JBass Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> bully bites Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > JBass Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > bully bites Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > JBass Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > I see a lot of fluff and conjecture here
> > but
> > > no
> > > > > one is citing any actual statistics. How
> > > about
> > > > > you lazy judgmental haters show some hard
> > > proof.
> > > >
> > > > > Pitbulls kill their owners more than any
> > > other
> > > > > breed? Prove it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Without any solid facts you are just
> > > spreading
> > > > > misinformation and misguided hate.
> > > > >
> > > > > And to 6X, please do not change the
> subject.
> >
> > > I
> > > > > was not comparing animals to humans. I
> was
> > > > making
> > > > > a very simple point that no matter what
> the
> > > > > criterion, you can not use a single
> > incident
> > > to
> > > > > prove a pattern.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://dogbitelaw.com/images/pdf/breeds-causing-DB
>
> >
> > >
> > > > RFs.pdf
> > > >
> > > > there ya go in black and white.
> > >
> > > Okay now please provide statistics that
> > actually
> > > mean anything. In other words, without
> knowing
> > > the percentage of the total K9 population
> each
> > > breed represents, this does nothing to show
> > that
> > > bullies are more dangerous than other breeds.
>
> > >
> > > What Im saying is that there are
> exponentially
> > > more bullies than there are mastiffs or many
> of
> > > the other breeds listed.
> > >
> > > You cant take a statistic from SE DC that
> shows
> > > 90% of crimes are committed by blacks and
> have
> > it
> > > show that blacks are more likely to commit a
> > crime
> > > unless you can show that blacks compose less
> > than
> > > 90% of the population in SE DC.
> > >
> > > While this study does seem to be well put
> > > together, it lacks any substantive ability to
> > show
> > > that one breed is more dangerous than
> another.
> >
> > Here:
> >
> > Pit bulls cause one-third of dog-bite related
> > fatalities while only make up less than 2% of
> the
> > dog population.
> >
> >
>
http://www.dog-bite-law-center.com/pgs/stats.html
> >
> > What new criteria do you want to add to further
> > look ignorant?
>
> According to YOUR site, which has a clear bias
> against the breed, 66 out of 238 were bullie
> fatalities. In what math world do you live in
> where 66 is 1/3 of 238. The same site, second
> link you provided, blatantly contradicts the first
> link. Do you honestly think bullies account for
> 2% of the dog population? C'mon. Get a clue.
> Your reference site has proven itself to have an
> agenda and will no longer be considered a valid
> resource.
Two different studies taken in different years. Also, go with the low nunbers. What percentage do you think pit bulls are of the total dog population? 20%? 30%? You haven't put up any numbers that portray this hideous breed as docile.