Time to put a stop to this madness. Impeach Obama now!

http://www.nagr.org/UN_lp_survey2.aspx?pid=key07&gclid=CPuZnp601rMCFQ-f4AodDCAAaQ

The UN takeover is underway! Run for your stupid lives!

Republicans are willing to raise taxes if it is to train sheriff's deputies to prepare for UN takeover. Makes a lot of fucking sense.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4bDWu3530U

HIST Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> >
> Impeach Obama now!

Right on bro, time to vote this thug-in-chief out of office before or whole country turns into George Orwell. Just this morning President Obama knocked on my door asking to borrow a cup of sugar, and as soon as I turned my back there he was running down the street with all my guns, escaping in a black helicopter.

Guns should not be in the hands of civilians.

Anyone who thinks gun ownership is appropriate must have the brain capacity of a slug.

Just look at the facts.

Guns are predominantly owned by people from the lower socio-economic classes - blue collar whites and blacks from the inner city.

These are our poorest educated citizens and the ones most likely to engage in criminal activity.

Republicans should join us Democrats in our worthy crusade to rid the globe of these killing machines.

GunsRnot4Peace Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Guns should not be in the hands of civilians.
>
> Anyone who thinks gun ownership is appropriate
> must have the brain capacity of a slug.
>
> Just look at the facts.
>
> Guns are predominantly owned by people from the
> lower socio-economic classes - blue collar whites
> and blacks from the inner city.
>
> These are our poorest educated citizens and the
> ones most likely to engage in criminal activity.
>
> Republicans should join us Democrats in our worthy
> crusade to rid the globe of these killing
> machines.

That's stupid.

Fruppie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> GunsRnot4Peace Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Guns should not be in the hands of civilians.
> >
> > Anyone who thinks gun ownership is appropriate
> > must have the brain capacity of a slug.
> >
> > Just look at the facts.
> >
> > Guns are predominantly owned by people from the
> > lower socio-economic classes - blue collar
> whites
> > and blacks from the inner city.
> >
> > These are our poorest educated citizens and the
> > ones most likely to engage in criminal
> activity.
> >
> > Republicans should join us Democrats in our
> worthy
> > crusade to rid the globe of these killing
> > machines.
>
> That's stupid.

Take your gun and stick it up your white trash racist ass.

GunsKill Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fruppie Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > GunsRnot4Peace Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Guns should not be in the hands of civilians.
> > >
> > > Anyone who thinks gun ownership is
> appropriate
> > > must have the brain capacity of a slug.
> > >
> > > Just look at the facts.
> > >
> > > Guns are predominantly owned by people from
> the
> > > lower socio-economic classes - blue collar
> > whites
> > > and blacks from the inner city.
> > >
> > > These are our poorest educated citizens and
> the
> > > ones most likely to engage in criminal
> > activity.
> > >
> > > Republicans should join us Democrats in our
> > worthy
> > > crusade to rid the globe of these killing
> > > machines.
> >
> > That's stupid.
>
> Take your gun and stick it up your white trash
> racist ass.

That's stupid.

GunsKill Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fruppie Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > GunsRnot4Peace Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Guns should not be in the hands of civilians.
> > >
> > > Anyone who thinks gun ownership is
> appropriate
> > > must have the brain capacity of a slug.
> > >
> > > Just look at the facts.
> > >
> > > Guns are predominantly owned by people from
> the
> > > lower socio-economic classes - blue collar
> > whites
> > > and blacks from the inner city.
> > >
> > > These are our poorest educated citizens and
> the
> > > ones most likely to engage in criminal
> > activity.
> > >
> > > Republicans should join us Democrats in our
> > worthy
> > > crusade to rid the globe of these killing
> > > machines.
> >
> > That's stupid.
>
> Take your gun and stick it up your white trash
> racist ass.

This is the same person who started the thread. Evidently when your argument is full of shit you have to pretend to be the counter point at an equivalent amount of full of shitness. No one under the obama or UN is trying to take away guns from Americans.

Just grow the fuck up and learn how to carry a cogent argument and stopped pulling this BS Clint Eastwood talking to an imaginary friend in a chair faux debate bullshit.

Obviously someone here has some homework to do. The SCOTUS ruling
in DC vv Heller determined the Individuals right to own a firearm.
Tough shit for the liberals. :)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller

GunsRnot4Peace Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Guns should not be in the hands of civilians.
>
> Anyone who thinks gun ownership is appropriate
> must have the brain capacity of a slug.
>
> Just look at the facts.
>
> Guns are predominantly owned by people from the
> lower socio-economic classes - blue collar whites
> and blacks from the inner city.
>
> These are our poorest educated citizens and the
> ones most likely to engage in criminal activity.
>
> Republicans should join us Democrats in our worthy
> crusade to rid the globe of these killing
> machines.


None of your facts actual facts.

If guns kill people do spoons make people fat?

grow the fuck up Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> GunsKill Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Fruppie Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > GunsRnot4Peace Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Guns should not be in the hands of
> civilians.
> > > >
> > > > Anyone who thinks gun ownership is
> > appropriate
> > > > must have the brain capacity of a slug.
> > > >
> > > > Just look at the facts.
> > > >
> > > > Guns are predominantly owned by people from
> > the
> > > > lower socio-economic classes - blue collar
> > > whites
> > > > and blacks from the inner city.
> > > >
> > > > These are our poorest educated citizens and
> > the
> > > > ones most likely to engage in criminal
> > > activity.
> > > >
> > > > Republicans should join us Democrats in our
> > > worthy
> > > > crusade to rid the globe of these killing
> > > > machines.
> > >
> > > That's stupid.
> >
> > Take your gun and stick it up your white trash
> > racist ass.
>
> This is the same person who started the thread.
> Evidently when your argument is full of shit you
> have to pretend to be the counter point at an
> equivalent amount of full of shitness. No one
> under the obama or UN is trying to take away guns
> from Americans.
>
> Just grow the fuck up and learn how to carry a
> cogent argument and stopped pulling this BS Clint
> Eastwood talking to an imaginary friend in a chair
> faux debate bullshit.


I am not the person who started this thread so stop making up shit that fits your idiotic pro-gun agenda.

Guns ARE predominately owned by those of the lower socio-economic class. These people ARE NOT the brightest nor the best educated amongst us.

If you think guns should be in the hands of blue collar white racists then you are part of the problem.

Republicans like you are so afraid of crime, you sleep with your rifles under your bed sheets.

Wake up and smell the coffee.

WE ARE GOING TO TAKE AWAY YOUR GUNS, FOR YOU OWN GOOD AND THE GOOD OF THE COUNTRY.

If you can't own a gun in NYC, why should you own one in Fairfax, VA????????

GunsBeBanned Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> grow the fuck up Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > GunsKill Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Fruppie Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > GunsRnot4Peace Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Guns should not be in the hands of
> > civilians.
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyone who thinks gun ownership is
> > > appropriate
> > > > > must have the brain capacity of a slug.
> > > > >
> > > > > Just look at the facts.
> > > > >
> > > > > Guns are predominantly owned by people
> from
> > > the
> > > > > lower socio-economic classes - blue
> collar
> > > > whites
> > > > > and blacks from the inner city.
> > > > >
> > > > > These are our poorest educated citizens
> and
> > > the
> > > > > ones most likely to engage in criminal
> > > > activity.
> > > > >
> > > > > Republicans should join us Democrats in
> our
> > > > worthy
> > > > > crusade to rid the globe of these killing
> > > > > machines.
> > > >
> > > > That's stupid.
> > >
> > > Take your gun and stick it up your white
> trash
> > > racist ass.
> >
> > This is the same person who started the thread.
> > Evidently when your argument is full of shit
> you
> > have to pretend to be the counter point at an
> > equivalent amount of full of shitness. No one
> > under the obama or UN is trying to take away
> guns
> > from Americans.
> >
> > Just grow the fuck up and learn how to carry a
> > cogent argument and stopped pulling this BS
> Clint
> > Eastwood talking to an imaginary friend in a
> chair
> > faux debate bullshit.
>
>
> I am not the person who started this thread so
> stop making up shit that fits your idiotic pro-gun
> agenda.
>
> Guns ARE predominately owned by those of the lower
> socio-economic class. These people ARE NOT the
> brightest nor the best educated amongst us.
>
> If you think guns should be in the hands of blue
> collar white racists then you are part of the
> problem.
>
> Republicans like you are so afraid of crime, you
> sleep with your rifles under your bed sheets.
>
> Wake up and smell the coffee.
>
> WE ARE GOING TO TAKE AWAY YOUR GUNS, FOR YOU OWN
> GOOD AND THE GOOD OF THE COUNTRY.
>
> If you can't own a gun in NYC, why should you own
> one in Fairfax, VA????????

Fuck off.

The UN has no power in the US, we have the Second Amendment. And if Obama tries to work his way around it, both parties better impeach him.

You have a fundamental right to own a gun, like it or not. 99% of gun owners keep them in a safe, responsible way. If you're a moron, and decide to leave it out so your kid can get it, you don't deserve a gun. This is basic sense, people. The answer to the problem is not "take everyone's guns away" or "repeal the Second Amendment", it's enforcing the current laws.

Young Curmudgeon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You have a fundamental right to own a gun, like it
> or not. 99% of gun owners keep them in a safe,
> responsible way. If you're a moron, and decide to
> leave it out so your kid can get it, you don't
> deserve a gun. This is basic sense, people. The
> answer to the problem is not "take everyone's guns
> away" or "repeal the Second Amendment", it's
> enforcing the current laws.


If you're a moron and decide to leave your gun out so your kid can get it, this is a good thing.

This is known as a Darwin filter. It stops that gene combination from continuing to mix with the rest of the gene pool.

GunsBeBanned Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If you can't own a gun in NYC, why should you own
> one in Fairfax, VA????????


Did Fairfax, VA suddenly fall under the rule of NYC?

GunsBeBanned Wrote:

> Guns ARE predominately owned by those of the lower
> socio-economic class. These people ARE NOT the
> brightest nor the best educated amongst us.

So? If they manage guns safely (which 99.9% do), they can keep them. Education level and intellect have nothing to do with it. Ever hear of Baruch Goldstein?

> If you think guns should be in the hands of blue
> collar white racists then you are part of the
> problem.

No, I'm not part of the problem, I'm proposing that current laws be enforced, which is different from "TAKE EVERYONE'S GUNS AWAY!". You are part of the problem, because you're lumping everyone into one category, which simply isn't true.

> Republicans like you are so afraid of crime, you
> sleep with your rifles under your bed sheets.

Try again. Most guns are not owned for crime prevention, though that's definitely a valid reason to own one.

> Wake up and smell the coffee.

Yes, you're an idiot, good job recognizing it.

> WE ARE GOING TO TAKE AWAY YOUR GUNS, FOR YOU OWN
> GOOD AND THE GOOD OF THE COUNTRY.

Second Amendment, you can try, but you have to get 38/50 states to agree to it. If Obama tries to do it himself, it's cause for impeachment... and I'm speaking as a Democrat. The solution is enforcing current laws, not making new ones nor taking people's guns away.

> If you can't own a gun in NYC, why should you own
> one in Fairfax, VA????????

The reason you can't own a gun in NYC is because nobody has bothered to challenge the law yet. If someone has, he hasn't brought it to the federal level yet.

Case in point, you can try to take people's guns away, but it's illegal. I don't care what Obama, Biden, or any other person in the Obama Adminstration wants. It's a right protected by the Bill of Rights, and in 223 years, the Bill of Rights hasn't been changed. You can try, but you'll fail.

Almost got it right Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Young Curmudgeon Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You have a fundamental right to own a gun, like
> it
> > or not. 99% of gun owners keep them in a safe,
> > responsible way. If you're a moron, and decide
> to
> > leave it out so your kid can get it, you don't
> > deserve a gun. This is basic sense, people. The
> > answer to the problem is not "take everyone's
> guns
> > away" or "repeal the Second Amendment", it's
> > enforcing the current laws.
>
>
> If you're a moron and decide to leave your gun out
> so your kid can get it, this is a good thing.
>
> This is known as a Darwin filter. It stops that
> gene combination from continuing to mix with the
> rest of the gene pool.

Yes, and no. It gets MSNBC and CNN talking about "THE EVILS OF GUNS" and then you have the knee-jerk reaction that this country is infamous for.

SoylentGreen Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> GunsBeBanned Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > If you can't own a gun in NYC, why should you
> own
> > one in Fairfax, VA????????
>
>
> Did Fairfax, VA suddenly fall under the rule of
> NYC?

No, the poster is ignorant; therefore, he has to bring in straw men.

Young Curmudgeon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> if Obama tries to work his way
> around it, both parties better impeach him.

Oh, he will and he should. And the democrats will fully support him, except for a few old curmudgeons whose days are numbered, anyway.

> 99% of gun owners keep them in a safe,
> responsible way.

Tell that to the 47,856 people who were murdered in the U.S. by firearms, between 2006 and 2007, that according to the FBI Uniform Crime Report.

> If you're a moron, and decide to
> leave it out so your kid can get it, you don't
> deserve a gun.

So, according to you, we wait until the kid is dead, before we take away the gun?

That makes a lot of sense.

You republicans are no longer going to win on this issue. We democrats are in power and we WILL civilize you, even if we have to remove your guns, by force.

Stop the Paultards.

They want to legalize drugs, open the borders, grant amnesty to illegal immigrants and continue to blame America for the global islamic jihad.

Republicans&Guns Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Young Curmudgeon Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > if Obama tries to work his way
> > around it, both parties better impeach him.
>
> Oh, he will and he should. And the democrats will
> fully support him, except for a few old
> curmudgeons whose days are numbered, anyway.
>
> > 99% of gun owners keep them in a safe,
> > responsible way.
>
> Tell that to the 47,856 people who were murdered
> in the U.S. by firearms, between 2006 and 2007,
> that according to the FBI Uniform Crime Report.
>
> > If you're a moron, and decide to
> > leave it out so your kid can get it, you don't
> > deserve a gun.
>
> So, according to you, we wait until the kid is
> dead, before we take away the gun?
>
> That makes a lot of sense.
>
> You republicans are no longer going to win on this
> issue. We democrats are in power and we WILL
> civilize you, even if we have to remove your guns,
> by force.


Ummm... Gun ownership has increased greatly in recent years with the largest percentage growth coming among women (and to a lesser extent minorities) and initial purchasers. As has public opinion supporting ownership and that crosses party lines. As well as the recent Supreme Court decisions further supporting ownership. You've not only lost the legal battle re the issue, you've also lost the battle for hearts and minds.

Republicans&Guns Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Oh, he will and he should. And the democrats will
> fully support him, except for a few old
> curmudgeons whose days are numbered, anyway.

He shouldn't, and it's cause for impeachment. The Constitution is not a plaything of the Congress. We seem to have forgotten that. Executive orders are violations, regardless of who issues them.

>
> Tell that to the 47,856 people who were murdered
> in the U.S. by firearms, between 2006 and 2007,
> that according to the FBI Uniform Crime Report.

Your numbers don't add up. http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm
There weren't that many MURDERS in the US in those two years combined.

> So, according to you, we wait until the kid is
> dead, before we take away the gun?

No, ideally the kid never got to the gun. This is part of owning a firearm SAFELY and RESPONSIBLY. This means keeping it in a safe, with the ammunition in a separate area... you know, following the law.

> You republicans are no longer going to win on this
> issue. We democrats are in power and we WILL
> civilize you, even if we have to remove your guns,
> by force.

Too bad the Supreme Court will tell you it's illegal, and too bad the Bill of Rights forbids it. And it's too bad that there's waning public support for it: http://www.pollingreport.com/guns.htm


Hey, idiot, I'm a Democrat too. It'll interest you to know that the first thing authoritarian regimes do is disarm people. If you want to take people's guns away, you can try. It won't succeed.

GunsRnot4Peace Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Guns should not be in the hands of civilians.
>
> Anyone who thinks gun ownership is appropriate
> must have the brain capacity of a slug.
>
> Just look at the facts.
>
> Guns are predominantly owned by people from the
> lower socio-economic classes - blue collar whites
> and blacks from the inner city.
>
> These are our poorest educated citizens and the
> ones most likely to engage in criminal activity.
>
> Republicans should join us Democrats in our worthy
> crusade to rid the globe of these killing
> machines.

Nice try troll! I'm democrat, military, and have zero issues with gun ownership. As for you comment regarding blue collar whites and blacks from inner cities. What scares you more? That or some paranoid multi millionaire with an assault rifle who doesn't even know how to shoot? Oh and FYI Democrats DO own guns too you know!

Republicans&Guns Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Tell that to the 47,856 people who were murdered
> in the U.S. by firearms, between 2006 and 2007,
> that according to the FBI Uniform Crime Report.
>

40,000 people are killed in automobile accidents every year. Let's get rid of those, too.

Some people tend to forget that Harry Reid has an "A" rating from the
NRA. There are plenty of other pro-gun Democrats in the Senate and the
House who wouldn't be there if they were hostile towards the 2nd Amendment.
After 9/11 public opinion towards firearms ownership surged in favor
of gun ownership and continues to climb.

Ban the automobile? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> 40,000 people are killed in automobile accidents
> every year. Let's get rid of those, too.


this is always the retarded response

vehicles are a daily necessity to the majority of america

guns are not

therefore the two are not comparable

dumbfuck

applesoranges Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ban the automobile? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > 40,000 people are killed in automobile
> accidents
> > every year. Let's get rid of those, too.
>
>
> this is always the retarded response
>
> vehicles are a daily necessity to the majority of
> america
>
> guns are not
>
> therefore the two are not comparable
>
> dumbfuck


It isn't the automobile and its utility, but when you make an argument that we should ban guns because X thousand people are killed by guns, then it becomes a point of comparison. It is merely a way to provide perspective.

Heart disease kills quite a number of people, as well. More than guns ever will.

You mad, bro? numbnut.

You are the dumbfuck Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> applesoranges Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Ban the automobile? Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > > 40,000 people are killed in automobile
> > accidents
> > > every year. Let's get rid of those, too.
> >
> >
> > this is always the retarded response
> >
> > vehicles are a daily necessity to the majority
> of
> > america
> >
> > guns are not
> >
> > therefore the two are not comparable
> >
> > dumbfuck
>
>
> It isn't the automobile and its utility, but when
> you make an argument that we should ban guns
> because X thousand people are killed by guns, then
> it becomes a point of comparison. It is merely a
> way to provide perspective.
>
> Heart disease kills quite a number of people, as
> well. More than guns ever will.
>
> You mad, bro? numbnut.

you are wrong and even proved my point with the heart disease comment - thanks.

guns are made for one purpose, and that purpose is not comparable to the purpose of transportation

i know you do not have he mental ability to understand this, therefore i will let you live in your bubble of ignorance

done with you

Terp Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Some people tend to forget that Harry Reid has an
> "A" rating from the
> NRA. There are plenty of other pro-gun Democrats
> in the Senate and the
> House who wouldn't be there if they were hostile
> towards the 2nd Amendment.
> After 9/11 public opinion towards firearms
> ownership surged in favor
> of gun ownership and continues to climb.


Nice try.

Harry Reid is a senile old Mormon.

When it comes to ridding the nation of guns, believe me, we will dump the likes of that old coot faster than a whore turns a trick on a Friday night in Harlem.

Enjoy your guns while you have them you dumb ass republicans, because your gun days are numbered.

The dark ages are over; get used to it or get the fuck out of this country.

Find an island where barbarians are welcome.

tnFUJ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> you are wrong and even proved my point with the
> heart disease comment - thanks.
>
> guns are made for one purpose, and that purpose is
> not comparable to the purpose of transportation
>
> i know you do not have he mental ability to
> understand this, therefore i will let you live in
> your bubble of ignorance
>
> done with you

You obviously have no grasp about what the fuck you're even talking about, but that's okay.

Guns and automobiles are incomparable as objects when you talk about their purpose. Good, you got that far.

But when you argue that they kill a certain number of people, then it has nothing to do with their purpose, but the relativity of how many people they kill.

In your idiotic mind, the only thing we can compare guns against is other things that you believe "are designed to kill people"??? You are fucking stupid.

Good lord, your lack of any depth-of-knowledge and inability to grasp a concept is almost laughable.

BanGuns Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Terp Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Some people tend to forget that Harry Reid has
> an
> > "A" rating from the
> > NRA. There are plenty of other pro-gun
> Democrats
> > in the Senate and the
> > House who wouldn't be there if they were
> hostile
> > towards the 2nd Amendment.
> > After 9/11 public opinion towards firearms
> > ownership surged in favor
> > of gun ownership and continues to climb.
>
>
> Nice try.
>
> Harry Reid is a senile old Mormon.
>
> When it comes to ridding the nation of guns,
> believe me, we will dump the likes of that old
> coot faster than a whore turns a trick on a Friday
> night in Harlem.
>
> Enjoy your guns while you have them you dumb ass
> republicans, because your gun days are numbered.
>
> The dark ages are over; get used to it or get the
> fuck out of this country.
>
> Find an island where barbarians are welcome.


You're losing. 2 bad 4 u.



-


-


-


-


lulzes

applesoranges Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ban the automobile? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > 40,000 people are killed in automobile
> accidents
> > every year. Let's get rid of those, too.
>
>
> this is always the retarded response
>
> vehicles are a daily necessity to the majority of
> america
>
> guns are not
>
> therefore the two are not comparable
>
> dumbfuck
Attachments:

BanGuns Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Terp Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Some people tend to forget that Harry Reid has
> an
> > "A" rating from the
> > NRA. There are plenty of other pro-gun
> Democrats
> > in the Senate and the
> > House who wouldn't be there if they were
> hostile
> > towards the 2nd Amendment.
> > After 9/11 public opinion towards firearms
> > ownership surged in favor
> > of gun ownership and continues to climb.
>
>
> Nice try.
>
> Harry Reid is a senile old Mormon.
>
> When it comes to ridding the nation of guns,
> believe me, we will dump the likes of that old
> coot faster than a whore turns a trick on a Friday
> night in Harlem.
>
> Enjoy your guns while you have them you dumb ass
> republicans, because your gun days are numbered.
>
> The dark ages are over; get used to it or get the
> fuck out of this country.
>
> Find an island where barbarians are welcome.


Democrats have guns too... sorry. Public opinion is against you too. Hm... I guess when your positions have been shown to be wrong, the best thing is to attack people.

2Bad4You Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> lulzes


You can throw up all the stupid charts you want.

60% of Americans didn't want Obamacare and we got that through.

Just you wait and see what we have planned for your sorry republican ass.

Anyone with a brain knows guns should not be in the hands of the civilians.

StrictGunControlComing Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 2Bad4You Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > lulzes
>
>
> You can throw up all the stupid charts you want.
>
> 60% of Americans didn't want Obamacare and we got
> that through.
>
> Just you wait and see what we have planned for
> your sorry republican ass.
>
> Anyone with a brain knows guns should not be in
> the hands of the civilians.

StrictGunControlComing Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 2Bad4You Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > lulzes
>
>
> You can throw up all the stupid charts you want.
>
> 60% of Americans didn't want Obamacare and we got
> that through.
>
> Just you wait and see what we have planned for
> your sorry republican ass.


Uh huh, 'stupid charts' based on independent data which directly undercuts your entire premise.

Who's 'we?' You and the other dumbshits on Dem Underground who think that they're going to change the world? lmao


>
> Anyone with a brain knows guns should not be in
> the hands of the civilians.


So then you'd be fine with a Dick Cheney and cops like Bull Connor in control of all of the guns right?

Twat.

Young Curmudgeon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> BanGuns Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Terp Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Some people tend to forget that Harry Reid
> has
> > an
> > > "A" rating from the
> > > NRA. There are plenty of other pro-gun
> > Democrats
> > > in the Senate and the
> > > House who wouldn't be there if they were
> > hostile
> > > towards the 2nd Amendment.
> > > After 9/11 public opinion towards firearms
> > > ownership surged in favor
> > > of gun ownership and continues to climb.
> >
> >
> > Nice try.
> >
> > Harry Reid is a senile old Mormon.
> >
> > When it comes to ridding the nation of guns,
> > believe me, we will dump the likes of that old
> > coot faster than a whore turns a trick on a
> Friday
> > night in Harlem.
> >
> > Enjoy your guns while you have them you dumb
> ass
> > republicans, because your gun days are
> numbered.
> >
> > The dark ages are over; get used to it or get
> the
> > fuck out of this country.
> >
> > Find an island where barbarians are welcome.
>
>
> Democrats have guns too... sorry. Public opinion
> is against you too. Hm... I guess when your
> positions have been shown to be wrong, the best
> thing is to attack people.


Democrats have guns? What, like 3 of them? LMFAO.

Sorry, you conservative shoot em up republican dipshit, but gun owners are either white racist republicans like you or criminals.

You hide in your corner with your gun as your pacifier and when an african american puts one foot on that weed infested mess you call your front lawn, you shoot like the nervous coward you are.

Go out in your swamp and play with your guns, cowboy. Enjoy it while you can, but this country has spoken.

The democrats are in charge.

OutlawGuns Wrote:
> Sorry, you conservative shoot em up republican
> dipshit, but gun owners are either white racist
> republicans like you or criminals.
>
> You hide in your corner with your gun as your
> pacifier and when an african american puts one
> foot on that weed infested mess you call your
> front lawn, you shoot like the nervous coward you
> are.
>
> Go out in your swamp and play with your guns,
> cowboy. Enjoy it while you can, but this country
> has spoken.
>
> The democrats are in charge.

You're fucking illiterate. I've just said "I AM A DEMOCRAT, IDIOT!" The country has spoken... and you're on the wrong side.

You want to know the truth? Sometimes I just beg for the day that the country falls apart and people like you can't spout your justifications and other assorted bullshit. When you need gun owners to save your sorry ass. And with the way our economy is looking, it's going to happen. The US has been inching closer to economic disaster since Nixon took us of fthe gold standard.

I am not a racist; in fact, I support blacks probably a hell of a lot more than you do.

You're an idiot, and a troll. Shut the fuck up and do us all a favor.

StrictGunControlComing Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 2Bad4You Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > lulzes
>
>
> You can throw up all the stupid charts you want.
>
> 60% of Americans didn't want Obamacare and we got
> that through.
>
> Just you wait and see what we have planned for
> your sorry republican ass.
>
> Anyone with a brain knows guns should not be in
> the hands of the civilians.

Bill of Rights isn't going to be changed. 60% of Americans didn't want Obamacare because Obamacare doesn't sufficiently address the issues. I supported it and I have no idea how the hell we're going to pay for it.

YOU are what's wrong with the Democratic Party. YOU are the reason 2010 happened. I'm a DEMOCRAT (something you can't figure out) and I know these things to be true.

Here's the truth: you're wrong, and the majority of Americans know you're wrong. You can oppose guns all you want, it's your right. You don't have the ability to take them.

Young Curmudgeon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> OutlawGuns Wrote:
> > Sorry, you conservative shoot em up republican
> > dipshit, but gun owners are either white racist
> > republicans like you or criminals.
> >
> > You hide in your corner with your gun as your
> > pacifier and when an african american puts one
> > foot on that weed infested mess you call your
> > front lawn, you shoot like the nervous coward
> you
> > are.
> >
> > Go out in your swamp and play with your guns,
> > cowboy. Enjoy it while you can, but this
> country
> > has spoken.
> >
> > The democrats are in charge.
>
> You're fucking illiterate. I've just said "I AM A
> DEMOCRAT, IDIOT!" The country has spoken... and
> you're on the wrong side.
>
> You want to know the truth? Sometimes I just beg
> for the day that the country falls apart and
> people like you can't spout your justifications
> and other assorted bullshit. When you need gun
> owners to save your sorry ass. And with the way
> our economy is looking, it's going to happen. The
> US has been inching closer to economic disaster
> since Nixon took us of fthe gold standard.
>
> I am not a racist; in fact, I support blacks
> probably a hell of a lot more than you do.
>
> You're an idiot, and a troll. Shut the fuck up and
> do us all a favor.


The democratic party supports strict gun control, so you shut the fuck up, you goddamn hypocrite.

Young Curmudgeon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> YOU are what's wrong with the Democratic Party.
> YOU are the reason 2010 happened. I'm a DEMOCRAT
> (something you can't figure out) and I know these
> things to be true.
>
> Here's the truth: you're wrong, and the majority
> of Americans know you're wrong. You can oppose
> guns all you want, it's your right. You don't have
> the ability to take them.


He's not a democrat. He's a hyperventilating nitwit who just finished listening to Rush Limbaugh or Alex Jones podcasts and is freaking out about the impending takeover of america.

Just give him some space so he can catch his breath. He'll calm down soon enough. Probably won't even remember any of this. His synapses are just misfiring because of the emotional overload of all the fear and rage those AM radio losers perpetuate.

Young Curmudgeon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> OutlawGuns Wrote:
> > Sorry, you conservative shoot em up republican
> > dipshit, but gun owners are either white racist
> > republicans like you or criminals.
> >
> > You hide in your corner with your gun as your
> > pacifier and when an african american puts one
> > foot on that weed infested mess you call your
> > front lawn, you shoot like the nervous coward
> you
> > are.
> >
> > Go out in your swamp and play with your guns,
> > cowboy. Enjoy it while you can, but this
> country
> > has spoken.
> >
> > The democrats are in charge.
>
> You're fucking illiterate. I've just said "I AM A
> DEMOCRAT, IDIOT!" The country has spoken... and
> you're on the wrong side.
>
> You want to know the truth? Sometimes I just beg
> for the day that the country falls apart and
> people like you can't spout your justifications
> and other assorted bullshit. When you need gun
> owners to save your sorry ass. And with the way
> our economy is looking, it's going to happen. The
> US has been inching closer to economic disaster
> since Nixon took us of fthe gold standard.
>
> I am not a racist; in fact, I support blacks
> probably a hell of a lot more than you do.
>
> You're an idiot, and a troll. Shut the fuck up and
> do us all a favor.


U gots trolled dude.

Nobody is this dumb.

Young Curmudgeon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Second Amendment, you can try, but you have to get
> 38/50 states to agree to it. If Obama tries to do
> it himself, it's cause for impeachment... and I'm
> speaking as a Democrat. The solution is enforcing
> current laws, not making new ones nor taking
> people's guns away.


Itd be worse than that IF on the off chance they somehow managed to actually outlaw them and they tried to take them away it would be a civil war immediately and thats 100 percent assured not to mention states just flat out leaving the union

done with thinking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> tnFUJ Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > you are wrong and even proved my point with the
> > heart disease comment - thanks.
> >
> > guns are made for one purpose, and that purpose
> is
> > not comparable to the purpose of transportation
> >
> > i know you do not have he mental ability to
> > understand this, therefore i will let you live
> in
> > your bubble of ignorance
> >
> > done with you
>
> You obviously have no grasp about what the fuck
> you're even talking about, but that's okay.
>
> Guns and automobiles are incomparable as objects
> when you talk about their purpose. Good, you got
> that far.
>
> But when you argue that they kill a certain number
> of people, then it has nothing to do with their
> purpose, but the relativity of how many people
> they kill.
>
> In your idiotic mind, the only thing we can
> compare guns against is other things that you
> believe "are designed to kill people"??? You are
> fucking stupid.
>
> Good lord, your lack of any depth-of-knowledge and
> inability to grasp a concept is almost laughable.

They were talking about how worthless it is to compare the deaths you moron.

Young Curmudgeon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Bill of Rights isn't going to be changed.

It's all in the interpretation, and as a democrat you should know this.

The second amendment states that guns should be in the hands of the militia, not in the shaking hands of a barely literate alcoholic loser living in a trailer park.

> 60% of
> Americans didn't want Obamacare because Obamacare
> doesn't sufficiently address the issues. I
> supported it and I have no idea how the hell we're
> going to pay for it.

Glad you supported it, but what the fuck are you talking about? We are going to pay for it by raising taxes and rationing care, which will create a system based on fairness and social justice.

If you hadn't been so busy playing pat-a-cake with your republican macho-man neighbor, who's probably a pedophile, you would have know this.

> YOU are what's wrong with the Democratic Party.
> YOU are the reason 2010 happened. I'm a DEMOCRAT
> (something you can't figure out) and I know these
> things to be true.

> Here's the truth: you're wrong, and the majority
> of Americans know you're wrong. You can oppose
> guns all you want, it's your right. You don't have
> the ability to take them.

You aren't a democrat; you're just a troll, trying to make democrats look stupid.

BanGuns Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Young Curmudgeon Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Bill of Rights isn't going to be changed.
>
> It's all in the interpretation, and as a democrat
> you should know this.
>
> The second amendment states that guns should be in
> the hands of the militia, not in the shaking hands
> of a barely literate alcoholic loser living in a
> trailer park.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Notice the commas, what part of the right of the people to bear arms is hard to understand.



Thats all im contributing to you weasel, get a life and hopefully you really dont want to start a civil war like youre advocating

BanGuns Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Young Curmudgeon Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Bill of Rights isn't going to be changed.
>
> It's all in the interpretation, and as a democrat
> you should know this.
>
> The second amendment states that guns should be in
> the hands of the militia, not in the shaking hands
> of a barely literate alcoholic loser living in a
> trailer park.
>

Wrong. You lost that battle already. Read DC vs Heller. Done deal. You need to update your rote talking points.

itd be far worse Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the
> security of a free State, the right of the people
> to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
>
> Notice the commas, what part of the right of the
> people to bear arms is hard to understand.

Typical stupid republican.

The commas break up the sentence so those of us with working brains aren't subjected to a run-on sentence. Didn't they mention run-on sentences in the red-neck schools you southern hicks farted in?

The right of the people to bear arms is referring to the necessity of a well regulated militia, not to the rights of an individual, you inbred slack jawed racist.

BanGuns Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Typical stupid republican.
>
> The commas break up the sentence so those of us
> with working brains aren't subjected to a run-on
> sentence. Didn't they mention run-on sentences in
> the red-neck schools you southern hicks farted
> in?
>
> The right of the people to bear arms is referring
> to the necessity of a well regulated militia, not
> to the rights of an individual, you inbred slack
> jawed racist.


If you read the entire clause, it says that a well regulated militia is necessary for security, and therefore the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.


The well regulated militia is the government's militia, the Army. The soldiers do not keep and bear arms. They are issued their weapons. They have to give them back when they are billeted. The people have a right to keep and bear arms, because the government should not have a monopoly on force.

read the whole clause Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> BanGuns Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > Typical stupid republican.
> >
> > The commas break up the sentence so those of us
> > with working brains aren't subjected to a
> run-on
> > sentence. Didn't they mention run-on sentences
> in
> > the red-neck schools you southern hicks farted
> > in?
> >
> > The right of the people to bear arms is
> referring
> > to the necessity of a well regulated militia,
> not
> > to the rights of an individual, you inbred
> slack
> > jawed racist.
>
>
> If you read the entire clause, it says that a well
> regulated militia is necessary for security, and
> therefore the right of the people to keep and bear
> arms shall not be infringed.
>
>
> The well regulated militia is the government's
> militia, the Army. The soldiers do not keep and
> bear arms. They are issued their weapons. They
> have to give them back when they are billeted.
> The people have a right to keep and bear arms,
> because the government should not have a monopoly
> on force.


That's one interpretation.... the republican one.

Go away, you're an antique.

GunsKill Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> That's one interpretation.... the republican one.
>
> Go away, you're an antique.
Attachments:

GunsKill Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> That's one interpretation.... the republican one.
>
> Go away, you're an antique.


Well, here's the Supreme Court's interpretation:

Held:

1. The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Pp. 2–53.

(a) The Amendment’s prefatory clause announces a purpose, but does not limit or expand the scope of the second part, the operative clause. The operative clause’s text and history demonstrate that it connotes an individual right to keep and bear arms. Pp. 2–22.

(b) The prefatory clause comports with the Court’s interpretation of the operative clause. The “militia” comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. The Antifederalists feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in order to disable this citizens’ militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms, so that the ideal of a citizens’ militia would be preserved. Pp. 22–28.

(c) The Court’s interpretation is confirmed by analogous arms-bearing rights in state constitutions that preceded and immediately followed the Second Amendment . Pp. 28–30.

(d) The Second Amendment ’s drafting history, while of dubious interpretive worth, reveals three state Second Amendment proposals that unequivocally referred to an individual right to bear arms. Pp. 30–32.

(e) Interpretation of the Second Amendment by scholars, courts and legislators, from immediately after its ratification through the late 19th century also supports the Court’s conclusion. Pp. 32–47.

(f) None of the Court’s precedents forecloses the Court’s interpretation. Neither United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542 , nor Presser v. Illinois, 116 U. S. 252 , refutes the individual-rights interpretation. United States v. Miller, 307 U. S. 174 , does not limit the right to keep and bear arms to militia purposes, but rather limits the type of weapon to which the right applies to those used by the militia, i.e., those in common use for lawful purposes. Pp. 47–54.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZS.html


Supreme court opinion > your opinion.

You lose.

BanGuns Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> itd be far worse Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to
> the
> > security of a free State, the right of the
> people
> > to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
> >
> > Notice the commas, what part of the right of
> the
> > people to bear arms is hard to understand.
>
> Typical stupid republican.
>
> The commas break up the sentence so those of us
> with working brains aren't subjected to a run-on
> sentence. Didn't they mention run-on sentences in
> the red-neck schools you southern hicks farted
> in?
>
> The right of the people to bear arms is referring
> to the necessity of a well regulated militia, not
> to the rights of an individual, you inbred slack
> jawed racist.


Truly someone with your intellect and well spoken nature surely comprehends how the law works and that commas arent used as page breaks but rather to give different meanings to whats written.

Oh wait thats right youve clearly demonstrated the intelligence of an 8 year old who can only repeat things that are told.

If they only wanted a militia they would have said so. By the way all a militia is is a group of people with guns, so if you have friends with guns you can be a militia, youre too ignorant to even understand your argument wouldnt change the final outcome of citizens having guns.

Hopefully youre trolling because if you arent you are a true scumbag whose okay with having 100s of thousands of people die in a civil war so you can have what you want

OutlawGuns Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The democrats are in charge.


Clearly, you speak for all Democrats everywhere....

http://democratsforgunownership.org/

I'm not giving up my A rating from the NRA. No way. In Nevada they take the 2nd Amendment seriously.

SoylentGreen Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> OutlawGuns Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The democrats are in charge.
>
>
> Clearly, you speak for all Democrats
> everywhere....
>
> http://democratsforgunownership.org/

Hilarious, and then the guy calls me a troll... those who know me know I typically stick to the issues at hand.

itd be far worse Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Truly someone with your intellect and well spoken
> nature

What is a well spoken nature?

> surely comprehends how the law works

Unfortunately, I do.

> and
> that commas arent used as page breaks but rather
> to give different meanings to whats written.

That's one interpretation.

> Oh wait thats right youve clearly demonstrated the
> intelligence of an 8 year old who can only repeat
> things that are told.

Are you calling me a parrot with the intelligence of an 8 yr.old?

> If they only wanted a militia they would have said
> so. By the way all a militia is is a group of
> people with guns, so if you have friends with guns
> you can be a militia, youre too ignorant to even
> understand your argument wouldnt change the final
> outcome of citizens having guns.

Now that was one crazy run-on sentence, the last part being unintelligible.

Surely, someone with your intelligence and well spoken nature can come up with something better than that.

> Hopefully youre trolling because if you arent you
> are a true scumbag whose okay with having 100s of
> thousands of people die in a civil war so you can
> have what you want

Which civil war are we talking about?

What I gained from youre response.

1. You actually are in middle school
2. you cant understand sentences
3. you cant understand the consequences of actions
4. youre a waste of breath trying to have a reasonable discussion with
5. youre weseal or radiophile

You bore me, youve yet to provide a single fact in response. Maybe ill check back in in a week when the talking points get updated and see if you have anything new.

itd be far worse Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 5. youre weseal or radiophile

Oh, so now you're pulling out the big guns.

Those are fighin' words.

Could you please remember that you are representing the party of peace, not of war?

You republicans are such war mongers.

GunsKill Wrote:
----------------------------------------------------
> You republicans are such war mongers.

World War I, Korea, World War II, the US intervention in Haiti, Vietnam, the Mexican War, the Indian Wars, The Bay of Pigs, the Banana Republic Wars, The Punitive expedition, our six or so interventions in Nationalist China.

All were under Democratic presidents.

Unfortunately, the US has taken a role of "global policeman" upon itself since the Woodrow Wilson adminstration (and even earlier). This has led to both parties involving the country in far too many wars.

Heller Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> GunsKill Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > That's one interpretation.... the republican
> one.
> >
> > Go away, you're an antique.
>
>
> Well, here's the Supreme Court's interpretation:
>
> Held:
>
> 1. The Second Amendment protects an individual
> right to possess a firearm unconnected with
> service in a militia, and to use that arm for
> traditionally lawful purposes, such as
> self-defense within the home. Pp. 2–53.
>
> (a) The Amendment’s prefatory clause
> announces a purpose, but does not limit or expand
> the scope of the second part, the operative
> clause. The operative clause’s text and history
> demonstrate that it connotes an individual right
> to keep and bear arms. Pp. 2–22.
>
> (b) The prefatory clause comports with the
> Court’s interpretation of the operative clause.
> The “militia” comprised all males physically
> capable of acting in concert for the common
> defense. The Antifederalists feared that the
> Federal Government would disarm the people in
> order to disable this citizens’ militia,
> enabling a politicized standing army or a select
> militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress
> power to abridge the ancient right of individuals
> to keep and bear arms, so that the ideal of a
> citizens’ militia would be preserved. Pp.
> 22–28.
>
> (c) The Court’s interpretation is
> confirmed by analogous arms-bearing rights in
> state constitutions that preceded and immediately
> followed the Second Amendment . Pp. 28–30.
>
> (d) The Second Amendment ’s drafting
> history, while of dubious interpretive worth,
> reveals three state Second Amendment proposals
> that unequivocally referred to an individual right
> to bear arms. Pp. 30–32.
>
> (e) Interpretation of the Second Amendment
> by scholars, courts and legislators, from
> immediately after its ratification through the
> late 19th century also supports the Court’s
> conclusion. Pp. 32–47.
>
> (f) None of the Court’s precedents
> forecloses the Court’s interpretation. Neither
> United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542 , nor
> Presser v. Illinois, 116 U. S. 252 , refutes the
> individual-rights interpretation. United States v.
> Miller, 307 U. S. 174 , does not limit the right
> to keep and bear arms to militia purposes, but
> rather limits the type of weapon to which the
> right applies to those used by the militia, i.e.,
> those in common use for lawful purposes. Pp.
> 47–54.
>
> http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZS.ht
> ml
>
>
> Supreme court opinion > your opinion.
>
> You lose.


Do I?

You do realize that in the Heller case, the Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm for lawful purposes within the home, in federal enclaves only, don't you?

And you do realize that only the republican justices on the bench ruled this way, don't you?

Democrats will not rest until gun control in under control.

Only a scared little doomsday-is-coming nut job or a racist republican, afraid of african americans, would own a gun.

republicansRKillers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> Do I?
>
> You do realize that in the Heller case, the
> Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment
> protects an individual's right to possess a
> firearm for lawful purposes within the home, in
> federal enclaves only, don't you?
>
> And you do realize that only the republican
> justices on the bench ruled this way, don't you?
>
> Democrats will not rest until gun control in under
> control.
>
> Only a scared little doomsday-is-coming nut job or
> a racist republican, afraid of african americans,
> would own a gun.


It's done dude. Settled law.

You lose. So sorry.

GunsKill Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> itd be far worse Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 5. youre weseal or radiophile
>
> Oh, so now you're pulling out the big guns.
>
> Those are fighin' words.
>
> Could you please remember that you are
> representing the party of peace, not of war?
>
> You republicans are such war mongers.


Theyre the only two losers with no life that are this indoctrinated I can think of. Congrats if your not them you may be well on your way to passing them. Get a hobby or do something productive

Young Curmudgeon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> You're fucking illiterate. I've just said "I AM A
> DEMOCRAT, IDIOT!"


Then this:

November 21, 2012 08:11PM

Re: People demanding idiot woman who disrespected Tomb of the Unknown Soldier be fired

Young Curmudgeon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No, I'm a Republican .....


I knew it.

Guns Kill Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Young Curmudgeon Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > You're fucking illiterate. I've just said "I AM
> A
> > DEMOCRAT, IDIOT!"
>
>
> Then this:
>
> November 21, 2012 08:11PM
>
> Re: People demanding idiot woman who disrespected
> Tomb of the Unknown Soldier be fired
>
> Young Curmudgeon Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > No, I'm a Republican .....
>
>
> I knew it.

I changed my allegiance to force people like you to move towards the center.

Young Curmudgeon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Guns Kill Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Young Curmudgeon Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > > You're fucking illiterate. I've just said "I
> AM
> > A
> > > DEMOCRAT, IDIOT!"
> >
> >
> > Then this:
> >
> > November 21, 2012 08:11PM
> >
> > Re: People demanding idiot woman who
> disrespected
> > Tomb of the Unknown Soldier be fired
> >
> > Young Curmudgeon Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > No, I'm a Republican .....
> >
> >
> > I knew it.
>
> I changed my allegiance to force people like you
> to move towards the center.


uh huh

sounds more like you're trying to sell used cars.

the U.N. General Assembly's resolution on the treaty makes clear that countries will "exclusively" maintain the right within their borders to "regulate internal transfers of arms and national ownership, including through national constitutional protections on private ownerships."

The original poster is a dumbshit and his hysteria is without merit.

Meade's Hillbilly Cousin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> the U.N. General Assembly's resolution on the
> treaty makes clear that countries will
> "exclusively" maintain the right within their
> borders to "regulate internal transfers of arms
> and national ownership, including through national
> constitutional protections on private
> ownerships."
>
> The original poster is a dumbshit and his hysteria
> is without merit.

You obviously didn't click the link and read the letter.
The Secretary of State would have the authority to refuse
to sign import/export licensing agreements for sporting/
home defense firearms. Do you have any idea how many imported
firearms are sold in this country every year? Do some homework.

idea!
Attachments: