It's been over three hours and Obama hasn't called the bombing in Boston a terrorist attack!

THIS IS ANOTHER BENGHAZI!

FIVE MINUTES AFTER THE ATTACK ROMNEY WOULD OF CALLED IT A TERRORIST ATTACK!!!

I think he's going to speak at 6:10. Let's wait to hear him.

I have you now.

Yes he is, although it would have been good to have heard from him earlier. Instead we got biden of all people.

Obama HAS NOT CALLED IT A TERRORIST ATTACK! He should of called it terrorist attack minutes after it happened!

noo see I think this has all the trademarks of .... Workplace violence

TERRORIST ATTACK!@ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Obama HAS NOT CALLED IT A TERRORIST ATTACK! He
> should of called it terrorist attack minutes after
> it happened!


I cannot stand Barack. I think he's a fucking idiot. But even worse would be a President, who came out and immediately said that, as a situation is fluid, and he hasn't got feedback from federal, state, and local teams.

TERRORIST ATTACK!@ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Obama HAS NOT CALLED IT A TERRORIST ATTACK! He
> should of called it terrorist attack minutes after
> it happened!


Would that really make you feel better?
Do you think it was a terrorist attack?
Were you sitting there thinking, "I can't be sure if this was a terrorist attack. I need the president to tell me so I can believe for sure."

WTF difference does it make whether he tells us it's a terrorist attack or not? Right now he probably knows as much as we do about it.

What if it is a terrorist attack? What do you think he should do? We don't even know who did it yet.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/15/2013 06:39PM by Numbers.

TERRORIST ATTACK!@ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Obama HAS NOT CALLED IT A TERRORIST ATTACK! He
> should of called it terrorist attack minutes after
> it happened!


Please... "man-made disaster."

and the crazy muslim major was classified as work place violence. So afraid of offending the sand people.

I was a terrorist attack. It has all trademarks. A secondary explosion timed to go off shortly after the first.

WHY HAS OBAMA SAID IT WAS A TERRORIST ATTACK AGAIN!

He did the same thing with BENGAHZI GATE now MARATHON GATE!!!!

*IT WAS A TERRORIST ATTACK!!!!*

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Would that really make you feel better?
> Do you think it was a terrorist attack?
> Were you sitting there thinking, "I can't be sure
> if this was a terrorist attack. I need the
> president to tell me so I can believe for sure."
>
> WTF difference does it make whether he tells us
> it's a terrorist attack or not? Right now he
> probably knows as much as we do about it.
>
> What if it is a terrorist attack? What do you
> think he should do? We don't even know who did it
> yet.

If you bomb things you are a terrorist period. It was an act of terrorism committed by a terrorist theres no what if

Liberal Logic 102 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Numbers Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Would that really make you feel better?
> > Do you think it was a terrorist attack?
> > Were you sitting there thinking, "I can't be
> sure
> > if this was a terrorist attack. I need the
> > president to tell me so I can believe for
> sure."
> >
> > WTF difference does it make whether he tells us
> > it's a terrorist attack or not? Right now he
> > probably knows as much as we do about it.
> >
> > What if it is a terrorist attack? What do you
> > think he should do? We don't even know who did
> it
> > yet.
>
> If you bomb things you are a terrorist period. It
> was an act of terrorism committed by a terrorist
> theres no what if


If you and everyone else was so sure, then why do you need Obama to tell you that? How fast do you need him to tell you?

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> If you and everyone else was so sure, then why do
> you need Obama to tell you that? How fast do you
> need him to tell you?


Why can't he say the T word?

Mr. T Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Why can't he say the T word?


Why does it matter? Do the terms Murder, Tragedy, disaster, ect... not do it for you? Isn't all murder an act of terrorism? Why are you so obsessed with terminology?

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> If you and everyone else was so sure, then why do
> you need Obama to tell you that? How fast do you
> need him to tell you?


Because him not calling a spade a spade is absurd. It leaves room for him to apologize for it like it was somehow our fault or blame something else like guns get blamed for crazy people.

Why cant he call a terrorist a terrorist whats the big deal?

Why cant he lead for once? Why cant he come out and say we were hit by a terrorist well find out who it was and bring them to justice and help boston recover. Why is it we have to wait and see all the time. Hes always leading from behind. Or do you think Bush should have said we need to wait for all the facts before he called 9-11 a terrorist attack as well?

Liberal Logic 102 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Why cant he call a terrorist a terrorist whats the
> big deal?
>
> Why is it we have to wait and see all the time.
>
> Or do you think Bush should have said we need to wait for all the facts before
> he called 9-11 a terrorist attack as well?

lol.

quick, turn on Fox News, I heard they have footage of Trayvon Martin's dad fleeing the scene wearing an ACORN tshirt.

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mr. T Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Why can't he say the T word?
>
>
> Why does it matter? Do the terms Murder, Tragedy,
> disaster, ect... not do it for you? Isn't all
> murder an act of terrorism? Why are you so
> obsessed with terminology?


Because it reflects ideological denial. Which is more dangerous in itself than PC word games. Same with Napolitano, Holder, Rice and others in his admin who are responsible for dealing with TERRORISM. Denying it doesn't make it go away. Pretending for politically correct reasons that some groups aren't intent on killing Americans doesn't change that they are. It leads to inappropriate and ineffective policy and decision making.

Liberal Logic 102 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Numbers Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > If you and everyone else was so sure, then why
> do
> > you need Obama to tell you that? How fast do
> you
> > need him to tell you?
>
>
> Because him not calling a spade a spade is absurd.
> It leaves room for him to apologize for it like
> it was somehow our fault or blame something else
> like guns get blamed for crazy people.
>
> Why cant he call a terrorist a terrorist whats the
> big deal?
>
> Why cant he lead for once? Why cant he come out
> and say we were hit by a terrorist well find out
> who it was and bring them to justice and help
> boston recover. Why is it we have to wait and see
> all the time. Hes always leading from behind. Or
> do you think Bush should have said we need to wait
> for all the facts before he called 9-11 a
> terrorist attack as well?

Your absolutely right. We need George Bush's bravado right now. Then we can invade some foreign country that had nothing to do with this, destroy it, and kill thousands of our own troops in the false pursuit of justice.

Mr. T Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Denying it doesn't make it go
> away.

He never denied it. Maybe he didn't want to rush to judgement until he had more info? Isn't that the right thing to do? In your view, how long should it take him to shout "Terrorism". 3 hours? 30 minutes?


> Pretending for politically correct reasons
> that some groups aren't intent on killing
> Americans doesn't change that they are. It leads
> to inappropriate and ineffective policy and
> decision making.

LOL!!!

Good Point Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Your absolutely right. We need George Bush's
> bravado right now. Then we can invade some foreign
> country that had nothing to do with this, destroy
> it, and kill thousands of our own troops in the
> false pursuit of justice.


Your right, who cares that every intelligence agency in the world had the same intel or that he had 4 months to move or destroy/bury chem weapons it was all evil Bushs fault. He shouldnt have called 9-11 a terrorist attack at all.

You arent too bright are you? Things go over your head a lot?

Good job changing the subject though to deflect from the fact that we have a President who refuses to call terrorism terrorism

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ni8a8GxHre0


didnt say much

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> He never denied it. Maybe he didn't want to rush
> to judgement until he had more info? Isn't that
> the right thing to do? In your view, how long
> should it take him to shout "Terrorism". 3 hours?
> 30 minutes?

Its a bombing it should have taken how ever long it took an adviser to tell him it was a bombing to know it was a terrorist attack. He should have said so whenever he made his first speech.

Its not rocket science. If you bomb civilians you are a terrorist and its a terrorist act.

everyone knows it was terrorism whether homegrown or otherwise but what difference does it make if he says it or not?

ok ok Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> everyone knows it was terrorism whether homegrown
> or otherwise but what difference does it make if
> he says it or not?


If it makes no difference why cant he say it?

He has a long history of not calling terrorism terrorism thats very troubling. The fact that he cant say it is a sign of weakness as well.

i just dont see why it matters to you or whoever else has a problem with it. he doesnt want to frighten americans even more so by calling it terrorism. most people's mind will go to more war, more death..oh wait..that's already happening..

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mr. T Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Denying it doesn't make it go
> > away.
>
> He never denied it. Maybe he didn't want to rush
> to judgement until he had more info? Isn't that
> the right thing to do? In your view, how long
> should it take him to shout "Terrorism". 3 hours?
> 30 minutes?
>
>
> > Pretending for politically correct reasons
> > that some groups aren't intent on killing
> > Americans doesn't change that they are. It
> leads
> > to inappropriate and ineffective policy and
> > decision making.
>
> LOL!!!


When two bombs go off at a major public event killing and injuring civilians what would you call it? "Man-made disaster?" I should post the vids of Napolitano and Holder having to choke out the word during hearings. LOL indeed.

You think that pretending that Benghazi was about some dumbass video that nobody even saw instead of the real causes was effective policy? Other than for limiting political damage anyway. Which seems to be Obama's and his admin's primary concern in all cases.

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> quick, turn on Fox News, I heard they have
> footage of Trayvon Martin's dad fleeing the scene
> wearing an ACORN tshirt.

That Trayvon boy looked like the son I didn't have.

I wish I had a boy who was innocently shot down by a white man, with all that racism rage white boys have boggled up in their tiny testicles.

Meeper, I hate Fox news, too. Watch MSNBC.

I like you, boy.

ok ok Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> i just dont see why it matters to you or whoever
> else has a problem with it. he doesnt want to
> frighten americans even more so by calling it
> terrorism. most people's mind will go to more war,
> more death..oh wait..that's already happening..


It has nothing to do with frightening people and everything to do with this new ultra left notion that were somehow to blame for what happens like the bullshit blaming Youtube for Bengazi or that theyre freedom fighters. A terrorist is a terrorist is a terrorist. Leaving yourself room to be an apologist for such a heinous act is truly disgusting. Its a very disturbing pattern of behavior that shows he will not call terrorism terrorism until backed into a corner with no other choice

Why do niggers always have underbites ?

bsma Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why do niggers always have underbites ?


Why do liberals love evil?

Liberal Logic 102 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Good Point Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Your absolutely right. We need George Bush's
> > bravado right now. Then we can invade some
> foreign
> > country that had nothing to do with this,
> destroy
> > it, and kill thousands of our own troops in the
> > false pursuit of justice.
>
>
> Your right, who cares that every intelligence
> agency in the world had the same intel or that he
> had 4 months to move or destroy/bury chem weapons
> it was all evil Bushs fault. He shouldnt have
> called 9-11 a terrorist attack at all.
>
> You arent too bright are you? Things go over your
> head a lot?
>
> Good job changing the subject though to deflect
> from the fact that we have a President who refuses
> to call terrorism terrorism

Been drinking? Political drunks are hilarious.

A part of me hopes this was another Tim McVey just so douches like the OP has to eat shit and die.

Romney Would OF! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's been over three hours and Obama hasn't called
> the bombing in Boston a terrorist attack!
>
> THIS IS ANOTHER BENGHAZI!
>
> FIVE MINUTES AFTER THE ATTACK ROMNEY WOULD OF
> CALLED IT A TERRORIST ATTACK!!!


Careful now, Tax Day, Patriot Day, April attack like Waco and Oklahoma City. Most liberal city of the most liberal state in the union attacked. This is an act of Terror and the White House has said as such along with federal agencies now taking the lead in the investigation as a result.

But, you and your kind just may end up being the terrorists here OP.

My guess is it's some guy that hates runners and the Boston Marathon. Maybe he's sick of the roads being closed down.

I can see some crazy nutjob getting pissed off that all these runners and athletic people are giddy smiling and jumping around the town.

I don't think this a foreign terrorist attack. It's best for the President of the United States to be accurate.

carefulnow Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Careful now, Tax Day, Patriot Day, April attack
> like Waco and Oklahoma City. Most liberal city of
> the most liberal state in the union attacked.
> This is an act of Terror and the White House has
> said as such along with federal agencies now
> taking the lead in the investigation as a result.

But the president hasnt, again just like Bengazi all over again.

It was tax day but usually separatists bomb fed buildings not public events, the first thought for the bombing mo wouldnt be that. Either way its still an act of terror. If you bomb things you are a terrorist.

> But, you and your kind just may end up being the
> terrorists here OP.

Not sure what that means. Calling the president out for that doesnt make you a terrorist. Bombing things does.

Mr. Cloonan said that an FBI evidence response team would have been at the scene since Monday, sifting the rubble for clues. “They’ve got to be able to tell how [the bombs] were made and what of,” he said.

Al Qaeda and other extremists “will take responsibility, if they did it,” he said, but domestic terrorists such as anarchist or anti-government militia groups tend not to.

Islamic extremist groups claimed responsibility for the last two bombing attempts on U.S. soil within 72 hours, said Ben Venzke, CEO of IntelCenter, which monitors and analyzes terrorist communications.

The Pakistani Taliban claimed the bungled 2010 attempted bombing of Times Square by Faisal Shahzad in less then 24 hours via video. Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula claimed the 2009 Christmas underwear bombing attempt by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab within 72 hours in a written statement.

SEE RELATED: Police search Mass. apt. in Boston Marathon bomb investigation
The Pakistani Taliban said in a Tuesday statement they did not conduct the bombing, although they welcomed it.

“No credible claim of responsibility has been identified yet,” Mr. Venzke said in a statement.

Mr. Cloonan said no one should jump to conclusions.

“I’ve seen these devices [in Boston] called rudimentary, crude, unsophisticated … I never like to use those terms,” he said.

“These devices were powerful enough to shred limbs, lethal enough to kill people … The person or people that did this were very smart,” said Mr. Cloonan, who retired from the FBI in 2002 and is now head of the special risks team at Red24, a U.K.-based security firm.

APRIL 16--With reports that the Boston Marathon bombs were likely a pressure cooker device, a previous Department of Homeland Security information bulletin is worth revisiting.

The 2004 DHS report warns of the “potential terrorist use of pressure cookers,” adding that there was “continued interest by terrorist organizations to use innocuous items to package improvised explosive devices (IEDs).”

A federal law enforcement update on pressure cooker bombs was issued in mid-2010, after agents broke up a terror plot targeting New York City’s Times Square. “One of three devices seized after the attempted attack incorporated a pressure cooker containing approximately 120 firecrackers,” investigators noted in the July 1 memo prepared by DHS and FBI agents.

First of all, it's "he should have" not "he should of".

Second, it's obviously an act of terror. What else could it be? If I were the POTUS, I would hesitate to use the T word because people automatically assume "islamic extremists" when they hear it. This is because of the ultra-conservative main stream media like FOX.

Third, I am willing to bet that if they ever find out who did this (which I doubt) it will end up being a white, tea party extremist.

I told you guys it was firecrackers.

fivestroke Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> First of all, it's "he should have" not "he should
> of".
>
> Second, it's obviously an act of terror. What
> else could it be? If I were the POTUS, I would
> hesitate to use the T word because people
> automatically assume "islamic extremists" when
> they hear it. This is because of the
> ultra-conservative main stream media like FOX.
>
> Third, I am willing to bet that if they ever find
> out who did this (which I doubt) it will end up
> being a white, tea party extremist.

Fourth I am 100 percent sure you are a complete idiot and a partisan hack.

Fifth Im 90 percent sure your a terrorist apologist who thinks we cause their attacks and view them as freedom fighters

Sixth people assume its an islamic terrorist when you use the terrorist word because the overwhelming majority of terrorists are Arab Muslims. Now you can mention McVey and the Atlanta Olympic Bomber and the guy who flew the plane into the IRS building, the unibomber and congrats you come up with 4 who werent compared to 1000s that are

fivestroke Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Third, I am willing to bet that if they ever find
> out who did this (which I doubt) it will end up
> being a white, tea party extremist.


I wouldn't put money on that bet. The Olympic bomber was thought to be terrorist because he bombed the Olympics.

It turned out to be Eric Ruddoplh, some Christian abortion extremist.

fivestroke Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> First of all, it's "he should have" not "he should
> of".
>
> Second, it's obviously an act of terror. What
> else could it be? If I were the POTUS, I would
> hesitate to use the T word because people
> automatically assume "islamic extremists" when
> they hear it. This is because of the
> ultra-conservative main stream media like FOX.
>
> Third, I am willing to bet that if they ever find
> out who did this (which I doubt) it will end up
> being a white, tea party extremist.


I'm willing to bet you're a left-wing whack-job. People like you should be rounded up and held in internment camps. You ARE the enemy.

Liberal Logic 102 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> carefulnow Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Careful now, Tax Day, Patriot Day, April attack
> > like Waco and Oklahoma City. Most liberal city
> of
> > the most liberal state in the union attacked.
> > This is an act of Terror and the White House
> has
> > said as such along with federal agencies now
> > taking the lead in the investigation as a
> result.
>
> But the president hasnt, again just like Bengazi
> all over again.
>
> It was tax day but usually separatists bomb fed
> buildings not public events, the first thought for
> the bombing mo wouldnt be that. Either way its
> still an act of terror. If you bomb things you
> are a terrorist.
>
> > But, you and your kind just may end up being
> the
> > terrorists here OP.
>
> Not sure what that means. Calling the president
> out for that doesnt make you a terrorist. Bombing
> things does.

Fuck you and Benghazi. 4 men got killed and you make a big deal out of this.
Grow up. What the hell is your problem?

Get a job Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Fuck you and Benghazi. 4 men got killed and you
> make a big deal out of this.
> Grow up. What the hell is your problem?

Yes grow up is right. People were killed by a terrorist act and a youtube video was attempted to be made into the fall guy apologizing for murderers.

To normal human beings thats an issue. Its sad how angry you liberals get about the truth and how you bend over backwards trying to apologize for terrorists and Obama. Those dead people deserved a lot better than they got in both life and how its been handled after their death

Still waiting for Al Qaeda to take credit. Seems obvious it was some right wing home grown jihadist just like McVeigh, Kazinkski, and all the other douches in the south

white extremist did it Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Still waiting for Al Qaeda to take credit. Seems
> obvious it was some right wing home grown jihadist
> just like McVeigh, Kazinkski, and all the other
> douches in the south


The fact that thats the first thought of you liberals just proves the point of being terrorist apologists.

If you have nothing to go on you go on what you know and whats most likely.

What we know is that bombings are overwhelmingly not separatists.

Separatists bomb federal buildings not civilians. They dont use small bombs loaded with ball bearings which is the exact mo of bombings that happen all the time in Isreal.

They dont want to hurt their fellow citizens they want to hurt the government, this bombing was designed to inflict harm on civilians.

Without a suspect going on the type of bombing it doesnt suggest a separatist at all unless thats what your political beliefs want it to be. Until proven otherwise the first bet would be a typical terrorist attack not a separatist.

Its sad you liberals have to politicize everything and even sadder when your just talking out of your ass and know nothing of which you speak.

Some can be bombers and still be good people, just ask obama
Attachments:

The difference:

Conservatives: Bombing was the work of terrorist. Some Arab guy wearing a turbine who is Muslim.

Liberals: Let's see what the FBI and ATF figure out from the evidence.

Difference Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The difference:
>
> Conservatives: Bombing was the work of terrorist.
> Some Arab guy wearing a turbine who is Muslim.
>
> Liberals: Let's see what the FBI and ATF figure
> out from the evidence.


Bullshit. The libs like Matthews were out in front calling it domestic before the smoke had even cleared. lol

Difference Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The difference:
> Liberals: Let's see what the FBI and ATF figure
> out from the evidence.


Really, the New Years Eve Times Square bombing comes to mind. Liberals were spouting it was a Tea Party member angry at obamacare. Is that how you waited for the FBI?
Attachments:

oh rly Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Difference Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The difference:
> > Liberals: Let's see what the FBI and ATF
> figure
> > out from the evidence.
>
>
> Really, the New Years Eve Times Square bombing
> comes to mind. Liberals were spouting it was a Tea
> Party member angry at obamacare. Is that how you
> waited for the FBI?

They were? I must of missed that...

Muslims and Left-wingers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fivestroke Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > First of all, it's "he should have" not "he
> should
> > of".
> >
> > Second, it's obviously an act of terror. What
> > else could it be? If I were the POTUS, I would
> > hesitate to use the T word because people
> > automatically assume "islamic extremists" when
> > they hear it. This is because of the
> > ultra-conservative main stream media like FOX.
> >
> > Third, I am willing to bet that if they ever
> find
> > out who did this (which I doubt) it will end up
> > being a white, tea party extremist.
>
>
> I'm willing to bet you're a left-wing whack-job.
> People like you should be rounded up and held in
> internment camps. You ARE the enemy.

Except us Liberals are building the internment camps! Remember? Glen Beck told you this. Don't get angry at me. I'm the voice of reason here. I'm not calling for internment camps.

It's some quack who doesn't like the Boston Marathon. Nothing more than that.

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Liberal Logic 102 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > Why cant he call a terrorist a terrorist whats
> the
> > big deal?
> >
> > Why is it we have to wait and see all the time.
>
> >
> > Or do you think Bush should have said we need to
> wait for all the facts before
> > he called 9-11 a terrorist attack as well?
>
> lol.
>
> quick, turn on Fox News, I heard they have
> footage of Trayvon Martin's dad fleeing the scene
> wearing an ACORN tshirt.


This bombing was the result of a youtube video that nobody saw. LoLz.

Difference Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The difference:
>
> Conservatives: Bombing was the work of terrorist.
> Some Arab guy wearing a turbine who is Muslim.

More like bombing was the work of a terrorist, likely muslim going off the probability of terrorism but dont know yet.

> Liberals: Let's see what the FBI and ATF figure
> out from the evidence.

You need the FBI and ATF to tell you a bombing is a terrorist act? Have you guys lost all ability to think for yourselfs or use common sense?

Blame Youtube Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> This bombing was the result of a youtube video
> that nobody saw. LoLz.


Good call!

"Any time bombs are used to target innocent civilians, it is an act of terror" Obama said Tuesday morning.

Obama STILL hasn't called the Boston Bombing a terrorist attack!!!!!

WHY IS OBAMA HIDING ALL THE INFORMATION HE HAS ON WHO ATTACKED THE US!!!!!

Possible bomber picture released. Looks like a white male in military uniform.
Attachments:

Pic Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Possible bomber picture released. Looks like a
> white male in military uniform.

Released by who? This just looks like a guy walking away from the scene. And I don't see a uniform.

Pic Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Possible bomber picture released. Looks like a
> white male in military uniform.


Maybe.

Im going to go out on a limb though and say the bomber wouldnt have been standing in the smoke or been that close to the explosion.

Remember the Atlanta bombing where for years people thought the security guard did it and it wasnt till like 7 years later they figured out who it really was.

Liberal Logic 102 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Difference Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The difference:
> >
> > Conservatives: Bombing was the work of
> terrorist.
> > Some Arab guy wearing a turbine who is Muslim.
>
> More like bombing was the work of a terrorist,
> likely muslim going off the probability of
> terrorism but dont know yet.
>
> > Liberals: Let's see what the FBI and ATF
> figure
> > out from the evidence.
>
> You need the FBI and ATF to tell you a bombing is
> a terrorist act? Have you guys lost all ability
> to think for yourselfs or use common sense?

Still pushing that this must be an islamic person? Even though not a single group has taken credit for it, which is ALWAYS what happens if it was them because they want the notability they want the respect of other terrorist groups.

The stinks to high heaven of a single person or an anarchist group, but by all means please keep praying that Fox is right, as they were with the election. The real question is, why are you so rabid to say it was an arab before fuckin letting the process figure it out. Do you think only arabs are terrorists? I have more than 2 dozen examples that would discredit that concept including several already noted in this thread.

But of course, as always white people are angels and could never harm someone else. You know because abortion clinic bombings, rapings, murders are all constructs of the brown man. No reason why a white person would ever attack boston mass on tax day. Duh

Point is, you dont know shit about who it is, and the fact that you think the leading suspect group is islamist shows you are about as far away from national security knowledge as Rush Limbaugh who know one would ever trust with important info.

Rush Limbaugh and Beck just about had orgasms on the air when they found out it happened.

Conservatives sure do like to see Americans in pain.

GOP gets boner from bombs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Still pushing that this must be an islamic person?
> Even though not a single group has taken credit
> for it, which is ALWAYS what happens if it was
> them because they want the notability they want
> the respect of other terrorist groups.
>
> The stinks to high heaven of a single person or an
> anarchist group, but by all means please keep
> praying that Fox is right, as they were with the
> election. The real question is, why are you so
> rabid to say it was an arab before fuckin letting
> the process figure it out. Do you think only arabs
> are terrorists? I have more than 2 dozen examples
> that would discredit that concept including
> several already noted in this thread.
>
> But of course, as always white people are angels
> and could never harm someone else. You know
> because abortion clinic bombings, rapings, murders
> are all constructs of the brown man. No reason why
> a white person would ever attack boston mass on
> tax day. Duh
>
> Point is, you dont know shit about who it is, and
> the fact that you think the leading suspect group
> is islamist shows you are about as far away from
> national security knowledge as Rush Limbaugh who
> know one would ever trust with important info.

Gerry go back to using your normal name.

I didnt comment on what the possible suspect would be. Its likely its someone with ties to an islamic group.

Why the obsession with Fox news for reporting facts?

You liberals sure are terrified of them for not towing the party line.

If your not gerry it just shows how stupid you all have become. All you do is say the exact same things over and over and over and over. Group think has never lead to anything but disaster and the oppression/murder of people but who cares as long as its for the greater good right comrade?

Its you liberals who are stroking off hoping it a white male and making claims that it couldnt possible be someone who isnt.

But youre too stupid and insecure to see that I never said it had to be a muslim, I didnt even comment on the potential race or who it would be all I said was its unlike the bomber was standing next to it when it went off and you go on a rant.

I dont know whats more prevalent, your stupidity or hatred of anyone who isnt brain washed.

Nobody should be jumping to conclusions yet. There's no proof of any direct terrorism.

This leads me to believe that it is American Whack job trying to make it look a terrorist act.

BUT, we don't know yet. Let the FBI and ATF do their jobs. That's what we pay them for.

Dr Yes Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nobody should be jumping to conclusions yet.
> There's no proof of any direct terrorism.
>
> This leads me to believe that it is American Whack
> job trying to make it look a terrorist act.
>
> BUT, we don't know yet. Let the FBI and ATF do
> their jobs. That's what we pay them for.


So you complain about people jumping to conclusions...

and then present your own conclusion that it's an American whack job.

lol

Damn they found the bitches. Two whack job teens from Russia.

Damn it! Looks like Obama is correct again! Damn it!

As somewhat of an aside - I think it is FASCINATING that so many radical Islamic groups not only have NOT taken credit, but absolutely and in NO uncertain terms have practically shouted:

>>> "It wasn't us! It wasn't us! We had nothing to do with this! It wasn't us!"

Remotely Piloted Vehicles are having a psychological effect, huh?

==========

It looks like it was a crazy and his (gullible?) teenybopper brother. Period.

==========

The guy obviously had strong emotional problems; one doesn't post a whine on one's web page decrying a lack of American friends after years of being amongst them without having serious emotional problems.

Olde Farte, II Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As somewhat of an aside - I think it is
> FASCINATING that so many radical Islamic groups
> not only have NOT taken credit, but absolutely and
> in NO uncertain terms have practically shouted:
>
> >>> "It wasn't us! It wasn't us! We had nothing to
> do with this! It wasn't us!"
>
> Remotely Piloted Vehicles are having a
> psychological effect, huh?
>
> ==========
>
> It looks like it was a crazy and his (gullible?)
> teenybopper brother. Period.
>
> ==========
>
> The guy obviously had strong emotional problems;
> one doesn't post a whine on one's web page
> decrying a lack of American friends after years of
> being amongst them without having serious
> emotional problems.


Uh yeah... Just some crazy guy...

Who had links to radical Islamic content all over his online info...

And who was by all reports a devout Muslim...

And who went back to a known region for 6 months last year...

And who "just happened" to use the exact same method typically used by the same groups...

You libs really are getting laughably desperate to try to blame ANYTHING other than radical Islam.

Pesky facts Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Olde Farte, II Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > As somewhat of an aside - I think it is
> > FASCINATING that so many radical Islamic groups
> > not only have NOT taken credit, but absolutely
> and
> > in NO uncertain terms have practically shouted:
> >
> > >>> "It wasn't us! It wasn't us! We had nothing
> to
> > do with this! It wasn't us!"
> >
> > Remotely Piloted Vehicles are having a
> > psychological effect, huh?
> >
> > ==========
> >
> > It looks like it was a crazy and his
> (gullible?)
> > teenybopper brother. Period.
> >
> > ==========
> >
> > The guy obviously had strong emotional
> problems;
> > one doesn't post a whine on one's web page
> > decrying a lack of American friends after years
> of
> > being amongst them without having serious
> > emotional problems.
>
>
> Uh yeah... Just some crazy guy...
>
> Who had links to radical Islamic content all over
> his online info...
>
> And who was by all reports a devout Muslim...
>
> And who went back to a known region for 6 months
> last year...
>
> And who "just happened" to use the exact same
> method typically used by the same groups...
>
> You libs really are getting laughably desperate to
> try to blame ANYTHING other than radical Islam.

Nobody is saying the attack wasn't a religious attack. 80% of bombing or shootings are religiously based.

The Olympic bombing in Atlanta was based on religion and ideology.

The Uni-bomber also based his attacks on on his own faith against machines.

Were the Uni-bomber, Olympic and Oklahoma bombings also terrorism?

I would say no.

Romney Would OF! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's been over three hours and Obama hasn't called
> the bombing in Boston a terrorist attack!
>
> THIS IS ANOTHER BENGHAZI!
>
> FIVE MINUTES AFTER THE ATTACK ROMNEY WOULD OF
> CALLED IT A TERRORIST ATTACK!!!


55% of America voted to not hear what Romney had to say!

Easy Peasy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Nobody is saying the attack wasn't a religious
> attack. 80% of bombing or shootings are
> religiously based.
>
> The Olympic bombing in Atlanta was based on
> religion and ideology.
>
> The Uni-bomber also based his attacks on on his
> own faith against machines.
>
> Were the Uni-bomber, Olympic and Oklahoma bombings
> also terrorism?
>
> I would say no.


Sure they are. They're attempting to portray it as a "lone wolf" attack to separate it from Islamic terrorism (*GASP* Yes, I said the dreaded banned words).

Yes, all of the example which you mention are considered within the definition of terrorism. Although in this case it appears to be so, terrorism does not have to be religiously based. It can also be and often is political, etc. (e.g., Weather Underground, eco-terrorism, etc.)

Pesky Facts Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ...They're attempting to portray it as a "lone wolf" attack...

True.

It was a lone wolf attack by a flake and his brother.

Olde Farte, II Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Pesky Facts Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ...They're attempting to portray it as a "lone
> wolf" attack...
>
> True.
>
> It was a lone wolf attack by a flake and his
> brother.


Who had links to radical Islamic content all over his online info...

And who was by all reports a devout Muslim...

And who went back to a known region for 6 months last year...

And who "just happened" to use the exact same method typically used by the same groups...

And who now have reportedly admitted that they were driven by hate for US policy re wars against Muslim peoples...

If you can't see the common thread here, then you're more blind than the Blind Sheik. Or just in liberal denial.

Everything you have described perfectly fits the lone wolf flake.

BTW, the authorities have said they were lone wolve flakes.

Sometimes it's just crazies, not conspiracies.

Olde Farte, II Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Everything you have described perfectly fits the
> lone wolf flake.
>
> BTW, the authorities have said they were lone
> wolve flakes.
>
> Sometimes it's just crazies, not conspiracies.


Your blinders appear to be keeping you from seeing the point here.

Acting independently versus being part of some state-sponsored conspiracy doesn't change the fact that the basis for the attack is radical Islamism. (And, actually, whether they may have had various forms of support is yet to be determined.)

It was not just a case of a couple of "flakes."

They knew what they were doing. They had a very specific religious/political motivation and rationale based in radical Islamism. As have all of the similar terrorists who have made and/or attempted similar attacks in the name of radical Islamism.