Re: How many can you find? new
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: June 28, 2009 03:02AM


Nope. I'm right. I used to be in the Seals with Spunky's husband.

-----------------------------------
I don't know, but it's been said, "You do or don't, and then you're dead."


Options: Reply•Quote•PM•Subscribe to Thread•Report
Re: How many can you find? new
Posted by: Thurston Moore ()
Date: June 28, 2009 03:10AM


MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nope. I'm right. I used to be in the Seals with
> Spunky's husband.



NOTICE THE IMPROPER USE OF "USED" ABOVE. I HAVE NOTICED IT THROUGH OUT
MANY POSTS OF OTHERS: FURFUR, SPUNKY IS A TOOL, FAIRFAXDUDE AND MANY OTHERS LIKE THE ONE BELOW BY THURSTON MOORE.


I thought Spunky was a guy??

Well shit, if you used to be in the seals, then I'm sure you can't be wrong.

I definitely stand corrected.

If I post a photo of Waikiki later, will you be able to find where the navy seals have hidden themselves? I'll give you a hint, they are sitting at the bar at the Hale Koa.


MESS NEVER WAS A SEAL AND NEITHER WAS MY X, HE NEVER WENT TO COMBAT, HE AVOIDED IT...TO CHICKEN.

MESS NEVER WAS A SEAL AND NEITHER WAS MY X, HE NEVER WENT TO COMBAT, HE AVOIDED IT...TO CHICKEN.

Grammar and spelling aren't your strong points are they?

MrMephisto is desperately trying to become one of the so called " Douchebags" that frequent this board, aka Gravis, Pgens, TheMeeper, Harry Tuttle, 496, the list goes on. They like to believe they are better then most people here, with their annoying sarcastic bullshit they have been spewing for years. They like to harass people and make jokes that nobody really finds funny. They also tend to think everyone but themselves are trolls, when in fact thats exactly what they are. I think by this point Memphisto has actually achieved this by being just another douche here.

spunky Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> NOTICE THE IMPROPER USE OF "USED" ABOVE. I HAVE
> NOTICED IT THROUGH OUT
> MANY POSTS OF OTHERS: FURFUR, SPUNKY IS A TOOL,
> FAIRFAXDUDE AND MANY OTHERS LIKE THE ONE BELOW BY
> THURSTON MOORE.
>
>

What is the proper use of "USED" then?

Because when somene used to be one thing but is now another thing, they generally say that they used to be that one thing.


http://www.learnenglish.de/grammar/usedtotext.htm

I thought I was Elliot?

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Thurston Moore Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> spunky Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > NOTICE THE IMPROPER USE OF "USED" ABOVE. I
> HAVE
> > NOTICED IT THROUGH OUT
> > MANY POSTS OF OTHERS: FURFUR, SPUNKY IS A TOOL,
> > FAIRFAXDUDE AND MANY OTHERS LIKE THE ONE BELOW
> BY
> > THURSTON MOORE.
> >
> >
>
> What is the proper use of "USED" then?
>
> Because when somene used to be one thing but is
> now another thing, they generally say that they
> used to be that one thing.
>
>
> http://www.learnenglish.de/grammar/usedtotext.htm


No past tense is needed, but I would expect you to ask...Mess, Harry Tuttle, 496 and the list goes on.

Well what do you expect Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> MrMephisto is desperately trying to become one of
> the so called " Douchebags" that frequent this
> board, aka Gravis, Pgens, TheMeeper, Harry Tuttle,
> 496, the list goes on. They like to believe they
> are better then most people here, with their
> annoying sarcastic bullshit they have been spewing
> for years. They like to harass people and make
> jokes that nobody really finds funny. They also
> tend to think everyone but themselves are trolls,
> when in fact thats exactly what they are. I think
> by this point Memphisto has actually achieved this
> by being just another douche here.


This never gets old.

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well what do you expect Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > MrMephisto is desperately trying to become one
> of
> > the so called " Douchebags" that frequent this
> > board, aka Gravis, Pgens, TheMeeper, Harry
> Tuttle,
> > 496, the list goes on. They like to believe
> they
> > are better then most people here, with their
> > annoying sarcastic bullshit they have been
> spewing
> > for years. They like to harass people and make
> > jokes that nobody really finds funny. They also
> > tend to think everyone but themselves are
> trolls,
> > when in fact thats exactly what they are. I
> think
> > by this point Memphisto has actually achieved
> this
> > by being just another douche here.
>
>
> This never gets old.

It was people like Gravis and rstidman and pgens that laid the groundwork for complete loser douchebags like Meeper and Mephisto. The sarcasm and crappy jokes here never get old.

-

-

edit by Cary: Account password compromised, disabled by administrator.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/01/2010 07:20AM by inkahootz.

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
>
> This never gets old.
Attachments:

So if Gravis, pgens, and all the other "regulars" aren't contributing anything, then let me ask you: What are you contributing?

Did you post a serious, informative thread and have it shit on by all of the "regulars?" Why do you feel as though it's your sacred duty to put us in our place?

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So if Gravis, pgens, and all the other "regulars"
> aren't contributing anything, then let me ask you:
> What are you contributing?
>
> Did you post a serious, informative thread and
> have it shit on by all of the "regulars?" Why do
> you feel as though it's your sacred duty to put us
> in our place?
Attachments:

Meeper means Shit in French Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It was people like Gravis and rstidman and pgens
> that laid the groundwork for complete loser
> douchebags like Meeper and Mephisto. The sarcasm
> and crappy jokes here never get old.


lol

Try again when you're less dumb.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Meeper means Shit in French Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > It was people like Gravis and rstidman and pgens that laid the groundwork for complete loser douchebags like Meeper and Mephisto. The sarcasm and crappy jokes here never get old.



Boy, well I sure am sorry for whatever I said that's giving you such a negative, pessimistic outlook on FU's off-topic forum. I'd really hate to be the one to antagonize unregistered people and stop them from coming on here to teach us all about how the forum works.

I'd just like to take a moment here and thank Pgens for laying the groundwork.



pgens Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Meeper means Shit in French Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > It was people like Gravis and rstidman and
> pgens
> > that laid the groundwork for complete loser
> > douchebags like Meeper and Mephisto. The
> sarcasm
> > and crappy jokes here never get old.
>
>
> lol

spunky Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> No past tense is needed, but I would expect you to
> ask...Mess, Harry Tuttle, 496 and the list goes
> on.

Would you please disclose your list to us? Oh and maybe a motive? Why would anyone want that many aliases to post on? Seriously, add the total number of messages posted by everyone on your list. How could one person do all that?
Attachments:

We are all MrMephisto.

You are so lame and STUPID!

WashingTone Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We are all MrMephisto.


I was just getting used to being Elliot.

Genevieve Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WashingTone Locian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > We are all MrMephisto.
>
>
> I was just getting used to being Elliot.



We are all MrMephisto when we aren't all Elliot.

What is the difference between a WashingToneLocian and a Wash(2)? Are you like the sequel to WashingTone?

FPF Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What is the difference between a WashingToneLocian
> and a Wash(2)? Are you like the sequel to
> WashingTone?


I'm the same guy.

Weird.

Please explain, spunky, what do you mean no past tense is needed? Right now I'm too lazy to actually look this up and it's very unimportant to me, but I fail to see how this particular piece of grammar, even if it is incorrect, constitutes as definitive proof.

I would say that the vernacular is to say 'used' in these sorts of situations.

Professor Pangloss Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Please explain, spunky, what do you mean no past
> tense is needed? Right now I'm too lazy to
> actually look this up and it's very unimportant to
> me, but I fail to see how this particular piece of
> grammar, even if it is incorrect, constitutes as
> definitive proof.
>
> I would say that the vernacular is to say 'used'
> in these sorts of situations.


Well, you would be wrong there Pang (Mess). As you have been before.

Ones writing style is unique and this proof is more then a coincidence, It's consistent with the writing style of Mess, or a foreigner to our language.

"They like to believe they are better then most people hereer than most people here, with their annoying sarcastic bullshit they have been spewing for years."

True that. I know I'm better than most people here, including you troll.

Ok, I read all the drivel above.

Tell me again why "I used to be in the Seals" is bad grammer?

Cause if that's bad grammer, well, then, life as we know it is over. Please pass the tin foil, Spunk-inator.

And INK-tard, if you're going to attempt to contribute, get the spelling right--I don't have a clue about French, and even I know "shit" in french is "merde", not "mearde", you fucking retard. GAWWWWD.

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.

f

edit by Cary: Account password compromised, disabled by administrator.



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 06/01/2010 05:47AM by inkahootz.

Good for you. On here you only speak DUMBASS.

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.

s

edit by Cary: Account password compromised, disabled by administrator.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 06/02/2010 01:02AM by inkahootz.

la spunk tiene un perro en sus ano ?que no? and i dont mean year. whats the big deal if they are all the same person? they're all still pedophiles even if its just one person. i guess i dont really see how it affects anyone. so carry on bieng bat shit crazy.
rock on

Paranoid much?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Being vague is almost as fun as that other thing.

Melissa Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Paranoid much?

spunky Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Professor Pangloss Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Please explain, spunky, what do you mean no
> past
> > tense is needed? Right now I'm too lazy to
> > actually look this up and it's very unimportant
> to
> > me, but I fail to see how this particular piece
> of
> > grammar, even if it is incorrect, constitutes
> as
> > definitive proof.
> >
> > I would say that the vernacular is to say
> 'used'
> > in these sorts of situations.
>
>
> Well, you would be wrong there Pang (Mess). As
> you have been before.
>
> Ones writing style is unique and this proof is
> more then a coincidence, It's consistent with the
> writing style of Mess, or a foreigner to our
> language.


If you had bothered to follow the link I posted earlier, you wouldn't be trying to incorrectly correct other people.

http://www.learnenglish.de/grammar/usedtotext.htm

"'Used to' or 'use to' vs would
I was asked on Pal Talk recently how to use used to and would.

If we say something used to happen we are talking about repeated events and actions in the past, usually things that happened a long time ago and are now finished.

To express this we can use either used to or would.

When I was young I used to play with my dolls. = When I was young I would play with my dolls.
Of course I no longer play with dolls!

We used to go out a lot in the summer.
Implies that we no longer go out much.

If you want to talk about repeated states or habits in the past, you must use used to, you cannot use would : :

My dog used to bark at cats.
I used to smoke.
I used to be an administrative assistant.
I used to live in England.
You should use 'use to' without a d in sentences when it follows 'did' or 'didn't' (don't worry too much about this because lots of people get it wrong).

The question form is ‘Did you use to…?'. When asking a closed question you put did/didn't in front of the subject followed by use to, you cannot use would.
"

Don't you mean MrMephisto is in front of a lot of posters taking it up the ass like the homo he is?

inkahootz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Addendum: In Spanish, shit is 'mearda';

I believe "shit" in spanish is "mierda". Though I'm sure you say it correctly. It doesn't really matter because most people from mexico can't read or write good.

s

edit by Cary: Account password compromised, disabled by administrator.



Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 06/02/2010 01:02AM by inkahootz.

inkahootz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> You are correct...my bad.

Hijo bro! I didn't mean to offend you. I just thought you'd like to know so you could apply that knowledge in the future, when it really counts.

> I am not Mexican,

It's all good, not everybody's perfect.

> and I
> think it is both hypocritical and ironic

I'm glad you get the joke.

> that you
> clown them when you don't even have a proper grasp
> of English grammar. Case in point: It is 'can't
> read or write well'. The use of 'good' is
> incorrect and makes you sound like a redneck.

Or maybe Derek Zoolander?


Edit: Changed "Nobody's perfect" to "Not everybody's perfect"



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/28/2009 11:56PM by Harry Tuttle.

you clowning on rednecks makes you sound like i stereotypical biggot. no offense but if you got offended it doesnt bother me

]



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/29/2012 02:29PM by Alias.

s

edit by Cary: Account password compromised, disabled by administrator.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 06/02/2010 01:01AM by inkahootz.

]



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/29/2012 02:28PM by Alias.

spunky Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Professor Pangloss Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> Well, you would be wrong there Pang (Mess). As
> you have been before.

Pang "(Mess)" ? Now you think I'm Mr Mephisto?

I've been wrong before, this is true, however if you are trying to insinuate that during our last conversation I was mistaken, well that remains to be seen.

> Ones writing style is unique and this proof is
> more then a coincidence, It's consistent with the
> writing style of Mess, or a foreigner to our
> language.

Yes, I am well aware that one's writing style is unique. I'm also aware of software that can be purchased to detect such things. However, I have to point out to you that such software and such analysis is not derived from a *SINGLE* word, but groups of words, paragraph structure, etc.

As an example, I typically begin a load of paragraphs (more then I should) with "in any event" (among other tells), I use 'eh' quite a lot, and I have a primary interest in certain subjects. If one were so inclined, one could easily find me on other message boards - however no one would ever be so inclined.

My overall point is that you analysis seems to consist of a word that I would say the majority of the population uses.

Professor Pangloss Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> spunky Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Professor Pangloss Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > Well, you would be wrong there Pang (Mess). As
> > you have been before.
>
> Pang "(Mess)" ? Now you think I'm Mr Mephisto?
>
> I've been wrong before, this is true, however if
> you are trying to insinuate that during our last
> conversation I was mistaken, well that remains to
> be seen.
>
> > Ones writing style is unique and this proof is
> > more then a coincidence, It's consistent with
> the
> > writing style of Mess, or a foreigner to our
> > language.
>
> Yes, I am well aware that one's writing style is
> unique. I'm also aware of software that can be
> purchased to detect such things. However, I have
> to point out to you that such software and such
> analysis is not derived from a *SINGLE* word, but
> groups of words, paragraph structure, etc.
>
> As an example, I typically begin a load of
> paragraphs (more then I should) with "in any
> event" (among other tells), I use 'eh' quite a
> lot, and I have a primary interest in certain
> subjects. If one were so inclined, one could
> easily find me on other message boards - however
> no one would ever be so inclined.
>
> My overall point is that you analysis seems to
> consist of a word that I would say the majority of
> the population uses.

You can't convince Spunky of anything, no matter how concrete your logic is, or how porous "hers" is. I've seen instances where "she" will be friendly with a poster, tell them how smart and cool they are, then turn around and accuse them of being, literally, every other person that posts on this site.

When pressed to name who that one person is, "she" will accuse them of being Elliot in the Morning.

It's funny like watching a dog chase a frisbee and accidentally run into a brick wall; you're like, "ha ha, that was so dumb." Then when you see the dog limping away, you feel really bad for it.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Ok, so what I gather from this thread is that Spunky used to be in the seals, Genevieve is NOT Elliot and the troll here is Derek Zoolander.

Man, I need another OxyContin.

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You can't convince Spunky of anything, no matter
> how concrete your logic is, or how porous "hers"
> is. I've seen instances where "she" will be
> friendly with a poster, tell them how smart and
> cool they are, then turn around and accuse them of
> being, literally, every other person that posts on
> this site.

I have noticed how...um...'unique' her logic is.

> When pressed to name who that one person is, "she"
> will accuse them of being Elliot in the Morning.

Ha! That's very odd! Why would anyone think that Elliot in the Morning would show up here?

> It's funny like watching a dog chase a frisbee and
> accidentally run into a brick wall; you're like,
> "ha ha, that was so dumb." Then when you see the
> dog limping away, you feel really bad for it.

True, but when you see the dog pick it's wounded body up, only to charge back into the wall you start thinking about medication for that dog...

Yeah. When talking to Spunky, keep in mind that this is the same person that once claimed to see Mohommad Atta at a US avy ceremony, saw 9/11 hijackers in Dave and Busters, claims that "she" knows for a fact that they make anthrax somewhere in Maryland, and says that the government has illegal immigrants sneak into "her" house to move stuff around.

Spunky is someone that either needs severe psychological help, or is just someone posing as this deranged persona.

This is why I only take "her" off of my ignore list when I need a laugh.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

OP wrote:
--------------------
>"MrMephisto is behind a lot of posters here..."

Wait. I'm confused.

Does this mean he prefers to attack from behind sexually or does he have other identities?

§ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> OP wrote:
> --------------------
> >"MrMephisto is behind a lot of posters here..."
>
> Wait. I'm confused.
>
> Does this mean he prefers to attack from behind
> sexually or does he have other identities?

She means the latter, but the reality is the former.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Aside from all the other deranged behavior and paranoid ideations, le Spunk is correct (sorta) about one thing.

Ft Detrick in Frederick is home to the Army's Medical Research Institute, and while it may be debateable whether they "make" anthrax, they certainly store it there, etc. Just a little factoid to brighten up yall's day.

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.

Hi my name is MrMesphisto and I like to suck dick, please call me anytime I also enjoy anal as I am one of the biggest assholes on this site! I am fat ugly and stupid as shit, but will let you nut all over my hairy face!

Thurston Moore Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> spunky Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Professor Pangloss Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Please explain, spunky, what do you mean no
> > past
> > > tense is needed? Right now I'm too lazy to
> > > actually look this up and it's very
> unimportant
> > to
> > > me, but I fail to see how this particular
> piece
> > of
> > > grammar, even if it is incorrect, constitutes
> > as
> > > definitive proof.
> > >
> > > I would say that the vernacular is to say
> > 'used'
> > > in these sorts of situations.
> >
> >
> > Well, you would be wrong there Pang (Mess). As
> > you have been before.
> >
> > Ones writing style is unique and this proof is
> > more then a coincidence, It's consistent with
> the
> > writing style of Mess, or a foreigner to our
> > language.
>
>
> If you had bothered to follow the link I posted
> earlier, you wouldn't be trying to incorrectly
> correct other people.
>
> http://www.learnenglish.de/grammar/usedtotext.htm
>
> "'Used to' or 'use to' vs would
> I was asked on Pal Talk recently how to use used
> to and would.
>
> If we say something used to happen we are talking
> about repeated events and actions in the past,
> usually things that happened a long time ago and
> are now finished.
>
> To express this we can use either used to or
> would.
>
> When I was young I used to play with my dolls. =
> When I was young I would play with my dolls.
> Of course I no longer play with dolls!
>
> We used to go out a lot in the summer.
> Implies that we no longer go out much.
>
> If you want to talk about repeated states or
> habits in the past, you must use used to, you
> cannot use would : :
>
> My dog used to bark at cats.
> I used to smoke.
> I used to be an administrative assistant.
> I used to live in England.
> You should use 'use to' without a d in sentences
>
when it follows 'did' or 'didn't' (don't worry too

This is wrong and you are blowin' it out your shorts. How does that feel?

It's 'use to' regardless of 'did or didn't' falling in a sentence or not. Just another imposter tryin' to help himself(Mess) out.

My the way there are no BIs, only true FAGS tryin' to stay in the closet.


> much about this because lots of people get it
> wrong).
>
> The question form is ‘Did you use to…?'. When
> asking a closed question you put did/didn't in
> front of the subject followed by use to, you
> cannot use would.
> "

MrMephisto is a POS Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi my name is MrMesphisto and I like to suck dick,
> please call me anytime I also enjoy anal as I am
> one of the biggest assholes on this site! I am
> fat ugly and stupid as shit, but will let you nut
> all over my hairy face!

This MrMesphisto guy sounds like a flaming homosexual. I also don't like how his username is so similar to mine; that might cause some confusion.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> MrMephisto is a POS Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Hi my name is MrMesphisto and I like to suck
> dick,
> > please call me anytime I also enjoy anal as I
> am
> > one of the biggest assholes on this site! I am
> > fat ugly and stupid as shit, but will let you
> nut
> > all over my hairy face!
>
> This MrMesphisto guy sounds like a flaming
> homosexual. I also don't like how his username is
> so similar to mine; that might cause some
> confusion.


yeah, I am sure it's you. After all, do you not suck peepee?

There's no doubt about who you are and how sick you can be. The disgusting pictures you sent me under the name of Furfur of 2 guys doin' it speaks volumes about your identity...FAG!

You are a sick example of a human being, more like an animal then a human.

By the way I'm right about a lot, and this is yet another example of your ignorance. Your effort to gain support through imposter postings under other names here is obvious and shows how pitiful you truly can be.

Despite your efforts you still and will always fall short, in the front and behind.

spunky Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There's no doubt about who you are and how sick
> you can be. The disgusting pictures you sent me
> under the name of Furfur of 2 guys doin' it speaks
> volumes about your identity...FAG!

Furfur sent you homo pics? That is WAY disgusting. What a queer!

fairfaxdude Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Aside from all the other deranged behavior and
> paranoid ideations, le Spunk is correct (sorta)
> about one thing.
>
> Ft Detrick in Frederick is home to the Army's
> Medical Research Institute, and while it may be
> debateable whether they "make" anthrax, they
> certainly store it there, etc. Just a little
> factoid to brighten up yall's day.

If you feel this way then why were you trying so desperately to meet me?

You sound wacko, with no true compass or truth to you...how sad.

Detrick is the only recognized faculty, Edgewood at Aberdeen made it also for years, that can be proven, along with most everything else. Except a dumbass will refute everything out of ignorance.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/29/2009 05:26PM by spunky.

I am sure I will regret this but...

Seriously spunk... if you have pets, do you check them constantly to see if they have been replaced with clones or robotic replicas to "keep an eye on you"? Or perhaps run sonic or air units at your doorways and open windows to make sure the nanobots don't get in? Maybe those devices they put in your pets to track them actually have listening devices built in so they can eavesdrop on their owners...

It seems like spunk will go for a while, commenting on other topics - then when she feels she isn't getting enough attention, she will pull out her "conspiracy theory" card and toss it on the table.

I sure hope you use pre-paid phones...

Everything is a conspiracy! I don't know what to believe!

__________________________________
That's not a ladybug, that's a cannapiller.

Spunky says that many of her bullshit crackpot theories can be proven, but any time someone asks her to prove it, she gives one of two answers:

1. You're an imposter, so I don't need to prove it to you, FAG.

2. I don't need to prove it, I know it's fact, and if you don't believe me, you can pound salt. FAG.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Spunky says that many of her bullshit crackpot
> theories can be proven, but any time someone asks
> her to prove it, she gives one of two answers:
>
> 1. You're an imposter, so I don't need to prove
> it to you, FAG.
>
> 2. I don't need to prove it, I know it's fact,
> and if you don't believe me, you can pound salt.
> FAG.

In her defense, Furfur DOES sound like a fag. I mean he sent pictures of dudes doing it. That is pretty gay. Don't you think?

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Spunky says that many of her bullshit crackpot
> theories can be proven, but any time someone asks
> her to prove it, she gives one of two answers:
>
> 1. You're an imposter, so I don't need to prove
> it to you, FAG.
>
> 2. I don't need to prove it, I know it's fact,
> and if you don't believe me, you can pound salt.
> FAG.



You're still a FAG!

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Spunky says that many of her bullshit crackpot
> theories can be proven, but any time someone asks
> her to prove it, she gives one of two answers:
>
> 1. You're an imposter, so I don't need to prove
> it to you, FAG.
>
> 2. I don't need to prove it, I know it's fact,
> and if you don't believe me, you can pound salt.
> FAG.


Why should I believe you? You could be Mohammed Atta posting from a automotive kiosk at Quantico just before your big party.

__________________________________
That's not a ladybug, that's a cannapiller.

father Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> MrMephisto Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Spunky says that many of her bullshit crackpot
> > theories can be proven, but any time someone
> asks
> > her to prove it, she gives one of two answers:
> >
> > 1. You're an imposter, so I don't need to
> prove
> > it to you, FAG.
> >
> > 2. I don't need to prove it, I know it's fact,
> > and if you don't believe me, you can pound salt.
>
> > FAG.
>
>
>
> You're still a FAG!

This is yet another fine example that depression hurts.

This poor troll is trying to thrive, yet FAILing miserably.

spunky Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There's no doubt about who you are and how sick
> you can be. The disgusting pictures you sent me
> under the name of Furfur of 2 guys doin' it speaks
> volumes about your identity...FAG!

Seems like your true colors are coming out. You talk all this nonsense about people being nice and about the quality of the discourse here, yet in order to assuage your mistaken sense of violation you lash out and denigrate others with an prejudicial slur.

> You are a sick example of a human being, more like
> an animal then a human.

Just a nit-pick, but humans ARE animals.

> By the way I'm right about a lot, and this is yet
> another example of your ignorance. Your effort to
> gain support through imposter postings under other
> names here is obvious and shows how pitiful you
> truly can be.

I'm not Mesphisto, however this little tirade of yours is certainly not making me sympathetic to your plight. I'm sure this is the case with others as well.

Frankly most of this is nonsense - this site is filled with inflammatory rhetoric and senseless troll baiting. The trouble that I think you are having is that you are not able to articulate the certain-ness that you feel into a solid argument. When the argument you *do* present is torn to shreds your irrationality starts spinning out of control.

This makes you an easy target for troll baiting and inflammatory rhetoric. I haven't seen much of your posting, but what I have seen has you descend into that verbal abyss just as deeply as the people trying to pull you there. The only difference is that they don't make any pretensions about where they are traveling, where as you do. This, needless to say, only exasperates your flight into the abyss.

> Despite your efforts you still and will always
> fall short, in the front and behind.

Is this another homosexual reference?


Seriously Spunky, what's the deal here? How many posters do you believe inhabit this murky underground?

Five?

Why must Mephisto share an ID with another poster? Couldn't it be possible that more then one person has soured to your verbal transgressions?

Bravo, Professor!

Personally, I always thought you a bit of a douchebag, but this latest rhetorical flourish of yours has put me in standing ovation mode. Figuratively speaking, of course.

I say again, BRAVO Sir!

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.

Professor Pangloss Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> spunky Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > There's no doubt about who you are and how sick
> > you can be. The disgusting pictures you sent
> me
> > under the name of Furfur of 2 guys doin' it
> speaks
> > volumes about your identity...FAG!
>
> Seems like your true colors are coming out. You
> talk all this nonsense about people being nice and
> about the quality of the discourse here, yet in
> order to assuage your mistaken sense of violation
> you lash out and denigrate others with an
> prejudicial slur.
>

You don't seem to know the difference between lashing out and reporting on abusive posters here. If it's something not well received or frowned upon by this site then you are targeted, and I am not the first to state this ignorant fact, so where's your logic for such repeated statements? I thought so, you are blind to the facts.

> > You are a sick example of a human being, more
> like
> > an animal then a human.
>
> Just a nit-pick, but humans ARE animals.



They shouldn't act like it, as most do here.


>
> > By the way I'm right about a lot, and this is
> yet
> > another example of your ignorance. Your effort
> to
> > gain support through imposter postings under
> other
> > names here is obvious and shows how pitiful you
> > truly can be.
>
> I'm not Mesphisto, however this little tirade of
> yours is certainly not making me sympathetic to
> your plight. I'm sure this is the case with
> others as well.



Stating the facts doesn't constitute a tirade...IDIOT

Unless you are afraid of the facts.


> Frankly most of this is nonsense - this site is
> filled with inflammatory rhetoric and senseless
> troll baiting. The trouble that I think you are
> having is that you are not able to articulate the
> certain-ness that you feel into a solid argument.
> When the argument you *do* present is torn to
> shreds your irrationality starts spinning out of
> control.
>
> This makes you an easy target for troll baiting
> and inflammatory rhetoric. I haven't seen much of
> your posting, but what I have seen has you descend
> into that verbal abyss just as deeply as the
> people trying to pull you there. The only
> difference is that they don't make any pretensions
> about where they are traveling, where as you do.
> This, needless to say, only exasperates your
> flight into the abyss.



I do not appreciate Furfur, or the egos behind him sending me pictures of gays doing it to the music 'round, round', while these pictures bounce around my screen. He ruined that song for me. I am convinced now this must be a gay site or police site for the amount of males here compared to females. You then are hostile as well, as it appears most all here are gay. But no one has the guts to admitt it, regardless this site is sick.
>
> > Despite your efforts you still and will always
> > fall short, in the front and behind.
>
> Is this another homosexual reference?
>
>
> Seriously Spunky, what's the deal here? How many
> posters do you believe inhabit this murky
> underground?
>
> Five?
>
> Why must Mephisto share an ID with another poster?
> Couldn't it be possible that more then one person
> has soured to your verbal transgressions?

spunky Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> I do not appreciate Furfur, or the egos behind him
> sending me pictures of gays doing it to the music
> 'round, round', while these pictures bounce around
> my screen. He ruined that song for me.

Haha, that is seriously hilarious... Especially if it was the Beach boys...


> I am
> convinced now this must be a gay site or police
> site for the amount of males here compared to
> females. You then are hostile as well, as it
> appears most all here are gay. But no one has the
> guts to admitt it, regardless this site is sick.

Why do you hate men so much?

spunky Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You don't seem to know the difference between
> lashing out and reporting on abusive posters here.

Oh come on! Are you seriously trying to tell me what you were doing was a noble effort of reporting abusive posters?

This is nonsense. Did you mistake the 'report' button for the 'reply' button?

They serve different purposes, you know. Further, that still doesn't give you the intellectual license to castigate fellow posters by smearing their sexuality (with a derogatory term no less!). Or are you trying to tell me that you and Cary have secret code words, where "FAG" really means 'abusive poster'?

> If it's something not well received or frowned
> upon by this site then you are targeted, and I am
> not the first to state this ignorant fact, so
> where's your logic for such repeated statements?
> I thought so, you are blind to the facts.

Targeted? What happens is that you are mocked. This is the internet, the realm of the anonymous adult. I think that we can all handle such transgressions of not being well received - but this is beside the point.

I was pointing out the hypocrisy of engaging in name calling and derision while trying to keep this place "pure and clean". I was also pointing out why you rhetorically get it more in the teeth then other users here.

You keep wanting to take this back to the Maryter-zone where poor Spunky is innocently talking about Teddy Ruxpin and snowflake the Carebear and all of a sudden MrMephisto or one of his 'persona's' comes into your thread and viciously rips the rhetorical guts out of the conversation, leaving you clutching your tattered teddy-bear crying out at the injustice in the world.

This is not the case. While you do not seem to possess the venom of your counterparts, you do frequently engage them in a similar manner. What separates you is that you then have the temerity to cry foul.

> They shouldn't act like it, as most do here.

Spunky, this is the bowels of the internet here. I've seen pictures of a woman defecating into her own mouth. There is no safe place on the internet. Anonymous is legion, and he never forgives. If you cry out, you only get beaten harder.

This is life on the intrawebs, Spunky. You can seek no absolution, for there isn't any.

> Stating the facts doesn't constitute a
> tirade...IDIOT
>
> Unless you are afraid of the facts.

Is this the first poster you've accused of multiple IDs? Is this the first time you've slung out insults while complaining about people insulting you?

Seriously, what was your remarkable fact here? The use of 'used'. This usage is utterly common, Spunky. It hardly constitutes the metaphoric photograph of the people on the grassy knoll.

But let's say it was a 'major break in the case'. You've figured out that MrMephisto is literally 1/2 the posters here.

So what? Do you think this new found discovery is going to keep the Jackles at bay?

> I do not appreciate Furfur, or the egos behind him
> sending me pictures of gays doing it to the music
> 'round, round', while these pictures bounce around
> my screen. He ruined that song for me. I am
> convinced now this must be a gay site or police
> site for the amount of males here compared to
> females. You then are hostile as well, as it
> appears most all here are gay. But no one has the
> guts to admitt it, regardless this site is sick.

He ruined the song for you?

Come on, Spunky, let's get real. He upset you. You have a valid complaint there, you received unwelcomed pictures. Fine.

Here is an idea, when you receive an email from someone you don't like, just delete the email, unopened. Then subsequently delete all email from that person.

As far as me being hostile - I'm not hostile towards you Spunky, I'm just tired of see you play the victim here while dwelling in hypocrisy. All it does is encourage more victimization.

You also seem to have a problem with homosexuality. Some posters have picked up on this. You can't control those posters, but what you can do is address your latent hostilities towards homosexuality. You need to realize that they are people and not sexual bogeymen.

Pangloss, I'm seriously. There is no way you can convince Spunky of anything resembling reason, logic, or facts. It feels good at first to lay into "her," but you will never, ever accomplish anything with it.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

fairfaxdude Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bravo, Professor!
>
> Personally, I always thought you a bit of a
> douchebag, but this latest rhetorical flourish of
> yours has put me in standing ovation mode.
> Figuratively speaking, of course.
>
> I say again, BRAVO Sir!


ur a fag 2

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Pangloss, I'm seriously. There is no way you can
> convince Spunky of anything resembling reason,
> logic, or facts. It feels good at first to lay
> into "her," but you will never, ever accomplish
> anything with it.

That is probably true, however sometimes I just need to get somethings off my chest. Her rank hypocrisy rankles me...

father Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fairfaxdude Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Bravo, Professor!
> >
> > Personally, I always thought you a bit of a
> > douchebag, but this latest rhetorical flourish
> of
> > yours has put me in standing ovation mode.
> > Figuratively speaking, of course.
> >
> > I say again, BRAVO Sir!
>
>
> ur a fag 2


Such an eloquent reply. It's a shame that we have been deprived of your wit for so long. Please, register yourself and contribute to the community, post haste!

I think he's too busy tearing his desk apart looking for custody papers to get the whole "registration" process underway. Plus, of course, he's too fucking stupid to figure it out.

Right, "father"?

I can just imagine the dinner table discourse:

"Listen up, faggot, I told you to do your homework, you fag"...

"But, Dad, I don't have any homework".....

"STFU you faggot, only faggots say they don't have homework, you faggot"

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.

spunky Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Professor Pangloss Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Please explain, spunky, what do you mean no
> past
> > tense is needed? Right now I'm too lazy to
> > actually look this up and it's very unimportant
> to
> > me, but I fail to see how this particular piece
> of
> > grammar, even if it is incorrect, constitutes
> as
> > definitive proof.
> >
> > I would say that the vernacular is to say
> 'used'
> > in these sorts of situations.
>
>
> Well, you would be wrong there Pang (Mess). As
> you have been before.
>
> Ones writing style is unique and this proof is
> more then a coincidence, It's consistent with the
> writing style of Mess, or a foreigner to our
> language.

pwnd again by the prof? you failed to answer his question, now can you stop talking bullshit and tell us all how men are to blame for everything, and how the devil is real, and infact actively posts on FFXU?

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Spunky says that many of her bullshit crackpot
> theories can be proven, but any time someone asks
> her to prove it, she gives one of two answers:
>
> 1. You're an imposter, so I don't need to prove
> it to you, FAG.
>
> 2. I don't need to prove it, I know it's fact,
> and if you don't believe me, you can pound salt.
> FAG.

^^^^ this

spunky Wrote:
I am
> convinced now this must be a gay site or police
> site for the amount of males here compared to
> females.

its not our fault women dont know how to work da internetz