Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
DoJ needed six months to find no support for voter ID suits.
Posted by:
G2
()
Date: November 29, 2012 04:46PM
More Holder lies. Time for him to resign.
http://washingtonexaminer.com/doj-needed-six-months-to-find-no-support-for-voter-id-suits/article/2514012#.ULfW6eTBFF8
http://washingtonexaminer.com/doj-needed-six-months-to-find-no-support-for-voter-id-suits/article/2514012#.ULfW6eTBFF8
Re: DoJ needed six months to find no support for voter ID suits.
Posted by:
lie with a smile
()
Date: November 29, 2012 05:29PM
He should have been gone after fast and furious. Smoke screens stalling diversionary problems. If you or I tried to pull that on Congress our ass would be locked up. Maybe Mr Obama can invoke executive privilage to help his buddy once again to come up with another alibi
Re: DoJ needed six months to find no support for voter ID suits.
Posted by:
HLJA
()
Date: November 29, 2012 07:52PM
Where's Mittens?
Re: DoJ needed six months to find no support for voter ID suits.
Posted by:
JohnGalt338
()
Date: November 30, 2012 05:23PM
How many voters don't have sufficient ID to vote in there congressional district? Probably few to none.
How many voters don't have sufficient ID to vote in some congressional district where they are not entitled to vote?
Probably quite a few who like to skew voting results.
Voter ID rules make sense, are logical and are unrelated to any type of unlawful discrimination -- unless discriminating against unlawful voters is wrong.
I have never once questioned having to show ID for myself - guess they were picking on white guys again.
How many voters don't have sufficient ID to vote in some congressional district where they are not entitled to vote?
Probably quite a few who like to skew voting results.
Voter ID rules make sense, are logical and are unrelated to any type of unlawful discrimination -- unless discriminating against unlawful voters is wrong.
I have never once questioned having to show ID for myself - guess they were picking on white guys again.
Re: DoJ needed six months to find no support for voter ID suits.
Posted by:
Leftist Gorilla
()
Date: November 30, 2012 05:39PM
JohnGalt338 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How many voters don't have sufficient ID to vote
> in there congressional district? Probably few to
> none.
>
> How many voters don't have sufficient ID to vote
> in some congressional district where they are not
> entitled to vote?
> Probably quite a few who like to skew voting
> results.
>
> Voter ID rules make sense, are logical and are
> unrelated to any type of unlawful discrimination
> -- unless discriminating against unlawful voters
> is wrong.
>
> I have never once questioned having to show ID for
> myself - guess they were picking on white guys
> again.
I'd just like to see the ID checks done unilaterally. You wanna' vote...you gotta' show ID. It doesn't matter if you're a nappy headed thug or a fat, balding white guy.
-------------------------------------------------------
> How many voters don't have sufficient ID to vote
> in there congressional district? Probably few to
> none.
>
> How many voters don't have sufficient ID to vote
> in some congressional district where they are not
> entitled to vote?
> Probably quite a few who like to skew voting
> results.
>
> Voter ID rules make sense, are logical and are
> unrelated to any type of unlawful discrimination
> -- unless discriminating against unlawful voters
> is wrong.
>
> I have never once questioned having to show ID for
> myself - guess they were picking on white guys
> again.
I'd just like to see the ID checks done unilaterally. You wanna' vote...you gotta' show ID. It doesn't matter if you're a nappy headed thug or a fat, balding white guy.
Re: DoJ needed six months to find no support for voter ID suits.
Posted by:
SoylentGreen
()
Date: November 30, 2012 06:00PM
Leftist Gorilla Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'd just like to see the ID checks done
> unilaterally. You wanna' vote...you gotta' show
> ID. It doesn't matter if you're a nappy headed
> thug or a fat, balding white guy.
Too bad you don't live in Virginia.
Because that's exactly what was required in order to participate in the last election. A voter ID card or a drivers license.
Lots of Arabs, East Indies, Asian, Hispanics, blacks and whites in line.
All had one or the other or were told to leave.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'd just like to see the ID checks done
> unilaterally. You wanna' vote...you gotta' show
> ID. It doesn't matter if you're a nappy headed
> thug or a fat, balding white guy.
Too bad you don't live in Virginia.
Because that's exactly what was required in order to participate in the last election. A voter ID card or a drivers license.
Lots of Arabs, East Indies, Asian, Hispanics, blacks and whites in line.
All had one or the other or were told to leave.
Re: DoJ needed six months to find no support for voter ID suits.
Posted by:
Young Curmudgeon
()
Date: November 30, 2012 08:31PM
I see nothing wrong with requiring a photo ID in order to vote. If you don't have the ability to prove who you are with a valid driver's license, passport, gun license, college ID, or something else, you shouldn't be able to vote.
Re: DoJ needed six months to find no support for voter ID suits.
Posted by:
trogdor!
()
Date: November 30, 2012 10:21PM
FOIA is so regularly shit upon by government. Why even pretend there's any openness in government?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/30/2012 10:21PM by trogdor!.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/30/2012 10:21PM by trogdor!.