Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
misinformation?
()
Date: February 22, 2013 07:09PM
lizzie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If the police don't handle it I WILL! Personally.
> I don't give a fuck about going back to jail.
> Trust me! I'm not stupid enough to do anything to
> the little punk bitch. Cary already said he would
> comply, this will be taken care of the adult way
This is what I am asking about -
"Cary already said he would comply"
So, what say Cary?
-------------------------------------------------------
> If the police don't handle it I WILL! Personally.
> I don't give a fuck about going back to jail.
> Trust me! I'm not stupid enough to do anything to
> the little punk bitch. Cary already said he would
> comply, this will be taken care of the adult way
This is what I am asking about -
"Cary already said he would comply"
So, what say Cary?
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
someone is getting worried
()
Date: February 22, 2013 07:12PM
That?
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
No such thing
()
Date: February 22, 2013 07:25PM
You're not as anonymous as you think.
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
Not worried
()
Date: February 22, 2013 08:13PM
I am almost certain Cary won't reply to this thread but you shouldn't have anything to worry about if you haven't taken part of any of the Lizzie drama. I do think it may be time to put it to rest and give her the benefit of the doubt with this one. I don't see why she would go to Cary if this was all made up.
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
By law
()
Date: February 22, 2013 08:40PM
§ 19.2-267.2. Response to subpoena for information stored in electronic format.
When a subpoena has been served pursuant to Rule 3A:12 of the Rules of the Supreme Court on a person who is not a
party to the action requiring the production of information that is stored in an electronic format, the person shall produce a
tangible copy of the information. If a tangible copy cannot be produced, the person shall permit the parties to review the
information on a computer or by electronic means during normal business hours, provided that the information can be
accessed and isolated. If a tangible copy cannot reasonably be produced and the information is commingled with information
other than that requested in the subpoena and cannot reasonably be isolated, the person may file a motion for a protective
order or motion to quash.
When a subpoena has been served pursuant to Rule 3A:12 of the Rules of the Supreme Court on a person who is not a
party to the action requiring the production of information that is stored in an electronic format, the person shall produce a
tangible copy of the information. If a tangible copy cannot be produced, the person shall permit the parties to review the
information on a computer or by electronic means during normal business hours, provided that the information can be
accessed and isolated. If a tangible copy cannot reasonably be produced and the information is commingled with information
other than that requested in the subpoena and cannot reasonably be isolated, the person may file a motion for a protective
order or motion to quash.
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
By law
()
Date: February 22, 2013 08:48PM
[a]ny person who uses obscene, vulgar, profane, lewd, lascivious, or indecent language, or makes any suggestion or proposal of an obscene nature, or threatens any illegal or immoral act with the intent to coerce, intimidate, or harass any person, over any telephone or citizens band radio, in this Commonwealth, is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
CvXve
()
Date: February 22, 2013 08:51PM
"lawful subpoena"
not with lizzies wishes, as she would have you think
chances of a subpoena that has Cary giving a posters private information = ZERO
so more bullshit as usual
not with lizzies wishes, as she would have you think
chances of a subpoena that has Cary giving a posters private information = ZERO
so more bullshit as usual
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
By Law
()
Date: February 22, 2013 08:53PM
A provider of electronic communication service or remote computing service, including a foreign corporation that provides
such services, shall disclose the contents of electronic communications to an investigative or law-enforcement officer only
pursuant to a search warrant issued by a magistrate, a juvenile and domestic relations district court, a general district court,
or a circuit court, based upon complaint on oath supported by an affidavit as required in § 19.2-54, or judicial officer or court
of any of the several states of the United States or its territories, or the District of Columbia when the warrant issued by
such officer or such court complies with the provisions of subsection E. In the case of a search warrant directed to a foreign
corporation the affidavit shall state that the complainant believes that
such services, shall disclose the contents of electronic communications to an investigative or law-enforcement officer only
pursuant to a search warrant issued by a magistrate, a juvenile and domestic relations district court, a general district court,
or a circuit court, based upon complaint on oath supported by an affidavit as required in § 19.2-54, or judicial officer or court
of any of the several states of the United States or its territories, or the District of Columbia when the warrant issued by
such officer or such court complies with the provisions of subsection E. In the case of a search warrant directed to a foreign
corporation the affidavit shall state that the complainant believes that
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
By law
()
Date: February 22, 2013 08:54PM
A court shall issue an order for disclosure under this section only if the investigative or law-enforcement officer shows
that there is reason to believe the records or other information sought are relevant and material to an ongoing criminal
investigation,
that there is reason to believe the records or other information sought are relevant and material to an ongoing criminal
investigation,
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
px4tN
()
Date: February 22, 2013 08:54PM
By Law Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A provider of electronic communication service or
> remote computing service, including a foreign
> corporation that provides
> such services, shall disclose the contents of
> electronic communications to an investigative or
> law-enforcement officer only
> pursuant to a search warrant issued by a
> magistrate, a juvenile and domestic relations
> district court, a general district court,
> or a circuit court, based upon complaint on oath
> supported by an affidavit as required in §
> 19.2-54, or judicial officer or court
> of any of the several states of the United States
> or its territories, or the District of Columbia
> when the warrant issued by
> such officer or such court complies with the
> provisions of subsection E. In the case of a
> search warrant directed to a foreign
> corporation the affidavit shall state that the
> complainant believes that
exactly
zero chance
-------------------------------------------------------
> A provider of electronic communication service or
> remote computing service, including a foreign
> corporation that provides
> such services, shall disclose the contents of
> electronic communications to an investigative or
> law-enforcement officer only
> pursuant to a search warrant issued by a
> magistrate, a juvenile and domestic relations
> district court, a general district court,
> or a circuit court, based upon complaint on oath
> supported by an affidavit as required in §
> 19.2-54, or judicial officer or court
> of any of the several states of the United States
> or its territories, or the District of Columbia
> when the warrant issued by
> such officer or such court complies with the
> provisions of subsection E. In the case of a
> search warrant directed to a foreign
> corporation the affidavit shall state that the
> complainant believes that
exactly
zero chance
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
By law
()
Date: February 22, 2013 08:56PM
§ 18.2-152.12. Civil relief; damages.
A. Any person whose property or person is injured by reason of a violation of any provision of this article or by any act of
computer trespass set forth in subdivisions A 1 through A 8 of § 18.2-152.4 regardless of whether such act is committed
with malicious intent may sue therefor and recover for any damages sustained and the costs of suit. Without limiting the
generality of the term, “damages” shall include loss of profits
A. Any person whose property or person is injured by reason of a violation of any provision of this article or by any act of
computer trespass set forth in subdivisions A 1 through A 8 of § 18.2-152.4 regardless of whether such act is committed
with malicious intent may sue therefor and recover for any damages sustained and the costs of suit. Without limiting the
generality of the term, “damages” shall include loss of profits
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
By law
()
Date: February 22, 2013 08:59PM
You're not seeing the big picture here. You're allowing you hatred of lizzie to cloud your judgement. It isn't lizzie doing this but her family, the real victims. If you take a look at the other thread from March you will see she was able to meet with the poster she first suspected. Just because she was a headache here does not mean Cary will not provide her with the necessary information.
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
KF7wk
()
Date: February 22, 2013 08:59PM
By law Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> § 18.2-152.12. Civil relief; damages.
> A. Any person whose property or person is injured
> by reason of a violation of any provision of this
> article or by any act of
> computer trespass set forth in subdivisions A 1
> through A 8 of § 18.2-152.4 regardless of whether
> such act is committed
> with malicious intent may sue therefor and recover
> for any damages sustained and the costs of suit.
> Without limiting the
> generality of the term, “damages” shall
> include loss of profits
even more proof there is zero chance
it is funny to think that lizzie thought she could subpoena shit from ffu
-------------------------------------------------------
> § 18.2-152.12. Civil relief; damages.
> A. Any person whose property or person is injured
> by reason of a violation of any provision of this
> article or by any act of
> computer trespass set forth in subdivisions A 1
> through A 8 of § 18.2-152.4 regardless of whether
> such act is committed
> with malicious intent may sue therefor and recover
> for any damages sustained and the costs of suit.
> Without limiting the
> generality of the term, “damages” shall
> include loss of profits
even more proof there is zero chance
it is funny to think that lizzie thought she could subpoena shit from ffu
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
By law
()
Date: February 22, 2013 09:00PM
§ 18.2-152.5:1. Using a computer to gather identifying information; penalties.
A. It is unlawful for any person, other than a law-enforcement officer, as defined in § 9.1-101, and acting in the performance
of his official duties, to use a computer to obtain, access, or record, through the use of material artifice, trickery or
deception, any identifying information, as defined in clauses (iii) through (xiii) of subsection C of § 18.2-186.3. Any person
who violates this section is guilty of a Class 6 felony.
B. Any person who violates this section and sells or distributes such information to another is guilty of a Class 5 felony.
C. Any person who violates this section and uses such information in the commission of another crime is guilty of a Class 5
felony.
A. It is unlawful for any person, other than a law-enforcement officer, as defined in § 9.1-101, and acting in the performance
of his official duties, to use a computer to obtain, access, or record, through the use of material artifice, trickery or
deception, any identifying information, as defined in clauses (iii) through (xiii) of subsection C of § 18.2-186.3. Any person
who violates this section is guilty of a Class 6 felony.
B. Any person who violates this section and sells or distributes such information to another is guilty of a Class 5 felony.
C. Any person who violates this section and uses such information in the commission of another crime is guilty of a Class 5
felony.
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
6NWMx
()
Date: February 22, 2013 09:02PM
By law Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You're not seeing the big picture here. You're
> allowing you hatred of lizzie to cloud your
> judgement. It isn't lizzie doing this but her
> family, the real victims. If you take a look at
> the other thread from March you will see she was
> able to meet with the poster she first suspected.
> Just because she was a headache here does not mean
> Cary will not provide her with the necessary
> information.
never going to happen
there is no reason for Cary to do anything
and a person can only get an IP address, which equals nothing - that has been proven legally a hundred times over
-------------------------------------------------------
> You're not seeing the big picture here. You're
> allowing you hatred of lizzie to cloud your
> judgement. It isn't lizzie doing this but her
> family, the real victims. If you take a look at
> the other thread from March you will see she was
> able to meet with the poster she first suspected.
> Just because she was a headache here does not mean
> Cary will not provide her with the necessary
> information.
never going to happen
there is no reason for Cary to do anything
and a person can only get an IP address, which equals nothing - that has been proven legally a hundred times over
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
By law
()
Date: February 22, 2013 09:02PM
The fact that the crimes have moved from the computer and into the real world so to speak is what makes a difference here.
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
vuwNF
()
Date: February 22, 2013 09:03PM
By law Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> § 18.2-152.5:1. Using a computer to gather
> identifying information; penalties.
> A. It is unlawful for any person, other than a
> law-enforcement officer, as defined in § 9.1-101,
> and acting in the performance
> of his official duties, to use a computer to
> obtain, access, or record, through the use of
> material artifice, trickery or
> deception, any identifying information, as defined
> in clauses (iii) through (xiii) of subsection C of
> § 18.2-186.3. Any person
> who violates this section is guilty of a Class 6
> felony.
> B. Any person who violates this section and sells
> or distributes such information to another is
> guilty of a Class 5 felony.
> C. Any person who violates this section and uses
> such information in the commission of another
> crime is guilty of a Class 5
> felony.
so if lizzie ever outed anyone she would be guilty of a felony - ok
-------------------------------------------------------
> § 18.2-152.5:1. Using a computer to gather
> identifying information; penalties.
> A. It is unlawful for any person, other than a
> law-enforcement officer, as defined in § 9.1-101,
> and acting in the performance
> of his official duties, to use a computer to
> obtain, access, or record, through the use of
> material artifice, trickery or
> deception, any identifying information, as defined
> in clauses (iii) through (xiii) of subsection C of
> § 18.2-186.3. Any person
> who violates this section is guilty of a Class 6
> felony.
> B. Any person who violates this section and sells
> or distributes such information to another is
> guilty of a Class 5 felony.
> C. Any person who violates this section and uses
> such information in the commission of another
> crime is guilty of a Class 5
> felony.
so if lizzie ever outed anyone she would be guilty of a felony - ok
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
By law
()
Date: February 22, 2013 09:04PM
§ 18.2-152.5. Computer invasion of privacy; penalties.
A. A person is guilty of the crime of computer invasion of privacy when he uses a computer or computer network and
intentionally examines without authority any employment, salary, credit or any other financial or identifying information, as
defined in clauses (iii) through (xiii) of subsection C of § 18.2-186.3, relating to any other person. “Examination” under this
section requires the offender to review the information relating to any other person after the time at which the offender
knows or should know that he is without authority to view the information displayed.
B. The crime of computer invasion of privacy shall be punishable as a Class 1 misdemeanor.
C. Any person who violates this section after having been previously convicted of a violation of this section or any
substantially similar laws of any other state or of the United States is guilty of a Class 6 felony.
D. Any person who violates this section and sells or distributes such information to another is guilty of a Class 6 felony.
E. Any person who violates this section and uses such information in the commission of another crime is guilty of a Class 6
felony.
A. A person is guilty of the crime of computer invasion of privacy when he uses a computer or computer network and
intentionally examines without authority any employment, salary, credit or any other financial or identifying information, as
defined in clauses (iii) through (xiii) of subsection C of § 18.2-186.3, relating to any other person. “Examination” under this
section requires the offender to review the information relating to any other person after the time at which the offender
knows or should know that he is without authority to view the information displayed.
B. The crime of computer invasion of privacy shall be punishable as a Class 1 misdemeanor.
C. Any person who violates this section after having been previously convicted of a violation of this section or any
substantially similar laws of any other state or of the United States is guilty of a Class 6 felony.
D. Any person who violates this section and sells or distributes such information to another is guilty of a Class 6 felony.
E. Any person who violates this section and uses such information in the commission of another crime is guilty of a Class 6
felony.
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
By law
()
Date: February 22, 2013 09:06PM
I think this is what you're speaking on
The IP address and domain name do not directly identify the sender, but if the IP address or domain name is acquired from
a registering organization, a database search of the address or domain name can eventually lead to the contact information
on file with the registration organizations. A sender’s IP address or domain name which is not registered will not prevent
the transmission of the e-mail leading to information.
The IP address and domain name do not directly identify the sender, but if the IP address or domain name is acquired from
a registering organization, a database search of the address or domain name can eventually lead to the contact information
on file with the registration organizations. A sender’s IP address or domain name which is not registered will not prevent
the transmission of the e-mail leading to information.
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
ykdVP
()
Date: February 22, 2013 09:06PM
By law Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The fact that the crimes have moved from the
> computer and into the real world so to speak is
> what makes a difference here.
no it does not - that is reaching and impossible to prove who posted from any ip address
proven legally many times
postings here would be USELESS in any investigation
-------------------------------------------------------
> The fact that the crimes have moved from the
> computer and into the real world so to speak is
> what makes a difference here.
no it does not - that is reaching and impossible to prove who posted from any ip address
proven legally many times
postings here would be USELESS in any investigation
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
By law
()
Date: February 22, 2013 09:09PM
http://www.wjla.com/articles/2013/02/soraida-hicks-romance-turns-to-cyber-attack-stalking-and-harassment-84879.html
I'll just leave this here. I'm not sure why you're so hostile but have a good weekend.
I'll just leave this here. I'm not sure why you're so hostile but have a good weekend.
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
Cw3ew
()
Date: February 22, 2013 09:10PM
you can copypasta as many laws as you like, no way to prove anything from an ip address
and Cary would have to have the supreme court demand a posters information before he would budge
so zero chance for some children who pissed in each others yards
and Cary would have to have the supreme court demand a posters information before he would budge
so zero chance for some children who pissed in each others yards
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
By law
()
Date: February 22, 2013 09:22PM
"Hicks started working with Arlington Police, but since the attacks were from computers in Boston, it was hard for Arlington officers to get their hands on him.
"We were convinced she was physically in danger," said Arlington Police detective Angela Comer"
I'm only pasting to show that these things can and happen no matter how much you want to make believe they don't.
If someone from another state can get caught, I think someone another city away will be brought to the same justice. This stuff is not impossible. These people didn't have to go to such a high ranking court. Cary said he would comply, why argue about it?
"We were convinced she was physically in danger," said Arlington Police detective Angela Comer"
I'm only pasting to show that these things can and happen no matter how much you want to make believe they don't.
If someone from another state can get caught, I think someone another city away will be brought to the same justice. This stuff is not impossible. These people didn't have to go to such a high ranking court. Cary said he would comply, why argue about it?
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
MN7mP
()
Date: February 22, 2013 09:32PM
By law Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "Hicks started working with Arlington Police, but
> since the attacks were from computers in Boston,
> it was hard for Arlington officers to get their
> hands on him.
> "We were convinced she was physically in danger,"
> said Arlington Police detective Angela Comer"
>
>
> I'm only pasting to show that these things can and
> happen no matter how much you want to make believe
> they don't.
>
>
> If someone from another state can get caught, I
> think someone another city away will be brought to
> the same justice. This stuff is not impossible.
> These people didn't have to go to such a high
> ranking court. Cary said he would comply, why
> argue about it?
"physically in danger" - no one is
and Cary reads the board, he can see who the violent posters are = lizzie
Cary would not "comply" when the grades were released and on national news, why would he for something as trivial as this nonsense?
on top of that no one knows what happened - think a self professed liar is going to have any sway with Cary? - no
you could email another poster and tell them you were going to kill them, and nothing would happen
you must be new here
-------------------------------------------------------
> "Hicks started working with Arlington Police, but
> since the attacks were from computers in Boston,
> it was hard for Arlington officers to get their
> hands on him.
> "We were convinced she was physically in danger,"
> said Arlington Police detective Angela Comer"
>
>
> I'm only pasting to show that these things can and
> happen no matter how much you want to make believe
> they don't.
>
>
> If someone from another state can get caught, I
> think someone another city away will be brought to
> the same justice. This stuff is not impossible.
> These people didn't have to go to such a high
> ranking court. Cary said he would comply, why
> argue about it?
"physically in danger" - no one is
and Cary reads the board, he can see who the violent posters are = lizzie
Cary would not "comply" when the grades were released and on national news, why would he for something as trivial as this nonsense?
on top of that no one knows what happened - think a self professed liar is going to have any sway with Cary? - no
you could email another poster and tell them you were going to kill them, and nothing would happen
you must be new here
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
By law
()
Date: February 22, 2013 09:37PM
Cary didn't comply with the grades because no damages were done to the students, none of them filed charges on being harassed or stalked to my knowledge.
If someone from this website came to any poster's house that does raise the threat of physical danger.
You have a personal beef with lizzie so that's why you're having a hard time with this.
If someone from this website came to any poster's house that does raise the threat of physical danger.
You have a personal beef with lizzie so that's why you're having a hard time with this.
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
stupid kids
()
Date: February 22, 2013 09:42PM
cops weren't involved with the grades case..just lawyers..
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
By law
()
Date: February 22, 2013 09:45PM
Okay, that further explains what I was getting at with my previous posting. All I'm saying is this isn't about lizzie it's about her family, who are the real victims. No matter how violent she may appear on here I don't see anyone bringing charges against her for physical stalking. That is all.
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
stupid kids
()
Date: February 22, 2013 09:46PM
wasn't talking to you..
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
By law
()
Date: February 22, 2013 09:49PM
Okay. Well to the other poster, saying you are going to kill someone in cyber space isn't the same as someone physically going to someone's home. I hope I've made that part at least clear. I guess we will just have to see how this plays out. I was not posting for a debate. Just providing laws that to apply to Virginia cyber (stalking) laws.
Have a great weekend.
Have a great weekend.
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
K3XxN
()
Date: February 22, 2013 09:51PM
By law Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Okay, that further explains what I was getting at
> with my previous posting. All I'm saying is this
> isn't about lizzie it's about her family, who are
> the real victims. No matter how violent she may
> appear on here I don't see anyone bringing charges
> against her for physical stalking. That is all.
wtf does her family have to do with anything?
what lawyer isgoing to listen to "some annonymous person from y\the internet put a sign in my yard?"
real danger there
-------------------------------------------------------
> Okay, that further explains what I was getting at
> with my previous posting. All I'm saying is this
> isn't about lizzie it's about her family, who are
> the real victims. No matter how violent she may
> appear on here I don't see anyone bringing charges
> against her for physical stalking. That is all.
wtf does her family have to do with anything?
what lawyer isgoing to listen to "some annonymous person from y\the internet put a sign in my yard?"
real danger there
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
you have..
()
Date: February 22, 2013 09:54PM
K3XxN Wrote:
-----------------------------------------------
> wtf does her family have to do with anything?
>
> what lawyer isgoing to listen to "some annonymous
> person from y\the internet put a sign in my
> yard?"
>
> real danger there
..issues...
-----------------------------------------------
> wtf does her family have to do with anything?
>
> what lawyer isgoing to listen to "some annonymous
> person from y\the internet put a sign in my
> yard?"
>
> real danger there
..issues...
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
stupid kids
()
Date: February 22, 2013 09:56PM
the house = her family's
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
so much pent up rage
()
Date: February 22, 2013 09:58PM
you have.. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> K3XxN Wrote:
> -----------------------------------------------
> > wtf does her family have to do with anything?
> >
> > what lawyer isgoing to listen to "some
> annonymous
> > person from y\the internet put a sign in my
> > yard?"
> >
> > real danger there
>
> ..issues...
+1
-------------------------------------------------------
> K3XxN Wrote:
> -----------------------------------------------
> > wtf does her family have to do with anything?
> >
> > what lawyer isgoing to listen to "some
> annonymous
> > person from y\the internet put a sign in my
> > yard?"
> >
> > real danger there
>
> ..issues...
+1
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
emkPm
()
Date: February 22, 2013 10:00PM
can anyone tell me what frisky is accused of doing?
so far, putting a sign in someones yard
the police would laugh at you if you called them
so far, putting a sign in someones yard
the police would laugh at you if you called them
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
stupid kids
()
Date: February 22, 2013 10:02PM
angry kid is so flustered he can't even type straight anymore ..better hide your street sign before he gets you
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
h3HFk
()
Date: February 22, 2013 10:03PM
No one has been in lizzies yard, because she said she would shoot them dead.
remember, she is willing to kill someone for coming into her yard
hate to be someone trying to walk in that yard to sell some girlscout cookies
you people do realize that anyone can walk into your yard and get this! even knock on your door
remember, she is willing to kill someone for coming into her yard
hate to be someone trying to walk in that yard to sell some girlscout cookies
you people do realize that anyone can walk into your yard and get this! even knock on your door
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
so much pent up rage
()
Date: February 22, 2013 10:04PM
stupid kids Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> angry kid is so flustered he can't even type
> straight anymore ..better hide your street sign
> before he gets you
if he can step away from the computer long enough to do so
-------------------------------------------------------
> angry kid is so flustered he can't even type
> straight anymore ..better hide your street sign
> before he gets you
if he can step away from the computer long enough to do so
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
stupid kids
()
Date: February 22, 2013 10:05PM
emkPm Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> can anyone tell me what frisky is accused of
> doing?
>
> so far, putting a sign in someones yard
>
> the police would laugh at you if you called them
trespass and felony theft of government property is no laughing matter
-------------------------------------------------------
> can anyone tell me what frisky is accused of
> doing?
>
> so far, putting a sign in someones yard
>
> the police would laugh at you if you called them
trespass and felony theft of government property is no laughing matter
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
stupid kids
()
Date: February 22, 2013 10:07PM
he's going to be here all night defending himself
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
so much pent up rage
()
Date: February 22, 2013 10:08PM
im crying
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
GjFMu
()
Date: February 22, 2013 10:08PM
frisky will be posting here again, let him tell if there are is any truth to this bullshit
i agree, no police or lawyer are going to do anything about a couple of kids fighting on the internet
/thread
i agree, no police or lawyer are going to do anything about a couple of kids fighting on the internet
/thread
he did it
Posted by:
so much pent up rage
()
Date: February 22, 2013 10:09PM
stupid kids Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> he's going to be here all night defending himself
justifying his actions*
-------------------------------------------------------
> he's going to be here all night defending himself
justifying his actions*
he did it
Posted by:
stupid kids
()
Date: February 22, 2013 10:12PM
GjFMu Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> frisky will be posting here again, let him tell if
> there are is any truth to this bullshit
>
> i agree, no police or lawyer are going to do
> anything about a couple of kids fighting on the
> internet
>
> /thread
right..since he did of course disappear the same day this was first posted lol of course you agree, you posted that earlier. you are missing the entire point of these actions being taken the net
-------------------------------------------------------
> frisky will be posting here again, let him tell if
> there are is any truth to this bullshit
>
> i agree, no police or lawyer are going to do
> anything about a couple of kids fighting on the
> internet
>
> /thread
right..since he did of course disappear the same day this was first posted lol of course you agree, you posted that earlier. you are missing the entire point of these actions being taken the net
Re: he did it
Posted by:
frisked
()
Date: February 22, 2013 10:13PM
I think frisky mentioning the missing sign and the slang or whatever written on it speaks for his involvement
Re: he did it
Posted by:
stupid kids
()
Date: February 22, 2013 10:15PM
lol @ "are is" anonymous frisky is so flustered
Friskydingo will indeed probably be back posting, tomorrow. Like nothing happened. Right?
Friskydingo will indeed probably be back posting, tomorrow. Like nothing happened. Right?
Re: he did it
Posted by:
so much pent up rage
()
Date: February 22, 2013 10:16PM
frisked Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think frisky mentioning the missing sign and the
> slang or whatever written on it speaks for his
> involvement
+904848382826372
/thread
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think frisky mentioning the missing sign and the
> slang or whatever written on it speaks for his
> involvement
+904848382826372
/thread
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
misinformation
()
Date: February 22, 2013 10:33PM
h3HFk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No one has been in lizzies yard, because she said
> she would shoot them dead.
>
> remember, she is willing to kill someone for
> coming into her yard
>
> hate to be someone trying to walk in that yard to
> sell some girlscout cookies
>
> you people do realize that anyone can walk into
> your yard and get this! even knock on your door
Not when you have no trespassing signs up
-------------------------------------------------------
> No one has been in lizzies yard, because she said
> she would shoot them dead.
>
> remember, she is willing to kill someone for
> coming into her yard
>
> hate to be someone trying to walk in that yard to
> sell some girlscout cookies
>
> you people do realize that anyone can walk into
> your yard and get this! even knock on your door
Not when you have no trespassing signs up
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
Legg Mason
()
Date: February 22, 2013 11:03PM
Wow! LOL! This had 1 post and like 8 views when I left! I'll have to read this shit later! Haha so much for no one caring! Ha!
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
old newss
()
Date: February 23, 2013 12:56AM
it has been stated before that everyone's ip address can be seen on the forum. it is normally right next to every poster's names between the ( ) just like most other phorum forums. it is blank and that is why cary said it is hidden however if you input the script then you can see everyones ip address.
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
someone is getting worried
()
Date: February 23, 2013 01:23AM
That?
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
MALEVOLENT
()
Date: February 23, 2013 01:27AM
Stupid
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
stupid is as stupid does
()
Date: February 23, 2013 01:28AM
MALEVOLENT Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Stupid
the great Cary has spoken
-------------------------------------------------------
> Stupid
the great Cary has spoken
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
MALEVOLENT
()
Date: February 23, 2013 01:30AM
And while you were typing that up, I was spending time with my friends LOL!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFjwQm-1hQk&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Enjoy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFjwQm-1hQk&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Enjoy!
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
no you wasnt
()
Date: February 23, 2013 01:32AM
you have been on this site since 4:27 in the afternoon, loser
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
friskydingo too lazy to sign in
()
Date: February 23, 2013 01:33AM
no you wasnt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> you have been on this site since 4:27 in the
> afternoon, loser
+oak10... so true
-------------------------------------------------------
> you have been on this site since 4:27 in the
> afternoon, loser
+oak10... so true
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
MALEVOLENT
()
Date: February 23, 2013 01:35AM
no you wasnt Wrote:
----------------------------------------------------
> I have been on this site since 4:27 in the
> afternoon, I am a loser and love you, lizzie
Okay, watch this one too!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4UByzRNiKg&feature=youtube_gdata_player
I'm a cynical, sarcastic bitch offline too!
----------------------------------------------------
> I have been on this site since 4:27 in the
> afternoon, I am a loser and love you, lizzie
Okay, watch this one too!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4UByzRNiKg&feature=youtube_gdata_player
I'm a cynical, sarcastic bitch offline too!
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
didn't read lol
()
Date: February 23, 2013 01:37AM
didn't watch either.
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
MALEVOLENT
()
Date: February 23, 2013 01:40AM
Me at Target with my boyfriend! :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvLX3dd8Brk&feature=youtube_gdata_player
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvLX3dd8Brk&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
pics or didn't happen
()
Date: February 23, 2013 01:45AM
MALEVOLENT Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Me at Target with my boyfriend! :)
pics or gtfo
-------------------------------------------------------
> Me at Target with my boyfriend! :)
pics or gtfo
Re: CARY - can you confirm or deny the following?
Posted by:
MALEVOLENT
()
Date: February 23, 2013 01:51AM
Who the fuck takes pics at target!?