Am I the only one who's sick and tired of the GIMPS monopoly of the prime number market!?

These guys have a stranglehold on prime number discovery... With their precious little Prime95 software... The ten largest known prime numbers in the world have been discovered by these faggots.

Let's show these computational cocksuckers that we're down, but not out... There's still prize money being offered for a bigger prime number. Let's put farfax undygrond on the numerical map...

I know it's not cock pics, but I'm sure we can all agree that it's the next best thing, right?

Whaddaya say? Who's with me!? I've got a pretty decent head start.. I'm already at 199! I mean 211... err... 223..

Also... if you know of any other "digital bounties", share'm here! Let's team together and fuck some internets up!

I've seen first hand how well we work as a team here... I have no doubts we're capable of this.

Any thoughts?

LET'S DO IT!

Edit: Don't worry, guys... I've already contacted chuckhoffmann and requested his assistance... The cavalry's a-comin'!!!

Signatures are for fags



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/02/2013 11:20PM by Harry Tuttle.

so... this conservative or liberal... i'm confused and not sure whether to support it or bash it.

for some reason i am very hesitant to click on your rinks.

Attachments:

They're just boring rinkages...

Nothing exciting...

Tricking people into clicking horrifying links ain't my style...

Signatures are for fags

bloody blisters Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> for some reason i am very hesitant to click on
> your rinks.

there as many prime numbers, as you want them to be. that's the beauty of science and nature, there's always one extra.

Those are my sentiments exactly, Fibonacci! So, can I mark you down as a volunteer in the Fairfax Underground Prime Association?

Who says these ghouls at GIMPS get to have all the recognition?

Fibonacci Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> there as many prime numbers, as you want them to
> be. that's the beauty of science and nature,
> there's always one extra.

Signatures are for fags

Harry Tuttle Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Those are my sentiments exactly, Fibonacci! So,
> can I mark you down as a volunteer in the Fairfax
> Underground Prime Association?
>
> Who says these ghouls at GIMPS get to have all the
> recognition?
>
> Fibonacci Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > there as many prime numbers, as you want them
> to
> > be. that's the beauty of science and nature,
> > there's always one extra.

when a number equals half it's prime, you can take the sum of that number and add it up all together to equal it's integers.

FYI: The links are web bugs.

tottally amazing Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> when a number equals half it's prime, you can take
> the sum of that number and add it up all together
> to equal it's integers.

I don't understand what you wrote... and I don't know if it's because you wrote it like an illegal alien with special needs... or if because what you wrote was mind-blowing... Care to show an example?

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FYI: The links are web bugs.

LOL! You say that about everybody's links... They're all clean links... The only one that has any type of "bugs" in it is the heavy-r link that's in the response to blisters...

Signatures are for fags

primes are used for searching for numberic / estimated solutions, and MatLab can find them quite fine

"The discovery is eligible for a $3,000 GIMPS research discovery award."

There is no such think as a Floridian who's been finding primes since 1995 and get's grant money LEGALLY.

Just another grant rip-off in FL so they can go to beach.

Meanwhile his sister is ripping off some old people doing 5 surgeries on paper only with no degree and billing it to you.

she'll fuck anyone but you, the one who got stuck paying finally

(note UCLA was taken over by a foreign country in 2007 and is now a democrat breeding ground and purveyor of green grants)

----------------------------------

Admin Email:woltman@alum.mit.edu
Tech ID:CR30466004
Tech Name:George Woltman
Tech Organization:Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search
Tech Street1:119 Magnolia St
Tech Street2:
Tech Street3:
Tech City:Windermere
Tech State/Province:Florida
Tech Postal Code:34786
Tech Country:US
Tech Phone:+1.4078760328

the hard part is knowing when to find which to avoid and endless search for sol'n: not how to find primes, not at all

Eraser,

Not sure exactly what you're talking about... What solution is worth $3,000?

A different group is offering $150,000 for a prime number (if it's large enough)...

Who fucks anyone?

Signatures are for fags

Harry Tuttle Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> They're just boring rinkages...
>
> Nothing exciting...
>
> Tricking people into clicking href="http://www.heavy-r.com/video/143369/Sex_With
> _Insects/">horrifying links ain't my style...


aw fuck, the one link i clicked was the one i shouldnt have.

Attachments:

Did you see the slugs?

bloody blisters Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> aw fuck, the one link i clicked was the one i
> shouldnt have.

Signatures are for fags

Harry Tuttle Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Did you see the slugs?
>
> bloody blisters Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > aw fuck, the one link i clicked was the one i
> > shouldnt have.


wouldnt load as quickly as i would have liked it to so i lost interest.

Attachments:

Harry Tuttle Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> tottally amazing Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > when a number equals half it's prime, you can
> take
> > the sum of that number and add it up all
> together
> > to equal it's integers.
>
> I don't understand what you wrote... and I don't
> know if it's because you wrote it like an illegal
> alien with special needs... or if because what you
> wrote was mind-blowing... Care to show an
> example?


suppose 'x' is the equivalent to half it's integer. you can take the prime of that number, and it's divisible by the total number of digits. same as explained above except in reverse. prime numbers are special in that way. you can calculate their sums in respect to their value divided by half.

Euler Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> suppose 'x' is the equivalent to half it's
> integer. you can take the prime of that number,
> and it's divisible by the total number of digits.
> same as explained above except in reverse. prime
> numbers are special in that way. you can
> calculate their sums in respect to their value
> divided by half.

I'm getting the feeling that you're full of shit... x equals half its (whatever "it" is) integer?

So you're saying x=x/2 ?? HUH!?

Then take the "prime" of that number? How do you take a prime of a given number?

Then you're saying that the prime is divisible by the total number of digits? I thought primes weren't divisible by anything but themselves (and 1)?

Calculate their sums "in respect" to their value divided in half? HUH!?

Let's take 7 for example... 7 is a prime... you're saying that seven is equal to 3.5?

Signatures are for fags

Harry Tuttle Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Euler Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > suppose 'x' is the equivalent to half it's
> > integer. you can take the prime of that
> number,
> > and it's divisible by the total number of
> digits.
> > same as explained above except in reverse.
> prime
> > numbers are special in that way. you can
> > calculate their sums in respect to their value
> > divided by half.
>
> I'm getting the feeling that you're full of
> shit... x equals half its (whatever "it" is)
> integer?
>
> So you're saying x=x/2 ?? HUH!?
>
> Then take the "prime" of that number? How do you
> take a prime of a given number?
>
> Then you're saying that the prime is divisible by
> the total number of digits? I thought primes
> weren't divisible by anything but themselves (and
> 1)?
>
> Calculate their sums "in respect" to their value
> divided in half? HUH!?
>
> Let's take 7 for example... 7 is a prime... you're
> saying that seven is equal to 3.5?

Not too good with numbers now, are ya?