HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Off-Topic :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: Hollywood Swinger ()
Date: March 15, 2016 09:01PM

As it stands now with about equal percentages of the vote reported:

FL - Those voting Republican outnumber Dems by about 25% at 2 million to 1.5 million.

OH - Those voting Republican outnumber Dem voters by about 1/3 at 320,000 to 220,000.

Trump basically ties with Hillary in votes even with 3 others in the race.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: Gerrymanderer2 ()
Date: March 15, 2016 09:03PM

lol, dumb rightard. Hillary Clinton won more votes than anyone in Ohio, including its sitting governor.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: Gerrymanderer2 ()
Date: March 15, 2016 09:05PM

Hillary has the most votes of any candidate thus far. She is whooping Trump in overall votes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: Hollywood Swinger ()
Date: March 15, 2016 09:11PM

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> lol, dumb rightard. Hillary Clinton won more
> votes than anyone in Ohio, including its sitting
> governor.

Only by trivial numbers.

The total Republican/Dem split is much larger. Much easier for Trump to pick up more out of the difference among candidates than it is for Hillary.

Clinton 150,631
Sanders 81,504
Total 232,135


Kasich 144,044
Trump 115,143
Cruz 50,045
Rubio 17,223
Total 326,455

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: Gerrymanderer2 ()
Date: March 15, 2016 09:14PM

The votes are still coming in idiot and the Democratic race had way less percentage reported at that point when the numbers were close. Based on the percentage in Hillary trounced Kasich.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: Gerrymanderer2 ()
Date: March 15, 2016 09:15PM

Ohio is fucking scary man. Ohio is hell bent on fucking you rightards over man. Ouch... That's the state you don't want these numbers in. Horrible news for you guys.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: Craven Moorehead ()
Date: March 15, 2016 09:15PM

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> lol, dumb rightard. Hillary Clinton won more
> votes than anyone in Ohio, including its sitting
> governor.


Are you smoking nutmeg again? I warned you about that.


President (at-large) Summary Results

President (at-large) (D)

Candidate Votes % of Votes
Hillary Clinton (D) 224,287
60.34%
Roque "Rocky" De La Fuente (D) 4,744
1.28%
Bernie Sanders (D) 142,647
38.38%
Total Votes Cast 371,678



President (at-large) (R)

Candidate Votes % of Votes
Jeb Bush (R) 2,425
0.41%
Ben Carson (R) 6,002
1.01%
Chris Christie (R) 912
0.15%
Ted Cruz (R) 87,352
14.64%
Carly Fiorina (R) 725
0.12%
Mike Huckabee (R) 1,874
0.31%
John R. Kasich (R) 258,232
43.29%
Marco Rubio (R) 21,781
3.65%
Rick Santorum (R) 502
0.08%
Donald J. Trump (R) 216,704
36.33%
Total Votes Cast 596,509

https://vote.ohio.gov/

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: sdjerheruj ()
Date: March 15, 2016 09:16PM

GerryTard swings and misses...again

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: Hollywood Swinger ()
Date: March 15, 2016 09:16PM

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The votes are still coming in idiot and the
> Democratic race had way less percentage reported
> at that point when the numbers were close. Based
> on the percentage in Hillary trounced Kasich.


Duh. I noted with roughly equal percentages of the vote in for both parties.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: gerry shoots and misses ()
Date: March 15, 2016 09:19PM

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ohio is fucking scary man. Ohio is hell bent on
> fucking you rightards over man. Ouch... That's
> the state you don't want these numbers in.
> Horrible news for you guys.
Attachments:
airball gerrytard.gif

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: #blacklulzmatter ()
Date: March 15, 2016 09:20PM

Idiot is "protesting" at Kasich's speech now. lmao

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: Gerrymanderer2 ()
Date: March 15, 2016 09:21PM

Vote counted you God forsaken moron. Democratic vote hasnt reported.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: Hollywood Swinger ()
Date: March 15, 2016 09:24PM

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Vote counted you God forsaken moron. Democratic
> vote hasnt reported.


Neither has been officially reported you fucking idiot.

The numbers above were with 23% reported for Republicans and 24% reported for Dems.

Where the fuck do you think that I got the numbers if they weren't reported? lol

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: Craven Moorehead ()
Date: March 15, 2016 09:24PM

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Vote counted you God forsaken moron. Democratic
> vote hasnt reported.


.
Attachments:
b7cb11b1c07d55e2165046959098156a.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: Gerrydouche666 ()
Date: March 15, 2016 09:45PM

Suck a monkey cock, Gerry..


AH04u.gif

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: let trump cuck laugh ()
Date: March 15, 2016 10:03PM

He's a fuckin moron. He's handing us the supreme court for a generation and the senate and the presidency and he doesn't get it. Trump will not win in this electoral college. If he was running for president of the shitty stain south then he'd crush, but unfortunately for these rednecks, there's all these other states.

If you think Trump is going to win in a general in Ohio, Colorado, Virginia, and Pennsylvania, ---- or take both California and Florida, then you are a fucking rube. He may take Virginia, he may even take colorado, although they have a big hispanic vote, but Ohio and Pennsylvania will never vote for trump.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: News Stories of September ()
Date: March 15, 2016 10:06PM

Britain assures Sanctions If Trump Is Elected

Jordan and Turkey Demand US Bases and Operations Close If Trump Is Elected

When Parliament votes to denounce Donald Trump, you think that will play well in his presidentials? When no country allows him to visit to look presidential, will that be a good thing for him?

Can't wait for his VP pick, that's gonna be a fuckin hoot.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: Gerrymanderer2 ()
Date: March 15, 2016 10:08PM

Trump is gonna get stomped in Virginia. Northern Virgina suburbs lead all other suburbs in which Republican despise Trump.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: Gerrymanderer2 ()
Date: March 15, 2016 10:10PM

He has no advisers. He has no cabinet. He has three people managing his campaign lol. Its extraordinary. Hes gonna pick some nyc fast talking slicksters as secretary of defense lol.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: NJ76L ()
Date: March 15, 2016 10:11PM

let trump cuck laugh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He's a fuckin moron. He's handing us the supreme
> court for a generation and the senate and the
> presidency and he doesn't get it. Trump will not
> win in this electoral college. If he was running
> for president of the shitty stain south then he'd
> crush, but unfortunately for these rednecks,
> there's all these other states.
>
> If you think Trump is going to win in a general in
> Ohio, Colorado, Virginia, and Pennsylvania, ----
> or take both California and Florida, then you are
> a fucking rube. He may take Virginia, he may even
> take colorado, although they have a big hispanic
> vote, but Ohio and Pennsylvania will never vote
> for trump.


Uh, Republican turnout in FL and OH just trounced the Democrats. Trump in second place has more votes than Hillary in OH. Head-to-head in FL he tied even with 3 other candidates in the race.

If Republicans win OH and FL, they win. Period.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: Riette Daw ()
Date: March 15, 2016 10:11PM

That's good idea.




_______
GIRLvow shop

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: primary vote dweeb ()
Date: March 15, 2016 10:16PM

NJ76L Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> let trump cuck laugh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > He's a fuckin moron. He's handing us the
> supreme
> > court for a generation and the senate and the
> > presidency and he doesn't get it. Trump will
> not
> > win in this electoral college. If he was
> running
> > for president of the shitty stain south then
> he'd
> > crush, but unfortunately for these rednecks,
> > there's all these other states.
> >
> > If you think Trump is going to win in a general
> in
> > Ohio, Colorado, Virginia, and Pennsylvania,
> ----
> > or take both California and Florida, then you
> are
> > a fucking rube. He may take Virginia, he may
> even
> > take colorado, although they have a big
> hispanic
> > vote, but Ohio and Pennsylvania will never vote
> > for trump.
>
>
> Uh, Republican turnout in FL and OH just trounced
> the Democrats. Trump in second place has more
> votes than Hillary in OH. Head-to-head in FL he
> tied even with 3 other candidates in the race.
>
> If Republicans win OH and FL, they win. Period.


False, if a republican wins Ohio, Florida, and Pennsylvania they win, or if they substitute Florida with Colorado and Virginia. You are a fucking idiot.

If your point is that Ohio and Florida going to a republican is a bell weather that the other necessary states will also go then sure, but electorally, you have an uphill battle and your candidate is fucking stupid. He's done good in bringing out all the rednecks though, congratulations on that.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: pea brain republicans ()
Date: March 15, 2016 10:23PM

NJ76L Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> let trump cuck laugh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > He's a fuckin moron. He's handing us the
> supreme
> > court for a generation and the senate and the
> > presidency and he doesn't get it. Trump will
> not
> > win in this electoral college. If he was
> running
> > for president of the shitty stain south then
> he'd
> > crush, but unfortunately for these rednecks,
> > there's all these other states.
> >
> > If you think Trump is going to win in a general
> in
> > Ohio, Colorado, Virginia, and Pennsylvania,
> ----
> > or take both California and Florida, then you
> are
> > a fucking rube. He may take Virginia, he may
> even
> > take colorado, although they have a big
> hispanic
> > vote, but Ohio and Pennsylvania will never vote
> > for trump.
>
>
> Uh, Republican turnout in FL and OH just trounced
> the Democrats. Trump in second place has more
> votes than Hillary in OH.
Head-to-head in FL he
> tied even with 3 other candidates in the race.
>
> If Republicans win OH and FL, they win. Period.


God you are fucking dumb, you are looking at results with 49% in on the D side and 68% in on R

God damn you are fucking stupid

extrapolating that to have even percentage in

Hillary has 442,173 with 49% in
Trump has 504,925 with 68% in

So equalized that would mean hillary would have 902,393 votes, Trump would have 742,536

In other words he gets trounced. It's not shocking that an idiot trump hump would be so bad at math. Here's the truth douchebag, the government isn't why your life sucks, your little pea brain is.


One electorate that Trump will win in November will be voters without a college education, which he dominates in the polls.

Is a College Graduate for Trump : 31%, Is not a College Graduate for trump : 44%

Hillary

Is a college graduate for hillary : 55%, is not a college graduate for hillary : 52%

How come college graduates hate trump? lol

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: jjPmp ()
Date: March 15, 2016 10:23PM

primary vote dweeb Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> NJ76L Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > let trump cuck laugh Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > He's a fuckin moron. He's handing us the
> > supreme
> > > court for a generation and the senate and the
> > > presidency and he doesn't get it. Trump will
> > not
> > > win in this electoral college. If he was
> > running
> > > for president of the shitty stain south then
> > he'd
> > > crush, but unfortunately for these rednecks,
> > > there's all these other states.
> > >
> > > If you think Trump is going to win in a
> general
> > in
> > > Ohio, Colorado, Virginia, and Pennsylvania,
> > ----
> > > or take both California and Florida, then you
> > are
> > > a fucking rube. He may take Virginia, he may
> > even
> > > take colorado, although they have a big
> > hispanic
> > > vote, but Ohio and Pennsylvania will never
> vote
> > > for trump.
> >
> >
> > Uh, Republican turnout in FL and OH just
> trounced
> > the Democrats. Trump in second place has more
> > votes than Hillary in OH. Head-to-head in FL
> he
> > tied even with 3 other candidates in the race.
> >
> > If Republicans win OH and FL, they win.
> Period.
>
>
> False, if a republican wins Ohio, Florida, and
> Pennsylvania they win, or if they substitute
> Florida with Colorado and Virginia. You are a
> fucking idiot.
>
> If your point is that Ohio and Florida going to a
> republican is a bell weather that the other
> necessary states will also go then sure, but
> electorally, you have an uphill battle and your
> candidate is fucking stupid. He's done good in
> bringing out all the rednecks though,
> congratulations on that.


Wrong. The only thing that counts are swing states.

FL 29
OH 18
Total 47

VA 13
CO 9
Total 22

PA is 20 but usually already is counted for Dems. Though Hillary just helped put it in play with he stupid comment about shutting down coal yesterday.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: UN3uc ()
Date: March 15, 2016 10:29PM

pea brain republicans Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> NJ76L Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > let trump cuck laugh Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > He's a fuckin moron. He's handing us the
> > supreme
> > > court for a generation and the senate and the
> > > presidency and he doesn't get it. Trump will
> > not
> > > win in this electoral college. If he was
> > running
> > > for president of the shitty stain south then
> > he'd
> > > crush, but unfortunately for these rednecks,
> > > there's all these other states.
> > >
> > > If you think Trump is going to win in a
> general
> > in
> > > Ohio, Colorado, Virginia, and Pennsylvania,
> > ----
> > > or take both California and Florida, then you
> > are
> > > a fucking rube. He may take Virginia, he may
> > even
> > > take colorado, although they have a big
> > hispanic
> > > vote, but Ohio and Pennsylvania will never
> vote
> > > for trump.
> >
> >
> > Uh, Republican turnout in FL and OH just
> trounced
> > the Democrats. Trump in second place has
> more
> > votes than Hillary in OH.
Head-to-head in
> FL he
> > tied even with 3 other candidates in the race.
> >
> > If Republicans win OH and FL, they win.
> Period.
>
>
> God you are fucking dumb, you are looking at
> results with 49% in on the D side and 68% in on R
>
> God damn you are fucking stupid
>
> extrapolating that to have even percentage in
>
> Hillary has 442,173 with 49% in
> Trump has 504,925 with 68% in
>
> So equalized that would mean hillary would have
> 902,393 votes, Trump would have 742,536
>
> In other words he gets trounced. It's not shocking
> that an idiot trump hump would be so bad at math.
> Here's the truth douchebag, the government isn't
> why your life sucks, your little pea brain is.
>
>
> One electorate that Trump will win in November
> will be voters without a college education, which
> he dominates in the polls.
>
> Is a College Graduate for Trump : 31%, Is not a
> College Graduate for trump : 44%
>
> Hillary
>
> Is a college graduate for hillary : 55%, is not a
> college graduate for hillary : 52%
>
> How come college graduates hate trump? lol


Wrong. I counted votes with equal percentages of the vote in and it's just gotten worse from there.

And again there are 5+ candidates to 2 on the Dem side so pulling Trump out alone isn't a valid direct comparison.

Apparently you aren't one of those college graduates. lol

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: Gerrymanderer2 ()
Date: March 15, 2016 10:35PM

Dont mind the rightards. Its like debating a middle schooler. Never give them more credit than a middle schooler.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: 6Xh4G ()
Date: March 15, 2016 10:54PM

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dont mind the rightards. Its like debating a
> middle schooler. Never give them more credit than
> a middle schooler.


Have you gone to look at the results again lately masterbater?

Hint: It's not gotten any better.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: Gerrymanderer2 ()
Date: March 15, 2016 10:58PM

Hillary Clinton has gotten the most votes in florida with ohio still out.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/15/2016 10:59PM by Gerrymanderer2.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: 3UG3y ()
Date: March 15, 2016 11:06PM

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hillary Clinton has gotten the most votes in
> florida with ohio still out.


She's leading by < 20K votes with one other candidate for a total poll on the Dem side of ~1.5 million Dem votes.

Trump has 5 other candidates and a total pool of ~2.5 million Republican votes.

Ohio isn't even close. Even in second place Trump likely will beat her straight up not even considering extra candidates.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: Gerrymanderer2 ()
Date: March 15, 2016 11:09PM

Florida is a better metric than ohio because its a closed primary. Florida is a four man race but Trump has been the presumptive nominee Hillary hasnt as it relates to the pledged delegate math.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: ChEU4 ()
Date: March 15, 2016 11:14PM

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Florida is a better metric than ohio because its a
> closed primary. Florida is a four man race but
> Trump has been the presumptive nominee Hillary
> hasnt as it relates to the pledged delegate math.


WTF are you babbling about?

You think that Trump is the "presumptive nominee" and Hillary isn't?

Jesus F'ing Christ you're digging deep in the bullshit pile tonight. lol

Either way, Dems lose.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: Gerrymanderer2 ()
Date: March 15, 2016 11:17PM

She wasnt. She moved her campaign twice and retreated to florida tonight. She was prepared to lose Ohio and Illinois. Trump is way more dominant in the Republican primary than she has been on the Democratic side. That ended tonight though.

Ohio ended the race.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: 67bEE ()
Date: March 15, 2016 11:33PM

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> She wasnt. She moved her campaign twice and
> retreated to florida tonight. She was prepared to
> lose Ohio and Illinois. Trump is way more dominant
> in the Republican primary than she has been on the
> Democratic side. That ended tonight though.
>
> Ohio ended the race.



Right. Clinton hasn't been the presumptive Dem nominee only since like 2009. lol

You're completely fucking delusional.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: k6uMH ()
Date: March 16, 2016 12:12AM

What excuses are you going to try to use now?

Ohio

Democratic 96.5% Reporting
Delegates Allocated: 127/159
Winner H. Clinton 56.5% 650,769 88
B. Sanders 42.8% 492,871 39
R. De La Fuente 0.8% 9,091


Republican 97.9% Reporting
Delegates Allocated: 66/66
Winner J. Kasich 46.9% 928,255 66
D. Trump 36.0% 712,470
T. Cruz 13.2% 262,003
M. Rubio 2.3% 46,424
B. Carson 0.7% 14,605
J. Bush 0.3% 5,507

Updated: 3/16/16 12:06 AM ET | Source: AP

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: for fuck sake Gerry ()
Date: March 16, 2016 12:22AM

Clinton has been the de facto nominee all along.
All the neocontardz talk about is 'Who can beat Hillary?'.

During any debate, did any of them even mention beating Sanders?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: 2016 not looking good for Demtards in crucial swing states
Posted by: Feal da byrn ()
Date: March 16, 2016 09:48AM

No, because there's a high likelihood he could croak before the convention.
Attachments:
bernie-2016.png

Options: ReplyQuote


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **  ********   ******         **  **      ** 
 **     **  **        **    **        **  **  **  ** 
 **     **  **        **              **  **  **  ** 
 *********  ******    **              **  **  **  ** 
 **     **  **        **        **    **  **  **  ** 
 **     **  **        **    **  **    **  **  **  ** 
 **     **  ********   ******    ******    ***  ***  
This forum powered by Phorum.