Larry Dawson, white male 66 years old Christian and self proclaimed "prophet of God."



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03/28/2016 05:16PM by Gerrymanderer2.

First thing is first. Donald Trump needs to be able to say the words radical Christian terrorism.

Say the words faggot.

Second. I want every Trumptard on here to condemn the actions of this fellow old Tennessee white male Christian probably Trumptard or be considered condoning terror.

You're a racist because you had to wait to post this since you thought that it was a Muslim.

Condemn radical Christian terrorism you bastards if you're not terrorists.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Larry Dawson, white male 66 years old Christian
> and self proclaimed "prophet of God."

Reeks of Trump supporter.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> First thing is first. Donald Trump needs to be
> able to say the words radical Christian
> terrorism.
>
> Say the words faggot.
>
> Second. I want every Trumptard on here to condemn
> the actions of this fellow old Tennessee white
> male Christian probably Trumptard or be considered
> condoning terror.


Libtardz!

LoLz!

See these damn Trumptard terrorists won't condemn radical christian terror. Trumptards are terrorists.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> See these damn Trumptard terrorists won't condemn
> radical christian terror. Trumptards are
> terrorists.

Libtardz!

LoLz!

Too late Gerr.

Your Muslim brothers were already trying the moral equivalence crap.

Siraj Hashmi 40m40 minutes ago

Capitol Shooter Larry Dawson Shouted He Was 'Prophet of God', That's White for "Allahu Akbar"

So do you condemn this act of Trumptard inspired radical Christian terror or not?

Now Gerry wants to talk shit lol Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You're a racist because you had to wait to post
> this since you thought that it was a Muslim.

Rightards automatically think 'radical Muslim terrorist'. I automatically thought 'ignorant redneck gun nut'. Looks like I won.

Now Gerry wants to talk shit lol Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You're a racist because you had to wait to post
> this since you thought that it was a Muslim.


Shows his true colors through his response, a real hypocritical coward even worse a 'moral coward". That post revealed it all, he laid himself open for what his moral fiber consist of. Better a 100 so-called "Trumptards" then one person like this polluter. Gerry you really hurt your credibility with that post. Don't you have any pangs of conscious?

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So do you condemn this act of Trumptard inspired
> radical Christian terror or not?

No, you're next.

It's a hard nog life Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > So do you condemn this act of Trumptard
> inspired
> > radical Christian terror or not?
>
> No, you're next.

Archived. See I told you these Trumptards were terrorists.

They're either chicken shit faggot bitches or terrorists. There's no in between.

You seem to be a very angry person. I stay out of politics, enjoy life, and am happy. You sound like you're going to die of a hemmorage, Gerry.

"But he's not a real Trump Christian."

Amirite?

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Larry Dawson, white male 66 years old Christian
> and self proclaimed "prophet of God."


Nice attempt at showing your bigotry Gerr bear.

turn out he is another Bern-out democrat terrorist. we will now await Gerry's official apology to the Donald.

As soon as we get an official apology to Muslims by all the Trumptard retards that start the speculation bullshit every time.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As soon as we get an official apology to Muslims
> by all the Trumptard retards that start the
> speculation bullshit every time.




That's a bitch huh?

LMAO!!!

You bitches were wrong. Not a Muslim you faggots. Shut your fucking cockholsters next time.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As soon as we get an official apology to Muslims
> by all the Trumptard retards that start the
> speculation bullshit every time.


typical dishonest tactics from the left shamelessly trying to blame horrible crimes on the Donald. these people are pure scum.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Larry Dawson, white male 66 years old Christian
> and self proclaimed "prophet of God."

Not only was he wrong (as always) but Gerryfagtard now refuses to admit it. You shut YOUR cockholster, cucktard.

Funny shit as always, when the Real Facts surface. They knew who he was, but let is simmer enough to possibly place the blame on a white guy. Suck it Gerry, He's on your team. somebody on our team shot him.

What are you idiots gloating over? You're the ones who thought this guy was a Muslim terrorist.

True the Vote's Father
Attachments:

Hypocrites Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What are you idiots gloating over? You're the ones
> who thought this guy was a Muslim terrorist.


Looks like a muslim terrorist to me.

Is that Al Roker aka Mr. Potato Head?

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Larry Dawson, white male 66 years old Christian
> and self proclaimed "prophet of God."


Another example of demokrat idiots so happy to find a story that appears to fit their narrative and agenda. So rarely does their fantasy world show any hints of reality. The skreeching, shrill, unhinged happiness at dancing in the blood of viktims often overkomes fakts in a kase, such as this one.

I wouldn't thinkk of branding Dawson a terrorist, he's just a misguided demokrat who broke the law and lukkily no one was killed.

This gerry2 fellow on the other hand is quite the forum warrior, probably the most timid of demokrats when faced with real-world challenges. He should be pitied, but not taken seriously.

------------------------------------

twitter @EyeAmU

Gerry thought that this was a lock.

A guy named Larry Russell Dawson from Buttfuck, Tennessee MUST be a white redneck Trump supporter!

lol

conVince Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Larry Dawson, white male 66 years old Christian
> > and self proclaimed "prophet of God."
>
>
> Another example of demokrat idiots so happy to
> find a story that appears to fit their narrative
> and agenda. So rarely does their fantasy world
> show any hints of reality. The skreeching,
> shrill, unhinged happiness at dancing in the blood
> of viktims often overkomes fakts in a kase, such
> as this one.
>
> I wouldn't thinkk of branding Dawson a terrorist,
> he's just a misguided demokrat who broke the law
> and lukkily no one was killed.
>
> This gerry2 fellow on the other hand is quite the
> forum warrior, probably the most timid of
> demokrats when faced with real-world challenges.
> He should be pitied, but not taken seriously.

lol hey faggot. I didnt start it. Your fellow rightards were saying it was a Muslim liberal first. Maybe you punk bitches will hold off the "spekulation" next time.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> lol hey faggot. I didnt start it. Your fellow
> rightards were saying it was a Muslim liberal
> first. Maybe you punk bitches will hold off the
> "spekulation" next time.


Libtard

Nigger/Spic

Muslim

^ Pick any two and you'll be right 99% of the time.

For someone who towed the democrat party line 100% of the time, you sure use derogatory words for homosexuals quite a lot.

U r confused Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> For someone who towed the democrat party line 100%
> of the time, you sure use derogatory words for
> homosexuals quite a lot.

Republicans tend to be very homosexual. Its a force of habit as a result.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> U r confused Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > For someone who towed the democrat party line
> 100%
> > of the time, you sure use derogatory words for
> > homosexuals quite a lot.
>
> Republicans tend to be very homosexual. Its a
> force of habit as a result

Click click click backspace backspace enter. Edit, click cuck cuck.
Attachments:

I'm sure there is a selfie of Larry and Obama, not the homo Larry, but the black Larry libtard negro that was shot by a good guy with a gun.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> First thing is first. Donald Trump needs to be
> able to say the words radical Christian
> terrorism.
>
> Say the words faggot.
>
> Second. I want every Trumptard on here to condemn
> the actions of this fellow old Tennessee white
> male Christian probably Trumptard or be considered
> condoning terror.


Radical Demtard terrorism. Say it Gerry!

Now go ahead and condemn this Bernout Sanders $15/hr minimum libtard. Or do you condone terrorism too?


lol... another day, another libtard embarrassment...

Gerry will put his thumb over Angela's face and fap away.

It's the hateful libtard rhetoric and dog whistles that drive these people to do things like this.

Terrorist was friend of Obama? Why does Obama hang out with violent dictatators who brutalize poor people, and terrorists who hate and blow up people?

Fay

The difference Gerry, you curry nigger fucktard, is that white radical Christians aren't bombing Pakistan or any other sand nigger country. See the difference??

#NotAllWhiteChristians Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Capitol Shooter Larry Dawson Shouted He Was
> 'Prophet of God', That's White for "Allahu Akbar"

+1

Truth out, bitches!

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As soon as we get an official apology to Muslims
> by all the Trumptard retards that start the
> speculation bullshit every time.


You started this thread with inaccurate speculation moron. Are you really this stupid or are you just pretending?

Gerry is dumb Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You started this thread with inaccurate
> speculation moron. Are you really this stupid or
> are you just pretending?

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Larry Dawson, white male 66 years old Christian
> and self proclaimed "prophet of God."

The only thing Gerry got wrong was the shooter's race. The important points, he nailed:

Larry Dawson, male 66 years old Christian and self proclaimed "prophet of God."

Conserva-tards!

LoLz!

~~ 'Prophet of God', that's conserva-tard for "Allahu Akbar" ~~

Everything BUT an angry white conservative...it's always funny how quickly libs get silent when facts come out.

LOL libtardz.

NLXHw Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Everything BUT an angry white conservative...it's
> always funny how quickly libs get silent when
> facts come out.

Larry Dawson, male [patriarchal oppressor, heck]

66 years old [oldster, check]

Christian [intolerant bible-thumper, Check]

Self proclaimed "prophet of God." [mentally deranged bible-thumper, check]

Yep, Uncle Larry checks all of the conserva-tard boxes!

Conserva-tards!

LoLz!

~~ 'Prophet of God', that's conserva-tard for "Allahu Akbar" ~~

he's a bernout $15/hr extremist

lol libtards!

lol libtards Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> he's a bernout $15/hr extremist

Deflect, deflect, deflect.

'Tards gonna 'tard!

Conserva-tards!

LoLz!

He's a southern Christian extremist. Close enough as far as I am concerned. Rightards were the ones that started calling him a Muslim and a liberal first on this forum. So go fuck yourselves. My shit was in response to your horseshit. Which is usually the case.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He's a southern Christian extremist. Close enough
> as far as I am concerned. Rightards were the ones
> that started calling him a Muslim and a liberal
> first on this forum. So go fuck yourselves. My
> shit was in response to your horseshit. Which is
> usually the case.

+1

You tell 'em, Ger-Bear!

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He's a southern Christian extremist. Close enough
> as far as I am concerned. Rightards were the ones
> that started calling him a Muslim and a liberal
> first on this forum. So go fuck yourselves. My
> shit was in response to your horseshit. Which is
> usually the case.


Again reality is not quite aligning with your demokrat agenda. If someone spekulates a shooter may be one of the Muslim terrorists you support when during the previous week over a hundred have been killed by your supported Muslim extremists in Brussels and Pakistan (mostly Christian children targeted in Pakistan), it isn't a bad guess bekause it is based on recent events.

How many have been killed by Christian "extremists" in the past week? Zero, but again that does not fit your demokrat anti-Christian-unless-they-are-black-or-illegals agenda.

Your defense of people who blow up children just so "your side" (the demokrats) can try to make a talking point is despikable. You are truly uncivilized animals siding with uncivilized animals.

------------------------------------

twitter @EyeAmU

Another bern-tard violent extremist. They seem to be everywhere these days.

conVince Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If someone spekulates a shooter may be one of the
> Muslim terrorists you support when during the
> previous week over a hundred have been killed by
> your supported Muslim extremists in Brussels and
> Pakistan (mostly Christian children
> targeted in Pakistan), it isn't a bad guess
> bekause it is based on recent events.

Still, that guess was wrong.

The gun-wielding lunatic at US Capital Visitors Center was one of yours: A fundamentalist Christian terrorist.

So fuck you.

conVince Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > He's a southern Christian extremist. Close
> enough
> > as far as I am concerned. Rightards were the
> ones
> > that started calling him a Muslim and a liberal
> > first on this forum. So go fuck yourselves.
> My
> > shit was in response to your horseshit. Which
> is
> > usually the case.
>
>
> Again reality is not quite aligning with your
> demokrat agenda. If someone spekulates a shooter
> may be one of the Muslim terrorists you support
> when during the previous week over a hundred have
> been killed by your supported Muslim extremists in
> Brussels and Pakistan (mostly Christian children
> targeted in Pakistan), it isn't a bad guess
> bekause it is based on recent events.
>
> How many have been killed by Christian
> "extremists" in the past week? Zero, but again
> that does not fit your demokrat
> anti-Christian-unless-they-are-black-or-illegals
> agenda.
>
> Your defense of people who blow up children just
> so "your side" (the demokrats) can try to make a
> talking point is despikable. You are truly
> uncivilized animals siding with uncivilized
> animals.

Most acts of terror and mass shootings in America are perpetrated by white Christian males idiot.

You sir are a moron. I go by the statistics you go by the voices in your head.

Bern Notice Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Another bern-tard violent extremist. They seem to
> be everywhere these days.

The gun-wielding lunatic at US Capital Visitors Center was one of yours: A fundamentalist Christian terrorist.

So fuck you.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Most acts of terror and mass shootings in America
> are perpetrated by white Christian males idiot.
>
> You sir are a moron. I go by the statistics you
> go by the voices in your head.

Fact: In the US since 1982, white men have committed 64% of mass shootings (Blacks 16%, Asians 9%, Latinos & 'unknown' did the rest).

Mass shooting is a white man's thing, people.

The fact of the matter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fact: In the US since 1982, white men have
> committed 64% of mass shootings (Blacks 16%,
> Asians 9%, Latinos & 'unknown' did the rest).
>
> Mass shooting is a white man's thing, people.


Link please, plus the definition of "mass shooting" used. Many of these "stats" will count a white guy shooting two people, but NOT count a gang-related shooting that kills four or five.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Most acts of terror and mass shootings in America
> are perpetrated by white Christian males idiot.

This is true: Since 1982, 64% of mass shooters have been white men (16% were black, 9% were Asian, the rest were Latinos & 'unknown').

fact checkr Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Link please, plus the definition of "mass
> shooting" used.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/27/us/mass-shootings/

Mass shootings are defined as:

1) Killing of at least four people (excluding the gunman, if killed) in a single incident (FBI classification);

2) Lone shooter; and,

3) Public location or event (i.e.; public gathering on private land).

Crimes primarily related to gang activity, armed robbery, or domestic violence in homes are not included. Also, some cases in which the killings occurred in more than one location over a short period of time (known as ‘spree killings’), that otherwise fit the above criteria are included.

Mass murder used to be 3 or more persons killed ... when did they change it.

Facts, facts, facts Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fact checkr Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Link please, plus the definition of "mass
> > shooting" used.
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/27/us/mass-shootings/
>
> Mass shootings are defined as:
>
> 1) Killing of at least four people (excluding the
> gunman, if killed) in a single incident (FBI
> classification);
>
> 2) Lone shooter; and,
>
> 3) Public location or event (i.e.; public
> gathering on private land).
>
> Crimes primarily related to gang activity, armed
> robbery, or domestic violence in homes are not
> included. Also, some cases in which the killings
> occurred in more than one location over a short
> period of time (known as ‘spree killings’),
> that otherwise fit the above criteria are
> included.


Yeah, by the definition created by Mother Jones to skew things so that the results come out to match what they want to be the case. lol

I can make the results come out differently just by changing the date range or other arbitrary criteria. In more recent years significantly so. Not to mention their classification of various shootings as "Other" and "Native" for race and similar details.

Even considering how all of that is skewed and accepting the 64% number, that still would be lower than expected for whites based on their representation in the population.

xenDe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Facts, facts, facts Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > fact checkr Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Link please, plus the definition of "mass
> > > shooting" used.
> >
> >
> http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/27/us/mass-shootings/
> >
> > Mass shootings are defined as:
> >
> > 1) Killing of at least four people (excluding
> the
> > gunman, if killed) in a single incident (FBI
> > classification);
> >
> > 2) Lone shooter; and,
> >
> > 3) Public location or event (i.e.; public
> > gathering on private land).
> >
> > Crimes primarily related to gang activity,
> armed
> > robbery, or domestic violence in homes are not
> > included. Also, some cases in which the
> killings
> > occurred in more than one location over a short
> > period of time (known as ‘spree killings’),
> > that otherwise fit the above criteria are
> > included.
>
>
> Yeah, by the definition created by Mother Jones to
> skew things so that the results come out to match
> what they want to be the case. lol
>
> I can make the results come out differently just
> by changing the date range or other arbitrary
> criteria. In more recent years significantly so.
> Not to mention their classification of various
> shootings as "Other" and "Native" for race and
> similar details.
>
> Even considering how all of that is skewed and
> accepting the 64% number, that still would be
> lower than expected for whites based on their
> representation in the population.


^ For those here too stupid to understand what this means, no, mass shootings (even as defined by Mother Jones) are not a "white thing." In fact, there simply are just many more white men in the population. Based on their numbers, they actually are less than might be expected given their numbers.

If anything, it's much less of a "white man's thing" than an "Asian man's thing." The latter are greatly over-represented as far as "mass shootings." Almost double.

They've already taken care of minimizing any chance of it being a "black man's thing" through their definitions. Change the terms slightly and theirs also will be disproportionately large.

Stupid Libtard Tricks Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > Yeah, by the definition created by Mother Jones
> to
> > skew things so that the results come out to
> match
> > what they want to be the case. lol
> >
> > I can make the results come out differently
> just
> > by changing the date range or other arbitrary
> > criteria.

That's true of any study, isn't it? lol.

> > Not to mention their classification of various
> > shootings as "Other" and "Native" for race and
> > similar details.

"Other" means they don't fit the other classifications.

"Native" mean Native American.

> > Even considering how all of that is skewed and
> > accepting the 64% number, that still would be
> > lower than expected for whites based on their
> > representation in the population.

And five time higher than for the next largest racial group.

> No, mass shootings (even as defined by Mother
> Jones) are not a "white thing." In fact,
> there simply are just many more white men in the
> population. Based on their numbers, they actually
> are less than might be expected given their
> numbers.

This is perhaps the dumbest thing I've ever read.

When a mass shooting occurs, the perp is five times more likely to be a white male than a male of any other race. So, yes, mass shootings are a white man's thing.

Fatcts, facts, facts Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> When a mass shooting occurs, the perp is five
> times more likely to be a white male than a male
> of any other race. So, yes, mass shootings are a
> white man's thing.


Patently false. They don't count nigs killing other nigs in the statistics. Case and point, any Saturday night in Chicago.

Fatcts, facts, facts Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Stupid Libtard Tricks Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > Yeah, by the definition created by Mother
> Jones
> > to
> > > skew things so that the results come out to
> > match
> > > what they want to be the case. lol
> > >
> > > I can make the results come out differently
> > just
> > > by changing the date range or other arbitrary
> > > criteria.
>
> That's true of any study, isn't it? lol.
>
> > > Not to mention their classification of
> various
> > > shootings as "Other" and "Native" for race
> and
> > > similar details.
>
> "Other" means they don't fit the other
> classifications.
>
> "Native" mean Native American.
>
> > > Even considering how all of that is skewed
> and
> > > accepting the 64% number, that still would be
> > > lower than expected for whites based on their
> > > representation in the population.
>
> And five time higher than for the next largest
> racial group.
>
> > No, mass shootings (even as defined by Mother
> > Jones) are not a "white thing." In fact,
> > there simply are just many more white men in
> the
> > population. Based on their numbers, they
> actually
> > are less than might be expected given their
> > numbers.
>
> This is perhaps the dumbest thing I've ever read.
>
> When a mass shooting occurs, the perp is five
> times more likely to be a white male than a male
> of any other race. So, yes, mass shootings are a
> white man's thing.


Only because you're an idiot and don't understand how basic statistics work or how to interpret them. And no, it's not 5X. You fucked that up too. lol

Had you read the article posted then you'd see that CNN notes the same "dumb" thing.

Quote

"If you look at the whole list, it turns out that whites and blacks are pretty proportionate to their population, very close," said Dave Cullen, author of the book "Columbine," which tells the story of the 1999 massacre at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado. Harris and Klebold, the shooters there, were white.
Historically, Latinos and Asians have been the exception.

The Virginia Tech massacre was carried out by Seung-Hui Cho, who was born in South Korea.

"Latinos are almost nowhere to be seen," Cullen told CNN's "New Day." "Asians continue to be heavily overrepresented -- more than 2½ times their size in the population."

Whites make up about 63% of the U.S. population, blacks 13%, and Asians 5%, according to the latest census numbers. Latinos account for some 17% of the total population.

Given that much of the date range is prior to more recent large increases in minority population and more recent events involve more minorities, it's even more heavily skewed.

In fact, looking at the list quickly I expect that if I really wanted to I very likely could show a correlation between an increase in the minority population and "mass shootings."

Fatcts indeed Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fatcts, facts, facts Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > So, yes, mass shootings are
> a
> > white man's thing.
>
> Patently false. They don't count nigs killing
> other nigs in the statistics. Case and point, any
> Saturday night in Chicago.

This discussion regards only mass shootings, knucklehead, as defined earlier in the thread. The type of gun violence you describe is specifically excluded.

Yes, facts indeed Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fatcts indeed Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Fatcts, facts, facts Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > So, yes, mass shootings are
> > a
> > > white man's thing.
> >
> > Patently false. They don't count nigs killing
> > other nigs in the statistics. Case and point,
> any
> > Saturday night in Chicago.
>
> This discussion regards only mass shootings,
> knucklehead, as defined earlier in the thread. The
> type of gun violence you describe is specifically
> excluded.


Of course it is. mass shootings of people standing on the streets in Chicago every Saturday night that involve nigs shooting nigs is conveniently left out. So it's only a 'white man's thing' when you leave out any numbers that prove otherwise. You knucklehead you.

Stupid Libtard Tricks Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> [You] don't understand how basic statistics work
> or how to interpret them. And no, it's not 5X.

You're obviously an expert statistician, so please, explain to me how 'basic statistics' work and how to interpret them.

Obviously, your refusal to do so will demonstrate that you're a mouthy know-nothing asshole. lol.

> Given that much of the date range is prior to more
> recent large increases in minority population and
> more recent events involve more minorities, it's
> even more heavily skewed.
>
> In fact, looking at the list quickly I expect that
> if I really wanted to I very likely could show a
> correlation between an increase in the minority
> population and "mass shootings."

You know, I doubt that very much. But hey, why don't you give it a shot and let me know what you come up with.

Same caveat as above. lol.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> First thing is first. Donald Trump needs to be
> able to say the words radical Christian
> terrorism.
>
> Say the words faggot.
>
> Second. I want every Trumptard on here to condemn
> the actions of this fellow old Tennessee white
> male Christian probably Trumptard or be considered
> condoning terror.

Gerry you usually post a lot of shit that is pretty stupid but this is funny as shit. Thanks for the yuck.

Nip

Not facts, you wrote fatcts Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Of course it is. mass shootings of people
> standing on the streets in Chicago every Saturday
> night that involve nigs shooting nigs is
> conveniently left out. So it's only a 'white
> man's thing' when you leave out any numbers that
> prove otherwise.

Weekend Chicago street violence is part of a different conversation.

Go on home, Sonny, the grown-ups are talking here. lol

NippleChuck Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > First thing is first. Donald Trump needs to be
> > able to say the words radical Christian
> > terrorism.
> >
> > Say the words faggot.
> >
> > Second. I want every Trumptard on here to
> condemn
> > the actions of this fellow old Tennessee white
> > male Christian probably Trumptard or be
> considered
> > condoning terror.
>
> Gerry you usually post a lot of shit that is
> pretty stupid but this is funny as shit. Thanks
> for the yuck.
>
> Nip


Wrong again dad. This was stupid as well.

Yes, facts indeed. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not facts, you wrote fatcts Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Of course it is. mass shootings of people
> > standing on the streets in Chicago every
> Saturday
> > night that involve nigs shooting nigs is
> > conveniently left out. So it's only a 'white
> > man's thing' when you leave out any numbers
> that
> > prove otherwise.
>
> Weekend Chicago street violence is part of a
> different conversation.
>
> Go on home, Sonny, the grown-ups are talking here.
> lol


Why do you always write 'lol' after every one of your lame posts. Are you retarded or something. It's not funny in the least.

Yes, facts indeed Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fatcts indeed Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Fatcts, facts, facts Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > So, yes, mass shootings are
> > a
> > > white man's thing.
> >
> > Patently false. They don't count nigs killing
> > other nigs in the statistics. Case and point,
> any
> > Saturday night in Chicago.
>
> This discussion regards only mass shootings,
> knucklehead, as defined earlier in the thread. The
> type of gun violence you describe is specifically
> excluded.


Yes, that's called selection bias.

Len Bias Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > This discussion regards only mass shootings,
> > knucklehead, as defined earlier in the thread.
> The
> > type of gun violence you describe is
> specifically
> > excluded.
>
> Yes, that's called selection bias.

Yeah, not so much. Weekend Chicago street violence is part of a different conversation. But thanks for you contribution anyway. lol.

Facts, facts, facts Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Stupid Libtard Tricks Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > [You] don't understand how basic statistics
> work
> > or how to interpret them. And no, it's not 5X.
>
> You're obviously an expert statistician, so
> please, explain to me how 'basic statistics' work
> and how to interpret them.
>
> Obviously, your refusal to do so will demonstrate
> that you're a mouthy know-nothing asshole. lol.
>
> > Given that much of the date range is prior to
> more
> > recent large increases in minority population
> and
> > more recent events involve more minorities,
> it's
> > even more heavily skewed.
> >
> > In fact, looking at the list quickly I expect
> that
> > if I really wanted to I very likely could show
> a
> > correlation between an increase in the minority
> > population and "mass shootings."
>
> You know, I doubt that very much. But hey, why
> don't you give it a shot and let me know what you
> come up with.
>
> Same caveat as above. lol.


You don't have to be an 'expert' You just need to understand at a very basic level that the base of possibilities for something happening in a particular way is directly influenced by the basic probabilities as they exist in the data set independent of anything else.

Said in a more simple way for your simple mind, if 60% or the cars on the road are white, then there will be, independent of anything else, a roughly 60% probability that at any given time 60% of the cars that pass some point will be white. The only time that there is some aspect of interest in such a pattern is when things deviate from that expected representation. Whites and blacks (at least given the definition used), appear in "mass shooting" stats roughly as one would expect given their numbers in the population. Hispanics are significantly under-represented. Asians are greatly over-represented.

If you don't understand that then you're just too stupid to even continue to argue with. In that case, you also necessarily must believe that because 60% of smart people are white (or whatever other positive aspect you may want to assign), that then means that whites are "5X" smarter than any other minority group and being smart is a "white man's thing."

Yes, facts indeed Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Len Bias Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > This discussion regards only mass shootings,
> > > knucklehead, as defined earlier in the
> thread.
> > The
> > > type of gun violence you describe is
> > specifically
> > > excluded.
> >
> > Yes, that's called selection bias.
>
> Yeah, not so much. Weekend Chicago street violence
> is part of a different conversation. But thanks
> for you contribution anyway. lol.


Only because you/they've arbitrarily decided so in their definition of "mass shooting" as they have for various other aspects.

Stuck in traffic. Wait until i get home. Everyone gets a spankin.

FrankR. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not only was he wrong (as always) but Gerryfagtard
> now refuses to admit it. You shut YOUR
> cockholster, cucktard.

God you fuckers are so pathetic to just flat out lie. The guy was a christian pastor who specifically was motivated by right wing garbage. Own it faggots.

Why does Gerry have so much anger. Do we think it makes him feel better to vent in these pointless forums? Does it give him a power trip? I don't know, I'm not sure we will ever know.

Along with the Trumptards, he is a prime expample of why this country is headed downhill. He can't have a rational conversation (not like this is the site to even attempt that), just like the trumptards he doesn't accept others points of view. The list goes on and on.

faggots want revisionist history Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FrankR. Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Not only was he wrong (as always) but
> Gerryfagtard
> > now refuses to admit it. You shut YOUR
> > cockholster, cucktard.
>
> God you fuckers are so pathetic to just flat out
> lie. The guy was a christian pastor who
> specifically was motivated by right wing garbage.
> Own it faggots.

You fucking retarded faggot fuck. He wanted $15 minimum wage. He is a Berntard through and through. And black. And YOU are still a retarded fucking faggot. Own it.

kewal paudel Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why does Gerry have so much anger. Do we think it
> makes him feel better to vent in these pointless
> forums? Does it give him a power trip? I don't
> know, I'm not sure we will ever know.
>
> Along with the Trumptards, he is a prime expample
> of why this country is headed downhill. He can't
> have a rational conversation (not like this is the
> site to even attempt that), just like the
> trumptards he doesn't accept others points of
> view.

You would be mad too if you had no dick and knew you'd be dead soon.

kewal paudel Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why does Gerry have so much anger. Do we think it
> makes him feel better to vent in these pointless
> forums? Does it give him a power trip? I don't
> know, I'm not sure we will ever know.
>
> Along with the Trumptards, he is a prime expample
> of why this country is headed downhill. He can't
> have a rational conversation (not like this is the
> site to even attempt that), just like the
> trumptards he doesn't accept others points of
> view. The list goes on and on.

Your desperation is showing. You rightards are morons. I have nothing to do with that.

You do t get the last word on this. You failed. Own it.

Stupid Libtard Tricks Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If 60% or the cars on the road are white, then there
> will be, independent of anything else, a roughly
> 60% probability that at any given time 60% of the
> cars that pass some point will be white.

So applying this analogy of yours to mass shootings: If 64% of mass shooters over the past 34 years were white males, then there is a 64% probability that the next mass shooter will be a white male. If 16% of mass shooters over the past 34 years were black, then there is a 16% probability that the next mass shooter will be black. If 9% of mass shooters over the past 34 years were Asian, then there is a 9% probability that the next mass shooter will be Asian.

So, there is a 64% probability that the next US mass shooter will be a white male. And, in fact, it is four times more likely that the next US mass shooter will be a white male than black, and it is a little over seven times more likely that the next US mass shooter will be a white male than Asian.

Meaning that US mass shootings are, by a wide margin, more likely to be a white man's thing.

Thanks for clearing that up for me.

so dude is still a $15 minimum libtard extremist. interesting...

aaaaaaaannnnnddddd..... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> so dude is still a $15 minimum libtard extremist.

Nope.

Larry Dawson, male [patriarchal oppressor, heck]

66 years old [oldster, check]

Christian [intolerant bible-thumper, check]

Self proclaimed "prophet of God." [mentally deranged bible-thumper, check]

Yep, Uncle Larry checks all of the conserva-tard boxes!

Conserva-tards!

LoLz!

~~ 'Prophet of God', that's conserva-tard for "Allahu Akbar" ~~

Facts, facts, facts Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Stupid Libtard Tricks Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > If 60% or the cars on the road are white, then
> there
> > will be, independent of anything else, a
> roughly
> > 60% probability that at any given time 60% of
> the
> > cars that pass some point will be white.
>
> So applying this analogy of yours to mass
> shootings: If 64% of mass shooters over the past
> 34 years were white males, then there is a 64%
> probability that the next mass shooter will be a
> white male. If 16% of mass shooters over the past
> 34 years were black, then there is a 16%
> probability that the next mass shooter will be
> black. If 9% of mass shooters over the past 34
> years were Asian, then there is a 9% probability
> that the next mass shooter will be Asian.
>
> So, there is a 64% probability that the next US
> mass shooter will be a white male. And, in fact,
> it is four times more likely that the next US mass
> shooter will be a white male than black, and it is
> a little over seven times more likely that the
> next US mass shooter will be a white male than
> Asian.
>
> Meaning that US mass shootings are, by a wide
> margin, more likely to be a white man's thing.
>
> Thanks for clearing that up for me.


Christ. You really are a moron. I guess that you don't have to take stats or do any sort of critical analysis as a gender studies major.

The number is higher solely because of the number of whites in the population, not because mass shootings are a "white man's thing." As noted in the CNN article, the numbers are roughly in line with the population for whites and blacks. That is, the relative likelihood of any given white or black male being a mass shooter is roughly the same on a relative basis as the numbers of white/black men with dicks. i.e., The *rate* is roughly the same as their relative numbers or N * 1.

In contrast, for Hispanics, the rate is N * 0.5 (or whatever the actual number is). Much lower than their numbers in the population so one can validly say that "mass shootings" are much less of a "Hispanic thing."

For Asians, the rate is N * 2.5. For any given Asian, the expectation for any one of them going off would be 2.5X that of whites/blacks and far higher than Hispanics.

So mass shootings (as defined) are far more of an "Asian thing."

Conserva-tards! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> aaaaaaaannnnnddddd..... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > so dude is still a $15 minimum libtard
> extremist.
>
> Nope.
>
> Larry Dawson, male [patriarchal oppressor,
> heck]
>
> 66 years old [oldster, check]
>
> Christian [intolerant bible-thumper,
> check]
>
> Self proclaimed "prophet of God." [mentally
> deranged bible-thumper, check]
>
> Yep, Uncle Larry checks all of the conserva-tard
> boxes!
>
> Conserva-tards!
>
> LoLz!
>
> ~~ 'Prophet of God', that's conserva-tard for
> "Allahu Akbar" ~~




LoLz!

$7.25 to $15, that's more than double. no sane person could advocate for that. that definitely rules him out as a conservative and places him firmly in the delusional libtard camp. more violence from the bern-tard extremists. we can expect more of this, I'm afraid. bernout voters are steadily moving from terrorist supporters to terrorist activists.

This has been settled by Conservatardz. Lets not get repetitive after you rightards have lost the argument

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This has been settled by Conservatardz. Lets not
> get repetitive after you rightards have lost the
> argument





LoLz!

hmmm, looks like conservatard is the one simply copy/pasting the same response each time. Gerry would prefer you not be so repetitive, mkay?

Its settled. Stop repeating yourself you dumb Trumptards. The facts are the facts. You were wrong, move on.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Its settled. Stop repeating yourself you dumb
> Trumptards. The facts are the facts. You were
> wrong, move on.


Oh we're a longgg way from over showing what a complete fucktard fail that one was Gerr.




lol!

Christian extremist from the south. He is right out of the terror culture.