That's really gutsy/stupid and delusional. She has spent her life walking with an undisputed predator of women and then covered his misdeeds by referring to all the women he seduced/attacked as bimbo's or right wing conspirators. She has no shame.

Gutsy/stupid tweet Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Tell me with whom you walk, and I'll tell you who
> you are?
>
> Is she serious??? That's really gutsy/stupid and
> delusional. She has spent her life walking with an
> undisputed predator of women and then covered his
> misdeeds by referring to all the women he
> seduced/attacked as bimbo's or right wing
> conspirators. She has no shame.


Shut up you Goldman Sachs bitch.

How'd that work out?

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gutsy/stupid tweet Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Tell me with whom you walk, and I'll tell you
> who
> > you are?
> >
> > Is she serious??? That's really gutsy/stupid
> and
> > delusional. She has spent her life walking with
> an
> > undisputed predator of women and then covered
> his
> > misdeeds by referring to all the women he
> > seduced/attacked as bimbo's or right wing
> > conspirators. She has no shame.
>
>
> Shut up you Goldman Sachs bitch.


Obama hired mroe from Goldman Sachs than anyone else.

Bitch.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gutsy/stupid tweet Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Tell me with whom you walk, and I'll tell you
> who
> > you are?
> >
> > Is she serious??? That's really gutsy/stupid
> and
> > delusional. She has spent her life walking with
> an
> > undisputed predator of women and then covered
> his
> > misdeeds by referring to all the women he
> > seduced/attacked as bimbo's or right wing
> > conspirators. She has no shame.
>
>
> Shut up you Goldman Sachs bitch.

Gerry, she is the Goldman's bitch, not me. Is this a Liberal enough and apologist source for you? Read the comments, you may be enlightened.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/10/17/i-read-hillary-clintons-speeches-to-goldman-sachs-heres-what-surprised-me-the-most/?utm_term=.a151c73ebd26

No you're a Goldman Sachs bitch because the person you voted for has done nothing but appoint an administration that is practically exclusively Goldman Sachs and you're still talking about what Hillary may have done. That makes you a double goldman sachs bitch actually. Don't do that anymore, at the very least don't be a double bitch.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No you're a Goldman Sachs bitch because the person
> you voted for has done nothing but appoint an
> administration that is practically exclusively
> Goldman Sachs and you're still talking about what
> Hillary may have done. That makes you a double
> goldman sachs bitch actually. Don't do that
> anymore, at the very least don't be a double
> bitch.


Obama hired more from Goldman Sachs than Trump has.

Bitch.

'
Attachments:

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No you're a Goldman Sachs bitch because the person
> you voted for has done nothing but appoint an
> administration that is practically exclusively
> Goldman Sachs and you're still talking about what
> Hillary may have done. That makes you a double
> goldman sachs bitch actually. Don't do that
> anymore, at the very least don't be a double
> bitch.


https://prof77.wordpress.com/politics/an-updated-list-of-goldman-sachs-ties-to-the-obama-government-including-elena-kagan/

Fake News Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > No you're a Goldman Sachs bitch because the
> person
> > you voted for has done nothing but appoint an
> > administration that is practically exclusively
> > Goldman Sachs and you're still talking about
> what
> > Hillary may have done. That makes you a double
> > goldman sachs bitch actually. Don't do that
> > anymore, at the very least don't be a double
> > bitch.
>
>
> Obama hired more from Goldman Sachs than Trump
> has.
>
> Bitch.

You're a moron buddy.

We've got a Goldman Sachs bailout foreclosure king running our treasure and the president of Goldman Sachs as our CHIEF Economic Advisor.

You dumb fuck. You fucking dumb fuck. They own us now.

Plus that con artist of yours ran against Goldman Sachs with Cruz and Hillary. Where is the accountability motherfucker? Why are you making excuses bitch? What did that piece of shit run on?

That's the difference between liberals and conservatives. Conservatives are bitches that make excuses for getting fucked in the ass.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fake News Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > No you're a Goldman Sachs bitch because the
> > person
> > > you voted for has done nothing but appoint an
> > > administration that is practically
> exclusively
> > > Goldman Sachs and you're still talking about
> > what
> > > Hillary may have done. That makes you a
> double
> > > goldman sachs bitch actually. Don't do that
> > > anymore, at the very least don't be a double
> > > bitch.
> >
> >
> > Obama hired more from Goldman Sachs than Trump
> > has.
> >
> > Bitch.
>
> You're a moron buddy.


I'm right.

Bitch.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We've got a Goldman Sachs bailout foreclosure king
> running our treasure and the president of Goldman
> Sachs as our CHIEF Economic Advisor.
>
> You dumb fuck. You fucking dumb fuck. They own us
> now.

Jacob Joseph "Jack" Lew (born August 29, 1955) is an American government administrator and attorney who is the 76th and current United States Secretary of the Treasury, serving since February 28, 2013. He served as the 25th White House Chief of Staff from 2012 to 2013. Lew previously served as Director of the Office of Management and Budget in the Clinton and Obama Administrations, and is a member of the Democratic Party.

On January 10, 2013, Lew was nominated as the replacement for retiring Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, to serve in President Barack Obama's second term.[1] On February 27, 2013, the Senate confirmed Lew for the position. He was sworn in the following day.

In June 2006, Lew was named chief operating officer of Citigroup's Alternative Investments unit, a proprietary trading group. The unit he oversaw invested in a hedge fund "that bet on the housing market to collapse."[24] During his work at Citigroup, Lew had invested heavily in funds in Ugland House while he worked as an investment banker at Citigroup during the 2008 financial meltdown.[25] Lew also had oversight of Citigroup subsidiaries in countries including, Bermuda, the Cayman Islands, and Hong Kong; and during his time at Citigroup, Citigroup subsidiaries in the Cayman Islands increased to 113.[26]

Your guy ran against Goldman Sachs. Have you no shame? He shamed Ted Cruz and Hillary Clinton about their ties to Goldman Sachs.

Now Goldman Sachs fully controls our economy. And you're here trying to justify this? This is what the dumb piece of shit you voted for ran on. Am I talking English? Do you people have no sense of dignity or self respect?

Obviously not, you're fucking Trump supporters. Nevermind, you're garbage.

Whoa, Gerry is TRIGGERED tonight!!!!

I'm not triggered. I speak for the majority. People are outraged at your stupidity. How you have put the nation in a compromised position for what? He's done the opposite of everything he ran on so far. And not a care in the world.

If you're going to hand the country over to this fucking idiot we at least expect you to have some self respect and keep him accountable.

It is your fucking responsibility to keep him accountable. You accepted that responsibility with your vote. You believed him, we didn't fucking believe him. Now you're responsible for him fulfilling his campaign promises not covering for a complete reversal.

Gerry, Gerry, Gerry...still trying to get into the Trump admin by cussing and insulting your adversaries. It's not going to work!

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'm not triggered. I speak for the majority.
> People are outraged at your stupidity. How you
> have put the nation in a compromised position for
> what? He's done the opposite of everything he ran
> on so far. And not a care in the world.
>
> If you're going to hand the country over to this
> fucking idiot we at least expect you to have some
> self respect and keep him accountable.
>
> It is your fucking responsibility to keep him
> accountable. You accepted that responsibility
> with your vote. You believed him, we didn't
> fucking believe him. Now you're responsible for
> him fulfilling his campaign promises not covering
> for a complete reversal.


The stupid, shitsmelling, triggered goatfucker wants to talk accountability?

After eight years of mocha choom's pen, phone, and leading from behind, there is no such thing as holding a POTUS accountable.

Sow the wind; Reap the whirlwind.

Imagine a boot stamping on your muzzie paki rageboy face forever.

vote for your tribe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> KKKillary KKKlinton. Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > So What??? Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Last I saw, HRC got 65.8 M. If you add 63M
> for
> > > Trump, 4.5M for Johnson, 1.5M for Stein, 1M
> > > write-ins, who LEGALLY voted for president,
> > that
> > > is over 70M who didn't want her.
> > >
> > > In our Republic, there is no such thing as
> > having
> > > 'WON' the popular vote. The nationwide
> popular
> > > vote isn't contested, so it is nothing to
> win.
> > > What is contested is the state by state vote,
> > > which then directs the electors how to vote
> to
> > > represent THEIR people in THEIR states.
> > >
> > > There is a reason why the Electoral College
> > > exists, and it's a very good one: the more
> > > populated areas would always carry the
> > election,
> > > and politicians would never even reach out to
> > or
> > > campaign in other areas.
> > >
> > >
> > > Consider: Clinton beat Trump in California
> > alone
> > > by about 4 million votes. She 'won'
> nationwide
> > by
> > > 2 million. If you back out JUST California,
> not
> > > only does her popular 'win' evaporate, the
> new
> > > total would be Trump winning the national
> > popular
> > > vote by 2 million.
> > >
> > > Most of the country does not want California,
> > the
> > > land of fruits and nuts, to have such power
> in
> > > determining how the rest of us will live.
> > > The number of electors states have reflects
> > their
> > > relative population sizes. That's fair
> enough.
> >
> >
> > Well that's just shit my 5 year old knows.
> You're
> > speaking truth and facts. You're what libtards
> > call fascist, racist, xenophobic, homophobic.
> > You're what I call an American.
> >
> > Libtards just hate America. They are pathetic
> > loser, cry babies who nees to face the fact
> that
> > they are irrelevant in the USA.
>
> Without fail, Conservatives are so emotional.
> Drama queens. Relax bro. It wouldnt matter if
> you believe fact or fiction its obvious you are
> too emotional to do anything other than vote for
> your tribe - that most certainly does not include
> Democrats, you hate them more than the KGB.
> Which, is an amazing thing on its own...
See

Republicans emotional drama queens
Attachments:

COMBINED LIST OF GOLDIES TIED TO THE OBAMA GOVERNMENT.
This lists compiles the names above and those in the prior diary on this. For more detail on names not annotated in this diary, see the earlier diary linked here):

ALTMAN, ROGER.
BERKOWITZ, HOWARD P.
BIDEN, JOE.
BRAINARD, LAEL.
BUFFETT, WARREN.
CLINTON, HILLARY.
CRAIG, GREGORY. (revolving door)
DONILON, THOMAS.
DUDLEY, WILLIAM C.
EFFRON, BLAIR W.
ELMENDORF, DOUGLAS.
EMANUEL, RAHM.
FARRELL, DIANA.
FRIEDMAN, STEPHEN.
FROMAN, Michael.
FUDGE, ANNE.
FURMAN, JASON.
GALLOGLY, MARK.
GEITHNER, TIMOTHY.
GENSLER, GARY.
GEPHARDT, RICHARD (aka “DICK”) A.
GREENSTONE, MICHAEL (revolving door to Hamilton Project)
HAMILTON PROJECT, THE
HORMATS, ROBERT.
KAGAN, ELENA.
KASHKARI, NEEL.
KORNBLUH, KAREN.
LEW, JACOB (AKA “JACK”) J.
LIDDY, EDWARD MICHAEL.
LIPTON, DAVID A.
MINDICH, ERIC
MURPHY, PHILLIP.
NIEDERAUER, DUNCAN.
OBAMA, BARACK H.
ORSZAG, PETER.
PATTERSON, MARK.
PERRY, RICHARD.
RATTNER, STEVE.
REISCHAUER, ROBERT D.
RIVLIN, ALICE.
RUBIN, JAMES.
RUBIN, ROBERT.
SHAFRAN, STEVEN.
SPERLING, GENE.
STORCH, ADAM.
SUMMERS, LARRY.
THAIN, JOHN.
TYSON, LAURA D’ANDREA.

If you subtract the illegal voters from the Democratic count it seems that Trump would have won in the double-digits!

Either way, an Electoral College victory is all it takes! Suck it, Dems!