So with the new VA governor...will there be another round of panic gun and ammo buying?

I don't live in VA anymore, but do drive through there regularly and sometimes buy ammo.

As well you should with the number of unhinged and unstable right-wimgers runing around loose.

I got stocked up pretty good between the last panic and the coming one. It wasnt easy tho, lots of places cleaned out again!

Won't happen.

McAuliffe will have a difficult enough time with routine day-to-day legislative matters. He's not in a strong enough position with the legislature and voters to even attempt something like that. It would be political suicide for him and the Dems.

Dont worry theres plenty of ammo for sale.. Just let me get there first ..

McAwfull is the new Gov of Va Not the POTUS. Federal law is what controls guns unless states flip out as did Ca, Co .. but Va will not McAwfull will not get a single thing thru the GOP State House they dont go along with.. Va Tech was on Tim Kanes watch .. he would have loved to get some gun grabs going.. did not stand a chance. Dont Worry about this toothless dog McAwfull. Hes only got a coupole teeth and they will be all gone after the 2014 elections with people pissed as hell with Liar Care.

Obama= Liar or Lie Lieing Obama Care= Liar Care Don't tell me another Obama you asshole...


Obama! She Obama him good Hes Obama his ass off now.. Obama = LIAR..

Comrade Terry will be lucky if he can get the legislature to go along with an Arbor Day celebration much less anything to do with guns.

Regardless of what Terry does, or does not do, I have 3 more to buy before this coming summer.

Oh, I don't think Terry will be doing too much to restrict guns in the Old Dominion. Ah, skeet shooting? Yeah right!

Just because Virginia Democratic gubernatorial candidate Terry McAuliffe is pushing for an assault weapons ban and one-gun-a-month restriction in the Old Dominion doesn't mean he's opposed to slinging lead.

In fact, the former Democratic Party chairman is one of Virginia's newest gun owners, the proud papa of a sleek Beretta over and under shotgun, the standard of excellence at the area's skeet ranges.

Secrets first heard of his purchase over the weekend from shoppers at Dick's Sporting Goods in Bailey's Crossroads who saw the likely Democratic gubernatorial nominee shouldering one of the pricy long guns.

His campaign confirmed the purchase and even gave us a reason. "It was a Beretta shotgun so he and his son, who is currently a second-year midshipman at the U.S. Naval Academy, can go skeet shooting together," said campaign spokesman Josh Schwerin.

Source: http://washingtonexaminer.com/gun-control-fan-terry-mcauliffe-is-virginias-newest-gun-owner/article/2517872

Stabitha Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I got stocked up pretty good between the last
> panic and the coming one. It wasnt easy tho, lots
> of places cleaned out again!

Panic. Or paranoid? Open pussy,insert foot.

No Panic Buying Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dont worry theres plenty of ammo for sale.. Just
> let me get there first ..
>
> McAwfull is the new Gov of Va Not the POTUS.
> Federal law is what controls guns unless states
> flip out as did Ca, Co .. but Va will not McAwfull
> will not get a single thing thru the GOP State
> House they dont go along with.. Va Tech was on Tim
> Kanes watch .. he would have loved to get some gun
> grabs going.. did not stand a chance. Dont Worry
> about this toothless dog McAwfull. Hes only got a
> coupole teeth and they will be all gone after the
> 2014 elections with people pissed as hell with
> Liar Care.
>
> Obama= Liar or Lie Lieing Obama Care= Liar Care
> Don't tell me another Obama you asshole...
>
>
> Obama! She Obama him good Hes Obama his ass off
> now.. Obama = LIAR..


Obviously there is no sort of intelligence test to be able to purchase firearms or ammunition.

He was elected by the skin of his teeth.
Mayor Bloomberg was a major contributor.
He owes Bloomberg big time.

Nations Gun Show. Nov 22-24

So, a panic to run out and buy guns and ammo at 300% over normal prices occurred last time Faux news and Infowars told you to do it... which ultimately proved to be bullshit considering no federal proposal that was up for vote even taking away any type of gun; only requiring mental checks and a clip limit (you could just reload ya know)

So that passes, nothing changes thanks to the NRA lobbyists

Now you morons are being drummed up again to pay 3 times the price... and you haven't learned your lesson>?

Hey fuck nuts, gun sellers and manufacturers are a big business, and they are playing you like the dumb shits you are.

Fool me once... uh... shame... shame on you
Fool me twi... twice.... you aint gonna fool me!

By pass I mean goes away, not legislatively passed, as afterall even mental checks were something that LaPierre opposed.

I wonder why

One gun is for protection.
Two guns is getting paranoid
Three or more guns is collecting. Real men don't collect.
Boys collect. The more guns you collect,the more ammo a schmuck thinks he has to have. If the shit remotely ever started, you boys would wished you had invested in pampers instead of ammo. I could have written "adult" pampers but would have been pushin' it.
When the fan is hit by the shit..

Its better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6.

Ammo for schmucks Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> One gun is for protection.
> Two guns is getting paranoid
> Three or more guns is collecting. Real men don't
> collect.
> Boys collect. The more guns you collect,the more
> ammo a schmuck thinks he has to have. If the shit
> remotely ever started, you boys would wished you
> had invested in pampers instead of ammo. I could
> have written "adult" pampers but would have been
> pushin' it.
> When the fan is hit by the shit..

Shotgun for hunting rabbits and squirrels.
Rifle for hunting deer.
.223 rifle for hunting coyotes.
Pistol for home defense. (shotgun can be used, depending)

The dumbasses I see on this forum never cease to amaze me.
You need to get out of the house more often.

G&A Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ammo for schmucks Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > One gun is for protection.
> > Two guns is getting paranoid
> > Three or more guns is collecting. Real men
> don't
> > collect.
> > Boys collect. The more guns you collect,the
> more
> > ammo a schmuck thinks he has to have. If the
> shit
> > remotely ever started, you boys would wished
> you
> > had invested in pampers instead of ammo. I
> could
> > have written "adult" pampers but would have
> been
> > pushin' it.
> > When the fan is hit by the shit..
>
> Shotgun for hunting rabbits and squirrels.
> Rifle for hunting deer.
> .223 rifle for hunting coyotes.
>s Pistol for home defense. (shotgun can be used,
> depending)
>
> The dumbasses I see on this forum never cease to
> amaze me.
> You need to get out of the house more often.


It appears you enjoy shooting small animals.
Have you ever hunted?
Jeffrey Dahmer had the same MO.

I think the best home defense weapon is a 12 gauge pump shotgun. It's conceivable you would never have to fire a shot if someone broke in and attacked you or your family. Once the scum hears you rack a shell with the slide, chances are he is heading right back out pronto!

Remington Model 870 Heme Defender. 18" barrel and holds 7 shells (with one in the pipe)

None of which are being banned or questioned by the feds or any state government including Colorado.

Morons

Fuck, Biden's telling people to use a shotgun to protect their home. No one is against responsible gun ownership, except for the nutjobs who are just as bad as the Breitbarts of the world on the far left.

Everyone who matters simply wants more accountability of gun dealers who trade under the table, mentally ill people who have shown violent past tendencies or have been arrested for domestic abuse, and a small control on the number of bullets in any single load. You can have as many bullets as your heart contents but you don't have to have a 10 bullet magazine to be able to enjoy guns responsibly.

Why is that so fuckin vile? Seriously?

Now go on and make your gun run and help the corporations make more off of your stupidity.

GOP Logic28 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> None of which are being banned or questioned by
> the feds or any state government including
> Colorado.
>
> Morons
>
> Fuck, Biden's telling people to use a shotgun to
> protect their home. No one is against responsible
> gun ownership, except for the nutjobs who are just
> as bad as the Breitbarts of the world on the far
> left.
>
> Everyone who matters simply wants more
> accountability of gun dealers who trade under the
> table, mentally ill people who have shown violent
> past tendencies or have been arrested for domestic
> abuse, and a small control on the number of
> bullets in any single load. You can have as many
> bullets as your heart contents but you don't have
> to have a 10 bullet magazine to be able to enjoy
> guns responsibly.
>
> Why is that so fuckin vile? Seriously?
>
> Now go on and make your gun run and help the
> corporations make more off of your stupidity.


While I appreciate that's the position of more realistic and sensible people, actually that's not what a lot want. They want guns to be banned. Period. That's made clear by their own statements. They just know that they can't get away with that, so they try to do it a little at a time. As also is stated as strategy. Which is why they get the stone-wall push back by the same absolutists on the other side.

Gun advocacy groups generally don't oppose going after illegal gun sellers or mental health checks. In fact, they've directly supported both. Magazine limits don't fall into that same category. Rather, it's just simply pointless nuisance legislation to satisfy an urge by people who don't really understand the subject beyond "Guns are bad! We must do SOMETHING!" whether it actually effectively addresses any problem or not.

Both groups are their own worst enemies at times.

GOP Logic28 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Everyone who matters simply wants more
> accountability of gun dealers who trade under the
> table, mentally ill people who have shown violent
> past tendencies or have been arrested for domestic
> abuse, and a small control on the number of
> bullets in any single load. You can have as many
> bullets as your heart contents but you don't have
> to have a 10 bullet magazine to be able to enjoy
> guns responsibly.

Bull pucky. Gun dealers run checks on purchasers. What the Bloomburgs of the world want is to outlaw guns. It's pretty simple and clear.

I am going to shut down the gun shows and take away your guns! You idiots do not need a 30 round clip to hunt a deer! Screw your "rights," it is consensus that counts these days you stupid red necks. There is NO legitimate reason 90% of you need guns of any sort. Look for my legislation soon, you mouth breathing gun owners!

Terry McAuliffe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am going to shut down the gun shows and take
> away your guns! You idiots do not need a 30 round
> clip to hunt a deer! Screw your "rights," it is
> consensus that counts these days you stupid red
> necks. There is NO legitimate reason 90% of you
> need guns of any sort. Look for my legislation
> soon, you mouth breathing gun owners!


*yawn* *stretch* Yeah, good luck with that.

lol

Yet another same old gun thread Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> GOP Logic28 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > None of which are being banned or questioned by
> > the feds or any state government including
> > Colorado.
> >
> > Morons
> >
> > Fuck, Biden's telling people to use a shotgun
> to
> > protect their home. No one is against
> responsible
> > gun ownership, except for the nutjobs who are
> just
> > as bad as the Breitbarts of the world on the
> far
> > left.
> >
> > Everyone who matters simply wants more
> > accountability of gun dealers who trade under
> the
> > table, mentally ill people who have shown
> violent
> > past tendencies or have been arrested for
> domestic
> > abuse, and a small control on the number of
> > bullets in any single load. You can have as
> many
> > bullets as your heart contents but you don't
> have
> > to have a 10 bullet magazine to be able to
> enjoy
> > guns responsibly.
> >
> > Why is that so fuckin vile? Seriously?
> >
> > Now go on and make your gun run and help the
> > corporations make more off of your stupidity.
>
>
> While I appreciate that's the position of more
> realistic and sensible people, actually that's not
> what a lot want. They want guns to be banned.
> Period. That's made clear by their own
> statements. They just know that they can't get
> away with that, so they try to do it a little at a
> time. As also is stated as strategy. Which is
> why they get the stone-wall push back by the same
> absolutists on the other side.
>
> Gun advocacy groups generally don't oppose going
> after illegal gun sellers or mental health checks.
> In fact, they've directly supported both.
> Magazine limits don't fall into that same
> category. Rather, it's just simply pointless
> nuisance legislation to satisfy an urge by people
> who don't really understand the subject beyond
> "Guns are bad! We must do SOMETHING!" whether it
> actually effectively addresses any problem or
> not.
>
> Both groups are their own worst enemies at times.


And like I said, Breitbart and far right people say a lot of disruptive statements as well. The 80% of people, the ones who matter, are in the middle. The problem is the lobbyists on the Breitbart side won out last time with gun panic sentiment as has been echoed on this thread several times now.

Most people just want logical reforms. Whether a specific city wants to ban it, well thats local rights, if the people support it, they support it and people can vote with their feet.

Last I checked GOP is supposed to be in favor of local and state rights over federal overarching. So why does that only apply to things that the GOP favors? NYC is within their rights to propose policy that they believe to be best for their citizens so long as it stands constitutionally. To date, the supreme court has allowed for restraints on the 2nd amendment for military level weaponry; so it is constitutional what he is proposing.

As your new Governor, I cannot wait to take away your guns! BAHAHAHA!!!

A real killer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> G&A Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Ammo for schmucks Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > One gun is for protection.
> > > Two guns is getting paranoid
> > > Three or more guns is collecting. Real men
> > don't
> > > collect.
> > > Boys collect. The more guns you collect,the
> > more
> > > ammo a schmuck thinks he has to have. If the
> > shit
> > > remotely ever started, you boys would wished
> > you
> > > had invested in pampers instead of ammo. I
> > could
> > > have written "adult" pampers but would have
> > been
> > > pushin' it.
> > > When the fan is hit by the shit..
> >
> > Shotgun for hunting rabbits and squirrels.
> > Rifle for hunting deer.
> > .223 rifle for hunting coyotes.
> >s Pistol for home defense. (shotgun can be used,
> > depending)
> >
> > The dumbasses I see on this forum never cease
> to
> > amaze me.
> > You need to get out of the house more often.
>
>
> It appears you enjoy shooting small animals.
> Have you ever hunted?
> Jeffrey Dahmer had the same MO.

Ah yes, you're another one of those urban hicks who has never known a hunter.
Try reading the Virginia game laws and you'll find a lot of different critters are popularly hunted.

States Right remember? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yet another same old gun thread Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > GOP Logic28 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > None of which are being banned or questioned
> by
> > > the feds or any state government including
> > > Colorado.
> > >
> > > Morons
> > >
> > > Fuck, Biden's telling people to use a shotgun
> > to
> > > protect their home. No one is against
> > responsible
> > > gun ownership, except for the nutjobs who are
> > just
> > > as bad as the Breitbarts of the world on the
> > far
> > > left.
> > >
> > > Everyone who matters simply wants more
> > > accountability of gun dealers who trade under
> > the
> > > table, mentally ill people who have shown
> > violent
> > > past tendencies or have been arrested for
> > domestic
> > > abuse, and a small control on the number of
> > > bullets in any single load. You can have as
> > many
> > > bullets as your heart contents but you don't
> > have
> > > to have a 10 bullet magazine to be able to
> > enjoy
> > > guns responsibly.
> > >
> > > Why is that so fuckin vile? Seriously?
> > >
> > > Now go on and make your gun run and help the
> > > corporations make more off of your stupidity.
> >
> >
> > While I appreciate that's the position of more
> > realistic and sensible people, actually that's
> not
> > what a lot want. They want guns to be banned.
> > Period. That's made clear by their own
> > statements. They just know that they can't get
> > away with that, so they try to do it a little at
> a
> > time. As also is stated as strategy. Which is
> > why they get the stone-wall push back by the
> same
> > absolutists on the other side.
> >
> > Gun advocacy groups generally don't oppose
> going
> > after illegal gun sellers or mental health
> checks.
> > In fact, they've directly supported both.
> > Magazine limits don't fall into that same
> > category. Rather, it's just simply pointless
> > nuisance legislation to satisfy an urge by
> people
> > who don't really understand the subject beyond
> > "Guns are bad! We must do SOMETHING!" whether
> it
> > actually effectively addresses any problem or
> > not.
> >
> > Both groups are their own worst enemies at
> times.
>
>
> And like I said, Breitbart and far right people
> say a lot of disruptive statements as well. The
> 80% of people, the ones who matter, are in the
> middle. The problem is the lobbyists on the
> Breitbart side won out last time with gun panic
> sentiment as has been echoed on this thread
> several times now.
>
> Most people just want logical reforms. Whether a
> specific city wants to ban it, well thats local
> rights, if the people support it, they support it
> and people can vote with their feet.
>
> Last I checked GOP is supposed to be in favor of
> local and state rights over federal overarching.
> So why does that only apply to things that the GOP
> favors? NYC is within their rights to propose
> policy that they believe to be best for their
> citizens so long as it stands constitutionally. To
> date, the supreme court has allowed for restraints
> on the 2nd amendment for military level weaponry;
> so it is constitutional what he is proposing.

I tended to support some of the enhanced back ground checks, but as soon as the hysterical liberal idiots were demanding stopped talking about that, and talked about reinstating a ban that did not work in the first place, and other dumb proposals, I stopped supporting them because they devolved and squandered their opportunity do do something smart to just pushing their authoritarian narrative to ban guns.

I pretty much started opposing all of their crap after I saw that old walking sack of shit Feinstein give that speech and gun control proposal. I was GLAD to see their end result legislation (again, which had nothing to do with seriously dealing with mental health issues) go down in flames.

I am not really an NRA supporter either, though I did dig their museum.

First order of business...reenact the 1 firearm for 30 day policy, this time I will make it 1 firearm every 3 years!

Terry McAuliffe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> First order of business...reenact the 1 firearm
> for 30 day policy, this time I will make it 1
> firearm every 3 years!

Shove it up your ass Terry.

HouseOfDelegates...YOUR house is FIRST on the list for a tactical geared FCPD visit!!!

Terry McAuliffe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> HouseOfDelegates...YOUR house is FIRST on the list
> for a tactical geared FCPD visit!!!

Whiney little bitch aren't you? Didn't you're mommy give you your meds today?

HouseOfDelegates Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Terry McAuliffe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > HouseOfDelegates...YOUR house is FIRST on the
> list
> > for a tactical geared FCPD visit!!!
>
> Whiney little bitch aren't you? Didn't you're
> mommy give you your meds today?

Calling me names won't take you off of the list!

You have no list. Only an overactive imagination.

Terry McAuliffe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> HouseOfDelegates Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Terry McAuliffe Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > HouseOfDelegates...YOUR house is FIRST on the
> > list
> > > for a tactical geared FCPD visit!!!
> >
> > Whiney little bitch aren't you? Didn't you're
> > mommy give you your meds today?
>
> Calling me names won't take you off of the list!


If you're going to troll, then at least put some fucking effort into it.

Joey Stalin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Comrade Terry will be lucky if he can get the
> legislature to go along with an Arbor Day
> celebration much less anything to do with guns.



Terry is a Clinton stooge. He will spend his entire term setting up Virginia for Hillary in 2016. In return, she will appoint him to a job where he can shake down diplomats and fleece local governors.

LetsRock...you are #2 on the list, merely because of your made up nonsense and insolence!

G&A Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A real killer Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > G&A Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Ammo for schmucks Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > One gun is for protection.
> > > > Two guns is getting paranoid
> > > > Three or more guns is collecting. Real men
> > > don't
> > > > collect.
> > > > Boys collect. The more guns you collect,the
> > > more
> > > > ammo a schmuck thinks he has to have. If
> the
> > > shit
> > > > remotely ever started, you boys would
> wished
> > > you
> > > > had invested in pampers instead of ammo. I
> > > could
> > > > have written "adult" pampers but would have
> > > been
> > > > pushin' it.
> > > > When the fan is hit by the shit..
> > >
> > > Shotgun for hunting rabbits and squirrels.
> > > Rifle for hunting deer.
> > > .223 rifle for hunting coyotes.
> > >s Pistol for home defense. (shotgun can be
> used,
> > > depending)
> > >
> > > The dumbasses I see on this forum never cease
> > to
> > > amaze me.
> > > You need to get out of the house more often.
> >
> >
> > It appears you enjoy shooting small animals.
> > Have you ever hunted?
> > Jeffrey Dahmer had the same MO.
>
> Ah yes, you're another one of those urban hicks
> who has never known a hunter.
> Try reading the Virginia game laws and you'll find
> a lot of different critters are popularly hunted.

Little critters? Big game for you? Impressive.
Using a .223,I thought you might have had a little experience with a differant type of game. You know the type,where the critters shoot back. Maybe we are on seperate levels of hunting. I shot a squirrel when I was a kid. Felt real bad about it. When I became a man I gave up my childish thoughts.
And I like coyotes. They are an essential part of the natural food chain.
Peace.

Ammo for Schmucks, pt. deux Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> G&A Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > A real killer Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > G&A Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Ammo for schmucks Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > One gun is for protection.
> > > > > Two guns is getting paranoid
> > > > > Three or more guns is collecting. Real
> men
> > > > don't
> > > > > collect.
> > > > > Boys collect. The more guns you
> collect,the
> > > > more
> > > > > ammo a schmuck thinks he has to have. If
> > the
> > > > shit
> > > > > remotely ever started, you boys would
> > wished
> > > > you
> > > > > had invested in pampers instead of ammo.
> I
> > > > could
> > > > > have written "adult" pampers but would
> have
> > > > been
> > > > > pushin' it.
> > > > > When the fan is hit by the shit..
> > > >
> > > > Shotgun for hunting rabbits and squirrels.
> > > > Rifle for hunting deer.
> > > > .223 rifle for hunting coyotes.
> > > >s Pistol for home defense. (shotgun can be
> > used,
> > > > depending)
> > > >
> > > > The dumbasses I see on this forum never
> cease
> > > to
> > > > amaze me.
> > > > You need to get out of the house more
> often.
> > >
> > >
> > > It appears you enjoy shooting small animals.
> > > Have you ever hunted?
> > > Jeffrey Dahmer had the same MO.
> >
> > Ah yes, you're another one of those urban hicks
> > who has never known a hunter.
> > Try reading the Virginia game laws and you'll
> find
> > a lot of different critters are popularly
> hunted.
>
> Little critters? Big game for you? Impressive.
> Using a .223,I thought you might have had a little
> experience with a differant type of game. You know
> the type,where the critters shoot back. Maybe we
> are on seperate levels of hunting. I shot a
> squirrel when I was a kid. Felt real bad about it.
> When I became a man I gave up my childish
> thoughts.
> And I like coyotes. They are an essential part of
> the natural food chain.
> Peace.

Yes, I'm experienced with the .223 in Vietnam only the military round is
called a 5.56X45 mm (NATO) round. Four years active duty Army with a tour
in Nam. I like the round for hunting medium sized game and there's no
recoil. You might want to talk to some chicken farmers about coyotes being
an "essential part of the natural food chain". Sorry for your bad experience
as a child. Too bad your parents didn't help you get over it.
Check this out:

http://www.dgif.virginia.gov/hunting/

States Right remember? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> And like I said, Breitbart and far right people
> say a lot of disruptive statements as well. The
> 80% of people, the ones who matter, are in the
> middle. The problem is the lobbyists on the
> Breitbart side won out last time with gun panic
> sentiment as has been echoed on this thread
> several times now.

Actually no common sense won out since everything being banned was aesthetic. When no one else had a gun magazine size doesnt matter. The VT shooter only had two pistols and they were some of the smallest caliber ones you can have and did massive amounts of damage because he was the only one with a gun.

Its just like the assault rifle bs. They arent the same the military uses, they dont have burst fire ability which is what makes them extremely deadly. Theyre just a rifle that looks scary.

Same reason why semi-automatic is always stated during a shooting to get the word automatic in there and scare people. Basically every gun since the civil war has been semi auto or better, it just means one shot per trigger pull.


> Most people just want logical reforms. Whether a
> specific city wants to ban it, well thats local
> rights, if the people support it, they support it
> and people can vote with their feet.

Cities do get leeway with it if their population wants it. However the constitution overrides it when it turns to full on outright bans which is the ultimate goal. Never once has a gun law been passed and the anti-gun groups said finally were done, they just move onto pushing it further.

Theres already 10s of thousands of gun laws and laws against crime, one more law isnt going to do anything positive.

> Last I checked GOP is supposed to be in favor of
> local and state rights over federal overarching.
> So why does that only apply to things that the GOP
> favors? NYC is within their rights to propose
> policy that they believe to be best for their
> citizens so long as it stands constitutionally. To
> date, the supreme court has allowed for restraints
> on the 2nd amendment for military level weaponry;
> so it is constitutional what he is proposing.

Just because it may be legal doesnt mean its not stupid and does nothing. Their 7 round magazine for handguns was so well thought out they didnt even exclude police or realize magazines arent made in that size. So their solution was okay you can have magazines but can only put 7 rounds in it, that makes sense.

If an overwhelming majority of the population wants it they usually get it, the problem is its rarely if ever that case. Theres enough liberal gun owners that the majority almost always falls on the other side but because they vote party line the people in power represent a position that the majority does not actually support. Not to mention crime goes up and the city becomes the typical crime infested American city.

If they really want it though thats fine give it to them at a local level. Local policies are easily undone as we saw in Colorado. But theyre being hypocrites if they complain when a company wont sell them weapons that citizens cant own.

I think Terry has been bangin Hillary since Bill wont get near her (with good reason). If the GOP doesnt come up with a viable candidate for 2016, that old hag has it in the bag and she will give Terry a cushy cabinet post.

The gun nuts in the closet losers are comparing notes again. Not too much longer and your privilege of owning a gun will be gone to protect yourselves. Pathetic losers all of you are. Gun owners are the #1 criminal in this country. I'll make sure to bump this post in a few months when you republican dirt bags have to turn in your firearms or are banned from owning a vast majority of them. It's only for the best.

old lady Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The gun nuts in the closet losers are comparing
> notes again. Not too much longer and your
> privilege of owning a gun will be gone to protect
> yourselves. Pathetic losers all of you are. Gun
> owners are the #1 criminal in this country. I'll
> make sure to bump this post in a few months when
> you republican dirt bags have to turn in your
> firearms or are banned from owning a vast majority
> of them. It's only for the best.

Gonna repeal the 2nd Amendment are you?

Why dont you take a long walk down MLK Ave in Anacostia at about 3am you old hag.

G&A Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ammo for Schmucks, pt. deux Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > G&A Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > A real killer Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > G&A Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Ammo for schmucks Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > One gun is for protection.
> > > > > > Two guns is getting paranoid
> > > > > > Three or more guns is collecting. Real
> > men
> > > > > don't
> > > > > > collect.
> > > > > > Boys collect. The more guns you
> > collect,the
> > > > > more
> > > > > > ammo a schmuck thinks he has to have.
> If
> > > the
> > > > > shit
> > > > > > remotely ever started, you boys would
> > > wished
> > > > > you
> > > > > > had invested in pampers instead of
> ammo.
> > I
> > > > > could
> > > > > > have written "adult" pampers but would
> > have
> > > > > been
> > > > > > pushin' it.
> > > > > > When the fan is hit by the shit..
> > > > >
> > > > > Shotgun for hunting rabbits and squirrels.
>
> > > > > Rifle for hunting deer.
> > > > > .223 rifle for hunting coyotes.
> > > > >s Pistol for home defense. (shotgun can be
> > > used,
> > > > > depending)
> > > > >
> > > > > The dumbasses I see on this forum never
> > cease
> > > > to
> > > > > amaze me.
> > > > > You need to get out of the house more
> > often.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It appears you enjoy shooting small
> animals.
> > > > Have you ever hunted?
> > > > Jeffrey Dahmer had the same MO.
> > >
> > > Ah yes, you're another one of those urban
> hicks
> > > who has never known a hunter.
> > > Try reading the Virginia game laws and you'll
> > find
> > > a lot of different critters are popularly
> > hunted.
> >
> > Little critters? Big game for you? Impressive.
> > Using a .223,I thought you might have had a
> little
> > experience with a differant type of game. You
> know
> > the type,where the critters shoot back. Maybe
> we
> > are on seperate levels of hunting. I shot a
> > squirrel when I was a kid. Felt real bad about
> it.
> > When I became a man I gave up my childish
> > thoughts.
> > And I like coyotes. They are an essential part
> of
> > the natural food chain.
> > Peace.
>
> Yes, I'm experienced with the .223 in Vietnam only
> the military round is
> called a 5.56X45 mm (NATO) round. Four years
> active duty Army with a tour
> in Nam. I like the round for hunting medium sized
> game and there's no
> recoil. You might want to talk to some chicken
> farmers about coyotes being
> an "essential part of the natural food chain".
> Sorry for your bad experience
> as a child. Too bad your parents didn't help you
> get over it.
> Check this out:
>
> http://www.dgif.virginia.gov/hunting/

Appreciated. You greenies were lucky to be issued the too twentythree. I carried the mf-14 and it was a heavy piece of wood. But it did the job. One shot,one tree. One clip and I was a lumberjack. Came back to the land of golden arches and learned to make love instead of killing trees and people. Only own one pistol, my trusty old friend,Colt. The trinkets of survival
Never heard any lifer say 5.56x whatever. I guess I missed that part.
Probably stoned.
Peace

ps. Thanks for the hunting info but I'll just keep feeding the critters.

Lunatic gun owners are trying to justify gun violence due to their own doing. I'll have the last laugh. 2nd amendment does not apply anymore, it is widely ignored for good reasons because wack job gun owners. The founding fathers would not have added it if they could foresee you redneck psychopaths republican looney-toons. If anything the constitution needs to go to the shredder for your own protection and society as a whole. Now go squeeze one off.

old lady Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lunatic gun owners are trying to justify gun
> violence due to their own doing. I'll have the
> last laugh. 2nd amendment does not apply anymore,
> it is widely ignored for good reasons because wack
> job gun owners. The founding fathers would not
> have added it if they could foresee you redneck
> psychopaths republican looney-toons. If anything
> the constitution needs to go to the shredder for
> your own protection and society as a whole. Now go
> squeeze one off.


Rough day Gerry?

Liberal Logic 29 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> States Right remember? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > And like I said, Breitbart and far right people
> > say a lot of disruptive statements as well. The
> > 80% of people, the ones who matter, are in the
> > middle. The problem is the lobbyists on the
> > Breitbart side won out last time with gun panic
> > sentiment as has been echoed on this thread
> > several times now.
>
> Actually no common sense won out since everything
> being banned was aesthetic. When no one else had
> a gun magazine size doesnt matter. The VT shooter
> only had two pistols and they were some of the
> smallest caliber ones you can have and did massive
> amounts of damage because he was the only one with
> a gun.
>
> Its just like the assault rifle bs. They arent
> the same the military uses, they dont have burst
> fire ability which is what makes them extremely
> deadly. Theyre just a rifle that looks scary.
>
> Same reason why semi-automatic is always stated
> during a shooting to get the word automatic in
> there and scare people. Basically every gun since
> the civil war has been semi auto or better, it
> just means one shot per trigger pull.
>
>
> > Most people just want logical reforms. Whether
> a
> > specific city wants to ban it, well thats local
> > rights, if the people support it, they support
> it
> > and people can vote with their feet.
>
> Cities do get leeway with it if their population
> wants it. However the constitution overrides it
> when it turns to full on outright bans which is
> the ultimate goal. Never once has a gun law been
> passed and the anti-gun groups said finally were
> done, they just move onto pushing it further.
>
> Theres already 10s of thousands of gun laws and
> laws against crime, one more law isnt going to do
> anything positive.
>
> > Last I checked GOP is supposed to be in favor
> of
> > local and state rights over federal
> overarching.
> > So why does that only apply to things that the
> GOP
> > favors? NYC is within their rights to propose
> > policy that they believe to be best for their
> > citizens so long as it stands constitutionally.
> To
> > date, the supreme court has allowed for
> restraints
> > on the 2nd amendment for military level
> weaponry;
> > so it is constitutional what he is proposing.
>
> Just because it may be legal doesnt mean its not
> stupid and does nothing. Their 7 round magazine
> for handguns was so well thought out they didnt
> even exclude police or realize magazines arent
> made in that size. So their solution was okay you
> can have magazines but can only put 7 rounds in
> it, that makes sense.
>
> If an overwhelming majority of the population
> wants it they usually get it, the problem is its
> rarely if ever that case. Theres enough liberal
> gun owners that the majority almost always falls
> on the other side but because they vote party line
> the people in power represent a position that the
> majority does not actually support. Not to
> mention crime goes up and the city becomes the
> typical crime infested American city.
>
> If they really want it though thats fine give it
> to them at a local level. Local policies are
> easily undone as we saw in Colorado. But theyre
> being hypocrites if they complain when a company
> wont sell them weapons that citizens cant own.


Which part? Seems you are always saying, err posting something.
You need to find a girlfriend or whatever. Never mind,you would bore them to death too. One accomplishment you might add to the résumé.

Thanks for your tour,brother Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> G&A Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Ammo for Schmucks, pt. deux Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > G&A Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > A real killer Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > G&A Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > Ammo for schmucks Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > One gun is for protection.
> > > > > > > Two guns is getting paranoid
> > > > > > > Three or more guns is collecting.
> Real
> > > men
> > > > > > don't
> > > > > > > collect.
> > > > > > > Boys collect. The more guns you
> > > collect,the
> > > > > > more
> > > > > > > ammo a schmuck thinks he has to have.
> > If
> > > > the
> > > > > > shit
> > > > > > > remotely ever started, you boys would
> > > > wished
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > > had invested in pampers instead of
> > ammo.
> > > I
> > > > > > could
> > > > > > > have written "adult" pampers but
> would
> > > have
> > > > > > been
> > > > > > > pushin' it.
> > > > > > > When the fan is hit by the shit..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Shotgun for hunting rabbits and
> squirrels.
> >
> > > > > > Rifle for hunting deer.
> > > > > > .223 rifle for hunting coyotes.
> > > > > >s Pistol for home defense. (shotgun can
> be
> > > > used,
> > > > > > depending)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The dumbasses I see on this forum never
> > > cease
> > > > > to
> > > > > > amaze me.
> > > > > > You need to get out of the house more
> > > often.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > It appears you enjoy shooting small
> > animals.
> > > > > Have you ever hunted?
> > > > > Jeffrey Dahmer had the same MO.
> > > >
> > > > Ah yes, you're another one of those urban
> > hicks
> > > > who has never known a hunter.
> > > > Try reading the Virginia game laws and
> you'll
> > > find
> > > > a lot of different critters are popularly
> > > hunted.
> > >
> > > Little critters? Big game for you?
> Impressive.
> > > Using a .223,I thought you might have had a
> > little
> > > experience with a differant type of game. You
> > know
> > > the type,where the critters shoot back. Maybe
> > we
> > > are on seperate levels of hunting. I shot a
> > > squirrel when I was a kid. Felt real bad
> about
> > it.
> > > When I became a man I gave up my childish
> > > thoughts.
> > > And I like coyotes. They are an essential
> part
> > of
> > > the natural food chain.
> > > Peace.
> >
> > Yes, I'm experienced with the .223 in Vietnam
> only
> > the military round is
> > called a 5.56X45 mm (NATO) round. Four years
> > active duty Army with a tour
> > in Nam. I like the round for hunting medium
> sized
> > game and there's no
> > recoil. You might want to talk to some chicken
> > farmers about coyotes being
> > an "essential part of the natural food chain".
> > Sorry for your bad experience
> > as a child. Too bad your parents didn't help
> you
> > get over it.
> > Check this out:
> >
> > http://www.dgif.virginia.gov/hunting/
>
> Appreciated. You greenies were lucky to be issued
> the too twentythree. I carried the mf-14 and it
> was a heavy piece of wood. But it did the job. One
> shot,one tree. One clip and I was a lumberjack.
> Came back to the land of golden arches and learned
> to make love instead of killing trees and people.
> Only own one pistol, my trusty old friend,Colt.
> The trinkets of survival
> Never heard any lifer say 5.56x whatever. I guess
> I missed that part.
> Probably stoned.
> Peace
>
> ps. Thanks for the hunting info but I'll just keep
> feeding the critters.

I was in Nam when my unit made the transision from M-14 to M-16. Never did like the M-16 because it felt like a toy and the 7.62mm round has a Hell of a lot more wallop. Another thing that drove me up a wall with the M-16 was it's total unsuitability for bayonet fighting. Gimme some weight please! I usually differentiate on the .223 and 5.56X because one of my rifles is a Ruger Mini-14 and on some models they're not always interchangeable.

>Re: Gun buying panic round 2?

>Posted by: old lady ()

>Date: November 12, 2013 05:47PM

>"I'll have the last laugh. 2nd amendment does not apply anymore, it is widely ignored for good reasons because wack job gun owners"

Yes Sure you will have "The Last Laugh" ..If another earthquake occurs thats much worse then the one we had as the looters tie you up and take what they want from your house , burn it and leave you for the Turkey Vultures.

Watch It !! Watch It!!! Did you just feel that... Oh My another tremor out of Louisa..!! You best get you a nice gun lady..and stop your fool posting..

G&A

I was in Nam when my unit made the transision from
> M-14 to M-16. Never did like the M-16 because it
> felt like a toy and the 7.62mm round has a Hell of
> a lot more wallop. Another thing that drove me up
> a wall with the M-16 was it's total unsuitability
> for bayonet fighting. Gimme some weight please! I
> usually differentiate on the .223 and 5.56X
> because one of my rifles is a Ruger Mini-14 and on
> some models they're not always interchangeable.


First of all, thank you for your military service, sir. Each day I tend to regret my military sacrifice since the Dems take America's freedom for granted.

Second, if you have a 150 round revolving clip on the AR-15, then one really doesn't need a bayonet. The video of this item in action on You Tube would make a Dems neck hair curl up even more.

Ahooo-Ah !

M-60 Gunner & M-203 Specialist Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> G&A
>
> I was in Nam when my unit made the transision
> from
> > M-14 to M-16. Never did like the M-16 because
> it
> > felt like a toy and the 7.62mm round has a Hell
> of
> > a lot more wallop. Another thing that drove me
> up
> > a wall with the M-16 was it's total
> unsuitability
> > for bayonet fighting. Gimme some weight please!
> I
> > usually differentiate on the .223 and 5.56X
> > because one of my rifles is a Ruger Mini-14 and
> on
> > some models they're not always interchangeable.
>
>
> First of all, thank you for your military service,
> sir. Each day I tend to regret my military
> sacrifice since the Dems take America's freedom
> for granted.
>
> Second, if you have a 150 round revolving clip on
> the AR-15, then one really doesn't need a bayonet.
> The video of this item in action on You Tube
> would make a Dems neck hair curl up even more.
>
> Ahooo-Ah !

Since the thread was created to draw attention of an upcoming panic and pandemonium due to a perceived ammunition shortage,would you please inform G&A and the forum how he can stock and even load a 150 round revolving "clip"?
Any information provided could be beneficial.
Even tho G&A and I had a spirited discussion on the amount of weapons and their usage,I feel he is an excellant marksman and has a vast knowledge of tools of the trade. Therefore 150 rounds might be a bit of overkill for the gentleman.
With apologies,but I'm getting a small whiff of bullshit. Maybe more than a whiff.

sign no true blooded progressive home wants to be without:

DEAR MISTER CRIMINAL:

WE ARE PROUD PROGRESSIVES

OURS IS A GUN-FREE HOME

PLEASE VISIT US WHENEVER AND AS OFTEN AS YOU FEEL LIKE IT.

Our wife will present her ass to you.
OUr husband will blow you.
Our kids will help carry your loot to your get away vehicle.
And our labrador retriever will wag its tail.

The wife looks forward to your return visits because darling husband can't keep it up.

dianefinewhinezourhero Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> sign no true blooded progressive home wants to be
> without:
>
> DEAR MISTER CRIMINAL:
>
> WE ARE PROUD PROGRESSIVES
>
> OURS IS A GUN-FREE HOME
>
> PLEASE VISIT US WHENEVER AND AS OFTEN AS YOU FEEL
> LIKE IT.
>
> Our wife will present her ass to you.
> OUr husband will blow you.
> Our kids will help carry your loot to your get
> away vehicle.
> And our labrador retriever will wag its tail.
>
> The wife looks forward to your return visits
> because darling husband can't keep it up.

A fine post. Did you stay up late to write this work of satire? America needs more creative thinkers such as yourself.
Please don't handle any sharp objects are loaded weapons in your state of mind.
God Bless....anyone who has or will have to associate with you.

Ammo for Schmucks,pt. cinq Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> M-60 Gunner & M-203 Specialist Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > G&A
> >
> > I was in Nam when my unit made the transision
> > from
> > > M-14 to M-16. Never did like the M-16 because
> > it
> > > felt like a toy and the 7.62mm round has a
> Hell
> > of
> > > a lot more wallop. Another thing that drove
> me
> > up
> > > a wall with the M-16 was it's total
> > unsuitability
> > > for bayonet fighting. Gimme some weight
> please!
> > I
> > > usually differentiate on the .223 and 5.56X
> > > because one of my rifles is a Ruger Mini-14
> and
> > on
> > > some models they're not always
> interchangeable.
> >
> >
> > First of all, thank you for your military
> service,
> > sir. Each day I tend to regret my military
> > sacrifice since the Dems take America's freedom
> > for granted.
> >
> > Second, if you have a 150 round revolving clip
> on
> > the AR-15, then one really doesn't need a
> bayonet.
> > The video of this item in action on You Tube
> > would make a Dems neck hair curl up even more.
> >
> > Ahooo-Ah !
>
> Since the thread was created to draw attention of
> an upcoming panic and pandemonium due to a
> perceived ammunition shortage,would you please
> inform G&A and the forum how he can stock and even
> load a 150 round revolving "clip"?
> Any information provided could be beneficial.
> Even tho G&A and I had a spirited discussion on
> the amount of weapons and their usage,I feel he is
> an excellant marksman and has a vast knowledge of
> tools of the trade. Therefore 150 rounds might be
> a bit of overkill for the gentleman.
> With apologies,but I'm getting a small whiff of
> bullshit. Maybe more than a whiff.

I can't take anyone who uses the term "150 round revolving "clip"" seriously. It shows a total lack of knowledge of firearms and the military which is typical of the anti-s. Standard magazine for the M-16 in those days was 20 rds. There is a current argument as to whether a bayonet is effective or not but in those days we'd been taught from day one of it's importance. I've had a good laugh on this thread by imagining what it would be like to reload a "150 round revolving clip" when Charlie is coming through the wire. Oh yeah...

A noteworthy writer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> dianefinewhinezourhero Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > sign no true blooded progressive home wants to
> be
> > without:
> >
> > DEAR MISTER CRIMINAL:
> >
> > WE ARE PROUD PROGRESSIVES
> >
> > OURS IS A GUN-FREE HOME
> >
> > PLEASE VISIT US WHENEVER AND AS OFTEN AS YOU
> FEEL
> > LIKE IT.
> >
> > Our wife will present her ass to you.
> > OUr husband will blow you.
> > Our kids will help carry your loot to your get
> > away vehicle.
> > And our labrador retriever will wag its tail.
> >
> > The wife looks forward to your return visits
> > because darling husband can't keep it up.
>
> A fine post. Did you stay up late to write this
> work of satire? America needs more creative
> thinkers such as yourself.
> Please don't handle any sharp objects are loaded
> weapons in your state of mind.
> God Bless....anyone who has or will have to
> associate with you.


nut worthy: I touched a nerve did I? You're butt hurt because after the burglar buggered you the family retriever took a turn too. perversion ... progressives lead the way.

>
You're butt hurt because after the burglar buggered you the
> family retriever took a turn too. perversion ...
> progressives lead the way.

Listen kid. You are immature and stupid. Perhaps you require some serious adult management. If you could pass the aptitude requirements,you should enlist in the Armed Forces. Might make a man out of you.
Now go beat off somewhere else.

Man up Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> If you
> could pass the aptitude requirements,you should
> enlist in the Armed Forces. Might make a man out
> of you.

Maybe twenty years ago, today the Army has soliders like Bradley, I mean Jessica, Manning to deal with. Might be the first time the Army made a woman out of a man.

Terry the Fairy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Man up Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > If you
> > could pass the aptitude requirements,you should
> > enlist in the Armed Forces. Might make a man
> out
> > of you.
>
> Maybe twenty years ago, today the Army has
> soliders like Bradley, I mean Jessica, Manning to
> deal with. Might be the first time the Army made a
> woman out of a man.

So Terry the fairy,they allow gays if they meet the requirements.
Good luck.

Man up Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> >
> You're butt hurt because after the burglar
> buggered you the
> > family retriever took a turn too. perversion
> ...
> > progressives lead the way.
>
> Listen kid. You are immature and stupid. Perhaps
> you require some serious adult management. If you
> could pass the aptitude requirements,you should
> enlist in the Armed Forces. Might make a man out
> of you.
> Now go beat off somewhere.

How stupid are you? Couldn't ya find a job that paid more than being the corporate fascists cannon fodder?

So did they make a man of you?

I'm 23 and I earn more than a colonel. And I'm fucking your wife. She's a moaner.

Go eat your .45 tough guy.

dianefinewhinezourhero Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> sign no true blooded progressive home wants to be
> without:
>
> DEAR MISTER CRIMINAL:
>
> WE ARE PROUD PROGRESSIVES
>
> OURS IS A GUN-FREE HOME
>
> PLEASE VISIT US WHENEVER AND AS OFTEN AS YOU FEEL
> LIKE IT.
>
> Our wife will present her ass to you.
> OUr husband will blow you.
> Our kids will help carry your loot to your get
> away vehicle.
> And our labrador retriever will wag its tail.
>
> The wife looks forward to your return visits
> because darling husband can't keep it up.


Let's hear from all the progressive gun grabber vermin here. Tell us where. Our talented install team will be around in a week or two to install your permanent yard sign. Walk your talk or shut up girls.

Sasquatch is getting ammo