HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Off-Topic :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Pages: Previous12All
Current Page: 2 of 2
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: haveaniceday1 ()
Date: August 25, 2021 07:03PM

California Defamation (Libel and Slander) Laws
Updated May 3, 2021

Defamation in California – "When can I sue someone for it?"
To establish a defamation claim in California, you must prove four facts:

That someone made a false statement of purported “fact” about you:
That the statement was made (“published”) to a third party;
That the person who made the statement did so negligently, recklessly or intentionally; and,
That as a result of the statement, your reputation was damaged.
California law recognizes two types of defamation: libel and slander. The main difference is whether a defamatory statement was made verbally (constituting slander) or in writing (constituting libel).

In this article, our California personal injury attorneys will discuss the following:

1. The difference between defamation, libel and slander under California law
2. The elements of a California defamation case
2.1. Intentional publication of a statement of fact
2.2. False publications
2.3. Unprivileged publications
2.4. Injures or causes special damage
2.4.1. What is defamation “per se”?
2.4.2. What is defamation “per quod”?
2.5. Fault needed in California defamation cases
2.5.1. Who is a public figure under California defamation laws?
3. What about my right to free speech?
4. Defenses to defamation in California
5. What may a plaintiff recover in a California defamation case?
6. How long does a plaintiff have to file a defamation case?
7. Related cause of action – false light
Woman shocked by what she is reading on her smartphone.
Libel is a form of written defamation.

1. The difference between defamation, libel and slander under California law
Defamation is an invasion of the interest in reputation. Under California law, it’s a broad term for false statements made that cause damage to someone’s reputation.

California Civil Code (Cal. Civ. Code) states that defamation is effected by either libel or slander.1 If a statement is made verbally, it is slander. If made in writing, it is libel.

Cal. Civ. Code §45 and Cal. Civ. Code §46 provide codified definitions for both libel and slander. Cal. Civ. Code states:

Libel is a false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing, picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye, which exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or which causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which tends to injure him in his occupation.

In some states, libel can sometimes be charged as a crime and be punishable by a fine and jail time. However, in California, people who have been defamed are limited to their right to recover damages in a civil lawsuit.

According to Cal. Civ. Code §46, slander is “a false and unprivileged publication, orally uttered,” that does one or more of the following:

Charges any person with crime…;
Imputes in a person the existence of an infectious, contagious, or loathsome disease;
Tends directly to injure him in respect to his office, profession, trade or business…;
Imputes to a person impotence or a want of chastity; or
Which, by natural consequence, causes damage.2
Unlike libel, statutory rules for slander carve out certain types of oral comments that are deemed injurious.

Again, both libel and slander are different types of defamation.

2. The elements of a California defamation case
In California, a plaintiff must prove five elements to establish a defamation claim:

An intentional publication of a statement of fact;
That is false;
That is unprivileged;
That has a natural tendency to injure or which causes “special damage;” and,
The defendant’s fault in publishing the statement amounted to at least negligence.
2.1 Intentional publication of a statement of fact
Since California law treats defamation as an intentional tort, a defendant must have intended the specific publication.

A publication means communication to some third person who understands the defamatory meaning of the statement and its application to the person to whom reference is made.

A publication need not be to the public at large. A communication to a single person is sufficient.

With regards to statements of “fact,” a large issue arises in the context of whether a statement was either a statement of fact or a statement of opinion.

In general, if a defendant stated an opinion, as opposed to a fact, then there is no defamation.3

However, a statement of opinion may still constitute defamation if it implies the allegation of undisclosed defamatory facts as the basis for the opinion. The main determination is whether a reasonable person could conclude that the published statements imply a provably false factual assertion.4

The determination of whether a statement expresses fact or opinion is a question of law for the trial court, “unless the statement is susceptible of both an innocent and a libelous meaning, in which case the jury must decide how the statement was understood.5

2.2 False publications
In California defamation lawsuits, plaintiffs must present evidence that a statement of fact is provably false.

If the person who made the alleged defamatory statement was telling the truth, it is an absolute defense to an action for defamation.

For example, if a person is spreading a rumor about another person, and this rumor is true, there is no defamation

In cases involving matters of purely private concern, the burden of proving truth is on the defendant.

A defendant does not have to show the literal truth of every word in an alleged defamatory statement. It is sufficient if the defendant proves true the substance of the charge.

In cases involving public figures or matters of public concern, the burden is on the plaintiff to prove falsity.

2.3 Unprivileged publications
A statement must be unprivileged to be actionable as defamation. This is also to say that a showing of privileged communication is a defense to a defamation lawsuit.6

California courts have codified several privileged communications in Cal. Civ. Code § 47. According to this section, some examples of privileged publications include publications made:

In the proper discharge of an official duty:
In a legislative or judicial proceeding;
By a fair and true report in, or a communication to, a public journal of a judicial, legislative, or another public official proceeding; and,
A communication, without malice, to a person interested therein, (1) by one who is also interested, or (2) by one who stands in such a relation to the person interested as to afford a reasonable ground for supposing the motive for the communication to be innocent, or (3) who is requested by the person interested to give the information.
The last example is known as the common interest privilege and it is a conditional privilege because it only applies to “communication without malice.” The privilege is lost if the publication was actuated by malice. Once the defense has demonstrated that the qualified privilege applies, the plaintiff has the burden of defeating it by showing malice.7

2.4 Injures or causes special damage
The fourth element in a California defamation action requires a plaintiff to show that a publication caused injury or “special damages.” When it comes to this showing, California defamation cases fall into one of two categories. These include:

Defamation “per se”
Defamation “per quod”
2.4.1 What is defamation “per se”?
In some defamation cases, the publication, or defamatory statement in question, is considered so damaging that the plaintiff is entitled to sue without having to prove actual damages.

Such statements constitute defamation per se under California law. Per se is a Latin term meaning “of itself.” Depending on whether the statements are written or spoken, this could be referred to as slander per se or libel per se.

California law has a broad definition of “per se” defamation. It consists of anything that is damaging on its face without further explanation.

Most “per se” cases occur when someone falsely accuses another person of having committed a crime or being unfit to practice the person’s trade, business, or profession.

2.4.2 What is defamation “per quod”?
In California, if a defamation case is not categorized as “per se,” it is defamation “per quod.” Per quod is a Latin term meaning by which or whereby.

If a defamatory publication is “per quod,” it means that the publication is not defamatory on its face and requires allegations and proof of special damages.

Examples of special damages might include (but are not limited to):

Lost profits;
Decreased business traffic; and/or,
Adverse employment consequences.
Defamation per quod cases demand the use of extrinsic evidence or explanatory information to show the libel or slander.

2.5 Fault needed in California defamation cases
As with any personal injury in California, the defendant must have acted with a degree of legal culpability for the plaintiff to be entitled to damages. However, the level of culpability required in a California defamation case depends on whether the plaintiff is a public or private figure.

When the plaintiff is a private individual, he or she is only required to prove that the defendant was negligent in making a defamatory statement.

A public figure, however, must prove affirmatively that a statement was false. He or she must also prove “actual malice.” This means that the defendant made the defamatory statement either with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard for the truth.

2.5.1 Who is a public figure under California defamation laws?
In California, to classify a person as a public figure, the person must have achieved such pervasive fame or notoriety that he becomes a public figure for all purposes and in all contexts. Some examples of a public figure under California law include:

An author;
A television personality;
The founder of a church; and,
A real-estate developer.
California law also requires “limited-purpose” public figures to prove malice in defamation actions.

A limited-purpose public figure is considered different than a public figure.

A limited-purpose public figure is a person who voluntarily injects himself or is drawn into a particular public controversy.8

As examples, the following persons have been considered limited-purpose public figures under California defamation law:

The president of two corporations that opposed rezoning issues affecting his property; and,
A self-proclaimed expert in earthquake safety.
A copy of the United States Constitution under a gavel.
The United States Supreme Court has long held that there is “no constitutional value in false statements of fact.”

3. What about my right to free speech?
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of free speech. But, this right is not absolute.

The United States Supreme Court has long held that there is “no constitutional value in false statements of fact.”

4. Defenses to defamation in California
There are numerous defenses available in a California defamation case. Some have been touched on already. A few of the more common defenses include:

The defendant’s statement was true;
The statement wasn’t published;
The statement was privileged;
The statement was an opinion or fair comment on a matter of public interest;
The statement wasn’t made negligently or with malice; and/or,
The defendant never said anything negative about the plaintiff.
An experienced California defamation attorney can advise you on which, if any, defenses might apply to your defamation suit.

5. What may a plaintiff recover in a California defamation case?
If a plaintiff is successful in his or her defamation case, that party may recover damages.

In general, a plaintiff may be awarded three types of damages. These include:

General damages, which are damages for the plaintiff’s loss of reputation, shame, mortification, and hurt feelings;
Special damages, which are damages to the plaintiff’s property, trade, profession or occupation; or,
Punitive damages, which are damages awarded in the discretion of the superior court or the jury, to be recovered in addition to general and special damages, and to be awarded for the sake of example and by way of punishing a defendant.
The specific type(s) of damages a plaintiff may be awarded will most likely depend on the facts and circumstances of a given case.

6. How long does a plaintiff have to file a defamation case?
In California, a lawsuit for defamation must be commenced within one year.

The one-year period (the” limitations period” or “statute of limitations”) starts running when the plaintiff knows – or, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have known – about the defendant’s wrongful actions.

7. Related cause of action – false light
A false light claim in California creates a right to sue when someone knowingly or recklessly creates publicity about another person in a way that unreasonably places the other person in a false light.

In general, a plaintiff in a false light suit must prove the following elements:

The defendant published some information about the plaintiff;
The information portrayed the plaintiff in a false or misleading light;
The information was highly offensive or embarrassing to a reasonable person; and,
The defendant published the information with reckless disregard as to its offensiveness.
Public disclosure of private facts is a similar cause of action. A form of invasion of privacy, this tort occurs when one publically disseminates private or embarrassing facts about a person, without the person’s consent, and without a legitimate public concern for the topic.

While defamation is meant to protect a person from injury to his reputation, false light is meant to protect a person from the offense or embarrassment that arises from a misleading or untrue implication.

Group of law firm receptionists with headsets
Call our law firm for legal advice. We offer free consultations in Los Angeles and throughout the state of California.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: happydays ()
Date: August 25, 2021 09:51PM

Can a text app be traced?
Police say when it comes to crime, an app won't stop them from figuring out who you are. ... Many apps keep track of your info, including texts and pictures from the burn number. And that anonymous number can be traced back to you with a simple search warrant.
Attachments:
niceday.png

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: talent comparison ()
Date: August 25, 2021 10:31PM

Meade has more talent than this Corey or the other Corey Heim.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: save pingpong ()
Date: August 27, 2021 09:44PM

Revenge porn
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Revenge porn is the distribution of sexually explicit images or videos of individuals without their consent.[1] The material may have been made by a partner in an intimate relationship with the knowledge and consent of the subject at the time, or it may have been made without their knowledge. The subject may have experienced sexual violence during the recording of the material, in some cases facilitated by narcotics such as date rape drugs which also cause a reduced sense of pain and involvement in the sexual act, dissociative effects and amnesia. The possession of the material may be used by the perpetrators to blackmail the subjects into performing other sex acts, to coerce them into continuing a relationship or to punish them for ending one, to silence them, to damage their reputation, and/or for financial gain.

In the wake of civil lawsuits and the increasing numbers of reported incidents, legislation has been passed in a number of countries and jurisdictions to outlaw the practice, though approaches have varied. The practice has also been described as a form of psychological abuse and domestic violence, as well as a form of sexual abuse.[2]

The term "revenge porn" most commonly refers to the uploading of sexually explicit material to the Internet to humiliate and intimidate a subject who has broken off a relationship.[1] The term is also often misused to describe non 'revenge' scenarios, including nonconsensual pornography distributed by hackers or by individuals seeking profit or notoriety.[3][4] The images are usually accompanied by sufficient information to identify the pictured individual (a process known as doxing), typically names and locations, and can include risqué comments, links to social media profiles, home addresses and workplaces.[5][6] In some cases victims are exposed to workplace discrimination, cyber-stalking or physical attack. Some companies search the Internet for potential sources of bad publicity, resulting in many victims of revenge porn losing their jobs and finding themselves effectively unhirable.[7] Some academics argue that the term "revenge porn" should not be used, and instead that it should be referred to as "image-based sexual abuse."[8]

Jurisdictions which have passed laws against revenge porn include Italy, Israel, Germany, the United Kingdom, Canada,[9] 40/50 states of the United States—plus Washington, D.C.[10],the U.S. military[11][12][13] and U.S. territories including Puerto Rico and Guam.[14][15] Australia has also passed a law at the Commonwealth level that commenced on 1 September 2018.[16][17] The Australian states and territories of South Australia,[18][19] Victoria,[20] New South Wales,[21] the Australian Capital Territory,[22] the Northern Territory,[23] Queensland,[24] Western Australia,[25] and Tasmania,[26] have complementary state level laws that criminalize this behaviour. Furthermore, Australia also has a civil penalties

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: ringo chan-sav da children ()
Date: August 27, 2021 09:48PM

“Revenge Porn” is now a crime in the military.
Leave a Comment / Court Martial Appeals Blog, Military Law Blog
What if your ex-boyfriend posts a picture of you naked on Facebook without your permission? It is now a crime in the military. Article 117a, “Wrongful broadcast or distribution of intimate visual images” has been approved and now incorporated into the UCMJ. Article 117a states that:

Any person subject to this chapter who—
(1) knowingly and wrongfully broadcasts or distributes an intimate visual image of a private area of another person who—
(A) is at least 18 years of age at the time the intimate visual image was created;
(B) is identifiable from the image itself or from information displayed in connection with the image; and
(C) does not explicitly consent to the broadcast or distribution of the intimate visual image;
(2) knows or reasonably should have known that the intimate visual image was made under circumstances in which the person depicted in the intimate visual image retained a reasonable expectation of privacy regarding any broadcast or distribution of the intimate visual image; and
(3) knows or reasonably should have known that the broadcast or distribution of the intimate visual image is likely—
(A) to cause harm, harassment, intimidation, emotional distress, or financial loss for the person depicted in the intimate visual image; or
(B) to harm substantially the depicted person with respect to that person’s health, safety, business, calling, career, financial condition, reputation, or personal relationships, is guilty of wrongful distribution of intimate visual images and shall by punished as a court-martial may direct.

In more simple terms, this article makes it a crime to broadcast or distribute a picture of someone else’s private area if that person did not consent to it, or if that person has a good reason to believe it would be kept private, and if it could cause some type of harm. This article seems to address the exact scenario sometimes referred to as “revenge porn.” Now any military person taking revenge in that manner can be punished under the UCMJ. While this crime might have been punishable under Article 120c, it is now specifically delineated in Article 117a.

If you or a loved one is facing court-martial charges, you need an attorney who is apprised of all the newest decisions in military appellate law. I pride myself on keeping up with new decisions and using those decisions to help my clients. You also need an attorney with experience. A court-martial is one of the biggest events that could happen in your life or the life of your loved one. Make sure you have an attorney that you trust to do the job right. I have the experience you need if you are facing a court-martial or other adverse military action. To speak to an experienced court-martial and military defense attorney, call Bill Cassara at 706-445-2943 for a free consultation.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: Hootie the Hoot Owl ()
Date: August 27, 2021 11:56PM

Corey Feldman says that Charlie Sheen when he was age 19 buttraped Corey Haim when he was age 13. Don't sue me, I'm not saying it. I'm just saying that Corey Feldman says it. Its on Corey Haim's Wikipedia page.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: LOSINGURRANK ()
Date: August 28, 2021 12:40AM

Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: ringo chan-sav da children ()
Date: August 27, 2021 09:48PM

“Revenge Porn” is now a crime in the military.
Leave a Comment / Court Martial Appeals Blog, Military Law Blog
What if your ex-boyfriend posts a picture of you naked on Facebook without your permission? It is now a crime in the military. Article 117a, “Wrongful broadcast or distribution of intimate visual images” has been approved and now incorporated into the UCMJ. Article 117a states that:

Any person subject to this chapter who—
(1) knowingly and wrongfully broadcasts or distributes an intimate visual image of a private area of another person who—
(A) is at least 18 years of age at the time the intimate visual image was created;
(B) is identifiable from the image itself or from information displayed in connection with the image; and
(C) does not explicitly consent to the broadcast or distribution of the intimate visual image;
(2) knows or reasonably should have known that the intimate visual image was made under circumstances in which the person depicted in the intimate visual image retained a reasonable expectation of privacy regarding any broadcast or distribution of the intimate visual image; and
(3) knows or reasonably should have known that the broadcast or distribution of the intimate visual image is likely—
(A) to cause harm, harassment, intimidation, emotional distress, or financial loss for the person depicted in the intimate visual image; or
(B) to harm substantially the depicted person with respect to that person’s health, safety, business, calling, career, financial condition, reputation, or personal relationships, is guilty of wrongful distribution of intimate visual images and shall by punished as a court-martial may direct.

In more simple terms, this article makes it a crime to broadcast or distribute a picture of someone else’s private area if that person did not consent to it, or if that person has a good reason to believe it would be kept private, and if it could cause some type of harm. This article seems to address the exact scenario sometimes referred to as “revenge porn.” Now any military person taking revenge in that manner can be punished under the UCMJ. While this crime might have been punishable under Article 120c, it is now specifically delineated in Article 117a.

If you or a loved one is facing court-martial charges, you need an attorney who is apprised of all the newest decisions in military appellate law. I pride myself on keeping up with new decisions and using those decisions to help my clients. You also need an attorney with experience. A court-martial is one of the biggest events that could happen in your life or the life of your loved one. Make sure you have an attorney that you trust to do the job right. I have the experience you need if you are facing a court-martial or other adverse military action. To speak to an experienced court-martial and military defense attorney, call Bill Cassara at 706-445-2943 for a free consultation.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: Wendy Davis () ()
Date: September 13, 2021 05:40PM

Hear this out loud
A nurse could lose her ability to practice after it was found that she had a sexual relationship with a vulnerable mental health patient, which he confessed she had instigated - yeah sounds about right-

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: Wendy Davis ()
Date: September 13, 2021 05:43PM

Basically, you should report any nurse whose behavior is unsafe, incompetent, unethical, affected by the use of alcohol, drugs or other chemicals, or affected by a physical or mental condition. How do I file a complaint? Many states have complaint forms available on their website, or you may call NCSBN at 312.525.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: Wendy Davis ()
Date: September 13, 2021 05:55PM

marrrcoss????? Marrcosss? you there?-
we have a few questions to ask-
Attachments:
karafeeleyshootingblacktar.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: Wendy Davis ()
Date: September 13, 2021 06:06PM

Bridge Home Health & Hospice
Hospital & Health Care
San diego ca

THE BEST THEY HAVE!!!!
Attachments:
karafeeley4.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: save the kids ()
Date: September 13, 2021 06:14PM

Chan v. EEOC
Petitioner: RINGO CHAN
Respondent: EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Case Number: 20-1239
Filed: December 11, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 10, 2020 CHAN v. EEOC
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 12, 2020 Filing 24 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 23 ] filed by Respondent EEOC. The response brief is due 06/26/2020. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [693776] [JAL] [Entered: 05/12/2020 09:20 AM]
May 11, 2020 Filing 23 MOTION of Respondent EEOC to extend the time to 06/26/2020 to file the respondent brief. [Consent: unopposed]. Service: 05/11/2020 by email. [693603] [20-1239] [Domenique Kirchner] [Entered: 05/11/2020 03:41 PM]
April 20, 2020 Filing 22 REMINDER : All counsel of record are reminded of their responsibility per Fed. Cir. R. 47.4(a) to promptly submit an amended Certificate of Interest as information changes during the pendency of the appeal. Failure to comply with these Rules may delay the timely processing of your case or result in adverse action. [688191] [JAL] [Entered: 04/20/2020 10:52 AM]
April 17, 2020 Filing 21 MODIFIED ENTRY: OPENING BRIEF FILED for Petitioner Ringo Chan. Number of Pages: 48. Service: 04/17/2020 by email. Unless ordered otherwise, any responsive deadline runs from the date of service of this brief. See Fed. Cir. R. 31. [687999] --[Edited 04/20/2020 by JAL - Compliance review complete] [Adam Carter] [Entered: 04/17/2020 04:21 PM]
April 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER filed granting motion [ # 17 ] to the extent that the record on appeal is supplemented to include the written hearing transcript. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [686919] [LMS] [Entered: 04/14/2020 04:21 PM]
April 8, 2020 Filing 19 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 18 ] filed by Petitioner Ringo Chan. The opening brief is due 04/17/2020. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [685206] [LMN] [Entered: 04/08/2020 11:54 AM]
April 7, 2020 Filing 18 MOTION of Petitioner Ringo Chan to extend the time to 04/17/2020 to file the Appellant's Opening Brief. [Consent: unopposed]. Service: 04/07/2020 by email. [685019] [20-1239] [Adam Carter] [Entered: 04/07/2020 07:34 PM]
March 23, 2020 Filing 17 MOTION of Petitioner Ringo Chan and Respondent EEOC Supplement the Certified List [Consent: unopposed]. Service: 03/23/2020 by email. [680822] [20-1239] [Domenique Kirchner] [Entered: 03/23/2020 10:21 AM]
February 12, 2020 Filing 16 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE: re: motion to extend time to file brief Docket No. [ # 13 ], ERROR: Petitioner's motion contained incorrect party designations in its caption and did not contain a certificate of compliance with the word/line count requirement. CORRECTION: For future motions, pursuant to FCR 27(a)(2) and FRAP 32(g), please ensure that the caption matches the official caption for this appeal and a certificate of compliance is included. THIS MESSAGE IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. [670577] [JAL] [Entered: 02/12/2020 09:39 AM]
February 12, 2020 Filing 15 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 13 ] filed by Petitioner Ringo Chan. The opening brief is due 04/10/2020. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [670575] [JAL] [Entered: 02/12/2020 09:37 AM]
February 11, 2020 Filing 14 REMINDER : All counsel of record are reminded of their responsibility per Fed. Cir. R. 47.4(a) and Fed. Cir. R. 47.3 to promptly submit an amended Certificate of Interest (COI) and/or Entry of Appearance (EOA) as information changes during the pendency of the appeal. Failure to comply with these Rules may delay the timely processing of your case or result in adverse action. [670466] [JAL] [Entered: 02/11/2020 05:49 PM]
February 7, 2020 Filing 13 MOTION of Petitioner Ringo Chan to extend the time to 04/10/2020 to file the Appellant's Opening Brief - February 28, 2020. [Consent: unopposed]. Service: 02/07/2020 by email. [669454] [20-1239] [Adam Carter] [Entered: 02/07/2020 02:56 PM]
January 10, 2020 Filing 12 Docketing Statement for the Petitioner Ringo Chan. Service: 01/10/2020 by email. [662341] [20-1239] [Robert Oswald] [Entered: 01/10/2020 05:13 PM]
January 10, 2020 Filing 11 Docketing Statement for the Respondent EEOC. Service: 01/10/2010 by email. [662204] [20-1239] [Domenique Kirchner] [Entered: 01/10/2020 12:57 PM]
December 30, 2019 Filing 10 Corrected Certificate of Interest for Petitioner Ringo Chan. Service: 12/30/2019 by email. [659590] [20-1239] [Adam Carter] [Entered: 12/30/2019 05:06 PM]
December 30, 2019 Filing 9 Certified list received. Service: 12/23/2019 by US mail. Refer to Fed. Cir. R. 31 for calculating brief deadlines from service of the certified list. [659576] [JAL] [Entered: 12/30/2019 04:35 PM]
December 30, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Petitioner Ringo Chan, Certificate of Interest [ # 2 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 01/07/2020. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [659561] [JAL] [Entered: 12/30/2019 04:18 PM]
December 30, 2019 Filing 7 Entry of appearance for Domenique Kirchner as principal counsel for Respondent EEOC. Service: 12/30/2019 by email. [659511] [20-1239] [Domenique Kirchner] [Entered: 12/30/2019 03:11 PM]
December 24, 2019 Filing 6 Statement Concerning Discrimination pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) for Petitioner Ringo Chan. Service: 12/24/2019 by clerk, US mail. [658717] [20-1239] [Adam Carter] [Entered: 12/24/2019 12:05 PM]
December 24, 2019 Filing 5 USERRA Notification Form for Petitioner Ringo Chan. Service: 12/24/2019 by clerk, US mail. [658716] [20-1239] [Adam Carter] [Entered: 12/24/2019 12:04 PM]
December 24, 2019 Filing 4 Entry of appearance for R. Scott Oswald as of counsel for Petitioner Ringo Chan. Service: 12/24/2019 by clerk, US mail. [658715] [20-1239] [Adam Carter] [Entered: 12/24/2019 12:04 PM]
December 24, 2019 Filing 3 Entry of appearance for Adam Augustine Carter as principal counsel for Petitioner Ringo Chan. Service: 12/24/2019 by clerk, fax. [658714] [20-1239] [Adam Carter] [Entered: 12/24/2019 12:03 PM]
December 24, 2019 Filing 2 Certificate of Interest for Petitioner Ringo Chan. Service: 12/24/2019 by clerk, US mail. [658713] [20-1239] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 8 ] [Adam Carter] [Entered: 12/24/2019 11:59 AM]
December 11, 2019 Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 12/10/2019. [655567] 15(c) is due on 12/26/2019. Entry of Appearance is due 12/26/2019. Certificate of Interest is due on 12/26/2019. Docketing Statement is due 01/10/2020. Certified List is due on 01/21/2020. [JAL] [Entered: 12/11/2019 10:27 AM]
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Chan v. EEOC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Represented By: Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice
Represented By: Domenique Grace Kirchner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: RINGO CHAN
Represented By: Adam Augustine Carter
Represented By: Robert Scott Oswald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: ringo chan-sav da children ()
Date: September 13, 2021 06:18PM

Complaints of fraud, waste and abuse in the Department of Defense or any military service can be reported separately through a hotline that has been set up. Complaints can be called in Monday through Friday, 8am to 4pm EST, at 1-800-424-9098. You can also email your complaint.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: good to know ()
Date: September 13, 2021 06:20PM

I think I know her from eeoc (san diego)- you are correct!!!!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: Hootie the thread bumping Hoot ()
Date: September 13, 2021 09:30PM

Hootie the Hoot Owl Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Corey Feldman says that Charlie Sheen when he was
> age 19 buttraped Corey Haim when he was age 13.
> Don't sue me, I'm not saying it. I'm just saying
> that Corey Feldman says it. Its on Corey Haim's
> Wikipedia page.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: Hootie the thread bumping Hoot ( ()
Date: September 13, 2021 10:39PM

IS SHE SHOOTING HEROIN- WHO IS SHE?


Bridge Home Health & Hospice
Hospital & Health Care
San diego ca
Attachments:
karafeeleyshootingblacktar.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: Bridge Home Health & Hospice ()
Date: September 14, 2021 11:18PM

Anyone who has a loved one in this place - Do your research as to who is taking care of your loved ones,
Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties - Fairfax Undergroundhttp://www.fairfaxunderground.com › forum › read
Dec 15, 2012 · 100 posts · 3 authors
This number belongs to KARA m FEELEY from San Diego CA. WACKO METH/HEROIN/FENT/BLACK TAR ANYTHING YOU CAN SHOOT IN YOUR ARMS
https://www.healthgrades.com/media/english/pdf/sanctions/HGPY004972FD89235873305242013.pdf
Attachments:
karafeeleyshootingblacktar1.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: Bridge Home Health & Hospice () ()
Date: September 15, 2021 07:05PM

PLease contact a lawyer __ she is the devil
Attachments:
karafeeleyshootingblacktar1.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: Go Away . ()
Date: September 15, 2021 07:11PM

Bridge Home Health & Hospice () Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> PLease contact a lawyer __ she is the devil


You keep posting your shit on here, it is obviously important to you. Why don't you start a thread called Bridge Home Health & Hospice and get the fuck off the thread about Corey Feldman's christmas parties and the other Corey getting boned in his butt.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: Go Away/kara feeley ()
Date: September 15, 2021 09:11PM

Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: Bridge Home Health & Hospice ()
Date: September 14, 2021 11:18PM

Anyone who has a loved one in this place - Do your research as to who is taking care of your loved ones,
Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties - Fairfax Undergroundhttp://www.fairfaxunderground.com › forum › read
Dec 15, 2012 · 100 posts · 3 authors
This number belongs to KARA m FEELEY from San Diego CA. WACKO METH/HEROIN/FENT/BLACK TAR ANYTHING YOU CAN SHOOT IN YOUR ARMS
https://www.healthgrades.com/media/english/pdf/sanctions/HGPY004972FD89235873305242013.pdf
Attachments:
karafeeleyshootingblacktar1.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: Go Away/kara feeley () ()
Date: September 15, 2021 09:17PM

Bridge Home Health & Hospice
san diego ca ca

the best!!!! DRUGGIES
Attachments:
karafeeleyshootingblacktar1.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: Bridge Home Health & Hospice ()
Date: September 15, 2021 09:18PM

Go Away/kara feeley Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
> Posted by: Bridge Home Health & Hospice ()
> Date: September 14, 2021 11:18PM
>
> Anyone who has a loved one in this place - Do your
> research as to who is taking care of your loved
> ones,
> Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties - Fairfax
> Undergroundhttp://www.fairfaxunderground.com
> forum › read
> Dec 15, 2012 · 100 posts · 3 authors
> This number belongs to KARA m FEELEY from San
> Diego CA. WACKO METH/HEROIN/FENT/BLACK TAR
> ANYTHING YOU CAN SHOOT IN YOUR ARMS
> https://www.healthgrades.com/media/english/pdf/san
> ctions/HGPY004972FD89235873305242013.pdf
> Attachments:
> karafeeleyshootingblacktar1.jpg



Because you are either too lazy or too stupid or both, I started a thread called Bridge Home Health & Hospice. Now, scurry over and post all your bullshit about the nurse you hate over there.

You're welcome.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: WEDY ()
Date: September 15, 2021 09:31PM

Hi- im nicole _ karas daughter who wants nothing to do with her- she is crazy - having sex for drugs - has 5 family members that dont talk to her_ she had sex with her ogbyn for drugs - i know his name and he had a family at the time- i never want to see her again

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: Bridge Home Health & Hospice () ()
Date: September 15, 2021 09:35PM

STOP THE DRUGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Attachments:
karafeeleyshootingblacktar.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: Bridge Home Health & Hospice () ()
Date: September 15, 2021 09:35PM

STOP THE DRUGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Attachments:
karafeeleyshootingblacktar.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: Bridge Home Health & Hospice () ()
Date: September 15, 2021 09:35PM

STOP THE DRUGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Attachments:
karafeeleyshootingblacktar.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: Bridge Home Health & Hospice ()
Date: September 15, 2021 10:04PM

Bridge Home Health & Hospice () Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> STOP THE DRUGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


You are one annoying bitch. I hope that nurse you hate so much airs you out with fentanyl.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: Bridge Home Health & Hospice ()
Date: September 16, 2021 01:42AM

IS SHE SHOOTING HEROIN- WHO IS SHE?


Bridge Home Health & Hospice
Hospital & Health Care
San diego ca

Hear this out loud
A nurse could lose her ability to practice after it was found that she had a sexual relationship with a vulnerable mental health patient, which he confessed she had instigated - yeah sounds about right-

https://www.healthgrades.com/media/english/pdf/sanctions/HGPY004972FD89235873305242013.pdf
Attachments:
karafeeleyshootingblacktar1.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: ridge Home Health & Hospice ()
Date: September 16, 2021 02:28AM

CUZ YOUR MOM LIKES IT

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: Bridge Home Health & Hospice () ()
Date: September 16, 2021 06:06PM

Interesting YOU bring up the fent _ know one else did but you - wanna see a pic of the script/ wanna see a kara passed out naked cuz she has no reaason to live cuz she lost your daughter?

I have so many pictures_ defame me? call me a child chomo? you are a sick person -
I dont care anymore- I tried to let it go _ BUT I didnt get jobs or loans_ SO i KNOW LONGER CARE - ALL OF YOUR PICS DONE!!!!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: COURT TIME ()
Date: September 16, 2021 06:12PM

MAKE NO MISTAKE WE ARE GOING TO COURT - MT LAWYERS ARE GETTING THE CASE _ FINALLY HAVE THE MONEY TO RECK YOU__

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: COURT TIME ()
Date: September 16, 2021 06:32PM

KARA M FEELEY / KARA SEEELY/ KARA FEELEY
I HOPE YOU HAVE NOT SPENT ALL YOUR MONEY ON DRUGS - CUZ YOUR NO LONGER A NURSE-
SO SAD _ YOUR UGLY LIZARD NECK - BLAH
Attachments:
photolibrary_rm_photo_of_woman_with_two_cold_sores.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: GO AWAY1 ()
Date: September 16, 2021 06:34PM

YES YOU RIGHT ____SORRY___GROSS HERP 1 AND 2
Attachments:
karafeeley (3).jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: GO AWAY3 ()
Date: September 17, 2021 08:49PM

HELLO "GOAWAY" I SEE YOU WANT TO BE APART OF THE CONVERSATION-LOL
i TRIED TO HELP kARA FEELEY EVEN WHEN HER OWN MOTHER/FAMILY WOULD NOT - I helped her buy a car - bought her food - drove her to and from work_ THEN SHE TOOK A PICTURE OF ME ON FACBOOK COPY AND PASTED IT TO MAKE IT SEEM LIKE A REAL NEWS STORY- MY LEGAL TEAM IS ALL OVER THIS- sHE KNOWS WHAT SHE DID was wrong _ she defamed and slandered me in the most SICK way_ so she is gonna pay_ court wise- compensation _ LOSS OF JOB ETC.... SO YOU WANNA GET IN THE WAY OF SOMETHING I NEVER STARTED TEXT ME - WHATS YOUR #? Dont hide like a little girl behind the internet= by the way I already have your location_
cheers
Attachments:
karafeeleyshootingblacktar2.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: goaway9 ()
Date: September 18, 2021 03:07PM

"You are one annoying bitch. I hope that nurse you hate so much airs you out with fentanl""

Fentanl? Really? wow you are the first person to mention Fentanl_ Why would you say that drug? Cuz you know Kara has been addicted to it for years - You ever see someone going through Fent withdrawal so bad that she actually slammed her own hand in a car door just to go to the ER to get pain meds? Ever drive someone to a 24 hour pharmacy on a friday night and sit with someone going thru withdrawal til the clock hits 1201 the next day so her script could be filled early? - Ever let someone move into your place bc they had know where to live? Only to have her steal all of your other roommates clothes and then sell them for money? Ever have someone have you arrested calling in a domestic call - only to have the police mail you a letter(2days later) saying they were sorry for the arrest? (I have the letter) - Ever pay for someones storage unit so she wouldnt lose her stuff? So why has she paid lots of money to ruin me? bc I was done - done with her and kicked her out of my place - she did the same to scott greer who kicked her outta his house when they were engaged - I cared to much and I learned!! You cant change people- At one point I would have done anything for kara - but now I know better_

Question to GO AWAY - How did you know she was a nurse? interesting -

End of story - google contacted me to take down your disgusting crop picture job - however thier is a GOOD reason its still up_
GO AWAY - CONTACT ME ANYTIME-
KARA - STOP HAVING SCOTT GREER OR ANYONE ELSE CALL MY NUMBER - '
LAST BUT NOT LEAST - I WAS A BITCH WHEN I CARED FOR YOU KARA - BUT NOW CANT WAIT TO SEE YOU IN COURT - SEE HOW MUCH OF A BITCH I AM NOW -
Attachments:
karafeeleyshootingblacktardone.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: Candice Clark ()
Date: September 19, 2021 06:13PM


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: i was wrong sorry ()
Date: September 19, 2021 06:15PM

Candice Clark Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> https://www.healthgrades.com/media/english/pdf/san
> ctions/HGPY004972FD89235873305242013.pdf

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: That nurse you hate ()
Date: September 19, 2021 06:27PM

I love having to skip past all your bullshit in a thread about Corey Feldman's christmas parties. You are the coolest, and not an annoying bitch at all!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: That nurse you hate1 ()
Date: September 19, 2021 08:53PM

GREAT THEN SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!
Attachments:
karamfeeley.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Corey Feldman hosting Christmas parties
Posted by: CHEERS ()
Date: September 19, 2021 08:59PM


Options: ReplyQuote
Pages: Previous12All
Current Page: 2 of 2


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **    **  **         **     **  **     **   ******  
 ***   **  **    **   **     **  **     **  **    ** 
 ****  **  **    **   **     **  **     **  **       
 ** ** **  **    **   **     **  *********  **       
 **  ****  *********  **     **  **     **  **       
 **   ***        **   **     **  **     **  **    ** 
 **    **        **    *******   **     **   ******  
This forum powered by Phorum.